Caribbean Response to the Withdrawal of Correspondent Banking

Tao Zhang

Tao Zhang

Alicia Nicholls IMF Deputy Managing Director, Mr. Tao Zhang, gave an interesting and comprehensive speech summarising the “Caribbean response to the Withdrawal of Correspondent Banking” at the Conference on the Withdrawal of Correspondent Banking in Antigua & Barbuda on October 28, 2016. The following realities stood out to me from Mr. Zhang’s speech: Almost 60% […]

Read more of this post

Tags: , ,

69 Comments on “Caribbean Response to the Withdrawal of Correspondent Banking”

  1. Vincent Haynes October 29, 2016 at 9:05 AM #


    Can you do a precis as to why we need correspondent banking?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Violet C Beckles October 29, 2016 at 9:15 AM #

    Well you have to know that land , money and fraud goes hand and hand, You all dont listen nor learn that Barbados is full of fraud and not grow with out , out side investors, internal investing in COW and the crooks lawyers is stuck on stupid,
    The rest of the World is learning as you can see China is now heading Banking by the IMF and not American , Who controls the money now want things done right with Honor,

    Barbados have a lot to clean up with , Here Comes BRICS, like it or not USA is no longer the head of Banking and Loans, All funds now must be back by Gold and not good faith and credit,

    The is a better New World Order, The “White Dragon Society” is now leading the way with Russia, Barbados PM and crooks Ministers time is short as WARRANTS WORLD WIDE IS GOING AFTER BANKERS AND LAWYERS,Ministers WHO MAKE THIS WORLD ON EARTH HELL.


  3. caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 9:41 AM #

    @Vincent Haynes, you have asked a sensible question and I am happy to respond. In a nut shell, correspondent banking relationships are what make everyday activities like sending and receiving remittances, cashing foreign cheques, sending wire transfers and other forms of payment for international goods and services possible. All of these are things which we all depend on at some point in time, some of us on a daily basis. Therefore, the loss or restriction of these relationships would make it difficult of us to receive remittances or send wire transfer. On a micro level it is an inconvenience. On a macro level, potentially disastrous for our economies.


  4. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 9:58 AM #

    @ CTL at 9 :41 A:M

    How much of the Banking system in the Caribbean is made up of international commercial banks? We need to have this in value and by number of customers. Would you please elaborate what you mean by disastrous at the macro-economy level?


  5. David October 29, 2016 at 9:58 AM #

    The following is extracted from the Deputy IMF Director’s speech in Antigua from the link provided. It probably explains what informed Dr. Justin Robinson’s comment in the local media yesterday that international bank might look to exit the region. This is where the CBR issue will bite if indigenous FIs are expected to stepup.


    In short, the withdrawal of CBRs is partly a reflection of cost-benefit tradeoffs growing out of increased regulation and enforcement affecting international banks, global banks.

    Regulatory reforms have produced increased bank capital and liquidity requirements. This has contributed to reduced profitability of correspondent banking.

    In addition, compliance costs have increased because of the intensified efforts to combat money laundering and terrorism financing.

    Banks also have to respond to efforts to promote international tax transparency.


  6. David October 29, 2016 at 10:03 AM #

    For those of you who do NOT follow the links here is another snippet from Zhang:

    The Caribbean Association of Banks says that almost 60 percent of member institutions that it has interviewed report a loss of such relationships.

    A significant % of financial transactions is done by the indigenous FIs. However you spin the issue it is a problem and it is why the Caricom heads have created a taskforce led by Antigua to champion the issue with the international players.


  7. caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 10:06 AM #

    @Bernard Codrington, the research is online for you to consult. The IMF, CPMI, CDB etc have all written informative reports on this. Do have a read of them if you care for more information on the topic.


  8. Vincent Haynes October 29, 2016 at 10:06 AM #

    caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 9:41 AM #

    How feasible would it be for the Caribbean as a whole to establish its own banking facilities around the world like the Rothschilds did 400 odd years ago?


  9. caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 10:08 AM #

    @David, you are right on point.


  10. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 10:09 AM #

    As i stated when BU introduced this issue in a previous Blog,the problem surfaced because the Developing countries want to pass the costs of tracking their criminals to emerging economies. The drug trade has meant for us increased Security, policing and Judicial system costs. Tax avoidance and tax evasion ,elaborate tracking systems and institutions. All these require resources which could be better allocated to our social and economic development. We hardly have any choices because they form the markets for our goods and services.


  11. caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 10:14 AM #

    @Vincent Haynes, it is an issue which has been mooted. For starters, it will be an expensive undertaking and will require regional cooperation and financial commitment at a time when many of our governments remain highly indebted. Secondly, any such bank will be subject to the regulations of the jurisdiction in which it is domiciled. However, it is something of which Caribbean countries may have to seriously weigh the costs and benefits if this situation continues.


  12. Vincent Haynes October 29, 2016 at 10:19 AM #

    caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 10:14 AM #

    It may very well be the reason needed to weld these territories together.

    The time is long overdue that we stop being reactive and start being pro-active and firmly re-establish our place in the world order.


  13. caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 10:23 AM #

    @Bernard Codrington, the issue stems from the lack of profitability of maintaining CBRs with our jurisdictions versus the compliance costs plus the potential fines those correspondent banks face if a lapse occurs. In Barbados we are fortunate only to the extent that all of our commercial banks are foreign owned and have still retained their CBRs. However, the offshore banks do not have that luxury. Moreover, as David noted, those banks could pull out of the island. Moreover, in countries where indigenous banks have a greater market presence, the loss of CBRs has brought hardship. Belize is a noteworthy example which I saw firsthand earlier this year when I was there presenting on this issue at a conference. It is a serious issue which is why FATF, as well as other agencies are monitoring it.


  14. caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 10:24 AM #

    @Vincent Haynes, I couldn’t agree with you more!


  15. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 10:25 AM #

    @ Vincent Haynes at10:06 AM,

    Very difficult and too costly. You may or may not recall BNB’s attempt to establish a presence in London to accommodate the Bajan Diaspora. The BOE persuaded the CBB to put moral suasion on BNB to close it; and so it was. You may recall that Sagicor was listed for a very short time on the London Stock exchange. Do you recall what happened there?
    But perhaps you may want to try again. I am one of those economists who like to subject every policy and every economic decision to a cost benefit analysis.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Vincent Haynes October 29, 2016 at 10:33 AM #

    Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 10:25 AM #

    Take a lesson from Brexit…..lets decide as a Caribbean whole to do it come what may…….we have for too long hung on the coat tails of others,we simply must find a way to establish our own international banking structure,even in partnership with other LDCs in the same boat.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 10:33 AM #

    @Bernard Codrington, agreed re the costliness of such a venture.


  18. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 10:33 AM #


    Thanks for keeping BU aware and informed. You and your organization are pro active Continue smartly.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM #

    @Bernard Codrington, many thanks. I respect your expertise and enjoy reading your comments even where we disagree. I would love to chat with you some time.


  20. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 10:58 AM #

    @ Vincent Haynes at 10:33 AM

    I am of the view that Brexit took a lesson from Jamaica Exit and T & T Exit of 1962. 52 % of the British electorate did a cost benefit analysis and determined that in the long run the benefits to Britain far exceeded the costs of surrendering its sovereignty.

    There are alternatives to an antiquated CBRS System. The financial instruments which it was designed to facilitate are being replaced.


  21. Vincent Haynes October 29, 2016 at 11:09 AM #

    Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 10:58 AM #

    I was there during Brexit and would say that the 52% were fed up with the system and wanted change,so when Gove,Johnson&Farage promissed them what they wanted to hear they voted for it not realising the hard road ahead,the same is likely to happen in the USA.The masses of the western world are fed up.

    The question is…..what will motivate us Caribbean people to work together for the greater good?


  22. Hal Austin October 29, 2016 at 11:10 AM #

    I am disappointed when lawyers pose as know-alls and get it embarrassingly wrong. Citizenship by investment receipt i an invitation to the Russians and Mafia. Do we in the Caribbean have any national pride?
    As to so-called correspondent banking, this is he US trying to bully the rest of the world. All small banks need is a relationship with global payments system so that cheque can be cleared across borders.
    In any case, the newly formed Barbados Revenue Authority now declines to accept foreign cheques from people paying their land tax.
    The problem is young lawyers who want to make a name for themselves move away from criminal litigation in to areas they do not know very much about.
    There is minimal financial content on the curriculum of the Wooding School. I know that because a friend of mine who studied there asked for some assistance while there.
    As to Brexit, not even the British know what is going on. Stop talking about things you know nothing about.
    Parliament is still waiting to see what role it has to play.


  23. David October 29, 2016 at 11:16 AM #


    What is your point? Your quote highlights the problem indigenous bank have in the prevailing climate. Caricom has sized the problem and has set up a high powered lobby sub Caricom group. Have you visited Belize and to a lesser extent Antigua to sniff the problem? First you need to appreciate that there is a problem.

    As to so-called correspondent banking, this is he US trying to bully the rest of the world. All small banks need is a relationship with global payments system so that cheque can be cleared across borders.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 11:22 AM #

    I wish to remind BU Bloggers that the World behaves like an organism. It is constantly evolving. Each change we make results in a consequential change almost instantly. The capitalism of the first Industrial Revolution in the 19th century is not identical to the Capitalist system which has developed over the last three decades.
    The financial system has taken precedence and is disrupting the Real Economy. It is profit driven. Money seems to matter more than welfare. By Real Economy I mean the production and distribution of goods and services. The concern is not the consumer but financial benefits to shareholders, and senior management.


  25. David October 29, 2016 at 11:26 AM #

    Bernard you could easily have added that Barbados and the other Caribbean islands are signatories to many international arrangements that ensure we march to the beat of the global drum. What is globalization?


  26. Vincent Haynes October 29, 2016 at 11:29 AM #

    Time for us to unite and re-think this globalisation thing.


  27. Hal Austin October 29, 2016 at 11:29 AM #

    That our banks are foreign-owned is not good fortune, it poses a systemic risk to our regulation. Whether our banks are branches, or wholly-owned subsidiaries, it means that key decisions are being made in Trinidad, the US and Canada. This is a regulatory risk to our financial system.
    That is why we urgently need a Barbados domiciled bank. Commenters seem to be making a mistake between retail and investment banks. Government underwrite retail banks, which means that if there is a run on one of these foreign-owned banks and Barbadian savers stand to lose their life savings, the government must step in.
    If the problem is with the investment arm, as things stand, that will contaminate the retail arm when rightly the burden should be that of the investors.
    Barbados must not try to punch above its weight: we need a small bank that accepts salary cheques, offer credit cards, pay standing orders, offer an ATM service, offer a service to small businesses, protection insurance to households and SMEs.
    The story about the BNB and Sagicor operating in London is something else. I will tell that story at some point. Read the Bank of England’s report on the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Barrow saved the local branch).
    The Americans – SEC, state attorneys general, Dept of Justice, Uncle Tom Cobbley and all – etc are punishing the British and European banks for the 2007/8 financial crisis. We do not want to fall in to that trap. It is American protectionism at it worst.


  28. David October 29, 2016 at 11:34 AM #


  29. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 11:36 AM #

    @ Vincent Haynes

    Too many commentators and politicians assume that they are the only persons that are thinking and wise . Never underestimate the electorate, especially an educated one. I think you need to visit the blocks and the village Sport Bars. Not to pontificate but to listen.


  30. Hal Austin October 29, 2016 at 11:36 AM #

    As to the June 23 Referendum, the British voted along race lines, immigration, not on the power of Brussels. That was the over-arching narrative, but the reality was the hordes of people coming across the Mediterranean.
    Look at the developments in Germany, France, Belgium – and the fascists coming out of the woodwork in Hungary and Poland.
    Remember, Brits speak with fork tongue – what they say is not always what they mean.


  31. David October 29, 2016 at 11:39 AM #


    Let us accept all you posited in your last comment, the CBR issue is still in play. In other words how will said indigenous bank establish a relationship with the international clearing network to settle external transactions.


  32. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 11:49 AM #

    @ David @11:26 AM

    The signators acted with our consent. They were our agents. If one wants to reverse the signators , change the agents.
    Barbados was always part of a Global Economy. The “Globe” just got larger. Small Countries with Big Countries’ aspirations cannot opt out of the Global Economy.


  33. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 11:59 AM #

    @ David at 11:39

    The indigenous bank can open a Foreign Currency account with the local subsidiary of the International Bank and have all his international financial relationships satisfied. I can think of at least 5 other methods but this exercise is purely academic.


  34. David October 29, 2016 at 12:04 PM #


    Why do you say it would be academic? Wouldn’t the transaction of opening a foreign account at a local foreign subsidiary not have to undergo the very due diligence being critiqued by Alicia’s piece?


  35. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 12:15 PM #


    Why do you want to remove due diligence from financial transactions ? Do you not do it when you lend money , your car , your garden fork? If you know there are thieves scoping the area, do you still leave your house key in the plant pot?
    The same relates to local financial institutions.


  36. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 12:19 PM #

    Have you examined the recent financial history of Antigua and Belize ?


  37. David October 29, 2016 at 12:43 PM #


    The point about due diligence is that the local subsidiary will not escape the risk policy of the head office.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. caribbeantradelaw October 29, 2016 at 12:56 PM #

    @David, you are correct.


  39. Vincent Haynes October 29, 2016 at 12:57 PM #

    Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 11:36 AM #

    Pubs,Blocks&Rumshops have been always my haunts,it is the only way to discover the pulse of wherever you are in the world………which is why I say that the 52% did no such analysis as you stated…….they like many others in the western world are fed up with the broken promisses of the the politicians…..yet they bought into Johnso&Co. and the USA may do likewise with Trump.


  40. David October 29, 2016 at 1:01 PM #


    Agree with you and it explains Trump’s popularity, a non politician.


  41. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 1:07 PM #

    @ David

    Why should it? Do you think shareholders invest in a bank to lose its investments or to have their dividends reduced because some banker did not do due diligence?

    Do you think that the Central Bank of Canada wants the Financial system of Canada compromised because of the negligence of some bank clerk in Barbados?

    You admitted that we live in a global Economy. You saw the world wide effect of giving home mortgages to mortgagors who had low incomes or no incomes but still obtained mortgages. That event costs the American tax payers Trillions of USD. So whatever system you come up with local ,regional,or world wide , there will be a need for due diligence.


  42. Well Well & Consequences October 29, 2016 at 1:19 PM #

    Let them keep believing everything the british says and see if they do not end up in shackles and chains again, in their lifetime.


  43. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 1:20 PM #

    Vincent Haynes,
    52 % of the people voted for Brexit. People who had skin in the game. With all the information provided to them , made a decision. Your view that it was a bad decision does not matter. Your opinion is not fact.

    Similarly if the USA electorate votes for Trump in the next few days ,that will be their decision. It may or may not have disastrous consequences for the rest of the world . But they call the shots. My opinion and your opinion about Trump is academic.


  44. David October 29, 2016 at 1:23 PM #


    We are obviously not communicating on the same wave length. Watch the YouTube posted earlier. The presenter scopes the issues from a regulator’s perspective.


  45. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 1:42 PM #

    What wave length is BU on? Tell me so I can zero in on the same frequency?

    Liked by 1 person

  46. millertheanunnaki October 29, 2016 at 1:45 PM #

    @ Vincent Haynes October 29, 2016 at 10:33 AM #
    “Take a lesson from Brexit…..lets decide as a Caribbean whole to do it come what may…….we have for too long hung on the coat tails of others,we simply must find a way to establish our own international banking structure,even in partnership with other LDCs in the same boat.”

    Dream on, my friend!

    If these people can’t even get a two-bit airline called LIAT to operate effectively enough to promote greater regional integration and facilitate greater economic activity do you really feel they are capable of establishing their “own international banking structure”?

    Barbados cannot be part of any “international banking structure, even in partnership with other LDCs in the same boat” unless it is prepared to jettison its own fast debasing currency and close down its money printing press call its Central Bank.

    When the Caricom states are able to accept the CCJ and its ambit of jurisprudence as the legal currency of the socio-economic realm them you can exit the big brother house of dreams and talk about day-to-day survival in the big bad world of Finance.

    East Caribbean governments and their political class including Barbados have allowed themselves to be tainted and sullied with the dirt of corruption, money-laundering and the selling of succor and blatant protection from the law to both local and international criminals in the underworld of finance.

    The cases of Allen Stanford and your own homegrown CLICO Ponzi boys spring readily to mind.
    Are you forgetting how a local politician was able to launder his ill-gotten gains by having them deposited in his ‘poor’ mother’s bank account?

    What about the speaker of a most august chamber of law-making, having deprived a disabled geriatric of thousands of his family’s inheritance, is publicly supported by a h.o.g and is openly offered protection from moral censure and allowed to disgrace that former hallowed court of justice and fair-play by his continuing presence.

    Maybe the OECD is seized with more information about these regional shenanigans that you might wish to believe.


  47. David October 29, 2016 at 1:49 PM #


    To open a foreign account with the subsidiary of a foreign bank it stands to reason the that the risk policy of the Bank i.e. head office will be applied by the local subsidiary. Others more learned can clarify.


  48. Vincent Haynes October 29, 2016 at 1:52 PM #

    Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 1:20 PM #

    I have not opined on Brexit…….I am a firm believer that the will of the masses must be respected and I agree with May that Brexit means Brexit(whenever she defines it)……we will agree to disagree on the analysis done by the 52%.


  49. Vincent Haynes October 29, 2016 at 1:54 PM #

    millertheanunnaki October 29, 2016 at 1:45 PM #

    Sadly you are correct……but we must have a vision and attempt to obtain it.

    The OECD central bank is the strongest in the Caribbean……possibly not saying much but still a glimmer of hope.


  50. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 1:58 PM #

    David at 2:49 PM

    And I agree. There is nothing wrong about that.


  51. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 2:13 PM #

    That should have been 1 :49 Pm.


  52. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 2:17 PM #

    Miller at 1:45pm

    You have made it pellucidly clear. I hope you are on the right wave length.


  53. chad99999 October 29, 2016 at 2:23 PM #

    This subject is apparently intended for a few insiders: David, Alicia, Vincent, Bernard and Hal.

    It is brought up over and over again, but only as a form of “arm waving”. The scope of the so-called “problem” is not defined, the banks losing their correspondent relationships are not named. There is something ridiculous about claiming our remittances could be threatened by a few regulators, when the Internet is creating many new, cheaper non-traditional ways to send money across international borders.

    Alicia is flying all over the hemisphere using up hundred of thousands of dollars of scarce resources “presenting” on the subject ( what a gravy train), but she only offers a few scraps of information to the public. The World Bank is threatening countries across the globe with sanctions, including disconnection from the “global financial system”. How can the global system be a global system if it excludes many Third World countries?


  54. David October 29, 2016 at 2:36 PM #


    You have posted nonsense and you know it. Have you viewed the video above where a presenter (Allan Wright) from the Central Bank sized the problem?

    Did you read the address delivered by deputy IMF Secretary General Zhang?

    Are you aware Prime Minister of Antigua Brown heads a Caricom group charged with championing this matter in the international arena?

    Step up chad99999!


  55. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 2:50 PM #

    @ David

    Chads view is that it is a surmountable problem. Even a non problem.


  56. millertheanunnaki October 29, 2016 at 3:16 PM #

    @ David October 29, 2016 at 2:36 PM

    Poor Chaddie might appear as saddled, albeit it innocently, with a bout of dogged tunnel vision.

    But he must be on to something more surreptitiously undermining in the grand scheme of things than superficially meets the eye.

    I am sure you have heard about the saying “there is more than one way to skin a cat”.
    If we can’t close down their ‘suspect’ offshore tax havens and shelters by politically insensitive means why not undermine their economies by blockading their access to international finance under the guise of fighting money laundering and terrorism?

    The Caribbean has always been an arena of ‘underhand’ business dealings. From trading in slaves, contraband, privateering and piracy to modern-day drug trafficking, money laundering and tax evasion.

    Why not invite China to set up a banking structure in the English-speaking East Caribbean as they have done with other facets of the economies and societies?

    That should attract some geo-political clout to these more and more insignificantly becoming small-island states


  57. David October 29, 2016 at 3:21 PM #


    What a wonderful suggestion, in theory.

    Is the One China policy setup? We have several EC countries who have traveled the diplomatic path to Taiwan.

    What now!


  58. Hal Austin October 29, 2016 at 3:25 PM #

    Only a week ago today at a dinner party I was talking to a Jamaican wealth manager about a related issue. The problem is caused by the long-arm of American regulation. Any financial adviser, bank, insurance company or wealth manager with US clients now face US regulation, even if the clients live outside the US.
    Many advisers are now turning down business from US citizens based in the UK since they do not want to deal with the IRS.
    About Caricom – and I am a Caricom fan – if they could not deal adequately with Clico (St Lucia had its own settlement, so did the Bahamas, Guyana, Trinidad and Barbados)
    Caricom proved its weakness when the chips were down. But it is all we have.
    Th problem is that prime ministers of little islands with populations of a relatively few people do not want to lose power and influence by passing that power on to a regional union. The power to hire and fire is too addictive.
    What is really backward looking is the BRA not allowing overseas cheques to be paid in. BRA, as a modern body, should allow electronic payment and international cheque payments.
    Again, we need a Barbados-domiciled bank. Arthur committed the ultimate betrayal when he sold BNB. Our systemically important financial institutions cannot – should not – be regulated by the Canadians, Americans or Trinidadians. That is the situation at present.


  59. David October 29, 2016 at 3:30 PM #

    @Hal Austin

    You continue to conflate several issue. What is on the table is how does the region respond to the CBR issue and the attendant de-risking. Establishing a local bank maybe a good thing but it will not solve the problem at hand. Bear in mind who makes the rules also.


  60. chad99999 October 29, 2016 at 3:36 PM #


    You are the one posting nonsense. I have read the IMF official’s speech and it is nothing but vague generalities.

    There is nothing substantial about the other information you have provided on this subject. For example, the black doctor on the video clip leads us into a black hole: This is what he said:
    (1) Caribbean banks are not on the FATFs sanctions list. (2) The fines paid by ING, HSBC, Barclays, etc. are for transactions with Africa, the Middle East and Asia. (He calls these big fines — they are not).
    (3) International banks may cut off Caribbean banks, not because they are contravening FATF and US banking regulations, but because they do not generate sufficient profits for the international banks.
    Therefore, (4) we in the Caribbean must do something. –The good doctor declines to tell us what that something is, so his entire presentation leads nowhere.

    This is clearly an exercise in what politicians call “preparing public opinion” to get a rubber stamp for whatever the elites have already decided, and Alicia and the two doctors all talk about the need to “bundle” international financial transactions, under the regulatory guidance of the ECCB of course, so we realize that the elites are using this issue to again promote the bad idea of regional integration. But apart from pushing the drug of integration (which only leads to eventual rule by East Indians), what have we learned here? We are still a group of tiny islands, and even with “bundling”, we may still be deemed unworthy (I.e., insufficiently profitable) clients.


  61. Bush Tea October 29, 2016 at 3:53 PM #

    If we have built our societies …and our very lives, around the albino-centric world of these people, what is this great hue and cry about bowing down to their great image?
    We went out and committed everything to becoming ‘first world’ … or fully on board with the albino shiite. …from whence now is this concern about abiding with their controls?

    It is only obvious that we must bow down and conform to their wishes – or as Nebuchadnezzar required of HIS lackies – across the then world, “…at what time ye hear the sound of the cornet, flute, harp, sackbut, psaltery, dulcimer, and all kinds of musick, ye fall down and worship the golden image that Nebuchadnezzar the king hath set up: And whoso falleth not down and worshippeth shall the same hour be cast into the midst of a burning fiery furnace.”

    Same shiite.
    If we do not conform, they will take away our bank account and cast THAT into the fiery furnace – and leave our asses to play with our mock money…

    Wuh sweeten goat mout does burn he tail.

    The big joke is Vincent’s ‘solution’ – of using CARICOM to address the problem.
    Boss, the problem was CREATED by the globalisation drive that based its logic on a one-world economy….. How does a mini Caribbean approach solve anything?

    Man …tell the Babylonians to haul…. and let them cast wunna asses in the furnace …and let we see if anyone will come to our aid …like with Shaddy, Meshakkie, and Abed…..
    Ha ha ha


  62. exclaimer October 29, 2016 at 4:52 PM #

    Let us celebrate our fifty years of ” independence ” with gay abandon by popping the champagne corks and applauding our limited achievements. Once we have sobered up let’s admit that this independence experiment has ultimately ended in failure.

    Perhaps we may be better of living under the union jack.


  63. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 4:57 PM #

    Bush Tea @ 3:53 PM

    Another wise man did say all is vapour. There is nothing new under the sun.
    We economist always said money was a token. The Good Book said the love of money is the root of evil.
    So shall we get back to the real economy? The one that deals with employment and a fair distribution of the fruits of the economic system?

    Alicia, like all of us in this society you have to eat bread too. So do what and where your passion leads you.


  64. Bernard Codrington. October 29, 2016 at 5:13 PM #

    @ Exclaimer 4:52 PM,

    Who told you the Union Jack want us to live under it.? Last time I read the news the waver of the flag asked us to set up our own Court of Appeal. Some of us still squatting in the corridors.

    Your failure mark for Barbados Independence Experiment is too high and unfair. Would you consider a system of Continuous Assessment? There is no way Barbados can fail that test.


  65. Violet C Beckles October 30, 2016 at 1:25 AM #

    China China the new IMF leaders will get these 2 bit crooks in Bim, I hope they dont fall for the DBLP tricks,They will now have to deal with COW and BIZZY before the new Banking get them all in the PANAMA PAPERS, Fraud and Ponzi is now under attack ,


  66. Vincent Haynes October 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM #

    Bush Tea October 29, 2016 at 3:53 PM #

    You of all people should know……in unity lies strength……


  67. Hal Austin October 30, 2016 at 12:58 PM #

    There is no conflating. There is the theory and there is the working at the coal face. The one thing about the City of London is that people are generous with their knowledge. Caricom has failed and our lawyer/politicians and the media do not fully understand financial services.
    To be honest, I am now retired and do not want to relive the arguments and discussions of 2007/8. The world has moved on, even if Caricom is now dealing with those issues.


  68. David October 31, 2016 at 10:20 AM #


    The other point we didn’t fully ventilate is the recommendation that the small indigenous banks must consolidate to create scale to make the transaction more attracted for the big banks.


  69. Vincent Haynes October 31, 2016 at 4:54 PM #

    David October 31, 2016 at 10:20 AM #

    We have to forget about big banks,I agree with the consolidation of the indigineous banks and a single currency at the ECD peg…..we then need to find a way to padlle our own canoe through the shark infested waters of the international banking world.


Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: