Submitted by Pachamama
Recently we had occasion to review the series “House of Cards” and with the much heralded first Q&A sessions between Clinton and Trump being primed for profit, we now consider how art mimics reality, or is more realistic than reality. The differences, if any, between fiction and fact in politics. The centrality of war and peace in this election, if any of this could be serious, for a minute.
As we write both Clinton and Trump are going through their rehearsals in order to present what has been determined should be their best image/s. It’s all about perception management, not fact necessarily. Not truth either, if lies have more purchase. They are politicians playing ‘actors’ attempting to win an Oscar or two.
In the ‘House of Cards’ the president of the USA was portrayed in a more realistic manner than the current one or the wannabes are on the networks. President Underwood was seen as a serial murderer; a manipulator; the son of a man with ties to the KKK; a man surrounded by henchmen, bag men, wet workers, dry workers, willing to break any law in the protection of Underwood and in the finale – willing to go to war to avoid negative news reports about his own sins.
The activities this weekend at the UN suggest that an imminent Clinton presidency would mean a declaration of war on Russia. Clinton is obviously head of the war party in wait. Russia has had to asked ‘who was in charge in the USA’. Obama is clearly not, as the Pentagon has openly disobeyed his orders and bombed Syrian soldiers to show defiance to him. He is now the little boy sitting at the kiddie’s table.
And the CIA continues to arm terrorist groups in Syria in contravention of direct orders from Obama. It is clear Clinton, Samantha Powers and ilk are intent on a humanitarian nuclear war to further the interests of the one-percenters. Russia phobia has gone mad in the USA. And Trump may be our worst best hope, imagine that. For Hilary Clinton is a very, very, wicked bitch.
These are not the images we will see in the reality show which will dominate network coverage over the coming weeks. Any realities would require more than a soundbite, be too complicated for a dumb-down public, be absent of the zingers which Ronald Reagan made popular, fail to deliver the killer blow which both candidates will strive for but a draw could be satisfactory for both candidates and is the most likely outcome.
What we will certainly not see are the political infrastructures before, during and after these Q&A sessions to influence perceived outcomes. It is imminently possible to, by objectives measures, win the debates but loose the perception game. And this has happened before. So the showmanship around these sessions are more important than what actually happens during the Q&As themselves. Is this not then mere political theater?
The same will be true for the actual presidential elections. It is very possible to win the elections and loose the presidency. These days, the best way of achieve the ‘dark arts’ of the political game is to make the false claim of voter fraud by non-White population segmentations unlikely to support you while plotting with the internet experts to rob the electronic vote train as it conveys tallies to the central counting center.
This was the type of voter robbery Romney and Carl Rove attempted in 2012 to deny Obama a second term. Had it not been for the hacker group ‘Anonymous’ we would have had a flipping of tallies as happened in Florida 2000. In the fictional account, President Underwood had developed a more profound method for the total influencing of public perceptions by manipulation the news voters read – from jump street, making sure that only information supportive of him occupied the first items on most search engines, influencing other mainstream media houses, like only a sitting president could.
We know that the Clintons have not been dissimilar to President Underwood. Indeed, all US presidents have employed violence to achieve stated aims, at home and abroad. Clinton is particularly troubling and represent an existential threat to all mankind with her intent to escalate aggression against Russia, her willingness to deploy nuclear weapons, her blind support for the Zionist regime in Palestine, as ultimate war hawk. Now that the Clintons family has married into Jewry we should expect Benjamin Netanyahu in the White House, on steroid, should she win.
As far as violence is concerned, Trump represents a somewhat unknown quantity. Clinton loyalists have been trying to influence perceptions by arguing that he is a friend of the Russians. A country Clinton sees as her primary enemy, a la Ukraine. In this their acolytes in the media have been helpful in painting Putin as a dictator. But Clinton herself, is not unknown for her love affairs with the worst of dictators. They say Trump cuddles Putin. We are unsure what his orientation is likely to be about war and peace but expect that Trump may very well end up in the children’s room, left out of the loop, when the adults, the war party, discuss these matters.
However, given his history, his mental disposition, a 14-year-old boy trapped in a man’s body, his innate dislike for people of colour. We would also contend that no remarkably dissimilar policy positions from those of Clinton or President Underwood should be expected. We will also argue that Trump’s inability to show empathy and his spoilt-child orientation makes him particular dangerous in possession of nuclear weapons should he get a look-in.
A president Clinton will provide more material for writers on the ‘’House of Cards’’. Her administration will be characterized by so many investigations that it will make the Bill Clinton presidency look like a cake walk. Those investigations will be centered on the Clinton Foundation et al which has devolved into a hundreds of billions of dollars in money laundering, a trans-national, criminal enterprise, operating under the cloak of a 5O1C3 and not properly registered in various jurisdictions nor properly reporting.
A Trump presidency is no less likely to be characterized by criminal investigations. He too has issues with the usage of Trump Foundation money, tax code violations etc. The viability of these proceeding may very well depend upon the relative numbers of Republicans and Democrats ‘selected’ in the Senate and the House of Representatives. But a Democratic presidency and a Republican congress will be more eager to go for the impeachment of Clinton, from day one.
It certainly is not helpful to the people of the world that Clinton has already suggested her husband to be the employment czar. In the ‘House of Cards’, President Underwood moved heaven and earth to have his wife, the first lady, in an open marriage, to be the vice-presidential candidate. How life mimics art!
This political theater is manufactured to be unfair. For Jill Stein and Rocky Anderson will not be there, neither would the other up to 100 candidates who are on some ballots. The corporation, run by Republicans and Democrats who own this project is less interested in fairness than the League of Women Voters who ran the debates up to the 1980s.
President Underwood would have been glad to locate this set of moderators willing to keep fictions alive. Moderators refusing to do any fact checking. Moderators who have said that even obvious misstatements made will not be highlighted. Moderators prepared to have candidates disobey rules of truth without sanction.
The elections in the USA should be about the survival of the planet, the avoidance of war, the extent to which the one-percenters are seeking to gain more control over us all. What is certain is that a Clinton victory will insure all the above. It is difficult for us to contemplate circumstances where a Trump presidency could avoid these sets of outcomes given the diffusion of the war party forces and the acceptance of the PNAC agenda by all mainstream political forces.
Maybe the election will be a watershed. A time when the ‘House of Cards’ collapses. But we seriously doubt. However, these dog and pony shows should not properly qualify as debates. They are more Q & A sessions, billed like fights between Ali & Fraser, with the winner known ahead of time, depending on who spends the most money in advertising on the networks sponsoring same.
597 responses to “Clinton Versus Trump – Fiction Versus Fact”
The Saudis screwed themselves…karma.
http://ow.ly/uySj304GhQ9
“Separately, a coalition of Caribbean nations is calling for reparations from their former European imperial powers for the impact of slavery, colonial genocide and the toxic racial laws that shaped life for the past two centuries in these countries. Their efforts are fitful, and so far not so fruitful.”
This information should have hit main stream media in Barbsdos and across the Caribbean like a hurricane.
The as*hole are more interested in Angelina Jolie divorcing Brad Pitt….no sense of what is important for Blacks in Barbados and across the Caribbean….always distracted by useless crap..
The override of the veto is one of the most irresponsible acts that this Congress did and that’s saying a lot in an era of irresponsible politicians. In future it will be called the law of unintended consequences., why Saudi Arabia? Why not Afghanistan which harboured Bin Laden? I hold no brief for the Saudis but how can you sue a country because of the acts of its citizens? Is the US at risk of being sued because of the acts of its Government in countries where citizens are killed by acts of their military personnel and the victims are termed “collateral damage”? How many people have been killed by drones in acts of “mistaken identity”? What is the final body count of civilians killed in Iraq by off target bombs? It was propitious that this Veto came to fruition on the eve of an election as the sniveling cowards don’t want to be characterized as politicians who voted against the wishes of9/11 families.
There is a quote attributed to Confucius which states “Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves” (one for your enemy and one for yourself). Obama as usual saw beyond the petty politics and the need for revenge that was the genesis of this Bill. The Iranians held US diplomats as hostages for 444 days and US Administrations prevented individual citizens from suing the Iranian Gov’t or seizing Iranian assets. The US claimed that Libya was behind the Lockerbie bombing but it was never sued although Gaddafi under threat of UN sanctions paid a settlement to the families of the victims. This Congress put politics before country in an effort to deliver one final black eye to the President of the USA
In passing this bill the US Congress is playing with fire not only is it abandoning the concept of “Sovereign Immunity” but it will have far reaching implications beyond Saudi Arabia. It is opening the doors for any country to sue US military or civilians criminally or civilly all over the world and the US has a presence in many countries. e.g. a few years ago a CIA agent shot three Pakistanis to death in Lahore, the Pakistanis wanted to bring him to trial but the Americans claimed diplomatic status for the agent and he was released after payment of money to the relatives of the deceased. It seems the concept of “blood money” is now coming to America but be assured other countries are watching and will want their pound of flesh economically and politically.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/feb/20/cia-agent-lahore-civilian-deaths
Congress overrode the veto to spite Obama….and will now pay the price….unless they walk back the override…lol
@Sargeant
Surprised you have not offer detail comment that it was a bipartisan vote.
Well Well
This cannot be walked back
It was right to have overrode the veto.
This should have been done long before. It will contribute to world peace and exposed the Saudis as a terrorist state they have always been. They should learn how the slaves of the Americans are treated, in the end.
It is the beginning of the end for this criminal state, both of them.
Stop looking at things with too much sensitivity about this Black boy in a White house. He does not see things in those terms. So why should we to defend him. Everything does not have to evolve around that. He was no use to us anyhow.
@ Sargeant
While it is the Purveyor of Souls what you have said about this final act of punishment against Obama by his Republican Congress is absolutely true.
They do not care what its implications are, this act was contra Obama.
Small minded men embarked on an all out campaign that seeks to put a purile man next to the nuclear codes AT ALL COSTS.
Orchestrating civil anarchy much like in their movies Purge just to create the impression that the current administration is (a) incredibly so, responsible for the murders, why even here our bajan white Lawson parroting that inance concept (b) incapable of solving it BUT SMALL HANDS DONALD CAN cuause he gine mek america great again and (c) Killery (who is responsible for Bill’s doggie) and the Kenyan Obama who is a buller and his wife is a transvestite (apparently dem is de Republican rumours circulating) once replaced by The Donald, everything going back and WE GOING MEK AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
Either which way Sargeant, we are going to war, one way or the next.
“…And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them. 8And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. 9And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves. 10And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth…”
For they have ears and hear not and they have eyes and see not…
@Sargeant, absolutely excellent article at 8:00 AM.
If one grandly extrapolates from this congressional action to wit “In passing this bill the US Congress is playing with fire not only is it abandoning the concept of “Sovereign Immunity” but it will have far reaching implications beyond Saudi Arabia” then it is reasonable to determine that Trump WILL be the next president of the USA.
If sensible Democratic representatives and indeed similar sensible Republican reps could cave in order to “… put politics before country” we can be assured this matter will be prosecuted over the next 30+ days as a Trump style show of power and strength, and Obama/Clinton weakness.
One conservative pundit had noted that a key issue in this election must be Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA). I was initially surprised as the US really have no ‘new’ military forces enforcing an armed presence currently…now, I grasp his deeper meaning considering that Trump wants to use ground troops to finish ISIS; considering ramification from those drone strikes; considering more Japanese angst when soldiers rape their women and on we go.
All because the US decide they can sue another country for the actions of its citizens: penny-wise and pound foolish.
It is indeed “one of the most irresponsible acts” of the US political directorate.
The US electorate will now likely complete the double and elevate Mr Trump!
This should be right in his wheel-house to beat up on ‘allies’. so I would be shocked if at the debates he does not raise this and Saudi Arabia threats (action in next few days maybe) to dis-invest from the US financial markets with their billions.
So right now he looks to be on curse for Washington via the real presidential suite…sigh!!!!
Piece
Your are wrong.
They are men you are looking to cover their asses, get reelected.
While Obama goes off into a billionaire’s post-retirement, these people merely want to be re-elected.
@Pieces I missed your post, otherwise I would have saved my breath at 9:43.
I all de way here and you all de way there wherever those may be and we drinking the same water. De war must be already starting!!
@David
I believe that my reference to Congress covered both Parties, the only legislator who voted against the Veto was Harry Reid and he is retiring. I am surprised that no members of the CBC voted against the Veto but they probably got their marching orders from Nancy Pelosi (we don’t want to expose the Democrats to any backlash because of this vote).
Pacha…I am not too sure, maybe his actions will be the legends of a positive history.
Of course I agree that both countries have the same dirty hands.
Look ladies and gents.
I do get the rationale behind why all of the Republicans rallied behind the veto because of (b) party interests and (b) self interests and not breaking that party line.
But, in the face of all this “sovereign immunity” issues there is one thing that we have seemingly forgotten – Bin Laden!!
Whereas the single target and prosecution and extermination of the so called mastermind of 9/11 ended? with his Terminate with Extreme Prejudice what this Pandora Box of multiple legal prosecutions does is give thousands of investigative teams the license and support of multiple teams to unravel the true persons behind the 9/11 incident.
I hold no brief for the Purveyors of Souls to the degree that all life is sacred and, irrespective of my absolute indoctrination and allegiance to ***, what i do know is that many people are now shitting bricks because of what this portends.
And yes, the truth will set us free but WHEN THE TRUTH BEHIND THIS IS EXPOSED what BHO sought to do as his final act of veto will become clearer.
Some truths are best left hidden and this 9/11 is more a conflagration that who killed JFK though technically both are (said to be) the same
Barry O on Hillary, believe him?????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6f4tZFZ_-g
Piece
Again. While we encourage our enemies to destroy themselves we have to remembers that it is the Americans themselves who are the masterminds of global terrorism. The poor Saudis only provide the money, the backward ideology, the men. Everything else serves imperium.
We now know that at even at 9/11 nuclear devices were used in the explosions. See Fitzer’s work on this.
It recently started in Afghanistan, but before the Americans the wicked British were involved with the Muslim Brotherhood to serve their empire through terrorism in the region.
As so on.
very funny video MB hopefully trump uses it in his ads
“Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right – INRI September 29, 2016 at 11:26 AM #
Look ladies and gents.
I do get the rationale behind why all of the Republicans rallied behind the veto because of (b) party interests and (b) self interests and not breaking that party line”
I wonder if it is the same rationale that caused the majority of Democrats not to rally behind and vote for the landmark civil rights legislation passed under democratic President Lyndon Johnson with the support of the majority of Republicans.
Piece…2 party systems like to plat tag teams wuth taxpayers…at one time Repugnants were the party oretending to care about civil rights and Black people while the Democrats wore their white sheetss committed to lynching Black people…but then, they switched roles.
The Democrats decided they would look better pretending to care about civil rights and Black people and the Repugnants decided they would look much better in white sheets and more committed to lynching Black people…but not so deep within the Democratic party are the ultra conservatives who are Repugnants at heart….none can be trusted.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/stasi-body-job-not-fat-shaming-article-1.2811665
Another perspective on Drumpf and the ms. universe winner…lol hahaha lol.
I am sure Drumpf tried to get that then beauty into bed and she went “yewwwww”…..lol hahaha, lol.
http://ow.ly/qNlF304Ha9t
Plenty jokes.
http://ow.ly/b8le304Hapk
Pacha…as we were discussing.
@Piece at 11:26 AM … I would respectfully suggest a different angle re your contention that “…what this Pandora Box of multiple legal prosecutions does is give thousands of investigative teams the license and support of multiple teams to unravel the true persons behind the 9/11 incident.” I expect that many of these matters -anything meaningful anyhow – can be shut under the guise that deep details ‘stray’ into the area of national security.
Yes of course there are already gov’t reports available for reference and some characters can be found to ‘blow a whistle’ so there surely will be more grist for the conspiracy theories…but hard evidence of a Saudi gov’t being complicit,..I doubt. Anyone who can validate that is likely already dead, well-hidden or contracted for death.
Furthermore there is a possible final stage option viz ” a little-discussed provision of the bill allows the attorney general to intervene in the lawsuits and get a judge to stay any settlement as long as there are continuing discussions with the Saudis about a possible resolution.”
But to your earlier point about spiting Obama – which is actually quite mutually inclusive to @Pacha’s point about reelection – I imagine you have all seen the RIDICULOUS games people play based on today’s report.
“There were swift complications. Within hours of their vote, nearly 30 senators signed a
letter expressing some reservations about the potential consequences of the law, including the
prospect that the United States could face lawsuits in foreign courts “as a result of important
military or intelligence activities.”…DUHH!
And Senate Leader McConnell had the frigging temerity to say: “I told the president the other day that this is an example of an issue that we should have talked about much earlier. It appears as if there may be some unintended ramifications of that and I do think it’s worth further discussing. But it was certainly not something that was going to be fixed this week.”
There is the stupid spite…and he calls himself a leader of his country. Bunch of wild-boys, as someone here said, trying to do a man’s job!
Lord, come for your world!
Well Well
Glad you now see.
The Saudis made a set of big gamble, not only with oil, but more geo-strategically, and they are losing badly, on all fronts.
They are the most ignorant people we’ve ever met. Nuff money, but no sense, none at all.
Typical disease when you did not have to work hard to attain wealth—-evidenced by Lotto Winners, massive inheritors etc who have very poor stats regarding longevity, happiness etc
Pacha,..that’s what happens when ya lazy and want to turn other humans into slaves for your own profit. .it might take thousands or hundreds of years, but karma will get ya.
There is a lesson in there, but some will be too arrogant to see it.
HILARY DEFINITELY has Parkinsons AND JACKSONIAN FITS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lChM8R9Zbb0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a60kchXkiAI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhcRR_c-adU
DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTIC RESTING TREMOR OF PARKINSON”S and L-DOPA DYSKINESIA
DISPLAYS SWALLOWING DISORDERS OF PARKINSON”S AND ITS TREATMENT
WEAKNESS IN THE LEGS
SHE MAKS THE PILL ROLLING TREMOR BUT CANT MASK OTHER FEATURES LIKE FREEZES
THIS IS SOLID MEDICINE—-IT CANT BE REFUTED
MORE INFO ON HILARY’S PARKINSON SHOWING LATERAL STRABISMUS
HER PROBLEM IS GETTING WORSE THIS IS A DOWN HILL COURSE
THIS IS NOT GOOD NEWS
HILARY’S PRIVATE HOSPITAL
HILARY IS OBVIOUSLY VERY ILL IF SHE NEEDS A DOCTOR HOVERING AROUND ALL THE TIME
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXwSFTxhu0
HER CONDITION IS ADVANCING AND SHE KNOWS IT
“In passing this bill the US Congress is playing with fire not only is it abandoning the concept of “Sovereign Immunity” but it will have far reaching implications beyond Saudi Arabia.”
Far reaching implications for who and even so why should this bother you or is it because it is a bipartisan vote and you cannot cast blame only on the Republicans.
Would you not find it offensive if a foreigner chides our legislators for passing a law which they think is in the interest of their citizens
@charles skeete at 6:19 PM # you are citing the quote noted in blogger’s @Sargeant’s post but apparently you are not reading the narrative before and after the quoted words.
The far reaching implications are for AMERICANS. Particularly the military and by extension the USA govt.
Please note the comments of 30% of the US Senators who were political cowards on the Senate floor and then immediately afterwards found some spine to basically said, ‘Oh dear, I don’t think we should have passed that legislation we could get shafted in foreign courts now too’.
It is not foreigners who are doing the chiding, after the fact. It is the leader of the US Senate and 30 + 1 (who voted against) of his colleagues.
That is the absolute epitome of dereliction of duty. The average soldier would be sent directly to the brig and court marshaled had he acted as they did.
Unbelievable!!
Charles Skeete
OK! So it seems that you consider that the highlighted comment should be offensive to the Americans? Yuh realize dat dis is a 21st century discussion by mainly anonymous posters so practically anything goes.
You ever considered that Obama might just have a better grasp on what is in the best long term interest of the US citizenry than a congress whose members have been largely displaying utter short term self interest and an anti-Obama penchant rather than seeking to identify and promote the bests interests of their citizens over the last 2 administrations headed by Obama?
Yuh ever considered dat de whole ting might be an example of those pieces of legislation that are passed for some obscure purpose that is actually counter to their stated objectives? That it might be really only smoke and mirrors as well as an example of there being more in the mortar than the pestle?
But you did have a very interesting earlier post in which you said: ” I wonder if it is the same rationale that caused the majority of Democrats not to rally behind and vote for the landmark civil rights legislation passed under democratic President Lyndon Johnson with the support of the majority of Republicans. “
Care to explain, especially since it was reported today that many of the republicans who voted to override the veto are now having second thoughts about it and seeking to reverse it?
“Care to explain, especially since it was reported today that many of the republicans who voted to override the veto are now having second thoughts about it and seeking to reverse it?”
If it is indeed so goes to show that the Republicans votes are guided by self interests and are not really anti Obama.
@are-we-there-yet
Will repeat comment directed at Sargeant earlier, it was a bipartisan vote.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Barbados Underground wrote:
>
“You ever considered that Obama might just have a better grasp on what is in the best long term interest of the US citizenry than a congress whose members have been largely displaying utter short term self interest and an anti-Obama penchant rather than seeking to identify and promote the bests interests of their citizens over the last 2 administrations headed by Obama?”
Definitely not. He is even second guessing himself on his main foreign policy achievement note I say achievement 0of withdrawing troops from Iraq by gradually increasing troop levels again.
Looka Mr Skeete
Bloggers Are We There Yet and De Word aka de pedantic Dribbler is logical menses.
De ole man ent gifted like dem and cant do dem logical progression tingses, I is jes a conspiracist, an an ingrunt one at dat
Suppose dat Cheney and Bush is responsible for de 9/11 Northwood type fiasco.
Suppose dat over de course of the years dat, given the fact that war has been in these places over and away and dat, even though you were party to de fiasco 15 years ago, and that you funded it, that you provided training, a venue, and that that you were responsible for harbouring or providing a proxy for the perpetuators of the crime, suppose that you did not then anticipate the bloodbath that now attends your shores and those proximate to your shores, suppose now that you are waivering?
Suppose dat I, as president for 8 years, now being privy to de actions of dese hypothetical war criminals, and more specifically am intimately knowledgeable of the allegiances, and changing mindset of the erstwhile collaborators, suppose that I am now aware, unlike my Congress, that dem fellows gine expose all de innards of the conspiracy?
Jes suppose dat BHO ent really an idiot and he realise where dis shy&#e got de potential to lead and to destroy already fragile State Collaborations when it is definitively proven that dem Two World Trade Towers was not brought down by Bin Laden but by ***, you unnerstand why dem fellers starting to see de error uh dem ways?
You really tink dat this is about brownie points and voting along party lines?
If that is your belief sir de ole man wishes you well and would advise dat i got a few bridges down by de constitution river in Bridgetown dat is good revenue generators since dem is toll bridges and I wants to sell dem and is wondering if you, or anybody dat you know, is interested.
Piece, your writing does be sweeeet fah days sometimes yuh know.
“I is jes a conspiracist, an an ingrunt one at dat”
Me too and I know the world is run by ill-gotten gains and the ill-gotten gains are generated through multinational businesses and white collar crimes but I am also a realist and up to now am not blind and was not blind when I saw the planes crash into the world Trade centre and Bush and Cheney are still alive and could not have been piloting those planes.
What is realism?
http://ow.ly/BxeX304HPVv
Drumpf. ..the great white savior…lol
@ Mr. Skeete,
yes, and wid drone technology, some planes does fly demselves lololol.
Dere is a fellow here called Pachamama.
He is a fellow dat I am very afraid of cause of the “breath and width and depth” of his posts.
Whereas de ole man does tek parts of Ludlum and Clancy and weave together stories, dat man does read profusely and deep books dem and comprehensive topics.
Now he mention a name Jim Fetzer (you should google James H. Fetzer) and do some reading pun dat man.
I musee see he name in a Clancy novel causing de ole man doan read. (Playboy is not considered reading, you know that you are totally out of it when the trite magazines you are referencing probably dont even exist no more)
But it is not the single name that Pachamama has mentioned here from time to time, nor the timbre of multiple articles dat Pachamama does write, but it is the collected mosaic that he creates with his pieces
Now poor me is only a paperback espionage man (or a hollywood man) but dat man does be reading dem literature and ting and dun got a file at de US embassy
I will advise that, if you do want another “plausible??” perspective on this multinational business framework of which you speak, that Fetzer man MAY BE of interest to you.
But, like de ole man say, dem is heavy topics and I does have difficulty doing even dese stoopid posters
@ Lawson and all de trumpeteers
Wunna dun see de BBC article bout trup and he illegal dealings in Cuba??
De ole man dun tell wunna dat between now and November dere s going be some ingrunce dat the Donald going do that is going to sink his ship permanently.
I jed hope dat it doan cause Chad to slap nobody daughter when dat man Donald crash dive…
@Charles Skeete
The name is new but the thoughts are the same, I can write about whatever subject that catches my fancy, If you were reading the comments on this blog you will realize that I didn’t bring up the subject of the Veto but I just thought that I should provide a different perspective on the subject.
BTW the Party of Lincoln is now the Party of Trump
I hope you regain your equilibrium
Harry Reid has a view of Trump and his Republican backers.Harry Reid refers to Trump as the Welfare King(sounds familiar here in Barbados)and further calls him the GOP’s Swindler-in-Chief(again sounds familiar in Barbados)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/harry-reid-gop-obama_us_57ed1c78e4b082aad9b97321
Leona Helmsley (The Queen of Mean) was pilloried for saying “we don’t pay taxes, only the little people pay taxes”. Now another tax avoiding millionaire is saying he is “smart” for not paying taxes. This means the people who are lining up to support him can only be described as chumps because they are paying the freight while he is enjoying life on their dime.
Richard Nixon released his tax returns while he was under audit, Trump’s returns prior to 2009 are not subject to an audit and he can release those but he didn’t pay taxes during those years if the evidence from previous years is any guide. Public documents show Trump didn’t pay any Federal Income tax in 1977,1978 and 1984. He also didn’t pay any taxes for two years during the 1990’s, all of this information was unearthed because he released tax returns for Casino licenses and lawsuits
SARGEANT
RE Now another tax avoiding millionaire is saying he is “smart” for not paying taxes.
LISTEN AGAIN HE DID NOT SAY THAT
let hilary release her emails and her heath notes before Trump releases his taxes
sARGE
CAN YOU RECOGNIZE THE SYMPTOMS OF PARKINSON’S DISEASE
CAN YOU RECOGNIZE THE SYMPTOMS OF TERTIARY SYPHILIS
CAN YOU SEE THE GUMMA ON THE PATIENT’S TONGUE
WHAT DIAGNOSIS DOES THAT MAKE YOU THINK OF”
SARG
DO YOU SEE THE CHARACTERISTIC RESTING TREMOR OF PARKINSON”S and L-DOPA DYSKINESIA
DO YOU SEE THE DISPLAYS SWALLOWING DISORDERS OF PARKINSON”S AND ITS TREATMENT
DO YOU SEE THE DISPLAYS OF WEAKNESS IN THE LEGS
DO YOU SEE THE DISPLAYS OF THE MASKING OF THE PILL ROLLING TREMOR OF PARKINSON”S and L-DOPA DYSKINESIA
DO YOU SEE THE OTHER FEATURES LIKE FREEZINGS OR THE LATERAL STRABISMUS
THIS IS SOLID MEDICINE—-IT CANT BE REFUTED
REMEMBER DR GEORGIE WAS RIGHT IN 2010
YA TINK HE RIGHT AGAIN
RE charles skeete September 29, 2016 at 8:00 PM #
“You ever considered that Obama might just have a better grasp on what is in the best long term interest of the US citizenry than a congress whose members have been largely displaying utter short term self interest and an anti-Obama penchant rather than seeking to identify and promote the bests interests of their citizens over the last 2 administrations headed by Obama?”
I AGREE WID YOU MAN
DAT IS VERY CLEAR FROM HOS “AFFORDABLE CARE” ACT oh me am
Hillary Hates Black People according to Black People!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsQPUG5lNs
ShilLIARy’s new pants suit should be ORANGE!
You GP can criticize Obama from sunrise to sunset but Donald Trump he is indescribable EVERYTHING IS WRONG WITH THAT MAN, The scum bag is not even fit to tie OBAMA Shoes never in the history of Americas presidency have a man running for the top post of commander and chief been so wrong about every issue , Donald Trump accuse Obama as not being born in the USA and Obama answered by showing his birth certificate Hilary accuses Trump as being a tax cheat obama replies he is smart.yet not smart enough to show documentation that Hillary is wrong but what more can any one expect from DT who hates and discriminates against fat people
ac
Trump should show his Tax Returns just after ShilLIARy produces the 33,000 Emails she DELETED! People died because she was so brainless and she could never qualify for security clearance ever again if she was U or I, LOCK her UP! Promote to Pres????????? CRAZY!!!!
Farrakhan destroys Shill!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HI8fpRw_FFA
Ryan & McConnell are prepared to rewrite the legislation after they overrode the Veto. Do these people ever think?
Some Leaders…..
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-09-29/congress-signals-regret-after-overriding-veto-of-saudi-9-11-bill
the justice dept said she made mistakes but nothing she did was indictable or led to her being found guilty of any form of criminality DT trump on national media indicted himself by agreeing with Hilary allegations that he did not pay taxes stating his now famous line “i am smart” never in the history of americas election has a candidate stated that he has cheated the govt, the people would forgive Hilary for her mistakes but the hardworking tax payers would never forgive a billionaire tax cheat and a fraud like DT who uses charitable foundations as a ATM for his personnel treasure