โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by DAVID COMISSIONG, Citizen of Barbados
David Comissiong
David Comissiong

In the editorial entitled โ€œLetโ€™s be fair with Hyatt objectionsโ€ published in the Weekend Nation of Friday the 2nd of September 2016, the Nation editorial- writer admonishes Barbadians like myself who oppose or have reservations about the proposed 15 storey Hyatt Hotel, to engage in thinking that โ€œrepresents the national interest and not personal or narrow parochial or political motives.โ€

The editorial-writer goes on to acknowledge that vacant or available beachfront land is becoming increasingly scarce in Barbados, but then insinuates that the correct response to this situation is for the โ€œregulatorsโ€ to permit the construction of multi-storey hotels or other buildings (higher than six or seven storeys) on the remaining areas of available beachfront property!

Well, I would like to totally disagree with the position of the editorial-writer, and I would like to suggest that the diametrically opposite position that I hold is actually what in the best long term interest of Barbados!ย 

My position is that there are already too many hotels and other buildings constructed on the beaches of Barbados,and that the time has come for our nation to pause and to seriously rethink this policy of permitting the construction of hotels and other permanent structures on our beaches — particularly on those beaches that qualify as truly the most outstanding and beautiful beaches or beachfront areas of our country .

As we are all aware, Barbadosโ€™ number one industry is tourism, and our number one tourism attraction is the beautiful beaches of our country! Well, isnโ€™t it a fact that we have done serious damage to the natural beauty of a vast number of the most outstanding and prized beaches of our country by permitting the construction of hotels and other buildings on these beaches?

Now, the mile long “Durban beach” in Durban, South Africa is reputed to be one of the most beautiful beaches in the world. Do you know how many hotels are built on Durban beach? Not a single one! All of the hotels are located on the land side of the Durban coastal highway!

The same is true of the world famous Copacabana and Ipanema beaches in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil! Indeed, even Miami beach in Florida has a fairly generous setback limitation from the coast, with minimal tourism construction being permitted on the beach side of the coastal highway.

As a matter of fact, manyย  countries have prohibited the construction of hotels on their most prized beaches, and several countries have imposed regulations that severely restrict the height of hotels, whether such hotels are located on the beach or on the land-side of the coastal highway!

Arenโ€™t these policy positions that Barbados would do well to seriously contemplate?

Do we really want to see a Barbados in which our prized beachfront areas are inundated with giant 15 storey hotels?

Are tourists attracted to Barbados because of ultra-modern multi storey American-style hotels? Or isn’t it, rather, that they have an interest in experiencing the unique culture, heritage, social ambience and charm of Barbados and Barbadians? (And in answering this question, please refer to the fact that the single most popular tourist attraction in Barbados is the Oistins Fish Fry!)

I, for one, honestly believe that Barbados has had its fill of hotels on its most prized and popular beaches, and also its fill of foreign-owned hotels!

If it were left up to me, future tourism development in Barbados would feature and be based upon locally owned hotels and guest houses that fit snugly into our environment, and that radiate the unique hospitality, culture and charm of Barbados and Barbadians. That , to me, is what real development is all about– Barbadians doing for self and owning the most precious resources of their own country.

These views might differ from those of the Nationโ€™s editorial-writer, but I can assure him or her that they are not based on a desire to โ€œunfairโ€ anyone, nor on โ€œparochial or political motivesโ€. Rather, they derive form a desire to provoke new thinking on what is in the best long term interest of the one nation that we all share in common.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

118 responses to “Comissiong Responds to Nation Newspaper Editorial – TIME TO RE-THINK POLICY OF BUILDING ON OUR BEACHES”

  1. Violet C Beckles Avatar

    The government and white builders want to run the Natives out the country and replace them with rich white people,
    People need housing. Is it true or not their are more than 30,000 people waiting for housing?at NHC land laundering fraud , Yet we can find money and time to put the tourist on all the beach lines in Barbados , That blocks out the people from seeing and using the ocean with eyes and body.
    The only slave jobs for the people in Bim is making beds and cleaning bathrooms, At a slave wage as they collect USD$ for payment. Service industry in Barbados is nothing more than Slavery at 5$ BDS$ an hour .
    Can you see you give someone an hours work of your Life for a drink? Some drinks are 7$ and more , A sweat bread is 8.10$ and on its way up with more taxes from the Minister MOF and the whites,
    We need to notice when the DBLP dont even like the people they pay to vote for them .
    Time and time again have come to get JOBS for VOTES , buying votes getting on the way very early , No work for the last 4 years for of the Massive land fraud that the IDB , Moodys , S&P will not deal with , let not for get CLICO and Cahill fraudsters still living larges.No refunds on money past in to the pocktes of Ministers ,
    Panama Papers still looming as the Event of Bank of America and other Banks pull out ,
    Gold standard and adjustment of the Elections in America will so what is what as power brokers pull out all the stops.
    The White Dragon Society Watching you all well , Be warned,
    When you hear the shout!


  2. Wow! what part of NOT constructing anything on Browns Beach that most are having a problem understanding? Browns Beach holds some serious HISTORY; That’s where the pilot used to leave from to go out to bring ships in to anchor before their was a Port in Barbados.

    Are you going to just keep building on these beaches and prohibit the BARBADIAN PEOPLE FROM USING THEM? Why not do as these other countries are doing and preserving the beaches for the people’s use, and NOT JUST FOR VISITORS? Are the decision makers this blind,or are they being paid to be blind to the needs of the people?

                     **PLEASE SAVE SOME OF THE BEACHES FOR THE LOCALS**
    

    Honestly I don’t want to believe that the needs of the few out weighs the needs of the many who are AGAINST BUILDING ON BROWNS BEACH; BROWNS BEACH BELONGS TO THE BAJAN PEOPLE. LET THEM HAVE SOMETHING THAT THEY CAN GO TO WHEN THEY FEEL LIKE GETTING A SEA BATH, OR KICKING IT WITH THEIR FRIENDS;

  3. Anonymouse - TheGazer Avatar
    Anonymouse – TheGazer

    If this table was done in a spreadsheet, it may have been more effective to have the last column as percentage increase.

    It would be good if one of the economic gurus could explain why the increases are so drastic?

    The 2016-2017 appropriations are up by $300M. So that the increase over the three past years is by a $100M on average.

  4. Violet C Beckles Avatar

    Anonymouse – TheGazer September 4, 2016 at 4:10 PM @

    As we see it the money was held back to act like the world banking have an real effect on bim, The Game, Now near election time they now look to build all things to make it look like a recovery.
    False Flags coming, Now they want to push , sugar plant, 4 season and Hyatt at the same time, as if no one knows their GAMES,

    JUNE 15 2015 , THE 800 YEARS OF THE MAGNA CARTER , They were talking of the 160Million in new taxes and to bring in another 160Million by the end of that year, Yet we still looking for more money and no improvement in the lives of the people,
    This government holding back for that was their plan as we stated before,

    We not hearing nothing more about Sam Lords , People thinking other people getting work and their time is next,
    Where are the investigative reporters in Barbados , We say they are none, All being paid slave to shut up and pay their Bills,
    So sorry that “Barbados Free Press” is not around to be up dating the news not told in other media houses,


  5. why cant someone build on the eyesores along the boardwalk rather than on a great stretch of beach. Having a place where the locals all congregate is fantastic rather than scattering the populace all over the islands beaches it makes the policeman’s job much easier because he can make an arrest and have a sea bath.


  6. My biggest problem here is that they say it will blend in with the surrounding buildings! Pray tell me, how can such a colussus blend in with anything in the area – starting with Bethel Methodist Church which will be right opposite, and then Mrs. Ram’s building which is right next door. Add to them the St. Paul’s Anglican and Catholic churches, and the whole idea of blending in is nothing but an illusion.


  7. Increase of appropriation grants?

    Simply look who bought the many villas in the gated communities, in Florida, Canada, Switzerland and who became a Wabenzi. No ordinary Barbadian can afford a car for 500,000 BBD.


  8. Don’t panic yet folks………..I doubt that any Hyatt Hotel will be built there anytime in the near future and certainly not before elections due in 2018. A 15 story building cannot be approved for that location without a full and vigorous interrogation of the merits and demerits.


  9. Personally I think the opposition to a massive concrete monstrosity there will inflame the passions of bajans even moreso that Cahill and given his proximity to Government Headquarters would be an ideal location for a massive public meeting to kick of the next general elections.


  10. @David Comissiong

    I began to read the editorial out of interest and from the time I got to the third paragraph where the writer wrote………..

    “we may also add to this what appears now to be an almost immediate objection to or suspicion surroundinganything in which busineman Mark Maloney is involved”…………… I said this writer has thrown all objectivity out of the window.

    The Nation seems to be a self appointed shield and defender of Mark Maloney these days.

    Yes, we want development but at any cost? I always thought that where that IADB was built in Welches should have been a lovely hotel with such a stretch of beach………but an office building is there………why?

    DC, every man is entitled to his views, dont sweat about the Nation’s editorial.


  11. I agree with David that, in general, it would be a good idea to prohibit the construction of hotels directly on the narrow beaches of Barbados, but I would make an exception for an urban hotel like the proposed Hyatt.
    I disagree with David on what most tourists want. The majority of tourists from metropolitan countries who seek a warm weather vacation have little interest in local culture (unless it is Asian), and can only tolerate it in small doses. Several tourist businesses have gone bankrupt because of the lack of widespread enthusiasm for Caribbean culture in North America and Europe. Do not mistake politeness for genuine interest. Do not persuade yourself that because a few visitors like our culture , most of them do. Most North Americans and most Europeans avoid black culture like the plague in their own home countries. If they want to experience an exotic culture, most prefer places like China, India, Thailand, or even Mexico. Black cultures are of interest to only a small minority. If you want to attract more Americans to Barbados, go the Hampton Inn-Pizza Hut-MacDonalds route.


  12. @chad99999

    I disagree with your observation that the majority of northern tourists only seeks warm weather.

    They want more, but they are advised not travel around the countryside. Simply look at:

    https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/country/jamaica.html

    The report on Bim is a bit milder:

    “The U.S. Embassy has directed its staff to avoid the following areas at all times: Crab Hill, St. Lucy and The Ivy, St Michael. The Embassy has also directed its staff to avoid three additional areas at night: Nelson Street, Wellington Street, and Jolly Rogers Cruises. The Embassy has advised its staff to exercise extreme caution in the following areas: New Orleans, Deacons, Black Rock, Pine, Carrington Village, and Green Fields.”


  13. When the US Embassy warns US nationals to avoid certain local entertainment areas, they do so on the basis of feedback from their own people, and on the basis of their informed judgment about what most Americans like and dislike.
    You are confirming my evaluation of tourist preferences.


  14. I say again for the umpteenth time that I agree with DC’s views entirely.The interest of Barbados and Barbadians is paramount.Even before these chop sutters got off the ground the Bastids let it be known that the only jobs Bajans will get are at the bottom and Sealy thinks that is something to boast about in Parliament.That ahzoul forgot Hilton,Radisson and Island Inn are in St Michael and Savannah is on the perimeter of the said parish.Ahzouls.If I had my way an element of cleansing of the minds of some of these parliamentarians will be ordered.

  15. Anonymouse - TheGazer Avatar
    Anonymouse – TheGazer

    @Chad
    ‘and on the basis of their informed judgment about what most Americans like and dislike.”

    wrong again. Who on earth knows what American like or dislike? It is done on the perception of how safe a place is (for American tourists).


  16. Gabriel thank God u do not have your way cause plenty barbadians would be on the bread line and you would be the one looking like a big azhoul.

    If any one ask a Barbadian the question of wanting to see a barbados dominated by barbadians enterprises most would say yes . but in reality most bajans have drop the ball rather than pursue barbados interest pursue their own leaving a wide open door for others to enter. Most never give thought of investing in those things that would give them the full ownership but fall for the sale of self gratification and accomplishment on a scale that is unbalanced with one sided tipping downward while the other side hangs loosely in the air vulnerable and susceptible to interest of another kind
    As for the Hyatt they can stay or leave but the question of how can Bridgetown thrive without any meaningful support needs to be unanswered by those who oppose the project


  17. @Anonymouse – TheGazer

    Agreed. The embassyยดs staff just reads the newspaper, telling them where all the shootings are going on. Most of the places are common knowledge in Bim.


  18. Well, Black Rock and Jolly Rogers Cruises are surprises on the list.


  19. @chad9999

    You obviously do not live in Barbados AND dot not have your ears to the ground.


  20. ac September 4, 2016 at 9:15 PM #

    โ€œAs for the Hyatt they can stay or leave but the question of how can Bridgetown thrive without any meaningful support needs to be unanswered by those who oppose the project.โ€

    @ ac

    Are you suggesting to intelligent Barbadians that Hyatt has the answers to solve Bridgetownโ€™s and, by extension, the entire islandโ€™s economic problems?

    Surely your thoughts on the Hyatt project are not based on โ€œrational reasoning,โ€ but primarily from a partisan perspective. In other words, because the project was conceptualized by the DLP, you feel duty bound to support it.

    After the talk about EIA and all that shiite, if we want to accept it or not, the reality of the situation is the Hyatt hotel will be CONSTRUCTED in the GHETTO.

    And I have not heard anything from this administration to suggest the surrounding areas will be revitalized.

    What are governmentโ€™s plans for the old Fairchild Street market, so as to prevent tourists visiting there to enjoy food and drink offered by the bars that illegally occupy that area, from being confronted with the STRONG AROMA of PISS and SHIT that PERMEATES the atmosphere and NUMEROUS LARGE RATS?

    Will government clean the old marketโ€™s environs, build new kiosks for the vendors operating there and fast track the issuing of the relevant liquor licenses and health certificates, making it possible for them to sell food and beverages in a sanitary, controlled environment?

    Will government demolish the old Empire Theatre and the old National Insurance Building, as well all those derelict buildings in Nelson Street and Bay Street?

    What is going to be done with the โ€œshanty townโ€ that surrounds the river terminal and the vendors in front the Fairchild Street Bus Terminal that leave the place in a mess with rotting fruits and vegetables.

    How about extra streets lights along River Road extending to Queenโ€™s Park and in the park built around the Constitution River.

    AC, tell your DLP administration Bridgetown is very dirty and they have to clean it.


  21. I must admit that Iโ€™m not a tourism expert. But Iโ€™m finding it rather difficult to understand why would an individual from the USA visit or be attracted to a Caribbean island, mainly because that island has a โ€œHampton Inn-Pizza Hut-MacDonalds?โ€

    I always thought tourist visit other countries to experience food, culture, what other tourist attractions are on offer, etc. I can understand visiting the USA to take my son to Disney World, or going to France to see the Eiffel Tower.

    We are all aware that Chefette is โ€œindigenousโ€ to Barbados. What sense would it make for me to pay $500 to travel to St. Vincent, for example, because Halloute opened three (3) Chefettes there?


  22. We need to find a compromise for the Hyatt. What would those who oppose say if the Hyatt decides to opt for Cuba? What suggestions are being made to bring employment to the Urban corridor? Will the Hyatt bring renewal to Ponside and Nelson Street?

    The 52 requirements must be met but Bajans needs to demand proper governance and transparency of projects. Finally, the area behind Bayshore going towards the old Coast Guard Station was never a popular bathing area.

    Barbados needs the FX thus let the conversation continue in the best interest of country for their is no need for confrontation.Vision Investments and the GOB PR sucks and all this noise could have been avoided thru engagement of citizenry.

    Unlike the Cahill Robbery Plant, much more benefits are to be had locally for the foreseeable future under the Hyatt. Thus, I support the Hyatt Centric despite the premature pronouncement of a start date which has been halted by the 52 Town Planning requirements. Bajans need to stop hate Mark Malonely for his assertiveness and his hardn ose attitude. Preferential treatment to political friends is synonymous with both parties to their friends. The blame lies with us who are docile on poor governance and those who have money as their master.

    Since November 2012 Anti Corruption legislation stillborn and Opposition, Bar Association Chamber of Commerce, Church and Senate silent on it.


  23. Most of the meaningful writers above are shying away from the fact that the nation just possibly might be paid to throw their weight behind the Hyatt monstrosity. Who might be the most likely person paying out the money? Why not give a thought to the same Maloney whose dirty fingers are in all the pies.

    The Nation news is sinking to some very low depths in recent times and mostly in their editorials.

    Permit me an aside question that I would like answered: Is the Mexicans the new owners of the Arawak cement plant in St. Lucy bought from Trinidad?


  24. Artax

    You are not thinking.
    Americans come for the white sand beaches, the promise of blue Caribbean water, the warm weather in winter, water sports, and the experience of being on an island, which is a novelty for a lot of people who live in a big country far away from a coastline.
    Most do not want full immersion in a black culture in a relatively poor country. What American brands provide is the reassurance of familiarity in a strange land full of black people thousands of miles from the safety of home. That should be easy for you to understand. Going to St. Vincent from Barbados is not a trip to a different culture, climate and population type.


  25. @ chad99999

    It seems as though you try too hard to complicate issues and โ€œsteerโ€ them within a specific context, which you subsequently interpret so as to demonstrate you are thinking above the average individual. In this instance you have complicated the reasons why people travel, then interpret these reasons to suggest, โ€œMost do not want full immersion in a black culture in a relatively poor country,โ€ without PRESENTING any EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE to SUPPORT your ARGUMENT.

    In other words, you seem to โ€œcreate your own straw men to knock them down.โ€

    You wrote: โ€œIf you want to ATTRACT MORE AMERICANS to Barbados, go the Hampton Inn-Pizza Hut-MacDonalds route,โ€ and โ€œMost do not want full immersion in a black culture in a relatively poor country. What American brands provide is the reassurance of familiarity in a strange land full of black people thousands of miles from the safety of home.โ€

    How would the situation whereby a โ€œHampton Inn-Pizza Hut-MacDonaldsโ€ in Barbados, operating within our culture, under the labour laws of Barbados and full of BLACK PEOPLE (employees and patrons), would provide American tourists with โ€œthe reassurance of familiarity in a strange land full of black people thousands of miles from the safety of home?โ€

    This is a non sequitur, because your former comment does not follow logically from your latter comment.

    Additionally, my comment DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH โ€œGoing to St. Vincent from Barbados is not a trip to a different culture, climate and population type.โ€ I referred to your specific comment by mentioning I WOULD NOT TRAVEL to St. Vincent, FOR EXAMPLE, because Halloute opened three (3) Cheffetes there.

    Okay, to satisfy you, I would not be attracted to another destination primarily because they have products that are indigenous to Barbados.

    What you are essentially suggesting is if Umm al-Quwain, for example, wants to attract more Barbadians, they have to go the Chefette route, because (Barbadian) brands (will) provide (us) with the reassurance of familiarity in a strange land full of (Arab) people thousands of miles from the safety of home.โ€

    Perhaps you are indeed correct… I’m not thinking.

  26. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Chadx9 talks rubbish when he can think of nothing to post…tourism in Barbados SEASONAL, Americans are NOT the number 1 visitors, why would you build a bunch of unhealthy fast food garbage dumps to cater to Americans who are more likely to go to Hawaii, or far in the South Pacific….for vacation…..who in their right minds would leave the US with maybe 5 million fast food joints to go on vacation…..to eat American fast food.

    But what do you expect from someone who supports the nazi candidate Trump.


  27. Sir the Hyatt by extension does not need barbados , However barbados cannot sit and wait around another fifty years looking or trying to find solutions to the economic plight of Bridgetown,
    Furthermore all the niceties and amenities you are asking for to be done or delivered in the surrounding environs of the World heritage centre needs funding , However maybe You can detail in your exuberance financial solutions for the care and repair of all that you are asking for.
    Notice today that since the issue oi the Hyatt has being laid out as a possibility to be built in the WHS there has all of a sudden a quick opening up of the eyes of those who have a vested interest in the WHS after much criticism of the decay situated on the site a rumbling of noise and a concern about a Heritage Site makeover

    Amidst talk that its designation was being underutilized and fears that the island might lose the prestigious award, long-standing member of the Barbados National Trust and the new deputy chairman of the rebranded Heritage Preservation Task Force of Barbados, Sir Paul Altman, has revealed that a number of restoration projects are set to come on stream in Bridgetown.

    it is really shameful on the part of those who are keeping all the opposing noise about the Hyatt that only now after govt has included the Hyatt project to be a factor and be included as having a role to give bridgetown an economic boost ,,it is shameful that these dark shadows would only feel the necessity to have open dialogue about repair and maintenance of the site, Where were these brainaics before ?


  28. The question of Environmental, UNESCO,etc should have already been conducted and there should be a list of places where large hotels are NOT to be located.
    This idea David C has of little local hotels sounds good but is not employed in his beloved Cuba. What Bim should have appreciated years ago is that we have a small overpopulated island and therefore MUST focus on Profit/ tourist like Bermuda, not attracting millions who share a beer. ie focus on middle to upper management types. This has reached a critical level because of the advent of cheap destinations like Dom Republic and now Cuba. Aruba does well and has all the large US Brand name hotels that Bim should have. Aruba has a designated beach, Palm Beach, where all the brand names are located. Bim must decide what strategic positioning we should have and reposition to suit. Competing in the mass market Profitably will become nearly impossible.

    Americans really do love their Pizza Huts, Dominos etc and we should permit some of these chains with local ownership where practical. Bim does need the Reservation systems of these major brands eg Hyatt, Sheraton, Marriot, Wyndham et al. Aruba has them and is a rather boring destination compared with Bim. It is a desert with a few beaches that can not compete with Bim in terms of history, friendliness, architecture and much more. We have to market properly. Having said this we must NOT be over reliant on Tourism but must have the correct Education and Training strategy for the future, especially in Service sectors in which we can build a strong reputation.

    The so called “leaders” are failing the populace.


  29. Good comment Moneybrain.


  30. It is evident that response was not written by the usual โ€œacโ€โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ probably Irene.

    โ€œIn your exuberanceโ€ supporting Hyatt how could you not consider that building a 5 star hotel in a ghetto environment, is similar to man who hasnโ€™t bathe for the past month, wearing a $5,000 suit to a wedding.

    As I mentioned in a previous contribution, your thoughts on the Hyatt project are not based on โ€œrational reasoning,โ€ but primarily from a partisan perspective. In other words, because the project was conceptualized by the DLP, you feel duty bound to support it.

    The area surrounding the proposed Hyatt site is dirty and you asking about detailing โ€œfinancial solutions for the care and repairโ€ of the said environment is nothing more than a cop out. Government found $7M for the 50th anniversary independence celebrations and they solicited funds for the revitalization of Sam Lordโ€™s Castle.

    Since Hyatt is not making an actual direct investment in the project, perhaps you could ask Richard or Irene to solicit funds from that company to assist in cleaning up the environment.

    Common sense should tell you that tourists will not come to Barbados, pay US$500 per night for a room in a hotel to be confronted by a filthy environment, especially in areas where food and beverages are sold.

    THEY WILL USE TRIP ADVISOR TO ALERT THEIR FRIENDS.

    But then again, you probably interpreted governmentโ€™s abolishing of โ€œcommon centsโ€ to mean you should not have โ€œcommon sense.โ€

    Itโ€™s about time you begin to โ€œthink outside the DLP box.โ€


  31. Artax September 5, 2016 at 10:10 AM #

    Common sense should tell you that tourists will not come to Barbados, pay US$500 per night for a room in a hotel to be confronted by a filthy environment, especially in areas where food and beverages are sold.

    //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

    So are you then stating or one can conclude from your above statement that Hyatt Corporation did not take all that which you have mentioned into consideration before agreeing to the proposed building site.
    Again your exuberance might have got the best of your commonsense since commonsense would have told you that the Hyatt Corporation is not a fly by night operation and take all business proposal as a serious matter
    Hence your poking to ridicule shows how little you know about the day to day operations and business plans of the Hyatt Who by the way has built more than over……….

    Hyatt Corporation is one of the leading hotel companies in North America. Owned by the Pritzker family of Chicago, Hyatt manages or licenses the management of 87 hotels and 16 resorts (with a total of 55,000 rooms) in 83 cities in the United States, Canada, and the Caribbean. In addition to its resorts, Hyatt has also developed other special hotel conceptsโ€”the Grand Hyatt, the Park Hyatt, and Classic Residence by Hyatt. Grand Hyatts are large-scale, higher priced hotels located in culturally rich cities, with three in the United States (New York, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C.). Park Hyatts are modeled after small European hotels and are located in Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. The Classic Residence by Hyatt properties offer luxury retirement apartments for rental. Starting in the mid-1990s, the company has also sought growth opportunities in franchising, time-share properties, free-standing golf courses, and casinos.
    Employees: 47,000
    Sales: $3 billion (1994 est.)

    Maybe you should do your homework before shooting political barbs up down and across the hall ways of BU


  32. Hahahahahaha!!!

    So, you did YOUR homework and โ€œthumping your chestโ€ by presenting data on Hyatt that is TWENTY-TWO (22) years old.

    And this gives you AUTHORITY to โ€œknow about the day to day operations and business plans of the Hyatt.โ€

    โ€œHence, (Iโ€™m justified in my) poking to ridiculeโ€ฆโ€ฆ.โ€

    Just to remind you of the irrelevance of your outdated information, as recent as 2014 Hyatt sold 38 of its properties, consisting of Hyatt Place and Hyatt House hotels totaling 4,950 rooms, to a company organized by Lone Star Funds.

    Once again you have proven beyond reasonable doubt you are just a political yard-fowl who is unable to think rationally and outside the confines of DLP political rhetoric.


  33. So what! are you disputing the facts by stating that Hyatt sold 38 properties still not mindful of the fact that Hyatt sale does not in any way undermine is credibility and prestigious profile in the building and management of its hotel
    For peak sake try not to be petty in your exuberance to show data which does not in any way affects the brand and credibility of the Hyatt Corporation,.
    So what if over a twenty year period they sold 38 properties while purchasing other properties tell me in what way does your data affect the relevancy of the Hyatt Corporation a proven business model


  34. And By the way do not fool ourselves into thinking that those sale of properties were a mismanagement by the Hyatt Corporation For what is worth their are investors who find the Hyatt name to be lucrative and wants a piece of the piece to which Hyatt agrees


  35. @ Artax (on AC)
    “….Once again you have proven beyond reasonable doubt you are just a political yard-fowl who is unable to think rationally and outside the confines of DLP political rhetoric.”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Skippa, when will you tire of proving the obvious…over and over..?
    How many different ways do you need to show that sugar is sweet?
    What is it that you find so fascinating about a jackass’ mind….?

    Could it be that you “wants a piece of the piece to which Hyatt agrees” ..
    ….whatever the shiite THAT means….

    Rrrrahhhhhh ha ha ha
    LOL
    muh belly…

  36. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    ACs…it’s very unattractive to be bending over kissing ass and defending people who you do not know and who do not know you……tasteless and tacky,

    I remember when you were kissing C. Fred’s ass, it was nauseating then and it’s nauseating now.

    No one is going to allow you and the retards in parliament to sell them out because you are so impressed with a lot of zeros.., ya too cheap.


  37. Face the fact that the data you presented is OLD and IRRELEVANT and you have not provided any evidence to substantiate the claims you made about Hyatt.

    Or are your comments based on your experience “administrating and managing a large company” you alluded to re: ac March 20, 2016 at 1:32 PM #

    By the way, I see you have learnt a new word…. “exuberance.” Use cautiously and wisely.

    You may have the last word.

  38. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    “This idea David C has of little local hotels sounds good but is not employed in his beloved Cuba.”

    The difference is MoneyB, Cuba has shares in most if not all of the brand name hotels in Cuba….Barbados has sold it’s shares in just abuut EVERYTHING on the island….but Cuba is the one had 50 years of sanctions.., so something is not working for Barbados, they are doing the same thing all the time and expect different results….I still dont think tourists leave their country and go on vacation to eat the same food they left at home…

    …..am still to meet tourists who do not want to try local dishes for their duration in another country, anything but what they are accustomed to…..


  39. Ok sir you have resorted to your usual attacks which has all but shown up the weakness of your argument and a proselyte of half of truths and ridiculous arguments


  40. @ Bushie

    Honestly, Bushie, I find it fascinating that people could be so loyal to a political party to the point they believe politicians are perfect and can do no wrong or make mistakes, thereby elevating mere mortals to the status of God. And believe they are duty bound to support any initiative conceptualized by those men, even into the realm of stupidity, thinking it is normal to engage in such actions.


  41. Bush Tea September 5, 2016 at 12:10 PM #

    Skippa, when will you tire of proving the obviousโ€ฆover and over..?

    Hey Professor Brass bowl

    Bossman you out of the viagara time for a refill

    http://healthcaremall4you.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/viagra-professional-100-mg.png


  42. Sir you came here to bring data for whatever reason to prove nothing!after i provided evidence to substantiate that Hyatt accumulation of several hotels and properties is proficient in the management and branding of its hotel
    However what you tried to do was to try to dilute my argument by using data to suggest that hyatt sale of properties was a red marking or a proof that the Hyatt brand was not strong in their management style so hence sale of properties
    Any one proficient and knowledgeable in business and marketing would understand that a Brand such as Hyatt can be attractive after may years of proven success enough that an outside investor might want to acquire such a brand to add to their profile 1. which can be an asset or to enhance their further business prospects .2, added credibility .3 give them stronger leverage acquiring financing
    The question therefore should be what would Hyatt has to lose by selling those properties if the answer is one of negativity then there is a redflag warning which should be brought to mind regarding failure or a weakening of the Hyatt brand however so far the Brand still remains stable and no cries in the business market has hoisted the red flag
    well except here on barbados Underground

    Hyatt Hotels Corp., controlled by the billionaire Pritzker family of Chicago, is in talks to sell some properties as it weighs purchases in the most attractive markets for expanding its brands, Chief Executive Officer Mark Hoplamazian .

    Unlike its peers, Hyatt is strategic about property sales rather than fully embracing an asset-light strategy. If it does sell properties, expect it to invest in others in a market where the real estate is not as overvalued.


  43. Four Seasons lent its name to Paradise Beach project.


  44. Let me try to explain this point as simple as is possible, so that even you may be able to understand.

    You are arguing the point that Bridgetown needs to Hyatt hotel to boost economic activity in the city, which would benefit vendors, taxi operators and stores. I cannot disagree with this argument.

    The environs of the old Fairchild Street market is surrounded by old unkempt and unoccupied shanties, which make perfect โ€œliving quartersโ€ for rats, cock-roaches and other vermin/rodents.

    It is a known fact (NOT HALF TRUTH) that 95% of the vendors operate illegally and in unsanitary conditions in that area. Hence, they will not be in possession of the relevant health and liquor licenses. Therefore, food and beverages are not being sold in accordance with health regulations, especially where vendors are required to produce a doctorโ€™s certificate before being deemed fit and granted the relevant license to sell food.

    The old Fairchild Street market is in close proximity to the proposed Hyatt site.

    Tourists visiting this area will be confronted with the site of rats running around in search of food and the aroma of piss and shit permeating the atmosphere, because both men and women piss indiscriminately due to the lack of toilet facilities.

    Tourists usually โ€œsolicitโ€ the services of Trip Advisor to warn friends, relatives and potential tourist about terrible experiences they encounter in any destination.

    ALL I AM SUGGESTING IS THAT THE AREA SHOULD BE CLEANED, VENDORS GIVEN THE APPROPRIATE LICENSES AND SANITARY CONDITIONS (INCLUDING KIOSK) FROM WHICH TO PLY THEIR TRADE.

    You mentioned government does not have money to clean the environment and Hyatt would have known about the unsightly and unsanitary conditions in the surrounding area before agreeing to โ€œset up shop.โ€

    Even Todd, Reggie Hunte or Jester Ince would have understood what I was trying to explain.

    Your response by all means has โ€œshown up the weakness of your argument and a proselyte of half of truths and ridiculous arguments.โ€


  45. No, no, no, no!!!

    I presented that information to indicate Hyatt does not have the same number of hotels as suggested by the 22 year old information you posted, thereby proving its irrelevancy.

    You do not have any intimate knowledge of Hyattโ€™s operations; if you had, you would have presented the evidence.

    Your responses to this issue are based primarily on speculation and political rhetoric in an effort to defend the DLPโ€™s choice.


  46. My final response to you on this issue is, if David Commisiong, Mia Mottley, Heather Cole, David BU, Bush Tea or PUDRYR or any other individual who is not affiliated with the DLP had conceptualized the Hyatt project, you would post multiple contributions in protest, forgetting about jobs, foreign exchange and economic development, while focusing on the importance of that site as world heritage.

    You are a hypocrite.


  47. David, et al (Artax, Gabriel, Prodigal, Miller, Well among others of similar ilk).
    Why was the old Hilton imploded and a completely new one built? Has Commissiong examined the plans for Needham’s Point Development/ Why has he never objected to the new hotel? Is his objection simply the building of the Hyatt, or is it the fact it would be located on Brown’s Beach? Should anything be built on that beach?
    I am tired of the negativity that is given an audience on this blog.
    Do ANY of you have positive ideas that you can elucidate here?


  48. Alvin Cummins September 5, 2016 at 1:43 PM #

    โ€œI am tired of the negativity that is given an audience on this blog..โ€

    @ Alvin

    Spare yourself the stress by not logging onto to BU.

    However, I must remind you that the DLP and ESPECIALLY Denis Kellman, were very critical when the then BLP administration announced plans to demolish the old Hilton to build a new one.

    Go and come again.


  49. Sir i understood all that you have said and also understand your insistence of applying the poltical spin to the argument, what you seem not to understand by way of my reply is that i am pointing out that the business model of a Hyatt would not be oblivious to the surroundings before agreeing to the building site and most likely with all parties in agreement would have already decided or stipulated who will be responsible and how the area would be cleaned up Sir as i have already pointed out by way of presenting the public profile of the Hyatt Brand that their model of doing business is impeccable so behooves me or it should of any one to believe that sanitation problems in and surrounding their properties would not be of major concern before Hyatt signs on the dotted line
    Btw still not understanding your reasoning or rationale by presenting data of hyatt property sale when the issue was mounted on a Hyatt barbados site and the maintenance of the site and surroundings

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading