← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Ronald Jones, Minister of Education
Ronald Jones, Minister of Education

I believe that it is time to speak out on certain matters. It may take me more than one column to say these things but I am not committing to having a page or a slot. Just for background information for those who may not know, I recently retired from the teaching service at the level of Deputy Principal, after serving as Acting Principal for 18 months, a post which I really could never achieve, being labelled a ‘troublemaker” and more recently a “devil” by the powers that be. Why? The status quo, as corrupt as it may be, must be maintained! But more on that later.

Years ago when I was P.R.O. and then President of the B.S.T.U. this issue of violence against teachers raised its head and from then till now, some 18 years later. Successive Ministries of Education under various Ministers, the worst being the present, have failed to grapple with the issue, and like most other things in this country, it has remained under the carpet. This is a country where if you don’t toe the line you are out in the cold. Are we going to wait until a teacher is killed to deal with it? I accept that due process and investigation must take place, however, that having been done the next steps need to be taken:

  • The Board of Management needs to decide if the child is to be further suspended, expelled or sent back to school.
  • The Ministry then takes the Board’s recommendation and either accepts or rejects it and rightly so, then make their own determination.
  • The child has to be expelled from that school and not from the educational system as some people would want to determine. This is because the teacher involved and the student cannot exist in the same environment simultaneously. It would leave the student as a hero, something which I have seen done on several occasions.
  • The Ministry needs to seriously put in place that special institution which has been spoken about for many years. It should be run by the Defence Force personnel and have strict guidelines in relation to an alternative syllabus for such students who offer this category of violence to a teacher or even their parents.

Let it be clear that I am not suggesting that teachers are always right and children always wrong because that would be far from the truth. There have been instances where teachers have caused things upon themselves due to the inability to cope with certain personalities in the classroom. Some teachers were not born to be teachers but end up doing it out of necessity. On the other hand, when we analyse why certain children display very unsociable behaviours, as is being suggested as a remedy, what happens afterwards? One guidance counsellor per secondary school of 1000 children is adequate? One psychologist at the Ministry is enough? Abolishing corporal punishment is the answer? The countries which have taken that approach are in more trouble than we are now, and may be looking to reinstate it. But look! There is a teacher who flogged children illegally for years, was warned on several occasions, but was just given a Deputy post at a hot school. Wow!

What about the new rantings and ravings of the Minister? Can you imagine a Minister taking up a portfolio which contains important mandates as written in the Education Act and only after 8 years, comes out to say that he never liked Corporal Punishment. What is even worse is that he has insulted all Principals, Deputies and Senior Teachers by implying that they should all be locked up for assault. I wonder what BAPPSS’s response will be, being the soft organisation that it is, one which, in keeping with the requirements of being attached to any government agency, must “toe the line” and play down many of the issues which plague our system. Things that happen at the so-called low schools happen at the high schools too but “no press allowed”. Maybe one should wonder why the rules which govern secondary schools are not standardized, (I don’t mean on paper.) Each school almost does as it likes. What do I mean? In some schools, teachers must write a letter whenever absent, others not. In some schools Principals are not even informed about decisions made by the Board, even though he is supposed to be the CEO on the compound. They don’t even get to browse the Smart Stream system to know how much money was allocated, where and how it is being spent. In others, that is the norm. Talking about Boards, would you believe that at a school, corporate governance has allowed a Deputy Chairman of the Board to be on that same entity along with his wife who is the Secretary Treasurer? Of course one is not to even ask about things like those and that is why both the writer and the current Principal were recently labelled ‘Devils” for asking about it. Not only that! The previous principal, (notice the small letter) complained to the Ministry for me because I asked too many questions about the Status Quo like: Why are teachers from this parish getting to school late so often? Do you send monthly reports to the Ministry? Why do certain teachers have 18 & 19 non-teaching lessons? How is it that certain people come and go on the compound with much frequency but with your permission? Why are certain teachers in your office for long periods during the day and you are never available for matters on the compound which the Deputy must make decisions on? I would never forget the day there was a fire above the school and children were having asthmatic attacks and the writer was chastised for being asked by teachers what to do. He didn’t even have a clue what was going on. He asked if the teachers think I am “our saviour” because lives had to be saved without his initiative.

Anyhow, more to be said! You see this country, it is a mess and getting worse daily. I could write a book highlighting the 23 interviews I had before fluking a Deputy Post; Or the three panels that were changed just to ensure that a troublemaker like me does not get an administrative position. Yes! Remember it was first the Governing Bodies that did the interviews. Then when Parkinson was up for grabs, between the first and second interviews it changed to a Special Panel made up of big boys from Ministry, Erdiston, UWI, two Board members and such. Then when Princess Margaret was up, again between the first and second interviews the panel then changed to the Commissioners without a single Board member being even informed. (Not that that made any difference to the song and dance that went on when I retired). Foundation, Ellerslie twice, St. George, Combermere and the list goes on.

Unfortunately, I was never a yes man, something which is required in many situations. I find it impossible to be present in the midst of nonsense going on called a “Status Quo” and the amount of people who don’t have the guts to come out and say anything. Well I always had guts. It’s going down now since I lost some weight. By the way, this is not political either since as you would have noticed, my demise was shared between both parties. So it would have to be me! I remember when a Deputy Chief education Officer called me in to her office to tell me that while I am tutoring at Erdiston College in Strategic Planning to Principals by the way, I must not say anything against the Ministry even if it is true. And you believe they have that in the Public Service Act too?

I have a lot more to say but I will pause and come again. I will not close however without challenging any member who sat on a panel to interview me over the last 10 years to really come out and expose the foolishness that goes on in this country, damaging and destroying the lives and psyches of many seriously-minded and hard-working individuals in this country. Using the word “Recommendation” to imply that it can be accepted or refused. All set up for ulterior motives to satisfy friends and cohorts like those now at the Ministry, names best left unsaid. I can’t forget the campaign manager of a minister that got a school one week before elections were called. Yeah. That was one that lick me up too!

My friend Mrs. Thompson, may she rest in peace, former Chairman of a Governing Body, was able to tell me something before her passing. Who else has the guts, the fortitude or the resolve? The seven years of secrecy have passed. Or do we remain a country of carpets and brooms, sweeping away the truths. By the way, more on the Minister to come! Yes sir, I am Mr. Ting as said to me at several meetings. This “devil” says: Please learn to pronounce your “th” as though it were not a “d”. Stop making up words on the people’s T.V. Were you a teacher or not? Which subject, I cannot imagine. A Union leader? Really!

Gone, but not for long!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

159 responses to “Wayne Willock – Time to Speak Out”


  1. The BU household thanks Wayne Willock for sharing his views with the public. His insider perspective is important to the debate.

  2. Anthony Davis Avatar

    The article is well written, and shows the folly which is going on in our schools! We need a Minister of Education – especially, as Wayne said, one who can speak the English language where necessary! I’ve always marvelled at the minister’s inability to pronounce anything with “th” in it properly. If the head is bad, the body can’t be good!


  3. @ Anthony Davis

    “The article is well written”

    No it is not. It is riddled with punctuation and grammatical errors ans perhaps gives a clue why he was denied a Principals position.


  4. and

  5. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ bookworm May 15, 2016 at 5:10 AM

    Mr. ‘nitpicking’ bookworm, are you sure you received the import of the article?
    It is not the technicality that is paramount but the message being conveyed. Yes, technical presentation is good; but what is better is the effectiveness of the communication on the reader or recipient.

    BTW, here is a miniscule dose of your own medicine:
    Shouldn’t that be ‘a Principal’s position’ (or better yet, ‘a position of Principal’)?

    Minister Jones might just be so impressed with your erudite command of grammar he should have no hesitation in appointing you the Czar of Grammar for schools with academically challenged “chilren”.


  6. @Miller
    I accept your chastisement. I neglected the apostrophe and should have known better.
    However,the article was poorly written,which made it difficult to read and so diluted any point it was trying to make.

    “It is not the technicality that is paramount but the message being conveyed.”

    Those words are at the root of the poor education standards of today and have resulted in the fractured English used by our political elite.


  7. Just to point out that this article was written by an “educator”

  8. Kammie Holder Avatar

    @Wayne Willock thanks for sharing your thoughts. I wish to share the above song .


  9. Rephrasing the first sentence as
    ‘The article is very informative, and shows the folly which is going on in our schools! We need a Minister of Education

    It is somewhat amusing when some refute the content of the article by pointing out “it is happening in America also’ or it contains ‘grammatical errors’ or ‘things are much better now compared to 50 years ago”. I saw that argument here.

    Hey, if ignoring reality makes your day better, I say “Go for it’


  10. *content of a posting

  11. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Their own idiotic secrecy acts, whether it be in the ministries, parliament or those secret acts created to protect international tax evaders…will now cut the collective dumb asses of the politicians..

    Come out things.

  12. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    The article is coherent and explicitly explains the nastiness playing out at the ministry of education, by officers and in the schools by administrators, teachers etc…all adults..that was the intent and it succeeded, I have seen all type of errors in books by the best publishers in the world…get a life.

    The message is clear.


  13. @theGazer
    I have no problem with the message,indeed I agree with much of it. But the poor writing does it no favours.
    In your own words,Hey, if ignoring reality makes your day better, I say “Go for it’ 🙂


  14. A read found at the following link and the deep-rooted issues exposed by Wayne Willock clearly show stakeholders are not on the same page.

    http://www.barbadosadvocate.com/news/education-minister-promises-end-impasse-‘-shortest-possible-time’


  15. @ww&c
    “The article is coherent”
    No it is not.

    Coherent, logical and well-organized : easy to understand.

    The very valid message is obscured by the disjointed,poorly written article.


  16. @David

    “PAGE NOT FOUND”


  17. @bookworm

    You have made your point, your opinion. For others the article has done the job. Will you be able to address the important issues raised? We will wait to see.


  18. @David
    It is not an opinion,it is a fact. How can you deny it?
    If you think that it was well written I grieve for the education of our children.

    The article would have done a far better job if care had been taken.

  19. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar
    Jeff Cumberbatch

    i see nothing wrong with Poonka’s style. It is written in the tone of an author who has a lot to say and is anxious to stay it all,

    The impression is given that he is so chockfull of information that mere words are not adequate to express it.


  20. @bookworm

    Reread BU’S comment, we are about the substantive issues raised in the article.


  21. @Dvid
    The issues raised are not new and can be identified in just about any organisation or business in Barbados.
    The old adage,It’s not what you know,it’s who you know, is the cornerstone of Barbados life.It is propped up by the “What is in it for me” attitude when you need something,especially from Government institutions.

    How can we change things? I do not know,but Dr Agard made a speech that impressed me. Maybe it heralds a new thinking?
    Sadly,Ido not have much faith.


  22. @David

    A read found at the following link and the deep-rooted issues exposed by Wayne Willock clearly show stakeholders are not on the same page.

    http://www.barbadosadvocate.com/news/education-minister-promises-end-impasse-‘-shortest-possible-time’

    Page still not found.

    Can you paste the article?


  23. EDUCATION MINISTER PROMISES END TO IMPASSE ‘IN SHORTEST POSSIBLE TIME’ Sun, 05/15/2016 – 12:03am Barbados1 BY: JANELLE HUSBANDS

    EDUCATION Minister Ronald Jones has given the assurance that the impasse between the Barbados Union of Teachers and his Ministry will be brought to a close within the shortest possible time.

    His comments came in the Lower Chamber on Thursday night during his response to the no-confidence motion laid against the government. Jones, a former President of the BUT, stressed that he believes in industrial relations. “I believe in the Trade Union movement of Barbados. I sat as a drafting member for the constitution of CTUSAB. I worked with that body all during the 1990s to 1995 before I went off to further studies.”

    He however encouraged those in the Union to “create an arena of reasonableness”. “Don’t let your personal issues taint the environment.”

    “I promise this House to do everything decent that I have to do to ensure that this current disturbance finds rest in the graveyard of industrial relations. That is my promise. We have mobilised internally of the Ministry to ensure that this comes to an end it makes no sense as a former leader in the Trade Union Movement to have myself ridiculed, unfortunately and unwarranted, very unwarranted, to have this continue,” he told the House.

    Minister Jones recalled that a number of schools over the years have had environmental issues including St. Leonard’s, Springer Memorial and Louis Lynch.

    “What we have had in the last three or four years is a coalescing of several things, some very simple, some caused by man’s errors, and some which we had to do deep searching to find.”

    However he noted that the issues are 90 per cent rectified. These include Grazette’s Primary as it related to mosquitoes, Ellerton with pigeons and rats and Springer Memorial which was affected by dust.

    He noted that the situation at Combermere was different because the source of the problem could not be found. The Minister noted that in one instance during Edutech, a hole was drilled though a vent pipe,the walls were sealed but not the pipe, sending fumes into the building. He noted that an oversight committee was created with all the stakeholders during this period and the committee still meets to ensure the well-being of those at the school is protected.“You cant predict that these things will happen. 90 percent have been addressed. Because once children or teachers are in our care we work in their better interest.”

    The Minister of Education told Honourable Members in the House that attention must be paid to septic tanks in schools, noting that after some time the gases can build up and affect the entire school environment. (JH)

  24. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Bookworm….there have been multiple links posted on the same subject, if you were up to date in reading them you eould not now need a thesaurus….for silly little nonissues, the real issues are in the body of the article.

  25. are-we-there-yet Avatar
    are-we-there-yet

    bookworm;

    Maria Agard made a speech that impressed me also. but her vote against the resolution clarified that that speech was purely smoke and mirrors signifying nothing. Her speech cried out for an abstention at the very least, not a vote of support for the Government.

    As for possible repercussions, her vote was not needed for the Government to win. They had a clear majority when the vote was taken

    Dr. Agard is not a credible change agent!

    and bookworm, you have a miniscule point re. poonka’s essay. Why belabour it?


  26. Steupsss…
    Barbados needs more people like Willock.
    The only way to deal with the kinda shiite from which we are suffering, is to expose the shiite-hounds who are secretly fouling up the damn place.

    @ Bookworm
    You coming with this lukewarm ‘dee word approach’ too…?
    If you admit that you DO NOT KNOW how to address these endemic issues which plague ‘ALL institutions in Barbados’, then why are you nitpicking Poonka’s brave approach to do so?
    Why not bring your high class grammatical skills to the table and expand the issues so that those who are unable to follow the author’s points can better understand what befalls us?

    All hail to Wayne.

    He is clearly being very honest and accurate in his assessment of how things ‘work’ (or more correctly “don’t work”) in Barbados.
    Hopefully, others will see the need to become whistleblowers – exposing the lotta crap being buried to the downfall of a potentially beautiful place…

  27. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    Bookworm, your position is rather disingenuous. And based on your penchant for clarityI checked Webster. He says that means: not truly honest or sincere; giving the false appearance of being honest or sincere.

    As the Dean and others said the piece is chock-a-block with understandable, logical and clear prose.

    Stylistically of course it could be improved… what writing can’t. You wrote what amounted to one line (30 odd words) basically and that was lacking ‘coherence’ as pointed out.

    At an Independence Day parade style and precise appearance is paramount, The competence tested is looking good and marching perfectly on order.

    When action stationes are called soldiers are awarded for hitting the bulls-eye and winning the fight with superior skill. Their sartorial style and how beautifully they march becomes an irrelevance as it does not help win the battle.

    You are obviously not about winning that battle.

    Ahhh…that’s much too stilted and incoherent. How about: You obviously are part of the problem. smile!

  28. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    ‘Stations’ is normally spelled without and an ‘es’ and a period generally ends sentences rather than a comma.

    So either I cocked-up above or I was testing Bookworm’s exquisite standard on how grammatical flaws affect coherence! Oh dear.


  29. @ Dribbler…
    On the BU battlefield, no one gives a shiite….


  30. @dribbler

    Minor spelling and punctuation mistakes can be forgiven. 🙂

    Sloppy use of English however……………


  31. Interesting read.

    Reflects more on the system and culture rather than solely the present dispensation.

    One must empathise with Bro. Poonka’s trials and tribulations.

    Who will have the guts and fortitude to do what is right rather than what is expedient?

    Just observing


  32. WAYNE WILLOCK wrote” The Ministry needs to seriously put in place that special institution which has been spoken about for many years. It should be run by the Defence Force personnel”

    It should also have a psychologist on staff.

    A student who physically attacks a teacher is seriously “disturbed”.


  33. I agree that the article was disjointed and contained some grammatical errors. I also agree that, as an educator, he should have done better but I can assure you that there are principals in this country who would have done worse. Sooo…. could we discuss the content now?


  34. WAYNE WILLOCK wrote” The Ministry needs to seriously put in place that special institution which has been spoken about for many years. It should be run by the Defence Force personnel”

    Really?
    A certain A.Hitler had some of these places. Guarded and run by para-militarists. Called them concentration camps.

  35. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    I think Willock has clearly declared what is the norm in Barbados with respect to the gifted or those who try to perform according to how they were trained at home, school, Sunday school, when folk of his age group and above were growing up.

    I think that we should stop the nit picking about any imperfections in his prose, and dwell instead on the content of his thesis.


  36. Let me make it quite clear. I have no love for the deeply flawed culture that exists within Bajan commerce and Government. I certainly have no respect for the Minister of “Edicashin” Jones.
    I side with the OP and agree with the sentiments that he tries to express.
    However, if you are going to attack these cultures , do you not think that you should make sure that the syntax is correct. Especially when you highlight and mock the Ministers diction and mauling of the English language?

  37. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar
    Jeff Cumberbatch

    @ Bookworm, May you supply some evidence of this incorrect “syntax of which you speak?


  38. @JC

    Syntax,the arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language.

    On the other hand, when we analyse why certain children display very unsociable behaviours, as is being suggested as a remedy, what happens afterwards?

    Years ago when I was P.R.O. and then President of the B.S.T.U. this issue of violence against teachers raised its head and from then till now, some 18 years later.

    I would never forget the day there was a fire above the school and children were having asthmatic attacks and the writer was chastised for being asked by teachers what to do. He didn’t even have a clue what was going on. He asked if the teachers think I am “our saviour” because lives had to be saved without his initiative.

    My friend Mrs. Thompson, may she rest in peace, former Chairman of a Governing Body, was able to tell me something before her passing. Who else has the guts, the fortitude or the resolve? The seven years of secrecy have passed. Or do we remain a country of carpets and brooms, sweeping away the truths. By the way, more on the Minister to come! Yes sir, I am Mr. Ting as said to me at several meetings. This “devil” says: Please learn to pronounce your “th” as though it were not a “d”. Stop making up words on the people’s T.V. Were you a teacher or not? Which subject, I cannot imagine. A Union leader? Really!


  39. @are we there yet

    Maria Agard made a speech that impressed me also. but her vote against the resolution clarified that that speech was purely smoke and mirrors signifying nothing. Her speech cried out for an abstention at the very least, not a vote of support for the Government.

    As for possible repercussions, her vote was not needed for the Government to win. They had a clear majority when the vote was taken

    Dr. Agard is not a credible change agent!

    and bookworm, you have a miniscule point re. poonka’s essay. Why belabour it?

    Except for your last point I agree with you completely. That is why I have very little faith that ANYTHING will be done.

    I do not know the poster but it seems that many on here do, as poonka. Maybe that is why they are ready to overlook the flaws?


  40. Something is wrong when people have to wait until they retire to say how they feel, even when they are calysonians or former.

    Something is wrong when any establishment can use law or regulation or other social protections to stop humans from telling them their minds.

    That any system could see out young people, until old age, never letting them say that the system/s is/are an ass/es, something is wrong.

    Something is wrong when a single political party interaction can deem one, forever, as having a lifetime commitment to that tribe. And no other determination matters. Something is wrong.

    Something is wrong, when systems can so protect themselves and are therefore impervious to any form of internal transformation, regardless of circumstances. Something is wrong!


  41. Something is wrong, when systems can so protect themselves and are therefore impervious to any form of internal transformation, regardless of circumstances. Something is wrong!

    Amen!!


  42. Public Officials have to honour the *Official Secrets Act.*

    On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >

  43. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    I like the phrase “that having been done ”
    This phrase could be rendered 3 ways in Latin
    1- by an ablative absolute
    2 by ubi with the indicative, or
    3 quae cum with the subjunctive SWEET SWEET SWEET!


  44. @bookwarm

    You have NOT adequately responded to Jeff’s question. Let us use a red pen on Poonka’s submission if you insist on being obstinate about your point. Don’t be confused with style. Pick two or three extracts from the submission let use it as a teaching/learning moment.


  45. Very useful content that should encourage policymakers, analysts, and right thinking Barbadians to start paying more attention to structures and systems that are riddled with problems and excuses as to why better cannot be done. Willock has put much on the table, and instead of drawing swords on style and construction, the emphasis has to be on the veracity of the accounts and how best to fix the serious problems. In fact, I would advocate a revisit to the workings of all our key institutions. Interesting and provocative article.

  46. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    The negative response to Willock’s article probably reveals why many more people decline to post on BU. Instead of debating the merits or demerits of his effort, you have aset of the illiterati trying to degrade the article.
    You have to have more than GUTS to stand up for anything in Barbados
    I imagine that Willock probably survived because he could not be fired by some maggot in the MOE refusing to renew his contract.


  47. @GP

    Agree with you, however, bear in mind it is often a deliberate ploy by some. We know Poonka is constructed of the right timbre to withstand such frivolous offerings.


  48. Please note Wayne Willocks article has gone viral on Facebook.


  49. @David

    If you insist that the original article was rendered in correct, clear English then you have a problem.
    However if you are happy to live with this problem,so be it.

    By the way,

    David May 15, 2016 at 7:23 AM #
    @bookworm

    Reread BU’S comment, we are about the substantive issues raised in the article

    I seem to be one of the very few who has tried to comment on the issues. Most,you included, have been quick to defend the indefensible but have not addressed the issues he raised. I suspect that you,as well as I, do not have a clue how we solve them.
    The man had some very valid and serious points but he put them across very badly. You all know that so why continue to defend it?
    I leave you with this thought. If we do not get the basics right,how then can we solve the bigger issues?
    bookworm has left the room.

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading