← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Erskine Griffith
Erskine Griffith
In response to a BU commenter (Artaxerxes), former popular Talk Show host Walter Blackman delivered a stinging response – required reading for all Barbadians

“Some students may be fortunate enough to gain scholarships and pursue […]qualifications in areas that will benefit the development of Barbados.

But after graduating they are confronted with the reality that they are no employment opportunities available to them here.”

Artaxerxes,
You have commingled two concepts here, so let us separate the two strands.

Strand 1: Many students gain scholarships and pursue qualifications in many areas that would undoubtedly benefit the development of Barbados. That is a fact.

I hate to lean on personal experience here, but it is the quickest method I can use to get over the point.

I was awarded a fellowship by the OAS to study a masters in actuarial science because the OAS, the World Bank, and the IMF believed that a Barbadian should be trained at that level to provide expertise to the NIS of Barbados as the system matured.
I was working in the budget department of the Ministry of Finance, and Mr. Michael Parris was my boss at the time. Although, I had only studied maths up to ‘O’ level at Combermere, I attacked my post-graduate studies with a sense of confidence and determination. So much so, that I was the only student at the University of Nebraska to receive an A in Social Security the year I studied it.

We had no actuaries and no exam centre in Barbados at the time, so thinking ahead, I approached the Society of Actuaries and enquired if I could take the actuarial professional exams on my return to Barbados. If I managed to pass a professional exam before leaving the USA, the Society promised to establish a test centre in Barbados. I passed my exam, and by doing so, succeeded in getting Bridgetown established as a test centre so that other Barbadians coming after me would enjoy the privilege of taking their actuarial professional exams at home.

Strand 2: After graduation, these students are confronted with the reality that there are no employment opportunities available TO THEM here.

The Tom Adams administration was midway in its second term of office when I returned to Barbados, and the first thing I noticed was the extent to which the working environment in the Ministry of Finance had changed. Mr. Parris had moved on to become company secretary of the Arawak Cement Plant. Mr. Erskine Griffith was now saddled with the opportunity of charting my professional career. I was not a member of any political party.
To make a long story short, Mr. Griffith placed me in an acting position (reviewing letters written by Barbadians seeking a waiver of duties and taxes) which rewarded me with an acting allowance of $30 per month. All of my attempts to secure employment in government in areas related to my chosen profession (NIS, Insurance Corporation of Barbados, Supervisor of Insurance Office) were systematically blocked and thwarted. Eventually, Mr. Griffith had me transferred to the Ministry of Agriculture.

Clearly, Mr. Griffith, as Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Finance, had his own handpicked list of “experts” to assist the Government of Barbados with its handling of financial matters. Personally, over the course of about 30 years, Mr. Griffith rose to giddying heights (Director of Finance and Planning, Head of the Civil Service, a diplomatic posting in Brussels, BLP senator, and Minister of Agriculture in the Owen Arthur administration). Is it possible that that ministerial posting contributed to Owen Arthur’s downfall?

Now take a few seconds and contrast the rise of Mr. Griffith with the fortunes of the government’s financial sector. Start by mentally recalling the annual Auditor-General’s reports that point to a pervasive, repetitive and sickening breach of government’s financial regulations, dwell for a moment on the scandalous and corrosive CLICO robbery and the complicit behavior of the various actors involved, then think seriously about the millions of taxpayers’ dollars that ought to have ended up in the Treasury, but didn’t. Think also about the millions of dollars that should have never left the Treasury, but did. Ponder on the low probability of you getting an NIS pension, because in actual fact, the politicians and senior civil servants have ensured that no actuary has been aligned to the NIS long enough to raise the hue and cry over the rape and wastage of mandatory contributions paid by Barbadian workers.

Barbados has not reached this blighted predicament by accident. We are here because thousands had to suffer so that a few individuals, who really “ain’t worth what Paddy shot it”, could establish a system to suit their selfish and short-sighted purposes. Some employment opportunities exist in Barbados, but they are deliberately blocked off until the “right” person can be handpicked.

Artaxerxes, I was only 28 years old when I came up against this iniquitous system in Barbados for the first time. Although quite young, I rationalized that it was not me alone that was being victimized. There had to be thousands more suffering the same fate. This rationalization enabled me to keep my sanity, if nothing else. Sometimes, I detect a slight hint of disgust blended with frustration in your writing, and that deep aching pain of long ago comes rushing back to haunt and mock me. Maybe, its about time that all of us Barbadians who have been “unfaired” by this system start thinking about doing something about it.

A country being run in this way can never prosper. My instincts tell me that a backlash is certainly coming.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

161 responses to “Walter Blackman Tells It Like It Is”

  1. Caswell Franklyn Avatar

    Walter

    Your experience is being repeated all over the Public Service to this day. These idiots don’t realise or don’t care that they are running the best talent away from Barbados. They then install their pet clowns as permanent secretaries, heads of department and in every other critical post. The result is that the Public Service is unable to fulfil its mandate and the country suffers in every sphere of activity.

    They even go as far as to change the qualifications required for the job just so that their hand picked incompetents get the job.


  2. @Caswell

    Can you give an example to support your comment?


  3. @Walter,

    I can understand the depth of your feeling .

    It alright for Artra, Bushie and their ilk to talk, but almost every person who leaves the country; often not by choice, but because of the archaic thinking of the powers that be. Go through this experience. I can duplicate your scenario. I left Barbados for the second time (THE FIRST TIME WAS TO DO My BACHELOR’S DEGREE.) I was working in the Civil Service at the time. I could not get study leave. I RESIGNED and went to the U.S.. I CAME BACK IN 1963 AND MANAGED TO GET A JOB AS Senior technologist at Barbados General hospital; later the QEH. In 1968, I was accepted to do my Masters degree in Microbiology (specializing in Immunology)at U.W.I Mona. I applied for study leave, and, even though it was in the field in which I was working, and even though, according to the regulations I should have received leave with full pay, half pay, and no pay, I was only given leave without pay.
    Upon successfully finishing my Master’s ( I had married, in Canada, and had gotten a job at Mt. Sinai hospital, where they requested that I SET UP THEIR IMMUNOLOGY AND SEROLOGY DEPARTMENT. I returned to Barbados in accordance with the requirements of my Study leave; without pay, and enquired as to what position I WOULD HOLD AND WHAT DUTIES I WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM. THE ANSWER WAS”I really don’t know what we would want you to do”. My answer was: “Since you knew what I was going to study, and I had kept in contact, you had over two years to think what duties you would want me tp perform”. Mind you, they had no immunology or Serology department. I promptly resigned and went back to Mt. Sinai.
    I told them frankly that if I was going to go back to the same job, then I might as well not have left to study further.
    I worked at Mt. Sinai for over twelve years, establishing one of the city’s leading IMMUNOLOGY AND SEROLOGY DEPARTMENTs, PIONEERING STUDIES AND TESTS in Hepatitis B, Auto Immune Diseases; Lupus. Sjogren’s Syndrome etc, introducing new procedures for testing, having publications,etc.

    All sorts of people will make comments, but what individuals have to go through, all the while longing for home, and wanting to contribute to the betterment of the country, are scorned by those who remain, and see life through the narrow lenses before them.

    Frustration results in their departure, with the consequent loss to the country of valuable people


  4. @Walter,and David and Caswell,

    The answer to my query about the type of job I would be required to perform was from the Chief Pathologist himself. not a PS, or Minister.

  5. Caswell Franklyn Avatar

    David

    They changed the qualifications for the post of Chief Marshal, by simply replacing the word “and” with “or” so that Adrian Lovell could get the post. We also had a ridiculous situation in the Telecommunications Unit where Ronald Kennedy had the qualifications to be chief because they lowered the bar for a friend, but he did not have the qualifications to be appointed to the number 4 position in the unit. Put another way, he required higher qualifications for the number 4 job than he needed for the number one spot.

    You should remember the shameful situation surrounding the appointment of the Chief Justice, even though he might not be considered one of the incompetents.

    They changed the qualifications for the posts of Comptroller of Customs, deputy comptroller, assistant comptroller and customs officer I by inserting the LLB as a requirement to exclude many competent officers.

    I could go on but you get the idea.

    Sent from my iPad

    >

  6. Caswell Franklyn Avatar

    David

    Even though I promised not to engage Alvin again, I must wonder how a person with his ability could allow himself to become a mindless yardfowl for any political party. You think that he is going senile?


  7. @Caswell

    You snatched the thought first.


  8. Blackie .. yah lie. You did a Young Democrat along with Thompson and Mascoll, all from Combermere … Once you’re connected to a Party you can never shake it unless you public ally cross over like Ralph Thorn and Kerry Simmons… and secondly, Stephen Alleyne was over and away studying the exact same thing as you, but Stephen get a pick in the private sector … … Ha ha .. Don’ kill mah


  9. I am inbetween minds on this one. If government starts to compete with the private sector and actively pursue well qualified Barbadians, those 5 CXCs will not cut it anymore. And then you would be reading a different view. I

  10. Violet C Beckles Avatar

    keep at them Caswell, all is coming to light


  11. Just on comment.
    Must have had some connections for he departed from the MoE with an OAS scholarship and not the completed application form.


  12. well wunna ain/t talking nothing that is not true happening across the board,the same thing happened to my father when he applied for a job in hotel management a job he applied for at the hilton in its early years but was denied and given to a less qualified person because of his color and status, , However my dad went to England and became a very notable person in the Hotel industry and received several awards, Be that as it may the fall out coming from such an experience can not be forgotten as he had to leave behind a family for many years in pursuit of his dream in order to compensate and to make a living in a country one purposed not to his preference

  13. Caswell Franklyn Avatar

    Somehow I always knew that you were raised without a father and that is why you always attack me. Do I remind you of him? Well I’m not so behave!

    Sent from my iPad

    >


  14. Lol Caswell but believe me his presence was felt in that home as real as if he was he was there in person. Never missed a beat as to what was happening in the home. A great family man and a great provider. Would have been very hard for anyone else to walk in his shoes
    His attempt to access the job of his dream did not stop him from becoming a success in his endeavor but propelled him to excel beynd his expectations to become a home maker an excellent father and provider and a family to be proud of with scholastic achievements

    I’m a all but significant way he got the last laugh.


  15. These fcukers did go over en away to import talent to design the Errol Barrow Statue … they did go over en away to import the talent to design the VAT software … they went over en away to get the IT support for the NIS.

    Any of these projects could have been used as international class experience, paid for by tax payers to further the interests of nationals. Oh shite before I faget, the new Kensington Oval was designed by an Englishman who not only got a lot of international mileage, but won an award for his efforts.

    Yah know maybe I should be more sympathetic towards academics for not having jobs reserved for them, but those who make the decisions that affect the viability of local designers are indeed academics and so it is difficult to shed a tear.


  16. The NIS deductions is just another PAYE deduction


  17. BAFBFP September 4, 2015 at 7:26 PM #
    “Blackie .. yah lie. You did a Young Democrat along with Thompson and Mascoll, all from Combermere … Once you’re connected to a Party you can never shake it unless you public ally cross over like Ralph Thorn and Kerry Simmons… and secondly, Stephen Alleyne was over and away studying the exact same thing as you, but Stephen get a pick in the private sector … … Ha ha .. Don’ kill mah”

    BAFBFP,
    There is absolutely nothing for me to gain by lying.

    Firstly, I joined the Young Democrats after I resigned from the civil service. I spent 4 years in the organization, and was President for the middle two years. During that time Thompson and Mascoll were not members.

    Secondly, having decided to leave the civil service, I cast my eyes on 3 insurance companies in Barbados: The Barbados Mutual, Life of Barbados, and CLICO.
    The Barbados Mutual claimed that they had no vacancy so some friends of mine told me to go to Life Of Barbados (LOB) and personally ask for McDonald Smith. They said that “McD” had a progressive mind and he would be a good mentor. I went to LOB about 6 times and never got to see or meet Mr. Smith. The last time I went, the receptionist pulled me aside and told me in confidence that the company already had the job of actuary put down for a fellow who went to Harrison College named Stephen Alleyne. She said he was studying in England and was expected to return to Barbados within a year.
    That left me with CLICO, and the only job I got there was that of an insurance salesman.

    Months before I left Barbados to take up permanent residence in the USA, a spiteful Erskine Sandiford called general elections in September 1994. I thought the elections provided an excellent opportunity for me to gain some experience and insight into running for office so I “publicly crossed over” to the NDP and ran against Mr. Sandiford. That experience only cost me about $250 (my deposit) but I left Barbados with a much deeper knowledge and understanding of the intricacies of campaigning and the political “nature” of Barbadians. That was $250 well spent.

    I am fully aware though, that despite my “crossing” (as you would have suggested), I have been unable to shake the party connection. Practically everyone I know still perceives me as a D.


  18. Correck … Ca dear Blackie … you were the head of the Young Dems … and that is pretty high profile. You were the star boy of the DLP, until Mascoll and Thompson came along. You can’ shake that kind of history sa easy …


  19. @Caswell,

    I came back to Barbados from the U.S. in 1963. I became involved in the society, singing in choirs, entering into arguments and discussions in the “Bus Stand Cabinet,and entering fully in political discussions. I was a member of the Under Forties; along with Lindsay Bolden, Henry
    Forde, Lester Whitehead, Bree St. John, and others. I attended political meetings during the Independence discussions and campaigning. I admired Errol Barrow’s position on Independence, and his policies. Even though I was a Civil Servant I attached Errol Barrow posters to my car when He was campaigning for the seat in St. John; especially when he enunciated his position on independence. I have supported the Democratic Labour PARTY SINCE THAT TIME.
    I WOULD HAVE BEEN MINDLESS, and dishonest, IF I HAD REMAINED A MEMBER OF THE UNDER FORTIES.
    I go according to my conscience, and unlike some paling cocks, or yard ducks, I don’t go over the neighbours paling because they put out a few scratch grains. Even if I AM GOING SENILE I WILL NOT FOLLOW THE MULTITUDE JUST FOR THE SAKE of following. If my friend develops warts or an infection I will not scorn or abandon him. We are all human, have our faults, have our moments of weakness, and act in manners that other persons may not understand or even agree with, but I will not abandon them when they need help. That is the time to come to the aid of your friend or party. I have been a member of the Liberal Party, here in Canada, since 1967, through thick and thin. I am helping their candidate in the election due in October. I don’t change my loyalty just for the sake of changing. If you choose to call me a yard fowl- in a derogatory way- it does not bother me. It would bother me if I were not true to my conscience, whether people agreed with me or not, or whether it made sense to them or not. I am my own man and I take directions from no one.


  20. @Caswell;

    “…”the shameful situation surrounding the appointment of the Chief Justice, even though he might not be considered one of the incompetents.”
    Are you suggesting the other folk; like the
    comptroller of Custome etc, were incompetents?
    Be specific.


  21. “so I “publicly crossed over” to the NDP and ran against Mr. Sandiford.”

    I wasn’t aware of that at all. I haven’t voted since 1976 but I would have voted for you.


  22. @ Walter Blackman

    “Whatever happened to critical intellectuals?

    Neoliberalism combined with the disappearance of critical intellectuals spell a bleak future for Western democracy.”

    http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2015/08/happened-critical-intellectuals-refugees-150831065656343.html


  23. “if my friend develops warts or an infection I will not scorn or abandon him. We are all human, have our faults, have our moments of weakness, and act in manners that other persons may not understand or even agree with, but I will not abandon them when they need help. That is the time to come to the aid of your friend or party”

    though convoluted in content I understand the point you are trying to convey; but you have to tell your friends when they are wrong too; you cannot support them in nonsensical decisions which contribute to their downfall and the downfall of others. It is inconceivable that a man of your letters can continually support the nonsense in the form of governance perpetrated on the people of I hope your beloved country of Barbados for the past eight years by a Government who seems to make decisions based on whim and fancy. Your position does open the door for people to question the common sense of a man of your obvious intellect. Man shed your political skins and channel your skills in in trying to institute a new form of governance in Barbados for the people and by the people. The DLP you support then is not the DLP now. So you can’t be accused of treachery.


  24. @Alvin

    There is one stark difference between you and Walter. Issues seem to guide his dicision making, not blind party loyalty.


  25. @Walter

    Some feedback: of the popular talk show hosts we have had in Barbados, you and Elombe are way out front. BU, and others, appreciate both of you have continued to comment on social issues via other media. We look forward to the day we can have more contributions via whatever media you decide. Unfortunately talk radio is so threatened by legal stricture that it is hard to fathom you operating ‘comfortably’ in that forum again.


  26. @balance,

    The DLP I supported then is still the DLP of today. The philosophy of the Party has not changed. I attend Annual Conferences and hear the “man in the street”make his voice heard, put forward resolutions that are debated and passed or defeated. Democracy is at work. Governance and the daily functioning of the Civil Service is the engine that keeps us ahead of so many other people and places. Despite the humps, “pot holes” and obstructions that have to be surmounted, our country functions well; not as well as many want, expect and demand, but in the main it works well. How else could we have the type of Blog that Barbados Underground is, or Word Press, or the call-in programmes. For a tiny island with less than three quarters of a million people, we produce world champions in every field.

    Be proud of our achievements, as we strive to do better. Step back, analyze and consider.

    You talk about a “new form of governance in Barbados, for the people, and by the people.”
    What do you mean by “a new form of governance?” Are you suggesting a change in the constitution? EXACTLY what are you suggesting? EXACTLY how would you change the CONSTITUTION? Are you suggesting change without going through the correct procedures?
    Don’t just say, “we want a change” without spelling out what type of change and how it should or would be done.

    Barbados will always be my beloved country. Times have changed worldwide. Look at what is taking place in the Middle East and Europe. Look at what we have and compare. Are we not better off?
    Enough for now.


  27. @David,
    Any person who have attended Party Conferences will tell you that I have spoken critically of the party periodically, within the party. Persons who have attended the discussions on Fridays, will tell you that I have been critical of the party, periodically. I however will not join a chorus for the sake of joining a chorus.
    Where I am concerned there is not “blind party:\” loyalty in doing or saying what I think is right.


  28. Blackie was a good host, fair and balanced.

    Mottley was a bully, and often wrong, wrong, wrong … but yah dear not tell he so …!


  29. “Alvin Cummins September 5, 2015 at 8:53 AM #

    @balance,

    The DLP I supported then is still the DLP of today. The philosophy of the Party has not changed. ”

    Well after that post considering the hardship that has been placed on the small man in the last eight years and you still hold that view then I can only surmise coming from a man of your scholarship is that all is definitely lost. No further questions , Your Worship.


  30. @ Cummings may be I am naive, just ingrunt or a sad combination of both but any working civil servant who pastes the political image of a candidate, regardless of his bona fides, on his car to advocate that politician’s views strikes me as being quite opinionated and perhaps unable to properly effect his duties in a non-partisan way for the overall improvement of the country.

    Of course it was your free will to so act in those heady times but decorum and balance must not only be done but must also perceived to be done.

    So to read your overall submissions and particularly the comment, “Governance and the DAILY FUNCTIONING (my emphasis) of the Civil Service is the engine that keeps us ahead of so many other people and places” causes me great mirth; particularly against the backdrop of Blackman’s piece at top and the evidence of the ‘sterling’ work of the Civil Service per CLICO.


  31. Mr Cummings this is where I would start-
    i have already posited on this forum that political parties have outlived their usefulness and to regain trust in our system of governance,the perception of accountibility, and transparency must be improved. To do this we have to take back Parliament from the politicians by having officials elected to parliament from the bowels of the constituencies to look after the interest of the constituents and not the party. Parliamentarians can be assigned certain responsibilties as members of various oversight commiitees or ministries selected from among the members of parliament. These oversight bodies suitably staffed by persons of varying disciplines would decide policy and forward to the technocrats in the relevant administrative departments for execution. In this way, it is hoped that the chances of parliamentarians getting involved in corruption would be limited if not fully eliminated and the characters of parliamentarians would not be open to abuse based on rumor and speculation.. The various independent public service selection bodies would be restored to select persons for employment and to head the various government agencies.Appointments to such critical and important posts like the Chief Justice will be free of bias and gossip.There will be no need for a primus interpares. The role of meeting dignataries and shaking hands can be assigned to the speaker of the parliament or rotated on an annual basis among the parliamentarians. In this system, the role of the governor general and term limits for parliamentarians would eventually come under scrutiny.


  32. “we have to take back Parliament from the politicians” … Bro, “we” never had much to do with Parliament in the first place.

    To your wider point tho, Constituencies are geographical, and societies are far more complex than mere geography can address.

    It is about time that relevant NGOs representing key interests, Enviroment, Health, Education, Security, Rural, Urban, Manufacturing etc chose their representatives to fill the seats of Cabinet.

    Fck the Parties.


  33. @Alvin

    What is the philosophy of the DLP TODAY? And how is it different from the BLP?

    Submitted on 2015/09/05 at 8:53 AM

    @balance,

    The DLP I supported then is still the DLP of today. The philosophy of the Party has not changed.


  34. Of course political parties are not serving the best interest of the electorate as they have been subverted by self serving personalities.

    But how is that rectified “LONG TERM” by the models suggested above (or Bushie’s plan) where NGO or “various independent public service selection bodies” would run the show?

    The issue is not the political partiy model itself. It is the people who infuse it.

    Until and unless we can change the psychology of greed and ‘me first’ that permeates many who now step forward as the people’s representatives we are simply replacing one defective system for another.

    Are not elections supposed to be the most effective term limit process?

    Isn’t the candidate representation process supposed to be transparent and localized to a constituency?

    Are these not ultimately governed and propelled by every day Bajans?

    How are NGO, managed by interest groups better? How independent will be the ‘selection bodies’ be?

    I can’t foresee these options as viable solutions for truly effective change. It’s a George Orwell Farming redux!

    To take back the political process we simply need to act with vigor and use the tools we already have. The most effective selection bodies are activists generating the ground swell to vote out corrupt politicians on both sides.

    Tough job.

    What is otherwise being suggested is both tough and can’t even get out of the starting blocks. Why even go down that Alice in Wonderland rabbit hole!


  35. mean wunna can’t see that Alvin is an idiot….?


  36. @Alvin

    “I was accepted to do my Masters degree in Microbiology (specializing in Immunology)at U.W.I Mona.”

    Great Alvin, I would not dear challenge you in your specialist field of Microbiology, as I am Ignorant (lacking knowledge and understanding) in that specified arena.

    But, so many like you, get into seeking to expound on the Historic Judeo/Christian Worldview, when you are ‘Ignorant’ (lacking knowledge and understanding) on the multiple aspects of intense study that is required to grasp the facts and evidence, of the Old and New Testament, in relation to the intense study of Comparative Religions, all of which I’ve studied for over twenty five years, earning five degrees, in Bible and Theology, including my Doctor of Ministry in Theology.

    I remain silent and seek to listen and learn from other secular fields of study, rather than ignorantly interject on matters of which I am grossly ignorant!

    Enough said!!


  37. Bush shit u need to stop your low life insults Jack ass u


  38. Exclaimer September 5, 2015 at 5:09 AM #
    @ Walter Blackman

    “Whatever happened to critical intellectuals?

    Exclaimer,
    I enjoyed reading that article you referred me to.

    Bu is a microcosm of the wider Barbadian society, and putting the banter and the efforts of trolls aside, you, along with many others on BU perform the role of critical intellectuals quite well. I was carried from a situation of ignorance to one of awareness and understanding through the contributions made on BU by the “commenters” on the Cahill project. These “commenters” took their time to raise the alarm, not out of a desire to acquire fame and fortune, but out of concern for our safety and the well-being of generations of Barbadians yet unborn.

    In the wider society, the editorials of our newspapers, and the offerings of columnists have shown a marked tendency recently to focus on issues related to governance, justice, crime, and national economic development, or lack of it. Their positions do not support maintaining the status quo.

    In relation to my recent article which dealt with making adjustments to our educational system, I found these words from C J Polychroniou (the author of the article you referred me to) to be quite interesting:

    “For starters, universities have abandoned their traditional role of preparing students to be caring, active citizens, and, instead, aim almost exclusively towards preparing them for the global marketplace. Accordingly, most universities produce professionals these days rather than graduates as critically engaged citizens who will play a leading role in their communities and in the struggle for a better world.”


  39. balance September 5, 2015 at 5:01 AM #
    “I wasn’t aware of that at all. I haven’t voted since 1976 but I would have voted for you.”

    balance,
    Thanks for the vote of confidence. Maybe one day soon, you will get another chance. Who knows?
    LOL


  40. So, what Alvin is saying is that he will criticize the DLP in the company of DLP members, but dare any of us criticize the DLP he will defend them to the ends of stupidity.


  41. And that is why though I voted for the DLP all my life I never would join a party or seek to enter politics. I like calling a spade a spade in any company. Truth does not change depending on who is present.


  42. The written philosophy of the DLP has not changed but the policies of this administration are diametrically opposed to its written philosophy.


  43. Walter,

    Hurry up and make up your mind.! You seem genuinely concerned for Barbados. It will soon be too late.


  44. It is not often that I have wanted to side with Baffy, BUT his opinion on Political Parties is quite correct. They quickly deteriorate into cesspools of favouritism, corruption etc.

    Mao said, “man in society/ groups is like a Pearl in a bowl of dirty water, take the individual out and buff it up and he/it will shine beautifully but place it back into that bowl of dirty water and it looses its brilliance.”


  45. @Alvin

    It is disturbing that a man of your intelligence/ experience has such faith in Political Parties.

    Yes, in your youth with Dippa Skippa the DLP was a force for advancing the Nation and implementing excellent philosophy. However, what we have today is not even a shadow of its former DLP self, in its desire or capability to implement the Philosophy. Therefore, how can you or anyone else be comfortable staying firmly on the bandwagon? For me there would only be 2 options, get involved very actively in righting the ship or jump ship (not necessarily to another party)

    Secondly, in Canada you are supporting a young kid to lead the Nation who has little to offer besides his name. The mere fact he was selected leader is an act of DESPERATION for a collapsed party! Please dont tell me you would have supported Dippa’s son too. I went to school with him and he never distinguished himself, just like Justin.


  46. Money .. you always pon my side .. yah just hate to admit it in public … ha ha

    Look word what the fck do you think is a Political Party ..? It is a G A N G … I spell it slow ’cause I know you can’ read too fast… having a formal internal structure with a common ethos, but no legal foot print. It is a quasi-NGO.

    Now why should Cabinet be the preserve of only T W O quasi-NGOs, with both having matching objectives and MO’s …?

    NOG heads are answerable to the NGO bodies… Parliamentarians are NOT even answerable to the constituents …

    Jesus Christ think nah


  47. So many cases posted to BU and elsewhere how our system has failed to absorbed talented Bajans. Why bother to issue scholarships? Why bother to allocate significant resources to education. GP has blanked you all, his is another well documented case.


  48. Zoe
    With your qualifications I am of the view that you are more a student of history than anything else.


  49. David September 5, 2015 at 8:52 AM #
    @Walter

    “We look forward to the day we can have more contributions via whatever media you decide. Unfortunately talk radio is so threatened by legal stricture that it is hard to fathom you operating ‘comfortably’ in that forum again.”

    David,
    Trust me, my discomfort from operating in the talk radio forum does not emanate from threatening legal strictures. Let me explain.

    Whilst I was a moderator on the call-in programmes, Mr. David Ellis would often call me on short notice and ask me to fill in for another moderator. On every occasion, I dutifully obliged.

    One night, on a tell-it-like-it-is program in 1992, I had David Thompson (I think he was Minister of Finance at the time) and Dr. Johnny Cheltenham on the phone engaging in a discussion about the Mobil refinery. As the moderator, I found David Thompson’s lack of knowledge on the subject matter to be so embarrassingly unacceptable that I publicly upbraided him for it.
    As soon as the programme was over, Mr. Ellis appeared before me, and in a fit of rage, ordered me to tell him why I treated David Thompson like that. Unruffled, I quietly and politely told him that if he loved and cared about David Thompson so much, then please tell him not to call any programmes I was moderating unless he had something of value to offer.

    I was always a curious child. Since the behind-the-scenes hanky pankying among politicians (specifically, the Executive branch of Government) and Judges (the Judiciary) had always intrigued me, I decided to put on my “sociologist cap” in order to find a way to document the incestuous relationship that existed between the two branches of government. I concluded that the best way to get the judges under the microscope was to set a legal trap for the Prime Minister, who just happened to be Erskine Sandiford at the time.

    I achieved my objective by running for the position of President of the DLP, and then skillfully goading a panic-stricken PM Sandiford into breaking the laws of the party. The DLP election results showed that I received about 74% of the eligible votes, whilst Mr. Sandiford received almost 750%. Since Mr. Sandiford was not my main target, i decided not to publicly reveal the infeasible 750% of the votes he had received, fearing that such a revelation would belittle him in the eyes of his more intelligent regional prime ministerial peers.

    Having completed phase 1 of my plan, I publicly threatened court action (which I had always planned to take, and which I created history in Barbados by actually taking) and paused for dramatic effect. During my next programme (Getting Down To Brass Tacks) a caller raised the election topic and Mr. Ellis flew into another fit of rage. I quickly and quietly wrote a letter to VOB informing them that I would now withdraw as a moderator. A copy of my letter was published in the press.

    I did moderate a few programmes after that, but after the 1994 elections, I sat by my radio and heard Mr. Ellis informed a caller, who had asked when I will be returning to the programme, that “Mr. Blackman has crossed the Rubicon. He will not be coming back.” To all intents and purposes, I was fired.

    Mind you, VOB had given me an award of excellence for my work, but it was not excellent work they were interested in. Mr. David Ellis had a political agenda, and because I refused to be a pawn in his silly egocentric games, I had to go.

    I would never work for Mr. David Ellis again.


  50. Zoe
    I posit the view also,that you tend to show the psychopathy of the depressed.

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading