LIME FLOW and DAVID
Submitted by David Weekes
Dear Mrs. Sealy,
I write with reference to your response to my matter at caption – your reference # 4/14/20 (447). The reason that I have written is because i am so absolutely disappointed by your findings.
Miss Emily Ronalds, the Abbey School circa 1965 taught using the Royal Reader series (You should know it well, you attended that institution) She once told our class a story of “The Fox who was guarding the chickens” and these many years hence I am unfortunately reminded of this anecdote.
I have spent no less than 10 hours with your staff reciting the circumstances of this skulduggery with LIME. To receive your letter about “the commission is of the view that LIME has addressed the matters raised has caused me some serious pause as to the calibre of the Fair Trading Commission and I will explain that statement.
LIME is speaking concocted untruths and my Affadavit which I have attached for your reading pleasure will show how LIME operated and operates. I have had these problems for 14 years and they have adopted “interim fixes” which they pass off to the FTC as agreed positions and the FTC incredibly accepts them, sine any further investigation!
They owe me no less than $100,000 and in spite of my approaching your Commission to have my matter ventilated to the fullest extent under your mandate, I receive this “pass it off letter” one that is not befitting of the sole agency tasked with the responsibility of protecting the public from this telecommunications behemoth.
It is indeed a sad thing when we have come to a point where those that are tasked with guarding the rights of the common man are content to abdicate these responsibilities and to allow these giants “to bestride this world like Colossii, while we, like petty men, do butt around and find ourselves dishonourable graves”. Poor people like me can scarce afford the Law Courts of Barbados so I come to the Fair Trading Commission, not to have you accept everything that LIME writes to you, but to represent the rights of us small people.
I have grown tired of this game Mrs Sealy and I, citizen on my way out of this skirmish, no longer will play by these games that FTC, and others of your institutions that are set up to protect us small people, are disposed to employ. If you do not stand in the way of the behemoth there is no one else with the ability to do this and I see your letter as an indication of your unwillingness and stark inability to fulfil your mandate.
Juxtapose my affidavit and its appendices against their well crafted response and see who is telling the truth. Further to that assertion, tell me how many people who LIME is purported to be continuing to bilk, have (i) the presence of mind to keep 14 years of email records with these criminals, (ii) the resources to put them in court or (iii) the ability euphemism for balls to fight them as one would think that the FTC is mandated to do.
Your entity was, contrary to your closing statement in your letter, “of no assistance to me” and would really need to man up to this LIME if the average man or woman is to have equitable service for the monetary consideration we render them every month.
A Citizen in a state of constant dissatisfaction seeing what our country is becoming while guardians like FTC abdicate its duties.