← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by the Mahogany Coconut Think tank and Watchdog Group

As is customary, we join with other commentators, that review the year and what gains, if any, the region would have made. As much as it distresses us, we are forced to conclude that 2014 brought nothing new to the region and that 2015 portends little. We are reaching the end of 2014 with most economies still reeling from a world recession that occasionally fools us that it is over.

Within the region, our strongest economy, Trinidad and Tobago, appears to be facing unexpected challenges because of falling oil prices. This reality has forced the Central Bank to review growth predictions downward. Coupled with widespread state corruption and an election that will reveal the ugliest use of the dollar bill to buy votes; it is sadly obvious that T&T seems set for more malfeasance and stupidity in its governance.

In Guyana the President has created a constitutional crisis by attempting to run the country while ignoring parliament, for his glaringly nefarious political objectives. We are aware and have warned that the longer race continues to dominate Guyana’s politics, the longer it would take for this potentially great country to confront and eradicate its socio-economic problems.

Jamaica has convinced itself that the formula concocted by the International Fund has worked miracles. While we throw no cold water on the optimism that the current regime embraces, we are forever aware that the IMF usually boasts of successful remedies/medicines even when the patient dies!

Barbados finds itself technically broke as the administration tries everything from laying off public workers to internal cabinet squabbles regarding economic and now agricultural policy. In the mean time, the poor are being exposed to deteriorating social services. Armed crime is posing a major problem for law enforcement and the administration cannot even develop a proper garbage collection policy.

Opposition parties throughout the region have no true alternative plans to rescue the economies but are determined to just oppose for opposing sake, hoping to get their greedy hands in the cookie jar as soon as possible. Politics throughout the region is adversarial and non-productive. A collective inferior leadership has failed to produce a progressive economic program.

While we have identified the so-called big four of the region, we must inform that all the other islands are at various stages of economic and social decline. While they seldom come under the radar, we are aware that: political corruption, nepotism, crime and high levels of employment make up most of their socio-economic menu.

The Mahogany Coconut Group will never give up on the hope for a united Caribbean Nation but we must honestly conclude that 2014 has not brought our hopes and dreams any closer to reality. The situation would be perhaps beyond repair if the Caribbean masses were not resourceful and creative.

We fear that such resourcefulness and creativity is under threat by the inferior leadership now responsible for our destiny.

The struggle continues

We extend the very best wishes to all in 2015.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

98 responses to “CARICOM Continues to be Challenged by Governance and Economic Issues”


  1. […] CARICOM Continues to be Challenged by Governance and Economic Challenges […]


  2. […] CARICOM Continues to be Challenged by Governance and Economic Issues […]


  3. Funny how regional commentators instinctively leave out the Bahamas when they discuss regional issues. Surely, in terms of size of the economy, the ‘big four’ are Trinidad, Jamaica, The Bahamas and, presumably, Barbados. In terms of population size, it would be Jamaica, Trinidad, Guyana and the Bahamas.

    And Trinidad the ‘strongest economy’?? Please.


  4. Caricom has always reminded me of Christianity. In the name of self service it is invoked and spoken of as if it is the conventional practice. That is until there is profit to be had, so that the partners can be conveniently discarded or placed on the back burner. Big brother CAL continues to choke the shit out of its sibling named LIAT, while who pays the most gets the least in terms of service and still have not yet realized why they are seen as CARICLOWNS.


  5. Sinckler dropped several pegs in the eyes of the BU household when he reversed his position on the EPA EU.

    Here is an old blog that addressed the matter:

    https://barbadosunderground.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/epa-cariforum-eu-caricom-barbados/

    Surprisingly this matter seems to have died or become irrelevant to Caricom.


  6. Collaboration/Cohesion/Cooperation(functional included) is required, not the current dog eat dog Competition based approach that reigns.


  7. In my opinion no one seam to know how to truly define CARICOM and the policies of this grouping. it is clear to me that it is more like a dog eat dog situation with those regions who believe that they are the big boys/girls, and they should determine the policies and direction of the region and where it should go even though there’s a continuing economic downfall. You have an established court system that is making laws and charging islands heavy fines for disrespecting these laws. Why Cant we have one collective proportionate governing body to manage the affairs of the region? Is it solely because of jealously, pride or stupidity? Economically the Caribbean basin is weak as individual entities and the decline will continue. Together a balance can be achieve by pooling certain resources and streamlining the thrust towards one collective, one nation, One Country. Thus, ‘One Passport’. This unification will bring about stability and drive towards a dominant force in the world market. Why not try a referendum on the question of one Country within the region. That would be the starting point where the citizens can speak collectively. Not the politicians.


  8. In a word insularity.

    If you listen to the oldsters who worked on the Panama Canal the insularity existed in that situation as well, low islanders etc.

    We should concentrate on identifying areas to cooperate but governing a one space will not happen in our lifetime.

    On Monday, 29 December 2014, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >


  9. We in this region do not rightly know who we are.
    We label ourselves or are labeled
    (a) Caribbean|
    (b) West Indies
    (c) Greater Antilles
    (d) Lesser Antilles
    (e) Windward Islands
    (f) Leeward Islands
    (g) Caricom
    (h) Low Islands
    (i) South American
    (j) Central American
    (k) OEC -Organisation of Eastern Caribbean
    We even talk of having the Atlantic Ocean on one side and the Caribbean Sea on the other, when every primary school child knows that the Caribbean Sea is located within the Atlantic Ocean.
    But really and truly ,we are CARIB,….. Crabs,Assorted Residing in Barrels


  10. @David

    That is the big misconception–governng one space. What is required is some powers ceded to CARICOM to implement development related decisions/policies.


  11. @enuff

    The issues dogging Caricom/CSME.

    1. Mobility of labour 2. Movement of capital 3. Trade and Settlement

    On Monday, 29 December 2014, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >


  12. All this talk about needing to group together into a larger entity in order to survive economically is utter hogwash. Has nobody notices that the smaller a country the more likely it is to be wealthy and successful, ESPECIALLY service driven economies???? Hong Kong, Singapore are MUCH better off as small, independent service centres than if they were forced into the hinterland.

    In our own region, it is no accident that smaller countries (like Barbados and the Bahamas) are wealthier, better run and have higher human development than larger ones. To some extent Trinidad bucks this trend, but only because of an oil windfall.

    It is utter madness and without ANY economic validity to say that survivability requires pooling our sovereignty and our economies. The reverse is true. Small, independent, service-based economies that are FULLY INTEGRATED INTO THE WORLD ECONOMY stand nothing to gain by ‘integrating’ with one another. Absolutely nothing.

    This copycat nonsense about ‘look where the world is going – NAFTA, EU etc.’ is so stupid that it couldn’t survive the scrutiny of a child. How can you compare these large, fundamentally different economies to ours. They are different creatures – and we are the lucky ones, not them! It is far easier for a small country with no resources to develop itself quickly and become globally integrated than a big one. That is why the only examples of post-colonial black societies developing to any admirable degree are in the Caribbean.

    Let’s stay friends and work together on sentimental matters, but shift power and resources to Caricom? Never.


  13. @ bahamared

    Amen.

    Thank you….


  14. One of the reasons that there is this negativity toward a full Caribbean Nation is that we have not seen any collective government since the Federation. There is also the belief that we cannot successfully unify because of insularity. Unfortunately, there has been no collective effort to truly unify the region and that is why CARICOM has not progressed as rapidly as it should.Additionally, our educational system is not geared toward producing citizens who can see the entire Caribbean as their homeland. And of course the current group of leaders are basically clueless.
    I take this opportunity y to wish the entire BU family and all contributors a very happy and prosperous new year and hope all will continue to let their voices be heard.
    I sincerely thank BU and its team for allowing me to contribute in their organ. Continued success in all your endeavours.


  15. @Bahamared

    Hong Kong 7.8million
    Singapore 5.5 million
    Jamaica 2.7 million
    Trinidad & Tobago 1.2m
    Bahams 319,00
    Barbados 270,000

    Pick sense from nonsense.


  16. @David
    While we encourage international investors and sell passports! piss in muh pocket.


  17. @Enuff

    UK 65 million

    France 65 million

    USA 315 milion

    China 1.3 billion

    India 1.1 billion

    Hong Kong 7.8 million

    SIngapore 5.5 million

    Dubai 2.1 million

    Malta 380,000

    Bahamas 362,000

    Iceland 300,000

    Barbados 270,000

    Thanks for helping me make my point.


  18. @Enuff

    ……Bermuda 65,000

    Cayman 50,000

    It is difficult to make sense of your post except to understand that you are alleging Hong Kong and Singapore are successful on account of their large population size!

    Any country under 10 million is very small and under 5 million is by some definitions a microstate.

    But the success that countries like ourselves, Barbados, Iceland and Malta have achieved is, like the larger, but still small asian statelets you mention, not predicated on the size of the local market but the extemt of our integration into the international economy.

    How exactly is integrating into Caricom going to help us sell international services (tourism, financial services, data hosting, you name it) to the wider world?


  19. Bahamared
    You said small and gave Hong Kong and Singapore as examples. I merely pointed out that maybe, just maybe, there is small and then too small. By the way The Bahamas is one of the bigger, both physically and in population size, Caricom member states.


  20. The point, Enuff, as you well know is that the size is IRRELEVANT as a factor of success in this world.
    THEREFORE resources that are expended in seeking to GAIN SIZE are wasted….PLEASE TELL YOUR FRIEND OWEN.

    As bahamared has pointed out, the common factors that lead to success are innovation, productivity, creativity, assertiveness ….he calls it “integrating into the international economy” ….Bushie calls it “kicking ass” and being best at what ever it is that you do…. 🙂

    It requires appointing PERFORMANCE DRIVEN managers; dealing with useless brass bowls; cutting out corruption and waste…. all those things that we currently ignore….

    If anything, one can argue that it is EASIER to effect the needed changes in a SMALL country than it is in a larger more complex one.

    In sum…..
    what CARICOM what?!?


  21. Of course the contributions for and against a United Caribbean forgot the mighty superpower called the United States of America and the former superpower called Great Britain and the Commonwealth.To include Hong Kong in the mix is pure nonsense.China will eventually rein in HongKong and Taiwan even if not in our lifetime.


  22. Do Singaporeans need visas to enter the USA? Isn’t Malta, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands part of the EU? What is the relationship between Iceland and the EU? CARICOM, what’s that?!! Is Jamaica, Belize, Guyana (with its abundance of natural resources), Grenada, St.Vincent, St. Lucia, Dominica or Antigua doing well? By the way how is the Bahamas doing? Not so well if what I read is true (10th highest homicide rate in the world and one of the highest levels of incarceration)!!. The future of CARICOM is to become like Haiti.

    http://www.ft.com/ig/sites/2013/caribbean-islands-at-sea/

    Check out a list of countries and dependent areas under 2000 square miles and/or populations under 3 million. Besides Singapore and Trinidad which of them are doing well that are not associated with either the EU, the USA, Australia or New Zealand?

    Why does the average Guadeloupean, or Virgin Islander or Caymanian or Bermudian or Aruban or Saint Maartener lives at a higher standard of living than we (Bajans or Bahamians) do?

    Integrate into what global economy?!!! You mean the North Atlantic Economy with its Asian associates China, India and Australia.


  23. @enuff

    I will take your points on one by one.

    Singaporeans do not need visas to enter the USA. Neither do Bahamians. Nor do Bahamians need visas to enter the UK, Schengen states, Japan or any other ‘developed’ country. The only countries that Bahamians need visas to enter are Third World countries, mostly in Africa. I have a Bahamian and a US passport and I can tell you two important countries that I can only enter using the Bahamian one without a visa: China and Brazil.

    Guadeloupe and Martinique do NOT have a higher standard of living than the Bahamas (or I believe than Barbados either). The average Bermudian or Caymanian does only because of the tiny population.

    The murder rate in the Bahamas has little to do with this, which shows you are driven by emotion rather than reason. What is the connection?? In fact the murder rate has more to do with closeness to the US and the availability of guns than the failure of our economic model, which has clearly been anything but a failure, given the level of development and attractiveness as a migrant destination.

    Nobody migrates from the Bahamas looking for work and remittances from the Bahamas last year were 144 million dollars, making it a far larger net remitter per capita than the US. So how does the murder rate (attributable mostly to a dysfunctional bail system and closeness to the gun-exporting USA) negate the success of the economic model?

    The Bahamas and Barbados are successful precisely because they are integrated into the world economy. You talk of the North Atlantic economy, but add China in only as an ‘associate’ of the US? Get real. China holds so much of the US’ sovereign debt that the idea of US sovereignty is a joke.


  24. @Bahamared

    I think you were responding to Ping Pong. lol


  25. sorry, that should have been @ping pong.

    I just noticed u said the average Virgin Islander has a higher standard of living than Bahamians or Bajans. Have you been drinking something? Next you will say Puerto Ricans have a higher standard of living!

    U.S. Virgin Islanders (and all that I have known have been immigrants living in the Bahamas) are, like Puerto Ricans, reduced to a life of food stamps and housing projects as most of their GDP comes from federal welfare transfers. They, like Puerto Ricans, have a lower GDP per capita than the Bahamas, according to both the IMF and world Bank.

    Have you actually been to the Bahamas? You need to get your facts straight.


  26. @ Ping Pond
    …by “integrate into the global economy” bahamared is obviously talking about establishing RELEVANCE, especially as a service economy, in that you provide the kind of services that those who can afford to buy, want.

    Obviously there are anomalies.
    Some countries find themselves tied to the coattails of successful economies by history (the French Islands, Bermuda, Cayman etc)
    Some are lucky to have oil. Some may have some other unique feature.

    Most small countries fell into the same trap that we did…. by borrowing themselves back into slavery…..driven by greed and idiocy.

    HOWEVER, the fact is that there are MANY already LARGE countries, with natural resources, who are in duck’s gut.

    So large or small, success is about good management, vision, creativity and flexibility.

    All Bushie is saying is that RATHER than expend effort and resources trying to come together for old-time-sake, we should use such resources to achieve the attributes that bring success….. wuh the same goes for Africa and other MASSIVE countries…..

  27. Easy Squeeze (make no riot) Avatar
    Easy Squeeze (make no riot)

    As an outsider, I think the islands are small and people should be allowed to island hop
    http://youtu.be/OEhzz13fmGw


  28. @Bushie

    Expanding your population and size provides opportunities for greater “innovation, productivity and creativity”.

    We are already integrated into the global economy, it is called specialisation based on a combination of location and accidental/natural advantages. It is why rum, tourism and offshore sectors have survived thus far and not manufacturing. As I have said before, we need innovative and creative solutions applied to the processes and systems that exist within our society that hinder productivity and the maximisation of our specialist skills .


  29. @ping pong

    What is Iceland’s relationship with the EU? Same as my relationship with the Emperor of Siam – there ain’t one.

    Malta is a member of the EU, but as its wealth per capita is slightly lower than that of the Bahamas, that fact hardly pushes your point.

    Bermuda and Cayman are internally self-governed, as Barbados and the Bahamas were prior to independence. You may have heard of the ‘three B’s’ (Bermuda, Bahamas, Barbados), which were the only British colonies aside from Canada, Australia and NZ left with internal self-government after the alarm caused by the Morant Bay rebellion in Jamaica in 1864.

    My point is that Barbados and the Bahamas must be seen in the context of their colleagues (Malta, Iceland, Cyprus etc.) both in terms of population size and economic development, and the roles they play in the global economy (small centres of sophisticated services). Trying to push them into a regional grouping that reduces their sovereignty can have no positive effect on that role.

    I am, frankly, still trying to understand the thrust of your ‘points’.


  30. @Bushie
    We spend too much borrowed money (hence heavily indebted) and lose too much income trying to out maneouvre each other.


  31. @ Enuff
    Expanding your population and size provides opportunities for greater “innovation, productivity and creativity”
    ++++++++++++++++++
    LOL
    where you got that from boss? the minister of eddy kashun?

    Expanding your population and size only provides more brass bowls to confuse the damn place.

    Innovation, creativity and productivity are products of RIGHTEOUS LEADERSHIP, the tactful management of resources, and a SENSIBLE education system.

    It does NOT come from stupid outdated eddy kashun schemes; promoting political yardfowls; giving favors in exchange for sex; appointing chicken feed mixers as supervisor of insurance or by allowing a known thief to walk free just because he is not a leper.

    How much time and money did your man spend trying to get CARICOM going? …now THAT is what Bushie calls WASTE……


  32. @BushTea

    Stupse!!


  33. Bahamared

    Enuff didn’t write the post you are responding to.

    The Bahamian economy is one of the most vulnerable economies in the Caribbean. I will grant you credit that they were smart to stay clear of CARICOM and maintain/cultivate its association/ relationship/ connection (whatever word you want use) with the US and the EU (eg. Freeport, etc) and now with China (BahamasMar). However it is undeniable that the offshore financial sector is under threat with the desire of rich countries to stem the loss of tax revenue (FACTA ?) and that tourism remains vulnerable to such things as natural disasters, epidemics or….. crime waves.

    Bahamas may be holding its own but Barbados is an accident happening in slow motion and the standard of living in all those islands mentioned is higher than that found in Barbados. We use to be around the 30’s rank in HDI now we are down to 59 and falling. One can spin it how which way but the dependent territories mentioned enjoy their high standard of living precisely because they are part of the EU or the US. The Bahamas proximity to the US is a factor in its development

    The fact is that I am agreeing with you that CARICOM is a waste of time. The so called “global” economy is really the US, the EU, China, India, Australia and Japan. That China holds so much US sovereign debt is all the more reason that it is in China’s interest that the US economy remains strong. I am further pointing out that if we do not associate with those countries we will be going nowhere fast. The problem is that we (B’dos) do not seem to be offering much and as it is said pride goes before a fall.


  34. Bush Tea

    you know you are just tormenting the natives…good management, vision, creativity?!!! Who is offering those things or more critically who really wants these things particularly when these mean work, responsibility, moderation, cooperation, integrity, values and all similar “disgusting” concepts.


  35. @ ping pong

    We have been hearing about this supposed ‘vulnerability’ of the Bahamian economy for a long time. It mostly comes from ‘experts’ from the US and elsewhere who seem to understand economics only in retrospect. It also comes from regional people, mostly Jamaicans, who feel you need to grow or manufacture something to be being productive. Most of the latter I have heard this from were actually here working.

    Thankfully, no Bahamian government has taken such talk seriously, and the country continues to show (even during global recessions) an ability to keep moving ahead. I completely disagree that there is any vulnerability to be associated with a small, nimble, open economy that follows its comparative advantages. But I will leave the talk to those who think they know better.

    I know Barbados well, having spent lots of time there and having an uncle who was head of one of the Canadian banks there for years. If you take from this little horrid recession the lesson that following the pursuit of your comparative advantage as a small, service-oriented economy somehow leaves you vulnerable, then you will have drawn a wrong and harmful lesson from it.

    I can think of few less vulnerable places than either the Bahamas or Barbados. Let the outsiders keep talking. But our two countries are the most advanced black countries on the planet in HDI and wealth of the population, and that is no accident. The model that is now being dragged through the dirt, has delivered.

    Despite the recession, the rate of (mostly infrastructural) development in the Bahamas has actually accelerated in the last few years and with the explosion of economic activity that Baha Mar, Albany, RW Bimini and other projects will bring in 2015, the economy will clearly expand dramatically in the next decade.

    Barbados is simply a little further out geographically, but the same will ensue there. It is just too well placed and has too many comparative advantages for it not to.

    I agree with you on Caricom. But we must agree to disagree on the prospects of small, open Caribbean economies on their present course.


  36. @ bahamared
    you are wrong about Barbados though….
    Special place….
    …here we have managed to take a perfectly good winning hand, throw the cards on the floor and now we are searching for some kind descendants of our former slave masters to step in and set up plantations to run the country for us….

    Our per capita numbers are still deceptively impressive, but mainly because we have imported a lotta rich foreign people who own and control every shiite. When you divide up the money the average looks good, but these people own 40% and COW and Bizzy own another 40%….
    LOL …time you subtract Bushie’s loot the average Bajan barely have enough to get into the next reggae fete…

    You probably won’t understand what is happening here ….since wunna fellows in Free Port may not be familiar with brass bowls….

    @ Enuff
    LOL …what happen boss?
    tek care you don’t swallow yuh teeth…. LOL


  37. What are we really discussing?

    How to sustain an economic model to support conspicuous consumption?

    How to support an innate human characteristic of greed?


  38. Do you fancy working for a company that has a little more than 500 employees and has the following statistics?:

    • 29 have been accused of spousal abuse
    • 7 have been arrested for fraud
    • 19 have been accused of writing bad checks
    • 117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses
    • 3 have done time for assault
    • 71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
    • 14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
    • 8 have been arrested for shoplifting
    • 21 are currently defendants in lawsuits
    • 84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year …

    Can you guess which organization this is?

    Given up yet?

    It’s the 535 members of the United States Congress. The same group that cranks out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us in line.
    ………………………………………………………………………………………………….

    How do we match up?


  39. @ David
    What are we really discussing?

    How to sustain an economic model to support conspicuous consumption?

    How to support an innate human characteristic of greed?
    ++++++++++++++++++++++

    OF COURSE THAT IS THE MOOT.

    What else?

    How many years now Bushie has been trying to get us to look BEYOND the glitter of greed to the REAL values of life on this planet – and no one is interested….
    …all we want to discuss is GDP, HDI and politics….

    you think anyone is interested in the REAL meaning of life? …or what REAL success is?
    so…
    When in Rome…..

  40. Easy Squeeze (make no riot) Avatar
    Easy Squeeze (make no riot)

    money is not as important as pussy or is that spirituality


  41. @ Ping Pong

    The point I am making is that your position (although you do not favour Caricom integration) is essentially the same as many of those who do. It boils down to ‘we are intrinsically small, vulnerable and weak and at the end of the day, the world belongs to the big white boys’

    This kind of thinking comes from West African fatalism, a powerful phenomenon that is one of the first things that strikes Western visitors to West Africa. The acceptance of one’s place in the world that prevents west Africans from taking the tiniest initiative to improve their surroundings is part of the same thing that leads people in our region to call themselves ‘developing’ countries, long after they have passed any possible goal post of ‘developed’ status.

    I recently heard some Caricom lady complaining that being ‘Graduated’ to Middle income status will hinder the region!!!!!! If the world thinks we are almost equal to them, they will stop giving aid. What backward, reverse thinking! Yet it is typical of the victimhood mentality that animates the Caricom project.

    The problem with the victimood/Caricom thinking is that it does HUGE damage to political and economic decision-making, by making leaders focus on remedial matters rather than chasing opportunities to thrive.

    People love to contrast our region negatively with Singapore. But look at the reality. In terms of location, the Bahamas (and probably Jamaica) are at least as favoured as Singapore in logistics etc. With miniscule efforts, we have achieved results that Singapore took a generation to achieve. In 1997, there was no container port in Grand Bahama. Today, there is the largest container transshipment port along the Eastern Seaboard of the USA. In 1997, there was no maritime industrial concerns in the country. Today, the Freeport Ship Repair facility is the largest cruise ship repair facility on earth and (according to the US State department) the largest industrial concern in the Caribbean region. Grand Bahama has a population of 50,000!

    Yet owing to that same African fatalism and self-doubt government did not take these decisions until it was staring them in the face. Someone had to come in from outside and show them how well placed Grand Bahama was for such developments.

    Now we hear about being ‘reliant’ (i.e. doing well at something) on tourism makes you vulnerable. As Bahamians sat around grumbling about the recession (encouraged by victim-hood-sellers), nobody seemed to notice the $3.6 Billion Baha Mar project rising into the sky- even though it is the largest construction site currently underway in North America. They open in March and are now busily seeking applications for the 7,000 positions being created. But somehow we are ‘uniquely vulnerable’.

    Over in Jamaica, now that they are finally weaned off this notion that services cannot dominate a ‘real’ economy, government is nonetheless facing massive push-back about its excellent plan to create a comprehensive logistics hub to rival Singapore and Dubai. One the one hand, it is shrugged off as pie-in-the-sky, while on the other, the environmental lobby are scaremongering about how it will destroy Jamaica’s iguanas. Yet if that plan is carried out with any kind of competence Jamaica will indeed join Singapore and Dubai as an international logistics hub.

    African fatalism. The last thing people so afflicted need to be told is that they are victims of time, place and history. They will eat it up and do what scared, insecure people always do: NOTHING.

  42. Easy Squeeze (make no riot) Avatar
    Easy Squeeze (make no riot)

    ” West African fatalism ” 500 years Slavery Racism White Supremacy
    50 years independence
    http://youtu.be/WIzU-cKkEIw


  43. @ Easy Squeeze

    There we go again with that fatalism. ‘My plight is somebody else’s fault and responsibility”.

    It is amazing how persistent a trait that is among West African populations.

    I have spent a lot of time in Japan and one feature of their culture that is most admirable is, when asked about historic grievances and suffering, the Japanese response is almost always the same. The only country to have been nuked (still in living memory), their feeling on the matter is simple: it is our fault. Why? “Because we lost”. Taking responsibility for your own fate. Imagine a little bit of that mindset in this region!

    For the record, Africans, and not Europeans bear the largest share of the shame on slavery. The institution was LONG banished in Europe (since the dark ages). But it still thrived in Africa when contact with the Europeans took place. In fact, it still thrives in Africa today!!!!!! But because Africans have for so long been trained to pass responsibility on to others and to act the role of the victim, it is scarcely an issue.

    Europeans bought enslaved Africans from other Africans. They did not invent the institution of African slavery. It was utterly alien to them. They merely took advantage of one savage aspect of west African culture. Throughout the period of western slavery, it would have been illegal to enslave a person. It would be called kidnapping under the English Common Law. The institution was only available in the case of those who came from Africa already in that condition and their descendants. Once manumitted, you could not re-enslave a person, unlike in Africa.

    This victimhood nonsense is not only tiresome. It is self destructive. Like the blacks in America find all the energy to mobilise themselves when one white cop shoots a black guy. But nobody seems the least concerned how many thousands of blacks are killed by other blacks in a senseless culture of violence that has become a norm.

    That is the same victimhood mentality that animates Caricom. Poor little black us. Please!

  44. He'll Take Care Of You Avatar
    He’ll Take Care Of You

    White propaganda and Lies won’t hide guilt in Reparations for Slavery Case


  45. Will ‘reparations’ ever help black societies to take responsibility for themselves? I doubt it. In fact, it will compound their dependency and the sense that they are not free agents of their fate.

    This is an interesting Berkeley study on the fatalism I am talking
    about:http://cega.berkeley.edu/assets/miscellaneous_files/wgape/21_Miguel.pdf


  46. @ bahamared December 31, 2014 at 10:29 AM,

    Your comments prior to 10:29 were very interesting and challenging in complete contrast to your stereotypical rambling at 10:29.

    The history of Japan and Africa (and her descendants) are incomparable. Your analogy was truly terrible. Japan was a coloniser and hated by her neighbours; and was a country renowned for her level of brutality against others. It was “colonised” after the second world for a brief period and was partnered by the USA whose sole purpose was to create a compliant Japan who it hoped would gravitate towards the American economic model; and within time become a major ally and an economic partner of Uncle Sam.

    No such lofty ambitions existed for the African continent and her diaspora.

    Caricom could and should be a force for good. The example of Barbados, Jamaica and Trinidad who maintained close relationships with Cuba – during the early seventies – despite the external pressure that it faced from America was the stuff of legend.

    The fact that Caricom has been a relative failure over the years should be put down to her leaders past and present and not those of her citizens.

    Happy 2015 to all!

  47. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ bahamared December 31, 2014 at 10:29 AM
    “This victimhood nonsense is not only tiresome. It is self destructive. Like the blacks in America find all the energy to mobilise themselves when one white cop shoots a black guy.”

    Although your arguments do have some merit in explaining the current state of mental bondage portrayed the previously physically enslaved African in the West (Diaspora) there are still a number of holes that need plugging if you want to convince us that the white man or Western European ought to be exonerated from the act of slavery aka genocide both physically culturally.

    For examples:
    The Western European especially the Catholics from the Iberian peninsula deliberate decimation of the indigenous populations of the South & North American continents and the Caribbean.
    We are certain you know of your own San Salvador history when the natives of the what is known today as the Bahamian archipelago save Columbus’s sorry ass from starvation and thirst.

    How do you explain the western European sailing to, what we call today, Australia and New Zealand and killing off many of the natives and taking their lands and resources. Similar thing happened in South Africa and Zimbabwe; lands the white man found to be hospitable for his existence.

    The question to you, therefore, is whether these “victims” of European genocide, exploitation and colonisation are also victims of ‘self-destruction’ like American and Caribbean blacks or is it something ordained by Nature or by your European god as clearly stated in your religious text and prescribed by the Pope or King James et al?


  48. @millertheanunnaki December 31, 2014 at 4:53 PM #

    Tribes have killing off each other over many millenia…..same melanin…..different melanin does not matter.

    What holes do you want plugged…….tribalism is part of our genetic make up….how are you going to eradicate it?

  49. Have Mercy On Me Avatar

    manilla, cowrie shells and glass beads jewellery is not payment for children lives
    although portable is worthless currency

    the tribalism feuds explains the illegal selling of lives that do not belong to their own family and tribe

    illegal actions which are not excusable

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading