Study of Caribbean Men Who Have Sex With Men Launched

Submitted by Cedriann Martin – UNAIDS Caribbean Communications Officer

Please find attached a press release on the launch of the Caribbean Men’s Internet Survey (CARIMIS)–the region’s largest study of men who have sex with men and the first such research to be conducted online.

Launch soundbites from Dr. Ernest Massiah, UNAIDS Caribbean Regional Support Team Director and Dereck Springer, Director of the Pan Caribbean Partnership against HIV and AIDS (PANCAP) are attached. You may also post/play/hyperlink our message videos:

Meet the men of CARIMIS


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZY2rsoWy0g

Men’s sexuality is diverse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGtfCUteHAs

Who’s out, who’s not and so what?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxH_SDYGApU

How many CARIMIS men experience self-stigma and abuse?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1LCRX-UrJc

CARIMIS men and sexual health

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17YIx-E-muA

CAPTIONS:

4359: UNAIDS Caribbean Regional Support Team Director, Dr Ernest Massiah (from left), Chairperson of the Trinidad and Tobago Equal Opportunity Commission, Lynette Seebaran-Suite, UNAIDS Caribbean Communications Officer, Cedriann Martin, Coordinator of the Community Action Resource, David Soomarie and Director of the Pan Caribbean Partnership against HIV and  AIDS (PANCAP), Dereck Springer.
4449: UNAIDS Caribbean Regional Support Team Director, Dr Ernest Massiah (left) and Director of the Pan Caribbean Partnership against HIV and  AIDS (PANCAP), Dereck Springer.

92 comments

  • Pingback: Study of Caribbean Men Who Have Sex With Men Launched - Vibe Audio StationVibe Audio Station

  • John Hanson 1781-1782

    that is some real shit

    Like

  • coming from one who have had only a short life span you are talking shite too

    Like

  • Is it possible just once that even of you disagree with a position the findings of the survey can be critiques n an intelligent manner?

    BU is willing to bet the five videos remain unwatched.

    Like

  • What the survey brings to light is that we have men who are having sex with BOTH men and women.

    We have men who are homosexuals sleeping with only women.

    It is complicated, it is happening, deal with it.

    Like

  • David what this brings to light is we should use condoms unless we are in a committed monogamous relationship.

    Like

  • Pingback: Study of Caribbean Men Who Have Sex With Men Launched - Black Caribbean On-Line

  • what it brings to light is that they are people who have to lived their lives under the sheets of darkness fear of being ostracized,

    Like

  • For too long we have supposed that MALE and FEMALE, discrete, complete, entirely distinct are all that is – which is strange given the pedigree of androgyny. I don’t think the survey adds very much in the greater scheme of things. But, yes, to the narrow-minded bigots in our region maybe it will prove an eye opener – if they have eyes prepared to see.

    Like

  • The other thing that strikes me is that this is a survey about MEN. The sexual complexities of WOMEN are equally deserving of attention. Why MEN? Is it because in the standard understanding whereas homosexuality is an abomination lesbianism is simply a turn on. There are no threats to lesbians in the OT and even Paul is a bit cock-eyed about it. But then imagine – God turned men gay as a punishment for ingratitude. Yeah for ‘Christianity’….or did it die with Jesus?

    Like

  • re
    whereas homosexuality is an abomination lesbianism is simply a turn on. There are no threats to lesbians in the OT and even Paul is a bit cock-eyed about it.
    ROSS YOU ARE CLEARLY A BIBLE ILLITERATE
    WHY DONT YOU GO READ ROMANS ONE FOR A START BEFORE ENGAGING IN BOVINE EFFLUENT ON BU LIKE BALAAM’S ASS

    Like

  • David

    Why would you be astonished about bisexuality? The survey hasn’t ‘discovered’ this. It is at least as old as Plato. Where do you think the boy-bonkers went at the end of the day?

    Like

  • Oh GP

    An effulgence of Christian charity as usual. What a poor specimen you are. I stand by the sense of what I wrote. Try finding some yourself.

    Like

  • Dr. Georgie Porgie: I haven’t see you lately. I thought that you were one of those deeply religious docors and had gone to West Africa to help your brethen.

    Like

  • @ac October 28, 2014 at 8:58 PM “what it brings to light is that they are people who have to lived their lives under the sheets of darkness fear of being ostracized,”

    But ac don’t we all live our sex lives under the sheets of darkness? I don’t know the last day I saw 2 or more people doing IT on Broad Street at midday, or in the supermarket, or in church or in the Market on a Saturday morning, or at the National Stadium at 4 on a Saturday afternoon.

    IT is always done behind closed doors, or under the sheets of darkness.

    Because I am almost as old as Bush Tea and I’ve never yet seen anybody doing IT, even though I am sure that a lot of IT goes on…but it seems always the sheets of darkness.

    Like

  • Hants | October 28, 2014 at 8:34 PM |
    David what this brings to light is we should use condoms unless we are in a committed monogamous relationship.
    …………………………………………………………………………………….
    or buy one of those spots in Cleremont ,and do as the Romans do

    Like

  • @ROSS THE BIBLE ILLITERATE

    ROMANS 1
    26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

    27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
    THE REFERENCES ABOVE ARE AS CLEAR AS CRYSTAL
    Paul is NOT a bit cock-eyed about HOMOSEXUALITY
    Q E D
    I REST MY CASE

    Simple Simon | October 28, 2014 at 9:50 PM |
    Dr. Georgie Porgie: I haven’t see you lately. I thought that you were one of those deeply religious docors and had gone to West Africa to help your brethen.

    NO
    IF I CANT GET A JOB THERE NORMALLY BECAUSE I AM NOT BOARD CERTIFIED
    WHY CAN I GO TO TREAT EBOLA ? I AM STILL NOT BOARD CERTIFIED

    Like

  • IN ROMANS ONE PAUL CLEARLY OUTLINES THE AETIOLOGY OF SEXUAL PERVERSION SO THAT BIBLE ILLITERATES LIKE ROSS CAN BE REBUKED AND REBUTTED IN 2014

    ROMANS 1:18-28

    Revelation of God derided
    Rejection of God preferred
    Rationalization of God’s Word decided
    Reversal of Truth presented
    Religious perversion accepted
    Reprobate minds adopted
    Ravishing appetites practiced
    Retribution of God delivered

    Like

  • St George's Dragon

    @ GP
    Your references are, of course, only of much relevance to Christians. That would be approximately 33% of the world’s population; so presumably 67% couldn’t care less.

    Like

  • YOU ARE QUITE CORRECT presumably 67% couldn’t care less.
    BUT A DAY IS COMING WHEN THEY WILL CARE!

    mY references are, of course, of much relevance in debunking ross’s assertions——and you know it!

    Like

  • GP

    Oh dear – are you still being a poor specimen? You really don’t come over as very bright. …..just a dull, unimaginative, pedantic oaf who can read. Consider Matt 13:13.

    Now tell me………

    What did Paul give as the reason for gayness? As you say “god gave them up”….tell the world what v21 (which you don’t quote) says.

    Granted that biblically there is no condemnation of lesbianism UNTIL Paul – or do you deny that?- please explain if you can my reference to Paul being “cock-eyed”.

    Let me help you.

    Consider Paul’s misogyny….as a proponent of women’s rights in the name of the Lord he doesn’t pass muster does he…in fact a rather poor specimen himself?

    Consider the theory advanced by some respected scholars that Paul himself was gay – that his gayness was his “thorn in flesh”. It would explain, wouldn’t it, his totally potty idea that God MADE people gay and why. It would, for Paul, be the great cop out….and might just explain his self-hatred?

    How do we explain yours? But I say again, if you spent less time in pushing Christianity and more in practising it, the world would be a better place. And, since you’re one hell of a biblical scholar you say, I suppose I don’t need to tell you to read the Gospel lesson (Anglican) for Sunday coming – Matt 23:1-12 . Please tell us whether the fellas Jesus cautions us about remind you of anyone. Use a mirror if it helps.

    Like

  • Well I have seen all the videos, and listened to what was said. I refuse to judge anyone. I’m old-fashion, I’ll continue to do Adam and Eve as I have been from my first encounter. I often wondered how a man can be attracted to another man. But to each his own.

    At the end of my time on this earth, whoever we must to meet to answer for all that we have done while on this earth. I am sure that I will never have to answer for what anyone else has done.

    Christianity in these days seem to have made so many changes to accommodate all the choices that people are making. Like for instance, a pastor, preacher, or whatever title he holds, can be as gay as all out doors standing in front of his congregation preaching the word from the bible. Which by the way, has had many changes over the years. But his excuse is that he’s just the messenger.

    This situation is off the chain in both areas, male and female. And it seems that everyone has an answer for the choices that they has made. So what can we do at this point in time except live our own lives the way each of us see fit, and by THE LAWS OF THE MOST HIGH. and allow those who differ deal with the consequences.

    But I feel that all this is a very big part why this world is as it is right about now.

    Like

  • David

    Why would you be astonished about bisexuality? The survey hasn’t ‘discovered’ this. It is at least as old as Plato. Where do you think the boy-bonkers went at the end of the day?

    What matters is that as long as homosexuality has existed we continue to struggle as a global community to integrate this lifestyle preference as an ‘accepted’ way of of life. The survey is giving voice to the whispers that take place behind closed doors.

    Like

  • Men having sex with men. A lifestyle choice which is nasty and unnatural which many also consider immoral but otherwise I guess it’s okay.

    Like

  • the pope most open minded ,one who has the vision to .understand and explore life and all its complexities he understand life cannot be dictated by one set of rules and interpretations, he uses the principle of “flexibility ” a bench marker that gives him the an opportunity to walk in other shoes,

    Like

  • Something puzzles me……… I have looked up the word “homosexual” and all the definitions I found basically states “sexually attracted to members of one’s own sex”. For example:
    Homosexuality (from Ancient Greek ὁμός, meaning “same”, and Latin sexus, meaning “sex”) is romantic attraction, sexual attraction or sexual behavior between members of the same sex or gender. As a sexual orientation, homosexuality is “an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions” primarily or exclusively to people of the same sex. [Wikipedia]

    If this is so, why do we refer to homosexuality as being specifically gender based, i.e. MALE ONLY……. is not a lesbian another name for a female homosexual? Is it not improper or ambiguous, when referring to homosexuals, to say “homosexual and lesbian”, when “homosexual” refers to MALE and FEMALE?

    Another thing that puzzles me is when issues like these arise, we always run to the Bible to quote some scripture to justify it being right or wrong. We brutalise our children and quote Proverbs 13:14 “spare the rod and spoil the child”, to justify our actions.
    For the “bullers” and “wickers” the Bible totting people are quick to quote Genesis 19: 1 – 13, Leviticus 18:22 or 20:13 to condemn such acts. Yet, if a man has anal sex with his wife, these same Bible people, as justification of this act, would quote Hebrews 13:4 “Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled”.

    I do not agree with homosexuality nor do I care who is a homosexual. However, I believe if a woman is a “wicker” stick to women; or if a man is a “buller” he should stick with men rather than have sex with women just to please society. If he/she is man/woman enough to “bull”/”wick”, then be man/woman enough to accept the heat that comes with their choice.
    But what other choice he has but to hide, we live in an unsympathetic society.
    And judging from some responses to this issue, Christians are the most angry, intolerant and judgmental people I know.

    Liked by 1 person

  • What the homosexuality issue does is to expose the hypocrisy of how we manage ourselves as people. In Barbados politicians – on both sides of the political divide – and policymakers, continue to avoid the issue and treat it as a ‘leave outside the off stump’ issue.

    Hypocrisy!

    Like

  • Yawn…!!!
    The world is full of all kinds of shiite. It is called diversity.

    How about a study of men who have sex with cadavers?
    How about men who have sex with sheep?
    How about one on men who have no sex?

    @ David
    What more could we have to say about this bulling thing nuh?
    For the last time Bushie says ……given the amount of spiritual wickedness in our world (country) …..there, but for the grace of God goes any one of us……

    Just as the continuing buildup of garbage, stagnant water and unhygienic practices will INEVITABLY bring us increasing levels of sickness and deseases, so too has the increasing UNRIGHTEOUSNESS, wickedness, and moral nastiness led to increasing “infections” of spiritual deseases such as homosexuality.

    The design model is so obvious …..how can we miss it….?

    Like

  • @Bushie

    The design model is so obvious …..how can we miss it….?

    But with us from time immemorial.

    Like

  • Codename Octopussy

    The Blog Owner says he makes no Money from this Blog . Should I believe him ? Well if that is what he says , well that is how it is. But whose agenda is he serving by bringing this Subject ever so often?

    Type Yes -If you think the Blog Owner should be making money from this Blog
    Type NO if you feel the Blog Owner is a retired School Teacher who doubles as Blog Owner and ac
    Because the only way ac could be on so often is if ac is the Blog Owner, pays the Blog Owner money to be on or is in cahoot with the Blog Owner in some uncanny way.

    So the mystery remains
    The Blog Owner does not make money from this Blog -That is what he says .

    This homoshit is not part of any agenda –or is it

    ac and the Blog owner are one and the same or isn’t it so

    Like

  • Artax

    I suppose it’s obvious as you say. ‘Homo’ = man (as in ‘mankind’) or, as lawyers might say, ‘male includes the female’.

    Hence there was nothing wrong with the rendering of the Nicene creed which in WI, and everywhere else, once said “For us men and our salvation” now changed to ‘for us and our salvation” – sheer linguistic contortion in the name, I suppose, of political correctness.

    The ‘gay pride’ groups refer specifically to ‘gay’, ‘lesbian’, ‘bisexual’ and ‘transgendered’.

    ac

    I agree with you totally about Francis.

    David on whispers

    You mean the open secret. But what is the problem so many have with sex – do they, like Paul, at root think it’s dirty – for Saturday nights, with as much clothing as possible, in the dark, with your wife if you must have it at all? Until we accept it and glory in it how do we sublimate it?

    Like

  • ross
    i repeat my exposition of Romans1:18-28 which is very clear and is sound doctrine that cannot be refuted
    it is not my fault that you can not understand it

    ROMANS 1:18-28

    Revelation of God derided
    Rejection of God preferred
    Rationalization of God’s Word decided
    Reversal of Truth presented
    Religious perversion accepted
    Reprobate minds adopted
    Ravishing appetites practiced
    Retribution of God delivered

    note that the first point is that upon what everything revolves

    Revelation of God derided
    then one thing leads to another

    Like

  • GP

    Mere repetition as you say with little or no imaginative intellect. But it’s OK. Now rest yourself. No sweat. No tears.

    Like

  • When They Knew God

    By David J. Stewart

        Romans 1:16-25, “For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, WHEN THEY KNEW GOD, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.” 
    

    Everyone at Some Point in Life Recognizes God

    Romans chapter one gives us the “progression” of people who have decided to travel the highway of destruction (to ultimate misery and judgment) in hell. Surely, God doesn’t want anyone to perish. The Bible declares that we are responsible for ourselves—we must decide our own fate! Why would a person reject God? Why would any man or woman despise their Creator? It all begins in Romans one with the easily overlooked little phrase, “…WHEN THEY KNEW GOD…” (Romans 1:21). Every man and woman at some point in life “knew God.” The Greek word for “knew” here means “to be aware of” or “to perceive.” Thus, we have all perceived God’s presence at some point in our life. Everyone has had the chance to do what’s right and seek after God.

    King Josiah in the Old Testament grew up in the worst of sinful conditions with ungodly parents and yet he served the Lord and did what was right. Anyone can do right! … “For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to ALL men” (Titus 2:11). God’s “grace” is sufficient for ALL our needs. God is fair! “For the INVISIBLE THINGS of Him from the creation of the world are CLEARLY SEEN…” (Romans 1:20). Wow! The Scriptures teach that we can indeed see invisible things! How? “…being understood BY THE THINGS THAT ARE MADE…” (Romans 1:20). We read in Psalm 19:1-3 that “The heavens declare the glory (goodness) of God; and the firmament SHOWETH His handiwork. Day unto day UTTERETH speech, and night unto night SHOWETH knowledge. There is NO SPEECH NOR LANGUAGE, WHERE THEIR VOICE IS NOT HEARD.”

    Just as with music, nature needs no interpreter. The Scriptures plainly teach that God has provided enough light (through the things that are made) for anyone to clearly see the things (which are invisible). “…even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are WITHOUT EXCUSE: Because that, WHEN THEY KNEW GOD, they glorified (to esteem glorious-honor, magnify) Him not as God, neither were thankful” (Romans 1:20,21). Christ-rejecters are without excuse! Those who will someday die and plunder into hell fire will be without excuse! Anyone can come to the knowledge of the truth if they so desire. We all perceive and become aware of God’s presence at some point in our life. We all must decide to go down one of two possible paths: God’s or our own.

    Most People Turn Away from God, Refusing to Acknowledge Him

    Romans chapter one gives us the step-by-step downfall of those who choose the wrong path by deciding they don’t need God. “…they did not like to RETAIN GOD in their knowledge…” (Romans 1:28). What a sad statement! They simply didn’t want God in their life, not even in their mind.

    It all begins with being unthankful and not honoring God. The word “honor” means “to value.” How can anyone not value and want God? When the Scriptures speak of honoring your parents, it means to value them and treat them as such. Jesus, even while dying on the cross, expressed concern for His mother’s well being after He was gone (John 19:26). Do you value (honor) your parents and God? Can you live just as well without Jesus? No, you can’t! Many today are arrogant and self-righteous and don’t want a Savior. They don’t like God and don’t want to think about Him! They mistreat God.

    They Become Unthankful Towards God

    These people, being unthankful and reluctant to honor God Almighty—became vain and foolish. “…but became vain (empty, silly) in their imaginations, and their FOOLISH HEART WAS DARKENED. Professing themselves to be wise, THEY BECAME FOOLS,” (Romans 1:21,22). So many are foolish today! This lost and wicked world that we are living in today—worships sports and sex; glorifies sin and rebellion; thrives on greed and corruption; practices covetousness and maliciousness; diminishes the sacredness of the family, marriage and God; honors the immoral and heathen; Rejects Christ and has no place or purpose for the Word of God.

    God says; “…they are WITHOUT EXCUSE” (Romans 1:20); “…Who KNOWING the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but HAVE PLEASURE IN THEM THAT DO THEM” (Romans 1:32). This sounds like TV doesn’t it? People have pleasure in watching others commit sin! Adulterers and homosexuals who would never be allowed into your home to commit their evil deeds are welcomed right into your home through the TV set to do the same. No wonder some have called the TV—Hellivision. Is the TV your idol? Don’t be too quick to say “no”! Read your Bible lately? How much time do you spend watching the box? Idolatry is anything that means more to you than God.

    They Become Fools in Their Sinful Pride

    By nature man is full of pride, arrogance and self-righteousness. For those who avoid God, live in sin and “do-their-own-thing”—they must redefine God and His truth to maintain self-respect. So they change, discredit and misquote God’s Word. They have a distorted view of God. “And CHANGED the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image…” (Romans 1:23). “Who CHANGED the truth of God into a lie…” (Romans 1:25). So they explain away God and His Holy Word with silly thinking and worldly philosophy. “PROFESSING THEMSELVES TO BE WISE, they became fools” (Romans 1:22). Are you a fool? Did you travel down the wrong path in life after the time “when you knew God?”

    What a statement—“WHEN THEY KNEW GOD!” (Romans 1:21). Some people deny God’s Word. Scriptures say that the “invisible” things of God are “clearly seen.” The rich man in Hell begged Abraham to send Lazarus from the dead to warn his five brothers “lest they also come into this place of torment.” Abraham said, “If they will not hear Moses and the prophets, NEITHER WILL THEY BE PERSUADED, THOUGH ONE ROSE FROM THE DEAD” (Luke 16:27-31).

    There are No Excuses Not to Get Saved!

    No excuses! If you go to hell, it will be no one’s fault but YOUR OWN. People are great blame-shifters. Adam and Eve both sinned; Adam blamed Eve, Eve blamed the serpent. This is typical of humans, to shift the blame elsewhere. If we cannot shift the blame, then we try to cover our sins as Cain did. “He that covereth his sins shall not prosper: but whoso confesseth and forsaketh them shall have mercy” (Proverbs 28:13). Cain killed Able and then pretended he was ignorant concerning Abel’s death. On and on we could go. Everyone wants to shift the blame.

    No my friend, you CANNOT blame anyone else for your wrong doing and mistakes. Anytime you point your finger at someone else, there are three of your own fingers pointing back at you. We are all losers without God. Accept who you are and turn to God in faith for salvation. Let me also say, “there are no losers with God.” Admit to God you’re a sinner and ask Him to forgive your sins, realizing that Christ paid for them. Decide to rely upon Jesus Christ as your Savior because of all that He did to pay for your sins. Make that decision now!

    Being saved is the easiest thing in the world but people make it difficult. It’s so simple to be saved. You are a sinner my friend. Because of your sins, you deserve to go to Hell. Jesus died on the cross, was buried and rose again to pay for your sins. If you’ll simply trust in Christ as your Door into heaven, you can be saved… “I AM THE DOOR: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture” (John 10:9). You must simply go to the Lord and BELIEVE on Him. You may call on Jesus Christ in prayer and ask Him to forgive your sins and take you to Heaven when you die.

    The important thing is that you trust upon the Lord in your heart. Decide that you are going to rely upon Christ and nothing else to save you. Not baptism, NOT the pope, NOT good works, NOT religion, NOT merit, NOT sacraments, NOT turning over a new leaf—But trusting Jesus alone for salvation. Becoming a Christian is a win-win situation. There are no losers in God’s family, only winners! Become a Child of God right now, Call on Jesus the best you know how to save you. His righteousness will save you. God bless.

    Table of Contents

    Like

  • Can someone explain the origin of the term ‘Bulling’ in reference to an unnatural sexual act by man on man or man on woman.Similarly can someone explain the term’wicking’ in reference to woman on woman.
    My view is that its all a form on lunacy.Bullers and wickers are all lunatics,
    definitely a mix of homo sapiens and homo erectus. Therefore those condemned to an unnatural life of bulling or wicking are the scraps of nature left behind when H Erectus evolved into H Sapiens.Further this is why you will find among the bullers and wickers some absolutely brilliant minds,a kind of split personality, a left over or remnant of the evolution of
    homo from erectus to sapiens.Let Ross bisex that theory and let GP teach Ross about the History of the Jewish People as written in their book known to us as the bible.After all Ross only took up that book late in life to pretend that he is a scholar of its content whereas GP was at it from early in his life when still a practising MBBS out of Mona.Why! Christopher Codrington linked the two healing professions when he established the College in St John.He didn’t link John Peel with the effort of the college in St John
    He knew the dishonesty associated with the Peel guys,even in those days of yore.
    I once saw on CBCTV that bulling is the act between a stallion and a mare.
    I never could understand the reference to wicking and assume it is so unnatural that there is no word in the lingua franca for it and that it is a bajanism.I know what a wick is.But wicking?

    Like

  • re robert ross | October 29, 2014 at 9:47 AM |
    GP

    Mere repetition as you say with little or no imaginative intellect.
    YOU ARE SO CORRECT
    ROMANS ONE POINTS OUT THAT SO CALLED IMAGINATIVE INTELLECT IS THE PROBLEM THAT IS THE PRECURSOR TO ALL SIN

    AGAIN…….
    Revelation of God derided
    Rejection of God preferred
    Rationalization of God’s Word decided
    Reversal of Truth presented
    Religious perversion accepted
    Reprobate minds adopted
    Ravishing appetites practiced
    Retribution of God delivered

    note that the first point is that upon what everything revolves

    Revelation of God derided
    then one thing leads to another
    HERE IS THE PASSAGE WITH THE ARGUEMENT CLEARLY DEVELOPED BY PAUL18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

    19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

    20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

    21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

    22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

    23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

    24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

    25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

    26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

    27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

    28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

    29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

    30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

    31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

    32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

    Like

  • Gabriel | October 29, 2014 at 9:54 AM |
    Can someone explain the origin of the term ‘Bulling’ in reference to an unnatural sexual act by man on man or man on woman.Similarly can
    ………………………………………………………………………………….
    There are two trains of thought to the word Bulling. One is that it is a Bajan derivative of the word Buggering, (noun :Bugger) . The other is that on the farm when many of the cows were in breed and off limits to the bulls, the bulls resorted to an alternative lifestyle, hence the word ” Bulling”. I never heard the explanation for Wicking, but I suppose it has to do with the Wick and Burner of the old oil lamp. Where the burner is the vagina, and the wick the overgrown clitoritis.
    But I make be talking a load of c***.

    Like

  • Sunshine Sunny Shine

    Wuh Gaw lidee wunna people got me here dyng. I got a fella defining the word buller, hahah oh lawds Beatrice pass me the snuff. He say buller in the context of the bajan vernacular is short for buggery hahaha. Sound like a real scholar too. Then he say Wicker might be derived from the wick of the lamp hahaha. Gaw blimah dah one floor me.

    Boy blue I ain’t really laughing at you but whilst you at it maybe you can help me with derivation of pooch, boxcy, jobby, Ramgeorge, Rampart, Bup Rahsoul, Gaw Blimah and my favourite Gaw lidee.

    Like

  • Sunshine Sunny Shine | October 29, 2014 at 1:42 PM |

    “Boy blue I ain’t really laughing at you but whilst you at it maybe you can help me with derivation of pooch, boxcy, jobby, Ramgeorge, Rampart, Bup Rahsoul, Gaw Blimah and my favourite Gaw lidee.”

    SSS, I can’t agree with you more. BU is a Bajan forum and I used Bajan terms “wicker” and “buller”. Trying to define these KNOWN Bajan terms in the way it’s being done is really bordering on the ridiculous.

    Sheesh…… have you not realised each time those words were stated, they were done so in QUOTATION MARKS, thereby indicating there are not absolute terms?

    SSS, just for more laughs, might I add “gate door”, “reverse back”, “rock stone”, “on it do”, and “o pit in”. hahahahaha…. wuh loss

    Like

  • Sunshine Sunny Shine

    @Artaxerxes

    Hahahahah I rolling up here. “I on it do” hahaahaha and the reverse back piece hahahaha. At least you see the reason I cracking up… Hahahaha wuh this thing funny is france. And oh yeah, wuh France got to do with anything. We Bajans seem to got a serious liking for France. For instance: “wuh de france u gon and do” hahaha or ” You see the france wuh she got on.”

    Wait any we ancestors had it in for France.

    Like

  • How about ..True fact……;repeat dat again……keepin’ noise… who de body is….he live below( or above) the brown shop….bullcow…bulldog..man he is a stinking bulla…she?..ole wicka…anytime or anywhere you hear these words uttered you can be sure you are in good company because its a bajan to de bone whom you hear carrying on that conversation.

    Like

  • Ernest Massiah is a doctor now? Really? Whence Dr. Massiah’s doctorate?

    Like

  • Dr. Massiah’s credentials are important for reasons so obvious they can be taken for granted. Plainly Dr. Massiah does not have a doctorate in medicine.

    Perhaps he has a Ph.D. It is not unreasonable to ask which academic institution conferred a doctorate on Dr. Massiah, and in which field.

    After all, the man is all over the internet as “Dr” Massiah.

    Like

  • I AM GOING TO ASK FOR FIRE TO BE SENT DOWN ON ALL WUNNA WHO LAFFING AT WE HERITAGE
    THEN YOU WILL KNOW WHAT DE FRANCE HAPPENING LOL
    THESE SAYINGS ARE TOO SWEET

    WE LIKE TO SAY TOO “THAT SOUNDS LIKE DUTCH TO ME”
    I WAS TEACHING IN CURACAO AND SOME ONE SPOKE TO ME IN A SHOP AND GUESS WHAT IT SOUNDED LIKE DUTCH TO ME………CAUSE IT WAS DUTCH LOL

    WUNNAH MUST BEG DAVID FUH START A BLOG PUN THESE THINGS FOR NOVEMBER TO CELEBRATE THE PAST AND INDEPENDENCE TO ADD TO THE TWO SWEET BLOGS WE HAD HERE IN 2008

    Like

  • homosexual men seem to suffer more from the pangs of stigmation than lesbians, society seems to give woman an easier pass than men ,lesbians seems also to be more acceptable of there sexuality. it would be of interest to know why the one of the two genders adapt and embrace their sexuality better than the other,

    here is a video of well known celebrities who have no problem with using their pictures as a representation of their sexuality, while on the other hand men seem to remain docile and in the closest,

    . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDDSBJFsN7E

    Like

  • Gabriel

    You are talking through the wrong orifice. You often did. I don’t think ‘doing it longer’ is a criterion for anything very much. It might mean – and probably does – ‘he’s been a prat from birth’. What of you? You have, after all, been around long enough., tottering into dotage with an ever inflating ego, guarding what you once had as you might your master’s goods in the market of ‘feel good’.

    GP

    Still without imaginative intellect. A mere copyist. Will you try to get it into your poor head that at no point did I gainsay what the verses SAY. How could I? What I suggested was that Paul’s witterings were to be taken with caution given his misogyny and (possible) gayness. Is that too difficult for you to understand?

    Do you think Paul faithfully reflects what we know with some certainty were the teachings of Jesus? Or was he on a frolic of his own? Feel free to download.

    I do notice that threats and promises seem to be your line, sin and righteousness, rewards and penalties, and I can see why Paul might appeal to you. Do you think those concepts lie at the heart of ‘religion’? And does this explain why you are so gratuitously rude to those with whom you’re at odds? But then Gabriel says you’ve been a prat for a considerable time. Feel free to download.

    ac

    An issue I raised above, viz the perception of lesbianism being acceptable in a way gayness is not. I suspect if you asked most men whether they’d want a 3some with two lesbians they’d jump at the chance. Switch to a lesbian and a gay man……….mmmm, well……

    Like

  • I suspect if you asked most men whether they’d want a 3some with two lesbians they’d jump at the chance. Switch to a lesbian and a gay man……….mmmm, well……
    …………………………………………………………………………….
    Ya right ! Cause we don’t want to tell the fellow, like the old popular calypso says ” TEK YA MEAT OUT ME RICE!!!”

    Like

  • hi mr ross
    Mere repetition as you say with little or no imaginative intellect.
    YOU ARE SO CORRECT
    ROMANS ONE POINTS OUT THAT SO CALLED IMAGINATIVE INTELLECT IS THE PROBLEM THAT IS THE PRECURSOR TO ALL SIN

    AGAIN…….
    Revelation of God derided
    Rejection of God preferred
    Rationalization of God’s Word decided
    Reversal of Truth presented
    Religious perversion accepted
    Reprobate minds adopted
    Ravishing appetites practiced
    Retribution of God delivered

    note that the first point is that upon what everything revolves

    Revelation of God derided
    then one thing leads to another
    HERE IS THE PASSAGE WITH THE ARGUEMENT CLEARLY DEVELOPED BY PAUL18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

    19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

    20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

    21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

    22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

    23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

    24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

    25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

    26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

    27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

    28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

    29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

    30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

    31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

    32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

    Like

  • @Boy Blue October 29, 2014 at 12:36 PM “.I never heard the explanation for Wicking, but I suppose it has to do with the Wick and Burner of the old oil lamp. Where the burner is the vagina, and the wick the overgrown clitoritis.”

    In old English to bull simply meant to have intercourse, but the meaning of the word developed in Barbados to mean male-male intercourse only.

    And wikker meant simply an old woman, but in Barbados isolated as we are and have been from other Englishes, the word came to mean a woman who has sexual relations with another woman

    Like

  • most men jump at the chance for a two to one concept with lesbians
    1 intriguing
    2 exploring
    3sexual fantasies
    4 a misguide beliefs ,, that there sexual performance would be an automatic transformation for lesbians becoming heterosexual, needless to say these men might have a heart attack trying to prove themselves

    Like

  • GP

    What a joker. OK. No more art. No more science. Only Paul and the mindless plodder GP. YEAH!

    GP would you agree that the creative element in man, along with love, are the nearest we have to ‘godliness’? Or would you say it is the ability to read?

    Like

  • ac

    Your (4) is spot on.

    Like

  • millertheanunnaki

    @ Simple Simon | October 29, 2014 at 10:25 PM |

    Your explanation for the origin of the words “bulling” and “wicking” and their Bajan contextual meaning sounds rather plausible.

    The Bajan dialect is predominantly infused with English, Gaelic (Scottish and Irish) and Welsh sayings and idiomatic expressions with a scattering of West African dialectal relics mainly around food.

    However, I was of the view that the word “wicker” was a corruption of the word ‘Wicca’ referring to so-called witches who live alone or in all-female settings (covens) and who practise the pagan religion called Wicca, what people would call sorcery or witchcraft.

    Like

  • ross
    can you understand this simple outline of a simple Pauline arguement?
    ROMANS 1:18-28

    Revelation of God derided
    Rejection of God preferred
    Rationalization of God’s Word decided
    Reversal of Truth presented
    Religious perversion accepted
    Reprobate minds adopted
    Ravishing appetites practiced
    Retribution of God delivered

    Like

  • Sunshine Sunny Shine

    Hahahahahaah…@millertheanunnaki

    Wuh you people too scholary with these explanations. Please can you explain the origin of boxcy.

    Like

  • GP

    You are pathetic. But sorry…remind me…is that little list to be found in Romans? Did Paul incorporate it into a sin list? I conclude, however, that you account ‘godliness’ as an ability to read. So I guess that ends it……………..”pieces of eight, pieces of eight, pieces of eight, pieces of eight….squawk, squawk” – sorry GP, did you say something?….Don’t shit on your perch there’s a good fella..

    Like

  • @Simple Simon
    In old English to bull simply meant to have intercourse, but the meaning of the word developed in Barbados to mean male-male intercourse only
    +++++++++++
    Show us the Chaucerian evidence, is there any evidence that some variation survived to this day? Is your explanation another “cock and bull” story? I am surprised that “Miller” fell for that bit of speculative etymology.

    Now could you explain the origin of Papal Bulls, or the piece of paper known as a “bull” that we used to put on our kites to make that buzzing sound? How about the Jamaican pastry known as “bulla bread”? How did “bully” originate?

    I am all eyes and ears.

    Like

  • @ Sunshine Sunny Shine the word is “botsie”. Don’t know the origin.

    Like

  • Sunshine Sunny Shine

    @Hants

    Hahahaha than how can you dispute that I spelled it wrong when you are saying there is apparently no known origin. Look the bajan language too sweet. Anybody know this one: ” You musse catch gookma and gookapeckie. You is catching is a head cold”

    Like

  • robert ross | October 30, 2014 at 8:20 AM |
    GP

    You are pathetic. But sorry…remind me…is that little list to be found in Romans? Did Paul incorporate it into a sin list? I conclude, however, that you account ‘godliness’ as an ability to read. So I guess that ends it……………..”pieces of eight, pieces of eight, pieces of eight, pieces of eight….squawk, squawk” – sorry GP, did you say something?….Don’t shit on your perch there’s a good fella..

    you are such a Bible illiterate
    what you call a little list is a beautiful summary or sermon outline on
    ROMANS 1:18-28

    Revelation of God derided
    Rejection of God preferred
    Rationalization of God’s Word decided
    Reversal of Truth presented
    Religious perversion accepted
    Reprobate minds adopted
    Ravishing appetites practiced
    Retribution of God delivered

    read the list and read the passage again
    this passage is one of those that explains the aetiology of sin
    17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

    18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

    19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

    20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

    21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

    22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

    23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

    24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

    25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

    26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

    27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

    28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

    29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

    30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

    31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

    32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

    Like

  • @ Sunshine Sunny Shine,

    I spelt it the way we used to pronounce it 50 years ago.

    ” da girl dey got a big botsie yuh” lol

    Like

  • Apple CEO Tim Cook: ‘I’m Proud To Be Gay’

    Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Apple CEO Tim Cook came out as gay in a powerful essay for Bloomberg’s Businessweek.

    In the essay, published Thursday, Cook said that he has never denied being gay, but has not publicly discussed his sexuality until now: "So let me be clear: I’m proud to be gay, and I consider being gay among the greatest gifts God has given me."

    Read the whole story

    Like

  • RE Hants | October 30, 2014 at 2:43 PM |
    @ Sunshine Sunny Shine,

    I spelt it the way we used to pronounce it 50 years ago.

    ” da girl dey got a big botsie yuh” lol

    HANTS I PERCEIVE THAT YOU ARE A MAN WHO LOVES TO HAVE SOMETHING SOLID TO HOLD ON TO IN A SERIOUS CRISIS!

    Like

  • @ Georgie Porgie ,

    YOUR PERCEPTION IS CORRECT. LOL

    Like

  • hold on tight bro
    to fall off at your age and get a brek up back would be worse dan Archie

    Like

  • During my service days I lived at two barracks ,one in the Rhine Area and the other in Aldershot, and when sending mail to Barbados I had to omit the names of these barracks. They were both name after General Sir Redvers Buller , VC. (pronounced Boo-ler Barracks)

    Like

  • LOL. Not only an idiot parrot – a self-confessed and incorrigible idiot parrot. If you MUST shit on your perch for Christ’s sake wipe your ass.

    Like

  • Life with all its complexities subject us to make judgement calls , But before doing ,should we not take a step back look with great depth while searching seeking understanding and allowing our minds to sift through the the complexities that others live that we donot understand and asked ourselves why?
    Here is a story makes for interesting reading about the daily life of a homosexual trapped in a life of social taboos and wanting to know why

    http://www.irinnews.org/report/100509/paul-gay-rights-campaigner-in-drc-they-said-i-was-the-antichrist

    Like

  • millertheanunnaki

    @ Sargeant | October 30, 2014 at 8:38 AM |
    “Now could you explain the origin of Papal Bulls, or the piece of paper known as a “bull” that we used to put on our kites to make that buzzing sound?”

    The term Papal Bull is associated with the seal or “Bulla” of the Pontiff of Rome. The material making the papal seal had to be boiled (it’s Latin origin being “bullire”).

    I am sure you have heard of the term raging bull. What better term to describe a noisy kite called Jake LaMotta who would have enjoyed a good dish of Jamaican “bull-foot” soup?

    Like

  • For me fellow geriacreics who can only look or lick, these girls could wake the dead. lol

    http://www.nationnews.com/articles/view/calendar-girls-rock/

    Like

  • sorry about the spelling mistake….Geriatrics.

    Dem girls got de ole man head spinnin although duh too young fuh me,

    Like

  • hants
    cover your stumps, go on the front foot and play straight

    Like

  • Georgie Porgie

    You don’t seem to get it? And it is funny how you think that your Religious- worldview is the be all and end all? This is not the way the Hebrew Scriptures conveys it brother. And from the secular point of view: it appears readily apparent that you’re attempting to force your religious convictions down the throats of those persons who aren’t the least concern about your views on Christianity. I am a Christian and have been for the past twenty years. But I know enough to respect the beliefs of others whether they’re: atheist, agnostic, pantheist, secular- humanist, existentialist, Buddhist, Hindus and Muslim etc. And the reason why I have chosen to respect the views of others whether they’re believers or nonbelievers, centers squarely on the fact that when God along with his Son Jesus created the world. In His prescience, God knew that Corrupted man was incapable of a perfect obedience. So what did the Omnipresent, Omnipotent and Omniscient God did? He constructed within man the concept of Free-Will. God endowed Sinful man with the divine principle of Free- Will because He wanted Sinful man through the process of critical analysis, to make his own decisions; to act in accordance of his own judgment sir. So in essence, the entire concept of the Christian- Faith oscillates upon the divine principle of Free- will, or what modern academia would termed today: self –determination, self- realization, self- actualization, intellectual and cognitive freedom and finally, self- perfection.

    Like

  • @ baalam’s ass

    Your words, quote………..”But I know enough to respect the beliefs of others whether they’re: atheist, agnostic, pantheist, secular- humanist, existentialist, Buddhist, Hindus and Muslim etc” Unquote.
    By your very words you prove yourself a total LIAR. I distinctly remember that only a short while ago you were trying to lambaste the LDS church. Where was your RESPECT then for others who believe differntly to you!! Huh? You Liar!!!!!

    Like

  • pieceuhderockyeahright

    It is a thing Bulbadian that there will be three types of people who will risk commenting on this type of topic (i) those who are absolutely against the same sexness practices (ii) those who are for it and (iii) those who, while brought up with homophobic orientations, are saddled with a loving, caring Brokeback Mountain relative.

    So for the most part when many comment here it is with a fear of not voicing one’s opinion too vocally since, just the act of being here, irrespective of wishing to be assigned category (i) just because one posts here one is considered considered category (ii).

    But I wanted to give another perspective, a category (iv) which will call on all aspects of this connundrum for your thoughts and learned consideration.

    At all times the Holy Bible or some other religious instruction comes into focus by those espousing why it is “not right to be same sex oriented”. I am being politically correct.

    When you have a family member who is “that way given” as heterosexual men with gonads it is like a physical slap in your face. “Which side uh de family dat boy/girl get those genes from?”

    Over time, and with exposure to the boy/girl, you cant help but grudgingly love the little fellow and you dont see his … I am searching for a word… variancy, you see him

    With time, and with genuine introspection, you are less disposed to scorn his disposition and you start, some of us, TO TRY TO UNDERSTAND.

    I must say that I do not “understand” it at all BUT I do have some queries that I have formulated over the years.

    For the Holier than Thou brethren and sisteren and those in that crew that rely on Romans without exclusion I would ask you to ponder this.

    Genesis1. 26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

    Yet In Genesis 2. 18 in undisputed chronological order, it says “And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

    Some of the metaphysicists among you will understand the yin and yang rather the concept that both principles, the male and female essence coexisted in the First Adam prior to the “sleep”.

    Essence is not predicated by form so a male principle can be in a female body or a female principle in a male body.

    Fast forward @ today and Chris Back (Australia) who restates that “maleness is actually suppressed femaleness due to the stages of embryonic development”

    In simple biological terms, which Dr. GP might affirm or gainsay, we males are males because the dominant female chromosone, is suppressed!!

    So we have an androgynous creation with a departure point in the Biblical version of Adamic man, possibly coinciding with today’s meiotic divisions as posited by science bring us to a point where UN Human Rights Charters seek to enforce tolerance of “bullers and lesbians” for us homophobic males and (pretend) heterosexuals.

    After a while the grandness of this creation befuddles you and makes you pause a while “and their fond pageant see, just to realise “what fools (we) these mortals be”

    Like

  • de hood | November 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM |

    GLAD TO SEE YOU MAN
    JUST THE OTHER DAY I WAS WONDERING IF THEY HAD PLANTED YOU
    YA GOT TO KEEP FAR FROM BU DESE DAYS CAUSE THE VOLUME OF SHIT BALAAM;S ASS PRODUCING BOUND TO GOT THE EBOLA VIRUS IN IT

    Like

  • millertheanunnaki

    @ pieceuhderockyeahright | November 3, 2014 at 7:49 PM |

    What you have written is the one of the most befuddled explanation of why men and women are neither male nor female but a conundrum of both. Homosexuality is just the extreme points of the Bell curve; both left and right, male and female.
    Bisexuality is a genetic trait that either afflicts or free many humans caught up in their ‘black or white’ cocoon of sexuality.

    Human life is not only a beauty of sexual and social variegation but a colourful reflection of our evolutionary genes. The bonobo philosopher would be proud of you.

    PS: Could you please advise our mutual friend in intellectual drunkenness, Dompey the JA, to stay off the bottle on this one.
    As consideration to his agreement to forego this debate we will be prepared to pay his bar tab woefully in arrears.

    Liked by 1 person

  • @GP
    Hi Doc. I guess that one of these days planting time will arrive but I hope “not yet”.(lol) However I am ready for the event. I have already left instructions with the family how things should be done for the disposal of my mortal remains. I rather prefer to go the route of being put in the big oven at Coral Ridge as apposed to making fertilizer and food for the worms up there, (nothing wrong with a little levity at times, huh?). Also, I will ask that BU be informed of the event of ol’ de hood going to claim a likkle room in his Heavenly Father’s house. Never wanted the mansion; I’ll leave those for people like Froon & Stinking liar (Dopey Domps?) LOL.
    Regards.
    dh.

    Like

  • @Hants | November 1, 2014 at 9:15 AM |

    sorry about the spelling mistake….Geriatrics.

    Dem girls got de ole man head spinnin although duh too young fuh me,


    H, don’t let the age bother you, there is still some hope for us geriatrics because right now there is a 19yr old who trying to set flybait for ol dehood. (LOL) And let me tell you, she is a great looking specimen of our Father’s creation!

    Like

  • de Hood

    Behave!

    Lol

    Like

  • @ David

    Just a likkle levity, Dave, never hurt anyone; but thanks anyway for the chastisement! LOL.

    Like

  • @ De Hood, ” trying to set flybait for ol dehood.”

    Sometimes it is enough to know that “you could if you wanted to” but your maturity prevailed and you didn’t. lol

    Like

  • @Hants

    Has this been your experience?

    Like

  • Yes David but I have learned to resist temptation in my old age.

    Like

  • De Hood

    If you intend to bring a charge against me, you ought to have given it verbatim or at the least paraphrase it brother. The only comment I do recall making in reference to Church of the Latter Saints, was its discriminatory practices against African Americans in the 1800s.

    Like

  • @ dompey the dopey
    Ok!!!!!!!! I fully understand your defense! You are now trying to claim you were too full of “de spirits” (what’s your fav? Mount Gay/Cocpspur?) to even remember what you wrote. You remind me of those politicians we have around here in Bim, they have become so good at LYING that they now believe the lies that they tell is the truth!! Carry on smartly fella.

    Like

  • It’s about time that Jamaica stops condemning and attacking those who choose to live a gay/bi-sexual life. Jamaica is increasingly viewed as a pariah state by those who find her attitudes on gays as both ignorant and intolerable.

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/may/05/bisexual-jamaica-asylum-seeker-facing-imminent-deportation-from-uk

    Like

  • Surely Britain isn’t the closest safe country to Jamaica though.

    Like

Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s