Submitted by William Skinner
Peter Wickham political scientist ‘...gets almost all his polls right and has only missed one big one here...’
Peter Wickham ‘…gets almost all his polls right and has only missed one big one here…’

At some point, an individual has to look at life and determine whether it is going the direction he or she would want it to. Countries must do the same. As I survey the political scene and pay rapt attention to the rapidly decaying socio – political environment, I am forced to ask myself if Barbadians are really serious about the direction the country is taking.

It is obvious to all objective citizens that the country is in turmoil as it transitions from the quaint little village to the world stage. A stage for which it failed to prepare. Hal Austin, a regular contributor to this blog, got it right sometime ago, when he opined, that we were perhaps fooled by the praise that we constantly heaped upon ourselves and that which others gave us. We were told by the world’s top diplomat that we were “punching above our weight”. We bestowed the title great economist on former Prime Minister Owen Arthur. We declared Errol Barrow the father of the nation. We have thrown about the word brilliant with great carelessness. For example, Leader of the Opposition Mia Mottley has been accused of being brilliant! We are a people who declared we had the best of everything: the best education system; the best roads; the best hospital; the best schools and of course a literacy rate of 97% percent.

The irony of the situation is that all of the above is very true when we look at other Caribbean islands. Anybody visiting our sister islands would have to agree that Barbados does have the best schools in terms of construction; the best roads although ours are in a state of disrepair in many cases; the best hospital of any that is used by the entire public, never mind we cannot get the accident and emergency department to function properly and of course we are rather literate. We have Cave Hill producing graduates on par with any of our neighbours; never mind employers say that some of our graduates cannot understand basic arithmetic and English. So what am I complaining or criticizing? Well, we have all these positives and yet we seem very determined to turn them all into negatives. Almost forgot, we have the best public transportation system although we can never make it profitable and our rolling stock is hitting the road with bumpers and fenders missing. Of course the failure to maintain the buses ensures that about 30 or 40per cent are either parked waiting for parts or have been forced to early vehicle graves by bad driving habits.

I now come to our incredible democracy. Every five or so years, we enjoy three weeks of hectic campaigning. And yes, once again, we can brag that it is probably the most incident free elections anywhere in the world. Nobody gets killed. I think a few decades back, Muhammad Nasser got cut with a bottle throwing thing but I don’t think that it ever made court. No problem. Gone are the days of the half bottle of rum and a few soda/eclipse biscuits with our treasured corn beef. We have transitioned to giving the voters: lap tops, iPods, top end cell phones and Sir Grantley’s image looms large in hands and pockets. According to our dithering, Charlie Chaplin (Silent Movies) Prime Minister, Mr. Freundel Stewart, he actually saw money passing during the last elections. Imagine the Prime Minister witnessing crimes in broad daylight and not one report to the police. Not one arrest. What a crime free democracy!

No more under forties debating the pros and cons of independence; no more exceptional grass roots politicians such as: Lionel Weeks, and Lloyd Smith. Not a Mencea Cox or Ronald Map. No Neville Boxills in site. Oh no, those guys use to throw the occasional jab but talk about policies and were close to their constituents. Even a very well educated fellow like Frederick “sleepy “Smith was down to earth. And according to a young man, whom I have great respect for, Mr.Peter Wickham, that particular breed has no place in his modern Barbados political make up. As far as he is concerned Hamilton Lashley was the last of that ilk. Sad thing, Wickham may be right!

Well, Wickham represents the new breed, armed with a university education and a profession grounded in political science and polling. He is a highly sought after political scientist. He gets almost all his polls right and has only missed one big one here- the very last one when Charlie Chaplin overcame all the fancy sound effects! Maybe if there were more of the above mentioned grassroots politicians, his polls would be more accurate because people back then were a bit more genuine.Oops…

Allow me to close with our esteemed labor movement. In the current debacle regarding the severing of 3000 according to the DLP or soon to be at least 10,000 workers according to the BLP, the unions find themselves out to sea. They are suggesting policies after the so-called Minister of Finance; Mr. Chris Sinkler has enunciated the policy on the floor of the house. I say so –called because Mr. David Estwick is apparently acting as Minister of Finance today (Thursday 12th. Feb 2014) when he presents his own personal views to cabinet to rescue the economy. Just like the unions, he is presenting policies to stop retrenchment of workers AFTER the retrenchment has commenced. Brilliant!

So the workers are left to another regular contributor of this blog, Caswell Franklyn, to defend them while their president runs up cell phone bills in the thousands. Now I don’t know much about wages in our public sector but I seriously believe that $6000 could have kept one of those workers on the pay roll for quite a few weeks or even six months. But the NUPW does not have that kind of strike fund. Modern unions have: Excessive Use of Cell Phones by Presidents Funds! I digress. The workers voice is now Caswell. Now I have quoted, to support my little contribution, two regular contributors to this blog: Caswell Franklyn and Hal Austin. Note I have not attempted to big up anybody from the mainstream press because the problem we have, is that mainstream Barbados, has crashed like mainstream Wall Street and that caused all the confusion.

Stay way from mainstream Barbados thinking and we may just survive this crisis. And a great shout out to Pachamama. Thanks for BU. Sometimes a nation (newspaper) has to take a look at itself.

247 responses to “Barbados at the Crossroads”


  1. @ Lawson
    ….LOL ….so what now?!? ….Bushie is being accused of secretly having the ability to execute proper English (and other languages) when it suites his purpose?
    Ha Ha …..when was it written that a poor bushman, who benefitted from free education and who has accumulate stacks of papers as a result, has to be constrained – either to grammatical perfection, or to sweet-as-shiite Bajan slang…?

    @ Ross
    What custom what?!?
    You think people here are fools?….or perhaps you are one…??!
    Some of the most ridiculous “customs” that exists would easily fail any simple morality test….

    Like the generally accepted idea of the superiority of a particular race, when… If you are familiar with Bushie’s long established explanation, this particular race is quite simply a result of a genetic defect….

    Like the generally accepted idea that God is some kind of “Trinity”…which is utter nonsense, but taken as gospel

    Like the idea that this world will just go on for ever – an OBVIOUS fallacy, since we live on a clearly TEMPORARY planet…as a rudimentary understanding of entropy easily shows…

    …and like the custom of electing 30 useless morons and putting them in charge of our national assets …and expecting ongoing success

    Custom is simply what most brass bowls will accept….and as you must know, brass bowls will accept ANY shiite….


  2. Bush Tea

    I am beginning to think you are really rather stupid or totally without integrity. I pointed out, and it is incontrovertible, that consensual activity may indeed result in codes of understanding. It is a FORM of making regulations though their substantive value depends, I quite agree, on other factors.

    Thus the Chinese regard it as the grossest insult to put outdoor shoes on a table. We would simply say it was a very dirty thing to do. The Chinese ‘rule’ has not been legislated by God or anyone else. Neither has our response. To some African tribes, and the Jews, of course, circumcision is required to retain the purity of the ‘collection’. We might reject that and say simply that it’s a cleaner thing to do. But if we don’t, are we then disobeying God? In short, morality has a relativistic dimension. It is not all-or-nothing.

    Custom lies at the root of primitive legal regulation. Constitutional conventions, for example, though not really ‘primitive’, being ‘conventions’ are not something issued by a political superior. They are regulating understandings.

    Consensual understandings also lie at the root of any acceptable moral Code. The supposed activity of God does not explain how moral rules change. Nor does alleged Divine edict explain (a) why atheists observe moral rules or (b) the extent to which otherwise ‘God-fearing’ people condemn them.

    Nor does it explain the value which people give to those rules, else, for example, we would never have had divorce and all the other things which bug some church people. It applies to theology. Indeed, those who have written on this subject in recent years are clear that you can have a godless morality.

    Now just as I’m sure, despite your pillar of salt story, that in the Rogers case you have a special interest, I am also sure that you can’t really be such a dickhead as you suggest.

    But whether you are or not, I find it offensive that you insult everyone who disagrees with you. YOU at any rate are NOT God almighty; nor have you the right to legislate who shall do what, where, and why.

    But then, yes, you are a self-confessed bully and an anti-person. You are anti-gay; anti-women; anti-government; anti-humility; anti-courtesy; and, yes, ante-deluvian and so I suppose simply to be pitied.

    But I forgive you yet again.


  3. As I keep saying religion and politics which have both morphed into cultural practices succeeded in totally destroying a earth that was meant to be natural and free of man made shit, the people’s minds have been polluted, brainwashed and programmed with total SHIT.

    I read a book on 15th century practices in Europe between the churches, roman and anglican, the ‘royals’ from different countries whether it was france, spain, england, germany, whatever suited their sick purposes and kept them wealthy and in control of people and their minds in that era, and I not surprised that is was/is all SHIT, up until this very day.


  4. So now BT you claim to speak with many tongues interesting. There is no such thing as free education, it comes with the responsibility to enlighten people with the experience and the wisdom you have gained from this free benefit. So I am trying to figure out what courses you were given…Biology… white folk are a defective gene…..Human resource management…….I want 30 of you useless morons to do what I want. Science …the world will end tomorrow….or the next day or…. the one after that. Sometimes getting something for free isn’t all its cracked up to be.
    .David when you said unique was that a good thing????


  5. @ Well Well

    In response to your critique of religion and politics let me address to question to you: where would human civilization be without creation of language? I suppose human language is a man made creation right? Friend correct me if you think my ego seems to overshadow my limited intellect. But, it is only through the collective exercise of the intellect and the imagination that man has been able to forged the kind of civilization we’re witnessing today. Now, I well know that you’re cognizant of the fact that prior to the scientific and technological breakthroughs we’re witnessing today, life expectancy wasn’t as it is today.


  6. @ Well Well

    So you see Well Well, man’s intervention into the natural order of things has some meaningful and rewarding benefits?

  7. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ robert ross | February 21, 2014 at 9:21 AM |

    R R, I must say you gave it to the Bush rat good. He is deserving of that intellectual ‘cut-ass’ which the sadistic bully might just enjoy.

    But I really like the use of the adjective “ante-deluvian” to perfectly carbon-date the moral dinosaur.
    Now how the heck would a painter of a caveman living in southern France some 30,000 years ago know about the “Bushy’ burning bush story of some sky god’s instructions to a mythical Egyptian which were plagiarized from the Book of the Dead?


  8. Anytime wunna lawyer jokers RR and Miller think that Bushie is indisposed due to travel or other commitments – wunna does suddenly get brave and bright….
    Don’t you think that there are other intelligent people reading this who can think?
    LOL…It is quite obvious that Bushie’s faith sticks into wunna craws and pisseth wunna off…

    Wunna can intimidate the faithful with a lotta shiite talk – sounding intelligent – but smelling like something to flush…. BUT can’t handle Bushie’s whacker or the lotta salt the bushman does throw in wunna wounds.

    Look jokers… In response to the donkey’s suggestion that moral laws need not emanate from a spiritual source – disputing what been stated by Mark Fenty, Bushie merely explained that, unless such a higher authority exists, AND established such laws, then ANY. OTHER so-called moral laws are of no more worth than Miller, Ross and Jack Donkey combined…i.e… can’t buy a sweet bread in Baxters Road…

    Any intelligent person can see that there will ALWAYS be persons who will buck any such “customs” and that “right” and “wrong” then becomes a matter of who has the MIGHT to enforce THEIR customs.

    Shiite man, any third form student can grasp that…. It has NOTHING to do with burning bushes, or BBE or Yahweh….. Just LOGIC…

    With respect to Ross….
    Bushie does not insult everyone who disagrees with him….only pompous jackasses promoting themselves as “learned” and them actualy typing asinine statements like…
    ++++++++
    I pointed out, and it is incontrovertible, that consensual activity may indeed result in codes of understanding. It is a FORM of making regulations though their substantive value depends, I quite agree, on other factors.
    +++++++++
    Have you EVER read anything so meaningless and asinine? See why Bushie would insult YOU now…?
    ….Incontrovertible ….MAY indeed result….value DEPENDS on other factors?….shiite man…If indeed you are a lawyer, then the damn public should be protected from your ignorance Mr. Ross…. Hopefully you are a corporate lawyer working in your own family firm….

    If there were no moral laws inspired and established by a supreme being, then we would live in a moral jungle where might is right and everything goes…..
    …fortunately we don’t,…and GOD is…..and wunna just plain dumb! LOL


  9. Bush Tea

    As you would say: ‘You remain an offensive toad emanating nasty liquids’, but I note you have now switched ground from ‘God’ to ‘spiritual source’.

    If you actually read what is written, as distinct from reading what you want to read, though that seems to be your MV, you will see that way above I said that where there is love, which is your ‘spiritual source’, all else falls into place. You will also see that I said that if you want to say that the love in the human heart is ‘God’ I would not object.

    As for your objection to the passage you quote, since you don’t actually say what the objection is, I conclude that your brain simply can’t grasp it’s meaning. Your inability to say ‘I don’t understand’, like the inability to say ‘please’ or ‘thankyou’, simply demonstrates (a) the absence of intellectual integrity, and (b) your want of moral sense since your intention to ridicule at another’s expense is rooted in the ignorance which you are not prepared to admit..

    I also note that you are not happy unless we accept the premise, which you yourself make a moral imperative, that ‘might is right’ and that THAT is the ONLY way rules originate, evolve and work. I accept that a bully like you would think in that way.

    “Sounding intelligent”, “intimidate”, “other intelligent people who can think”, “any intelligent person can see”, “should be protected from your ignorance”, “any third year student can grasp that”, “asinine”, “promoting themselves as learned”……..you poor fella. Were you beaten as a child? Does your inferiority complex and ‘God-li-ness’ arise from the fear of imminent extinction?

    Now: what of

    General Assembly resolutions?

    The rule that a will is invalid unless it has two witnesses.?

    Jesus’ exhortation ‘”love one another”?

    The moral value of the orders backed by threats of a nasty old man in the sky – say ‘all black babies, who are black because they’re dirty, shall be thrown into the Tiber at three months or I’ll give you into slavery’? Consider the story of Isaac in Gen 22.

    ‘God made you gay as a punishment for your insubordination’? (St Paul)

    Crimes committed in the name of religion (God)?

    Belief in hell and eternal damnation as a precondition of understanding it is wrong to kill one anther?

    ‘Truth’ as itself a moral question? eg ‘living a lie’

    The moral value of doing something because it makes us feel good – the satisfaction in servile compliance?

    Crafting a moral rule independently of God as demonstrating God’s triumph since it shows we’ve grown up and are using the freedom he gave us?

    How we know that an order is of divine origin?

    ‘God’s Word is in the Bible’?

    Problems of interpretation? Eg the word ‘abomination’ – lying with a man and having sex with a menstruating woman. Or again ‘aduttery’ as (a) a prohibition of extra-marital sex or (b) a betrayal of trust or promise.

    Gayness, human rights, gay marriage?

    Superstition and rational thought, mechanics and intuition?

    The distinction between ‘rule’ and enforcement?

    Well, BT, it’s late and I’ll leave it there. Still got another letter to write. But I hope you see, at the least, that the trouble I’ve taken is in itself a mark of respect and, of course, of a forgiveness which arises not from the ability to count, nor from command, but rather from the free flowering of the human heart. Get it?


  10. BT….Chuckle….must agree with your thinking except for BBE.


  11. LOL @ Vincent
    …don’t fret about that small difference….you will come around…trust Bushie…

    @ Ross
    In rebuttal to your now extended collection of bull shit, Bushie would only admonish you to read it again….or better yet, find someone with class 5 level comprehension skills to do it for you.

    You are now sounding like “minus Zoe”
    Bushie don’t make it a habit to intercourse with intellectual children….but today is looking like a slow day for whacking…so Bushie got some time… 🙂

    Like 15 year old debaters, Ross and his sidekick Miller keep evading the SIMPLE point made by Fenty that moral laws CANNOT be established by man / people / custom / consensus.

    Cuh shiite! What is difficult to grasp about that?

    ..so now, – minding Jack Donkey, Ross talking bout “if love in people’s Heart is God”…and bout “if there is consensus…”

    This man retarded?!!

    Love in WHICH people’s heart?…he .mean the white people that feel it is their inherent right to own every shiite that exists?
    …he mean the mighty USA who reserve the right to kill everyone who they deem a terrorist?
    ….he mean the UN agencies whose main mission is to make the whole world homosexual? …..
    …or does he mean.Jackie D’s love for nitpicking grammar and insulting bloggers who are simply making a genuine contribution?

    …and what the hell is “consensus”? …is that what happens down Cattlewash on weekends when decisions are made for Barbadians?

    UNLESS MORAL LAWS ARE MADE AND SANCTIONED BY A HIGHER AUTHORITY, THEN THEY ARE NOT WORTH SHIT…AND EFFECTIVELY WE HAVE NO MORAL LAWS.

    Shiite man…even ac can probably grasp that OBVIOUS argument.


  12. Res Ipsa loquitur. You are simply saying the same thing over and over. Your brain is simply incapable of any form of sophisticated communication – so the effort to explore with you is pointless. Moreover, for sheer nastiness you are unsurpassed. SWMBO – a WOMAN BT – got you right at the outset – “a fckn idiot”. Ah – but that’s women for you! Forgive.

    PS In your penultimate paragraph you have shifted your ground yet again. I do, of course, grasp the argument. It is, as you say, very simple – so simple, as you say, that a 5 year old would get it. I regard it as inconclusive as a 10 year old would understand – ie (since you have difficulty with language) – ‘yes you have a point but there’s more to it than that’. Get it?

    Now go your way sunshine.


  13. Ross
    Don’t you know that the only way to teach an ass, …is to do and say the same thing over and over until the jackass gets it?

    Intelligent people can deduce for themselves but it takes licks and repetition to get through to a donkey.

    You get it now you say…?

    …anything else you need explained?


  14. Yes: is your arrogance a family characteristic would you say?


  15. Arrogance / assertiveness / self-confidence……it is all in the perspective of the little person on the other side.

  16. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ robert ross | February 22, 2014 at 8:55 AM |
    “Res Ipsa loquitur.”

    Clearly confirmed by the following straight from the Bushman’s mouth:
    “UNLESS MORAL LAWS ARE MADE AND SANCTIONED BY A HIGHER AUTHORITY, THEN THEY ARE NOT WORTH SHIT…AND EFFECTIVELY WE HAVE NO MORAL LAWS.”

    Is this “HIGHER AUTHORITY” his BUP that is the only option available to save poor morally corrupt and financially broke Barbados? Or is it his BBE living in the skies who will single out Barbados for his Leviticus type moral laws?

    What about adding the following moral instruction?
    Thou shall not borrow money to waste on ‘immoral’ living or beg from the Chinese who eat swine and anything that crawls or moves in total disobedience to the divers laws laid down in BBE’s operating manual on morality.


  17. Question on where are on two Caribbean matters promised solemnly to happen by Estwick and trini PM Kamla. The natural gas pipeline Estwick swore back in 2010/2011 would start in 2013 and the ferry service the Trini PM said was imminent back in 2011/2012. People must appreciate Trinidad will never deliver their gas under such an arrangement to any Caribbean island its just not on. Trinidad already sells the Caribbean oil and gas at higher rates than it sells the mighty USA. What pipeline what. As far as the ferry service that’s no no a mere red herring for Kamla when Redjet briefly looked to be a threat to CAL.


  18. @ Miller
    Trust you to take Ross’s folly to a new nadir….

    @ Waiting
    Amen,
    Politicians mostly speak because they have engagements to fulfill. They don’t really expect us to take them seriously. For the most part, they themselves have no idea what they are talking about….

    What natural gas what?!. ….when a simple flying fish (that they consider junk) has been a problem for decades…

    The ferry is a bit more likely however….to bring more Trini manufactured stuff over …to be consumed by Bajans and paid for with yet more money borrowed from the UAE…..


  19. LOL

    Good. So the issue IS multi-dimensional. Apply this to so-called ‘moral rules’.

    But on the substantive question – I guess you’re saying ‘yes’.

  20. millertheanunnaki Avatar

    @ Waiting | February 22, 2014 at 9:42 AM |
    “Question on where are on two Caribbean matters promised solemnly to happen by Estwick and trini PM Kamla. The natural gas pipeline Estwick swore back in 2010/2011 would start in 2013 and the ferry service the Trini PM”
    But ‘wait’, the fella Estwick has not even left the front bench yet and you guys want to eat him alive. Imagine if he were to cross over to political Jericho what would ensue. Maybe his transfiguration, after his recent epiphany on how to save the Bajan economy from the destructive hands of Stinkliar & Co.

    Are you crediting Estwick with the sole authorship of the DLP flagship programme as outlined in the 2013 books of lies and deceit sold to the electorate? Here is a snippet of what is contained therein:-

    A renewable energy revolution in Barbados will be the centrepiece of the economic strategy of a new Democratic Labour Party Administration.

    THE NEW DLP ADMINISTRATION WILL (inter alia) :
    “Explore with Trinidad and Tobago the construction of a natural gas pipeline linking Trinidad and Tobago to Barbados….”

    What next are you going to blame the poor chap for? The laying off of people because he failed to let Cabinet know prior to the arrival of the IMF of his $ 5 billion dollar deal to save Barbados from economic Armageddon?


  21. Being dyslexic …..I am quite interested in BT;s ……..BUP


  22. @ Bush Tea,

    Generally Brother BT as long as Mark Fenty says it, I tend to consider it a moot exercise in babble but I would wish to give a perspective on this which is based on the GOOD BOOK, The Bible.

    The premise posited lies in the statement ““UNLESS MORAL LAWS ARE MADE AND SANCTIONED BY A HIGHER AUTHORITY, THEN THEY ARE NOT WORTH SHIT…AND EFFECTIVELY WE HAVE NO MORAL LAWS.”

    John 10:16 King James version states as speech of the Son of God “And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.”

    If i, least of the apostles, and foremost backslider at the Hall of those Blessed in the Blood of the Lamb, were to take some interpretive license I might be correct to say the following

    If Jesus the Christ is saying that there are people of other nations? climes? races? religions? who are His and that He will also gather them
    That these other folds may perforce include peoples like Bush Men of the Kalahari who may never have heard of GOD but have lived lives using a moral compass such that HE would gather them into HIS Harvest?
    And if such a posit as item one and two presented above have some modicum of truth, does this not suggest that while these men and women lived in systems which “were not made nor did not have sanction by higher authority” then what MY CHRIST says negates Fenty’s point about them not have any moral law, does it not?

    I just think of things simply though and my rationale was birthed in something quite simple i.e. if Henderson Bovine, Alternating Current or Fenty propose it then something gots to be wrong with it.

    Now mind you Brother BT, I believe in GOD, who i have like the Wind, not seen, but m convinced exists. But such belief is based on my personal experience which CANNOT be conveyed to any other soul by proxy.

    But i understand a little bit about the logic behind the Venn diagrams that the granchildren does be talking bout and exclusive and mutually exclusive sets, and such is embodied in the Living Word.

    In a sentence, it is possible to be a man of principles and morals and be either lacking in the knowledge of GOD, or someone who claims not to believe in GOD.

    Now Brother BT if, if David[BU] let slip this info bout who dis blogger is to the Washed in the Blood Crew, it all over and all dis highfalluting talk heah bout “sanction and morals’ I gine get place right in de back pews for de sinners. Cyan get read out causing de madam she is one uh de saints and elders so dat deah is me “you may pass go and collect 200 pounds”


  23. @ Pieceuhderock

    LOL @ your position on Fenty, ac et al…..however one needs to be careful, even a broken clock is correct twice a day…. 🙂

    On the matter of the moot of “moral laws”….meaning guidelines that can be universally taken of what is right and what is wrong for human beings…. The ONLY point that Bushie was making to those juniors, was that there is NO WAY that human beings – as we know them – can be depended on to establish any such laws that can be meaningful.

    Quite simply, human beings are generally brass bowls….and it is beyond brass bowls to conceptualize universally morality. The “stand your ground” license to kill blacks in Florida is a good case in point…

    Now on to your further position on “…people of other nations, climes, races, religions, who are His and that He will also gather them”
    +++++++++++++
    This is a totally unrelated issue.

    Basically, as the BBE project called “Human life on earth” goes, the experience of the Jews would be what modern day consultants would call a PILOT PROJECT.
    All the quotation that you used is saying is, whereas the initial project was focused on these Jews, the intent is actually for the project to be universal in coverage.

    The facts are that NO SOCIETY, and probably PARTICULARLY the Jews- have lived lives “using a moral compass”…. Indeed, by Bushie’s measure, the Jews are some of the biggest brass bowls in existence…..imagine after experiencing their Nazi experience, they are able to inflict EVEN worse treatment on Palestinians….?

    So even a lost jungle tribe who eat their own children would probably be standing in the same “moral compass” as these pilot project brass bowls….

    Since you are a man that actually understand things, Bushie will also give you a hint of the ACTUAL moral Laws that have been prescribed by the higher authority of BBE, for mankind….

    There are three basic guidelines…..
    1 – Love and respect yourself and learn to appreciate your TRUE potential value as a human being.

    2 – Love your neighbor equally as you love yourself…and also appreciate their true potential value as a human being

    3 – Love and appreciate the Supreme Beings, intelligence and love (BBE) that conceptualized and created the whole project called “Human life on Earth”

    ……and by far the most important of these is number 3, …..but you should note that number 3 is IMPOSSIBLE without number 2, (how can you claim to love a Being you cannot see, when you clearly do not love your neighbor?) …and number 2 is impossible without number 1.(how do you love your neighbor if you do not love yourself?)

    Shiite man Pieceuhderock…., we can’t even balance our little shiite budget here on this rock after 60 years of high level education….you think brass bowls could come up with moral laws of such calibre..? 🙂


  24. @Bushie

    You are saying that the intelligence we associate with the design of the universe must extend to moral law making?


  25. Have these “MORALS LAWS been inclusive of other Nations and RELIGIONS or only applicable to christian dogma and belives,,, ,,,, it is almost an exercise in futility to use ChRISTIAN THEOLOGY AND TEACHINGS to be guidelines for universal moral laws, further more there is no such thing as “universal Moral LAWS ……foolishness..


  26. @ Bush Tea

    I do not believe that man can or will come up with anything of that calibre what i am saying is that, in the billions of us that have represented the human race (to quote Fenty) that some must have (i) Loved and respected self and appreciated the value of sentience (ii) Loved and respected neighbour and fellow sentient being as they respected self and (iii) mindful that there may not have been a category of Supreme Being en vogue for such (i) an individual (ii) village/tribe/other collective at that time, can we not extrapolate that they might still be entitled to the Benevolence of Such Supreme Being since, consistent with” ignorance of the Law not being an excuse, having achieved 2 out of the 3 basic guidelines, in the absence of the 3rd, would they not be entitled to the redemption that Jesus the Christ speaks of?

    It would seem punitive that, for lack of knowledge of, like the inhabitants of Tasmania, or the Red Indians of North America, that if their Manitou was not the Real BBE, that the BBE would, cognisant of said persons observing all things spiritual, reward them justly


  27. @ man Pieceuhderock….try not to fall into the trap of the likes of ac and Fenty please… This in no little petty game of count the sheeple, ….simple minds tend to think of BBE in human terms….. LOL what a joke… Tantamount to one of Lowdown’s old goats (and here Bushie is NOT pinpointing ac 🙂 ) questioning Lowdown’s right to do as he wish with his herd…..
    LOL hear “old goat” …..’who the hell Lowdown think he is to put me on this pasture instead of the one by the hill?’
    …or
    ‘ it cannot be fair for Lowdown to decide to select my cousin for goat stew last Sunday….’

    Goats are goats and shepherds are shepherds…..

    WRT your tribe dweller who satisfies the three conditions outlined….they DO exists….and the conditions under which they do – ARE universal……(Which, by the way, is THE REASON why the ability to grasp this particular message is completely independent of traditional intellect- BY DESIGN- otherwise, brainiacs like Miller, Zoe and Ross would enjoy an unfair advantage over bushmen 🙂 )

    @ ac
    Pray tell us what is uniquely “Christain” about the three laws outlined….and where would they not be appropriately applicable?

    @ David
    It requires SOME intelligence – at a level that have not yet been demonstrated by mankind….


  28. @Bushie

    And this is the point, what is unknown or cannot be understood will be repelled by those who only want to see what is before them as reality.


  29. The upcoming celebrations for 375 th anniversary of our parliament,should be deferred until the year, 2020, as the last six years, and counting, should be deemed null and void.


  30. first u have to define morality built on universal law equitably among people and races.for e;g love,,,,,,,,,,,,,love in its purest form can be defined as being unselfishness not necessarily of benefit to one self but should be beneficial for instance to those who have done you harm forgiving the guy who murder your love by extension of mercy in casess where a death sentence is reduced to time serve or maybe getting him out of jail ….but is morality use in that instance no,,,why not,,,is it moral to love then why can’t loved be the catalyst for such a redemption.. is it not built on morality.. so you used love as a reference as a moral law but can it not be used to justify injustices which transfers to forgiveness for your fellowman or is there a built in moral code or limit to how much love should be given and to whom ,,,,,when it comes to morality setting a trap bet wen what is real and factual can be an uphill climb as it all relates to whose ox is being gourde ,…..so where and how do we as a people have the right or authority to put a stamp on morality and call it law and by whose standards. any way.


  31. @ David
    “….what is unknown or cannot be understood will be repelled by those who only want to see what is before them as reality.”
    +++++++
    ……exactly….to their own destruction.
    ….Case in point ac above…. Lol …Ha Ha …oh shirt!!!


  32. where have i rejected love as a moral duty note i did not say moral law..furthermore by extension. u bush tea have set up society for failure by using love as a moral law a law with built in principles not even u can adhere to. laws are there to protect and guide ,which are different from coded laws built on morality which can infringed on the rights of others,,,,.


  33. uh think BT going to rebutt ..DON’T THINK SO case closed,,,,,,,have a nice day bushie,,,,,be careful which direction u swing the bush whacker next time,,cause you might whacked BBE that wouldn’t be good ,


  34. To be honest with you ac, Bushie cannot make head or tail of that lotta shiite that you just write…. So Bushie will take his own advice…
    …..and HUSH.


  35. BT…..
    I presume that BBE in his code that only you understand,outlined these “moral”laws.
    Every society from time immemorial has fashioned codes of behaviour in order for the continued existence of the tribe for a given point of time.Where we have always gone off course is when we attempt to apply what was intended to deal with a situation 5000yrs ago to todays situation which cannot be the same.


  36. o/k/ bt u are dismissed ….but in summary u or no one have a right to dictate morality formed on christian ideology or theologies ,,,


  37. Vincent
    Who said that only Bushie understands? ANYONE who can read – can grasp this in the bible – and in practically all existing religious manuals….
    Perhaps you can suggest which of these LAWS are any less relevant now – than they were 2000 years ago…

    Codes of behavior fashioned by societies cannot be considered to be moral laws. Such codes are just that….apartheid was such a code, as was the plantocracies that fashioned our slave history….you think that those felons were unaware that they were breaking MORAL LAWS?

    Bushie told you already Vincent….because YOU don’t understand or agree with something does NOT make it wrong …or nonsense… LOL


  38. wait bush tea wuh happened the cat cut u tongue or did the missis bush whacked u ,, ur lack of tolerance can make a sane person mad like u ..imagine having roles and regulations enforced on everyliving human being under the guise of morality,,,wuh even bbe got more tolerance than u,,,,,,,god let king solomon do as he god dam please………for a short period,,,wuh de man could party,,,,,but U the bush whacker always ready to attack,,u one miserable sob,,,,,,,dont forget to take uh med…opps i forget it is pass u bedtime,,,,then remember to put u depends on,,,, law no 1,,,,,,it is against the law of bbe to piss on ones wife,,,,,,,,


  39. BT…
    Your reference of the Bible and other religious manuals substantiates my point…..a number of clueless individuals like yourself decided to unravel the mysteries of the the world and the universe by using the tools that were at hand(like tea leaves) and came up with such nonsense as the earth being flat,human sacrifices,enslavement&mutilation of women,homo-phobia,etc,etc…..the list is quite extensive and you are living example of that warped thinking….enjoy….lol


  40. @William Skinner

    You have made reference to the fact that the black entrepreneur in Barbados is being marginalized by corporate greed and the instruments of government that allows it to flourished. Question: have you taken this message to your representative on behalf of the black entrepreneurs? Or have you already organized a movement in the public to bring awareness to this unfortunate injustice? When people are suffering there is a pressing need for real solutions to their problems and not the haft- baked rhetoric that comes across this blog like hot cake. William you ought to be an active participant and not the customary armed chair warrior. Now,this situation has obviously reached crisis point (if we’re to believe what you’re telling us) because people livelihood are being threaten, so therefore, the time has come where there is a pressing need for real solutions and not the daily rhetoric which infused this blog continually.


  41. William, I have already established the Armed Chair Warrior Club. And would you believe that David have gotten the high honors of being it first member? Your membership is pending review William.


  42. Will David be sitting comfortably in that chair, or will be be strapped down ,blindfolded and waiting on a 10,000 volt shot.


  43. @ Vincent
    “….and you are living example of that warped thinking….enjoy….lol”
    +++++++++++
    Boss…you are so clueless that there may well be some commercial value in you after all…
    Wuh…If Bushie is a living example as you suggest….then perhaps everyone should follow the bushman quickly…..LOL….cause all of the “things” that wunna fellows seem to be aspiring after….Bushie have….

    You sure it was people like Bushie who called the world to be flat…?

    …..or those who jump to illogical conclusions?… For example, in response to your assertion that BUSHIE ALONE has these “strange ideas” about universal moral laws, you were referenced to some commonly available books where the EXACT SAME thing is detailed….
    …and you conclude that this led clueless people like BT to ‘unravelling mysteries’, “tea leaves”, “enslavement” and “flat worlds…..”
    …you was at school with Alvin or wuh….?


  44. BT….BT…Cudear….yuh could have come better than that….what piffle..lol

    Try and mek up yuh mine yuh is a Cawmerian or not???….and as one I totally disagree with everything that Alvin promulgates,as do the Central boys….lol…..but I will defend his right to do it..


  45. LOL @ Vincent
    “..piffle”? …touché..
    ….we see that you have no defense …LOL Ha Ha
    Ya could have just said so…

  46. Daniel Robert Mayers Avatar
    Daniel Robert Mayers

    I is now an ole man an when I rite on de bu blog i is it are dat almos knowbody can unnerstan me ennymore becoz is is a ole man an de elderz in my day orl rote like dis so you shud tekma seeryus coz dis are how we did rote in de olden daze.

    I is standin behyn baffy an de fambly with miller wuholoss nuh dat miller wid he kkk

  47. The Creepy Lil Waxy Rapy Dimwit wid He Jokes ‘bout Rape (DCLWDJR) Avatar
    The Creepy Lil Waxy Rapy Dimwit wid He Jokes ‘bout Rape (DCLWDJR)

    “Bushie merely explained that, unless such a higher authority exists, AND established such laws, then ANY. OTHER so-called moral laws are of no more worth than Miller, Ross and Jack Donkey combined…i.e… can’t buy a sweet bread in Baxters Road…”

    Wow. Just how stupid does a person have to be?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading