Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Anthony Davis
Senator Kerryann Ifill
Senator Kerryann Ifill, president of the Council For The Disabled

It is simple theft; the stealing of precious space –– parking spots reserved for the handicapped or disabled of our community. And the more we talk about it, the worse it seems to get.

Advocates for the disabled –– not least among them the president of the Council For The Disabled, Senator Kerryann Ifill herself –– say fines for the able-bodied who illegally park in the spots for the handicapped should be twice or triple what they are now. A few have recommended instead a mandatory seven days in jail – Barbados Today

First of all let me congratulate “Barbados Today” for a well-written editorial. It is despicable for hard-backed men and women to park in spots reserved for the handicapped. I have noticed that mainly males park in such spots. Females tend to desist from breaking this law, as they do with most of our laws!

Of all the reasons for so doing, laziness takes first place. He who dares ask the perpetrators why they are parking in that spot will get a mouthful of the vilest invectives he/she has ever heard. However, this should be ignored, because it only shows a lack of vocabulary. I think that parking in such spots can be seen as violating the human rights of the handicapped, and such cases should be dealt with accordingly.

I would suggest a mandatory three-month stay as a guest of Her Majesty at her beautiful hotel in Dodds. I would also add one week of community service in a high-traffic location like Oistins, where the culprits will be tagged with “I parked in a handicapped parking spot”, with writing large enough to be seen from a way off.

Unfortunately the “love thy neighbour as yourself” went through the window on 30 November, 1966, because many do not know what Independence really is. Politicians are trying to blame the churches, but they still play a pivotal role in our country. It was the politicians who took religion out of the schools in their blind eagerness to follow Britain and the EU countries.

The old people always say, ” Follow pattern kill Cadogan!”. We follow too much instead of leading!

Right now our country needs a new crop of leaders, but there is not one to be seen – either in the BLP or the DLP camp. It is: “SIX OF ONE AND HALF A DOZEN OF THE OTHER.” You have Government ministers giving pretty speeches, but are not living up to what they preach, and there are Opposition members doing the same. So, to whom should the younger generation look up?

You have a Government minister banning teachers’ unions from school premises. One must be very wary when someone advocates banning unions, because that is a very slippery slope and can lead to anarchy and the muzzling of the press. Another is talking about the “rot” in Jamaica, and thinks that nothing is wrong with that. Our Minister of Finance can make disparaging remarks about the leader of the Opposition, and the Prime Minister backs him up for not apologising!

This Government has driven so much fear into the youth of this country that they are afraid of demonstrating against something that is to their disadvantage. In not one of these has the relevant minister shown any love for his neighbour. On the contrary, the venom with which the words were uttered leaves much to be desired!

Then again the members of this Government are in stand-your-ground mode, which means that they do not have to make apologies for anything as they are infallible. There are too many godfathers/godmothers in our country, and also too much nepotism. These things have nothing whatsoever to do with loving your neighbour. In fact, they tend to bring about the opposite, because those who should really get the jobs don’t.That is why there so many square pegs in round holes in Barbados – and this pervades throughout our society, whether in the public or private sector.

But, as you said in your editorial, there are the untouchable big-ups, and so we can wait till the cows come home, and nothing will change in that respect. This attitude towards the disabled in our society is the epitome of callousness, and should be countered with the same hard-heartedness that the perpetrators show towards our disabled sisters and brothers.

They give no quarter, and none should be given them!

This is NOT  the kind of situation where one should turn the other cheek. When we get laws in this country whereby one is convicted no matter what his/her status is, then this country will be ready for First World status.

NOT BEFORE!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

65 responses to “Disrespecting the Disabled”


  1. It is very disturbing to see on a daily basis strong able bodied MEN parking in spots reserved for the disabled. PriceSmart is a prime example of this where Taxi drivers in particular are guilty of this.
    I tackled one last week and he got particularly “pissed off” when I challenged him and became abusive. I told that I was sorry to have confronted him as I now realized that his disability was not visible.

    I know that that remark went over his head.


  2. Have we got laws in place to fine or jail fit persons who park in parking spaces reserved for the disabled? As far as I know , those laws are in the same promised statute book , as those pertaining to Indiscriminate Burning of Refuse , Drunk Driving, Excessive Noise and Obnoxious Emissions from motor vehicles. The present situation is not a command, but a request. Until we make hard and fast laws pertaining to these items, all we or the police a can do when we see others not complying, is to beg/request that they show a some consideration towards others.


  3. IF the authorities refuse to treat with these kinds of matters seriously what do you expect from the citizenry? Hell, we can’t even stop the killing of women and the molesting of our children by adults charged with our trust.


  4. Sorry – and NO disrespect for anyone – I think this post is over-the -top.

    Perhaps someone will articulate what a ‘disabled person’ is for the purposes of a parking space.


  5. @Ross

    Don’t you think a good place to start the definition is to regard those who are normal as not qualifying for disabled parking privileges? Sometime it is about using commonsense.


  6. Disabled can be defined as both physical and intellectually disabled Ross.


  7. LOL @ Ross
    …you can always trust a lawyer to fcuk up any simple plan with trivia.
    Wunna would be shocked to know that it is likely such a question that would have stumped our 30 parliamentarians and delayed any such law.
    …of course the answer is simply that “DISABLED” means any vehicle with the authorized disable parking sticker attached to the windshield 🙂


  8. Oh dear….physical/mental….normal/abnormal…..they take us nowhere.

    OK….
    Case 1

    I injured my leg playing football and since I am heavily bandaged I can only walk with a stick.

    Case 2

    I am heavily arthritic and walking is painful. I have to hold my wife’s arm to walk but I can drive.

    Case 3

    I am 14. I just fell over and my knee is bleeding.

    Case 4 (to please Mark Fenty who is trying to be a smart ass)

    I have a very low IQ. There is nothing obviously wrong with me and my walking ability is not impaired .

    Case 5

    I am 99yo.

    Case 6

    I am six weeks out from having my second hip replacement operation but can drive.

    Case 7

    I suffer from very low blood pressure so that if I have to walk too far I get dizzy and may fall over.

    In other words, my very dear FRIENDS, do you have to be blind like Kerryann to qualify, or one legged – in other words the very obvious physical things?

    Now I am quite sure that Kerryann would reject totally the idea (which seemingly David wants to push) that she is “abnormal” – and, indeed, my understanding is that the Council for the Disabled would say that merely because you have those rather obvious physical conditions does not mean that so far as possible you should not be treated like everyone else and most certainly should not be discriminated against (especially for employment purposes). In other words, the ‘official’ disabled line is: ‘we don’t want your pity; we are normal people like you are’. And I agree totally with that.

    But I’ll come back to this.


  9. Bush Tea

    That is one of the things I was coming back to.


  10. @Ross

    If you are temporarily incapacitated go to the office of the disabled and procure a sticker. There is a procedure to follow to get compliant.


  11. David

    Are you really a mindless bureaucrat?

    I fell over playing football this afternoon and can hardly walk. I want to buy provisions from Carlton. Before I can use s disabled space I must go to the ministry.

    Give me a break fella.


  12. Rotfl @ RR
    Man since you neutered Amused you have become the most amusing contributor on BU…. 🙂

    Skippa….. If you fell over playing football and “can hardly walk” you are INJURED not handicapped. Best to haul ya tail to a doctor…..and look for some golf clubs – or some other sissy sport to play.

    If you DONT have a sticker you DONT have a park …..comprendez? 🙂


  13. Ross, anything below an IQ of 70 is considered intellectually disabled. But, those persons at the higher end of the spectrum are quite capable of operating motorcars and things of that nature.


  14. @Bushie

    You can’t make this stuff up to borrow TB’s words.

    No wonder…


  15. Being disabled goes far beyond the physical aspect of the subject. The mental/ intellectual aspect of the disability, we often seem to ignore but it is just as impotant as the physical aspect. A person who suffers a ( TBI ) Traumatic Brain Injury such as a cerebrovascular accident like a Stoke etc, can lose some of their cognitive function and end up being labeled as Intellectually – Disabled.


  16. All right!!!
    OK Mark……
    Report to the office tomorrow and YOU can have a damn sticker.. ……..OK?
    Steupssss


  17. OK – now stickers

    There are two sorts of parking spaces, public and private.

    To park in a public car park there is normally a fee and so, clearly, if you wish to avoid payment or to claim the right to a designated place or both you would need a sticker as corroboration of the claim to be disabled or some other form of corroboration contingent on the ‘house rules’ of the car park. It would be open in the event of breach to stipulate a fine. I’ve never had to apply for a sticker and so I guess you would have to request a GP to provide evidence that you are, in fact, disabled and the concept of that would vary with the circumstances as the GP perceived them to be and as the public authority will accept. Certainly, in some of the cases I mentioned above stickers are carried even though the situation is not what David calls ‘abnormal’ which is why I listed them in the way I did.

    Privately owned car parks raise different considerations. The site owner would doubtless be entitled to put up a notice to the effect that vehicles using designated places but not carrying a sticker may be clamped or removed – but I doubt that they would. As Colonel says or implies above there are no recognized criminal offences committed where someone not ‘disabled’ parks in a designated place in a privately owned car park. Parking is thus, as he suggests, a matter of ‘goodwill’ and I cannot imagine for a moment that the site owner would object if, in some of the cases I mentioned, cars were parked in designated places. I am thinking, particularly, of BT’s remarks about people with injuries who need to seek medical treatment.

    That this is correct seems to me inevitable given the number of designated parking places in some supermarkets. At Carlton there are, perhaps, 8-9 places opposite the main entrance. Unless you have a wheel-chair convention inside it is difficult to see how all those places are necessary UNLESS they are intended for a wide variety of people with the sort of problems I mentioned who might have difficulty carrying food merchandise very far and whether they have stickers or not. In other words, you don’t have to be registered as disabled in order to receive the benefit of the space.

    As for the idea of ‘theft’ of the parking place – err…..well, I don’t think that one holds as I’ll say later.

    One thing though. As I said at the beginning, I think this post is over-the-top. That does NOT MEAN I am unsympathetic to the disabled in any way whatsoever. Nor am I suggesting that we should not exercise every degree of consideration possible in matters of this kind. Oh yes, I am still waiting to see whether David will modify his concept of a disabled person as an ‘abnormal’ person.


  18. Bush Tea, I really enjoy your excusable display of puerility. It shows quite clearly, the principles, values, and convictions that governs your thought process.


  19. Thanks Mark….
    The fact that you would draw conclusions from Bushie’s puerility speaks volumes… The bushman was merely doing as one is instructed “when in Rome”…

    …and BTW Bushie thoroughly enjoys your insurmountable ability to sound rational while saying absolutely nothing, and being about as logical as ac….
    Ya too sweet!!


  20. It is politically incorrect to use the word Handicapped in association with the people who are physically and intellectually disabled.


  21. Bush Tea, one ought to look a great deal at oneself, before thinking of condemning an other. And this idea of marginalizing others in an effort to aggrandized oneself, speaks to a mentality that is lacking in self – esteem obviously.


  22. Bush Tea, it also seems as though you’re gifted with an egotistical imagination that at times leads you into a fault sense of reality, because you’re obviously overestimating your intellect as you seek to underestimate mine.


  23. @Ross Are you for real?

    Carlton having 8 spaces reserve for disabled persons means just that, it is not open to your interpretation.


  24. David

    Why do you have a closed mind about so many things?


  25. Now answer the abnormality point.


  26. Mark Fenty

    Your stroke person……Case 8


  27. @Anthony Davis “It was the politicians who took religion out of the schools in their blind eagerness to follow Britain and the EU countries.”

    But religion hasn’t been taken out of the schools. There is religion (to wit Christianity) in every school every day in Barbados. Sometime several times a day.


  28. @Anthony Davis “You have a Government minister banning teachers’ unions from school premises.”

    Not true. No Government minister has the authority nor the power to ban teacher’s unions from school premises.


  29. Dear Robert Ross: Can you tell me how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?


  30. SS

    As many as a ‘schoolman’ says…hence SS


  31. Oh since SS has started me off – you can’t have theft of a space which you neither own, possess nor control. It is not “property belonging to another”.


  32. Nor is there an intention to deprive – who? – permanently


  33. Nor is there an assumption of the rights of an owner.


  34. Nor would there be dishonesty if, as in my cases above, the person who parked without a permit believed a supermarket owner would consent if he knew all the circumstances.


  35. OK SS…there’s FOUR ANGELS. Why don’t you now use your massive intellect and try and find more or less angels or, for that matter, shoot mine off the pinhead.

    Oh and David…but no never mind.


  36. “Not true. No Government minister has the authority nor the power to ban teacher’s unions from school premises.”

    Mr Jones has not refuted or denied the reports in the papers attributing the remarks of instructing Principals not to allow Unions on the school premises so I have to assume that they are true because the combative Minister would not have allowed the reports to go unchallenged. So are you saying then that the Minister is so dumb that he does not know the extent of his authority.


  37. “It is simple theft; the stealing of precious space –– parking spots reserved for the handicapped or disabled of our community. And the more we talk about it, the worse it seems to get.”

    I do a lot of shopping and I hardly see disabled or handicapped shopping far less unlike metropolitan countries using mobile mechanisms which would require parking facility to move around; but knowing how quick it is for us Bajans to embrace and jump on bandwagons even those irrelevant to our own circumstances, I avoid for the sake of peace not the disabled using even those spaces designated for the disabled which I can categorically say are never used. The spaces in the Guardian general car park for example.


  38. Whether the disabled parking spaces are used is not the point. There is a moral obligation to make the space available. Have we become so selfish to want to ignore this group in our planning? A check with the Disabled Council will show we have people who qualify for the status of ‘disabled ‘. We have become an insensitive society when we need to debate the pros and cons of this issue.


  39. David

    Balance is ABSOLUTELY right. But so are you. Interestingly, however, it is RR who advocates compassion to all types of ‘challenged’ people NOT you.

    It is NOT a question of debating the pros and cons or being insensitive as you suggest. That is simply a device for you to demonstrate on your chest what you regard as your social concern as if to say that it is exclusive to you and others do not share that concern. Yet you regard the disabled as ‘abnormal’ – and I don’t think that Kerryann – who can see better than most with sight – would thank you for it.

    But one other thing. You cannot DICTATE what people should think or say. Your talk of the ‘BU household’, as if to say it represents the view of kocher people on this site, is simply misplaced in a DEMOCRACY. Or don’t you subscribe to that ‘western’ concept? Don’t put up posts if you don’t want them ‘debated’ in the broad sense – and when you do DON’T tell us what to think or belittle those who do not agree with you. Help us to work it out for ourselves by all means – but not with a gun at our heads, else you are really no better than those you regularly criticize.


  40. @Ross

    Any opportunity to obfuscate. Carry on smartly.


  41. The smart answer David is not very smart I’m afraid. But then, as usual, you make my case for me. Thankyou.


  42. very interesting however i do agree with davids point. also on ross point of ones right to express their opinins without feeling a sense of threat i would absolutely agree………The disabled like all citizens do pay taxes .however as a those persons with a disavatange against the normalties which are easily accessible to the able bodied i see absolutely no wrong no harm done in a society extending a helping hand towards them . the pointless excuses exhibited by comments are selfserving an tasteless


  43. I have just spoken with Andrew Bynoe.

    He confirms my distinction between public and private car parks and is adamant that though parking in the Carlton spaces is often abused they are there on compassionate grounds for those who cannot walk easily very far. He described the idea that you have to have a displayed permit in his complex as “stupid” and included those with recent injuries.

    So sorry to tell ya, boys……seems I was right.


  44. AC

    No one so far as I recollect on this post has made excuses for the able bodied taking spaces intended for those who are ‘challenged’ – certainly not me.


  45. “Whether the disabled parking spaces are used is not the point”

    Yes, that is exactly the point especially as it relates to the limited provision of parking space for one reason or another to accommodate abled persons having to waste valuable time looking for parking to conduct regular business when there is unused space hardly or ever used lying idle. Isn’t there a moral obligation for adequate parking to be provide for all first and then select groups disabled or otherwise afterwards? These self-serving platitudes in my view pale into insignificance when juxtaposed with the despicable treatment that is known to be meted out to elderly relatives perhaps even by some of those who hypocritically shed crocodile tears over an issue because it has now become fashionable to do so.
    What I find immoral is the First Schedule of the Immigration Act Cap 190 which among other things deem ‘ dumb, blind, physically handicapped” persons prohibited persons


  46. Balance

    Your last para….BEAUTIFUL


  47. Oh sorry balance

    Your point about elderly relatives is well taken and, indeed, has been a special concern of Kerryann and the Council for the Disabled. Ditto the treatment of those who are mentally challenged in a family setting.

    In focusing attention exclusively on permits and spaces we are, at least in my view, merely demonstrating our Pharisaism, our small and narrow mindedness, and I think that, in essence, that is what you are trying to say. It is the difference between law and equity, and those ‘bleeding hearts’ like David represent law I’m afraid since what they bleed, on analysis, is only water. So now, David, where is the chalice?


  48. @ Ross
    It is clear why Bushie is warming to you… (But don’t get no funny ideas…)
    Unlike Amused, who presents a COMPLETELY FALSE picture of what a typical lawyer represents by standing for transparency, truth, fairness and honesty, YOU truly depict the classic character of the lawyer…..
    Shiite man…. Bushie is fully impressed at how you have been able to take a simple matter of reserving a special parking space that is designed to accommodate someone who may be using a wheelchair, crutch or similar aid, into a complex legal quagmire that will require extensive study, consultations – and possible hearings, before a white paper is drawn up outlining the 1000 or so acceptable excuses to park in such a spot.

    We will then have the result of numerous security guards putting lashes in those whose excuses failed to win the guard’s favour (and as you would guess, Mr Andrew Bynoe will not be on hand to resolve the matter)….but of course – then we will need lawyers to sort THAT out too …..won’t we…?

    You is a boss Ross…in the same league as David of BU is, in keeping a Blog HOT HOT HOT

    …much respect from the bushman 🙂


  49. ROSS isuspect all the examples which you gave as excuses. nevertheless it goes back to your” tacky” and tasetless efforts in the attack of law for the disable.


  50. BT

    Lol…why thankyou…err I think….err

    It has occurred to me that David may be as he is precisely to keep the post ‘hot’…and I wouldn’t blame him for that.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading