← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Caswell Franklyn, Head of Unity Workers Union

Whenever Matthew Farley is out of the news for any extended period, he stage manages a set of circumstances to catapult himself into the headlines. His latest headline grabbing stunt was the suspension of 265 students ostensibly for uniform infringements. Nine chances out of ten, when mass suspensions of school children hit the news; you can be assured that this little megalomaniac, Matthew Farley is the protagonist taking the bows.

One must wonder why is it that of all the 21 government secondary schools principals, only Farley resorts to these extreme tactics. Could it be that he is looking to make a name for himself at the expense of these children abusing them in the process?

Farley is right about one thing: rules must be obeyed. Unfortunately, too often those in authority behave as though rules apply to everyone else. Rules are not only in place for students, there are rules to regulate the conduct of principals as well. And since this principal is such a stickler for adherence to the rules that govern others, you would expect that he follows the letter and spirit of the rules that apply to him zealously. After the news of the suspensions broke, he was a caller on Brass Tacks discussing the issue. That along with his regular appearances as a moderator leaves me to wonder if he is complying with the Code of Conduct and Ethics for the Public Service, particularly paragraph 24 which states:

24. Officers shall not

(a) be editors of any newspaper or directly or indirectly take part in the management of newspapers;

(b) contribute to any newspapers in Barbados or elsewhere on questions that can properly be called political or administrative, but may furnish articles upon subjects of general interest;

(c) make a statement to the media or allow themselves to be interviewed on questions of public policy or on matters affecting the defence, military resources or diplomatic relations of Barbados with the prior approval of the Minister concerned;

(d) make public or communicate to the media or cause to be made public or to be communicated to the media or to unauthorized persons, any documents, papers or information which may come into their possession in their official capacity or make private copies of those documents of papers;

(e) give broadcast talks or engage in any discussion that is being broadcast on any subject that may properly be regarded as of a political or administrative nature, without the prior permission of the Minister concerned; or

(f) disclose or produce in evidence any official document of a confidential character in any court of law without obtaining the previous permission of the Minister.

If Farley wants to enforce the rules, it is only reasonable to expect that he leads by example following the rules that are laid down for him. For his sake, I sincerely hope that he has obtained permission from the Minister for his constant appearances on radio where he discusses matters that seem to conflict with his role as a civil servant otherwise he would not only be a megalomaniac but a hypocrite as well.

By the way, it is within my certain knowledge that the Ministry of Education mandated changing hem lines from two inches above the knee to two inches below because two little girls got pregnant for teachers. Rather than punish the teachers, the Ministry blamed the little girls for putting temptation in the teachers’ way and ordered the hem lines of all girls down.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

170 responses to “Matthew Farley the Megalomaniac”

  1. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ David | October 21, 2012 at 9:59 AM |

    Yes. And anything regarding the economy coming from the governor is suspect because of the political agenda of this governor.

    If I were to choose a statistic to rely on I would err on the side of the BSS.

    BTW, why is the governor overseas to impress the same rating agencies he said in July were a bunch of jokers and not to be relied on to assess Barbados’ economic performance.
    Is this the kind of weathercock professional we can trust?


  2. Hi David!
    If too much education is a dangerous thing then conversely ignorance is bliss.
    So there is no hope for those for whom education is a life long quest that drives every tangible advance that is built upon it and on which we depend even for survival.
    IMHO when education stops life stagnates or even goes backwards.
    The people who produce and advance every human effort are using the basic tools to push beyond – they are learning as they go, education is happening throughout life well beyond what is gained sat in a classroom before a teacher or professor.
    I see it every day, I experience it every day, I like many others have to learn new things every day – that’s education and it never stops.
    That’s education as the wider world knows it.
    Check these guys out for tangible evidence that their achievements are based on continuing education and open minds.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/exclusive-pioneering-scientists-turn-fresh-air-into-petrol-in-massive-boost-in-fight-against-energy-crisis-8217382.html


  3. Interesting Nation Big Interview with Mathew Farley.

  4. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Caswell:

    “24. Officers shall not
    (e) give broadcast talks or engage in any discussion that is being broadcast on any subject that may properly be regarded as of a political or administrative nature, without the prior permission of the Minister concerned;….”

    Here we have a bunch load of double standards being preached on this thread.

    Right now Matthew Farley is in total breach of the above code of rule of conduct by being on the VOB Sunday discussion programme.
    He is making pronouncements and expressing agreement with criticisms of the previous administration’s policy on the youth.

    If Matthew is to be taken seriously with his Gestapo enforcement of polices, rules and regulations then he needs to adhere stringently to the rules that govern his behaviour as a public servant.

    Ask BAF, he is on right now arguing my point!


  5. @Sid

    The point about using the cliche is that many of our intellectuals are book smart but obviously lack the softer skills which make one rounded.


  6. Miller

    By now you would realise that our society is completely hypocritical. Farley knows that he can do whatever he likes in the full knowledge that he would be protected by his political friends. We know that he was seeking the nomination for St. John on a DLP ticket so there is no guessing about his politics.

    Farley is living proof that rules are only made for some. It is time that he should be disciplined.


  7. Here is an extract from Jeff Cumberbatch’s column in today’s Advocate:


    Of uniforms, school rules and common sense

    In my days in the lower school, the rules called for laced brown walking shoes, calf-length khaki socks and, of course, the not-yet-ubiquitous epaulettes. Our parents, understandably, tried their best to comply, even though few of them might have understood the concept of walking shoes to be other than shoes that you walked, as opposed to ran, in. The rules in this regard were generally complied with, even though there were, too, the inevitable exceptions. A letter giving reasons for the non-compliance would usually accompany flagrant violations, but this did not become a public issue since, as was equally notorious, a breach of common sense was deemed a breach of the school rules.

    Hence, no one sought to measure the length of a boy’s khaki shorts so as to ascertain if it varied a few centimetres from a stipulated length; and, years later, in the upper school, when the nearly fifty shades of grey trousers varied from the obscenely tight to the ridiculously baggy, there was not much ado. I do not recall a single press article about the school or its headmaster in my seven years there.

    Of course now we live in different times from the 1970’s and, for some educators, fame does not emanate from quiet achievement so much as from publicity and news coverage. Thus, the news this week that over 250 students had been suspended from one school for infractions of the dress code did not give cause for undue surprise. Our obsession with form over substance is already well known in other spheres of activity and one need only mention the word “discipline” in regard to the justification of any action to be assured of popular support.

    Still, one wonders whether removal from the school environment is a punishment proportionate to the offence of non-compliance with the dress code or whether it might have been more advisable for other extra-curricular privileges to be withdrawn in cases of flagrant unexplained breach.

    According to the principal, letters had been dispatched to parents, warning of impending action. I could well imagine the reaction of my parents to such an official letter back in the day. But we are in a different era now. A breach of common sense is no longer a breach of any rule.

    http://www.barbadosadvocate.com/newsitem.asp?more=columnists&NewsID=27383

    Here is the Editorial on the same subject:

    http://www.barbadosadvocate.com/newsitem.asp?more=editorial&NewsID=27384


  8. In the Nation’s Big Interview with Farley today he flatly denies that the picture presented in the Nation of a group of girls dressed in uniforms of Garrison School are not the same uniforms which offended the rules. Now, what does this say about the reporting by the Nation?


  9. @David | October 21, 2012 at 7:01 AM |
    “The saddest thing here is that children in society will sit on the periphery and observe how the adults are pulling against authority.”

    Let’s give children some credit. I’m sure not all or most children will think that adults who have criticize Farley disciplinary actions view it as pulling against him, an authoritative figure. They know that the authority is not always right or always wrong.

    There are issues that involve high ranking officials such as this one that need to be talk about openly. In my opinion it doesn’t help a situation when people hold back their feelings and pretend that whatever took place was ok, using the excuse that they did not want their children to think they are against authority, or because it could reflect poorly on the individual, especially anyone of high rank.

    When there is a need to pull against anyone in authority, it should be done without hesitation but respectfully.

  10. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @David | October 21, 2012 at 12:50 PM |

    So when are we going to get such prominent attention paid to the thousands of uninsured and unlicensed vehicles on our roads?

    When are we going to pressure the Commissioner of Police and the Licensing Authority to remove such menace and danger to our peace of mind from off our roads?

    Why focus on one school with just over 200 deviants when we have in excess of 30,000 blatant violators of our traffic laws travelling the roads just waiting for their next victim?

    Children learn what they live! Why this Gestapo like approach to the children of your God and sweet Jesus who kindly encouraged the little children to come unto him:
    Extract from “Children Learn What They Live” by Dorothy Law Nolte
    “ If children live with sharing, they learn generosity.
    If children live with honesty, they learn truthfulness.
    If children live with fairness, they learn justice.
    If children live with kindness and consideration, they learn respect.
    If children live with security, they learn to have faith in themselves
    and in those about them.…”


  11. @Miller

    If you read what Farley is reported to have said in the Big Interview he is the lone ranger enforcing the dress code. He was deliberate to remind Barbadians that all the Principals agreed to enforce the policy arising from the last time he suspended 213 students.

    So dear miller if we go by Farley the miscreants ate more than 200 and why can’t we enforce other aspects of discipline all at the same time?


  12. and what is amazing is the parents attitude one father concern was that the child would be at home without proper supervision wuh dawg he should have thought about that after one year of sending the boy to school in baggy pants fo. another parent concern was for her losing time from work nothing said absolutely about correcting or discipline the child for breaking the school rules

  13. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ David | October 21, 2012 at 1:55 PM |

    Those children aka miscreants are just easy targets. Yes go ahead and make examples out of them. Hopefully, some would go on to learn the rules of the big lying game like Sinckler and Lashley who wants become a multimillionaire in less than 5 years on a ministerial salary.

    Why not target some of the big fish in the small morality pond for censure and discipline like the lawyers most of whom attended other “older schools” where deviant behaviour is never allowed to fall below the knees of moral uniform measurement.


  14. I just spoke to a friend of mine who suggested that we are over analysing this situation. He reminded me that the Alexandra crisis came to the fore when there was a vacancy for the post of Chief Education Officer and Broomes was a candidate. He then pointed out that there is a vacancy for Principal of the Community College and wondered if Farley was a candidate. If he were that would explain much. Is he?


  15. miller

    Those children aka miscreants are just easy targets. Yes go ahead and make examples out of them. Hopefully, some would go on to learn the rules of the big lying game like Sinckler and Lashley who wants become a multimillionaire in less than 5 years on a ministerial salary.

    ac@miller

    How convienant not to add the RT HON to the list of big time millionaires in a job where one is called to be of service to the people.

  16. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ ac | October 21, 2012 at 2:35 PM |
    “How convienant not to add the RT HON to the list of big time millionaires in a job where one is called to be of service to the people.”

    Your eternal friend in Hell OSA never pretended to be morally self-righteous except when he ousted MIA. The man admitted to his “demons”.

    What about Stuart, Lashley and Sinckliar? Or are we waiting until the demons-possessed Leroy Parris on his deathbed spill the beans and in a moment of exorcism puke up the DLP sins as confession to avoid a similar fate to David(??)?


  17. In the Nation’s Big Interview with Farley today he flatly denies that the picture presented in the Nation of a group of girls dressed in uniforms of Garrison School are not the same uniforms which offended the rules.

    David, before you try to chastise the Nation you must be absolutely sure if Farley’s statement is 100% correct. Even if the Nation reporters drilled the parents regarding the picture of children in uniforms are the same uniforms that caused the principal to send home these students, you will get a resounding yes. In this case, you cannot blame the Nation.


  18. Miller

    I ask that fella to mention the problem on the VOB program today and the response as I understand it is that Mathew Farley believes that a call in forum is TOO SMALL to deal with the issue of breach of conduct/ethics by a public servent wrt speaking to public policy w/o Ministerial approval …. HA HA HA. MURDA … COME FAH YAH WORLD NOW. The man is a fraud ….!

    In fact when further challenged to find out the cost to tax payers for the delivering of this policy document the response was to skirt the issue and address the question as one of the price tag attached to implementation. So Mathew Farley also did not think that it was important for tax payers to know how mush they are paying to have these research papers drawn up … What foolishness …! FRAUD!


  19. I wish a greater effort was made by Bajans to think about issues in a broader sense.

    How in heaven’s name can school children’s uniforms dominate the newspapers and now we have a war brewing between Farley and the HC headmaster.

    Unfreakin believable.

    Jeff Cumberbatch offered a reasoned opinion.Read it.

    One more thing. School age children should be wearing walking shoes. Dress shoes are no good for your feet.
    I have not worn dress shoes for about 20 years. I wear walking and running shoes that are all black for work.


  20. @millertheanunnaki,

    Can we expect proof of your allegations on a political platform? Will you Wikyleek to MIA an OWEN?

  21. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ BAFBFP | October 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM |

    And to think this same FRAUD is a person many on this blog look up to as a paragon of virtue.
    Typical case of: ‘Do as I say and NOT as I do’. Not leadership by example only by force and threats. Just the kind of character Bushie admires.

    This is so hypocritical enough as to make those Catholic Church paedophile priests look like Santa Claus hiding behind the garrison at night looking for who is who in their “pick-up’ vehicles.


  22. Having read Farley’s interview it seems to me that there is a problem with the way Principals relate to each other.

    The adult heads of our secondary schools could not get together to deal with this issue?

    First Jeff Broomes. Now Matthew Farley. Which principal will be on the front page next?

    These bastions of leadership need to get some leadership training.

    Did I ever tell you why black children get more licks than red or white children?
    lemme see eff wunna cuh figguh dah out.

  23. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Hants | October 21, 2012 at 3:18 PM |
    “Did I ever tell you why black children get more licks than red or white children?”

    Ask Harry callihan, he is the resident expert on ‘negrology’.

    Is it because the licks don’t show up on their thick black skin like other pale skins?
    Is it because the teachers or those doing the licking of white children would either end up being sued for millions or with a frigging bullet in their dense stupid heads?


  24. OK David,
    I get your drift.
    Reminds me of 2 days after arriving in the UK and visiting the local Hamradio club where I had a conversation with a lad not quite 13 years old.

    It ended with my impression that the kid knew almost as much as I did age 18 1/2 only to get another surprise when the kid was talking to a member in his early 40’s and I realised – “Heck, the kid knows more than I do”.

    That was a very rude wake up call and a humbling experience.

    At age 70 1/2+ I realise that the more you know the more you realise how little you know even when PhD’s and professors have to consult you.

    Learning’s not done until the lights go out and they ready me for the pine box.


  25. @millertheanunnaki,

    Close.

    I am curious as to who called the Nation.


  26. Hants

    I can only guess but I would be surprise if it weren’t Farley.


  27. @Caswell

    In the interview with Farley today he indicated he did not call the reporters, wouldn’t the Nation be in the best place to challenge?

  28. Retired Teacher Avatar

    @ Caswell .
    Mathew Farley’s ” attack ” on his Fellow principal AND FELLOW BAPPSS MEMBER Winston Chrichlow provides further justification for the instituting of the Commission Of inquiry into the Alexandra School by the Hon. Prime Minister . I am almost certain , given the wide mandate to make recommendations for the improved functioning of these schools , the Commissioner will have something to recommend for the conduct of PRINCIPALS . I am sure too that any amendment to the Education Act will have a provision to reign in this modern day group of ” dictators” in the education system . It has become clear to me that they engage themselves in a daily exercise of fighting for turf ; laying down stakes ; and establishing what Mr Broomes describes as ” positional responsibility ” .
    I should like to suggest to Mr Farley that if at any time a principal of a school finds it necessary to suspend for FIVE DAYS ( the maximum period of suspension allowable AFTER INFORMING THE BOARD AND THE PARENTS BY LETTER under the Education Act is TEN DAYS ) more than 25 % of the students , FOR WHATEVER REASON,
    in one fell swoop, that action is a clear indication that the administration in that school has broken down . That action cannot be justified on the enforcement of discipline ALONE . There must be a rigid observance of rules and regulations within the school environment , but there is the other consideration of inflicting punishment incrementally before finally bringing down the sword of Damocles . This approach will also help to TEACH VALUES to those very students .
    The article ” HEAD HITS OUT ” published in today’s Sunday Sun also raises a point of great interest . It is there reported that ” Farley threw out a challenge to Chrichlow and all other Principals of secondary schools in Barbados to carry out an all school inspection first thing on Monday morning …….” my 265 ( suspensions ) will look like a picnic ” . This open confrontation by a BAPPSS member to his fellow members is , at the least very startling ; can this body really survive ? Or more , fundamentally , can this body justify its validity as a principal’s trade union . I believe Caswell that you are well qualified to address these questions .


  29. @Retired Teacher,

    Power can be addictive and like drugs and alcohol can make intelligent people make bad decisions.


  30. @Hants | October 21, 2012 at 5:31 PM |
    “Power can be addictive and like drugs and alcohol can make intelligent people make bad decisions.”

    SO TRUE!!

    @ Hants | October 21, 2012 at 3:18 PM |
    “These bastions of leadership need to get some leadership training.”

    If you have never written true words, you just did.

    Many leaders including the subject of this discussion believe that they can do no wrong, and whatever they do is justifiable. Their attitude how dare anyone to criticize them.

    There is a custom in Barbados that people in high rank positions are above the law no matter what, and so they are never required to take that special vacation @ JailHouse.


  31. I tired ah dis discussion now … Nothing more can come of it … Unless Caswell decide to drop in and stir up the pot with some more story tellin’ .. Lemme hear yah Cas … HA HA HA …!


  32. BTW David
    ]Da’ new banner look like a sign that you would expect to see hanging outside a funeral home bro’ … 🙂


  33. Of interest is that Farley’s little story was picked up by the Associated Press.

    http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/barbados-high-school-suspends-265-students-17500113#.UISpfMXA9aY


  34. David the Internet is a powerful and dangerous tool.

    This story is now available to the whole world.

    Fortunately it is not likely to cause an international incident.


  35. @teacher”of suspension allowable AFTER INFORMING THE BOARD AND THE PARENTS BY LETTER under the Education Act is TEN DAYS ) more than 25 % of the students , FOR WHATEVER REASON,
    in one fell swoop, that action is a clear indication that the administration in that school has broken down . That action ”

    ————

    OR….that the principal is acting out of desperaiton because…….the civility obedience and dicsipline in SOCIETY has broken down!!!

    I go with the second, from what I am seeing all over, including schools. We are in deep xhit

    And I for one am glad that Farley got balls.


  36. Now we going hear a lot of ‘cuh dear’ xhjit. Its a tough job, but somebody has to do it.

    Thanks fuh Farley. And I wont tell you have a number of parents from HC have told me of their impression of their Head.

    Not flattering, I assure you.


  37. Last point on this issue….

    People are castigating Farley, instead of the PM (yes the PM) supporting him on discipline etc.

    Why? Because order and discipline is necessary for a functioning society.

    But no, he going want a report, which he will read ‘anon’ after he premabulates around the issue for about a year.

    Are the children running the school, or do we have a leader?

    A lot of bloody excuses for the tail wagging the dog, because we have all become apologists for recklessness and indiscipline.

    But cuh dear, is just a lil skirt showing, nuh. But cuh dear…

    Rudderless, flippin rudderless./

    I going put Farley as PM and Jeff Broome as deputy.

    At least then we will have a xxxing rudder.


  38. crusoe

    I going put Farley as PM and Jeff Broome as deputy.

    ac: btw the PM put Broomes in de dwag house and he not coming out till PM say anyhow maybe fuh de time being he could become deputy dawg


  39. Is it right for a principal to deprive 265 children about 5 full days of solid education paid for by the government i.e the tax payers of barbados?
    I feel that education is a right blah blah something in the constitution of Barbados. This old fool if I was a head teacher would teach how they come cause education is the first priority.
    Do headteachers like magistrates or judges have something called a discretion which they can exercise?.
    Dont you think that it is real harsh to send home 265 children over uniforms,even if those uniforms were like shorts I feel a better way of handling the issue should have been found. I really don’t think that if de whole of Barbados size with Principal Farley that makes his action right. I went to school barefoot and I was not sent home becausde I did not wear shoes.
    Focus please, a mother was fined for keeping her child away from school,Good Lord do you think that this Principal has a charge to answer?


  40. Scrupie | October 22, 2012 at 10:38 PM

    Focus please, a mother was fined for keeping her child away from school,Good Lord do you think that this Principal has a charge to answer?

    ac
    NO!


  41. The good thing about BU is that it allows us all to see why our society is crumbling, and like Crusoe says, it is because most of us are clueless eunochs.
    It not only reflects a lack of leadership, but a complete lack of common sense at all levels – to the point where it is becoming folly to be wise as a result of the prevalence of ignorance.

    Imagine a place where someone needs to be a maverick just to try to raise standards of discipline and to instill good values…there can only be one end for such a people.


  42. And why the hell should it matter if the AP and ABC picked up the story? We (Barbadians) are responsible for running this little place.


  43. Bushie

    Raise standards what! This man is just being an idiot. You should recall the first time he pulled such a stunt, he had to use a ruler to ensure that the hemlines were actually or rather exactly 2 inches below the knee. This man is sick and needs Dr. Ermine Belle’s help urgently. Bushie knowing you, Dr. Connell would be your choice. Bushie please focus rather than try to spew your macho crap. The two-inch below the knee policy was instituted because male teachers were being distracted by these little children. Next thing they will legislate is the bulge in the boys’ trousers to protect female teachers and Farley would enforce it because he has no bulge.

    David

    You want to know why it matters if AP and ABC picked up the story. Because it makes Barbados a laughingstock. So many other newsworthy items are reported and none are picked up internationally and you never asked yourself why.


  44. @Caswell

    We become the laughing stock when a student sprays a crowed classroom with bullets.


  45. I find it curious that 27 first formers were sent home. [Just remember that 6 weeks ago, just before the start of term, these first formers would have presented themselves to the school in their new Garrison (now Graydon Sealy) uniform, at orientation.]


  46. @Ping Pong

    Do you also find it curious that the staff and the school and PTA have been silent as well?


  47. No David, that would not make us a laughingstock: it would be newsworthy, but might be the result if Farley and some of these other pint sized dictators don’t ease up of some of these children. You don’t realise that some of these same heads cause their own children to run from home and not speak with them and you wonder why.

    Because standards have fallen in this country, whenever some clown does something and pronounce that it was done in the name of discipline and lifting standards, some people just jump on the bandwagon without thinking. Why are you not addressing Farley’s constant and continuous breaches of the Public Service rules. This hypocritical society definitely believes in do as I say and not as I do. Which is worse Farley’s breaches of the rules or the students’.


  48. @Caswell

    Is it possible that Farley has sought a deviation from the rule? Yes let us discuss the breach. BU is prepared to post something on it.


  49. David
    the silence of staff is not surprising but I suppose it should be expected that the PTA would make a comment either in support or in opposition. However, let us focus on the first formers. Six weeks ago all was well (supposedly) now 27 are in breach of the rules. What could be reason for this? Did these children and their parents develop a low regard for the Principal and the school over the last 6 weeks or as is more likely … the children grew?


  50. David it is not likely that Farley could have sought and receive some dispensation to breach the rules. First thing, who could grant such a license? Whenever he speaks on a call in programme and he addresses a matter of Government policy, he would have to seek the approval of the individual Minister not his Minister. How is that going to be possible in the seconds that he has to respond? Don’t make excuses for him: he too should be suspended.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading