Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Peter Wickham, Head of CADRES

BU has hesitantly support the science of polling and by extension the work CADRES has done in this area over the years. In Barbados CADRES has developed an enviable track record. Peter Wickham, head of CADRES has always published the methodology used, a desirable approach. Wickham has been at pain to point out that his samples are random. Over the years he has been able to gather learnings with the result his poll predictions are always close to bull-eye when the real result is known.

However many – including BU – have become concerned at the unfettered access to media space where Wickham has beenย  peddling his views. BU has no problem with Wickham being a social commentator, it is a free country, however a problem emerges if he is able to propagate views formed out of his polling through his contributionsย  weekly newspaper columns and as a host of a popular talk show. Bear in mind his polls capture the views of the population at the time taken. BU suggests that the apparent success of CADRES polls fuels Wickhamโ€™s credibility as a social commentator. The result: his views have become influential on the very population he will have to poll in the future.

The Caribbean Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) political strategist Maureen Holder, who succeeded Peter Wickham, has been very scathing in her critique of the methodology of the recent CADRES poll. UWI lecturer Dr. Tennyson Joseph has also been searching in his feedback of the poll in his weekly column. Many have dismissed these concerns based on party stripes or ignorance about the science of polling.ย  We should all take a deep breath and dispassionately discuss if there is merit to the concerns raised by the Holders, Josephs and others.

On another blog BU posted the following comment:

On a related note BU has been doing some research to ascertain if there is any country in the world where a pollster, a shaper of opinions, is also the host of a popular talk show. So far we have come up short. BU believes with all respect to Wickham that we have created a โ€˜monsterโ€™.

So far BUโ€™s research about polling has turned up some interesting information.ย  To be honest if Wickham continues on his current path some will begin to label him a push pollster. Here is what push pollingย  is all aboutย  quoting from Wikipedia:

โ€œA push poll is an interactive marketing technique, most commonly employed during political campaigning, in which an individual or organization attempts to influence or alter the view of respondents under the guise of conducting a poll. In a push poll, large numbers of respondents are contacted, and little or no effort is made to collect and analyze response data. Instead, the push poll is a form of telemarketing-based propaganda and rumor mongering, masquerading as a poll. Push polls may rely on innuendo or knowledge gleaned from opposition research on an opponent. They are generally viewed as a form of negative campaigning.[1] This tactic is commonly considered to undermine the democratic process as false or misleading information is provided about candidates.โ€

Peter you should think on these things!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

150 responses to “Peter Wickham, Pollster, Columnist, Talk Show Host and Social Commentator”


  1. @ David
    At the risk of continuing to be repetitive over the last six years, Bushie again reiterates that Wickham is a fraud.
    He is a not particularly intelligent loser who has been looking desperately for some avenue to appear to be special.

    He takes up controversial positions in an effort to attract attention and clearly will sell his soul to the highest bidder…or at least the one most willing to let him have a job on the ” air”.

    Today he entertained and agreed with a like minded dimwit on Brass Tacks, who lambasted the 11 plus exam as being anti working class and designed to “keep upper and middle class children for mixing with children of working class parents”. What idiocy! Anyone with a bit of common sense can see that the 11plus provides a fair transparent opportunity for EVERY CHILD to get into any school. The FACTS are that the top schools are well represented with children of poor families BECAUSE of the 11plus

    How does such a lightweight intellectual get to be an opinion maker in Barbados? …because OCM is obsessed with DESTROYING all that made this country proud.

    With respect to polling….
    David, if you ask a sample of people to give you information about their feelings and intent, it does not take brain surgery to produce a report on their likely action in the future. Any half decent undergraduate should be able to do this.
    The way Wickham seeks to milk this for financial, image and other personal (including vengeful) benefits is disgusting.

    …plus he is a coward without the balls to debate on BU…. ๐Ÿ™‚


  2. Is Maureen Holder a qualified political scientist?
    Does she have a track record of any kind as a pollster?
    Is Tennyson Joseph a qualified political Scientist?
    Does he have a track record of any kind as a pollster?
    Are they both employed in situations that suggest that they might be beholden to the Party in Power and might just be singing for their supper?

    While I empathise with your concerns about the 3 or so hats that Peter Wickham wears, I have listened to him occasionally on Brass Tacks and really find him to be straightforward, honest and willing to fearlessly, forcefully and intelligently defend his stances.

    He just tells it like he sees it. imho


  3. it woud be interesting to see a sampling of the questions asked by PETER WICKHAM to the respondents, he should thread kind of soflty since the perception given after wikileaks he is not to be trusted prior to wikileaks his polling would have been scuntinized base on peoples biases but giving his involvement with the wikileaks people would be more suspect of his trustworthiness,


  4. @ Check it out
    What in fact is a QUALIFIED POLLSTER ? when you find out please tell us all . How is it that a man who is STRAIGHTFORWARD , and HONEST can find NOTHING COMMENDABLE to say of Prime Minister Stuart who, whether you like him or not , you MUST admit is beyond doubt one of the most intellectually gifted leaders in the Caribbean ?


  5. @ Check it out
    Further , for your information , Maureen Holder is the HOLDER of TWO Masters degrees in Political science . You may decide if this makes you a ” qualified political scientist ” .


  6. @ Bush Tea .
    Any person who can make the kind of comments Wickham and his guest on brass tacks made about the 11 plus exam is intellectually dishonest . Green Fields in the City is perhaps the closest village to Harrison College . I am sure that if a boy from Green Fields had “strayed ” on to he grounds of that institution BEFORE we had the 11 plus exam he would be in grave danger of being arrested . HE JUST COULD NOT SET FOOT IN OR ON THE PREMISES OF THAT ” HALLOWED ” PLACE !

  7. Bdos Underground Talkshop Avatar
    Bdos Underground Talkshop

    Lies,
    damned lies,
    and
    statistics.


  8. @ David .
    As a comparison between Mr Arthur and Mr Stuart : You known that Mr Arthur would have cursed Wickham long time ago were he to keep up that daily attack on him ; I am not yet convinced that Mr Stuart on the other hand hears anything Wickham says about him . It seems that when it comes to Wickham Stuart just pulls the hearing aid when Wickham goes on his tirades .

  9. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Bush Tea | October 16, 2012 at 10:15 PM |

    Can BU confirm that the opinion Bushie holds of Peter W and his polling is the same one he held in 2007.

    In regard to your statement on OCM intent on destroying everything that made Barbados proud, can you tell us who sold the media houses to OCM? Not Bajans businessmen? Arenโ€™t the OCM entities in Barbados managed by local Bajan executives in the form of Mrs. Gittens and Vic Fernandes.

    BTW, the owner of the Advocate is also a shareholder in the Nation Publishing Co.

  10. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Disturbed . | October 16, 2012 at 10:45 PM |
    “Further , for your information , Maureen Holder is the HOLDER of TWO Masters degrees in Political science .”

    Why would a person want to have two MASTERS Degrees in the same discipline? Why not go to the next level?
    Where did she pursue these two degrees? Who paid for these? Taxpayers?

    If the answers to the above are UWI and taxpayers you have just closed the case for making UWI a full fee paying Institution for students pursuing these types of luxury disciplines.


  11. @ Bush Tea,
    You cannot be a talk show host,newspaper columnist and a pollster.

    Wickham can be considered a credible pollster if he gives up activities that can influence public opinion.

    His only job in the media should be to explain the methodologies and results of the polls he directs.

    As for the 11 plus; I went to Kolij in the 60s and there were large numbers of boys from all walks of life.
    There is nothing wrong with the 11 plus. The focus must be to improve primary schools so as to get students better prepared for secondary school.


  12. @ Miller …
    ASK HER !!!!!!


  13. We live in a strange Barbados.

    In 2007/8, Peter Wickham was the toast of the DLP. In fact Peter is credited with helping David Thompson wrestle the leadership away from Clyde Mascoll and Thompson becoming leader of the opposition.

    He conducted polls showing that the DLP was winning. The Dems had no problem then, they embraced him and the Bees lambasted him. They had no problem with his methodology then because it favoured the DLP. He was moderating programmes on VOB. There was no problem then, so what is the problem now?

    That’s being hypocritical!


  14. Disturbed;

    You said “Prime Minister Stuart who, whether you like him or not , you MUST admit is beyond doubt one of the most intellectually gifted leaders in the Caribbean ?”

    You must be kidding! FS is one of the most intellectually gifted leaders in the Caribbean? If you’d said the most consistent user of unnecessary and arcane words among the leaders of the Caribbean I would have certainly agreed with you. But Intellectually gifted leader?

    Thanks for the information on Ms. Holder’s 2 Masters Degrees in political science. Good for her. Now what about her polling experience and the other questions I posed?

  15. Free money anyone ask Santapee Bradshaw she knows where to find it ? Avatar
    Free money anyone ask Santapee Bradshaw she knows where to find it ?

    This young lady has quickly dissolved her morals and good judgment ( some may ask if she ever had good morals to have as boyfriend that creepy one Hoyos ) for the sake of election money, least we forget the fate of Roger Smith the former BLP Candidate in St Philip and former employee at Sagicor Life $ 3 Million dollars missing and later he is sent to prison for the theft of this said money.

    Let us look at these houses built by an unqualified contractor in D and B Reality in the person of Delisle Bradshaw at Lower Burney. And the fact that her father was the contractor and she was the lawyer for the purchaser and the lawyer for the contractor who was also her father.

    This was the same contractor that qualified whom of those that applied to own a home and who were to get houses, there were certain pre conditions that were required before being considered suitable to enter the deal one that her employees all got houses, two those who were in line to get a house were required to use the services of Santia Bradshaw to be paid to do all the legal work for the sale, her office legal clerk, her secretary all got houses without applying to NHC and the Auditor Generalโ€™s report stated that he could not understand why the allocation of these houses was done by the builder and not the NHC when the NHC had over 40,000 persons waiting houses.

    Then there was a letter written to Prime Minister David Thompson on 18 th May 2010 by a J P the owners of Lot 35 at Lower Burney, complaining that the flooring had fallen in and and that the steps had run away and left the house before they moved into the house at Lot 35Lower Burney.

    This was a house that D and B Reality Bradshawโ€™s father Delise Bradshaw had built and she acted for both her father and the property owner until the property owner learnt of the relationship and fired her.

    Is this what is offering itself to represent honest Barbadian people that go to work every day and work hard for their every cent to live by ?

    Whereas this one has already concocted every scam to undermine the system and defraud taxpayers seems to me the average person would do a better job than she, in representing ordinary peoples interest on this island, this woman has not yet started a political life and is already a proven and confirmed vagabond and fraud of taxpayers monies.

  16. Can anyone take Fred Gollop's One Media Group half seriously ?????? Avatar
    Can anyone take Fred Gollop’s One Media Group half seriously ??????

    This started to be dealt with in Senate on Wednesday it made my hair stand up straight when I heard Minister Maxine McClean make mention of it and expected that i would have seen it reported in the rag the Nation, and we await the traditional press to have been awake and alert to this fraud taking place in front of the public by a BLP hopeful,none other than the daughter of Delisle Bradshaw of Pele Parris murder fame, the old people used to say That The Berry Donโ€™t Fall Too Far From The Tree, and it seems so true in this case, his daughter someone who has not made it to government but has already masterminded and carried out a plot on the taxpayers and hard working people of Barbados a plot to the tune of in excess of Half A Million Dollars !!!!!!!!!!

    Do you realise that on further research it has come to the table that Entertainment Network Inc has Santia Bradshaw listed as the companies sole director ? ? ?

    So she got over Half A Million Dollars in GRANT FUNDING between her two companies Entertainment Network and Pyramid Entertainment from EGFL and now looking into a third company which also benefited from the goodwill by another $230,000.00 to see if it shows her collecting another $ 230,000.00 from that company source as well to.

    This is made even more amazing when one realises that on one mortgage she had held with Scotia Bank that figure was $ 670,0000.00 and was recently paid off in full .

    This is totally amazing really it is, this is a person who claims the government does not assist businesses but this government is the same one she scammed and extracted over a Half A Million Dollars from that allowed her to pay off one of her three mortgages with the proceeds of EGFL GRANT Funding.

    I eagerly await the upcoming coverage in the Advocate as it is not very beneficial news for the BLP and as such it is hardly likely to make it in the Nation this coming year.

    ย ย ย ย ย ย 

  17. Can anyone take Fred Gollop's One Media Group half seriously ?????? Avatar
    Can anyone take Fred Gollop’s One Media Group half seriously ??????

    David | October 16, 2012 at 8:50 PM
    Document received allegedly showing two of Santia Bradshaw companies receiving several hundred thousand dollars from Enterprise Growth Fund:

    http://bajan.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/santia_bradshaw.jpg

    ย ย ย 


  18. Predictably the discussion has taken a partisan form.

    @miller

    Bush Tea has been very consistent on polling and was the first one to challenge Peter Wickham when he engaged on BU back in 2007. In fact it is because of Bush Tea that Wickham probably decided not to continue posting on BU.


  19. David Ellis gave an insight into some of the consideration which goes into selecting moderators. It is a business.

    Peter’s influence has grown enormously since 2007/2008. The discussion must consider the current reality. This is not 2008.

    He is a pollster, he can get on the radio, newspaper owned by the media which is widely circulated and hammer, hammer his views. Then he goes back out and poll the people.

    It is a legitimate position to discuss what is obviously a conflict of positions.

    Bear in mind BU’s position on the outcome of the election was stated since May.

    For the sake of this first argument let us assume that his polling is accurate. We are asking if his access to media allows him to be an opinion shaper?


  20. “Bushie again reiterates that Wickham is a fraud”
    it will e interesting bushie to learn if you held this view after the 2007 poll.

  21. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ David | October 17, 2012 at 1:58 AM |
    “Bush Tea has been very consistent on polling and was the first one to challenge Peter Wickham when he engaged on BU back in 2007. In fact it is because of Bush Tea that Wickham probably decided not to continue posting on BU.”

    Well I admire his consistency on this one. Bushie can be a ‘man of principles’, sometimes.


  22. The debate here must be seen in context. Fours years have elapsed which gives time for questions to be asked. Some of the questions were asked in 2007 but were not as strident. BU has always supported Wickham even when Belle brought the Chapo/Boxill poll to Barbados. However let us remember the Nation stop posting Wickham articles in 2007, he was fired from CBC, the Nation did not commission the September poll in 2012(??) as customary etc. A lot has happened which deserves discussion.

    Here is some more info about push polling:

    http://www.newsucanuse.org/push-polling-insidious-and-effective/

    Push polling โ€“ insidious and effective

    With the election cycle now underway, many Americans will be responding to political polls about who they
    support in the races for president and other offices. But can the poll questions themselves influence how people vote?
    Despite the frequent use of hypothetical questions in political polling, market research and jury selection,there has been little research focusing on
    how and under what circumstances such โ€œWhat ifโ€ฆ?โ€ questions influence our behavior. A new series of studies offers some clarity.
    Researchers found that hypothetical questions can help our brains access specific positive or negative knowledge referenced by
    the question. As a result, the questions themselves can alter our behavior, though we can resist these influences if we are aware of their effects on us.
    The research, from Duke Universityโ€™s Fuqua School of Business, the University of Alberta School of Business,
    the University of Southern California and Stanford University, is set to be published in the journal Organizational
    Behavior and Human Decision Processes and is now available online at http://sd1.myipcn. โ€ฆ 597811001099 .

    โ€œHypothetical questions are essentially wolves in sheepโ€™s clothing,โ€ said Gavan Fitzsimons, professor of marketing and psychology at Fuqua.
    โ€œSeemingly innocuous questions can make positive knowledge accessible while negative questions can make negative knowledge
    accessible. In other words, being asked hypothetical questions that are consistent with our existing knowledge or
    our preconceived notions has a biasing effect on us โ€” without our knowledge and without our consent.โ€

    The researchers conducted a series of surveys that examined voting choices, legal decision-making and consumption behavior.
    One survey asked students a series of hypothetical questions about politicians, with some questions framed positively and some negatively.
    Additional surveys featured questions about the nutritional value of sugar substitutes, defendants in simulated court cases and snack food preferences.

    โ€œPolitical pollsters are very aware that the language they use in so-called โ€˜push pollingโ€™ can not only influence the way questions are answered, they can also push people away from one candidate and pull them toward another,โ€ said Sarah Moore, assistant professor of marketing at the University of Alberta.

    โ€œIn one of our surveys,โ€ Moore said, โ€œwe asked respondents if learning a politician had been convicted of accepting a bribe
    would make them less likely to vote for that person. Alternatively, we asked another group of respondents if learning a politician
    had refused to accept a bribe would make them more likely to vote for that person. The negative question resulted in 37 percent
    of respondents being less likely to vote for the convicted politician. The positive question found 83 percent of respondents more
    likely to vote for the honest politician. In both cases, the bribe context was purely hypothetical, and yet the two groupsโ€™ voting intentions differed dramatically.โ€

    One survey asked a group of prospective jurors waiting to serve at a courthouse to imagine they were being screened by attorneys
    at a criminal trial. During a simulated jury selection, the group was asked a series of hypothetical questions alluding to the defendantโ€™s
    gang membership. These jurors were much more likely to issue guilty verdicts and recommend harsher sentences than jurors who
    were not asked the hypothetical questions related to gang membership.

    Another group of respondents undertook a similar survey; however, this group was first told that the screening questions were submitted
    by attorneys for the defense and prosecution and, as potential jurors, they should not use the questions to draw conclusions about
    the case. Respondents in this group were able to correct for the biases normally induced by the hypothetical questions, becoming
    less likely to vote the defendant guilty and recommending shorter jail terms.

    โ€œOur research has shown that hypothetical questions can influence our actions, but weโ€™ve also confirmed that when we are aware
    of the effects of hypothetical questions, we can correct our biases,โ€ said Baba Shiv, professor of marketing at Stanford. โ€œPublic
    education is needed to raise awareness of how hypothetical questions can sway our actions.โ€

    Provided by Duke University

  23. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Can anyone take Fred Gollop’s One Media Group half seriously ?????? | October 17, 2012 at 1:25 AM |

    Why don’t you and your alter ego โ€œFree moneyโ€ tell us on BU when these grants were disbursed? If they were disbursed during the period the DLP administration has been in power it can only be a sad reflection on the present administration to grant to (according to you) an alleged fraudster so much money to pay off her other mortgages. Why the money borrowed from the NIS to give to Santapee?

    We are willing to bet that the DLP is not that stupid to borrow money just to finance the Santapee lifestyle and personal business ventures. If these advances took place under a DLP administration if must be in return for her agreeing to support the party (DLP) like a true turncoat following in the footsteps of Braddie and Hammie a disease endemic to the pseudo representatives of SMSE.

    So who is being to look like an idiot here; Santapee or Maxine the joker and liar?

    Do some further investigation and you might just establish correctly the timeframe these grants were made along with the others. This is just a ploy by Maxine to scandalise the young lady and to make it look as if the DLP is a kind and loving party to all entrepreneurs whether D or B prepared to help out its political enemies even in such hard time. Nonsense and lies we say!


  24. @ David

    This is not gossip, I have cross referenced this with a good few people in Barbados.

    The former Prime Minister is back drinking very, very hard and reports are that drinking this much while a bad diabetic makes for a serious problem. Have notice how fat and puffy his face is looking again?

    One more that one occasion he has described Mia as ‘that boy Mia’. Anyone willing to listen will be told ‘it was that boy Mia who awarded the contract to VECO for the Dodds Prison while I was out of Barbados’ or ‘Mia and this bulling and wicking business hurts the BLP, bajans ain’t like that nasty shite’.


  25. Since Peter writes a weekly column in the most read daily newspaper he certainly has the facility to shape or alter public opinion.However we accepted with open arms the results of the poll that predicted victory for us.If that same methodology was used again this time,how in hell do we question it?


  26. @David

    We would humbly suggest that you were slightly too harsh on Wickham . As you know we have a generalized disdain for the political culture in Barbados and support all efforts to have it dismantled. However, this jibe at Wickham is unhelpful given his previous work. People like us who have conducted many studies over time have come to know statistics as, at least, both a science and an art. Science alone will never be enough to explain Wickham’s generally good predictive record. In any event BU does not need a poll to judge that the DLP, like most incumbent governments everywhere, is likely to loose the coming elections. Of course there are some internal causative factors too. The error in these predictions (5%) can only be helpful to the DLP if they have Owen Seymour Arthur, on tape, ‘thiefing’ or committing murder. What Wickham’s work will never predict is that the Barbadian public will be again ready to oust the BLP within 12 months of re-electing them. So the real questions should be about the utility of populations studies for development. And how do we, as a nation, compensate for public perceptions that go from hot to cold within a year, absent extreme circumstances.


  27. @Hamilton Hill

    You have missed the point here.

  28. Can anyone take Fred Gollop's One Media Group half seriously ?????? Avatar
    Can anyone take Fred Gollop’s One Media Group half seriously ??????

    Miller do you agree Bradshaw received in excess of HALF A MILLION DOLLARS of TAXPAYERS MONIES ? YES or NO ?

    Before you lie or are forced to lie on behalf of your corrupt party and its collection of fraudsters the answer is YES she created companies and used them to defraud tax payers.

    With that action alone she can be described as a fraud but add to it action with the owners of lot 37 at Lower Burney and we see the first act of fraud was not one done by accident.


  29. @Pacha

    The thesis of BU’s argument is not about Cadres’s predictive model, it is about the opportunity to shape public opinion. In marginal constituencies this reality will have the affect of shaping the size of the Opposition/government. It is useful to remind everyone that BU Election Picks has the BLP out front.


  30. As a”fraud” peter wickham can be describe as “a Pious fraud”one who practices deceptionfor the sake of what they deemed as good. along that backdrop and his mouthings of the Privatisation /sale of barbados assests also his role in trying to sway public opinion on most political isssues by the structing of questions asked via his polling .he has projected his level of dishonesty in way similiar to being a “con artist”having the abilty to laugh in ones face and tattle behind ones bak manifested by wikileaks


  31. @ac

    It is hard to accept comments from partisans for a simple reason, in 2007/2008 BLPites were against the CADRES Poll and in 2012 DLPites against.


  32. What is the problem exactly? If you are suggesting that one man can influence an electorate how to vote, then the vox populi is the voice of an ass, not the voice of God!

    Stuart intellectually gifted? Who ever made such a claim?


  33. @David

    But surely you would not want to proffer that Wickham is not entitled to make a living or not be guaranteed your pet peeve – free speech. If you have determined that his is a conflict of interest, these conflicts permeate the whole society. Barbados was built on conflicting roles! Why pick on Wickham? What your argument could do is to buy in to a narrative that seeks to set up Wickham as a straw man for the failures of the DLP. And deeper failures occurring within a wider environment that are unhelpful to the DLP. We don’t think that would have been your intention. There are many factors that could have an influence on the coming elections. Why Wickham? Why not go fundamental and question other political apparatchiks who are illegally spending hundreds of thousands of dollars, right now, to ‘shape’ the election results. Yes, he may have some marginal influence but we fail to see him as having the power suggested by you. And even if he did there are other forces within the body politic that will try to create the appearance of balance.

  34. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Can anyone take Fred Gollop’s One Media Group half seriously ?????? | October 17, 2012 at 8:00 AM |
    “Before you lie or are forced to lie on behalf of your corrupt party and its collection of fraudsters the answer is YES she created companies and used them to defraud tax payers.”

    The ACT OF FRAUD is a Criminal Offence under the laws of Barbados.
    Why don’t you advise the DLP to institute criminal proceedings against the named individual to bring some form of restitution to the same defrauded taxpayers by way of selling her assets and other ill-gotten gains?

    Go ahead “CATFGOMGHS????” tell the DLP to charge her for grand larceny and fraud! Or are you afraid that similar charges will have to be brought against the BWA fraudsters too? After all, the amount defrauded from the BWA is a large amount too that taxpayers and consumers would gladly like to see recovered to fix the many broken mains or to mitigate the risks of a cholera outbreak even if it means having to pay a politician running in the upcoming elections $15,000 p/m as a consultant for water quality as if she is diagnosing urine for infections like any basic medical practitioner can do.

    BTW the miller does not deny that grants were advanced. It’s the time that they were advanced that you must clarify since you seem to know what’s going on inside out.


  35. @ David

    Notwithstanding, we have argued elsewhere that charges should have been filed against Wickham for spying for a foreign government or acting as a NOC. If this had happen, there would be no need to see him as a nemesis for the DLP.


  36. @Pacha

    Surely you are correct and it explains the many issues raised on BU over time. This Wickham issue is only but another ‘symptom’.

  37. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Disturbed . | October 16, 2012 at 11:27 PM |
    “@ Miller โ€ฆASK HER !!!!!!”

    Why should I ask her? You are the one making the claim that she has two โ€˜Mastersโ€™ degrees in Political Science. Not Maureen, unless she is so mentally disturbed by her recent foray into intellectual prostitution.

    Only goes to show you are a blasted liar and the lengths you will go to peddle your lies and venom. Very disturbing indeed!


  38. As far as BU is aware Maureen Holder has a BSc in Political Science and a MSc in International Trade.


  39. @David

    What about OSA. He openly said in Barbados that he broke the law in relation to moneys received, its commingling and its use in a political campaign. But not even an investigation. If the DLP government was serious there could have long employ the laws currently on the books to benefit from the failures of their political enemies or potential political enemies against them but it will be a cold night in hell before any political leader is Barbados is brought before the courts. Or just merely adhere to the law. This is justice, Barbados style.

  40. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Disturbed . | October 16, 2012 at 10:41 PM |
    “… Prime Minister Stuart who, whether you like him or not , you MUST admit is beyond doubt one of the most intellectually gifted leaders in the Caribbean ?”

    One must say that your statement is not an adulation of the man but in fact a really sad reflection of the intellectual wealth or should it be โ€˜paucityโ€™ in the Caribbean today. If what we hear from Stuart is to be considered โ€˜intellectualโ€™ depth them we should consider whither the UWI as a leading light of modern intellectual thought.

    Sad reflection, indeed! Serious implications for the quality of leadership we can expect where mediocrity is now prized as the zenith of intellectual brilliance and high achievement. No wonder we are where we are? Most disturbing indeed, even alarming, donโ€™t you think?


  41. @Free money anyone ask Santapee Bradshaw she knows where to find it ? | October 17, 2012 at 1:21 AM |
    AND
    @Can anyone take Fred Gollop’s One Media Group half seriously ?????? …………………………………………………….

    The ramblings of you two, though you seem to be one and the same George Street yardfowls, prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the DLP is not trustworthy, honest, competent or confidential and should not hold office to manage the affairs of this country. You have no honour or decency of how to operate in public life.

    The elections cant come soon enough. The fumbling idiot we have for a PM has now boxed himself into a corner from which he has little wriggle room.

    It is now too late to call it October, he would not call it in November cause he wants to parade at Independence, he cannot call it in December as they lambasted Owen Arthur for announcing the 2008 election in December and he HAS to call it before February 12, 2013 as by law, he cannot sit in the House after that date and Estimates HAVE to be laid.

    So how smart is Freundel????? Tell me that!


  42. @Pacha

    There is no evidence that Wickham was a ‘spy’. Like Prodigal Son has opined, people do the cocktail circuit and use chit chat to formulate intelligence.


  43. @millertheanunnaki | October 17, 2012 at 9:13 AM | Beautifully put. Completely agree!!!


  44. @David
    We are unaware about your exposure to the murky and insidious nature of the matter to which you speak. We are not saying proof that should be a matter for the courts. But certainty, the government was concerned enough to censor Wickham. There is also the Wikileaks cables that detail the information derived from this source. We would also like to think that Barbados has a modicum of intelligence capability to reconstruct certain events that could build a case. What is a spy? We have enough evidence to suggest that Wickham had communications with a foreign official. Communication that might of had implications for the national security of Barbados. That communication was treated by that official as the collection of sensitive information and handled as such. In the USA, if it was found that a political consultant had that type of secretive communication with an (unfriendly) ambassador – the ambassador would have been expelled for acts inconsistent with status and Wickham would have been seen as a spy, even though he might have been an unwitting spy – a spy nonetheless. Our point is that there should have at least been a treason investigation.

  45. Drink the Kool-Aid Avatar
    Drink the Kool-Aid

    @ David

    Stop defending Peter Wickham with claims of innocently giving information to the American Goverment via the cocktail circuit. That is non-sense and you know. Check http://www.cablegatesearch.net/cable.php?id=06BRIDGETOWN239 and get the details.

    Here is are the facts which are based on American government intellegence cable from Bridgetown, Barbados:-

    1.”The affable Wickham has met periodically with Emboffs over the past several years to offer his views on a variety of issues.”

    2. “Wickham identifies himself as a liberal and his clients are typically labor parties. He says, however, that it is preferable to work for ruling parties, regardless of ideology, because they tend to pay their bills.”

    3. “Caribbean political campaigns are awash with money from a variety of sources, particularly wealthy expatriates seeking to influence governments, according to regional political consultant Peter Wickham. The availability of money favors ruling parties and has dramatically changed the way campaigns are run, giving inordinate influence to outside consultants, as well as non-nationals and members of the diaspora from whom much of
    the money is raised.”

    Peter Wickham has no credibility based on the illegence contained within the Wikileaks cables.


  46. This article is a poor article.It sounds just like Keith Holder on his call -in show every week when he seeks to bash the UWI Cricket set-up You people have a problem with excellence and the strive for excellence. I do not like your attitude at all at all. All of a sudden something is wrong with Peter ‘s poll–All of a sudden !! CHEESE ON !

  47. Drink the Kool-Aid Avatar
    Drink the Kool-Aid

    @ David

    At best he is a snitch and at worst he is a ‘spy’.

    Peter Wickham is looking to land someone who will push his liberal homosexual agenda in Barbados including making the necessary (according to him) changes to de-criminalise lesbian and homosexual conduct.

    I AGREE with PM Stuart, I would not sit on any stage, anywhere with someone like Peter Wickham after it became public that that person betrayed their country.

  48. Drink the Kool-Aid Avatar
    Drink the Kool-Aid

    @ David

    Lets face it, if you read all of the wikileaks cables then it is clear that Peter Wickham betrayed not only his country but more than likely betrayed the confidence of some of the very people who employed him as a political consultant.

    Read the wikileaks cables and see for yourself, Peter Wickham was a regular provider of information to the American government.


  49. David based on your comment OCT 17 8.24 you have prejudge based on fact as for one some of us might have been independants and further more you have no proof of my political affiliation or issues back therefore your only p stance would be to agree or disagree any how i am accessing wikhams credibilty and trustworthiness based on the fact that he gave out confidential and what could be sensitive information to the USA govt and then tried to deny knoweldge of such how can he be trusted.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading