Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Prime Minister Fruendel Stuart

Minister of Culture Stephen Lashley was quoted in the press on the weekend blaming the lack of a media policy at the National Cultural Foundation (NCF) for feeding perennial controversies during the Crop Over period. To summarize his view: the ad hoc manner NCF officials have interacted with the media must stop. BU agrees with the minister that an effective media policy will always add value to the process of disseminating timely and accurate information.

To support Lashley view, we had another Lashley demonstrating why a media policy is useful. Yesterday at the St. James North Democratic Labour Party (DLP) Constituency meeting Minister of Housing Michael Lashley reacted to the CADRES poll by telling party supporters, โ€œpolls donโ€™t voteโ€. Lashley who has been unusually silent in recent weeks – as well as Minister of Agriculture David Estwick โ€“ no doubt strayed from his substantive script of expounding about governmentโ€™s housing program to share his views on the findings of the CADRES poll.

BU suspects that Nation newspaper reporter Mike King travelled to the St. James North Constituency meeting with great anticipation stoked by the release of the CADRES poll. Lashley did not disappoint. Here is a classic case where a media policy of government should have kicked in to guide public pronouncements about how to treat with the CADRES matter by key government officials.ย  Especially given the nature of its findings. The nonsensical comments attributed to Minister of Housing Michael Lashley in the Nation newspaper showed clearly his comments were off the cuff and exposed a kind of lethargy by our leadership which is not welcomed in 2012.

Lashleyโ€™s comments reflect the urgent need for government โ€“ even at this late state in its term โ€“ to implement a communications policy. Not since the death of David Thompson has the government been able to establish a coherent and cogent dialogue with the LOCAL media. Has it occurred to the DLP hierarchy by now that ALL utterances about the CADRES poll by government ministers and close others will be placed under the microscope?ย ย 

BU is not a fan of election polls but like the โ€˜Examโ€™ there is no alternative to scientifically measure the mood of the electorate. Again, BU is not a fan of many of Peter Wickhamโ€™s โ€˜positionsโ€™ but his poll results over the years have always been close to the mark. His mentor Pat Emmanuel must be pleased. Last general election BLP members were โ€˜cussinโ€™ and the DLPites were singing Wickhamโ€™s praises. How things have changed after only one term.

If BU were in Stuartโ€™s position Wickhamโ€™s poll would have created by now the need to schedule a strategy session with the parliamentary group and other key persons in the DLP before weekend. Barbadians, except DLP hacks are not surprised at CADRES findings, understandable in an austere economic climate.

Prime Minister Stuart may be a nice guy and noble in his intentions. A leader must lead. Stuart must think on these things.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. @Boy Blue | May 23, 2012 at 3:21 PM |
    And never underestimate the real swinging power of those voters who have no affiliation with either political party.
    =====================
    Very true…swing voters usually make all the difference especially when there’s a high voter turnout.


  2. It is clear that Mr Stuart will not be PM after General Election night irrespective which party wins the poll. So why hasten him, allow him his “one moment in time”. My opinion is that he WILL NOT contest the coming election, but the DLP will only know that when he visits the GG to dissolve parliament that would be the ultimate diss for the Eager 11 to have to choose a leader at the eleventh hour (no pun intended).
    Think about it, the Eager 11 does not want him so why stress himself to contest an election where afterwards he does not have a role to play. If the party loses he will be blamed for the defeat and IF big IF the DLP wins can we expect for the Eager 11 to vote for him as PM? I think NOT.

  3. David (not BU) Avatar
    David (not BU)

    @Zack
    Thatโ€™s a valid comment. Many of them believe that a second term is automatic based on history. They are in for a rude awakening.

    i think it is more than that. i believe they have sounded themselves with people who only tell them what they want to hear. so in their world if you say you see a problem you automatically become a BLP supporter. it does not get any sadder than that really.


  4. To be fair to the PM if he leads the party to an election win why would his colleagues not support his for PM? A win would be a mandate from the people. However selecting the PM does not have to have logic as a base.


  5. @ Watching
    ” allow him his one moment in time”, Are you for real??? At the expense of the country?
    Your whole comment is about Stuart how, he feels, how he can take revenge on the E11. Do you relize that these people are not managing a clubhouse , but a COUNTRY?
    This is crazr!


  6. David
    Because certain members or member of the Eager11 are too eager to be PM and it has absolutely nothing to do about the country Barbados.
    I have said before it time that we mature as c country where those who want to run for Parliament need to have some kind of means test to try and separate the sheep from the wolves. As it is now anything or everything that crawls out of the wood work can become a candidate and with the luck of the draw become an MP. Case in point the St. John by-election any and everybody wanted to be a candidate because it is thought to be an easy seat to win for the DLP( no disrespect to Mrs Thompson). I am sure when Cynthia Forde decides to hang up her gloves the same will obtain in St Thomas.


  7. A citizin
    Yes I am for real because what sense would it serve to remove Stuart now. Not so long about we had so much in fighting in the DLP under Sandiford and what was the result it was several years before they could catch themselves . Bear in mind the DLP cannot remove Mr Stuart without the opposition’s support so why give the BLP more ammunition at this time to lessen their chances.
    Also is the BLP ready for the election at this time. Why throw the country into unneccessry turmoil a few more month is not long to wait. Patience please !! (he has to call elections by April/May 2013) but then again we have become a microwave /instant society.


  8. @ Watching
    Yes, you’re for real. But if I understand you correctly , you have absolutely no faith in the DLP MPs. Stuart according to you is the best from the lot, that’s all. You don’t think he’s all that great.
    If that’s what you think, why in heaven’s name would you want them for another term? Because you think that the BLP is worse than this sorry bunch?
    Lawd, help us.


  9. Today’s Nation quotes PM Stuart as accepting both praise and criticism with “phlegmatic serenity”.In my dictionary the adjective phlegmatic conveys a meaning of not easily excited or agitated;also sluggish and apathetic.Now bloggers all,you have heard it from the horse’s mouth.Stuart admits to being sluggish and apathetic.Admits to the bajanism”I.N.K”.So you see why this PM has no vision for Barbados!It’s not in his makeup.Up to this day we have not been told if he has read the report on Clico or Baico.He admits to not reading the result of the latest cadre poll.I support the view that PM Stuart will not be running again and will leave this announcement until the very last minute.The writing is on the wall.The Eager 11 will not go away.They recognise Stuart’s stewardship is going to cost them another term,therefore the internal agitation will surface again.


  10. Stuart by admitting there is nothing exciting in the Clico Report has read it.


  11. @zack

    I have an opinion like any body else wether you agree or not does not phase me !Stupid!


  12. @A citizin | May 23, 2012 at 4:12 PM |
    @ Watching
    โ€ allow him his one moment in timeโ€, Are you for real??? At the expense of the country?
    Your whole comment is about Stuart how, he feels, how he can take revenge on the E11. Do you relize that these people are not managing a clubhouse , but a COUNTRY?
    This is crazr!
    =====================
    Exactly Citizen. That’s the mentality of small minds…they seem to forget that the management of the country should be first and foremost.


  13. @ac | May 23, 2012 at 5:20 PM |
    @zack
    I have an opinion like any body else wether you agree or not does not phase me !Stupid!
    ==============================
    Take it as you wish

  14. Observing (and awaiting the inevitable) Avatar
    Observing (and awaiting the inevitable)

    Thanks for the definition Richard.

    @others
    Stuart will run. It’s not in his makeup to drop out at the last minute.


  15. @ Caswell Franklyn

    Do you remember when OSA was first elected PM and how people used to cringe when he spoke? I remember clearly for the first 2 years or so his live public announcements were litter with bad grammer and he stuttered from one point to another. I remember being told by my parents that he was not PM material based on previous Pm’s of Barbados. How wrong did they turn out to be?

    I don’t say this to be critical of the OSA or to laugh at him, I am merely making the point that it takes time to grow into the shoes of PM and become an effective leader. I prefer oneone who takes their time and tries to get the decision right over one who thinks they have something to prove by making any decision so long at its quick.

    On polling day I suspect bajans will come to the conclusion “cuh dear, He ain’t do anyone anything and He is a decent man, lets leave him alone”


  16. @Fosforos
    You’re another simpleton. This is 1994 all over again.

  17. old onion bags Avatar
    old onion bags

    $17 Million given (loaned) to BTA from NIS Fund…..Is that what the NIS Fund is for to pay wages ? …Labour stalwarts must be turning in their grave….of importance is the TIMING of the release of this impropriety…..when all attention is diverted elsewhere.Leadership problem will be but a miniscule in contrast to financial wreck the country will be in when this inept DLP administration exits.


  18. @Zack !

    take it as you wish!

    Indeed i did! i didn’t know you were that dumb to forward a response! any how have fun counting yuh chickens before they hatch


  19. Stupse.
    PM Stuart is a reflection of the entire Cabinet–don’t have a plan, never had a plan….make it up as we go along. The party came to power on PR and demagoguery–both mastered by the late David Thompson. He died and those two weapons/tactics deserted the party. If you examine Thompson’s policies and other pronouncements there were no more visionary than PM Stuart. “Barbados is more than an economy it is a society”? How profound!!! Thompson’s two Budgets were essentially about taxes and free bus fares, which was not even an election promise. The Manifesto…again PR.. no cohesive, realistic or visionary policies. That’s why unlike many here, what looks like the fast approaching demise of this administration does not surprise me one bit. I have been saying it since 2008.
    Governing requires action not all talk and it seems that too many of the Cabinet Ministers are lazy and indiscipline. That’s why the government may be burdened with Redjet, AX, CLICO, Four Seasons etc etc etc. Is it just the PM?
    On another note (which one could argue is related), only last week Minister Kellman stated that there would never be a fishing agreement yet this week PM Bissessar-Persad said otherwise. What is the truth?


  20. @ Zack

    You are entitled to your own opinion but you don’t have to be a pig. I guess when you are raised a pig, you don’t realise you’re a pig. Insults and screaming loud and hard won’t give you what it is you crave.


  21. Life is strange..
    David Thompson stabbed Sandiford in the back and with Leroy Parris allowed the 2003 campaign money to dry up then to get rid of Mascoll in a bid to win the post of PM. Then he died. Now the DLP would die to have Mascoll in their camp.

    Owen re-took the leadership after Thompson’s death and oust Mia Mottley. And I predict that after the BLP wins election in 2013, the majority of the BLP MPs will make Mia Mottley the PM thus inflicting the same act that Owen did to her.

    Life is strange. Do unto others as you would like done unto yourself!

  22. old onion bags Avatar
    old onion bags

    The discarded Alexandra teachers were having a good laugh today as queen retribution finally paid the St.Peter family a visit. I am told the staff room was alive…..the words on the march… “it’s not at all ended…we shall overcome…..faith brings wonders”…but a few comments and remarks.
    You are deserving.


  23. I will vote for the Dems cause I know when they win they will not put Stuart back there as PM. He is a complete waste of space and time. It is a pity that Chris claimed not to want the position – he would do a dman good job.

    It will therefore boil down to Sealy or Inniss. They are both good fellas and friends since HC days. I must confess that I like Sealy but Inniss works harder and is more decisive. He is much more of a leader and has good grasp of public finance, business and social services. He just may get the edge.
    of course if Bajans go for the Bees I hope we have a strong Opposition.


  24. @Watching 10:08 a.m.:

    I agree totally. The Eager 11 ministers and public blaming Stuart but it is not his fault. The DLP ministers are just not good enough. They are seen as untrustworthy and incompetent AND vision-less. Ronald Jones runningbehind football while the Alexandra saga was burning and all he cud do is holler hard and try to protect his friend. Byer Suckoo, Todd, Lowe, Blackett, Best all of them just a big bunch of waste. Michael Lashley and Sinckler are two tricksters alike, they like the camera and alot of whatthey say when you investigate is a bunch of lies especially Sinckler who can NEVER walk in Freundel’s shoes. IT IS NOT FREUNDEL fault he is being made a scapegoat.

    The BLP ministers on the other hand are known to be untrustworthy also butthey have vison and are competent so given these two choices we will go for the lesser of the two evils and the DLP is the lesser of teh two evils.


  25. @Prodigal Son

    no maybe the garbage truck, though, bearing in mind the nonsense you talk. I wont reply to you, so dont bother

    Hereโ€™s the real garbage, posting comments on one thread under the name Prodigal Son and then posting the identical comments under the pseudonym โ€œApollo 13โ€ as you did a few weeks ago, Is that your modus operandi?

    You donโ€™t have to respond to that either.


  26. @Fosforos 6.05pm
    You say Bajans used to cringe when OSA spoke and he used bad grammar?Both points are such bold untruths!!OSA is a highly qualified economist who as a very young UWI graduate scholar in Jamaica was snatched up by the Jamaican Government of the day to head its Bauxite portfolio.Further OSA returned to Barbados in the early 80’s and lectured at UWI Cave Hill in the Social Sciences faculty.I have no idea where your nonsense originated.OSA spoke standard English very well indeed.He joked to students that when he saw the word ‘statistics’ coming up he knew he was going to have a challenge with it.A stammer is nothing to be ashamed of.What might be said is that with the BLP having so many stars in its firmament in the 90’s,(indeed always)many were surprised when the party committee put him forward as the candidate most likely to lead the party successfully in the next election and in the position of Prime Minister.Barring unforseen circumstances,OSA will return the BLP to victory whenever the bell is rung,this year or early next year.


  27. @zack

    you see how easy it was for me to shut you up now go ahead answer me you dumb twirt you come up in here calling people names who the h..l do you think you are .the pen indeed is mighter than the sword guess what i learnt that from Wickham!.


  28. Old onion bags;
    What’s up with the alexandra thing? What happened today?


  29. Imagine many people telling Stuart about his big words and Stuart drop teh words “phlegmatic serenity” on them. Stuart does barely be laughing at wunna. As for that teacher who said she dont understand what Stuart says, maybe you are a teacher at Princess Margaret or St George.

    Now to Stuart who sees himself as a good person and Owen as Barrabas and is of teh view that Bajans will choose him because he is NICE. You are sadly mistaken. Bajans are very selfish and dont-carish and hypocritical, dont think they are going to choose you over Barrabas. They prefer Barrabas once Barrabas is going to put more money in their pockets.


  30. The thread title says “a reason for Stuart to ponder”

    It is clear that he is not pondering any poles or disturbing his serenity. I guess there’s only so much more that can be said here.


  31. Hold on…. one last thing..Has anyone else noticed who has been completely silent on the DLP side since the poll?????


  32. A Citizen @4.44 pm

    If you got the impression that I would like to give the DLP a term I am very sorry for misleading you for it is far from the truth. I think that is bunch is the worse that this country has ever encounter and I hope the last. I will admit that I use to support them previously but as one gets older and start looking at things more objectively I lost all faith in the DLP. You are therefore right that Mr Stuart is the best of the worst. As Caswell said earlier I like a lot of Bajans might hold my nose and vote BLP if I vote at all.


  33. Observing; I haven’t seen anything from any of the the alleged main movers in the eager eleven. Could the game be afoot again?


  34. While you check it out I shall observe ๐Ÿ™‚


  35. “This is indeed the โ€œsilly seasonโ€, I had to look twice to make sure the submission was from โ€œbalanceโ€ instead of โ€œUnbalancedโ€. There is a word for this type of thinking it is called paranoia, if it continues seek professional help”

    i am proud to sat that i have never been a member of any polotical party so ‘paranoia’ would not fit my bill and i hope not yours. i do not expect eveyone on this blog to agree with everything i say but at least my comments are based on facts and free from bias.’.

    Rate This


  36. Prodigal son
    โ€ why did it take nearly five full months for the PM to announce a GG โ€ ?
    it is not the length of time that bothers me prodigal for we a;ll know by now that mr stuart’s decisions come in phases and why shoulld we expect the appointment to the post of governor general to be any different. it is true that the post of governor general is only symbolic and there is lttle work to be done but i was concerned when i read that mr belgrave is 81.shiver me timbers but i really must wonder if thoughtfulness went into the decision to appoint a governor-general in the twilight of his years. ” the days of our life are threescore years and ten and though men be so strong that they go to fourscore years yet is their life nothing but sorrow for soon passeth it away and there are gone” mr belgrave is a very fine gentleman, i wish him well as he embarks on this new journey in service to the nation.


  37. “Be careful, I have taken a lot of abuse for coming to the same conclusions.Letโ€™s face it, Stuart is not the ideal leader, but who is? Yes, he is slow to act, but I am yet to hear anybody say that he is a crook. Quite frankly, I prefer an honest man who is slow to make decisions to a speedy crook any day”

    do not forget bro franklyn that mr stuart is not seasoned in yet and obviously should/would be loathe to do anything which would invite criticism about corruptio. perhaps we need to give him some time in the office before we can judge him on that score. remember that mr arthur was not accused of corruption until his last term.


  38. @balance

    do not forget bro franklyn that mr stuart is not seasoned in yet and obviously should/would be loathe to do anything which would invite criticism about corruptio. perhaps we need to give him some time in the office before we can judge him on that score. remember that mr arthur was not accused of corruption until his last term.

    What a disingenuous statement to make. One can only judge a man based on what is there to judge.


  39. Stuart and the DLP are running a country not a 2*2 house. How can we seriously talk about giving them time and a chance to do what is right. The country is similar to the human body. Would any of you give a doctor time to get it right on you if you knew he wasnt competent?

    As I have said before, Stuart is a scapegoat. The real poor performers are the ministers he inherited. Even David Thompson tried reshuffling his cabinet several times because he knew how incompetent they were.

  40. old onion bags Avatar
    old onion bags

    @ Check-it
    Re Alexandra……some teachers just had a much needed opp to exhale…… in light of what’s prevailing polls n all.

  41. old onion bags Avatar
    old onion bags

    @Str8
    The Eager 11 ministers and public blaming Stuart but it is not his fault. The DLP ministers are just not good enough. They are seen as untrustworthy and incompetent AND vision-less.
    *********************************
    The Eager 11 should be accorded some privilege, don’t you think..remember they offered the leader a chance to step down.
    When the company fails …the CEO is to be responsible….(even for workers errs)..don’t forget.The buck stops there.

  42. Observing (and awaiting the bell) Avatar
    Observing (and awaiting the bell)

    “The real poor performers are the ministers he inherited.”

    This is further argument for stamping that mandate back in December 2010. Shape the cabinet in your image with your vision. David was/is a strong advocate for that. If you work with what you were left, you have to take what they have left to give. Also, has anyone ever heard FS speak in public praise and adulation of any of his ministers??


  43. @Observing
    Freundel is neither inflated by praise or deflated by criticism. He takes both with phlegmatic serenity. We can extrapolate he is not too concerned with his ministers’ performance. then again they have not performed.


  44. Observing, re. your 7.50 am post.

    Its a leadership style that is quite strange.

    Some of the earlier prime ministers insisted on fawning respect from their ministers but could never be said to have dissed them in public. In public they were praised even if undeservedly.

    FS has a different modus operandi. He indirectly disses them and I can’t remember seeing anywhere where he praised any of them.

    Another characteristic that might throw some spanners in the works.

    Have you also noted a very strong “I am always right” type of personality showing through?


  45. @old onions
    why wasnt Principal Jeff Broomes fired then and he is teh CEO of the school. tek dat.

  46. old onion bags Avatar
    old onion bags

    @ Str8
    Because of…… Stuart..tek dat


  47. @Observing

    This is further argument for stamping that mandate back in December 2010. Shape the cabinet in your image with your vision
    ***********

    As I said before you are usually astute in your analysis, but youโ€™ve dropped the ball once again. Stuartโ€™s selection was one of compromise after the Parliamentary group was unable to reach agreement on the contenders for the job (Sinckler and Estwick) who were vying for the crown. In accepting the compromise Stuart implicitly agreed to the demand not to upset the apple cart but to maintain the status quo.

    Politics is often about compromise, you donโ€™t believe me? Look no further than Owen and Mia.

  48. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    You see one of the reasons why I like Freundel: he always teaches me something. Prior to his “phlegmatic serenity” remarks, I was only aware of one meaning of the word, “phlegm”. Thank you Freundel!


  49. @Sargeant
    “In accepting the compromise Stuart implicitly agreed to the demand not to upset the apple cart but to maintain the status quo”

    the “status quo” was a party popular with independents and young people. Who spoke to a vision and philosophy of working for all, protecting the needy, communicating with the people, being accountable and transparent and holding the flames of those who had robbed and pillaged us prior to 2008 to the fire.

    I can now ask. Has the status quo remained?
    Is Stuart’s vision Thompson’s vision?
    Is the party of 2008 that of 1994? Is the party of 2012 that of 2008?
    Are the team operations in 2012 the same as those in 2010?

    If the answers to any of these are no, then, Stuart MUST (should have) led his team in the way HE chooses to. If what we’re seeing IS his the way he choose to, then the electorate will make a final determination on that.

    Also, if the leader of a country in a time of crisis which necessitates action , communication and effectiveness cannot place his chess pieces on the board in the positions that he wants and needs them simply for the sake of “compromise” and not upsetting an apple cart, then my view of that leader would be severely damaged. I hope for Freundel’s sake that you are not correct. That would make his lot even worse than it is right now.


  50. What a disingenuous statement to make. One can only judge a man based on what is there to judge.”
    call the statment what you like but it is factual and relevant to the discussion of allegations of corruption against mr arthur in his last term and holding up mr stuart as squeaky clean in his first term of office. i never accused mr stuart of anything other than incompetent leadership and his frequent fauxpas. i am on record as saying mr stuart has proven to be an approachable politician. he can get my vote before the pompous(do not accuse me of disingenuousity now )mr lynch.mr thompson captured the imagination of the floating vote in haggat hall with his promise to fight and stamp out corrption in politics. now,the clico scandal now on the backburner seemsthat he was not so clean after all.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading