Submitted by Charles Knighton
The editorial in the Nation of May 25th What shall become of the Palestinians reaches the conclusion that “all this talk of peace in the Middle East for over 30 years is nothing more than a sham“, laying blame for this state of affairs solely on Israel’s refusal to withdraw to its 1967 borders, borders which Israel asserts would invite attack from its Arab neighbours. Your editorial [Nation] suggests Israel has conjured up this rationale from whole cloth, as its true motivation is to maintain control of the fertile Jordan Valley.
The 1967 borders are essentially the same borders mandated by the United Nations with the creation of the Jewish state in 1948.ย From 1948 to 1967 Israel was set upon by Arab armies, each time repulsing these onslaughts while maintaining their precarious but legally mandated borders. Had that been the end of the Arab aggressions not only against Israel but a United Nations mandate as well, the currently contested lands would have remained under Arab control, including the fertile Jordan Valley.
The surprise Arab attack initiating the 1967 Yom Kippur War, though again resulting in an Arab defeat, forced Israel to ponder the strategic weaknesses of its mandated border, which leads us to the currently disputed territory Israel only then occupied as a buffer.ย It is ironic to say the least that the Arab world now desires a United Nations’ mandate defining borders for a Palestinian state when the same body’s mandate for a Jewish state was ignored.
Though certainly not faultless in its actions over the years, Israel has always been clear that a return to its 1967 borders rests solely on the willingness of its Arab neighbours to guarantee its right to exist peacefully, a guarantee which has never been forthcoming.ย The issue has never been about the 1967 border but rather the existence of Israel behind any border at all. Thus, talk of peace in the Middle East is indeed a sham, but not for the reason your editorial alleges.





The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.