The Non-Jailable Class: Bad Laws, Corrupt Tyrants And Legal Fraud – Justifying The Protection And Safehaven For The Perpetrators Of Genocide, Extraordinary Rendition, Dangerous Oligarchs And Arms Sales To Evil Regimes

Submitted by Terence Blackett

Bad laws are the worst form of tyranny – Sir Edmund Burke

“In 494 B.C., the plebeians threatened to leave Rome and set up their own independent state (concilium plebis). What the plebeians did was to literally create a state within a state…” This was due in part to corruption being rife. Morality had hit an all time low. The Caesars and the Senate ruled with a rod of iron – life was hard, “nasty, brutish and short.”

With the advent of the 19th century, French post-Enlightenment philosopher, economist and statesman Frederic Bastiat in his landmark discourse on “The Law” cites that “each of us has a natural right – from God – to defend his person, his liberty, and his property. These are the (3) basic requirements of life and the preservation of any one of them is completely dependent upon the preservation of the other (2).”

Bastiat believed that “self-preservation and self-development are common aspirations among all people. And if everyone enjoyed the unrestricted use of his faculties and the free disposition of the fruits of his labor, social progress would be ceaseless, uninterrupted, and unfailing. But there is also another tendency that is common among people. When they can, they wish to live and prosper at the expense of others…” He believed that “bad laws” perverted and corrupted by dubious individuals impeded the functional aspects of society.

Bastiat opines that “unfortunately, law by no means confines itself to its proper functions. And when it has exceeded its proper functions, it has not done so merely in some inconsequential and debatable matters. The law has gone further than this; it has acted in direct opposition to its own purpose. The law has been used to destroy its own objective: It has been applied to annihilating the justice that it was supposed to maintain; to limiting and destroying rights which its real purpose was to respect. The law has placed the collective force at the disposal of the unscrupulous who wish, without risk, to exploit the person, liberty, and property of others. It has converted plunder into a right, in order to protect plunder. And it has converted lawful defense into a crime, in order to punish lawful defense. How has this perversion of the law been accomplished? And what have been the results? The law has been perverted by the influence of two entirely different causes: stupid greed and false philanthropy.”

A common opinion held is that Western 1st world “democracies” are the worst forms of political and judicial tyranny that have ever existed – a throw-back to an era where the virtues of the Roman Empire were shrouded in banality, corruption, decadence and blind myopia. So as we witness the chilled winds of change which are blowing across the land – it shows that it is possible to eliminate the tyrant-person or the group of tyrants because it is more visible who is behind the formulation of bad laws, corrupt political practices and economic subversiveness. Though Western “democracies” are based on countless number of groups of tyrants (stratified in geological formation), layered in bureaucratic levels of complexity – virtually impossible to unravel and who are constantly creating new bad laws that are protecting the interest of particular group of tyrants (an ELITE* class) of individuals who according to the rules of MONOPOLY have a “get out jail card” for every form of plunder they evince upon the poor, the vulnerable, the disenfranchised and those without a voice.

These evil bastards include perpetrators of the Jewish Holocaust in Germany which go back as far as the mid 1940’s – inculcating others which include those from the ethnic cleansing of Rwanda, Bosnia, DRC, Myanmar and other diabolical regimes around the world including Colombian terrorists and drug dealers, illegal arms trade merchants, Mexican drug lords, Russian mafia oligarchs, high-powered members of the Yakuza, notwithstanding, elements of the Arab royal families who have all found safehaven (for their stolen wealth & assets) in places like the EU, Britain, Canada and America. Most recently, Gaddafi’s son who had most favored persona status in the United Kingdom – owning a £11 million mansion in one of the most exclusive postcodes in the country and now a domicile for squatters who do not trust the British system to do the right thing.

A damnable lamentation is how these countries (paragons of a purported democratic ideal) can house, give sanctuary and in some cases grant witness protection and immunity from prosecution from the dastardly and inhumane crimes against humanity, against the person of the poor and a callous disregard for the plunder and evisceration of the innocent.

So we are stuck in a pseudo-representative tenet of democracy where a mere 25% or less of our elected individuals who represent the people – passing any law (often bad legislation) that this small group of individuals wish to impose on a rest of the population of the country – a form of minority tyranny which subjugates the majority and tries to strangle dissent.

In the book Rules of Order by a military engineer suggest that “there is a special rule on the subject, the quorum of every assembly is a majority of all the members of the assembly. But whenever a society has any permanent existence, it is usual to adopt a much smaller number, the quorum being often less than one-twentieth of its members; this becomes a necessity in most large societies, where only a small fraction of the members are ever present at a meeting.” It is then easy to understand why we are in such a “democratic” mess.

Back in 1913, a small group of US elected representatives manipulated the result of voting as they wished and passed the most debilitating laws in American history. So “just to be safe, the Federal Reserve Bill was put before Congress shortly before Christmas, 1913, when many Congressmen were already at home with their families for the holiday…” Since 1913 the amount of bad laws that have been passed is overwhelming and constantly growing.

A recent Rolling Stone article, posed a few questions – “why isn’t Wall Street in jail?” Where do these folks find a “get out of jail card?” The article suggested that “a veritable mountain of evidence indicates that when it comes to Wall Street, the justice system not only sucks at punishing financial criminals, it has actually evolved into a highly effective mechanism for protecting financial criminals. This institutional reality has absolutely nothing to do with politics or ideology – it takes place no matter who’s in office or which party is in power”. It went on to say that “the SEC and the Justice Department have evolved into a bizarre species of social surgeon serving this NONJAILABLE* class, expert not at administering punishment and justice, but at finding and removing criminal responsibility from the bodies of the accused.” The same thing exist in Britain and others EU countries.

So the top perverted tyrants in these western countries do not kill and do not physically torture ordinary people (only rendition is sanctioned for “ENEMIES OF THE STATE” and the freedom fighters who want to live and practice their way of life and religion). Assassinations are directed most of the time against high ranking slaves in banking and in government.

The “terrorist” attacks in Spain and London and also the Polish presidential plane crash are situations in which perverted tyrants killed many innocent ordinary people. Examples of how sophisticated the assassins that are hired by the money issuers to kill an insubordinate banker by the name of Alfred Herrhausen who was killed, and why? “Because he was the only banker, and the only person outside of ourselves, who proposed a crash program for the economic development of Poland, using the Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau, meaning to go outside the condition of the IMF system. And he also demanded a debt reorganization of the Third World. And he was killed, as a clear warning to the German establishment that they should absolutely not dare to step outside of the system…”

The RAF planned their attack well, planting their bomb in a satchel on a bicycle parked beside the route. The bomb was linked to an infrared beam, which terrorists posing as workmen had set up across the road. The terrorists allowed the lead car through, and then activated the beam. When Herrhausen’s car broke the beam, the bomb went off. It consisted of ten kilos of explosive and a two-kilo copper plate, aimed so that it would strike the passenger seat… aimed so that it would strike the passenger seat” which means it has to be a fraction of a second delay because from the front of Herrhausen’s car to the passenger seat is around two meters and car was travelling 50 km per hour. So the RAF had that kind of extremely sophisticated assassination technology… Herrhausen was not only powerful; he was perhaps the most progressive banker around. He had ideas which were sensible and realistic, but much too radical for some. Furthermore, he was charismatic, attractive, articulate, and outspoken all of which adds up to a man who could have made a difference, such men, for darker minds are dangerous… All highest level power groups, whether nations or other centres of the highest power maintain the capability to assassinate selected individuals when they feel it is necessary. This capability is somewhat similar to what our society maintains under the name of an “executioner”, “hangman”, or other. From that perspective it is a fundamental task of the source of power…”

Mark Pittman – the first person to ever sue the Federal Reserve (along with his employer Bloomberg News) according to some reports was assassinated. He was 52 years old in relatively good health. But according to his employer – “Pittman suffered from heart-related illnesses. The precise cause of his death wasn’t known.” So like Dr. David Kelly, the coroner’s edict was the final word on the situation.

If we have learnt nothing in recent months from the political Tsunami in North Africa and in Arab countries is how to stop those highly sophisticated and extremely ruthless so-called “democratic” tyrants. We have to dismantle the process by stopping the creation of bad laws but to also eliminate already existing “democratically” bad laws passed. In order to do it – the laws to pass a new law have to be drastically modified. Robert’s Rules of Order has to be fundamentally changed. Instead of the win-lose voting for a new law – we must enforce the 3rd Alternative – the “win-win” solution by the power of synergic consensus described in details by Timothy Wilken in his book “ORTEGRITY” which states that “the power of synergic consensus rests on finding the third alternative. A major fact about human performance mental or physical is that it is greatest when the individual is winning… It is veto power that forces the third alternative – the win-win solution. It is synergic relationship that unlocks human potential. This is the relationship that eliminates all conflict… Japanese corporations are presently 150% more efficient and productive than American corporations. Those companies who choose to restructure as Ortegrities could experience an increase in efficiency and productivity of 1000%…”

This one fundamental change of laws to pass new laws based on veto power followed immediately by negotiation to find the third win-win alternative will gradually eliminate all tyrannies in the World. In already existing laws the veto power in the legal system rest with the duty of the twelve (not less) randomly selected jurors particularly that – the jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the facts in controversy… “Yet to this day, trial jurors retain the right to veto, or “nullify” bad laws, though they are rarely told this by the courts. Prosecutors and judges try to exclude people from serving on juries who admit knowing they can judge the law, or who have doubts about the justice of the law. This destroys the protections jurors were supposed to be able to invoke on behalf of fellow citizens against unjust prosecutions: how can our right to a trial by an impartial jury be met if those with any qualms about the law are excluded from serving…”

The time has surely come for a new awakening!!!

32 thoughts on “The Non-Jailable Class: Bad Laws, Corrupt Tyrants And Legal Fraud – Justifying The Protection And Safehaven For The Perpetrators Of Genocide, Extraordinary Rendition, Dangerous Oligarchs And Arms Sales To Evil Regimes

  1. Hey, Terence … maybe we could get Chloe at CTU to open up a socket into the tyrants’ mainframe until Jack Bauer arrives to whack them.

    Oh, dear Lord … None of this post makes any sense whatsoever. It’s just a random collection of arbitrary notions lacking even the slightest sense of cogency. Reading it is like watching a blind person with one hand trying to operate a pinball machine.

    And it’s about as grammatical as a pinball machine. Terence: if you don’t know what the word “evince” means, don’t use it. Don’t use words that you don’t understand. You just make yourself look foolish.

    Direct question. The post says “The ‘terrorist’ attacks in Spain and London … are situations in which perverted tyrants killed many innocent ordinary people.”

    Sorry? WHO put the bombs on the trains in Madrid and London? Try to be specific. Who?

  2. TMB:

    Two questions:
    1) what acronym does your RAF stand for?
    2) would you include NYC, given its similarity, with London and Madrid in your theory?

  3. There is nothing new under the sun, different time period, same old Sinful heart; why is this so, because:

    “The heart (desires, intent,) is decietful above ALL things. And desperately wicked; Who can know it” (ALL, Only God!) (Jer. 17:9, Emphasis added.

    TMB, there is no time for change, can’t happen, won’t happen, the time-table for the cataclysmic End, is around the corner, you know this!

  4. Thank you for this brilliant piece.

    Whereas We, the many Free-thinking and Peace-loving People of these Lands on this Earth have elected, of our own Free Wills, to unite and stand against plagues of War, Injustice, Corruption, Greed, Tyrrany, Oppression, and Untruths perpetually cast upon Us by few;

    And whereas We shall no longer tolerate the perversions of our collective systems of Governance and Justice by Tyrants and their agents of deceit, We adhere to the following mutual principles of civil Humanity:

    Keeping with our inherent moralities, We demand our Freedom and Justice for us One and All.

    Even as we are threatened and intimidated, tempted, bribed and coerced, We shall not succumb to apathy or willful blindness.

    Too many have already been senselessly killed; in the name of so-called ‘security’; We refuse to condone or support in any way, preemptive wars and occupation under any circumstances, and shall take Pity on, but shun those do.

    How long must peace-loving People be perversely manipulated to bear arms against and destroy one and other? Humans’ inherent desire is Peace – those who do are warmongers are atypical and unfit for civil society – moreover, they are absolutely unfit to govern or lead.

    Each Man, Woman and Child on this Earth are Sister and Brother – We will no longer be divided by that which makes Us different, but united by that which We hold in common as Brethren.

    For centuries, wars have been waged and blood spilled for freedom, yet after so much carnage we have less freedom today than did our forebearers.

    Using all means necessary and available, We the People will see sent into government, not option ‘A’ or ‘B’ (more of the same) – but candidates who are independent of organized affiliation and corruption, and who will be accountable to the electorate, and not to the oligarchies we despise and will call out from this day forth.

    Christians, Agnostics, Atheists, Jews, Spirituals, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, or members of any other Faith or Creed will no longer subscribe to propaganda and organized teachings which are contrary to common good and teachings we all know to be right; we will celebrate which we share – an aversion to evil and love for all things good.

    Keeping to these Fundamentals, which we hold to be true, We the People shall resist with Civil Disobedience, tyranny and injustice in all of its ugly forms and will expose such abominations in order that they be known to all good people and no longer kept hidden.

    Until there is Justice for all – We shall not expect Peace.

    Peace and free living are rights for All to share.


  5. @ JJB

    By the way, GREAT WEBSITE* and fantastic INFO….

    Sorry about the RANT* in my piece as it has personal resonance given something that is CURRENTLY* occurring in OZ with some business colleagues and how we have to fight tooth ‘n’ nail to get redress for “BAD LAWS” and so-called “elected” tyrants who wield power as they please – often with no regard to least vulnerable in society while giving “SANCTUARY” to nasty SCUM*, evildoers and wolves in sheep’s clothing…

    As a fellow “soldier” waging war on many sociopolitical fronts – the time is surely coming when “the awakening” shall come (and folks will be forced to choose to take sides – one or the other)…

    Meantime, it’s not easy being accused in many quarters of having an”ANARCHIST* mindset – someone “HELL-BENT” on destruction, demolition and dilapidation of the system when the reality is all too different…

    Even if that was accepted consensus from those who “TRULY” know my deeper thought processes – it wouldn’t matter any ‘ole way because the “SYSTEM” is already set up to “SELF-DESTRUCT” without my help or anyone else’s for that matter…

    IF? the prophecies are “TRUE” – (and I believe they are) complete annihilation is an inevitability regardless of what anyone says (for the inherent nature of men’s heart is ONLY* continually)…

    What we “WORK” toward is for the “SLEEPING VIRGINS” to awaken out of their stupor and realize what time it is ( a dirty job but somebody’s gotta’ do it)…

    So my dear BRUV* – KEEP UP THE GOOD FIGHT!!!



  6. DAVID @ BU


    Thanks again and be blessed!!!

  7. @ ZOE
    “TMB, there is no time for change, can’t happen, won’t happen, the time-table for the cataclysmic End, is around the corner, you know this!”


    No one can’t argue with that!!!

  8. Hey, Terence. Sorry it took so long to get back to you. Did you get those coordinates I sent to you on your IPad? The e-maps and everything?

    Chloe at CTU has managed to open up a socket into the tyrants’ mainframe so we’re picking up some chatter, but CTU has to go into lock-down. Jack Bauer’s been abducted and CTU’s security might be compromised.

    Looks like Jack’s out of action.

    As far as we know right now, Jack’s being held in a dungeon by a shadowy cabal of Jewish Catholics and JFK assassins, in league with Mexican drug lords and dissident escapees from Area 51, supported by the people who are trying to eliminate the people who have the PROOF* that those planes on 9/11 were holograms designed by a Papist-Mossad-Freemason conglomerate financed by a shadowy group of former UFO-abductees and the so-called Rothschild “Illuminati”, in coordination with the Church of Latter Day Saints and the so-called MAFIA* (which we all know is really a front for the New World Order), cooperating with the so-called military-industrial complex (MIC) in their black helicopters and sometimes their Black helicopters, the same MIC that planted AIDS in Africa and is STILL* putting fluoride into your water so that you can easily be manipulated by the Federal Reserve System and the Great Sea Lords of Atlantis, still riding on their unicorns, in cahoots with the Elders of Zion, whose FEARTHQUAKE* machine (built by Wall Street, in tandem with the Bilderberg group of Mormon Catholics on orders from the Elders) ruined Haiti and is mercilessly deployed to keep us in subjugation until the End of Days, which is happening, if you didn’t already know it, at 1:25 pm UST on 14 October this year—think about it, Terence. Just think about it. Think about the perfect Biblical symbolism of that date, and how it is in perfect consonance with the Mayan and Aztec calendars. Wasn’t 14 October the day on which the Saviour came unto us for the first time, the day of His conception? Is it not said in the Tibetan Book of the Dead that 14 October shall be unto you as a dark cloud, merciless in its majesty? Is it not said in the many writings of Azlocztl, that freedom fighter against neo-imperialist Hispanic oppression, that “the mid-noon of mid-October in the year of the twelve (12) SHALL bring succor to my brethren for there shall come a cataclysm beyond you”?

    And the Blessed Lord Jesus (call me “Jeez”, but call me “Eric” if you want to [Revelations, 23: 17]) Christ, did show unto us, oh verily, how to write actual fucking sentences that make sense and that don’t bore your readers into the wall before they’ve even got half-way to the full stop.

    Terence: we estimate it will take Jack Bauer between four and six minutes (or until the next commercial break) to whack these evildoers and change the history of the universe. Try to hang on till then. Then you’ll be safe, okay?

    In the meantime, Terence, we have a few questions. Actually, we have a vast number of questions about your somewhat idiosyncratic and louche sense of grammar, and your use of particular words, but we’ll limit ourselves to a few.

    First, Terence, you mention the attacks on trains in Madrid and London. Tell us who (or, as you would say, **WHO!!**??) planted the bombs on the trains in Madrid and London? Let’s get some clarity on this matter. Allow yourself to be clear. You suggest that 247 people (191 in Madrid and 56 in London) were murdered by “perverted tyrants … hired by the money issuers”. Okay. So, who are the perverted tyrants, hired by the money issuers, who murdered 247 commuters in Madrid and London? Who are they? Please tell us. Please be clear and please be explicit.

    Second, Terence, please explain why, when you refer to the terrorist attacks in Madrid and London, you put the word “terrorist” between quotation marks. Did you do that because you believe that the attacks were not perpetrated by terrorists? Did you do it because you thought they were perpetrated by people who are not terrorists? Why the quotation marks? Please be clear and please be explicit.

    Third, Terence, please explain the reasoning behind the explicit connection you make between the murder of 247 people in Madrid (March 2004) and London (July 2005), and the murder of Herr Herrhausen (November 1989). Are you suggesting that the Baader-Meinhof gang and the murderers of Madrid and London are somehow being directed by the same boss?

    Fourth, Terence, can you explain to your readers what you mean in your fifth paragraph by “blind myopia”? Can someone who is blind have myopia? Can someone who only has myopia be blind? Or did you just stick the two words together without really thinking much about their meanings, because you thought the phrase as a whole sounded good to you? These are the kinds of questions that any reasonable reader of your writings might pose to you, Terence.

    Fifth, Terence, can you tell us what you mean at the opening of your sixth paragraph when you refer to “these evil bastards”? Your previous five paragraphs have not made this clear, and all your ensuing paragraphs similarly fail to clarify the matter. Can you tell us who the “evil bastards” are? Please tell us. Please be clear and please be explicit.

    Sixth, Terence, you claim at the start of your fifth paragraph that “A common opinion held is that Western 1st world ‘democracies’ are the worst forms of political and judicial tyranny that have ever existed”. Can you render that sentence in the active voice? I’m sure we can all remember, when we were seven or eight years old, being taught that good, English, expository prose avoids the passive voice whenever possible. In contrast to, say, the Romance languages (with which I’m sure you’re familiar, Terence) in English the use of the active voice is a hallmark of clarity, comprehension and reader-accessibility. So tell us, Terence: “a common opinion held” is an opinion commonly held by precisely whom? Who (or, as you would say, *WHO*!!?) are the people who generally hold the view that western democracies are “the worst forms of political and judicial tyranny that have ever existed”. Please tell us. Please be clear and please be explicit.

    Seventh … Well, Terence, I haven’t run out of space but I’ve certainly run out of time, so I won’t continue with the sixth, seventh … fourteenth … thirty-fifth question that your post raises. I’ll be content with your answers to these very few that I’ve raised.

    Thanks in advance for your clarifying reply, and best wishes to you.


    ACTIVIST MEMBERS from all walks of life in

    THE CAMPAIGN PHILOSOPHY is spread worldwide by its members. Campaign philosophy supported by academics, doctors and judges (U.S. & U.K.)….

    Join in the Campaign by downloading and distributing the free posters and educational pamphlets…

    Contact us by e-mail today for your free membership and privileges…


    Consider some of the following breaches of common law and Constitution to which modern government resorts, in order to enforce its money-motivated inequitable statutes:-

    Today, to ensure the enforcement of whatever unjust legislation government passes, a government-contrived legal obligation bans attorneys, solicitors, lawyers and barristers from presenting evidence which exonerates defendants, if it “disputes the law.” Judges forbid the accused likewise.

    In an unforgivable meretricious act of obsequious criminality, for pay, the lawyer adopts the perjury and subreption* of not presenting evidence which exonerates defendants…

    *Definition. subreption: concealment of evidence; the perjurious procuring of an advantage by concealing the truth.

    Over years, literally billions accrue to law firms’ personnel. In order to ply their lucrative trade (one can no longer dignify this morbid masquerade by calling it a ‘profession’), nowadays lawyers blithely abdicate responsibility and forsake honesty. For gain, lawyers perjuriously consent to this odious denial of the duty to find The Whole Truth. They compound their malfeasance by also tacitly concealing the Constitutional Jurors’ Rights and Duty to judge the law and to find the Verdict according to the Juror’s conscience.

    We point out this crime, this disgrace, this contemptible species of inhumanity. There is no defence to the charge of lawyers acquiescing to the denial of their duty to find The Whole Truth and their profiting from, and being party to, the abuse and imprisonment of innumerable masses of innocent citizens. Consider the charges:

    Fact 1: “Lawyers cannot present defence or evidence which exonerates defendants if it disputes the legality of the law.”

    Fact 2: “Lawyers must abide by the court’s authority whenever judges rule out exonerative evidence.”

    In shameful meek obedience, lawyers do not dispute the ‘law’ even when its enforcement is manifest injustice. Where the law is unjust and defendants are innocent of any crime (no mens rea), lawyers nevertheless ‘advise’ people to plead “guilty” and make plea bargains, rather than their pleading Not Guilty and electing to go to a Trial by Jury. This comprises one major reason why Trials by Jury have become so infrequent. It also results in the West’s largest prison population of all time, consisting principally of harmless citizens innocent of any crime; while the real crimes go unsolved and largely unchallenged; and the accountable progenitors of crime and their servitors, the hardened dangerous criminals, go “scot” free…

    (See Democracy Defined Campaign Philosophy Page 2; the section on mens rea, malice aforethought, criminal intent, “Guilty?” or “Not Guilty?” Wrongful Prosecution; Amnesty & Restitution. See: PROHIBITION: THE PROGENITOR OF CRIME; Part Six of THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204, which has a Foreword by an official Adviser to U.S. government and is endorsed by academics, doctors [of a variety of disciplines] and judges [U.S. & U.K.]).

    The educated people who comprise the ‘legal profession’ are, by their acquiescence and continued participation in the unlawful, tyrannical, perverted processes of today, more to blame than any other group in society for the destruction of the Constitutional Justice System; and for all the inevitably ensuing totalitarian injustice that results therefrom: the enactment and prosecution of ex parte, money-motivated statutes; the abuse of innocent citizens; wrongful penalization; and the mass incarcerations at the highest per capita rate in history.

    It is not possible for anyone who is remotely au courant with the Illegality of the Status Quo, to deem as ‘true’, and as ‘counsel’ the word of these people who collude in and profit from the widespread enforcement of injustices against innocent citizens.

    In myriad cases, defendants would fare better by dismissing their lawyer and presenting a straightforward courtroom defence and the exonerative evidence for themselves, which is their right.

    If a significant number of defendants were to take up this option of pleading Not Guilty, electing to go for a Trial by Jury and presenting their own defence, then the legal profession would either have to put up with losing the greater proportion of their phenomenally lucrative and easy paydays—or press hard for restoration of Constitutional Trial by Jury in which juries judge the law, and defendants and lawyers are obliged, in seeking The Whole Truth, to present such evidence as reveals an unfounded nature, inequity, venal* motive, of any modern statutes, and hence the crimes per se of the acts of their enforcement.

    *Definition. venal: corruptly mercenary; (able to be) bought over; open to bribery.

    With defendants presenting defence for themselves, thus withholding from lawyers a major source of income, the legal professionals would have their prime, perhaps only, motivating impulse, i.e. money, compelling them to strive—for once on the side of Truth and Justice—for RESTORATION of the Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury Justice System.

    In the face of extant modern tyranny, state crime and corruption, honest members must forthwith free themselves from dependence on income from, and all association with, the scribes and pharisees of the ‘legal profession’. The correct course for every man or woman of probity, the only honourable way of proceeding for members of the profession, is to resist in wrath and indignation, and to refuse to accept the gains so ill-gotten; and campaign (with us) to right the wrongs.

    Insincere, gravely wrong ‘advice’ and mendacity swiftly become the inscrutable, smooth practised habit of those who, for money, accept that they cannot tell the truth. Controlled by courts (judges) under threat of penalty, and as willing, paid participants in this massive Crime Against Humanity, today’s lawyers cannot give candid counsel nor veracious defence; let alone be trusted to educate people truthfully about the principal Safeguard of Democracy: Annulment-by-Jury (or Jury Nullification) in the Trial by Jury.

    The lawyer’s is the training which prepares the person for “the bench”—the judge who takes his pay from the government only as long as he or she reliably enforces the money-motivated politicians’ inequitable deceptions dissimulated under the guise of ‘law’.

    Today, to ensure the enforcement of the said inequitable (and therefore illegal) ‘laws’, judges knowingly exclude exonerative evidence, including expert documentary, legal, academic, scientific, medical, philosophical, and that which is based on grounds of equity, and tell jurors to consider only that evidence which he or she (the judge) allows ! (See THE REPORT, ISBN 9781902848204.)

    Thus, today, judges invalidate even their own pretence that “jurors try matters of fact.” By dictating the laws of evidence, that is, what evidence the jury may and may not hear, and by ruling how jurors should weigh such evidence as the court chooses to permit them to hear, judges corruptly arrange and dictate the conclusion, the Verdict, to which juries must arrive.

    This criminal tampering by judges produces innumerable false guilty ‘verdicts’, penalization and abuse of innocent citizens, and millions of man-years’ wrongful incarceration.

    Thanks to:


    By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor, Veterans Today

    This week, most members of congress, 100% of the new “Tea Party,” swore allegiance to the State of Israel. To those of us at Veterans Today, we have a problem with this. We have never been all that enthusiastic about Congress in the first place. They are a gutless bunch who feather their own nests, finance their campaigns with laundered drug money and have turned Washington into a modern day Gomorrah, a city of rent boys and call girls.

    We have a few issues to pick with Israel.

    There is no way any loyal member of the United States military or veteran of its services is likely to “kiss and make up” with Israel until we receive an official apology for the attack on the USS Liberty. Even the “official” veterans organizations, generally a gutless bunch made up of the same spineless sycophants as congress, have spoken up on this one.

    Our next issue is 9/11. We know Israel was involved in a major way though there is no way Israel alone could have ordered NORAD to ground its planes. We know members of all key committees in Congress were given a “top secret” briefing on 9/11 and told the following things:

    * The World Trade Center was destroyed, not by planes but because of a “national security issue” in order to “save lives.”
    * The attack on the Pentagon was not the hijacked aircraft claimed but a different cause that is “classified.”
    * The subsequent attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq were necessary for the US to maintain control of energy resources to prevent economic collapse.
    * Israel “assisted” the United States on 9/11 and may “appear” culpable but was not.

    These things are childish lies, of course. The perverts, cowards and gullible rubes that make up congress, one of the most corrupt institutions on earth, were beaming with self importance, having been briefed on a great conspiracy. After all, many members of congress went to college, some to law school, and are much more deserving and certainly much more important than “normal people.”

    We call this condition “malignant narcissism.”

    We believe there is reasonable proof that the State of Israel was clearly involved in the planning and execution of the 9/11 attack on the United State as part of a conspiracy involving rogue members of our military and intelligence community working with a cabal within the executive branch that may not have included the President of the United States but, in all certainty, nearly everyone around him.

    We are privately aware that top members of the Democratic Party are in total agreement with this assessment, a not-insignificant number along with a dozen or more members of the Republican Party.


    Veterans Today’s last issue with Congress is over the plight of the citizens of the region known as Israel or Palestine or Judea or “Greater Israel.” The news has reports of “West Bank” or “East Jerusalem” housing issues and how upset the United States government “appears” to be from time to time over this issue.

    Let us be clear what these issues are:

    * People are being removed from their homes because of their religion, their property illegally seized and destroyed
    * They are then relocated to areas surrounded by barbed wire, mines and armed guards. We call these places “concentration camps.”
    * In recent years, several thousand members of these relocated families have been killed, some by “accidental shooting” by IDF forces, some by cluster bombs, some by tanks and some crushed by bulldozers. By our estimation, there have been over 300,000 such accidents in total.

    Last week, a majority of members of Congress, including the entire Republican Party, certified that these actions, technically “ethic cleansing,” actions cited by the United Nations on dozens of occasions as violations of basic human rights, were “security issues” for Israel.

    Congress voted funds to pay for these criminal acts. We have a problem with this also.

    We know that every member of Congress is aware that military aid for Israel is only legal because the United States has vetoed sanctions against Israel using their power in the United Nations Security Council on dozens of occasions.

    American weapons are being used to attack civilians in support of a program of ethnic cleansing more aggressive that than perpetrated by the apartheid regime in South Africa.

    Those who support these policies in the American government are morally reprehensible. There is no question of doubt about this issue, the facts are in place and the appropriate human rights agencies are more than clear.

  11. The Money-Motivated Prohibitionists’ Criminal Program: Complete Suppression of The Constitutional Rule of Law.

    Suppression of Jury Nullification, the Constitution and Trial by Jury, is a criminal Prohibitionists’ program. It is crucial to their financial interests for, otherwise, Juries would certainly come to annul the crooked government-corporate revenue and profit protection racket disguised as the ‘War on Drugs’.

    Trial by Jury is correctly perceived by the Owners and politicians as the only real threat to their continuing receipt of the undeserved trillions. This explains why the governments’ beholden employees, the judges, suppress the Jurors’ Nullification Duty, by misinstructing juries that they may not judge the justice, or rather the injustice, of law; and why government wherever possible denies the accused his or her right to a fair Trial by a Jury of equal fellow citizens.

    By common law (and common sense), cultivation, production, trade, sale, import-export, supply, smoking (whatever), eating, drinking, possession and use are all legal. That is, these acts described are innocent in themselves. Under the law, legislation cannot impute ‘malice aforethought’ (i.e. ‘guilt’), to the act itself. However, today, politicians and judiciary driven by the ulterior (concealed; illegal) money-motive, criminally infract the Constitutions and common law by which they are bound, and on a routine basis fabricate ‘offences’ out of things which are not and never will be ‘crimes’.

    In an act as outrageously and blatantly criminal as that of the common gangster or violent robber, at the behest of multi-national corporations whose financial investments and influence interweave through every facet of the socio-economic complex, criminal politicians are destroying the very foundations and fabric of Western democratic civilization.

    Enforcement of the unfounded, perjurious ‘legislation’ by wayward judges, results in fines, incarceration and other abuses of innumerable harmless innocent citizens whose acts are without guilt and of no criminal intent. This results in the West’s largest prison population of all time, consisting principally of citizens innocent of any crime; while the real crimes go unsolved and largely unchallenged.

    The accountable Progenitors of Crime, that is, the unseen plutocrats who ‘finance and run’ the parties; the politicians and their state bureaucrat servitors; the judiciary and lawyers who enforce and prosecute the execrable subterfuge masquerading as ‘legislation’; and the hardened dangerous real criminals, go scot free…


    The Common Law Trial by Jury was emplaced by Constitutional laws precisely for the purpose of the elimination and retribution of acts which are the product of mens rea (i.e. criminal intent; malice aforethought), such as these false War on Drugs laws made and maintained by corrupted politicians. It is now the duty of all citizens to take positive steps to bring the criminogenic illegal War on Drugs to an abrupt end; and to bring before the public (juries) those responsible for perpetrating this society-wrecking criminal subterfuge.

    The DEMOCRACY DEFINED RESTORATION Campaign and Program to counter the government crime and restore Trial by Jury are endorsed by honest citizens, eminent academics, doctors (of a variety of disciplines) and judges (U.S. & U.K.) and are central to THE REPORT. Cannabis: The Facts, Human Rights and the Law ISBN 9781902848167. See The RESTORATION Program in THE REPORT. Also see The DEMOCRACY DEFINED Campaign Philosophy webpages…

    The corruption of the modern judiciary is self-evident in judges’ upholding the criminally arbitrary authority of government, by judges actively procuring conviction of individuals for acts innocent in themselves, and the commission of which therefore indicates no criminal intent—but which are ‘forbidden’ by illegal ‘statute’.

    In flagrant breach of morality and common law, judges routinely abet persecution of innocent people by permitting and participating in prosecutions of these false ‘laws’, simply because not to do so would lose them their job. In all these cases, the citizens involved are due Amnesty and Restitution (as for other Wrongful Penalisation).

    See the Amicus Curiæ page for defendants, accessed from the bottom of the Synopsis on THE REPORT page; and the Exonerative Clinical Findings of Fact page, accessed from below the Reviews and Endorsements of THE REPORT, which are above the Synopsis.

    The power of government consists merely of the physical force which it brings to its support—of moral force, it has none. Western governments have decomposed into despotisms of the most primitive type. The proof of this derives from the fact that within the annual avalanche of legislation, there is hardly a single new law, regulation or amendment to law which would be welcomed by the whole populace and uniformly enforced by juries judging thereon.

    Control of all governments by the overriding judgments and arbitration of citizen-jurors is as much needed today as for any of the corrupt absolute dictators and monarchs of history whose inhumanity it was that produced the People’s response embodied in the very creation and installment of the Trial by Jury Justice System.

    To a degree achieved by no other system of justice, the proper Common Law Trial by Jury with full Juror’s Rights and Duty to nullify injustices and bad laws, responds to Mankind’s unceasing need: to enforce just laws; to uphold the innocent; to protect minorities; to nullify arbitrary government; and to reject injustice.

    As stated by THE REPORT, “To consent to any measure is to share responsibility for its results.” It is incumbent on all responsible citizens who deprecate crime to take appropriate and decisive actions, not allowing the money-motivated (or duped) Prohibitionists to delay or foil the utter demolition of the socially catastrophic criminogenic Prohibitions.

    Remember our duty to the hundreds of thousands, no millions, of fellow citizens and their families who have suffered, or who are now suffering under this modern tyranny; and to those innumerable others who will also suffer in future if we do not peacefully eliminate despotism and political corruption by re-establishing the Constitution’s Justice System: the Trial by Jury.

    History will recall that the Mission of THE DEMOCRACY DEFINED CAMPAIGN today is the single most important political activity in the civilized world. The well-being, prosperity, protection and happiness of all people depend upon its successful outcome.

    Join The DEMOCRACY DEFINED RESTORATION CAMPAIGN today for free… and thanks again to:

    • Trial by Jury is correctly perceived by the Owners and politicians as the only real threat to their continuing receipt of the undeserved trillions. This explains why the governments’ beholden employees, the judges, suppress the Jurors’ Nullification Duty, by misinstructing juries that they may not judge the justice, or rather the injustice, of law; and why government wherever possible denies the accused his or her right to a fair Trial by a Jury of equal fellow citizens.


      We find the quote taken from your last post intriguing.

  12. Bastiat arguments on the “Victims of Lawful Plunder” suggest that:-

    Men naturally rebel against the injustice of which they are victims. Thus, when plunder is organized by law for the profit of those who make the law, all the plundered classes try somehow to enter — by peaceful or revolutionary means — into the making of laws. According to their degree of enlightenment, these plundered classes may propose one of two entirely different purposes when they attempt to attain political power: Either they may wish to stop lawful plunder, or they may wish to share in it.

    Woe to the nation when this latter purpose prevails among the mass victims of lawful plunder when they, in turn, seize the power to make laws! Until that happens, the few practice lawful plunder upon the many, a common practice where the right to participate in the making of law is limited to a few persons. But then, participation in the making of law becomes universal. And then, men seek to balance their conflicting interests by universal plunder. Instead of rooting out the injustices found in society, they make these injustices general. As soon as the plundered classes gain political power, they establish a system of reprisals against other classes. They do not abolish legal plunder. (This objective would demand more enlightenment than they possess.) Instead, they emulate their evil predecessors by participating in this legal plunder, even though it is against their own interests.

    It is as if it were necessary, before a reign of justice appears, for everyone to suffer a cruel retribution — some for their evilness, and some for their lack of understanding.

  13. AGAIN*** Bastiat over 100 years ago perceived and cited the disastrous effects and “The Results of Legal Plunder” and we are seeing how modern-day so-called “DEMOCRATICALLY” elected governments in concert with the “MONEY_MASTERS” hope to rob us ALL* in broad daylight and the law is in place as a vanguard against possible virulent opposition…

    Bastaiat believed that:-

    It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.

    What are the consequences of such a perversion? It would require volumes to describe them all. Thus we must content ourselves with pointing out the most striking.

    In the first place, it erases from everyone’s conscience the distinction between justice and injustice.

    No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain degree. The safest way to make laws respected is to make them respectable. When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them.

    The nature of law is to maintain justice. This is so much the case that, in the minds of the people, law and justice are one and the same thing. There is in all of us a strong disposition to believe that anything lawful is also legitimate. This belief is so widespread that many persons have erroneously held that things are “just” because law makes them so.

    Thus, in order to make plunder appear just and sacred to many consciences, it is only necessary for the law to decree and sanction it.

    Slavery, restrictions, and monopoly find defenders not only among those who profit from them but also among those who suffer from them.

  14. @ DAVID

    “We find the quote taken from your last post intriguing…”

    My friend, I am posting this STUFF* (to be completely honest) for [2] reasons…

    Firstly, there’s an AGENDA* afoot in this country and coming to a town and village near you where what is written here will become a reality (if NOT* already*)…

    Right in this “glorious land” – forces are at work in this current “bloody” government and hence, the method behind my “MADNESS”…

    But moreover, in OZ – a land of illegal, convicted, criminal IMMIGRANTS* – who based on the conquest of its INDIGENOUS PEOPLES* – even more malevolent moves are being made to undermine the very tenets of so-called democracy and”THE RULE OF LAW” based on the founding principles of the “MAGNA CARTA”…

    EVIL* men are using “STEALTH” to achieve their ends but IN-THE-END, they will ultimately fail because as was agreed (MY PEOPLE PERISH FOR A LACK OF KNOWLEDGE) – but some of us are willing to run the risk of censure, castigation and possible PLUNDER* to expose the wicked shenanigans of those who wear a garb of authority and believe that a $1500 Armani suit legitimizes TYRANNY***

  15. Bastiat believed that “The Fatal Idea of Legal Plunder” has ominous connotations for us ALL*…

    If your government can rob you of a J.O.B. (just over broke); take your home; have Social Services remove your kids; tax you to the tune of about 80% (when all other stealth taxes are included) and decide through the “LAW”* how intrusive they can reach into your PERSONAL* affairs – ALL THAT’S LEFT IS FOR THEM TO TELL YOU WHICH GOD TO WORSHIP!!!

    Bastiat says it better than I ever could – after seeing the obvious moves being made, he believes that:

    On the other hand, imagine that this fatal principle has been introduced: Under the pretense of organization, regulation, protection, or encouragement, the law takes property from one person and gives it to another; the law takes the wealth of all and gives it to a few — whether farmers, manufacturers, ship owners, artists, or comedians. Under these circumstances, then certainly every class will aspire to grasp the law, and logically so.

    The excluded classes will furiously demand their right to vote — and will overthrow society rather than not to obtain it. Even beggars and vagabonds will then prove to you that they also have an incontestable title to vote. They will say to you:

    “We cannot buy wine, tobacco, or salt without paying the tax. And a part of the tax that we pay is given by law — in privileges and subsidies — to men who are richer than we are. Others use the law to raise the prices of bread, meat, iron, or cloth.

    Thus, since everyone else uses the law for his own profit, we also would like to use the law for our own profit. We demand from the law the right to relief, which is the poor man’s plunder.

    To obtain this right, we also should be voters and legislators in order that we may organize Beggary on a grand scale for our own class, as you have organized Protection on a grand scale for your class.

    Now don’t tell us beggars that you will act for us, and then toss us, as Mr. Mimerel proposes, 600,000 francs to keep us quiet, like throwing us a bone to gnaw.

    We have other claims. And anyway, we wish to bargain for ourselves as other classes have bargained for themselves!”

    And what can you say to answer that argument!

  16. The Definitive Classic Work on ANNULMENT-BY-JURY (OR ‘JURY NULLIFICATION’) by Lysander Spooner, U.S. lawyer (barrister-at-law).

    Quoting presidents, prime ministers, chief justices, judges, lawyers and learned historians in support, TRIAL BY JURY shows how Annulment-by-Jury (Jury Nullification) is the only effective (peaceful) Safeguard of Democracy. Jurors find the Not Guilty Verdict to annul prosecutions of “UNJUST LAWS” or whenever the conviction and punishment of the accused would be unfair.

    “If a juror feels that the statute involved in any criminal offence is unfair, or that it infringes upon the defendant’s natural God-given unalienable or Constitutional rights, then it is his duty to affirm that the offending statute is really no law at all and that the violation of it is no crime at all, for no one is bound to obey an unjust law.”

    “That juror must vote Not Guilty regardless of the pressures or abuses that may be heaped on him by any or all members of the jury with whom he may in good conscience disagree. He is voting on the justice of the law according to his own conscience and convictions and not someone else’s. The law itself is on trial quite as much as the case which is to be decided.” U.S. Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone, 1941-1946. (Emphases added.)

    The True European and United States Constitutional Justice System.

    The Trial by Jury Justice System derived from and was formerly adopted by all the European Nations.


    Wars, dictators, tyrannical monarchs and rulers imposing ‘codes’, constant political change; alternating adoption, modification and rejection of diverse social theories; fascism, Marxism, socialism, communism; all have wreaked upheaval and left Europe’s peoples with little or no understanding of the purpose and form of a constitutional system which precludes the unjust intrusions and outright barbarism of statism*.

    *Definition, statist: one who believes in absolute control of the People by government officials in all aspects of life, social, economic and other; as opposed to the democrat [not party-political] who believes in control of the government by the People. To achieve this end and protect the innocent from arbitrary government, the democratic person uncompromisingly insists and requires ordinary citizens as jurors in Trial by Jury to have the final say and control of every act of law enforcement.

    Within the Continent of Europe and to a great extent within modern Britain, the collective awareness that all Europeans once universally shared a constitutional ideal, has been eroded by political mis-education.

    It is a little-known fact that at one time throughout Europe, all shared, and the People rigorously defended from government interference, their unique constitutional Trial by Jury Justice System.

    The Trial by Jury was emplaced constitutionally for the purposes of:

    A.) not only ascertaining guilt or innocence of the accused and where necessary for apportioning retribution, but also…

    B.) of transcendent importance, as a barrier to protect the vast mass of innocent citizenry from the crimes of arbitrary government (i.e. unjust laws, corruption, tyranny); and from the prejudices and incompetence of fallible justices (judges).

    Trial by Jury enables the people in juries to judge authoritatively what their liberties and laws are, so that the people retain all the liberties which they wish to enjoy.

    Citizen-Juries educated and instructed to judge on the justice of law and its enforcement, can be relied upon to protect people from the state, when the state breaches correct behaviour in attempting to enforce injustices.

    It is for this reason that those who stand to gain money and/or power from tyranny by the imposition of unjust ‘laws’, regard the genuine Trial by Jury as an obstacle to be undermined and destroyed. Untrustworthy at best, of outright criminal intent at worst, are those who, instead of restoring Common Law Trial by Jury to its true form, would discard it altogether.

    This Trial by Jury Justice System is unique and inimitable: that is, it cannot be equaled by other legal arrangements. It places a curb on legislation the enforcement of which the Citizen-Juror adjudges would be unfair and tyrannical; and a Jury ensures to us—what no other court does—that first and indispensable requisite in a judicial tribunal: integrity.

    U.S. President John Adams, lawyer, pronounced about the Juror:

    “It is not only his Right but his Duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” (Yale Law Journal. See TRIAL BY JURY.)

    But nowadays, Trial by Jury is precluded by judges’ illegal intervention to forbid jurors from judging on equity issues, and on the justice of the law and its enforcement. From this vile seed despotism is extant, all-pervading and visibly growing.

    Whatever the judge’s motives, the judge is wrong not to inform jurors of their Right and Duty to do justice: e.g., State of Georgia v. Brailsford, a supreme court forfeiture trial, the facts having been ascertained, U.S. Chief Justice John Jay instructed jurors that it remained only for them to judge the law itself, saying:

    “The Jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.”

    Removal from the jurors of their judgment on justice and equity issues transforms Trial by Jury into the unlawful, one-sided, unfair mistrial-by-government-judges, the corrupt method by which tyrannies thrive. This system enables and obliges judges to enforce every persecution, stealth-tax, oppression, money-motivated subterfuge and injustice a government introduces, and which judges then lawlessly claim is “the law.”

    Legislatorial majorities enact legislation. However, in the real world (not Utopia) majority assent does not invest legislation with legitimacy or virtue, regardless of its support, e.g., Nüremberg NAZI Race Laws. If Trial by Jury had been operating in the Third Reich, the NAZI tyranny would have been truncated, the Holocaust and the Second World War averted.

    Mankind will not, and cannot, find the social environment acceptable until genuine Common Law Trial by Jury is Restored: hence The DEMOCRACY DEFINED Campaign for RESTORATION & UNIVERSAL ADOPTION.

    The profound exposé in this book explains how Justice Systems operate in fascist, communist and totalitarian tyrannies. It demonstrates that modern Western politicians have intervened to adopt the totalitarian system, denying the traditional democratic constitutional TRIAL BY JURY Justice System.

    Why would politicians and judiciary adopt such crime and tyranny ? d’Oudney’s and Spooner’s expositions comprehend the massive but concealed corrupt money-motives behind governments’ and judiciaries’ unlawful interventions.

    TRIAL BY JURY explains how degenerate politicians’ and judiciary’s judicable tampering of due process not only results in appalling consequences to Justice, Liberty and Democracy, with innumerable cases of wrongful incarceration and penalization of innocent citizens, but also is the prime mover in the engenderment of the social vortex of crime, violence, misery and strife which today pervade society.

  17. We are witnessing what Bastiat believed would happen when “Perverted Law Causes Conflict” and ultimately what ensues:

    As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose – that it may violate property instead of protecting it – then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder.

    Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious. To know this, it is hardly necessary to examine what transpires in the French and English legislatures; merely to understand the issue is to know the answer.

    Is there any need to offer proof that this odious perversion of the law is a perpetual source of hatred and discord; that it tends to destroy society itself?

    If such proof is needed, look at the United States [in 1850].

    There is no country in the world where the law is kept more within its proper domain: the protection of every person’s liberty and property. As a consequence of this, there appears to be no country in the world where the social order rests on a firmer foundation.

    But even in the United States, there are two issues – and only two – that have always endangered the public peace.

  18. Hey Terence. Good news …

    Jack Bauer escaped from the dungeon, but later he was recaptured by a secret cabal of rigged Australian jurors with the support of a rogue group of ex-CIA operatives in league with Papist lizard-people. But he escaped from them, too.

    You know, Terence, it’s always a blast to watch you cut-and-paste large blocks of mind-bendingly bad prose from wingnut websites (David Icke? Lovely fellow. He bought me a beer, once).

    In the real world of rational thought, however, people of very strong views who publish very strong assertions are usually held accountable for those assertions. They are expected to justify them, to adduce some minimal evidence for them.

    In that light, Terence, would you care to address any of the questions posed to you on this thread? Don’t worry if you can’t. Don’t worry if the questions are too hard for you. In this case, we’re sure, silence will be golden.

  19. GM:
    A double post deserves a duplicate response.

    The future may well be nuclear – but possibly thorium, not radioactive plutonium.
    Always remember that since the advent of wind generators, there have been 35 more times the deaths by wind than attributable to nuclear accidents.

    TEPCO is to nuclear generation as Halliburton, KBR and Xe is to war profiteering.
    Bogus inspections, government protection and no oversight: such is life in our corporatocracy ( the actual dictionary definition of which is – fascism ).

    Sounds alien to us in Barbados, until we recognise the similarities with our own local problem – CLICO.

    The world’s economy is so intertwined that the seemingly insignificant stress at any point can cause a major meltdown of the whole shebang.

    As it is , we have Japan one of the largest creditor nations about to withdraw billions of its global investments to fund post tsunami rebuilding.

    North African revolution and dissent spreading to the fragile oil producers of the gulf, with Iran a willing backer to the Shiite majorities in the Sunni controlled oil producing regions.

    America , crippled by QE2 with more “easing” to come (some say $170 trillion will be necessary).

    Oil set to stay above $100 per barrel for the forseeable future, and in a major crisis at least doubling in price.

    No recovery has ever, or can/will ever begin with this level of energy cost.

    But hey, lets discuss Jolly Roger, Chefette and Leroy Lynch …. put fingers in our ears and scream “La La La La La”.

    • @Straight Talk

      Do you accept people are free to discuss what they want given where we are all positioned on lifes continuum?

      You should continue to bring your perspectives to bear and let those who want to marry with your perspectives do so.

      It is hard when people remain in a place we are not but such is the nature of human beings.

Leave a comment, join the discussion.