Submitted by GoWeb Blog – Support Bajan Blogs!
I know a lady who is in a tricky situation. She has moved into a small district in a certain parish and is without telephone and electricity because there is no pole on which to run the infrastructure. The problem is that the other residents whom she found already living in the district, refuse to purchase a pole from Light and Power and expect her to do it. She has suggested that they all pool their resources and pay for a pole, but the other residents aren’t interested in such an arrangement. Apparently, if she pays for the pole, she will not own it, and will not be able to decide who can benefit from it. She obviously doesn’t find it fair for the entire district to benefit from her investment.
As I pondered the situation, it led me to question why a customer should have to pay for a pole. Isn’t it Light & Power’s job to ensure their infrastructure is in place? Also, if customers pay for their pole, shouldn’t they be able to profit from their investment too?
If there are 10 households in a district, and three of those households pay for a pole, not only do the other 7 households benefit, but Light & Power collects money from all 7 households and hence profits. They also profit by renting LIME the use of the pole, but the people who paid for the pole don’t get any profit from this rent.
Is this situation right? Should this still be happening in 2009? If I pay for a pole should I not be entitled to any profits made from that pole?






The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.