As we do with the 11-plus Examination Barbadians engage the same conversations every year come Crop Over time; too much wukkin-up, lyrics too lewd and quality of the music, and the stakeholders who stoke controversy etc. In 2009, add to the list whether the festival should proceed in light of the H1N1 virus threat and the mother of all issues the leak of the 18 semi-finals of the Pic-O-De-Crop competition.
What is evident to BU is the transition from a culture driven festival to one greatly influenced by economic considerations. Is it not obvious to the decision makers that there is a conflict of interest if the National Cultural Foundation (NCF) continues in the role of sole producer of the festival? The Crop Over Festival is the premier national event used to attract visitors to Barbados, a bonus benefit is the large number of Barbadians living overseas who see Crop Over as the ideal time to visit the land of their birth. There is no question the important economic activity which is linked to Crop Over.
In our opinion culture issues have taken a backseat in recent years at the expense of running the festival as a business. BU has no issue with the need to make money, however it is important to have the correct model to satisfy the business side as well as the need to facilitate cultural expression.
The burning question which must be given serious thought is, can the NCF adequately enable the environment to accommodate cultural expression and in the process grow the cultural industries in Barbados?
The Crop Over Festival in Barbados has become subsumed by one stakeholder, the Calypsonians. The NCF has had to allocate disproportionate resources to manage this disorganized group through the years. The perception seeded in the public domain and given root suggests a high level of distrust which exist between the NCF and the Calypsonians. Barbados has been overseeing Crop Over too long for the controversy level to be at critical year after year.
We listened very carefully to Christopher Sinckler singing the benefits of the EPA with the EU when he had responsibility for Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and International Business. One of the selling points was the economic opportunity the EPA would provide for our entertainers. He was at pains though to point out that Barbados had a lot of work to do to build structure to our entertainment industry if Barbados was to capitalize on the EPA. The EPA was signed on the 15 October 2008 and to date BU remains ignorant about any initiatives to efficiently organize the entertainment sector in Barbados. Is the NCF responsible for managing the cultural and entertainment industries in Barbados to ensure a smooth transition from an immature to competitive industry which can compete on the EU stage?
Until we have some sense about the role of the NCF in the overall strategy of managing the cultural industries cum entertainment industry in Barbados we are going no where fast.
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.