Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Looking Glass

debtAnother deficit budget is hardly surprising. Given the economic structure and reliance on fickle tourism and construction more deficit budgets will likely continue. The net effect will be to expand the gap between happiness and misery. There is a correlation between public and private debt in a population whose mental set permits lavish consumption and government unrestrained borrowing and spending, moreso when personal saving is insufficient to finance government spending. The inability of governments to generate surplus will result in more debt, drag us deeper in the red and on to perdition.

Our predicament reminds me of Marlow’s Dr. Faustus, a man of learning who, longing to possess the treasures of Nature, sells his soul to Mephistopheles (the Devil) for 24 years. In the last couple decades we sold the country for not much more than a seat at the beggar’s table and the retention of power. Today we are at the bottom of the table, mega billions in debt and the lenders/givers are taking over. Hell has no limits.

The road to perdition (deficits, debt, corruption, unprincipled regimes etc.) didn’t happen overnight. As previously stated, it is not the direct result of the current world financial crisis. Nor is it the consequence of a natural business cycle. Past regimes forewent the exacting standards of fiscal discipline. They forgot that economic prosperity depends on the productivity with which national resources are employed, and indulged in non-income generating and short term employment generation projects. In the process they failed to keep programme spending to real per capita terms, i.e. increase spending by no more than inflation. The current world crisis merely exposed our ‘limitations’ and hasten our socio-economic decline.

Both parties are guilty of, among other things, an absence of smart thinking, moreso the BLP. But it is hypocritical to blame the current administration for the current condition, even though they are guilty of, shall we say, ‘errors in judgment’ and are savvy short.

Debt increases when pre and post election promises are to be fulfilled from an empty trough. The situation was made worst when the loan promised by a sister island fell through (Why the loan didn’t materialise is another story) Had the PM apprised the people about the horrendous national debt and the cost it would have given him some breathing space and a less costly budget. Bajans would have a good reason to revise their expectations. Instead people are kept in the dark and covered with mulch like mushrooms. Why keep the debt a secret? Is it because of something to hide, protection of others or externally dictated? Failure to apprise the people set in motion a shining system of vanities and illusions as distant from the truth as Pluto.

The national debt (the sum total of “all-budget” loan guarantees and contingencies) is more than trebled that stated by the last regime, and is a lien against the people and the as yet unborn. Polished words and self-indulgent regurgitation of utterances of those thought to be significant, like dubious accounting, obscures reality and deepens the inevitable in the form of a dismal decade of distress and discontent. Maybe like Dante we need to go further into exile (perdition) to learn just how salt is the bread and how steep the stairs.

We seem to have a collective delusion, insisting that government has or should have the where-with-all to supply the ingredients for a grand, conspicuous lifestyle and prodigal extravagance to which we have a right. We believe the external world has a natural right to provide the necessary ingredients for a greedy lifestyle. The delusion is justified by blaming the external ‘environment’ for failing to accommodate us. We fail to recognise the incidence of limited resources, the limits to growth, and that growth per se does not constitute ‘well-being.’ Missing are responsibility and self subordination

Response to the recession based on unrealistic expectations borne of rational behaviour is at best a plaster that leaves the wound to fester. Rational behaviour, like economics, is a human concept not a natural law. Stimulus however implemented can’t save the day. A tight monetary policy a la Milton Freidman if it can be implemented will likely be disastrous, and a booming Real Estate economy merely underscores imminent disaster. Moreover, it is a myth to think that money and technology alone will save us.

The G20 refinanced the IMF in order to stabilize the world economy. The funds promised to the IMF will likely be invested in those European countries with one foot in the grave and those LDCs that are crucial to the G20 survival. We haven’t the track record, strong fundamentals or policies to justify inclusion in the latter category. Sure we will receive traditional aid (to reduce illness and disease etc) but not aid in the form of development financing and investment projects. What little we get will go to debt service and increase our indebtedness. Reliance on the Mother Country to bail us out each time is a pipe dream. Has anyone anywhere advised the PM accordingly, and if so did it fall on death ears? The textbook apart one wonders about the wisdom of the local confreres.

We cannot talk about the next decade without comprehending the present and understanding the past. And we are not immune or excused from world events. The recession is far from over, at least as far as labour is concerned, which is not good news for tourism. We are stuck with a growing underclass of increasingly landless unemployed and underemployed souls unable to feed themselves. With the immigration doors essentially closed the return of the ration card may not be far of. We are short on worthwhile resources, unable to generate new profitable and intangible assets, have neither dollars nor products to pay for imports and remain dependent on borrowing. We can’t swap debt for corporate equity, print money like the USA and Europe, or socialise risk and business at the expense of taxpayers. The Central Bank cannot issue enough money to keep the economy rolling without causing inflation. And financing debt from taxes has its limitations. It is a mistaken belief that low interest rates alone will facilitate business and conservation. Macro economic policies alone will not rescue the perishing.

Oil without which the world will collapse is not in unlimited supply and alternate forms of energy—bio-fuels, cold fusion etc—are many years away. Despite conventional wisdom (and regardless of the recession) declining world economic activity demand for oil will rise and so to the price, which will be reflected in almost everything we consume.

Already the international financial system is being revised. The US dollar will likely be replaced as the “unit of exchange.” Inflation will increase our debt load, import costs and compound our difficulties. China, Russian and Brazil fearing US inflation might erode their investments and exports are seeking and will have a bigger say in the IMF and the world economy. The new capitalist system will facilitate the horizontal organization of corporations (globalization). They will control trade and business, and there will be little or no room for import substitution investment.Given the above it is difficult to envision success in a country not structured for long term success. Optimism is a cloudy lens. Without Barley Loaves the next decade looks like a dismal one. Where people see no future it makes sense to live for the present. This in time will weaken the nation, undermine its culture and could invite social unrest


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. I am 100% in agreement with the author….one of Barbados’ biggest problems is the overcrowding of the political system with LAWYERS….who by practise seek out historical precedence as opposed to innovative and new ideas and DOCTORS who largely do the same in referring to known techniques. Their training teaches them to be good followers of text and tradition….funny how both of them still wear robes out of pure tradition….as opposed to creative thinkers. Imagine a country looking at first world status with ONE engineer in the political mix……We are indeed a country of paper pushing administrators, which yes UWI seems content on pushing out. Absolutely no innovative and creative thinkers…how so very sad indeed! And what is even more sad is the absence of people to solve the problem…..the local business sector can’t get beyond import, markup and sell!!!…..look at the backpage of the Sun Advocate, Local Car Industry Facing Hard Times..what Car INDUSTRY!!!…..do we make anything!!..we buy/markup and sell….….they mean buy and sell industry!!!!…..and look at our scholarship winners….more than half of them every year go and do what…..you guessed it LAW or MEDICINE..LAW does not create industries, MEDICINE creates very little……..tell me…where is this creative, innovative class that Barbados desperately needs going to come from…..ha ha….maybe Guyana!!…..that has been our REAL problem over the years….investing in paper pushing service industries…we have done a fantastic job of educating WORKERS and not entrepreneurs, and still we can’t realise that yet!!!


  2. livinginbarbados,

    Yes, this last round of this fight was brought to a swift and decisive end by by a hard blow to your head from a left hook coming straight from PDC, as you wobbled at the knees from off the ropes and as you failed to response adequately to the power punches of the PDC.

    Like Sugar Ray Leonard pummeling and beating up on Roberto Duran in the Louisiana Superdome on November 25, 1980, and how towards the end of the fight it was reported that Duran had said “no mas, no mas”, you, livinginbarbados, really should have been bawling out “no mas no mas” at the end of this “fight”.

    PS – that was really the last comment by PDC under this thread.

    PDC


  3. @LIB

    Wuhloss, PDC aint showing you no love. They accuse you of attempting to poach them away from BU and depriving us of their well thought out fiscal and taxation policy (not that your blog is not widely read) but they think that you have an ulterior motive i.e. raise the level of debate on your blog through them. They also ignored your advice to start their own blog by effectively saying “why buy a cow when milk is free”.

    As the saying goes “no good deed goes unpunished”

  4. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @Sargeant
    Although some will damn the Jamaican in me, or ridicule my English accent, I will try to keep exercising that big muscle inside my think skull. Time to pick up Sartre and try to read “Existentialism and Human Emotions”.

    For those who are not familiar with this view of the world, I will share a series of points, but it’s good to find the meanings yourself.

    1. We have no predetermined nature or essence that controls what we are, what we do, or what is valuable for us.

    2. We are radically free to act independently of determination by outside influences.

    3. We create our own human nature through these free choices.

    4. We also create our values through these choices.

    I came across this as a teenager and it’s beginning to reassert itself into my life.

    To all, I will savour the greatness of Roger Federer as existensialism in action.


  5. I prefer Serena

  6. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @Bajeabroad
    You may want to look at some of the comments made on a BU piece written by Hartley Henry several weeks ago, for the manner in which he appeared to downplay the benefits of mathematics over a good command of English.

    Keep thinking.

  7. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @PDC
    Bertrand Russell has been an important guide, so “fight” is not part of my approach. “Contest”, “contend”, etc. work better for me (stressing nonviolent opposition).

    Never let your adversary hear you say “No mas…”. Grin and bear it.

    Namaste!

  8. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @Sargeant
    “I prefer Serena”

    I prefer SERENITY.

    To everyone, this is a day for rest. I shall try to take some now.


  9. @LIB

    Here I was having fun at your expense and you go all philosophical on me.

    “Don’t sweat the small stuff”

  10. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @Sargeant
    “Here I was having fun at your expense and you go all philosophical on me”
    Sorry, my philosophy is always by me.

    I will leave you to search for “My dignity is not derived from my social standing, my achievements, my wealth, my talents, or any other way society might consider me useful. Rather, it is not derived at all; it is inherent.”

    I feel no offence given and hope to give none in return.

    “Who moved my cheese”.


  11. When the government faces deficits and borrows on the domestic market or the central bank prints money there are consequences.

    There is an idea that local debt does not matter. But this is not true. There is a limit to how much can be borrowed domestically without doing harm to the economy.

    It would be good to have a discussion on the possible negative effects of unsustainable deficits/domestic debt- Problems such as inflation, increased interest rates for both domestic as well as foreign debt, shortage of investment funds for the private sector.

  12. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @Anonymous (whichever one you are)
    You can read my comments on July 4, 2009 at 11:08 am

    It’s a matter of pick your poison, with a few caveats. If the government borrows from domestic nonbanks, then the inflation implications should be very different (less) than if they borrow from banks. If it borrows from nonbanks there may be no crowding out, depending on what the investors would have done with the funds instead of supporting the government.

    I’m not going to complicate things for Barbados by highlighting that it can BORROW DOMESTICALLY in FOREIGN CURRENCY, from banks and/or nonbanks, and that opens up another set of issues.


  13. LIB,why do you think that borrowing from the non-bank sector is less inflationary than borrowing from the banking sector?

    Where do the non-bank keep their funds?

    As a consequence of unsustainable domestic borrowing,I forgot to mention the potential problem- capital flight as investors perceive the economy to become unstable.

    What are your views?

  14. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    Anonymous // July 6, 2009 at 7:58 am {…Find a handle :-)}

    “LIB,why do you think that borrowing from the non-bank sector is less inflationary than borrowing from the banking sector?” [Economics 101: banks have the ability to create money–a liability on their balance sheet, whose counterpart assets include lending (government borrowing is bank lending in this scenario). Monetary creation is widely believed to inflationary on the supply side.

    Nonbanks do not create money. If they lend, then they will be changing their assets portfolio, eg changing bank deposits for holdings of government TBs: so their immediate spending power may fall, and that too may curb inflationary pressures from the demand side. Selling government debt to nonbanks is often a key anti-inflationary policy.]

    Capital flight is not a potential problem of much import, especially if you have capital controls that appear to work quite well. There’s a real limit to how much foreign currency cash people can accumulate and take out in suitcases. They cannot take their land and houses abroad, and they are important parts of the capital stock.

  15. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    Anonymous // July 6, 2009 at 7:58 am

    “As a consequence of unsustainable domestic borrowing…”

    Unsustainable borrowing can create very good investment conditions for lenders. Higher interest rates, etc. (meaning higher income). Having so-called unsustainable debt does not mean that a government will default, so the lenders may be happy to jack up the price of lending (interest rate) and have a reasonable assurance about capital. Look at US or Japan. Jamaica too, and it does some of the borrowing in US-denominated bonds offering better returns than in the US.

    The unsustainable debt problem can be ‘squared’ by several means (as I outlined above in other comments). Depends if the government wants to put the pain on the population. Most of Jamaica’s budget goes on debt service.

    For wider consideration. Is it the size of the debt or its (mis)use that make it unsustainable?

  16. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    Life goes in cycles, and it’s worth remembering that on the debt and the immigration issue (think back to waves of Bajans going to Guyana, over different decades, which Walter Rodney and others discussed well).

    Debt seems to hang over a country for a long time. It’s been a centuries old problem, and has pretty similar phases, though the nominal amounts and the countries affected are now much/many more.

    It’s often some unforeseen calamity that worsens the debt problem, for persons and countries.

    Remember where the Roman Empire was and look at Italy’s struggles with debt. Others to note (US/US states), Argentina, Brazil, Russia, Turkey, and on…Been in the trap for centuries.

    Remember also where Jamaica was as a developing countries at the start of the 1970s.


  17. @LIB

    Your comment above suggest you were not livinginbarbados in the early 90s.

  18. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @David
    “Your comment above suggest you were not livinginbarbados in the early 90s.” [I was not, but I did visit and had a job offer to work here in 1990, and I was covering the country/region from the UK… But get the perspective right. For Barbados, that period is the low in many living memories, but it wasn’t that bad in absolute or relative terms. Take a look at the UK (“Big England”) in the 1970s, which I did live through, fresh from university, thank you :-).]


  19. In the early 90s if we recall correctly there was high unemployment, negligible foreign reserves, flight of capital which was a symptom of a lack of confidence in government, wasn’t there a public sector 8% cut? Both political and economic indicators were pointed firmly South.

  20. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @David
    Some (not me) have said that Barbados has a low pain threshold when it comes to economic performance. If you ascribe to that notion, that will tell you something about likely outcomes in the next year or so.


  21. LIB, Thanks for your explanation.

    The high interest rates would be detrimental to investment (not financial investment). I am thinking about a change in physical capital. I am thinking it would cost more to buy equipment, put up building, etc. A reduction in this type of investment cannot be good for the economy.

  22. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @ Anonymous // July 6, 2009 at 12:33 pm
    “The high interest rates would be detrimental to investment (not financial investment).” [You always need to remember that investors are those who need money (eg, borrowers to buy physical capital) and those who have money to ‘lend’, so you have a tension. Economic policy has to try to balance conflicts such as these. Hence the concern about a large government borrowing need: it will tend to raise rates and limit funds available for other borrowers. Part of the perversity is that those who should be investing in physical capital can find themselves tempted to defer that and use spare funds they have to benefit from investing this at higher rates. You can work through that.


  23. LIB you should go back home for real and take your stupid accent from off of the radio!

    I see that David Ellis run you off the radio!

    Stupse! We dont need your advice!

    TAKE YOURSELF OUT OF THE BAJANS BUSINESS!


  24. LIB, the anonymous above does not reflect my views.

    At a time of uncertainty and declining output we should try everything to encourage investment and hopefully increase output.

    No guarantee that policies that try to restraint interest rates will lead to increase investment. We can be sure that increases in interest rates will reduce investment.

  25. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @PMAN
    “No guarantee that policies that try to restraint interest rates will lead to increase investment. We can be sure that increases in interest rates will reduce investment.” [Agreed on the first point. I don’t know where local borrowers are in terms of their being able to make desired investments at higher interest rates. In part, that reflects the fact that in a recessionary environment the pressure for rates to rise is much less, but also we may not be dealing with a substantial change, if say rates went from 6% to 7%. We need to know the expected rates of return and also what rates of return materialise. Investments here do not appear to be on hold due to cost, but more to lack of funds (see Cinnammon 88/Paradise/Fous Seasons) and or lower expected demand for the goods (hotel projects, say).

  26. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @PMAN
    CORRECTION: FOUR Seasons…


  27. I do not know what the typical rate of return is for hotel operations, but I guess based on my previous experiences in banking that it is not very high.

    When there is a shortage of funds, investors compete for those funds. This generally means higher interest rates.

    What little money is available, hotel investors in Barbados will not be able to compete for it by offering higher rates.Given the modest returns on hotel investment in Barbados the investors would have little or nothing left after paying the bankers.

  28. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @PMAN
    I think we’re agreed. Not much private investment is going on now in Barbados, and that may be because of shortage of available funding, unwillingness to pay the rates offered for funding, or both.


  29. How about uncertainty?

  30. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @David
    “How about uncertainty?” The world is full of it. Only death is certain.


  31. In the context of a recession obviously.

  32. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @David
    I understand, but with something that is all pervasive (uncertainty), what particular aspects do you want to take into account?

    Broadly speaking, that’s what you have to deal with all the time, so there is no sense in only having one plan. It’s bound to fail. You only have hope that what you expect turns out to be true.


  33. LIB,

    “Capital flight is not a potential problem of much import, especially if you have capital controls that appear to work quite well. There’s a real limit to how much foreign currency cash people can accumulate and take out in suitcases. They cannot take their land and houses abroad, and they are important parts of the capital stock.”

    Your comment above is interesting. However my recollection is that during the early 90’s there were quite large “unaccouted for”outflows and as soon as the government changed there was a reverse.

    Maybe our capital controls are better now than during the 90’s.

    You can check the Errors and Omissions of the Balance of Payments for that period. I could be wrong.I am just working on memory.

  34. livinginbarbados Avatar
    livinginbarbados

    @PMAN
    No bragging, but I did a lot of work in the 1980s to try to measure capital flight. Some fellow called Ernesto Zedillo was also one of the people I worked with, and Paul Luke. Ernesto was at Bank of Mexico at the time and went on to become president. Where did I go wrong? 🙂

    E&O is a good enough proxy in most cases, as that tends to capture the various illicit ways that people try to sneak money past the border. Remember that some legitimate capital outflows are also capital flying away.

    Got to hit the road and try to improve Bimshire’s customer service. (Email works, see my blog for address.)


  35. LIB

    Just think that if you had become President of Mexico we would have been deprived of your astute observations 


  36. Is this just a monotony of words upon words – the conspiracy theorists, the pessimists and the optimists. And Mark “Joker” Adamson of the PDC. A little learning is a very dangerous thing.


  37. @Sargeant
    Had I become president of Mexico it would have deprvied you of not much, I hope, not least because the presidency is only one term of 6 years–no re-election. Who knows, had I qualified somehow without becoming Mexican, I could have annexed the Caribbean islands or at least a few of the nicer ones. 🙂


  38. Sorry that Veritas is not happy about this discussion. This will be my last comment on this matter.

    Domestic borrowing does matter.

    We can agree that we cannot ignore domestic borrowing from the central bank(inflationary) and from the non-bank financial sector because of the possibilities of crowding out, high interest rates and capital flight.


  39. All things must pass.
    And we are still sleepwalking into the doomsday scenario outlined above.
    We need leadership, not blame sharing and prevarication.
    OK, the PM is poorly, best of luck to him for a full recovery, but hey, the country is going down the tubes, and there is no-one at the wheel.
    Every national crisis previously throws up a leader, we’re still waiting.


  40. @ ST
    The bushman tried to explain to you a while back that there is a bigger picture that needs to be seen and considered in seeking to analyze the ‘predicament’ as outlined here, that confronts us.

    Generally we humans are such, that unless faced with the most dire of circumstances, we refuse to see even the most obvious, unless it conforms to our own personal preformed mindset. This is why – as you correctly say, it takes crises to throw up leaders.

    This global spate of hopelessness and despair is really a last desperate opportunity for us to consider and see the obvious – that this world as we know it, is nothing but an illusion of reality, and a precursor of that reality – and that far from its end being an occasion for despair, it really is a new dawn of meaningful reality.

    …..i mean -seriously! … all this prosperity and ‘success’ that we seek and by which we judge our life’s success means absolutely ZILCH as individuals come to the end of said life…..as we transfer huge sums of this so-called ‘success’ to people like GP to buy us a few more months of time…

    Do you REALLY think that this is what ‘life’ is about?

    I have said it before and will likely say it again, the ONLY attribute of any value to be accumulated in this phase of existence is personal character. EVERYTHING ELSE IS INCIDENTAL.
    Character cannot be otherwise created but by experience in the crucible of earthly life, and surely we can all agree that this world of ours has been the perfect crucible for such a project.

    As this phase comes to an end, it signals the birth of a brand new, much more advanced phase of life – exactly like a baby being born into a new phase of life after the necessary 9 month in the formative womb (where its character is formed and nourished) – and after the painful and traumatic end of that phase (with birth pains, swollen feet and general physical and emotional stress on the mother and family).

    …..but what celebration when the new healthy baby arrives.

    The challenge therefore is for the baby in the womb to develop the required character during its sojourn there, to be ready for the new world environment that it will face upon birth.

    ….brings a whole new perspective to ‘success’, to wealth, and to the ‘difficulties’ that lie ahead- IMHO.


  41. BT:
    Your BBE are here on earth now, influencing every facet of human economic life.
    Their names are Soros and Rockefeller and their MME minions Geithner, Bernanke, Obama (aka, Soetoro), Emanuel, Blankfein Friedman, Cohn all these great men of character leading us down the blind alley of promised progress, to certain doom.
    I really hope your superior extra-terrestrial characters emerge and save us from these gurus before it’s too late.
    They are here now, and running the show, but where are the white hats the BBE have spawned to protect the innocent ignorants from their vile agenda?
    I’ve probably got five years in me, god willing, to carry on my straight talking, but we need a young, vibrant, fearless orator in the same vein as Kennedy, King, and O’Neil to survive the corrupt assassin’s bullets and TILII.


  42. LOL ST!!

    Their names are Soros and Rockefeller and their MME minions Geithner, Bernanke, Obama (aka, Soetoro), Emanuel, Blankfein Friedman, Cohn all these great men of character leading us down the blind alley of promised progress, to certain doom.
    *************************************************************
    I hate it when you make fun of the bush man like that ST.
    What great men what??!!
    If your hopes are pinned on such ‘great’ men as these- or even the Kennedys Kings and O’neils- to save us from our current predicament, then you must surely be a sad straight talker…..

    Trust me ST, ‘my BBE’ is on a different level altogether from anything that you (or the bushman) can even contemplate…. try to imagine one of Lowdown’s goats trying to contemplate Hoad.
    ….. LOL – even rational intelligent humans are challenged to do that….


  43. Well bring them on BT, we desperately await their longed for appearance.
    Hoadie’s goats couldn’t do worse then this current shower of incompetent “representatives”, pompasetting as the country goes through the eddoes , seemingly with their hands tied and mouths bound by dreams of personal aggrandisement.
    As you say we deserve the leaders we get, and we have very low standards.
    Ain’t anyone able to recognise that in David’s phrase we are up shit creek without a paddle and need some direction.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading