← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Adrian Loveridge - Hotel Owner
Submitted by Adrian Loveridge – Hotel Owner

Can we really learn some lessons from the events of the 22 May? We had over 40 persons to meet of three different flights that day. ZM drivers had been arranged to meet then based on scheduled and quoted arrival flight times. Close to the original arrive times it became obvious that there were going to be delays, so the sensible thing to do was to first check with the airline. One major carrier hadn’t even changed its local recorded flight arrival announcement since 9am that morning, despite the aircraft being diverted to St. Lucia and eventually landing at 4pm. On checking its website, the announcement stated that both the inbound and outbound flights were cancelled.

Another airline had not updated its recorded announcement since 11am that morning, again relating to a flight that should have landed at 9.50pm but finally arrived at nearly 2am the following morning.

Yes! We eventually extracted that it was a problem with fuel, but this should have not taken anyone here by surprise. Where does our A1 aviation fuel come from, and who had been having the problem with contaminated fuel for days?

Trinidad of course!

Also knowing the vast amounts of taxpayers monies invested in the various pipelines from Oistins and massive storage facilities at the airport, did we really not have two or three days supply of non-contaminated fuel?

I cannot understand why airlines the size and reputation of some of the carriers that service Barbados, seemingly do not relate that it may be one of their relatives, an ageing grandmother, wife, child or distance friend that could be on that flight.

Just for a moment, try and imagine the worry and concern of friends and relatives meeting those flights, let alone the huge loss in productivity and expenses related to the delays. For the sake of a Manager taking the responsible of ensuring simply basic communications to the people that actually pay your salary, it reminds us that we are still a long way from making ‘tourism our business’.

Grantley Adams International is now one, if not the most expensive airport to use throughout the Caribbean, extracting over $90 million in departure taxes each year alone.

If the individual airlines are unwilling to play their part in ensuring their customers are kept informed on a timely basis, then perhaps GAIC should step up to the plate.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. Let’s hear what the Minister of Tourism has to say on this one,similarly the Minister of International Transport and any other connected ministry or board. They are on top of things.

  2. Wright B.Astard Avatar
    Wright B.Astard

    I would have thought that part of the mandate of the BNOC was to have the necessary equipment to test a sample of every batch of fuel delivered from Trinidad. Fer Gads sake, back in the 50’s /60 the sugar bonds in Bridgetown used to check every truck load of sugar delivered,and technology has advanced by leaps and bounds since then.


  3. @Wright B.Astard

    As Adrian L alluded in his submission this is not about technology but lose management systems at work.


  4. Poor Adrian i really feel sorry for him , i would hate to be so stupid .


  5. Poor “Only me”, I really feel sorry for you, it must be a burden for YOU to be so stupid.


  6. On a point of privilege 🙂

    Has Barbados recovered the money spent to charter a plane to return the Ghanaians which were let lose in Barbados in 2007?

    Have the temporary airport runway lights been returned to Barbados?


  7. Good point David , we need some answers there


  8. As I understand it, not only the fuel companies, but the airline engineers themselves are supposed to check the fuel for contamination. In reply to Adrian’s point about there being sufficient uncontaminated fuel, I believe that airlines were playing it safe and not taking any chances at all once contamination was discovered. The communications aspect, however, is unforgivable under the circumstances.


  9. Back to the point at hand…

    The heck with harassing LIAT pilots and questioning their salaries – what about continuing bad management? How can ANY manager justify allowing ANY contract negotiations with ANY employee group to continue for 12 years?

    Thousands of PAID man-hours – on both sides – wasted in pursuit of “teaching the employee who is in charge”. For representation purposes it is reasonable for LIAT to pay managers and employees to be at a negotiating table… but NOT for 12 years!!!!

    I ask – and we should all ask – that the Board send in an independent auditor to assess what this major decade-long exercise in time-wasting has cost the airline, who ordered the on-going procrastination, terminate those in management who were responsible, and ensure that it does not happen again. We have lost the MINIMUM of the equivalent of the salaries of TWO pilots and TWO LIAT managers for this ridiculous inconvenience.

    The pilots went on a sick out, not because of salary, but because of being finally out of a contract after 12 years of negotiation.

    10 years would have been unreasonable… 5 years would have been unreasonable… heck, 2 years would have been unreasonable. What was LIAT management thinking?

    THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THIS HAS HAPPENED!!! _Why_ is Mr. Brown “surprised”??

    Caribbean management as a whole encourage waste because they think they have to prove they have the upper hand in order to get savings. But in fact when industrial action becomes a reality because workers become fed up they do exactly the opposite.

    When you harass the pilots you are harassing the wrong group, people… see your MP or Prime Minister and DEMAND that LIAT management change their approach to industrial relations.

    That’s where the problem lies – remember, LIAT pilots patiently had restraint for the last 12 years to avoid this – and now you want to beat them up for having decided enough was enough?

    Not fair. And that’s not competent management by the Board or the top and middle management which has been running the company for the last 25 years!!!

    Time for a change in Board and management, maybe??


  10. Thanks for your side of the LIAT saga bimjim. We have always subscribe to the view that many of the problems originate with old thinking at the shareholder and Board level. If Barbados wants to protect its investment it needs to get more serious about this LIAT story. In many ways it is analogous to the WIBC.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading