← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Hallam Hope – Consumer Advocate and Managing Director Caritel

Hallam Hope
Hallam Hope

An application for increased electricity rates has been made to the Fair Trading Commission which proposes the highest increase for domestic consumers.

It is proposed that consumers using 50 kilowatts monthly (at the bottom of the scale) would pay an increase of $3.47 and those at the top using 500 kWh would pay an additional $11.04. In between there are proposed rates for citizens using 100 kWh ($3.50), 150 kWh ($8.46), 200 kWh ($8.83), 300 kWh ($9.57) and 400 kWh ($10.30).

The company has contended that businesses have been paying a greater share of the cost of providing electricity and is seeking to adjust this so domestic consumers pay a larger share than they have in the past.

As a result the power company is proposing to increase the Rate of Return it makes from the Domestic side of the market from the current 2.58 per cent to 7.82 per cent, which is the single largest increase of the five categories.

So rather than the current return of 4.1 million dollars it is seeking to earn 12.6 million dollars from its application. The likelihood of an electricity rate increase by October coincides with pending higher telephone rates of four per cent.

Armed with the above information and our electricity bills it is possible to calculate what our new monthly bills would be if the application was accepted without change. This is particularly useful for persons at the bottom of the income ladder such as pensioners.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. @Hallam Hope

    we don’t bite. It’s your submission and if you objected you could have sent us an email suggesting objection to the title. We don’t bite.


  2. Move to NATIONALISE the Barbados Light and Power and done dis shite…!


  3. How about smart meters for a start– then at least the people will know where their $$ is going. Then invest in some lanterns and go utility free 2 nights a week…


  4. @BAFBFP: “Move to NATIONALISE the Barbados Light and Power and done dis shite…!

    So you, and the Consumers of Barbados, would be happy with the same level of service from their Electrical Power Provider as they currently receive from their Water Provider?

    Or, to put it another way… (And on the table…) Are you actually arguing that you and the Consumers of Barbados would be happy receiving the same level of service (and accountability) as currently provided by our Government and their agencies for your electricity?

    Hope you have lots of candles on hand….


  5. Yes Christopher, YES! In any event candles are cheap cheap cheap…!

    If the Gov’ment takes over the power company the only people that would get replace are the CEO, the COO and the FC. Everyone else (including Mark) would remain untouched. Hah…tek dah!


  6. @BAFBFP… Kind sir…

    Nope, sorry sir. I don’t buy it. (Joke intended…)

    Please give me a single example of any nationalized service here in Barbados which has had that status for five (5) years or more that you’d bet your life (or your business) on running reliably.

    A few examples I’ll bring forward where you likely wouldn’t make that bet:

    1. The QEH.
    2. The Airport.
    3. The Water Authority.
    4. The Transport Authority.
    5. Highways (read: Town and Country Planning).
    6. The FTC.
    7. The list goes on and on…

    At the end of the day, everyone is getting all upset about BL&P’s application (because there are lots of zeros).

    But the actual financial impact per consumer is minor compared to everything else we face here.

    (IMHO…)


  7. Electricity is as important to our well being as the Police service. Would you like to see the Police and the Sanitation authority (2 pick ups a week, just give them $50 at Xmas each year) placed in private hands with overseas share holders and ROI to account to/for?

    Please Chris do not try these stale arguments. Governments fuck up all the time, but we are comfortable with them running Barbados Inc. for five years at a time. They can be changed and improved and they are very visible people, unlike those from Leucadia National Corporation.

    I SAY NATIONALISE!!!


  8. CH:

    In this time of transition from cheap energy, do you think this application to the FTC gives Barbados a chance to completely change our energy cost perspective.

    Insist on a bargain which puts net metering at parity for input and output.

    Why not?

    BL&P have the benefit of large scale production , along with the safety net of the Fuel Adjustment Clause.

    Individual consumers must be incentivised to make the initial investment into RE.

    Half cock, as is the existing arrangement, will not jump start the transition necessary to address the coming energy squeeze.

    We may, as a small island state, already be behind the curve, but whilst we still have still some influence over our energy providers we must make it count.

    We are blessed by an abundance of RE opportunities which we ignore and denigrate at our ultimate peril.


  9. @BAFBFP…

    Thank you for your immediately above.

    You have explained your position completely.


  10. @Straight Talk: “Insist on a bargain which puts net metering at parity for input and output.

    Sigh…

    Just in case none of you have actually *read* the application (or, gods forbid, actually understood it)…

    BL&P is offering to pay Renewable Energy providers feeding back into the grid almost twice the cost of the fuel surcharge to do so…


  11. Double sigh Chris:

    We are not talking fuel input, RE is free, Diesel is foreign exchange.
    We are talking cost parity.
    KwH in=KwH out.


  12. To Straight talk… Triple sigh…

    There is no such thing as free…

    I’m sorry to burst your confused bubble, but Renewable Energy is not “Free”.

    (Perhaps others can explain this truth to you more clearly…)

    If you don’t believe this, then…

    Please…

    Could you please tell us all how you, and we, can feed back into the Grid because of the “free solar energy” available to us all here in Barbados without expending money for the equipment required to collect it?

    *PLEASE DO TELL US ALL HOW TO DO THIS*.

    We’ll all be rich!

    (@All… I apologise for my above. There is no such thing as free energy…)


  13. Quadruple sigh:

    It is you who discounted the catalyst between the the sun and the socket in your first response.

    What I am suggesting is that, wherever the generation, the energy is of equal value.

    And it will become increasingly valuable.

    You are the one who equated Fuel Adjustment Clause to price.

    I am saying that, because of an individual’s decision to become an independent generator of energy he should be encouraged by being able to sell his energy at the same rate as the monopoly supplier.

    Or is it that you feel that the monopoly has a right to put their profit above the country’s economic wellbeing.


  14. But you know Chris I am looking for support particularly from established objectors like yourself. You have a good platform to start this thing going. You don’t make much from these rate hearings so you have little to lose. Forget the hearing and introduce the public to the option of the company selling new stock to the government and save all the Halsal.


  15. @BU Family… ROTFL…

    So now we know (or, at least, can reasonably conclude…).

    BAFBFP and Straight talk are the same.

    Who else, other than myself, would be so sad and as pathetic as to Blog on a Sunday night….


  16. Some conclusion.

    If this is another of your misconstrued Ideas4Lease. I for one am not renting.


  17. @Straight Talk

    I think you have missed one fundamental market driver in terms of the economics of RE.

    “What I am suggesting is that, wherever the generation, the energy is of equal value.”

    Error!

    Renewable energy generation is not and is a some distance away from being on par with the generation from fossil fuels. This is caused by load/demand following issues. Without storage RE is not dependable, at night when you may need solar radiation it isn’t there. The wind does not blow always and we know the issues when it comes to the cost and maintenance of batteries. BL&P needs to supply you with electricity if your little RE is in production or not and having this ‘back up’ capacity cost money to operate and maintain. Unless you plan on going full solo and take down the electric cables to your house, BL&P has to pay not only for fuel but also all the costs associated with generation and distribution. However the energy you ‘shoot’ into the grid from your panels or turbine only saves them in fuel but not in operations and maintenance costs. So your electricity is not of the same value!

    All successful, feed-in tariff situations across the world have been driven by heavy gov’t subsidies and strict environmental policies, not the laws of (short-term) economics. I believe BL&P have been more than generous with the 1.8 x Fuel Adjustment Clause feed-in tariff. Especially for something that is not seemingly government subsidised or driven.


  18. RE Engineer:

    I accept all of your transmission costs need to be factored into the equation, but as a nation we have to move away from fossil fuel dependency.

    The right balance to be struck has to encourage the individual to begin to aim for energy independence.

    I realise this is impractical right now, but a start has to be made, otherwise we will be forever tied to the ever increasing cost of fossil fuel generation.

    I read that BL&P Holdings net is holding steady around $800,000,000.
    and the share price is steady, even the rights issue is over-subscribed.

    No problems then on the bottom line.

    Their regularity in appealing to the FTC is normal for a contentious commodity provider.

    All I am asking for is the same level playing field you are granting the monopoly.

    We all know that there will only be a certain amount of consumers willing to invest in the equipment necessary to provide the same energy as BL&P were granted on their inception.

    Maintenance of domestic generating capacity will fall upon the consumer,exactly as it does upon the monopoly supplier when they were granted the grid.

    Let’s stop talking about RE and do it, and to do it needs government and individual will.

    It needs it NOW.

    No flannel, inquiries, commissions, task forces, consultants……action now.


  19. @ST

    “Let’s stop talking about RE and do it, and to do it needs government and individual will.”

    I agree with you 150%. But government needs to play a significant role in this development and not the general backseat role, and in many cases a prohibitive role. The technology is there and the knowledge is there, the will is what is lacking. I do not believe that making BL&P a public entity will enhance this at all. We need an increase in incentives and better information channels for the currently available incentives. Solar energy systems are modular, so if you have $1000 or $40,000 to spend on one you can start to generate some of your power however negligible it may be and that would be a start. All we need is a proper start. But government has a big role to play in this. BL&P is clearly trying to do its part despite the economic battle.


  20. Will someone say something about Leucadia National Corporation…?


  21. BAFBFP
    what happen to the development of the old eye hospital site which was to be done by Leucadia?


  22. THis is all that I could find:-

    http://www.blpc.com.bb/FinReport/REPORT07-ShareLetter.pdf

    Almroth Williams…? My God!


  23. How does TeleBarbados fit into the BL&P financial structure?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading