← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Looking Glass

Stimulus Package Locally made soft beverages (sweet-drinks) are no more. Today almost all soft drinks and concentrates like mauby and ginger beer come from abroad. Is it that small domestic industry is beyond the ability or inclination of the Bajan? Imagine Canadian brand bottled water on our supermarket shelves. We have some of the softest, purest, natural water any where on planet earth, much of which goes to watering golf courses. An 18 hole golf course requires about 3000 gallons of water a day. This helps to lower the water table and increase the cost to the people. Wouldn’t it be better to bottle and sell our own water? At least it would generate some jobs and revenue.

Then there is JU-See, one of the best soft drinks around. The company was uniquely positioned to more or less monopolize the market. Production cost notwithstanding, the loss of market share and declining profit margins was more or less inevitable. In an age of flavourings, essences—from strawberries and grapes to pineapple and guava— and packaging, little was done to diversify and bring new products to the market. One is hard-pressed to find a country where soft drinks and water-based tropical fruit drinks are not profitable. It seems that foreign control is needed to render our business profitable.

Flying fish has long been a staple. There is a mob-o’-ton of fish of all sorts, especially off the East and South coasts. Shortly after SHRIMP was discovered at our doorstep, Dipper brought in a small fishing fleet capable of fishing where our little fishing boats couldn’t go. Before long the ships ended up tied to the wharf. Why need not detain us here, but it wasn’t due to the lack of fish. One person got one of the ships met the Japanese trawlers, took what they didn’t want and made a tidy living. Nothing wrong with that. The four vessels the Canadians gave us for inter-regional transport also had a very short life.

Has it occurred to those past and present with, among other things, self-possessed vision, to set up a little fishing industry to service the island and export It makes more sense to invest the $40m set aside for decorating Sandy’s House on three on four small fishing boats, processing equipment and enhancing storage facilities. External agencies will help. There is a market for fish and unique flying fish and by-products at home and abroad. When we can’t get flying fish or the price is too high, a flying fish lunch can be had at a certain New York hotel for about a modest $160.00.

In certain countries the water is so polluted the fish is left alone or eaten at your peril Fish has to be imported The fact that they could come from far away to fish in our waters as has been and is the case right now underscores market existence. Flying fish can be gutted and packaged whole them, or down the centre into two steaks and sold in packets of four or six steaks. The melts (and rows) can be made into a gourmet condiment specialty fit for the royal table. Heads and bones can be made into broth and soup. Add bits of root crops, or vegetables and different assortments of spices and you end with product differentiation. The same can be done with other kinds of fish.

Consider small industries to make sweet potato, yam, plantain and breadfruit chips, cassava flour and by products like jams, jellies etc, from citrus products. The price of wheat flour was so high in Nigeria the people started mixing it with home made cassava flour. Today cassava flour is a flourishing industry in its own right. Land devoted to growing these and other food items will feed the people, be far more productive, and generate much more long term revenue and employment than golf courses, hotels— we continue to have excess ‘hotel’ capacity— and homes for rich expatriates. Has anyone stopped to ponder the socio- economic and psychological impact of the latter?

By the way I believe there is a law on the books restricting the height of buildings, also one restricting the use of agricultural land to agriculture production only. Have these laws been amended in any way? Or are foreigners exempt? Perhaps it is time we stop the remaining agricultural lands—like Todds— being given over to building projects and golf courses. Given the rising cost of imported food we might to return to bush tea for sustenance

The notion that agricultural land, especially sugarcane land is non-productive is patently false. Sugar on its own was never really competitive. Sugar lost its competitive advantage when the preferential status it enjoyed in the mother country ended and other substitute sweeteners came on stream. Lower export prices rather than more expensive sugarcane or declining yields per acre resulted in declining profit. Except for rum, molasses and falernum, we failed to generate sugar-byproducts.

Falernum is apparently a rare and unique product that is unique to Barbados. Mixed with soda or coconut water it makes a splendid non-alcoholic beverage. Among other things it can be used in desserts, light pastry, sweet salads, appetizers and other concoctions. We are still to exploit the potential of this unusual product. Then too there is the good old Swank—syrup and lime etc, waiting to be rediscovered.

Coconut water is naturally isotomic with the same level of electrolyte balance as found in our blood. It contains lauric acid found in mother’s milk, more potassium than most soft drinks, has less fat, no cholesterol, is high in chloride and is naturally sterile. These products are more healthy for the body than the most popular soft drinks on the market.

To start we would have to import citrus from the islands while growing the products we need, which is not a bad thing. It would generate revenue and employment, lower consumer prices and facilitate trade all around. As an added bonus the islands could end up buying more from us which would enhance our export earnings and reduce imports.

Will any of these projects come on stream? Don’t hold your breath. Some years ago Professor Francis noting the importance and value of agriculture beckoned Bajans to return to the land. The response was revealing: “…you expect our children with five or more ‘O Levels’ to work the land… you must be joking… We got people here to do that.” Not much has changed. We were born to wear collar and tie. Working the soil is a deadly sin.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. Dark Knight, my apologies for touching a raw nerve and having the audacity to ask whether there had been a public request for proposals and or tender.

    “recommendation of the Evaluation Committee that negotiations should be entered into with the first ranked firm, 3S Structural Steel Solutions LLC”

    How did 3S become the first ranked firm? How could they become first ranked when there was no publicly advertised RFP or tender for a multimillion dollar project? Is that what you refer to being transparent? What has a BOLT got to do with there not being a RFP/tender?

    You and ru4real keep introducing the red herrings of an MOU, Contract and BOLT but I am interested in you telling us what process was used to select 3S as the first ranked firm.


  2. The previous administration asked for solutions to the traffic problem the EXACT SAME as John Boyce is asking NOW.

    They were the company that offered the best most innotive solution on the best terms.

    Now you haven’t got them and you have a mess. And you STILL have a traffic problem .


  3. Because they offered the best most innovative solution to the traffic problem on the best terms.

    Now you dont have them and you have a mess and you STILL have a traffic problem.

    And thanks to the sabotaging techniques of the MPT Barbados is 128 million to the bad.


  4. Nostra its pretty obvious that you are a member of the illustrious BAPE that nit picking bunch of foolish virgins that offer NO SOLUTION to ANYTHING.
    But can only harp on and on about transparency and them are eaten up with envy when someone provided the SOLUTION and actually gets on and does it!
    Same as the DLP
    You lot won the election now stop whinging on how bad the last administration were and get on and govern the damn country.

    ACTION speaks louder that words
    And the botch up on the highway says it all.

  5. Wishing In Vain Avatar

    While you are at it and you seem to know the inner workings of thedismissed BLP clan of crooks what can you tell the public about the fraud Kerrie Symmonds committed against Mr Boolani taking money from him to get his son Barbadian status?

    The Higway we all know that between Rayside and COW Construction they accounted for 98 % of the work and their pay cheques amounted to $ 60 Million but what happened to the remaining $ 58 million the remainder of which was paid to a fraud in J Danos of 3 S construction fame, a man that is before the courts in EVERY COUNTRY THAT HE HAS WORKED IN!!!

    Maybe rather than all you utter rubbish you ought to really address where the $ 58 million in taxpayers monies has gone??

    Who’s pocket has the $ 58 Million fallen into???

    Clarke said that he never had a word of input, that it was Mottley, Nicholls, Bannister, Owing, Danos, Hobson and Bizzy that did all the talking and decided how it would happen.

    Then again it was the BLP doing their deal so no one would know who to trust my best bet would not to trust from The Parro In A Suit Greenidge all the way up to their leader Owing.


  6. ru4real ,” the previous administration asked for solutions to the traffic problem”

    How did the previous administration ask? By telepathy? Smoke signals? Bongo drums? Prayer?

    Dark Knight says 3S was the “first ranked firm”. However he won’t tell us the process that they went through to reach that ranking.

    I am not an Engineer and hence not a member of BAPE. I am not a BLP or DLP supporter. I am just a citizen sick of DLP, BLP, and the partisan likes of ru4real, Dark Knight and Wishing in Vain. Sick of seeing taxpayers money wasted.

    How could a multimillion dollar project like the ABC flyover/ road widening be awarded to a company without a publicly advertised RFP/Tender process? The way it should work is that there is a publicly advertised pre-qualification selection process. From those that pre-qualify you ask for proposals based on criteria set out in the RFP document. Then an evaluation is made and the top ranked applicant selected and negotiations entered into with them. If those negotiations are favourable you sign an MOU that sets out the responsibilities of the parties. Then a detailed contract is signed of which the MOU is an integral part.

    If 3S was able to prequalify and had been selected from a process like this, rather than in some backroom, we would not have had this sorry mess that has cost the taxpayers dearly.

    The question to you and Dark Knight is why was there no RFP/Tender process for this multimillion dollar project? That’s the multimillion dollar question that you, BLP, Dark Knight and all the 3S ABC flyover/widening acolytes have been unwilling to answer.

    As a result the public have drawn their own conclusion.

  7. Wishing In Vain Avatar

    Nostradamus,
    Think on this, you know that they had to have a scam in place when the Minister in charge was never allowed in on their meetings nor was he ever asked to offer a suggestion or comment, ask Glyne Clarke he will tell you the whole truth AS HE GLYNE CLARKE KNOWS THE TRUTH.

  8. Wishing In Vain Avatar

    Nostradamus,
    Think on this, you know that they had to have a scam in place when the Minister in charge was never allowed in on their meetings nor was he ever asked to offer a suggestion or comment, ask Glyne Clarke he will tell you the whole truth AS HE GLYNE CLARKE KNOWS THE TRUTH.


  9. Estwick spoke on stimulus house building program. He said refurbishing Lodge and Harrison College part of stimulus. Thompson mentioned before two ten storey office blocks in Warrens. Are office blocks in stimulus package Wating In Vain? When construction starting?


  10. Reports we have indicate that the prelim work required for construction to begin building is in motion i.e. surveying and architectural .
    To use Dr. Robinson’s term, Barbados has no shovel ready projects to compare to the USA and other developed countries.
    It is the big difference between developed and developing countries.
    In seems this is where Dr. Robinson and Dr. Persaud differ on the issue.


  11. Both the DLP and BLP must be sent packing from the parliament of this country. And the quicker they are rid of from the political landscape of this country, the better for the country and the broad masses and middle classes of people living in it, socially, politically and otherwise.

    For, the leaderships of these two joke parties and their main corporate associates wickedly continue to help make life a living hell for thousands upon thousands of people in Barbados, whilst believing that they themselves must live in relative luxury, fatten their own pockets, and look after their own personal, corporate interests and familial interests, primarily. Surely, this ungodly bunch – from that gross inept David Thompson, to that foolish drool Kenny Best – the worst speaking parliamentarian in recent memory, and from the most ineffective and inadequate BLP opposition leader to date, to that political donkey from St. Peter, must be got the rid off at ALL costs, politically!!

    Make no doubt about it, too, across the many social categories in Barbados the leaderships of these DLP and the BLP are together wickedly playing mind games with the broad masses and middle classes of people of this country. This behavior has become so sickening and depraved that many many country men and women who did vote in the last election have seen through the nasty stinking collusion and duplicity of the DLP and BLP. Take, for instance, the Hardwood Housing Scandal. During the run up to the last election the leadership of the DLP had castigated the leadership of the BLP/BLP for the infelicities surrounding the Hardwood Housing Factory, and had promised to the electorate that if they were elected they would deal properly with any one that was found to have done anything wrong, esp criminally wrong, involving this said scandal which saw millions being misspent.

    Now, now, 15 months since the election of the DLP to governmental office NO one, NOT one soul has been called to account or made to account for the gross misdeeds of this company. Wow, what a scandal in itself – this DLP lack of accountability!!

    Well, if the DLP and BLP so foolishly believe that they can continue to get millions of dollars from some of their corporate associates, and hand out many of these dollars to certain voters at election time, and thus in that way helping to get those said voters to turn their attention away from the madness and foolishness that these stupid old factions would have been committing between elections – whether in or out of government, and which too at the same time would be meaning that they ( the DLP and BLP ) would be really getting these voters to throw away their votes ( simply voting for them and their candidates), rather than voting for what is right and good in their interests, we in PDC must let them know in no uncertain terms that they are really going to be fooling themselves if they think that because such supposed money solutions and voter indifference worked in the past that such will continue to work in the foreseeable future.

    What madness indeed!! Down with the damn DLP and BLP do!!

    PDC


  12. Has anyone (i.e. Nostradamus, Dark Knight, ru4real, WIV) noticed according to minister Estwick, two 10 story office blocks are to be constructed at Warrens? A request for tenders may or may not be issued. However, Rotherly Construction and Jada have already been promised the work (so much for Black economic empowerment). Please note that these buildings are to cost $400 million according to Estwick !!!!! What happen to the hospital?


  13. Wind Bag in Pain

    You are a LIAR and no doubt paid by the DLP and this site that is so PRO DLP and so full of LIES.
    To say that the Minister was not in meetings is a lie .
    How do you know?
    What are you the cleaning lady?
    To say that Mr Danos is before the courts is a wicked unfounded untruth that has been fabricated especially for Barbados.
    On the contrary Mr Danos is a man whose work has been honoured by his country by being awarded the MBE.
    Everything that comes out of your mouth is a LIE .
    By your own word you are NOT an engineer so what do you KNOW about anything?
    Yours is the job to BAD MOUTH honest companies and people and help Justify the sabotage of a flagship project that would have made Barbados the envy of the Caribbean.

    Your DLP won the election MUCH GOOD it has done them.However instead of governing the country your lot just spiel out the same old lies.

    3S was ILLEGALLY dismissed in order to give the project to CLICO Rayside and Abdul Pandor.

    For NO OTHER reason.

    There isnt a engineer on the island that are capable of building such a project much less the incompetent CLOWNS at MPT .

    Your vitriolic posts only seek to distract.
    So why did NASH LOVELL and WINSTON COPPIN sign the MOU.
    and then do all they can with lies and nefarious practices to destroy a government project.

    They should both be sacked all they have done is cause Barbados to spend millions of dollars to no avail.

    Windbag in Pain all your do is to try and shift the blame for the almighty botch up of the road project.

    All of Barbados KNOWS that a COLOSSAL MISTAKE has been made.

    Every last man woman and child knows that the patched up highway was a Boob boob BIG TIME.

    So keep spinning out the LIES they cant convince a 3 year old.


  14. Nostra

    The public couldnt give a monkeys about pre this and that.

    They see the INCOMPETENCE and the BOTCH up of the ROAD and come to their own conclusions.

    They ask why did the MPT oppose and undermine the ABC project.

    They SEE with their own eyes that which international traffic experts and engineers have being saying all along.

    Widening the road DONT work.

    The only decent bit of highway is the bit built under the expert supervision of 3S.

    The rest is all an expensive botch up.


  15. Back to Basics RU4Real.

    3S was never a trade recognised construction company.

    Indeed it was formed about the same time of your much touted MOU.

    You cannot provide one contract that 3S completed successfully.

    Their whole operation was run from a serviced rent-a-desk operation in the USA.

    They never successfully completed a single job in the USA although The Nation naively promoted their first world credentials.

    Danos was a Sales Manager, not an engineer.

    Your attempts to promote this outfit of chancers to an internationally recognised legitimate engineering firm are laughable to be kind, but pathetic if I was truthfully honest to your desperate clinging on to the promised big pay-off.

  16. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    Passin Thru,

    Sadly you need to have a look around and you will see much to your regret that work has started at Warrens and to the best of my knowledge this work will cost around $ 100 million and not the figure that is seen on this site, as for who has received the work it think the gov’t should be complimented on its judgement to award these contracts to two companies who combined employ more construction workers than all of the rest and with a slow down expected the good judgement displayed by the Prime Minister, Minister Estwick and Minister Boyce and the rest of the Cabinet was to make sure these companies kept their workers working and they have managed to have done so in record time and neither one of these two construction companies seem prepared to send home any of their workers.

    I would say to you that if you still find it possible to argue and complain about progressive serious action being taken to assist our people then you are in a very bad way, and do not want our people to be assisted thru these difficult times.


  17. WTF is that ramble all about WIV.
    Got a hangover?

    I used to respect your stiletto like attacks at the rotten substance but you have lately assumed the corrupt persona of your arch villain RR.

    We’re just over one year in and your apologetic posts are already tiresome.

    Shape up or ship out,

  18. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    Court battle over secret export commissions claims· Company accused of circumventing bribery law Ex-manager denies kickbacks and fraud

    David Leigh and Rob Evans The Guardian, Wednesday 2 January 2008 Article historyOne of the richest families in Britain is being accused in a courtroom battle of circumventing anti-bribery laws.
    The Mabey family firm, whose worldwide empire is based on exports of steel bridges, is accused by its former sales manager of misconduct in sales to Jamaica, the Dominican Republic and Panama.

    The former manager, Jonathan Danos, says that large secret payments of “commissions” to middlemen were artificially split to make them look smaller, and thus avoid official scrutiny.

    In all three countries, there was no competitive bidding for contracts, profits were alleged by him to be exceptionally high, and the money had to be borrowed from commercial banks, adding to the heavy debts of poor countries.

    Many of Mabey’s sales are backed by the British taxpayer. The loans were guaranteed by the Export Credits Guarantee Department (ECGD), which is part of the Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.

    While Danos is making accusations against the company, he himself is being sued by the firm for allegedly pocketing hundreds of thousands of pounds for himself in corrupt kickbacks on the deals.

    Mabey got a freezing order preventing the sale of Danos’s luxury home in Notting Hill, west London, last year and went to court. The high court said in a preliminary hearing there was “strong prima facie evidence” of fraud by him.

    But Danos, who was awarded the MBE in 2000 for services to British exports, has denied all the claims, and retaliated by filing a detailed account of the devices he alleges were used by the firm to get around anti-bribery laws passed by the British government.

    Excessive commissions are a common means of passing on bribes. As a result, British and US authorities generally frown on payments above 5%.

    Danos claims that he was ordered to divide an 8.5% commission to be passed to a Jamaican businessman, Deryk Gibson, into two parts – a commission of 5%, and another 3.5% for non-existent “local services”. He was also ordered, he alleged, to similarly split a 17% commission for a deal in the Dominican Republic, where the agent is named as a local businessman, Gilberto Pagan. In a third set of deals, in Panama, commissions were paid at 15%, he alleged, to a bank account in the Bahamas allegedly controlled by another agent, Rogelio Dumanoir.

    The Jamaica allegations will be particularly dismaying for the ECGD. Its advisory council conducted a special review of the £17m Jamaica guarantee in 2003, under pressure from anti-corruption campaigners, and concluded: “There is no great cause for concern.”

    The then trade minister, Richard Caborn, said at the time: “I am pleased … This work will benefit the people of Kingston and rural areas”.

    A Mabey director, Richard Glover, later unsuccessfully tried to persuade the ECGD that the firm should be allowed to keep its agents’ identities secret.

    He wrote in 2005: “Exporters should be free to pay legitimate commissions to their agents without the burden of the obligation to provide ECGD with details that are often confidential and commercially sensitive.”

    In his court filings, Danos paints in rarely seen detail a picture of a company that regularly paid huge sums to confidential agents to make sales around the world, although he does not directly accuse them of bribery. He says the firm’s founder, Bevil Mabey, who is 90, “established close relationships with high-level officials … and even in some cases vice-presidents and presidents”.

    But when Britain passed an anti-bribery law in 2001, the founder’s son, David Mabey, changed the company’s procedures. Danos says he was told the “artificial split” in commission was “as a result of a need to comply with” the law, the Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001. US lawyers gave advice, Danos claimed, that commissions above 5% would also lead to suspicions by the US authorities of “bribery or inducements”.

    The Mabey companies have previously been accused by anti-corruption campaigners of overcharging for sales of bridges and flyovers in the Philippines and Papua New Guinea.

    They are still also under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office over allegations of kickbacks paid to the Saddam regime in the oil-for-food scandal. The UN Volcker report alleged that Mabey paid $202,000 (about £102,000) in return for a $3.6m Iraqi contract. The company says there is no truth in the allegations.

    The Mabey family is estimated to be worth £310m. The most recent accounts show family members drew out £7m in personal dividends in the last year. The company regularly donates to the Conservative party.

    A spokesman for Mabey said: “This case is about an alleged fraud on the company. We take the strongest possible action against employees and former employees who breach our policy or the law.

    “This case is not about allegations of bribery and corruption. However, we have not, do not and will not pay or authorise the payment of bribes or any other form of unlawful inducement. We have a comprehensive anti-corruption policy with procedures which are vigorously enforced.”

    Mabey is negotiating with Danos in private to try to settle the case before it comes to court.

    Anti-corruption campaigner Sue Hawley, of the Corner House group, said last night: “Mabey has consistently been accused of sharp practices, and untransparent contract procedures.

    “If companies can evade scrutiny of their commission payments by hiding them away as ‘local services’, this would blow a very large hole in the ECGD’s anti-corruption processes.”


  19. On tonight’s CBC news Minister Estwick is recorded as saying that that the NIS is spending $400 million for two buildings (maybe I heard wrong).

    Did I miss the invitation for tenders on these buildings in the press?

  20. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    Bailey bridges: Panamanian scandal
    or merely a British business spat?

    by Eric Jackson

    It’s an argument and set of allegations that first surfaced in the British press, but has taken on a life of its own down here in Panama. It dates back to the Pérez Balladares administration, which could make it convenient for mudslinging in the context of a struggle for control over the PRD between former President Ernesto “Toro” Pérez Balladares and current President Martín Torrijos, but inconvenient for prosecutors or anyone else who might care to make a legal case of it due to statutes of limitation.

    The basic allegation is by Sir Jonathan Danos, who was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II for promoting British exports and who worked for Mabey and Johnson Limited (Mabey), the manufacturer of the prefabricated steel Bailey bridges, as its export sales chief until 2003. Danos then left Mabey to head a competitor company, Structural Steel Solutions (3S). Mabey and 3S are going after one another in the same Caribbean and Central American markets, with Danos apparently using his contacts made when he worked with Mabey to build 3S.

    Now Mabey is suing Danos for fraud, alleging that in bridge sales to the governments of Panama, the Dominican Republic and Jamaica Danos inflated commission payments, which he skimmed off for himself.

    Sir Jonathan’s defense? That Mabey routinely payed bribes of 15 percent to presidents, vice presidents and top ministers of the governments with which it dealt and then disguised them as commissions. And who was in charge of Panamanian purchases of Mabey bridges on Toro’s shift? That would be then Vice President Tomás Gabriel “Fito” Altamirano Duque. Fito Duque isn’t talking about this matter, and Toro’s flatly denying any and all wrongdoing.

    In 2001 the UK tightened its laws against the bribery of foreign officials, and the European Union now presumes that commissions paid to “finders” or other such agents in excess of five percent are indications of bribery. Toro, however, left office in September of 1999.

    The transactions in question took place in 1996 and 1998, and the big one, in 1997, involved an order for 17 bridges worth some $30 million. According to Danos, one Rogelio Dumanoir acted as Mabey’s agent in Panama, disbursing “commissions” into a Bahamian bank account, then through dummy companies held by Dumanoir and then — where?

    Dumanoir is a veteran PRD apparatchik, who served as minister of public works during the dictatorship. He did not, however, hold any position in the Panamanian government when Toro was president and he holds no public office under the Torrijos administration.

    The way it’s being played in some of the PRD-aligned press, the suspicion is being pointed at Dumanoir. But observers who were in the Panamanian diplomatic mission in London at the time and who otherwise served in the Pérez Balladares administration note that it was first not in character with that administration to allow kickbacks to flow to such minor figures as Dumanoir and second that it was Toro himself who insisted on a London contract signing ceremony with Mabey during the course of what otherwise appeared to be a minimally productive junket to Europe. Dumanoir maintains that he was a private businessman in his dealings with Mabey and that he wasn’t involved in any acts of corruption. He’s threatening legal action, whether in Panama or in the UK isn’t clear, over his reputation being impugned in the British and Panamanian press.

    Ordinarily, if Dumanoir, Fito or Toro took a kickback more than a decade ago, the statute of limitations bars any legal consequences for it. But there is the appearance that one of the contracts that was signed back then was for bridges that would be installed long after Toro’s time in office ended, including some that have yet to be built. In that case it would be a most unusual practice for any Panamanian administration to have signed such a long-term purchase deal. Moreover, if there was an act of corruption involved in a contract that’s still being performed, arguably the clock for the statute of limitations has not begun to run.

    So why all of this, and why now?

    It might just be a British company that’s losing business to a competitor headed by one of its former execs deciding to defend its market share through litigation, and Latin American and Caribbean politicians getting wounded in the ensuing legal and public relations crossfire.

    But might it be a case of British buttons being pushed in order to affect a power struggle within a Panamanian political party?

    Whatever it is, a dangerous game is being played here because both sides in the UK court case are offering public versions of the usually covert world of corruption in international public works contracts. If the impetus is purely British, then there is a reckless disregard for the foreigners who may be hurt. If there is a Panamanian hand behind this apparent scandal, it may be calculated to burn a rival faction more severely but it scorches the reputation of the PRD in general.

    Look for this matter to play itself out more openly in England than in Panama. But look for investigative journalism all over Central America and the Caribbean where Mabey and 3S do business, and a reasonable chance that this will spawn secondary scandals.

    Already in Barbados, for example, the British court case has journalists asking new questions about controversial bridge cost overruns in Barbadian overpass projects involving 3S. Meanwhile in Jamaica, the new Jamaica Labor Party government is using the UK allegations against its Peoples National Party opposition and Mabey is having an acrimonious breakup with its long-time agent on the island.

  21. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    Three countries three cases of outstanding and blatant fraud.

    Need I say or do more??

    Danos was brought to this island by the King of FRAUD AND CORRUPTION Steven Hobson and Hallam Nicholls do you need another reason to work out just what Owing was up to here??


  22. Ru4real, If you really believe that the “The public couldn’t give a monkeys about pre this and that” you are entitled to that opinion. The result of the last general election seems to suggest otherwise with 3S and the flyovers taking centre stage on the DLP platform.

    “They ask why did the MPT oppose and undermine the ABC project.” That’s your opinion but if they were dissatisfied it was most likely because of the underhand backroom award of the contract without following the proper public RFP/tendering process.

    “They SEE with their own eyes that which international traffic experts and engineers have being saying all along.” I have no problem whatsoever with the recommendations of the experts and engineers whether they be for flyovers, road widening, or any other solution or combination thereof.

    What I have a problem with is the unseemly and hasty selection of a company for a multimillion dollar project without going through the established and proper process of a publicly advertised RFP/ tender process.

    The question remains as to why there was no RFP/tender process. Dark Knight and yourself have been unable to answer that.


  23. That’s better WIV.

    Old news but good news.

    Now tell us about the forensic audits,
    we were told on the hustings heads would roll.

    Lets roll!


  24. Nostradamus

    with you all the way on your criticisms of the fiasco that was the 3S/Danos/flyover con game. However has a precedent been set? Have you seen a tender process for the buildings at Warrens? OK, Rotherly and Jada are reputable Bajan firms but are there laws, best practices etc that should be followed? WIV says the buildings should cost $100 million, I am fairly sure that I heard Estwick on TV say $400 million! (The ABC robbery was under $140 million). Here we go again!

  25. Wishing In Vain Avatar

    Straight talk // I just needed to remind them this joker Danos was an out and out fraud.

    I to am waiting to hear about a few cases to be tried before the courts, I know of one for sure that will make it there very shortly, as for Hardwood Housing not much was left behind so it maybe difficult to put the pieces together but that is the purpose of the audit.

    Places like SSA and BWA are two areas that come quickly to mind for action.

  26. Wishing In Vain Avatar

    Mabey faces further trouble as its former sales director, Jonathan Danos, has alleged in court papers that the company disguised secret payments to middlemen in its sales to Jamaica, the Dominican Republic and Panama to avoid official scrutiny.


  27. Wasn’t Danos acquitted in Jamaica?

  28. Wishing In Vain Avatar

    Danos is in turn being sued by the firm for defrauding Mabey by allegedly skimming off money in the deals for his own use.

  29. Wishing In Vain Avatar

    Not to the best of my knowledge the case is being heard in the UK courts

  30. Wishing In Vain Avatar

    While Danos is making accusations against the company, he himself is being sued by the firm for allegedly pocketing hundreds of thousands of pounds for himself in corrupt kickbacks on the deals.

    Mabey got a freezing order preventing the sale of Danos’s luxury home in Notting Hill, west London, last year and went to court. The high court said in a preliminary hearing there was “strong prima facie evidence” of fraud by him.

    But Danos, who was awarded the MBE in 2000 for services to British exports, has denied all the claims, and retaliated by filing a detailed account of the devices he alleges were used by the firm to get around anti-bribery laws passed by the British government.

    Excessive commissions are a common means of passing on bribes. As a result, British and US authorities generally frown on payments above 5%.

    Danos claims that he was ordered to divide an 8.5% commission to be passed to a Jamaican businessman, Deryk Gibson, into two parts – a commission of 5%, and another 3.5% for non-existent “local services”. He was also ordered, he alleged, to similarly split a 17% commission for a deal in the Dominican Republic, where the agent is named as a local businessman, Gilberto Pagan. In a third set of deals, in Panama, commissions were paid at 15%, he alleged, to a bank account in the Bahamas allegedly controlled by another agent, Rogelio Dumanoir.


  31. While you talk about childish things, the Barbados economy is in recession and this country is in peril.

    Neither Prime Minister Thompson nor David Estwick said anything during the recent Estimates Debate – because they do not have a clue.

    It therefore makes very silly listening when you compare what Estwick said at the St. Lucy Branch Meeting – with what he said during his presentation in the Estimates debate.

    Here is how former Prime Minister Arthur put it – as he described David Thompson’s 2009 Estimates:

    “Now Sir, these Estimates could be realistically supportable if you had a lot of concessionary financing available to you, to pay for it (and you don’t) if you go to the market and raise a lot of foreign exchange to cushion the impact of it (you can’t because the international capital markets are virtually closed) or if you could depend on there being a turn-around in Capital Inflows during the course of the next year (but you can’t).

    As you have seen a Paradise Sir, the market is even being closed to private investors.

    Sir, the most recent information tells you that this cannot be done.

    And since it cannot be done, do something else.

    And I am urging Parliament therefore to understand that this is the judgment that now has to be exercise.

    We have before us a government financial programme that is “UNIMPLEMENTABLE” because it cannot be financed. ”

    The question remains, how will Thompson finance his $745 million deficit?

    What will he cut. Never mind the two buildings at Warrens.

    The post office by Granny’s in Oistins was started too. The St. John Polyclinic also.

    Since the DLP is taking up people’s NIS contributions to pay for office buildings, at least good governance dictates that there should be a tendering process.


  32. Dark Knight, have to agree with you 100% that “Since the DLP is taking up people’s NIS contributions to pay for office buildings, at least good governance dictates that there should be a tendering process”.

    Wouldn’t good governance have dictated that there should have been a tendering process for the ABC Flyover project? Please enlighten us as to why there was no RFP/Tender.


  33. Nostradamus asked

    How did 3S become the first ranked firm? How could they become first ranked when there was no publicly advertised RFP or tender for a multimillion dollar project?
    ……………………………………………….
    I was not there but I suspect it was as a result of a “demonstration on interest.”

    As an ordinary citizen, and in the absence of: “The Freedom of Information Act,” which the DLP promised but refuses to implement – I can only speculate.

    But here is how it could have happened!!!

    The Government of Barbados signaled its intention to build a four-lane highway, improve drainage and construct over and under passes; flyovers – while at the same time, improving traffic flow; pedestrian and vehicular safety and lighting.

    A number of companies wrote demonstrating their interest.

    3S was recommended by the Evaluation Committee as the first ranked firm.

    First ranked because it had actual experience and could access the necessary financing (BOLT) because it was a reputable company in whom the bank had confidence.

    So you had an Evaluation Committee, which made recommendations to Cabinet and Cabinet gave directions to the establishment of an inter-ministerial committee and the rest as outlined in my earlier post.

    You do not seem to understand so let me “Speak English” as advised by hartley “the Klown” henry, a.k.a, Wishing In Vain:

    Imagine David Thompson and the DLP want someone to advise them on corruption.

    Wishing In vain, hartley henry, Nostradamus, The Scout and others wrote demonstrating an interest.

    Thompson asked for proof and it comes down to (short list) hartley henry and Wishing In Vain.

    harley henry says:

    I was the bag man for the Birds in Antigua.

    When I was younger I snatched old ladies pocket books.

    I robbed people and was even a three-card man. I demand a finders’ fee for the obvious.

    I can get money from potential investors for your campaign. I advise all of the corrupt governments in the Caribbean.

    I have been able to accumulate millions in less than ten years.

    Thompson says: Do not go any further hartley, you are the type of fellow I looking for. I believe you will be an asset to my pocket and the DLP.

    Now think clean thoughts and the opposite of hartley henry and you will see why 3S was the first ranked company.


  34. Dark Knight, as incredulous as your “but here is how it could have happened!!!” scenario sounds, I believe you!

    May I ask how the government “signaled”? How did interested parties know about this “signal”. My point has always been that the way you signal is by a publicly advertised Request for Expressions of Interest or Proposals and a tender process.

    We all know that this was never done and the question remains as to why not. That is the question we want you or ru4real to step up to the plate and answer.


  35. @ Nostradamus

    Imagine!

    The DLP took up $400m of people’s NIS Contributions to build two building, but cannot spend a few thousands to fix a computer system so that old ladies can get their pension cheques.

    So what is this about putting people first and being on the side of the people?

    How can the DLP take up $400 million of the people’s NIS money to build two buildings – at a time when old ladies cannot get their pension cheques?

    Imagine!

    The DLP promised change, accountability, transparency, good governance, integrity and freedom of information – and you are asking Dark Knight for information – that will not reduce the cost of living or save thosands more from going home!!!

    While you engage in childish foolisness, the DLP is reporting that it built six Roundabouts that already existed and constructed roads that were already there – for $20 million.

    And nobody is behind bars. $128 million on a road and roundabouts that were already there – and old ladies cannot get their pension cheques.

    How devilishly sinful.


  36. Just a simple question to Nostradamus question. Did the Public Accounts Committee ever function when the BLP was the last government? If not why not?
    Simple simple replies any one.


  37. @Dark Knight

    Imagine!

    The BLP took up millions of taxpayers dollars and awarded a contract to a company to build flyovers without going through an RFP/Tender process.

    Is that putting taxpayers first and being on the side of the people?

    And I have to agree with you that now it looks like the DLP is following in the footsteps of the BLP. The precedent was set in lack of accountability, transparency, good governance, integrity and freedom of information and the public can look forward to more of the same. The old maxim applies “the more things change the more they remain the same”.

  38. Wishing In Vain Avatar
    Wishing In Vain

    It is not an accident that the BLP opted for Danos 3 S after all he had all the features of the type they like working with some one with a track record of bribery and full fledged corruption.

    You must understand that Danos was the centre of three court cases a person cast among the BLP by no lesser than Hallam Nicholls and Steven Hobson what more do you need for evidence, this a corruption case made in heaven for the BLP.

    No amount of slithering and slimy action can remove the Parro and his party for that fact, we still await to learn where the small sum of $ 58 mil got lost to and in who’s account it has slithered and slimed its way into.


  39. Cuhdear Windbag
    You never was any good in creative writing at school wus you?

    Where you get all that trash from aint two words in it that true.

    I hope you aint hoping to go to heaven any time soon with all these lies on your soul.


  40. Shake-up planned

    4/30/2009

    By Shawn Cumberbatch

    BARBADOS is getting a social services shake-up.

    Minister of Social Care, Constituency Empowerment, Urban and Rural Development, Christopher Sinckler, revealed the plan yesterday, saying the Welfare Department, National Assistance Board (NAB), Poverty Alleviation Bureau, and Urban and Rural Development Commissions (UDC and RDC) were among the departments to be touched by major changes over the next seven months.

    Additionally, a number of new programmes and policies are being implemented, such as the introduction of a National Social Care Information Management System from tomorrow, to cut wastage and decrease inefficiency, the likes of which has seen the Welfare Department returning $36 million in unspent funds to the Treasury between 2003 and this year, including $11 million in 2008/2009 alone.

    Sinckler shared the news at the Lloyd Erskine Sandiford Centre during the official launch of the Country Assessment of Living Conditions – Barbados’ largest ever poverty study – which is being conducted in partnership with the locally-based Caribbean Development Bank.

    The initiatives being undertaken included:

    • initiating discussions with trade unions and the entire Social Partnership on proposed major structural changes to the controversial UDC and RDC, including rationalisation and
    upgrade of all existing systems and services, elimination of some and introduction of others deemed necessary.

    • a change to the laws which the Welfare Department and NAB have been operating under since 1969.

    • renaming of the Welfare Department and all agencies providing personal social services in Barbados.

    • major changes to the Poverty Alleviation Bureau, including incorporating its functions across the entire social services network.

    • establishment of a Task Force to Monitor and Strengthen the Social Safety Net from next month.

    High on the agenda for Sinckler was a major overhauling for the UDC and RDC, both of which he declared could not deliver Government’s social programme if left unchanged.

    The minister said having held the portfolio for nearly six months, he was now convinced it could not be business as usual for either agency.

    “I have seen UDC and I have seen RDC up front. I have experienced them. I have been in there. I have done Meet the Minister, I have met people who have been in there,[and] I think I have a fair sense of what is going on and I am of the firm and unshakable view that what currently exists will not deliver the Government’s programme, or will not deliver any government’s programme and there are going to be major structural changes down there, and I mean major structural changes,” he told the media during a break at the launch.

    He said the changes would start first at the UDC, and that officials wanted them implemented by the summer.

    “I think it is fair to give people an opportunity to prove themselves. I have given them as long as I have been minister … and I think you don’t have time to waste and now is the time to move and there will be some major changes, once the Cabinet agrees, of course, and I think there is a fair sense that everybody believes we need to make changes.

    We will speak with the unions, we will speak with the Social Partnership and other agencies that we need to speak with, but there will be major changes,” he added.

    Sinckler was also alarmed that increasingly large amounts money allocated to the Welfare Department had been returned to the Treasury over the last six years, and said not only was the entity getting an allocation of money based on its spending capacity from this year, but he had order a comprehensive review of the system.

    He said Welfare’s structures, policies, operations and staffing were in need of review. Additionally the official said he had issued instructions for Welfare officials to “make provisions for a five per cent increase” of people needing help, in case people lose their jobs because of the current world economic crisis.

    All of the above changes, he said, were based on new a new four-step framework introduced by his ministry. It will focus on identification and assessment, stabilisation, enablement and empowerment.

    Source: Today’s barbados Advocate.
    ——————————————
    BU Admin, let us talk about this, please.

    While it is true that the Report done some years ago by Roett and Joseph recommended a rationalisation of social servcies in Barbados – this is precisely what former PM Arthur wanted to do and what the then Ministry of Social Transformation was working on.

    This issue has become even more pressing for the DLP because it has to cut the social vote; raise taxes; send home people, bring new Estimates that can be implemented – all in an effort to find $750 million to finance this year’s Estimates.

    Still, the brightest in our society know that Government Revenues have been overstated.

    This is due to political incompetence; intellectual weakness, weak and systemic economic management compounded by a DLP brigade that made too many cardinal mistakes because (1) it is not ready, and (2) it does not know what it is doing.


  41. David Thompson has placed a “gag order on the economy” by using “hanging,” “deportation” and “defamation” as distratction tactics.

    David Thompson is weak on the economy so he is trying to downplay the fact those more than 3000 people lost their jobs due to his poor judgment and bad decisions.

    David Thompson is failing on his promise of: reducing cost of living, so he tries to get Barbadians to talk about Guyanese and hanging, as a distraction tactic.

    This is not leadership, but weakness.

    The DLP created a mess and now wants to blame Guyanese – instead of taking responsibility for its “political incompetence” and “intellectual weakness.”


  42. I want to start(buy) two fishing trawlers presently lying in India, Andhrapradesh, Visakhapatnam, and approxmate cost of the each trawler is USD 175000 ( Rs.80,00,000/-), I can repay the same to you with in the 4 years with nominal interest, I am in this field since last 16 years and I can not invest anything on this because I am poor but my views are not poor. So please answer me immediately how do you transfer the money to me and I can give my bank details to you.

    Best regards
    Narsing

    Looks like a scammer/spammer but we will leave it up to show what we have to be alert.

    David

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading