Submitted by BU Family Member
Having written before on the role of the Barbados Association of Professional Engineers (BAPE) and their criticisms of the ABC highway project in the run up to the last elections, what has been puzzling is its complete silence on the highway since then.
My primary concern is the “Wildey Merge Mania” where traffic coming from St. David’s that wants to go to Wildey must come to a junction which is structured that you must look OVER your shoulder to see oncoming traffic (which is coming at speed down a hill) to race forwards, to cross not one but THREE lanes of traffic in less than 100 meters. While at the same time contending with traffic coming from Collymore Rock that is doing the same thing (looking over the shoulder to avoid mainstream traffic and merging across three lanes) in the other direction! It is a miracle that no one has been killed in this madness.
To put the above into perspective, the distance available to merge across three lanes of traffic is LESS than what is available to people joining the highway in the Belle who only have to merge into the next lane and don’t have to deal with crossing traffic. BAPE raised a stink about the Belle junction, but they have been silent about the Wildey situation.
To quote from the BAPE’s position paper:
BAPE recommends that 3S be asked to provide information on the standards used in the design of this intersection, and examples of similarly constructed intersections they have designed elsewhere so that the consequential effects can
be examined.
No questions about the standards used in the Wildey situation BAPE? Why not?
My second concern is that having rightly raised the alarm about the tender process in the original highway project there is not even a whimper about the contract for the “redesign” of the highway, which the government issued to a former candidate(coincidentally also a member of BAPE)with no public tender. Further the Minister will publicly admit there is NO PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE for the project, but still the BAPE is silent on the matter.
In addition to this is the apparent abandonment of the idea of over or underpasses for pedestrians so now we have the prospect of a permanent arrangement where school children are crossing 4 lanes of 80 kilometre per hour traffic. Yet no word from BAPE on this either. Perhaps we should ask for “standards” where this is done elsewhere as well?
And after all of the above traffic still backs up on the highway! (Perhaps the PM might want to tell us what the cost of a flyover solution would be NOW?) I go back to my point in my previous post that it looks more and more like the Barbados Association of Professional Engineers was either
(1) playing politics itself,
(2) being used to further others political ends or
(3) just didn’t know what they were talking about!






The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.