Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

If kids come to us [educators/teachers] from strong, healthy functioning families, it makes our job easier. If they do not come to us from strong, healthy, functioning families, it makes our job more important.

Barbara Colorose

Minister of Education Ronald Jones  - Image Source Nation News
Minister of Education Ronald Jones – Image Source Nation News

The recent gaffe by Minister of Education Ronald Jones when he publicly chastised the actions of some school principals has rightly attracted the wrath of Barbadians. His public condemnation of one of the key stakeholders in the educational system cannot be excused. Education is one of the issues where a national consensus is mandatory; the desire by some to politicize this matter must stop. The education of our PEOPLE post Independence has been the vehicle that Barbados has used to overcome many of the challenges that confront nations, especially the developing ones. Its importance can be seen annually by the large slice of the budget which is allocated.

We have no doubt that Minister Jones is sincere in his desire to improve his ministry. He was a teacher and we assume must be acquainted with the challenges facing the educational system. However, arising from the current impasse it is difficult to fathom how Minister Ronald Jones can now commander the support and engender the confidence required from all the stakeholders in the education fraternity.

We believe he should do the honourable thing and resign.

Having stated the above we have to remind the BU family that the challenges facing our educational system did not begin on January 16, 2008. The hunger by other key players in the system to use the public forum to ventilate on sensitive issues is equally wrong and does nothing to build a team approach to problem solving.

What is so difficult for our educators to understand that we are at a critical juncture in the country’s socio-economic development, and education will have to play a key role to support the model society we want to continue building?

What is so difficult for our educators to understand that this is an issue that requires a consensus approach by the Ministry of Education, principals, teachers, parents and others to agree to a roll-out strategy to make our education system relevant?

If all the players were singing from the same hymn sheet then Minister Jones would have appreciated that saying what he did in the forum that he did was inappropriate. His gaffe followed that of the Chief Education Officer Dr. Wendy Griffith-Watson a few months ago when she slighted two of our schools on national radio, it generated a similar furore.

Our children who our educators are committed to serve are being sorely letdown. As long as the public bickering between the Ministry of Education and the other stakeholders continue; the impact on our educational system will be negative at a time when leadership is required in all areas of society. The children represent the future of a country; many have started to question the relevance of the current education system. Our children who have to suffer heavy criticism from society deserve better from our leaders in education.

The subject of education is dear to the hearts of Barbadians, we often boast of our 98+ literacy rate. Instead of the bickering we are hearing from the players in the education sector, we would prefer to hear of the solutions to address the lack of infrastructure to teach reading in many of our schools, how about the inefficiency of the criterion test which is given to Infants B pupils and the results are often not known until they reach Class 2, bear in mind that the criterion test is used to stream students. What about the large number of students who don’t PASS ONE CXC?

Barbadians seem fixated on the success of the block of students located at the pinnacle of the pyramid. A major disappointment has been the unwillingness of our educational system to prepare students for the changing world. The comfort level we still have to produce lawyers, accountants, sociologists and not enough engineers (scientists) and individuals who are prepared to be entrepreneurs. The vision and strategy for education must change to target the thousands of children who are being deposited annually by the current system with no skills.

Minister Jones if he is able to survive the current shouts for his head or his successor, the task to build a consensus approach in the important sector of education must become a priority. A nation of ignorant and illiterate people cannot be a good thing.


Related Blog

Time To Remove The Band-Aid From Education


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

118 responses to “Minister Ronald Jones And A Case Of Confidence”


  1. I am strongly against the unprofessional stance displayed by the CEO of education. How on earth can principals gain the respect from students when Minister Jones such a forum to cry them down and build up momentum to due to the clapping response from the students who now feel that the short skirts can be worn without being policed.


  2. (when Minister Jones used such a forum)

    I am of the opinion that Minister seems not to understand the usage of diplomacy. Remember when he cried down parents stating they love too much complaining. Education is crucial and we need someone who is firm and not crude. He even crossed the Rubicon and state that principal should be fired.

    I must say that students from every school really look like ladies in their uniforms…..now a stupid display of political arrogance might jeopardised all the work put in by principals. I give him a failing grade.


  3. Mr. Jones so often speaks before he thinks…and that is a major flaw of his. The recent public statements he made not only discredits the power of the principals but now leaves the children to have little or no respect for authority. His comments were made in the presence of the girls of the Springer Memorial School and they so gleefully responded with a thunderous applause (what does that speak to their future respect for their teachers and principal?)

    His stupid display of arrogance, clear disregard and authoritative bull-shit has left little or no room for a good rapport with the pricipals who he expects to work in cohesion with him.

    Sometimes it is people like Mr. Jones
    (who mind you was a teacher himself but sadly to say was not that priveleged to even reach a Senior Teacher post) might need to one day take a walk in a principal’s shoes and see just what they face with some of these unruly young people that form part of the current generation of students on this island.

    Mr. Jones is a mere reflection of the party to which he represents… a bunch of clueless assholes who thrive only on “change” at all costs without looking to address the real issues and who cannont think without seeing the YELLOW drowning what the RED has established!

  4. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    I like Jonesie. He calls a spade a spade. I support him on this issue.

    Can anyone tell me if Matthew Farley is the Chief School Principal in Barbados? Does the other School Principals have to do what he says?

    Who voted Matthew Farley into office?


  5. I don’t always agree with the Minister e.g. I think that he should step down as President of the BFA but according to the report which I read the Minister said that there are a number of Principals who send children home everyday for reasons unrelated to discipline. Question…. is this true? If so, there must be some bloggers who can provide a list of reasons why some children are being sent home. If the Minister is not factual then he deserves all the criticism directed at him. It seems to me that some of these Principals think that they are running mini fiefdoms, witness the recent contretemps between one Principal and the teachers at his school.

    Mr. Jones does not seem to be “the go along to get along” type of individual and this rubs some people the wrong way so I’m not surprised at the vitriol directed his way. Mr. Jones was even criticized for daring to suggest to some parents that they shouldn’t consider their children to be failures if they did get into HC or QC.

    Barbados has a lot of “sacred cows” criticise them at your peril.


  6. Why do people take this joker seriously?
    That’s what you get when you are on a populist agenda. One month you are trying to be popular with the teachers, the next month with the students, the next month with the parents.

    Sick and tired of dese _unts who feel that all of a sudden they got the right to speak down to the people of this country.

    The tone in which these guys are speaking is sickening!


  7. I think he was completely wrong to criticise the principals in front of the students. Even if he held the view that children should not be sent home that view should have been expressed in a forum with the principals where they could respond. Instead he has made an already difficult job harder.

    Anyone who has had the responsibility of taking care farther less teaching other peoples children in this day and age knows that it is very difficult to achieve discipline.

    Why this sudden concern about what could happen with children if they are sent home. That is a circular and stupid argument.

    If the head is sending home a girl because she keeps wearing her skirt short and her bubbies out why isnt the parent concerned about her being troubled on her way to and from school period! Why dont they insist that she follow the rules.

    I think alot of these issues fall under social work…not teaching and not education.

    I think people like Robald Jones and those looking for excuses should look to coming up with ways to raise money so that we can benefit from a better social work department where the heads can refer difficult students/family issues.


  8. I think Ronald Jones gotta axe to grind. As a teacher he was never promoted.

    He got a problem with the elite school system because he’s not a product of it.

    All of a sudden, from the morning of Jan 16 he got all the answers?


  9. Well that is Mr. Jones but I blame the previous administration because they are the source of all the ills in the country.

    I think we have to tell Minister Jones that the election is over and it is time to govern and be diplomatic.


  10. Mr Jones’ harsh criticism of headteachers in his address to the Springer Memorial School has done, in my view, irreparable damage to any prospect of cohesion in the management of secondary level education. He has surely destroyed any hope of detente or cooperation between himself and the principals and has made their already difficult task of maintaining discipline among their students nigh impossible.

    Even if principals have been breaking the “rules” by sending home students for reasons other than class disruption, surely the solution was not public chastisement in the worst possible forum. His demonstrations of arrogance, insensitivity and poor judgment disqualify him from the directorship of education policy in Barbados and he should be removed. An apology to the principals cannot undo the damage done and only by sending the signal to the students that it is standing with the principals can the Government do anything to ameliorate what is now an untenable impasse.

    Mr Jones has shown himself to be unfit to be the Minister of Education. What message does it send to students, visitors to our country and the world at large when the Minister of Education cannot even speak the English language properly. His constant mispronunciation of “thousand” and indeed every word which contains “th” disqualifies him from the post. I listened in horror on one recent occasion on national radio when he mispronunced in the most elementary way the word “chasm” twice in one sentence.

    Even in his recent railing against the principals, he wanted to know how they would respond if a student was sent home and some accident befell him or her between the hours of “nine and tree”. The man is an embarrassment to Barbados and its educational system.

    Jeanette Layne-Clarke gave him some gentle ribbing in a recent column in the Nation, but he has not taken or cannot take the hint. There is only one satisfactory solution.


  11. Unfortunately the situation has gone past whether Jones is correct or not. In Barbados we don’t have a history of our Minister resigning even though it is a tried practice in the Westminster Model we try to follow. As stated there is a crisis of confidence in the education sector.

    On a related line we never agreed with Jones wearing the heavy responsibility of President BFA. Even more strange is the fact that he received blessings from the PM on his decision.


  12. “sigh”

    This unseemly public spat between Minister Jones and Principal Farley indicates (at least to me) that neither of them have the power to effect positive change in Barbadian schools.

    Mr Farley along with other principals believes that adherence to a dress code (and other rules) will foster a more achievement oriented school. May I ever-so-gently suggest that the obverse may be a more effective belief.


  13. Help wrote ” I blame the previous administration because they are the source of all the ills in the country.”

    Do you really believe this?

    If you you need more help than is possible in this world or the next.


  14. The Devil wrote “Mr Farley along with other principals believes that adherence to a dress code (and other rules) will foster a more achievement oriented school. May I ever-so-gently suggest that the obverse may be a more effective belief”

    I’m with the devil on this one.


  15. The other point which we can discuss is the unfettered access which Mathew Farley has to the airwaves given his part time job at VOB radio. Ordinarily this would not be an issue to discuss but his preparedness to be outspoken, which is not a bad thing now makes it an issue.

    To what extent has his access to the airwaves position him as an opinion shaper. It is interesting that the very criticism being leveled at Minister Jones some may say that Farley is guilty of the same given how he orchestrated his response.


  16. I did not hear the full speech of Minister R. Jones. I will comment on only what I read here. To begin, I rarely hear a description of the role of a head teacher. I trained in 1966, and throughout my career it has always been likened to that of the captain of a ship at sea. He/she has to negotiate the pushes and pulls of the sea of education, sometimes the storms. The forces are numerous. Students, parents, teachers, teacher unions, the government’s Ministry, inspectorate/advisors, social services, research findings from academia, curriculum changes/innovations – I guess there are others. A good captain navigates it all and comes through safely and with respect. They do not attempt to turn the tide, or fight the storm. They weather the storm. Metaphors abound here.

    To the main point of contention here as I identify it from the posts so far, it is the issue of sending some children home because they are inappropriately dressed. I would consider this a matter of indiscipline. So the matter is the disagreeable behaviour of some students, which has already been passed for them to be sent home.

    Sending home under any circumstances is unacceptable, we may as well re-introduce walking the plank! Staff and physical areas in the school have to be provided, until parents or guadians can be contacted and the matter dealt with through a meeting of all concerned. Easy really, sailing a ship is not too difficult, otherwise we would be having far more ship-wrecks and mutinies on the high seas than we do have.


  17. This has become a very dark cloud over Min. Jones and the ruling government. This is the institution that produces our future leaders, it’s also the institytion that produces many dropouts and rogues in our society today. It makes it therefore imperative that people like Min Jones should attend Business seminars to learn the proper method to deal with this and other matters that will arise. Min Jones, as a teacher, was a bit arrogant,while in opposition, he became more arrogant and tended to talk down to the members and players in the BFA. Now as a minister, it is only obvious without the necessary trainiung that he would increase his arrogant and his ability to talk down to others.


  18. Secondly, one must remember that as President of the BUT, Min Jones had a number of “run-ins” with principals. He was just as ordinary teacher, now with the “big whip” in his hand, he sees it as his turn to call the shots. This shows a great level of immaturity, he must understand that he is in a very responsible situation and even though he has a point blasting principals in public to look like the “big Boss” is silly. I am not calling for his resignation, even though I think the job should be given to Min Todd, but I think as a pricipled person, he should meet with the principals and resolve the matter and then make a joint statement to clarify the matter. This should be done A.S.A.P.before the matter gets out of hand. Don’t forget we have irresponsible parents and children in society to deal with.


  19. Mr. Jones is correct, I finish school at Lodge in 1995 an I could relate to you the many horror stories visited upon students by past principles like Nickles (Noddy), Clarrie Layne, Desmond Browne and Ezra Barker. Nickles was the most brutle as he would beat students with anthing he gets his hands on, like an umbrella, bunch of keys or a hard slap to the face. As for Mary Redman, the union rep, she once told a student `come here fool’, stundent refused and was sent to be flogged. As a young parent, I would like to know that when my child reaches school age that she would be well taken care of. Keep defending the students Mr. Jones, because teachers got their unions………


  20. mad man
    Whether Min Jones is right in his opinion, the forum was totally out of place. Two wrongs don’t make a right.
    As the Minister, he needs to be more diplomatic about what he says and when he says it but that was his stye while President of BUT but he is now Min of Education and he needs to conduct himself in a more matured, professional manner. He need to be train in business protocol.


  21. @permres

    We big to differ with your analysis. The issue at this stage is not about sending home children, it is about the relationship between key stakeholders in the education sector to come together and chart a path for educating our nation’s PEOPLE in the best way possible.

    Over the years we have always had a tug a war relationship between principals and the ministry, since the revised act we sense the relationship has gone into the toilet.

    The analogy of two parents having an argument in the presence of their children seems appropriate.


  22. I did not hear the speech of Minister Jones, therefore my comment is general in nature, but underpinned with some experience of the Education System.

    It is unwise to upbraid senior staff – even general staff – in the presence of students it undermines authority, or to give the impression even unwittingly that Principals or Head Teachers are not doing as the Ministry expects.

    A letter under “confidential cover” to Heads is more appropriate, in an open forum the students could be told certain concerns have been expressed and the Ministry is addressing them.

    The education of our children or more mature students; is too important an issue for megaphone directives. A considered reflective approach is needed. Perhaps a quiet word in the ear of the Minister by someone with the authority to do so should suffice. If that fails to achieve a satisfactory outcome then the ultimate sanction is required, because it would be evident the transition to a specific Ministerial office is not within his compass.


  23. If your handle in any way describes you then to tell the truth, as a former student myself, I wid Nickles, le’ mah tell ya (sorry… fah real den). In any even there are rules that govern how heads carry out corporal punishment.


  24. Reading the reports in the Nation today, following a press conference with Mr Jones last Wednesday, it seems I was not far off the mark with my first post here. There is some suggestion that children are not being truthful with their parents, saying they have been sent home, when they are probably just bunking off.

    Mr Jones says all schools should have in place a development plan. This has been made law in the UK with their National Curriculum. Principals John Mascoll and Cobin Hinds say children should never be sent home without first contacting parents or guardians. A room and staff are provided at the schools until this has been done.

    Everything which has been reported in today’s Nation which has been uttered recently by Mr Jones makes sense to me. His public delivery might have been a little over the top! Keep on, Mr Jones, keep sending those waves in and get the captains to steer their ships to safety!


  25. Yardbroom

    It is unwise to upbraid senior staff – even general staff – in the presence of students it undermines authority, or to give the impression even unwittingly that Principals or Head Teachers are not doing as the Ministry expects
    *************************************
    Point well taken. If memory serves this wasn’t the first time that the Minister spoke about his distaste regarding the practice of children being sent home from school for reasons unrelated to discipline. Maybe he tried to engage the Principals through the resources of the Ministry and felt that his directives were not being adhered to… hence his public stance.

    I agree with David on his take with Farley’s unfettered access to the media both broadcast and print. The man is a Principal/social commentator/historian/politician etc. and is free to voice his opinion on anyone who can read or is within earshot of a radio. This may or may not be a good thing and I will leave it to others to decide but if his views on some aspects of education differs from the Minister and he goes public with them how should the Minister respond?


  26. The Scout
    I support your positions on many issues however on the issue of Minister Jones statement I will beg to differ.
    I support Minister Jones position on the abuse of power by some school principals.School principals should not be sending home school children for little infractions of school rules.I believe that many persons did not understand the point Minister Jones was trying to make.We all believe in law & order and the upkeep of it.We want our children to be discipline and respectful.The school principals are punishing school children because of the breaking of some school laws yet those same principals are breaking the guidelines set down by the Ministry of Education on how to handle suspension of students..As outlined by the Minister a school principal only has the authority to suspend a student for 10 school days and after that the Board of Management of the school only has the authority to suspend the student for another 10 days,but some principals are suspending children for longer periods than the specify periods set out by the Ministry of Education.You cannot be enforcing the law & breaking it at the same time.That is the conflicting,confusing signals that we adults continue to send to our children.We have policemen in Barbados who are swear to uphold the law abusing the authority entrusted in them by beating & brutalising people children & at the same time want the same people to uphold the law.
    We must stop being so hyprocritical and setting double standards.
    I support Minister Ronald Jones position 100 % and Minister Jones you do not have to apologise to a boy.You are right.The abuse by principas like Matthew Farley must stop.We elected you & your government to set a new direction in this country and you all must carry out that mandate.


  27. Mr. Jones is wrong to speak so aggressively about principals in front of a student body. The students were thrilled when they recognized that here was a person with responsibility for education scolding the persons that scold them for reasons which they don’t perceive to be wrong such as wearing short skirts, coming school late, fancy hair styles, nail polish, wearing brand name soft shoes, pants falling off, cursing teachers, insulting teachers, pelting at teachers, gambling, using drugs, having sex at school only to name a few. Teaching is going to be an endangered species shortly. Do you see how upset parents are when they children have to be at home? They know the trouble they get into but teachers see that trouble every day. Every forty minutes they are exposed to thirty different individuals from different environment which different behaviours. It is a challenge where few persons want to be involved with. Let the ministry keep running them away.


  28. There is a time and place for everything and obviously Minister Jones in an effort to show who is in charge chose the wrong time and place to flex his arrogant muscles.
    Matthew Farley is the only principal on record who sends students home for those things and if Jones has a problem with how Farley does business at the Garrison he should take it up with him and the union.
    Mr Jones needs to cut some of his arrogance and work with the other stakeholders in his ministry


  29. We read in today’s press that Minister Jones has promised that every school will have to present a strategic plan.  Does anyone know if a strategic plan has been enunciated by the ministry? We would imagine that this must be the case since strategic plans by individual schools would have to roll-up to an overall plan.
    The other concern we have is the long muted continuous assessment to have been introduced to the service. Has it been rolled out/will it be rolled out?
    The final concern has to do with the inability of the government so far to provide the necessary support for the teachers to diagnose dyslexic pupils. We received a note from a concern patient who wants the ministry to bring this matter under the umbrella of the ministry. Currently teachers/parents have to pay the Caribbean Dyslexic Centre out of their own pockets to help children suffering from D. It appears to be a significant problem and may explain why many children are not able to read in our schools. the scary part is whether many of the teachers feel competent to identify the problem of D.


  30. oh please…the Min was flat wrong.

    Mr Farley does not send home childern willy nilly…

    How many of you have dealt with these parents and their children?

    Do the schools ahve the facilities to hnadle so many bad behaved children?

    Are You saying that the rules should be abolished?

    If so are you prepared to handle the consequences?

    Do we have tha facilities to manage these children in the schools . If we dont is that the heads fault or the ministrys???
    Waht about the parents and children taking some responsibility?

    Are schools baby sitting facilities??


  31. Ronald Jones would want to get upset if someone suggest that he has a pronounced feminine side, such as the BLP election 2008 election platform suggested. We all should know of some instances where Two seperated parents, not on speaking terms would say all manner of negative things about each other to their off-spring.

    Did he not expect to get a tongue lashing from the School Principals for his unprincipled provocation? Could he not have dealt with this via private conversations and only with those Principles who have so acted? and sending a general memo reminding others of the law and their responsibilities?

    However I think he has a point, as this action demonstrates a double standard for government, where the law provides for Teacher/school reponsibility and safety of the student during school hours. Such responsibility and safety cannot be in place when children are sent home, and are on the streets during school hours. In some societies this situation is dealt with by having the parent pick up the child, as a rule. A complete transfer of adult supervision and responsibiliy at a time when the law is clear who has charge. The child will stay in the principal’s office or some designated area until the parent arrives. The continued practice can never be what is occuring now, when students need to be dicipline. Matthew Farley was right for diciplining those students who broke the dress code, he was wrong for having children in his responsibility, on the streets at a time when the LAW says they are under his care. If a Principal had done that to my child, i would seek a audience with them (Principal) to let him know that i am suppose to be called when the need to have that child leave school inside the time that it is suppose to be there, occurs, because continued failure to do so would result in a lawsuit, for, if my child is injured on the streets during that time, I cannot gaurantee that all hell for Mr. Farley would not break out. I like to live within the law, and working out problems, with others via communication, but when others take it upon themselves to flout said law and to remove themselves from accessibility and compromise, and such action disadvantages me , then my own form of justice will be front and center on the table of choices.


  32. Negro Man
    While there is some merit in what Min Jones said, the time and place to say it was wrong. I maintain, if he felt so strongely about the matter, a meeting with the principals and cuss them out, I could live wiyh that but not in front of the daid school chidren in the first case and then have it reported on T.V for all the others to see. This method degrades the status of the principals and gives the school child the support to challenge and in some cases ignore the instructions of the principals. This can cause chaos at some schools.Additionally, it also gives some stupid parent to go to the school and accost the principals. Finally, some principals might just go through the motion and allow the students to do as they please at school. Thre MUST be a balance and I suggest that the powers that be come together A.S.A.P trash out the matter, take what ever steps are needed to resolve the matter and then make a public joint statement and put this potential explosive matter to rest. Show some maturity; both entities have interest in the children’s future.


  33. But what if he called you on several occassions, what if he sent letters to you on several occassions ? What if he did this and your child still did as they wished?

    So In my humble Opin there a need fro a more active social work service to deal with these situations…the principals can only do so much.

    So celarly there is a need for everyone to work together instaed of the MIN crying down the principals.

    Mr Farley is not the problem… instaed poor parenting and poor management of vulnerable groups needs to be addressed.


  34. Is Mr. Farley breaking the law by working at VOB?I thought the General Orders said that civil servants cannot do ny other work for pay.


  35. Mathew Farley has indicated several times that many of the children who are sent home he would have been trying to contact some of the parents for over 2-3 years. When asked what would happen if a female pupil was raped when she should have have been in school he suggested that the matter would have to resort to the law courts.

    We however agree with me that some positives can come out of this mess. The schools have a challenge dealing with some of the monsters who we have to call students. We all know that parental delinquency is at a all time high given the restructuring of the modern family i.e. both parents away at work getting home late etc. Many of the teachers/principals are unable to teach.

    Lets fix the damn system, it will call for ALL to come together and stop with the breast beating.


  36. @ Fair Play

    General orders my ass! How many teachers give private lessons and earn money on de side?


  37. at schools at lunchtime and arter school using the schools resources and equipment……


  38. I believe we must stop playing politics with the future of our children.Mathew Farley & Jeff Broomes must put their political allegiance aside and be professional enough to recognise that the education of our children is paramount.The very existence of black people in Barbados is dependent on the continous education that our children & grand children receive in the future.The signs are there to destroy the gains we have made as black people in Barbados.Remember the call by some elites that education in Barbados should not be free.
    We are talking about discipline in schools and the punishment that should be given to students that disobey the school rules.This society is so damn hyprocritical that it makes me sick.At Queen College school the school children there are just as wicked,disruptive & illdiscipline as at other secondary schools.There are cases at Queen College school where students cursed teachers,threatened them and in some instances physically assaulted them.I know of a case where a teacher had a homosexual relationship with a school boy.He was in the habit of taking advantage of that school boy when the cadet corp of that school went on overseas trip.That case was never highlighted in the press.Neither the abuses those students at that prestigious school did was ever bought to light.The teachers at that school were and are powerless to do anything about the bad behavior of those students.The simple reason those students are the children of the powerful,rich & influential people of Barbados.No damn black teacher at Queen College has the courage to suspend or enforce any discipline on those rich people children.Talk about hyprocrisy & double standards. As usual I want anyone to come & dispute these allegations.What I am sayin is the gospel truth.I will put my life on line .
    Do any of you all think that if Matthew Farley was the principal of Queen College would he has the balls to suspend any of those rich people children for any infraction of the school rules?
    Why didn’t the press of Barbados carry any further stories on the student at Harrison College who went on the school’s roof?
    I wonder why


  39. LOL as usual some idiot on here throws up smoke screens…

    What does QC etc have to do with the issu at hand? Why must we always bring sin other issues to distarct from the central issue?

    I went to an Older secondary school and people were sent home as well, some ended up at Dodds.

    What is the point?


  40. I am reading this thread with great interest. I have been a school teacher for nearly 40 years, secondary trained, and with primary and infant experience. Negroman, I think, makes many very relevant and pertinent points.

    However, the issue is not black vv white, or any other confrontations, but what sort of education do we want for ALL of our children? It may be a case of looking at the private sector, seeing what they have to offer, and using their practice to influence our government schools. This is already happening in the UK. I am impressed by the Codrington School here in Barbados:

    http://www.codrington.edu.bb/cs/public/default.asp

    I am now retired but I hope and pray that decisions will be made, at the highest levels, to ensure the world-wide education of our children. Please, everyone, look at the curriculum of the Codrington School. (And do not dismiss it as a ‘white’ school.)


  41. I am reading this thread with great interest. I have been a school teacher for nearly 40 years, secondary trained, and with primary and infant experience. Negroman, I think, makes many very relevant and pertinent points.

    However, the issue is not black vv white, or any other confrontations, but what sort of education do we want for ALL of our children? It may be a case of looking at the private sector, seeing what they have to offer, and using their practice to influence our government schools. This is already happening in the UK. I am impressed by the Codrington School here in Barbados:

    http://www.codrington.edu.bb/cs/public/default.asp

    I am now retired but I hope and pray that decisions will be made, at the highest levels, to ensure the world-wide education of our children. Please, everyone, look at the curriculum of the Codrington School. (And do not dismiss it as a ‘white’ school.)


  42. I think you should direct the Minister to look too!


  43. Did we hear on the news that Patrick Todd is acting minister of education? Where is Minister Jones? Hope he is not in Jamaica watching football at this critical period. Please correct us any member of the BU family!


  44. Mr Farley, what is wrong with you? You got a sex problem or something? When you took over the school it seemed to be all about dress code, especially the girls. OK, but going to school is all about education, and that is what you should address. Consider this for example. Plump students, when they sit their dress will ride up, but slender students, they can pass your test, I guess?

    Take your eyes off the girls, and put your eyes on the education of all of your students! You should be in the army, not running a school, and do not deprive the children of their education, and keep your eyes off the young girls’ legs!

    PS. You cannot send them home, you are depriving them of their education, even if you have to keep them in a separate room. That’s an experience in itself, surely! Far better than them wandering the streets.


  45. @J

    Sarcasm……I was being sarcastic so don’t try to banish me to outer space…..my friend

  46. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    “Currently teachers/parents have to pay the Caribbean Dyslexic Centre out of their own pockets to help children suffering from D.”

    Did this start since Jones became Minister of Education?


  47. @CCC

    Don’t miss the point we are making. All we are saying is that there are many deep rooted problems to be solved which requires a big effort by all the players in education. This bickering, breast beating and grandstanding is doing nothing positive to assist.


  48. I support Minister Jones position on the abuse of power by some school principals.School principals should not be sending home school children for little infractions of school rules.
    ………………………………………………………
    Negroman. We must all be cognisant of the fact, that children comes home with all types of accusation against schools. But do we check with the schools to clarify the problems or we behave like the lady in today’s Nation (Page 17) where she was accusing three different schools for sending home her three children for various causes. However the three schools responded with three different reasons citing that the school did everything possible to assist these kids. These children were hell bent in not attending school and gave various reasons not to attend school.

    This bring us back to Mr. Jones accusing these principals for sending home children.What he should have done, was to find out the true reason why children are on the road between 9 a.m and 3 p.m. He will be surprise with the findings.Unfortunately,he already burnt the bridge of reasoning with his outlandish behaviour, only to have a press conference to give his reason. Are we going to see statements and then retractions of statements? Stupes!!!!


  49. Negor Man
    You’re missing the point. It is not whether Min.Jones or Mr Farley is right or wrong but I maintain Min Farley is wrong to use a forum like that to say what he said. he should have called the principals together and trash out the problem. This is not a Farley issue ALL school principals feel belittled by the comments.


  50. Is Mr. Farley breaking the law by working at VOB?I thought the General Orders said that civil servants cannot do ny other work for pay.
    …………………………………………………………….
    Good question. Farley is a law unto himself. Does he do what he is paid to do? The substantial time Farley spends courting publicity in the media and elsewhere should be spent teaching the nation’s kids. Thats what he is paid to do. Farley is involved in everything except teaching.

    And that voice, oh my God. I wish Farley would shut up so I wouldnt have to hear that whining irritating voice of his .

    Jones has a point but making it in front of children wasnt bright. Jones urgently needs to undertake a remedial course in English and diction. Dese, dose, dem, dat, thrildren, are alright with the fellows under the tamarind tree but not for a Minister of Education.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading