Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

image

A confidential document seen by Barbados Underground (BU) has implicated a Democratic Labour Party candidate nominated to run in the upcoming General Election in some rather murky activities. The investigation dates back to nearly 10 years.

From our inception, we have been reluctant to carry stories which may promote character assassination. However, in this instance, we feel that in the interest of truth, our commitment to freedom of information and transparency of our democracy, this story MUST be told. We have taken a position not to publish it in its entirety until such time when we have received a legal opinion to satisfy some of our concerns. We urge the BU family to appreciate our decision because of the confidential nature of the document.

It is no secret that there is a widely held view in Barbados that people from certain minority groups have been allowed to reside in Barbados, and on closer examination have been known not to speak a word of English. Also they have had very limited relationships with people in Barbados. We have written previously about the unwillingness of the responsible government agencies to inform Barbadians about the true number of legal and illegal Guyanese on our island. We are now convinced that the government before CWC 2007 had no efficient mechanism to gather such information. We have come to the conclusion that the Barbados immigration system is in need of massive reform which would prevent it from being manipulated by groups in our society who have money and influence. The document in our possession refers to the authorities having knowledge of female spouses who are not able to understand the language of their respective Barbadian husbands. The heavy suspicion by authorities that the females participated in a marriage of convenience for money was listed as a concern in the document.

image

What we find very disturbing is the notion that our authorities have had serious concerns about access to sensitive information within the Immigration Department by low-level employees. One member of the BU household is more concerned at the idea that a low- level employee was thought to have maintained uncomfortably close relationships with immigration officials. Taken at face value, this is a perception which may seem harmless, but when fitted with what we have observed with the large immigrant inflows into Barbados, we should continue to be very vigilant even in the face of being accused of xenophobia.

image

The document confirms that the key reason behind the racket to the marriages of convenience by a certain group in Barbados was to facilitate their applications for business travel to the United States of America by showing evidence of ‘Barbadian status and Residence’.

image

We will bring it home now.

It appears from our reading that a current candidate in the upcoming election has been fingered as one of the persons involved in this illegal activity of Marriages for Sale Scam which dates back nearly a decade. Before we make more information public, we are prepared to give all the information which we have to the Leader of the Opposition for his full investigation. We believe that it is in the interest of the Barbadian public that he should open an internal investigation into the candidate selection by his party. Many of our commenters, Adrian H especially have joined BU in the cry for political reform. It is not sufficient that we place an X every five years in an election; our democracy must become more embodied in all that it perceived to be just. Politicians are critical agents in our system of government; therefore the screening and selection process of our political parties must be rigorous to eliminate those individuals who have questionable reputations. The recent pronouncements by both parties concerning the need to introduce integrity legislation are appreciated. We are fully aware this is the silly season which means that it is the right time to make promises to an apathetic electorate.

We give David Thompson three (3) days to indicate to Barbados Underground if he wants the information which we have, before we do the required follow-up story.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

113 responses to “Democratic Labour Party Candidate Fingered In Confidential Memorandum”


  1. ha ha ha ha
    THE SPEAKER OF HOUSE IS NAKED, except for his RED party hat.

    ——————————————————–QUOTE
    More evidence why our system of governance and in particular our parliament is such a farce. Here you have a speaker of the house who is suppose to be impartial in rulings, and in his interpretation of the standing rules of the house, yet he cannot bring himself to take off the shackles of his party membership, and affiliation.

    Just as the concepts and actions that are characterized by the statement “Justice must not only be served, It must be SEEN to have been served, so too, should the actions of the Speaker of the house must not only be impartial, and be to the letter of the rules, he must be SEEN to have been impartial and act to the letter of the rules.

    In one breath he refers to the rules as clear as they relate to the procedures, and in another he accuses the parliamentarian who happens to be a member of the opposing party, of taking advantage of a section of the Standing Orders “that was not very clear”. They are clear and yet not clear.

    Why is there a big issue at this time for this BLP politician masquerading as an impartial arbitrator of debates in the people’s house?… He goes on further to wear his party hat while on the throne on high. He claims that he is disturbed, and that a great disservice has been done to the house by the way the matter has been taken to the public, and to bring him into it, to give the impression that he has not done what he was supposed to do.” I hope that he is suggesting that his disturbance is caused by the way it was presented to the public and not that it went before the public in the first place. He can see, apparently, with his BLP party blinders on, that this revelation to the public is not right, yet his own actions of discussing a private member’s correspondence with him in his capacity of the Impartial speaker, he in turns, discusses it, with the Leader of the House;… and what would be at cause for him to so do? His party allegiance is the same as that of the leader of the house is it not?

    This man who would want us to look no further than the silly regalia he wears and the silly monotone speech pattern he delivers his utterances in, and ignore the glaring fact that his party allegiance will always come first and that like all others before him, he has demonstrated the inability, to be truly impartial, and to truly adhere to the rules as they are. That he would now at this time and to the convenience of the Political party of which he is a member, make the statement that a resolution is not to be determined on the outside.”, but is willing himself to look outside of our parliament into the parliament of Trinidad to institute a stop gap rule to deny an Opposition parliamentarian the use of a process that has precedent in that chamber. Mr. Speaker while you are identifying rules that are clear and then not clear, and now seems to see something wrong with a private member having the ability to debate his/her resolution at a time of his chosen, what is your opinion of the constitutional law that allows a prime minister the right to call elections at a time of his choosing? What says you? Just like a no-confidence motion is no trivial matter so too is an election, is it not? Mixed government of the kind we have is a farce, a continual enigmatic Pantomime, where the responsible and those not responsible are all the same.

    My opinions on the system of government we have is justified in the action and statements of the Speaker of the House as informed by the Nationnews paper and the following articles

    Adrian

    http://www.barbadosforum.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=6939&view=findpost&p=67434


  2. Worse Adrian:

    He accuses Thompson of not acting in accordance with a Rule that exists in the Eastern Caribbean but not in Barbados! There is no 12 day rule or principle in Barbados.

    When the DLP site has the speech of David Thompson from that massive Sunday night meeting, you will see why Roett is in a pickle. Thompson undressed him with one line!


  3. I am not confuse by the meaningless titles people give to themselves in parliament. The record for me on Tuesday the 27th of November 2007 sitting of the house will always be that Thompson took on two BLPites and took them to task.

    That so desperate and exasperated are they that just as the consititution is not safe in their keep so too the standing orders of the House will now be change to convenience them. The practice is clear.

    ….That whether it is an attempt to change the law against buggery that would benefit some of it’s members

    Or an attempt to suspend the constitution for political gain in the upcoming election.

    Or to change the standing orders to force an MP to bring a private member motion within a specified number of days.

    …This BLP government has demonstrated what it will do and the depth it is willing to go to legitimize it self and to win an election.

    ….But no matter the outcome, these occurance will not change in my eyes nor in my opinions.

    Mia Mottley will always be Frank, it is her nature to be.


  4. Mia Mottley will always be Frank, it is his nature to be.


  5. Leviticus // November 28, 2007 at 5:01 pm

    Worse Adrian:

    He accuses Thompson of not acting in accordance with a Rule that exists in the Eastern Caribbean but not in Barbados! There is no 12 day rule or principle in Barbados.

    When the DLP site has the speech of David Thompson from that massive Sunday night meeting, you will see why Roett is in a pickle. Thompson undressed him with one line!
    ———————————————————–
    I spoke to that at the end. This is Roett, Blp member supposedly functioning in a non partisan role in the house. We also have a Chief Justice that walk out of the title, David Simmonds MP BLP st. Thomas into the clearly defined role of head of the seperate and independent arm of governance, the Judicary. I am not going to be easily convince that should the DLP form the next government and attempts to carry out the justice that several members of the current governmet party clearly needs to answer for that he too will not be found to be naked except for his RED party hat.


  6. He accuses Thompson of not acting in accordance with a Rule that exists in the Eastern Caribbean but not in Barbados! There is no 12 day rule or principle in Barbados.
    …………………………………………………………………….
    Did Thompson not admit the 12 day rule and how he still have time even when the House commence sitting next week.


  7. frankology // November 28, 2007 at 7:23 pm

    He accuses Thompson of not acting in accordance with a Rule that exists in the Eastern Caribbean but not in Barbados! There is no 12 day rule or principle in Barbados.
    …………………………………………………………………….
    Did Thompson not admit the 12 day rule and how he still have time even when the House commence sitting next week.
    ———————————————
    ha ha ha ha ha Boy trust you find anything to use as a get away car. I watching your contributions closley bacause it looks to me like you can entertain a serious and lenghty debate with me. 😀

    So when did he say this? and in what context? was it in response to the Ishmeal Roett MP BLP St. Michael central, contention of what pertains in other countries?

    Or did Thompy make the claim as a result of learning that such rules are in our standing orders?

    My take on this is , if he did indeed say what you contend, is that the 12 limit is not at this time enforcible in our parliament,

    ….that Ishmeal Roett MP BLP St.Michael Central has hinted at the possiblility of making a change to our rules to reflect this limit; and in so saying caused Thompy to retort “well if thats is the case i will have a further 12 days from the time this new limit comes into play”.

    …..Am i about correct, close but no cigar? 😀


  8. So when did he say this? and in what context? was it in response to the Ishmeal Roett MP BLP St. Michael central, contention of what pertains in other countries?
    …………………………………………………………………….
    Thompson might have been in receipt of the other island’s 12-day rule, and responded to the speaker that if it is on last Friday’s order paper, he still within the 12-day period if it starts next Tuesday. That is his statement – not word for word.

    Adrian, Saturday and Sunday included within Parliamentary days?

    Looking at the behaviour of the Speaker, certain members of both parties, even the views of somem commenters; nobody seems to be aware of this 12-day time factor. I doubt that it is enshrined within our Parliamentary System, no wonder the speaker was hinting for a response in having it made law.


  9. Adrian, I keep saying that I respond to the writings of commenters and any loop-holes I jump on. I do enjoy having clean discussions with you folks.


  10. frankology // November 28, 2007 at 9:56 pm

    So when did he say this? and in what context? was it in response to the Ishmeal Roett MP BLP St. Michael central, contention of what pertains in other countries?
    …………………………………………………………………….
    Thompson might have been in receipt of the other island’s 12-day rule, and responded to the speaker that if it is on last Friday’s order paper, he still within the 12-day period if it starts next Tuesday. That is his statement – not word for word.

    Adrian, Saturday and Sunday included within Parliamentary days?

    Looking at the behaviour of the Speaker, certain members of both parties, even the views of somem commenters; nobody seems to be aware of this 12-day time factor. I doubt that it is enshrined within our Parliamentary System, no wonder the speaker was hinting for a response in having it made law.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Frankology nothing Thompson has said done up until the Speaker made mention of other countries 12 day rule, would give anyone any idea that Thompson knew of the 12 day rule. Why should he? this is Barbados where no such rule exist. It is likely a response, if he did say what you contend that it was in response to the Speaker’s hint at changing the rule.

    But Frankology are you not in the least concern about the number rules, laws, and regulations that this BLP party has demonstrated a willingness to change? and that when look at closely as to why the changes are needed, it always seems to benefit them the most? no concern?

    What are you views on the right of Barbados to hang person on death row and the fact that a Judge in different to our laws invoke some convension and or treaty that Barbados may signed or agree to that prohibits hanging? You think a our laws should superceed any foreign convention or law?


  11. We suppose to be an Independent nation, and our laws should supersede foreign conventions even if that country force any embargo on us if we had to make a decision to hang someone once all laws are adhered to. We must show them that our people are rallying behind our laws (forget party partisanship).

    Adrian, Thompson is smart, he has parliamentary gurus of the like of Sir Erskine who would have been versed with such no-confidence motions; and he might have been knowledgeable to force the hands of the Speaker and Ms. Mottley. He knew how far to antagonise these people, yet, he did not put himself in a position to play at the wrong ball. I would like to know if the 12-day rule in other countries, includes Saturday and Sunday; or even a bank-holiday. Please advise.


  12. Frankology we listened to the debate and Saturday and Sunday was included in the count by Thompson and the Speaker. From this we can assume that this is the case in the other Caribbean islands where it exist.


  13. frankology // November 29, 2007 at 10:15 am

    We suppose to be an Independent nation, and our laws should supersede foreign conventions even if that country force any embargo on us if we had to make a decision to hang someone once all laws are adhered to. We must show them that our people are rallying behind our laws (forget party partisanship).

    Adrian, Thompson is smart, he has parliamentary gurus of the like of Sir Erskine who would have been versed with such no-confidence motions; and he might have been knowledgeable to force the hands of the Speaker and Ms. Mottley. He knew how far to antagonise these people, yet, he did not put himself in a position to play at the wrong ball. I would like to know if the 12-day rule in other countries, includes Saturday and Sunday; or even a bank-holiday. Please advise.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    But Frankology if you agree that as a sovereign nation our laws should superceed any foriegn ones, why would you AT THIS TIME be interested in knowing what applys in other jurisdictions with regards 12 day limits on private members resolutions? Are you equally as concern about what pertains in some countries as to the certainty of an election date?

    I have no interest in what Trinidad House rules say, uh mean we are not quite yet an annex of Trinidad.


  14. Frankology,

    You can always be counted on to SPIN like your other BLP hoodlums !

    There is no 12 – day period to debate a NO – CONFIDENCE MOTION in Barbados !

    The SPEAKER said in the House on Tuesday 27th November 2007 that Barbados may have to look closely at implementing a 12 – day rule that now exists in some other Caribbean islands.

    It was on that note that David Thompson……rightly PROFFERED the view that even if a 12 – day rule was in existence in BARBADOS for such a MOTION…..his ( David Thompson’s ) MOTION would still be within that time frame counting from 23rd November 2007 !


  15. Jerome Hinds // November 29, 2007 at 11:09 am

    Frankology,

    You can always be counted on to SPIN like your other BLP hoodlums !

    There is no 12 – day period to debate a NO – CONFIDENCE MOTION in Barbados !

    The SPEAKER said in the House on Tuesday 27th November 2007 that Barbados may have to look closely at implementing a 12 – day rule that now exists in some other Caribbean islands.

    It was on that note that David Thompson……rightly PROFFERED the view that even if a 12 – day rule was in existence in BARBADOS for such a MOTION…..his ( David Thompson’s ) MOTION would still be within that time frame counting from 23rd November 2007 !
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Man Jerome leave Frankology to pursue whatever line he choose, when he comes here he will have to demonstrate depth in his pronouncements. 😀 we all may learn something if we allow ourselves. 😀


  16. Only a small percentage of the world continue to uphold the death penalty , with China carrying out the most deaths. Back in 1948 when the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted, since the United Charter only discussed Human Rights in general terms after it was created shortly after the Second World war to curtailed unnecessary deaths. Since the UDHR inception, 118 member states have abolished the death penalty, stating that “everyone has the right to live”.

    In 1996 a new treaty, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) was adopted encouraging the abolition of the ‘death penalty’ whereas the UDHR was monitoring the dealth penalty by allowing only serious crimes.

    This is where I appose these treaties, noting that these same people you are trying to represent, also took a life; and if the law was used to sentence these people to death, we should not have any treaties hanging over any countries head in carrying out that country legitimate position in applying the death penalty. Remember, why sould you take a life and now someone protecting you from giving your life.


  17. You can always be counted on to SPIN like your other BLP hoodlums !
    ……………………………………………………………………
    Jerome, I am no spin doctor, I am not here to defend the Bees, I am not here to defend the Dees, as a matter of fact I have no intentions of voting at the next elections. Reason, both parties have the same ideologies, with family members that are all entwined, who eat at the same table, drink at the same bar, invited to the same parties; and hop on the same plane and enjoy holidays together.

    …and poor old me, you tink I am goin’ to crucify them, or bused them, or call them names. Boy, you all must be kiddin’….that’s why I prefer to deal with issues as I see them.

    So Jerome and others, sorry to disappoint you again and again. I am no BEE.


  18. We get it Frankology we get, in this intance you agree that our law should superceed foreign ones or conventions. Now is this a conviction of yours that All of our laws should be treated the same with regard to outside influences? Now this is not to say that we cannot use the proper channels to amend our laws to meet the needs of a changing Barbadian society. Would you agree that the same principle with regards hanging should be apply to the rules of our parliament?


  19. It was on that note that David Thompson……rightly PROFFERED the view that even if a 12 – day rule was in existence in BARBADOS for such a MOTION…..his ( David Thompson’s ) MOTION would still be within that time frame counting from 23rd November 2007 !
    …………………………………………………………………….
    This is the same thing that we were discussing. We seem not to have this 12-day issue within our procedures, thus the reason of the speaker sending a spark for our parliament to adopt or maybe, reduce the time frame.


  20. We must as a nation adopt laws that suits our people, I am not talking of waking up a morning and changing laws for your own political gains, but to embrace all sectors of the community before making such a decision. Remember, one simple language that might have a double meaning might change the outcome of an action. Definitely, our laws should supercede any outside influences.


  21. In regards to hanging, some influential people within the judiciary systems are fully opposed to the death system, and that’s a fact, some are members of, or affiliated to, such Human Rights organisations like Amnesty International. This I believe might be the reason for the lengthy wait in carrying out the death penalty, thus the excuse of Pratt and Morgan to the rescue of these condemn murderers.


  22. frankology // November 29, 2007 at 12:24 pm

    We must as a nation adopt laws that suits our people, I am not talking of waking up a morning and changing laws for your own political gains, but to embrace all sectors of the community before making such a decision. Remember, one simple language that might have a double meaning might change the outcome of an action. Definitely, our laws should supercede any outside influences.
    ———————————————————–
    So to your mind does the Ishmeal Roett MP BLP St. Micheal Central comments about what obtains in other countries sounds like an intent to change or impliment rules for political gain? If not why not?


  23. Adrian Hinds // November 29, 2007 at 12:51 pm

    frankology // November 29, 2007 at 12:24 pm

    We must as a nation adopt laws that suits our people, I am not talking of waking up a morning and changing laws for your own political gains, but to embrace all sectors of the community before making such a decision. Remember, one simple language that might have a double meaning might change the outcome of an action. Definitely, our laws should supercede any outside influences.

    ———————————————————
    Are any of these person any different than Ishmeal Roett MP BLP St.Michael when they willingly want to ignore our laws and look to outside conventions and rules so guided by personal affiliations, interest and convictions?

    Will you join with me in saying that Ishmeal Roett MP BLP St.Michael is wrong, partisan, and using his office for personal gain? 😀


  24. So to your mind does the Ishmeal Roett MP BLP St. Micheal Central comments about what obtains in other countries sounds like an intent to change or impliment rules for political gain? If not why not?
    …………………………………………………………………..
    I don’t think that he is one who demand change, being the speaker and seeing nothing within our parliamentary system of ‘time to debate a no-confidence motion’. I feel that it is pure embarrassment that Barbados do not have any laws regarding this subject, thus, the reason for him to see it implemented.


  25. We just had a good shake from an earth tremor


  26. frankology // November 29, 2007 at 1:26 pm

    I don’t think that he is one who demand change, being the speaker and seeing nothing within our parliamentary system of ‘time to debate a no-confidence motion’. I feel that it is pure embarrassment that Barbados do not have any laws regarding this subject, thus, the reason for him to see it implemented.
    =================================
    Frankeulogy: You don’t think the Ishmeal Roett mp BLP St.Micheal Central is the one calling for the Trinidad 12 day rule to be brought to bare in Barbados Parliament and on a specific Private Members resolution, that happens to be a No confidence motion? Well what are you thinking?????

    I love it when persons with an agenda resort to “thinking” and “feeling” and “believing”when current rules and current laws in place do not afford them a clear path, to continue, a partisan viewpoint, and to effect a favoured outcome.

    …It isn’t about national embarrassment, It isn’t that we don’t have laws on the subject, it is and has always being about Ishmeal Roett mp BLP St.Micheal Central, opining as he did, simply as a BLP member doing what is in his political party’s best interest.


  27. Adrian, You are correct, why would he have gone down that path for knowing full well that there was not such requirement in the laws of Barbados more deception placed on the people of Barbados, it was a cheap dishonest act, but we should be familiar with the blp style of dishonesty by now surely???


  28. We would like to apprise you on the promise we made earlier this week to release the confidential document in our possession. We regret to inform you that after careful consideration and legal consultation we have been advised that the release of the follow-up article, which we had planned to release today, three days after our initial revelation, might infringe on national security and be detrimental to Barbados and others.

    We hope that you understand our position that this is a very sensitive matter and must be treated accordingly.


  29. man if i get dat article atol i posting um, simply bcos keeping things like that secret, is aiding and helping breed corruption in de country, let de ppl know wa gine on. if um did a regular man or woman, ya wudda see dum backside gine before de courts, even if u had ta do seing but wunna ministers doing things, and wunna backing dum up, wa i wanna see if wunna get in any trouble if dem gonna come and get wunna off, stop hiding de damn politicians doings, when wunna suffering, dem dont even shite pun ya


  30. yea, my blog hay soo>>> kadriwalcottonline.com/blog

    cant be frighten fuh na corrupted people if ya closet clean 🙂


  31. David Says:
    We would like to apprise you on the promise we made earlier this week to release the confidential document in our possession. We regret to inform you that after careful consideration and legal consultation we have been advised that the release of the follow-up article, which we had planned to release today, three days after our initial revelation, might infringe on national security and be detrimental to Barbados and others.

    We hope that you understand our position that this is a very sensitive matter and must be treated accordingly.
    ————————————————————

    David come clean on who advise you to such? You have allowed BLP people to make a fool of you, and now you are allowing Notes from the margin and one James to somewhat influence you on what Blogs should be. You need to reflect on the reason why you started this Blog, assuming that you came by those reason on your own, and use them as a your guiding light going forward. I still maintain that you should let it out as long as you give your opinion on the political affiliation of the source, and I hope you realize how dangerous that source is, that they would risk interanational fallout to all Barbadians for political gain, which leads me to believe that this source is steep with BLP connections as this is in keeping with the actions of this party willingness to risk all to retain the government. Nothing is sacred with these people.


  32. Kardi Says:
    man if i get dat article atol i posting um, simply bcos keeping things like that secret, is aiding and helping breed corruption in de country, let de ppl know wa gine on. if um did a regular man or woman, ya wudda see dum backside gine before de courts, even if u had ta do seing but wunna ministers doing things, and wunna backing dum up, wa i wanna see if wunna get in any trouble if dem gonna come and get wunna off, stop hiding de damn politicians doings, when wunna suffering, dem dont even shite pun ya
    =================================

    Aint that the truth. We have had reports of certain young men going before the law courts of Barbados for stealing large sums of money from various institutions, and we have seen mainstream media reports on these incidents along social class lines.

    case in point, Raul Ward stole large sums of money from Sagicor the story was carried without one photo of Mr. Ward.

    Randolph Sandiford stole 300,0000 belonging to the crown, and his photo was publish.

    Whats the difference? Raul Ward is from the heights and Randolph is from Spooners Hill.


  33. This current Barbados government via it’s powfull foolish Minister of Foreign affairs and it’s Prime Minister, once from the floor of parliament, accused the United States government of threatening to invade Barbados much as they did Iraq. Otto Reich and others have not forgotten, the stupidity of that incident,… they further took to treating the former US ambassador like school child over a mix up of arms arriving at GAIA and which were destine for another caribbean country. This GoB has always held a hostile position towards a friendly nation, and this revalation of citizens of Barbados breaking the Immigration laws of the US and being known to the Government, and the government withholding this information for 10+ years speaks to the low value that they have of any relationship with the US. I think in the least the US should withhold the promise aid to the caribbean nations in helping to resettle their deported citizens. I can also remember the treatement that Jennifer Lazzlo a US citizen recieved at the hands of this current GoB. The demonstrated practices of this regime are clear in how it percieves and treat to it’s relationship with the U.S.A.

    Post the article let me see if the Federal authorities will ignore it.


  34. You don’t think the Ishmeal Roett mp BLP St.Micheal Central is the one calling for the Trinidad 12 day rule to be brought to bare in Barbados Parliament and on a specific Private Members resolution, that happens to be a No confidence motion? Well what are you thinking?????
    ……………………………………………………………………..
    I do not have that opinion. He just mentioned the Trinidadian issue, but he was not trying to motivate any one to bring a motion to correct the problem. Surely, he would be committing speaker’s suicide if he try to in cooperate a time-rule motion within a no-confidence motion.

    Just a reminder, I do not have any agenda, and I am far from being partisan.


  35. Cou Cou & Flying Fish – Keeping it on the down
    Published on: 12/1/07.

    AFTER A CERTAIN MEETING earlier this week it is unlikely that there will be much exposure given to a certain grouping in the next few weeks.

    Cou Cou understands a big boy was summoned, on Monday and told of a grouping which was seemingly always in the face of the people.

    According to inside sources, the big boy was told that it was becoming “too much” and that the time had come to cut back on the exposure since it was a delicate time.

    From now on, the speaker said, “you cannot put abroad certain things!”
    =================================

    Who is being discuss here? Any ideas on who the players to whom the article refers???

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    =================================

    WRONG MAN IN POST

    THE ELDERS do not believe that the current boss has picked the right man for the job in a certain riding.

    They believe he has been tried once too many times without a positive result and he should have sat this one out.

    The individual in question, however, rates himself like a fast bowler who was one of the few West Indians with enough heart to take on the Australians in that ill-fated 1975 to 1976 tour.

    The truth is that he must have a strong heart, having gone under more than once already.
    ===================================

    Who is being discuss here? Is this about John Boyce DLP 3 time looser at the polls??? Who???

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    ===================================

    OUT OF THE LIMELIGHT

    DON’T BE SURPRISED if a well-known face in certain circles disappears from the scene for a few months.

    Cou Cou understands that the person in question is more than a bit concerned about what has been taking place in his stomping ground where a certain lover boy has been making the rounds.

    Don’t wait on the whistle to blow, this guy is giving himself a red card.
    ===================================

    Who is being discuss here? Is it Ronald Jones or Jerome Walcott? I think it is Ronald Jones, as i have heard some reports that are similar to the gossip in this article,…plus whistle and Red cards are soccer signals which is Jones is linked too.
    ===================================
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    MONEY MAKER

    A CERTAIN CAMPAIGNER has come into a lump sum of money that he never expected.

    Apparently, a benefactor is disappointed that the insiders have not given him the support he expected for a project close to his heart, and so he is ready to switch sides.

    It was a low moment for the insiders since the financier had quite a few bucks to share around provided he got the backing he desired for his project.
    =================================

    Who is being discuss here??? This sounds like something going on in the Deacons farms, any ideas?

    ==================================
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    IT’S HOT IN HERE

    A WELL-KNOWN personality whom one would expect to be in the clear, is reportedly in the red.

    And sources say this could spell trouble for his future in his chosen field.

    An early favourite to take the cake in a St Michael riding, this silky-voiced campaigner has reportedly bitten off more than he could chew and is finding it hot even when standing in the shade.

    It has now reached the stage that every time he pays his bills, it must be legal tender.
    ==================================

    Oh please tell me that Chris Sinclear isn’t in money troubles, …..how could that be??????

    ==================================
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    PEPPERPOT OF LICKS

    A ONE-TIME PARTY FAITHFUL is saying it will be licks like pepper in a certain St Michael riding in which she was once interested.

    Sources told Cou Cou that this damsel in distress is not at all happy with her former bossman and has decided to switch sides.

    Then again, what is a rice and stew if there is no pepper.
    ==================================

    Marilyn Rice Bowen is now a Bee???? wow.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    ==================================

    DISAPPEARING ACT

    NOTICE THAT a certain heavyweight has not been on recent platforms?

    Well, insiders report that the big-ups are not certain what position this pint-sized dynamo will take once he steps onto the stage.

    Guess they have decided to let sleeping dogs lie.
    ===================================

    Is Dennis Kellman thinking of starting his foolishness again????

    I love this gossip column,…..but why the onesided focus today???? you mean to say that even you are now caught up in partisan politics? Let we hear bout some uh de tings gine on in de BLP. Um all can’t be rosey and well in there. 😀


  36. Someone speaking to Denis last week says he was feeling surrounded, and things should be made clearer this week.


  37. Adrian, Denis Kellman has been responsible and effective as an MP and on the DLP platforms. This is typical of puddin’ and souse gossip. Denis Kellman was down to speak on Sunday and he spoke in Fitts Village too.

    Don’t let that worry you. I hear all politicians saying they are frustrated all the time. Opposition politics is not easy but the Dems will soon be in government. Mark my words.


  38. i personally feel dum shud tek saddam body and tie strings on he and mek he prime minister of buhbadus, call all dum is nuttin but puppets.

    i am a strong blp supporter, but ta tell de truth, dum still int clean, but i guess daz human nature, always want to live above dum standards, if ya pay dum $20 a munt, dum gon buy a lil 13 inch Tv, if ya pay dum $1000 a munt, dum gonna buy a 60 inch plasma, always rememba dem politrickions like ta know dem living big life, but wait and see when hard times start ta hit man, dum int gonna got na big boy nor lil boy, from drought like wa de usa got now, ta famine, den diseases, and man gonna be just fuh heself mo dan how um is

    thompy cant stop doing wa he doing bcos uh 2 tings, one is dat ya must got a oppasition fuh a elecshun, and two he is a politicul assbert.

    i gon share dis lil cartoon wid wunna watch um and laff wunna belly full

    thompson and he hardwood
    sum uh wunna mussie see dis but still watch um

    http://www.kadriwalcottonline.com/blog/?p=14


  39. Kadri,

    Now THAT is damn HILARIOUS!!!!

    🙂


  40. We have two new sets of trouble – Carmel & Mooze or Carmel is Mooze.


  41. frankology for once we agree.
    They need to addressed and dealt with.


  42. lol if wunna gone fight at least lemme get some pop corn ya


  43. This kind of activity is always hard to prove as the action and interaction of married persons differ depending on circumstances in their lives. This could be one of the many reasons the investigation is 10 years old and nothing has come of it to date. BU I think you have to be careful about this topic because it may just sound juicy because of who the person/s are now but would we have taken a second look at it if this was a story about some plan Joe.

    Immigration has a job to do and I for one think persons need to follow the law and go about gaining their status in a law abiding manner but I find we are quick to attack non nationals and even more so if the person is from the Caribbean region when it come to migration. We haven’t seen the document only BU has so until I see clear evidence pointing to reasons why they think these persons are connected to any wrong doing I don’t care to know who it is. I think to often speculation and personal opinions of a writer get printed and this taken as fact / the gospel truth by the reader. I’m just saying this in general not talking about any writer or reader in particular.


  44. http://www.kadriwalcottonline.com/blog/?p=14

    So Kardi beyond its comedic value is there anything else about this video clip you have notice? Is the comedic value only at the expense of Thompson? Or can you implicate if not include Mia Mottley?
    1: by noting that the first voice over use to poke fun at David Thompson is the Mia’s voice?

    2: The first Question at the very beginning “GOT WOOD? Seems to be question that Mia Mottley is asking of Thompy?

    3: That the twin peak mountains or hills that Thompy is seen traversing are in truth and in fact Mia Mottley breast, and the green peaks are indicative of her, overflowing, with lust and want of a Man,.. This is an innate need that she has continually denied herself.

    4: Freud has a lot to say that I think explains Mia confusion with this video, her subconscious denial of her innate needs and wants are being manifested in her obsessive concentration on thompy’s wood, stick and limbs. So to her she thinks she is making fun of Thompy, but to me she is unwillingly letting out her repress feelings.

    ….Thompy does not meet with Mia Mottely behind the Speaker’s chair again. 😀


  45. This kind of activity is always hard to prove as the action and interaction of married persons differ depending on circumstances in their lives.
    —————————————

    Difficulty in so doing should never be seen as impossible, and so you can find interesting ways to lessen it’s occurence.

    US immigration laws demands that a marriage of the kind being discuss here, to be consummated. The burden of proof is on you. There is also a wait period, and there must a collection of evidence to substantiate a legally entered union, including and not limited too, joint banking, investments accounts, mortgage etc, references from notable persons in the community, including notary publics (US justice of the peace) etc.
    ====================================================================
    This could be one of the many reasons the investigation is 10 years old and nothing has come of it to date. BU I think you have to be careful about this topic because it may just sound juicy because of who the person/s are now but would we have taken a second look at it if this was a story about some plan Joe.
    The real reason it is 10 years old, is to be found in the beginning sentences of the first three paragraphs of the so called smoking gun evidence.
    Paragraph 1:
    “I have been given some reliable information about…..”
    Paragraph 2:
    “He is the one who engineered a legal document for…..”
    Paragraph 3:
    “I have been informed that presently Mr. X is in financial trouble”
    This smoking gun document is written by the typical hi-fuh-lootin Bajan who thinks Job title and station in society affords them the right to make equally hi-fuh-lootin statements to be masquerade as the truth. There is no corroborating evidential document to substantiate the remainder of the comments that followed the above hearsay beginning sentences. This is assuming that it is indeed a real document from the Dept. listed on it. I say assumed because this smoking gun document has as much authenticity as a Nigerian scam email. Therefore I believe that it could have easily come by the same way that other smoking gun documents appeared on the BLP’s blog.
    Duguid you know anything about this one? 😀
    …..Rather than turn such a document over to my Congressman and Senator as proof of wrong doing on anyone’s part I am more incline to turn it over to the subject of what is to my mind pure hearsay.
    Until proven otherwise, I will believe that this came straight from the BLP.


  46. I will not speculate. What I do know is that those who live in glass stones ought not to throw stones. This said, I invite you to relate to the following:

    Do you remember when Philip Greaves was Leader of the House and his presence did not go unnoticed over a number of no-confidence motions? Do you remember his soul-searching words (not sure he has a soul with the series of public about turns he has been known to make) when attempting to defend his political ally in Brandford Taitt? Greaves said that allegations which culminate in a parliamentary censure of the Minister and Member of Parliament “are things which are very damaging to people and I think we have to be very careful with following up rumours and elevating rumours and innuendoes to a position of fact and then proceeding on that basis to prosecute some person without any clear evidence.” It seems that on the 2nd of December 2007, these words no longer have meaning. Believe it or not, this is the very Greaves that took apart Dr. David Estwick, presumably based upon some modicum of a principle, on national radio (VOB) about two years ago. Where have those principles for his jaundiced understanding of fair play and political ethics disappeared? Is the rhetoric we hear today from this man Philip Greaves who considers himself an ‘elder’ in the DLP?
    Let us go further and make some connections with the self-created debacle that Thompson is so busy trying to challenge the BLP, the Prime Minister, and Clyde Mascoll, not on the basis of fact but on innuendo and ridiculous technicalities. Does going to places like Deacon’s and Fitts Village not contradict the point that Greaves makes when Greaves convincingly said that “because they [politicians] have access to the newspapers of this country, they feel they can destroy people’s characters, as they have been doing in a number of editorials in this country on this particular matter and on other matters. I am saying that this kind of attitude, this kind of approach, is wrong and we should not as parliamentarians encourage that kind of behaviour or development in our political system.” It sounds almost as if Greaves was trying to teach David Thompson a lesson then and now. Has the course of ethical direction changed because Greaves is no longer a parliamentarian? Thank God that Greaves, Taitt, and other persons of the same ilk have gone. It is very likely that Barbadians and the DLP may be much better off without the fluctuating tongues of Greaves and the current excuse for a political leader in Thompson.
    While Thompson came on VOB Sunday’s Brass Tacks (2nd December 2007) and promulgated again in public with what he deems to be political savvy, Barbadians were exposed to another fact that the pastor misrepresented his conversations and discussions with the Deputy Prime Minister and Leader of Government Business in the House. Lest we forget, it was Greaves back then in 1993 that concluded “it is important that we do not use the occasion [in serious parliamentary debate or the general public forums afforded politicians] … to destroy people and to convey the wrong impression to the public.” I wonder if Thompson knows that he is masquerading as a statesman when he is but a mere inheritor of fortune. The case against Thompson’s perpetrations and oral infelicities are substantial enough that Messieurs Kellman, Sealy, Jones, Lashley, and Estwick should be gathering at the time of writing in the hope of finding a man of integrity and truth to lead them in the next general election, unless they too want to be painted with the same confusing and circuitous brush.


  47. Adrian Hinds // December 2, 2007 at 1:18 am
    ….Thompy does not meet with Mia Mottely behind the Speaker’s chair again.

    Reply:
    This seems to be a favourite meeting spot for these two…


  48. Mr. Resilient, the problem with you all is that you have David Thompson stuck in your craw. Why?

    Face it, he is a master strategist. I have to give it to him. He has public support and he created a storm in a teacup that overtook the whole country.

    And he has taken out Mascoll to boot!


  49. And, Leviticus, he has the whole country talking and has raised an issue that has the highest number of hits on this site.

    Wow!!

  50. Such Stupid Comments Avatar
    Such Stupid Comments

    Leviticus ….Face it, he is a master strategist. I have to give it to him. He has public support and he created a storm in a teacup that overtook the whole country.

    ………………………………………………………………..

    Ha ha … Somebody acually believe tha TOM PEE is a master strategist.

    You need to be more analytical. After 20 years in the HOA what has TOM PEE to show to suggest that he is a master of anything?

    After winning Barrow safe seat as a young man what has TOM PEE to show to the people of St. John? You must remember that TOM PEE took over ST. John when the DLP was in Government and was enjoying its largest Mandate. What is his achievement?

    TOM PEE became a Minister of Finance and this master strategise presided over the worst period of economic management know to this country.

    TOM PEE the master strategist became leader of the DLP and then lead them to the worst defeat ever.

    TOM PEE the master strategist is the only leader of the DLP that had to borrow money to run an election and still owes bills up to this time.

    TOM PEE the master startegist go rid of Patrick Todd to replace him with Pandor.

    TOM PEE the master startegist brought in Jennifer Lazlo to work along side Hartley

    And now you admit that this master startegist, after all the talk about Hardwood has only created a storm in a teacup. So Much for re-branding, so little for strategy

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading