← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Key Points of the 2026-27 Budgetary Proposals and Financial Statement as delivered by Minister of Finance Ryan Straughn on March 16, 2026.

  • This is the first Budget being presented by this Government while not in an IMF programme. Barbados has regained control of its economic future. The country is on a stronger economic footing.
  • Barbados remains in a stand-by arrangement with the IMF.
  • Debt to GDP ratio was at 99.8% at October 2025; at January 2026 now 93.3%.
  • Barbados is now off everybody’s lists – it meets international standards for transparency and financial regulation.
  • Adjustments were made to Budget to respond to current global challenges – for example, corporation tax assumptions reduced by $200 million.
  • Unemployment rate at all-time low of 6.1% at end of December 2025.
  • Central Bank expected to report next month 19th consecutive quarters of growth.
  • $728.5 million spent in fuel imported last year.
  • In past two weeks Brent crude has risen from US$64 per barrel to just under US$106.
  • Over next 3 months, hedge for Bajans with oil price locked in at US$92 per barrel – 80 000 barrels per month.
  • From April 1, Government will absorb 50% of increase in Fuel Clause Adjustment for next 3 months. It will cost Government $7.9 million.
  • Government cutting VAT and excise tax caps on fuel. From April 1, cumulative reduction of 15 cents per litre at the pump.
  • They are not permanent but to deal with the current crisis.
  • To businesses: Identify your energy wastage and fix it.
  • During COVID-19 in 2020, country imported $519m in fuel. Last year it imported $728.5m.
    • From April 1 to March 31, 2027:
  • To extend Excise and CAT holiday on electric vehicles
  • Cost of replacement batteries for electric and hybrid vehicles will be eligible for the five-year personal income tax deduction
    • Shipping bunker surcharges:
  • For 20-foot containers – from US$200 per container to US$700
  • For 40-foot containers – from US$400 per container to US$1400
  • From April 1, Customs and Excise Department to cap value of 20-foot container at US$3000 and US$6000 for 40-foot container.
  • Reverse tax credit to increase from $1300 to $1700 from April 1 for those earning up to $25000 per year.
  • Eligibility threshold to increase to $35000 and those beneficiaries will receive $750 in reverse tax credit.
  • Two dedicated Gun Courts coming – one dealing with offences committed in the last year and the other with the backlog of cases.
  • All purchases of GPS and dashcams systems for vehicles to be duty- and VAT-free on importation to Barbados for one year.
  • Customs duties and VAT to be removed for one year from importation of CCTV/security systems.
    • Goods imported for personal use through registered couriers:
  • • Tax-free amount raised from $60 to $150
  • • From $150.01 to $199.99, duty-free and only VAT payable
  • • Anything over $200 in value, Customs duty and VAT apply
  • Excludes items like alcohol, cannabis products, cigars and cigarettes
  • A $500 fine for false declarations or under-invoicing
  • Government announced the launch of the Green Industrial Gateway Advantage (GIGA) – to create thousands of new, high-value jobs.
  • This is projected to raise the country’s foreign earnings from US$700m to between US$4-6 billion annually within a decade.
    • Multi-birth cash grant:
  • • $300 per month for twins (up to age five)
  • • $600 per month for triplets and more (up to age five)
    • Barbados Republic Child Wealth Fund
  • • $5000 in trust per child born after November 30, 2021.
  • • The just-concluded Estimates have set aside $52.1m to cover current amounts. It is estimated to cost $10m-$12m per year going forward

Source: Starcom


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

49 responses to “Highlights: 2026 – 2027 Budget”


  1. The government should take credit for the ‘healthy’ economic indicators. The blogmaster’s comment: we are a one leg economy; once the global economy recovers, everything will be fine. The test will be how we handle the ongoing shocks from the Iran conflict.


  2. If the figures are correct, we are well on the way to catching up with Switzerland and Singapore. Our national debt is already lower than in hellholes like France and the US.

    We are a rock in the storm. The world is burning and we are standing by and watching. Soon the rich Arabs will be begging us to let them holiday here.

    Still, we shouldn’t get overconfident. The removal of import duties on electric cars and the increase in the duty-free allowance for Amazon and other online retailers are causing our foreign currency reserves to melt away like ice in the sun.

    Tron
    fair and balanced

  3. Wednesdays off Avatar

    Sri Lanka has declared every Wednesday a holiday for public institutions to conserve fuel as the island nation grapples with possible shortages in the wake of the US and Israel’s war with Iran.

    Nearly 90% of all the oil and gas flowing through the strait last year was bound for Asia, which is the world’s largest oil-importing region.
    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g5n58rlnzo


  4. So what I got a problem with in this budget is government shifting the responsibility from themselves over to the citizens.

    This dash cam talk will do nothing to address the thousands of drivers out there without insurance. What wunna doing about that as its an enforcement issue not a citizens issue?

    Secondly all the talk about duty free cameras for crop thiefs does not address the problems about revising the laws to make the penalty for tiefing more serious. Again what wunna doing bout dat?

    Thirdly all the talk about 2 gun courts ain’t saying pang. Why I did not hear that effective April 1st all gun related crimes will no longer be a bailable offence? Why wasn’t the law being changed to make first offenders of illegal gun and ammo possession a minimum of 5 years at Dodds?

    Once again all we are doing on the above is dancing around these issues by offering political fluff as a solution, while shifting the responsibility from the state to the tax payer.

  5. Terence Blackett Avatar
    Terence Blackett

    @THE BLOGMASTER

    WITH NO OPPOSITION TO REPRESENT THE OTHER FACTION OF THE PEOPLE IN BARBADOS – WILL THE “MASSES” SWALLOW* THE SPUNK FROM WHAT IS A JERK-OFF BUDGET

    Again, please “EXCUSE” my extremely “CRASS” allusions & innuendos on a topic that is blatantly pertinent to the “POOR”, “MARGINALISED” & those who live “HAND-2-MOUTH” because they are the “INVISIBLE MAN”!!!

    I want to “PULL APART” this “JACKASS BUDGET” – but the “SUN” just came out & I have work in the garden that needs my immediate attention!!!

    #SoStayTuned


  6. back to the future ?

    “Last Thursday, the Cabinet of Barbados agreed to re-engage the original company, who has already done all of the design work on the path forward for the construction of overpasses,” Straughn said.”


  7. CAN THE GOVERNMENT OF BARBADOS CONTINUE TO “twist” THE FABRIC OF REALITY WITHOUT DIRE CONSEQUENCES? THE VERY ACT OF “twisting” IS THE REPURCUSSION, AND IT CREATES RIPPLES THAT EXTEND FAR BEYOND THE INITIAL POINT OF DISTURBANCE

    In quantum mechanics, “REALITY” is not a “FIXED”, Newtonian clockwork. It is a dynamic, interconnected field of potentialities that only “COLLAPSES” into definite states when “”OBSERVED and/or “MEASURED”. To “TWIST” this fabric means to intentionally influence quantum states, to choose one potentiality over another…

    THIS IS A BASIC LAW

    In quantum mechanics, the “OBSERVER” is not “PASSIVE”. The act of measurement participates in creating the reality being measured. This means that you cannot stand outside the system you are “twisting” – neither can you become entangled with the reality you are observing or how the “twist” affects you as much as it affects the system itself…

    In the philosopher’s version, the “SEER” and the “SEEN” are one…

    When a quantum system is in “SUPERPOSITION”, all possibilities exist. When you measure it, you “COLLAPSE THE WAVE FUNCTION” into a single reality. That collapse is not “REVERSIBLE”. You cannot “UNCOLLAPSE” it. You have “CHOSEN A PATH”, and other paths are now forever unrealized…

    The Bible captures this “REALITY” in Galatians 6:7: “Do not be “DECEIVED”: God “CANNOT BE MOCKED”. A man “REAP” what he “SOWS”.” This is not just moral instruction – it is a description of how reality works at every level, including the quantum level…

    In my recent discourses on a wealth of issues, I have traced how the gathering storm clouds in the Middle East will create vulnerability for small island states like Barbados…

    As the groaning of creation in weather, geology, and human affairs intensify – the “CRACK” in the “OLD WORLD ORDER”, is now setting in “COW WILLIAMS CONCRETE”, and will have dire effects on all of us…

    The “6-DEGREES OF SEPARATION” that bind us all “TOGETHER AS ONE” – in a quantum reality adds a deeper layer, where the “CRACK” or “FISSURE” is not just political or economic – it is ontological!

    When Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, it is not just an “ACT OF WAR” – it is a “TWIST” in the fabric of “TIME-SPACE DISTANCIATION” that reverberates instantly to every corner of the entangled system…

    The 250% increase in shipping container costs for Barbados is not an “ECONOMIC SIDE EFFECT” – it is a quantum repercussion, where the distant effect of a local disturbance, transmitted through the entangled web of global trade, energy, and finance, creating “DISRUPTION” that will reverberate over an untold period of time…

    The [46] days without sunshine in Scotland, as I purported a few weeks ago, is not just weather modification or whatever suppositions one chooses to attach to it – it is the groaning of creation, (YES), but it is also the visible manifestation of invisible connections…

    The “CHILD WEALTH FUND” unfunded liability, is not just bad budgeting – it is a failure to account for entanglement, the assumption that the future will look like the past, and that the web will hold…

    Every thought, every action, every “BUDGET”, every war, every hedge against oil prices – these are all twists in the fabric…

    They all propagate. They all entangle. They all create the world we collectively inhabit…

    The only question that remains is, what kind of twist are you making?

    A twist of greed propagates scarcity…

    A twist of fear propagates conflict…

    A twist of love propagates healing…

    A twist of faith propagates hope…

    The Child Wealth Fund is a twist…

    The fuel hedge is a twist…

    The Gun Courts are a twist…

    The GIGA is a twist…

    They will all have repercussions, some visible now, some hidden until the wave function collapses later…

    The wisdom traditions and quantum mechanics agree on one thing – you cannot opt out of entanglement…

    You can only choose what kind of entanglement you create…

    The crack is now set…

    The connections hold…

    And every twist matters…

    Choose wisely!!!

    A DEEPER DIVE INTO THE BUDGET TOMORROW, GOD WILLING


  8. A MUSICAL TRIBUTE FOR ALL THOSE CAUGHT UP IN A SENSELESS WAR

    #ThisIswhatHappens when you (s)ELECT BAD LEADERS!!!


  9. @hants

    They created the gridlock mess and now they pursue a path of sinking Barbados with concrete AND creating eyesores. We like it so.


  10. @Hants

    We await what the Barbados Association of Professional Engineers has to say on the matter.


  11. @TB

    The government was elected by those inclined to vote. The government will claim they have a mandate to implement their policies.


  12. @John A

    What about the taxpayers money already sunk into structures to surveil vehicles? That is the electronic tagging, those monstrous arches in Waterfords Bottom and elsewhere?


  13. @ David

    We take simple issues and try our best to complicate them. When it comes to trying to reinvent the wheel we are bosses.

    The island don’t need no ugly ass flyovers, what they need are bypass roads that will get people out of warrens going north and south. So say from the Waterford or Belle off the highway and join back the highway 2A at Cost U Less roundabout.They need to also realise with the Shop Hill top road out of service, all that traffic is now using highway 2A. Once Shop Hill to Farmers is finished, hopefully in my lifetime, that will be a major ease.

    All that we need to do is stop channelling all the traffic going north and south through warrens. On the west coast you have construction in Holetown causing major issues as well. Clean up the bottlenecks with bypass roads going both north and south, that will elimate going through warrens. Get Shop Hill to Farmers finished and alot of the problem is solved.

    Now I know my suggestion would not make those involved in precast structures happy, but didn’t this same party cuss the last party when they spoke of flyovers?


  14. We don’t need sensible solutions to this mess; we need a financial solution.

    These flyovers are a national necessity. After all, our great benefactor (the one who botched the vaccine project, you know) has to recoup his campaign donations somehow.


  15. @David March 17, 2026 at 5:59 pm “They created the gridlock mess…”

    Tell us again who said “everybody should be able to have a little car at the door”

    And as those words were spoken [channelling the car dealers?] I said to myself “if everybody has a car, at the door is exactly where it will stay, because of gridlock.” And here we are.

    But I am only a simpletom, who nobody listens to.


  16. More buses.
    More bus shelters.
    More sidewalks.
    More and better quality street lighting.
    More children going to school close to where they live.
    More work at home.
    No parking on the street. If you have a garage or driveway ALWAYS park your vehicle there.
    Better bus scheduling. Commuters from River Bay to East Point and everywhere in between should know to within 10 minutes when next a bus will pass their way.
    No giving of the most lucrative contracts to ZR and yellow bus owners owners. Such people must take a mix of lucrative and no lucrative routes.
    Fewer huge, snarling, lunging, intimidating dogs. Maybe no dogs at all.
    And to all policy makers, no accepting money or favors from the monied classes.
    No importing of private vehicles until March 18, 2028.
    Buses? Yes.
    Taxis? Yes.
    Ambulances? Yes.
    Fire trucks? Yes.
    Police vehicles? Yes.
    Vehicles for utility companies? Yes
    Commercial vehicles actually used in commence? Yes.
    All others a big fat “no.”

  17. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    “Government MP Toni Moore has called for sweeping changes to the nearly 60-year-old Barbados National Insurance and Social Security (NISS) Act, saying the current system no longer reflects the realities of modern work.
    Moore, the Barbados Workers’ Union General Secretary, recently tabled a resolution in the House of Assembly proposing a national portable benefits framework that would tie social protection to the worker rather than to a specific job title or contract.
    Moore argued that expanding participation would strengthen the National Insurance Social Security Service, “deepening compliance and closing long-standing loopholes that have nurtured a lack of accountability”.
    Moore also called for “stronger inspection, monitoring and enforcement, and proportionate penalties for non-compliance”, along with public education so that both “workers and engagers alike understand their rights, duties, and responsibilities”.

    Only in Buhbaydus? For those who are not aware MP Moore is also the longest serving Director on the NIS/NISSS Board of Directors. The Chair of that group, is to provide an Annual Report to the Minister of Labour. This hasn’t occured in nearly 20 years. And here she is calling for “penalties for non compliance”, and again using the word “accountability”.
    Please don’t piss in my pocket and tell me it’s raining.


  18. @John A

    The problem is too many vehicles on the roads.


  19. THE FIRST BUDGET OF THE NEW GOV* ON A NEW YEAR OR MERELY A SPRING STATEMENT AS WINDOW DRESSING FOR A NATION THAT WILL SOON DECIDE IF IT WAS A SLAM-DUNK OR A ‘NOTHING BURGER’ WITH JUST A LOTTA’ SIZZLE

    This is the “BIG PICTURE” where purported “STRENGTHS MASK VULNERABILITIES”, almost like a Shakespearean tragedy in the making, but let us not get ahead of ourselves…

    Let us first acknowledge what the budget is elucidating as “STRENGTHS”…

    (1) Debt reduction from 99.8% to 93.3% in [3] months is impressive
    (2) Unemployment at an historic low, a mere 6.1% is genuinely good news
    (3) A growth streak for some [19] consecutive quarters of growth is remarkable
    (4) The IMF exit that posit the country regaining policy autonomy is significant

    Lest I be accused of simply wanting to “OVERLOOK” what is good measure, to simply find “FAULTLINES” , “CRACKS” & “FISSURES”, by citing a host of “NEGATIVE” analytical positions – I chose to begin with the “GOOD NEWS” (if it can be so termed)!

    Now, let us begin

    At the quantum level of this “BUDGET”, there lies beneath structural vulnerabilities that “HAVE NOT” adequately been addressed!

    The “CRITICAL PROBLEMS” as of 18 March 2026, is the “OIL PRICE ILLUSION”, and the elephant in the room the Mottley-Crew GOV* refuses to see, (either through a propensity for short-sightedness, or just fiscal incompetence about what the future holds)!

    These are the “FACTS

    $728.5 million spent on fuel imports last year is a 50% increase from 2020’s $519 million, which means that Barbados is now more dependent, not less, and for a small nation burning so much fossil fuel cannot be “SUSTAINABLE”, in the short or long term.

    With “BRENT CRUDE” volatile movements from US$64 to US$106 in just [2] weeks, given the budget’s hedge at US$92 for 80,000 barrels/month will cover only 3 months, then after July 2026 – Barbados becomes fully exposed!

    Logic shows that the GOV* is merely absorbing only 50% of the increase – while the other 50% hits consumers and businesses immediately, where “COMMONSENSE” dictates that this is a “TAX” on the vulnerable – disguised as relief!

    A 15 cents per litre reduction is “TEMPORARY”, for when it ends, the “PRICE SHOCK” will be sudden and severe (not just for motorists but for every sector that is reliant on this fossil fuel), creating a downward loop of “PRICE HIKES” across every sector of the Barbados economy – “NOTABLY, FOOD”!

    THIS IS NOT DOOMSDAY PREDICTIONS – ITS STRAIGHT-UP LOGICAL PREDICATION

    The unspoken truth, which (I KNOW MOST FOLKS DO NOT WANT TO HEAR), is that Barbados has done nothing to reduce its fundamental oil dependence. The fuel import bill is $200 million higher than during the “COVID PLANDEMIC”, and this clearly is not resilience – it’s “ADDICTION”!

    The other “ELEPHANT” in the room is the “SHIPPING CONTAINER TIME BOMB” which has to be factored in.

    A 20ft container moves from US$200 to US$700, which is a 250% increase

    A 40ft container moves from US$400 to US$1400, which is also a 250% increase

    We all know that Barbados imports “EVERYTHING”, and these costs will cascade throughout the entire economy, affecting – “FOOD PRICES”, “CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS”, “CONSUMER GOODS”, and whatever business inputs into the economy.

    The customs cap (US$3000 for 20-foot, and US$6000 for 40-foot) is a very blunt instrument that may not reflect actual replacement costs, for big biz will either eat losses (WHICH I DOUBT), or simply pass them on to the consumers!

    The “REVERSE TAX CREDIT” is not only inadequate and though possibly “INFLATION-ERODING”, but moving from US$1300 to US$1700, is a US$400 increase where the average income threshold in Barbados currently stands at $25,000bds to $35,000bds may be helpful, but the problem with shipping costs up 250% and fuel up 65%, a $400 increase will be swallowed immediately by inflation.

    This is not a “STIMULUS” – this is “PALLIATIVE”!

    The “THORN” in my flesh is the “CHILD WEALTH FUND” which is really an “UNFUNDED LIABILITY”, and some are asking specifically, “WHAT IS WRONG WITH IT”?

    The answer is simple

    $52.1 million set aside for the current cohort, which will cover children born after November 30, 2021, but estimated ongoing cost of $10 million – $12 million/year assumes that stable birth rates and investment returns.

    There is no mention of funding sources, or must we assume that this is new revenue, or reallocated spending, and/or just another tranche of international borrowing?

    Then there is also the “INFLATION RISK”, where $5000 in 2021, (those same dollars is worth less in 2026), and the nagging question remains – will it be “INDEXED”?

    Moreover, there is the “ADMIN” cost, as to who manages these trusts, and at what fee? We also have the political risk that future governments could raid, redirect, or
    eliminate the fund – leaving the said recipients in the dock.

    The deeper problem that exist (although this may be a beautiful “PROMISE”), the mechanics are “UNCLEAR”, and it looks like a “VOTE-WINNING STRATEGY”, and not so much a fiscally sustainable program. The $52.1 million set aside sounds large, but spread across thousands of children, it may be quite inadequate.

    The “Green Industrial Gateway Advantage” (#GIGA) posits a “GRAND VISION”, but it is very “THIN ON DETAILS”!

    With the “PROMISE” that foreign earnings will increase from US$700M to US$4 Billion to possibly US$6 Billion, which is a 6X to 8X increase, with the timeframe – “within a decade”, remains “VAGUE” and with “JOB” increases “SUPPOSEDLY” in the “thousands”, the pathways remain – “UNSPECIFIED”!

    The problem with this policy is that this is a “HEADLINE” (to grab attention), it is not a “PLAN”!

    The question is:

    What industries? What incentives? What infrastructure? What skills training? What foreign investment commitments?

    Without answers, “GIGA” is just another “SLOGAN”!

    To the “CRUX” of my argument centers around – “[6] UNADDRESSED STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITIES + “BUDGET RESPONSES”

    (1) Tourism dependence – None
    (2) Food import dependence – None
    (3) Climate vulnerability – None
    (4) Aging population – None
    (5) Brain drain – None
    (6) Productivity stagnation – None

    The budget is an attempt to manage the present “GLOBAL CRISIS”, but does nothing to transform the economy – it is a survival budget, not a transformation budget!

    Based on the “TAX EXPENDITURE TRAP”, corporation tax assumptions reduced by $200 million is a massive revenue “GIVEAWAY”!

    The assumption is that it will “STIMULATE” investment and growth, but the risk is that it could become a “PERMANENT TAX CUT” for the “ALBINOS” & “INDIANS” who own the country, with no corresponding growth, creating a structural revenue hole!

    Then there is “THE MOTHER OF ALL FAULTLINES” – the “CURRENCY PEG VULNERABILITY” – where Barbados maintains its 2:1 peg to the US dollar, and if the US/IsraHELL* alliance loses out in this war, and BRICS assume ascendency, with “FUEL IMPORTS” up 50%; “SHIPPING COST” up 250%; “TOURISM REVENUES”; “FOREIGN RESERVES” finite – the unspoken risk is that the peg becomes “UNSUSTAINABLE” if reserves drain!

    Defending a “SINKING SHIP” would mean, “HIGHER INTEREST RATES”; “IMPORT COMPRESSION”; “BITING RECESSION”, and no clear answers provided, in what I describe as a “JERK-OFF BUDGET” – for as soon as you “EJACULATE” (the “HIGH” wears off) and you are back at square “ONE”!

    ALLOW ME TO CONCLUDE WITH THE FOLLOWING

    There is a “DEEPER PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEM” here that parliamentarians (PAST & PRESENT) do not see due to a lack of “OPENMINDEDNESS”!

    Remember the “CRACK” under discussion, this budget is an attempt at “CRISIS MANAGEMENT”, but have done nothing to heal the entanglement “ISSUES”.

    The Barbados GOV* assumes that global trade will resume, and that oil prices will stabilize; that shipping costs will normalize when the war ends, but most importantly, tourists will return in their record numbers!

    BUT WHAT IF THEY DON’T?

    What if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed?

    What if the “NEW NORMAL” is “PERMANENTLY HIGHER COST”?

    The budgetary “SPIN DOCTORS” may believe that their illusory artistry is a masterpiece of “HOUDINI” proportions, in navigating the “OLD WORLD’s” death throes, but it is not a “BLUEPRINT” for the world that is coming hard upon us all!

    FINAL THOUGHT

    The “BUDGETARY” verdict & what’s wrong with it on [3] levels

    Dimension Grade Reasoning

    Crisis Management B- Fuel hedge, temporary relief, quick action
    Structural Reform D No fundamental transformation
    Fiscal Sustainability C Debt falling but new liabilities created
    Social Protection C Reverse tax credit helps but inadequate
    Econ. Diversification D GIGA is a vision, not a plan
    Transparency B- Clear numbers, unclear long-term funding
    Political sustainable C Vote-winners may prove unaffordable

    The budget’s greatest weakness is not in its numbers. It is in its assumptions about the future, and if the longer conversation has shown us anything, it is that those assumptions may be the most fragile thing of all.

    Here ends today’s “REPLY” to the “BUDGET” by the “PEOPLE’s OPPOSITION MOVEMENT” who deserves better and call upon the GOV* to rescind the $200 million tax loophole for business “ELITES”, and redistribute that money to the people in order to “SPUR” spending within the economy!

    It may be a “BETRYAL” to the GOVs* money-masters, but the people are the ones who make the GOV* – not the “PREDATORY CAPITALISTS”!

    In my next piece, I will “ARGUE” vociferously against “WHY IS THE BARBADOS GOV* GIVING AWAY $200 MILLION TO CORPORATIONS”?

    #UntilThen, the “SUN” is shining and time to make some “BIOCHAR” for the garden!

    #SemperFidelis


  20. It is interesting if not unsurprising to hear the public feedback on the budget from many who should know better. The lack of focus on transformational initiatives for example. It is therefore somewhat satisfying to read the following article:

    Experts, BPSA give take on Budget

    ECONOMISTS Professor Troy Lorde and Jeremy Stephen have given a mixed but measured assessment of the 2026 Budgetary Proposals And Financial Statement.

    They have praised its strong cost-ofliving interventions but raised concerns about sustainability, implementation and the absence of a clear long-term economic transformation strategy.

    Meanwhile, the Barbados Private Sector Association (BPSA) says it supports Government’s easing the pressures faced by households and businesses, but it wants clarity on some of the policies announced on Monday by Minister of Finance Ryan Straughn in the House of Assembly.

    Both Lorde and Stephen agreed that the Budget was among the more generous in recent years, but cautioned that generosity alone might not be enough to steer Barbados through emerging global risks and structural challenges.

    Stephen described the fiscal package as a deliberate attempt to stimulate economic activity through consumption.

    “The Budget was actually one of the more generous sorts over the past few decades . . . . It is very clear that the Government is trying to use fiscal incentives to drive consumer expenditure,” he told the MIDWEEK NATION.

    He explained that this approach aligned with the structure of the Barbadian economy, which remained heavily consumption-driven. He noted that measures such as fuel caps, tax adjustments and relief initiatives were likely to boost consumer confidence in the short term.

    However, the financial analyst and economic consultant warned that this strategy might be vulnerable to external shocks, particularly geopolitical tensions affecting global energy markets.

    He questioned the feasibility of some investment-driven proposals, suggesting that implementation could prove challenging in areas such as agriculture, infrastructure and the creative industries.

    “Implementability is questionable for me, particularly where it concerns the film industry, agriculture [and] overpasses.”

    He pointed to some gaps in the Budget, including the absence of targeted reforms for the health care system and a lack of clear measures to improve the efficiency of state-owned enterprises.

    Lorde, dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill, said the Budget was politically effective but strategically incomplete, arguing that it succeeded in addressing immediate concerns but fell short of charting a clear path for economic transformation.

    “For most Barbadians, this will feel like a good Budget – and that matters – but good Budgets are not always transformative Budgets,” he stated.

    Ambition

    He stressed that Barbados was now at a critical juncture, moving beyond economic stabilisation under the Barbados Economic Recovery and Transformation programme towards a more ambitious development model under “Mission Barbados”.

    He argued that the Budget should serve as the bridge between these frameworks – balancing fiscal discipline with strategic investment – but that alignment remained limited.

    “The Budget is where discipline meets ambition, but the Budget did not reflect mission-based allocations or a clear implementation architecture,” he noted.

    Overall, Lorde gave Minister Straughn’s package a 6.5 out of ten, citing strong performance in social policy and macroeconomic credibility, but weaker outcomes in revenue realism, growth strategy and structural transformation.

    He acknowledged that Government had responded effectively to the cost-of-living crisis through measures aimed at reducing household expenses, supporting vulnerable groups and maintaining employment stability.

    However, Lorde raised concerns about the underlying growth model, arguing that it remained heavily reliant on traditional sectors such as tourism, construction and investment inflows, without clearly identifying new engines of growth.

    He further noted that while the Budget provided protection through social support, it did not sufficiently address issues of ownership, productivity and access to high-value economic opportunities.

    “This is a good Budget. It is careful. It is responsive, but it is not a transformative one,” he said.

    BPSA chairman James “Jimmy” Clarke, in a statement yesterday, said the Chamber generally supported the Budget’s “responsiveness to current economic realities and pressures faced by households and businesses”.

    “BPSA supports those measures that aim to mitigate and/ or to directly address contributory factors to rising cost of living. We were particularly pleased with the opportunity to consult with the minister as part of the 2026 Budgetary Statement preparation and have recognised several of the private sector’s recommendations in the final proposals.”

    He welcomed “the introduction of risk management measures aimed at stabilising energy costs”.

    Essential goods

    “The decision to enter into hedging arrangements to stabilise the price of heavy fuel oil for a three-month period, coupled with efforts to limit the pass-through effects of fuel price volatility on electricity bills and retail fuel prices, represents a prudent and proactive approach to shielding the domestic economy from external shocks,” he said.

    “Equally noteworthy is the adjustment to the tariff valuation methodology for essential goods, including food, personal care items and construction inputs.

    “The transition from a cost-insurancefreight basis to a freeon- board valuation is a significant policy shift that is expected to ease imported inflationary pressures and provide tangible relief to consumers and businesses alike.”

    Other budgetary measures the private sector body supported included continued support to the tourism industry, particularly through the extension of concessions under the Tourism Development Act.

    It added: “The formal recognition of rental car companies as tourism operators is a timely and practical intervention, enabling these businesses to access incentives that will facilitate fleet modernisation and help address capacity constraints during peak visitor periods.”

    However, the BPSA chairman said they want more dialogue on several “forward-looking initiatives” set out in the Budget.

    “The private sector is keen to receive additional clarity on the proposed Green Industrial Gateway Advantage, the new film incentives regime and the contemplated transfer pricing framework.

    “Further details on the scope and implementation arrangements for the national roadway improvement programme would also be beneficial, particularly given the potential implications for productivity and logistics efficiency.”

    Clarke also said that “in the context of Barbados’ evolving demographic profile, the BPSA also reiterates its long-standing recommendation for the reintroduction of incentives that encourage long-term savings and investment by Barbadians, particularly those related registered retirement savings plans”.

    Source: Nation


  21. It is also interesting to read the DLP’s statement to the budget by Corey Greenidge.

    DLP: Ease welcomed, but some concerns

    THE DEMOCRATIC LABOUR PARTY says Government’s 20262027 Budget delivers meaningful short-term relief to Barbadians, but it has concerns about fiscal sustainability and long-term economic planning.

    In a statement yesterday on behalf of the party, attorney Corey Greenidge, who ran in Christ Church South in the February 11 General Election, said they understood the difficult global environment shaping the Budget, pointing to the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine and rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East – all of which have driven up energy and shipping costs and intensified pressure on households.

    Against that backdrop, he welcomed several of the Government’s relief measures, including the expansion of the reverse tax credit, financial support for pensioners and vulnerable groups, and efforts to cushion electricity and fuel prices.

    “These measures will bring some degree of short-term relief to those most affected,” Greenidge said, noting that the intention to ease the cost of living burden was both necessary and understandable.

    However, he warned that the overall fiscal approach underpinning the Budget could have significant long-term implications.

    “The Budget raises serious questions regarding fiscal sustainability,” Greenidge said, pointing to increased Government expenditure alongside reduced revenues from tax concessions and subsidies – factors he argued could widen the fiscal deficit.

    Not clear

    He said Government had not clearly outlined how this gap would be financed, questioning whether additional borrowing would be required and under what terms, while also highlighting the absence of a defined timeline for returning public finances to balance.

    “These are critical issues . . . as an expanding deficit . . . can lead to higher public debt, increased debt servicing obligations, reduced fiscal space and greater vulnerability to future external shocks,” he added.

    He called for greater transparency regarding Barbados’ debt position, noting that while there was reference to discussions with international financial institutions such as the Inter-American Development Bank and Caribbean Development Bank, details remained limited.

    Beyond fiscal concerns, he pointed to “structural gaps” in key policy areas, particularly crime, food security and energy.

    On crime, the attorney submitted that while the establishment of two gun courts might assist the judicial process, it did not amount to a comprehensive strategy to address the root causes of violence, including the illegal importation of firearms and narcotics.

    “Without strengthening border security . . . and improving intelligence . . . the effectiveness of judicial reforms alone will be limited.”

    Turning to agriculture, Greenidge said the Budget fell short of presenting a robust national food security plan, describing the measures as incremental and insufficient to significantly reduce Barbados’ reliance on food imports.

    National priority

    “Food security must be treated as a matter of national priority and national security,” he stressed, while calling for coordinated, large-scale action.

    He also highlighted continued vulnerability in the energy sector, noting that while shortterm relief measures were welcomed, there remained no clearly defined pathway to energy independence through renewable energy expansion.

    Greenidge questioned the viability of the proposed Green Industrialisation Gateway Advantage, describing it as an ambitious concept but one lacking critical details such as financing, timelines, investor commitments and workforce readiness.

    “Barbadians are entitled to understand how this vision will translate into tangible economic opportunities,” he said.

    In summary, he said the Budget reflected a Government responding to immediate pressures but not yet outlining a clear road map for longterm transformation.

    “This Budget . . . succeeds in providing relief in the present, but Barbados must now move toward a clear, credible and sustainable strategy for long-term economic resilience and growth,” he said.

    He added that the DLP remains committed to supporting policies that ease the burden on citizens while continuing to advocate for fiscal discipline, structural reform and strategic planning to secure the country’s future. (CLM)

    Source: Nation

  22. Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV Avatar
    Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV

    David
    March 17, 2026 at 5:59 pm
    “@hants
    They created the gridlock mess and now they pursue a path of sinking Barbados with concrete AND creating eyesores. We like it so.”

    Tron
    March 17, 2026 at 9:16 pm
    “These flyovers are a national necessity. After all, our great benefactor (the one who botched the vaccine project, you know) has to recoup his campaign donations somehow.”

    I think it was folly to “politicize” the flyover issue. The matter should be framed as “what are the valid solutions to rectify the traffic issues and if flyovers are a legitimate solution for Barbados”. I supported the flyovers back in 2008 and i still support it now. IN MY OPINION our traffic issues are a direct result of Barbados being densely populated. We are in the top 20 countries in terms of population density. It is denser along the west and south coast including “Greater” Bridgetown. Considering this it is not far fetched for Barbados even as a small island to have traffic woes.
    Nearly 40 years after the ABC was first constructed we have a situation that the highway is at capacity and needs to be expanded. I my view there are limited avenues to expand the current highway throughout the entire length.

    My reasoning supporting the flyovers is from simple observation. Most traffic jams originate from road interactions, whether it be at traffic lights or roundabouts. Major road arteries transecting one another will have traffic backed up. Flyovers are a 3D solution to a 2D problem. Remove the intersection and theoretically there would be less traffic congestion. The only practical way to remove the intersection is to raise one of the roads over the other. I stand to be corrected but original concept was to construct overpasses oriented North – South over the roundabouts along the ABC Highway from Redman’s village \ Welches to the Garfield Sobers Roundabout.
    In MY OPINION flyovers along with public transport reform must be included as solutions to ease Barbados’ traffic woes


  23. @Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV March 18, 2026 at 8:20 am

    Of course, I’m all for the flyovers too. To be honest, I can’t wait for them to be built.

    Nevertheless, our great government should be careful about where the cement and prefabricated components come from. Some local suppliers provide absolutely substandard quality. The same applies to the road surfacing, by the way. On some newly resurfaced roads, the surface is already cracking open again after just six months.

    Tron
    fair and balanced


  24. After running headlong into the disastrous iceberg, all the brass bowl clowns on BB Titanic suddenly know how to steer…

    SBSH.. (shaking Bushie’s stinking head…)

    Wunna would do better to find out how to swim, dive, and to hold wunna breath under cold water …for a couple months…


  25. “The problem is too many vehicles on the roads.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Yuh think!!!

    So then – for ten marks, explain a national policy to give huge incentives for the importation of electric and hybrid vehicles, 99% of which will use the SAME fossil fuel as the old vehicles – EXCEPT that the electric company will now burn the fuel rather than the individual vehicles…

    Explain what happens to the old vehicles that were previously owned by the new EV enthusiasts…
    – Are they properly disposed of in our modern solid waste system?
    – Are they refurbished and exported to other jurisdictions?
    – Is there a national plan that identifies the optimum and maximum vehicle carrying capacity for this finite place?
    – Who manages the macro plan? Where is it? …When was it last reviewed?

    …Or are we simply ADDING to the already overloaded, unplanned, chaotic situation – like a pack of sheep led by clowns?

    What a place…!
    Where ignorance is bliss…
    BBs are at risk.


  26. The congestion issue here is specific to certain areas that we all know if you think about it. Once these areas are cleared then traffic flows quite freely. Everyone wants to use the ABC highway, but if you think on it they are other roads that can be used that would spread the traffic load. Going airport from west coast for example, one could go through st George up Boarding Hall pass Coral Ridge and Slumberest, then join the highway below Coverly. Other destinations same story.

    The problem is these alternative roads need widening and repairing. We need to look at our existing roads that feed out of congested areas and see what we can do to make bypass options available. That would reduce the cost of steal involved in flyovers as well.


  27. The price of a barrel of oil is currently 150USD in parts of Asia as a result of the expections of a massive war escalation in West Asia.

    Commentators are suggesting that 20OUSD per barrel could hits by tomorrow.

    Why?

    The terrorist, criminal United States and the genocidal regime in Palestine had earlier bombed a strategic Iranian gas field, South Pars, which is currently ablaze. And could remain so for months.

    The IRGC, the Iranian elite forces, have just issued a statement with the list of installations which are to be targeted almost immediately.

    Those installations are in Saudia Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and the UAE.

    These are the circumstances we’ve been trying to warn people here about for years.

    The import of this retaliatory action, in addition to limitless increases in oil and gas prices, will also mean that these installations shall be offline for up to ten years, that the global economy will be like 1929 again, that the life taken for granted shall cease to exit.

    For example, who will be able to buy petrol at 10 or 15USD per gallon?

    Who would be able to cook, unless by firewood?

    Alarming! Yes!


  28. https://www.youtube.com/live/sfLSv788vJ8?si=ShUFTwTp6kBm6Fuq

    https://www.youtube.com/live/nWKCj_BZTO8?si=IzmoSOIdTyH4MyOb

    Armageddon cometh!

    This means that if this budgetary process had any meaning. Well, it does not now!


  29. @ Pacha

    Oil at 2.41pm today was trading on the NYMEX a $96.18 USD a barrel.


  30. John A

    Well, that quote is easily available. So is that in East Asia markets.

    The only difference between yours and mine is duration.

    For the East Asian markets are at a different time in the daily cycle than the NYMEX.

    The East Asian financial markets best tell what Western markets are more likely to reflect tomorrow.

    Should your argument hold true by the time Western markets open tomorrow Pacha shall appropriately bow to your point. But that is impossible!

    However, it’s always best to see these things before the herd arrives. Especially, if you’re a trader. Weee rest on years of experience in these matters. And would bet that that price you now quote shall be at least 150USD per barrel by NYMEX opens tomorrow, Thursday.


  31. John A

    What’s most important is not the NYMEX price in and of itself. It’s seeing what NYMEX did not see. That’s where the real money is, for arbitrage at least.

    This is easy to do. Look at the public reports. Know the military strategies of combatants. The announcements as to what will happen. The confirmation that Iranian gas field have been hit and are currently burning. Indeed, retaliations have already started.

    We suggest an ironclad case!


  32. @DL&PTV

    There is backup in traffic on many roads not including the ABC where the flyovers are being proposed? We have a root problem, too many vehicles on our roads; too many headed in the same direction and location at the same time.


  33. In addition @DL&PTV

    The blogmaster recalls the issue well where a two man company was established to oversee the project. Some of you are very naive:


  34. @Bush Tea

    The answer is simple, increasing EV penetration fits a narrative the government;PM Mottley gains favour when she plies the international circuit at the various fora that adds to her growing reputation.


  35. @John A

    Using circuitous routes to connect to the ABC will work only in some cases.


  36. @John A

    Didn’t Finance Minister assure the nation that three months supple of oil was future purchased at USD106 price? Hopefully Trump will get tired of the stock exchange losing points.


  37. @ Pacha

    I really hope your wrong this time Pacha. A move from $96 a barrel today to opening at $150 a barrel tomorrow morning, will devestate the markets in tomorrow’s trading. Thing is in the short term we can only guess at where the price will go as we know the market fears uncertainty.


  38. @ David

    Yes we have a little bumper in there for the next few weeks. Thing is the increase in freight charges and other imports with a petroleum input, we will have no choice but to start dealing with before then no doubt.


  39. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE 2026 BUDGET

    The Budget’s main value was in honouring the key promises focusing on easing the persistently high cost of living, made by the Barbados Labour Party in the recently-concluded election. However, the short-term nature of some of the measures should not be overlooked.

    Conversely, the Budget has low value from a structural perspective. First, there was no clear link between the Budget and the 2026-2027 Estimates, Barbados Economic Recovery and Transformation (BERT 3.0) programme, and the Economic Diversification and Growth Fund Bill, 2025. The occasional mention of a link or hint of a link is woefully inadequate.

    I note with interest the revisions to the 2026-2027 Estimates. Specifically, the lowering of the projected corporate income tax by $200 million and the reduction of Government expenditure by $300 million.

    The adjustments follow concerns expressed by me in a recently published article about the realism of the revenue estimate and the impact of the escalation in expenditure on borrowing, given the country’s continued high debt situation. For clarity, the programmes and projects to be impacted by the $300 million reduction in expenditure should have been identified in the Budget presentation.

    Second, an important structural weakness of the Budget was the glaring absence of a discussion on the impact of the measures on key macroeconomic variables, notably employment, growth, debt, prices, balance of payments, and fiscal deficit.

    Third, the Budget failed to address some of the most significant social and economic weaknesses in the country. These include unbalanced sectoral growth with the economy over-reliant on the tourism sector and to a lesser extent, construction in more recent times. There were no details on advancing urgently required economic transformation and diversification beyond the limited information on the Green Industrialization Gateway Advantage.

    The mention of target annual export earnings increasing from US$700 million to US$4 billion and to US$6 billion within a decade in the absence of a well articulated industrialization policy to resuscitate manufacturing and increase export opportunities is fanciful thinking of the highest order.

    Such a lofty and over-ambitious target is reminiscent of Minister Straughn’s announcement in May 2025 that the Government has set a target of increasing rum export earnings from approximately US$50 million to US$1 billion annually, an increase of 1900 per cent. While Mr. Straughn was making the unrealistic projection, the Central Bank was reporting that rum exports had declined by 38.6 per cent compared to 2023 levels and were on course to reach the lowest level since 2010.

    The treatment of the agricultural sector is minimalist since the measures are focused more on small-scale agricultural projects. The absence of a discussion on the future of the dying sugar industry was glaring.

    Similarly, the treatment of the manufacturing, renewable energy, and international business sectors was disappointing.

    Other structural weaknesses in the economy not addressed in the Budget are low productivity, and the labour market characterized by a high level of youth unemployment, high underemployment, and low participation rates, especially among females.

    Further, the Budget did not include measures to (i) boost private sector investment to levels required to achieve the desired five per cent growth in the economy on a sustained basis, (ii) address the high taxes which have a constraining social and economic impact, (iii) moderate the insatiable appetite for borrowing, and (iv) advance the reformation of the inefficient state-owned enterprises which continue to be financially burdensome on public funds.

    Despite the measures aimed at bringing some measure of relief to the high cost living, other challenges at the social level were not addressed. These include the worrying levels of dispossession and poverty, skewness in the distribution of income, and unacceptably high levels of violent and other crimes.

    The proposed establishment of two gun courts will help to speed up gun-related matters before the courts. However, targeted social, educational, employment and other programmes are required to steer the youth away from participation in gang activity and involvement in gun-related and other crimes.

    Anthony P. Wood is an Economist, and former Lecturer in Economics, Banking and Finance at the Cave Hill Campus of the University of the West Indies


  40. Crop started.


  41. @ Pacha
    Bushie wonders if even you grasp what is ahead for us…
    No one else even comes close.

    @ David
    BU has fought a good fight, and you have run the full course.
    Anyone in BBland, or in the BB diaspora, who now seeks to claim ignorance of our dilemma have only themselves to blame. Barbados Underground has played a STELLAR role in EDUCATING those who wanted to be taught, in enlightening those who were in the dark, an even entertaining those of us who needed to type shiite, …LOL even the Petra Wicky types attended to jump on BU’s back – but as you know, Bushie can’t stomach dat kinda brassbowlery…

    Going forward, there is no doubt that, as it was in the days of Noah, BBs will continue feting, eating, and drinking and making merry, …right until the big fan is impacted with jobby…
    …However, you may as well cool it with your dreams of a turn-around, and for common sense to prevail.
    That point has been passed… and the second Trump has sounded… so expect all Hell to break loose – starting with a ‘great mountain burning with fire…’ soon…

    What a time to be alive…!


  42. @Bush Tea

    There is an inevitability to it all.


  43. Bushie

    Well, I like to try to moderate the gravamen of reality.

    People here prefer endless dialogue about meaningless trite.

    Thus the outward inclination to deal with such matters on the margins so as not to shiiite in the people’s punch bowl, like a tenant!


  44. Where is the voice of Ryan Walters?

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading