Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Kemar J.D Stuart

On the Nation Sunday Sun March 9th,  it highlights that the Minister in the Ministry of Finance Ryan Straughn and the marketing point is that this year’s 2025 budget will not introduce new taxes. This needs an Alternate View. 

The high cost of living benefited government coffers significantly. To explain,  high prices = higher the tax collected.

The inflation dividend was a key plank of the government’s high level of tax collection because taxation was charged as a percentage of price of a good or service.

The real pain will be felt on the expenditure cutting side as on the revenue side the current administration collected the highest levels of tax revenue ever in the financial and economic history of Barbados lodged between years of 2018-2025. This is supported by record levels of foreign borrowing 

The IMF regards Barbados’ tax levels as high and therefore reforms suggested by BERT 2 focuses on expenditure reduction which is in direct contradiction of the record level expenditure presented in the estimates

While this is Barbados’ 2nd year of a ‘no taxes’ budget. Jamaica’s Prime Minister Andrew Holness announced its 9th  consecutive year of “no new taxes”. Jamaica made this possible by constantly meeting a primary surplus target of 7.5% of their GDP. A primary surplus is government earnings minus government’s spend

In the 2017-2018 budget at least BBD$300 million in taxes were implemented which allowed the Stuart administration to record a primary surplus of 3% of $10 Billion BDS in GDP. 

In 2018, under the BERT and the delivery of the mini budget, the Barbados economy was restructured by the Mottley administration to increase the primary surplus target from 3% or $300 Million to 6% or $600 Million which saw the imposition of taxes and expenditure cuts on Barbadians. This 6% target was met in 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 totalling a $1.2 Billion adjustment 

Some of the following taxes were implemented

  • Fuel tax
  • 40% income tax bands
  • Increase of 30% in corporation tax 
  • VAT online (Amazon)
  • Health service contribution
  • Departure tax 
  • Room rate levy 
  • Garbage and sewage tax 
  • Land tax increases 

For FY 2020-2021 & 2021-2022  the GOB reduced its primary surplus target to -1% to accommodate COVID, however, no taxes were removed or lowered. The high inflation environnent allowed government to have higher financial reward.

Fitch rating agency reported in October 2024 indicating that the Barbados economy had little to no elbow room should any major disruptions occur. Despite Barbados achieving the primary surplus target agreed under the IMF BERT plan, Fitch reported that the distribution of taxes collected by the government of Barbados was led by a 12.7% increase in Personal Income taxes collected, a 7.1% increase in VAT collected and a 6.4% increase in import duties collected.

The brunt of government’s expenditure cuts were led by a massive 22% cut in overall capital expenditure while the recurrent cost of running the government still remains high and took only a 0.2% decrease in expenditure. Fitch expects that the government of Barbados will maintain this level of expenditure discipline as FY2024  and into 2025.

Based on Fitch’s projections it is fair to assume that as the agreed reforms in BERT & IMF RST progress,  deep cuts to recurrent expenditure may follow. The major recurrent expenses for Barbados are wages & salaries, transfers to State owned Enterprises and provisions of goods and services. For example the shut down of CBC. 

However Fitch indicated that further reforms will be more challenging due to more complicated issues and potential reduced buy-in from stakeholders as other concerns take priority.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

59 responses to “Minister Ryan Straughn to deliver budget”


  1. This seems like a DLP piece. And if conveniently represents the views of the DLP it should so stated.

    Anything less than that might persuade those less alert that the writer is some kind of an independent voice.

    No wonder we’ve long had a political-economy, for there no separation between them.

    Let him tell RAT that regardless of this feeble attempt by Mottley to put up a less worthy deliverer of the budget, as a tactic to locate RAT, as opposition leader, more than a few levels below that of herself, that RAT should ignore Straughn, the puppet, and direct his full firepower towards the puppeteer, as though it was she actually giving the budget.


  2. A few weeks ago Mottley had Von der Leyen as the EU representative in Barbados talking about regional integration.

    In Romania today, Calin Georgescu, the would be president, and having been separated from an over 50 percentile victory a number of weeks ago, is now again being disqualified from the rerun of that election.

    The first time around he defeated seven competitors with more than half the electorate voting for him. Now a supreme court must decide whether his candidature was illegally removed from the ballots.

    Don’t get us wrong, for Georgescu is a hard rightist, much like Drumpf. However, he’s been adamant that the Ukraine war, NATO’s wider war aims and America’s nuclear weapons plans are not in Romania’s national interests. These are positions the “democrats” in Brussels find unaceptable.

    As a result Georgescu is the enemy of the elected bureaucrats in Brussels. Making him, a popularly elected president, bared in the first instance, and now ultra viresly disqualified by the unelected officials in Brussels.

    Democracy? No, no, no!

    None of these things will make any different to those who will be talking shiiite from Tuesday on.


  3. Unelected bureaucrats in Brussels


  4. “Canada’s PM Justin Trudeau delivers a farewell speech, as his successor is to be announced in Liberal leadership race results – Source: BBC


  5. Canada is in as much trouble as Barbados, exception for the invasion which looms large!

    Of the two possible successors to Trudeau. One, Freeland is an hardline Ukrainian nationalist and a neoliberal warmonger.

    However, Mark Carney is more likely to win but, like most politicos in the West, is an arch Zionist.

    But Trudeau has, through a level of fecklessness which would have made his father turn in his grave, has done more damage to Canada that a hurricane.


  6. Than a hurricane


  7. Oh oh!!


  8. All eyes on Budget speech/strong>

    Despite growth, proposals being delivered in a climate of global uncertainty

    by SHAWN CUMBERBATCH shawncumberbatch@nationnews.com

    WHEN MINISTER IN THE Ministry of Finance Ryan Straughn delivers the Budget Speech today in the House of Assembly, he will be doing so against the backdrop of a growing economy and Government’s improved fiscal performance.

    However, the minister, who is an economist, will also be speaking as a cloud of uncertainty linked to United States policies and other global risks hovers over the island’s economic prospects this year.

    Straughn has already signalled that there will be no taxes in the Budget, but Barbadians will be listening to find out if any new fees or charges will be imposed in the proposals and the extent to which Government will give consumers an ease.

    As outlined by Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Mia Amor Mottley, the last Budget, which was presented on March 18, 2024, was “a conversation with Barbadians about where we have come from, where we are now and where we go next and, of course, how we get there”.

    Move forward

    “It is a Budget that would secure our Barbados of today and our Barbados for tomorrow,” Mottley said.

    “It is time now for to us deliver and for us to move forward to achieve equitable, inclusive and stronger growth that would leave no one behind and that would lift everybody up.”

    Recent Budgets have focused on economic growth, increased investment, debt, reform of state-owned enterprises, the cost of living, some tax reform policies and energy.

    Today’s Budget could cover all of these issues and more as Government continues economic reform to make the economy more resilient in the face of international challenges and continued threat from climate change.

    Government will also have to factor into its Budget the new wages and salaries agreement to be negotiated with representatives of public sector workers, as the current deal expires this year.

    Central to this has been the Barbados Economic Recovery and Transformation programme, which the Prime Minister recently said was entering its third iteration.

    This comes as Barbados approaches the end of its second consecutive arrangement with the International Monetary Fund.

    Policies outlined by Straughn will also be anchored on Government’s budget for the 2025-2026 fiscal year, which starts on April 1.

    The projection is for $5.13 billion in expenditure and $3.98 billion in revenue, leaving a more than $1 billion deficit which will be funded by domestic ($678.5 million) and foreign borrowing ($518.4 million).

    With higher debt repayments plus interest predicted to account for $1.76 billion of expenditure in 2025-2026, the Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs and Investment expects to benefit from a primary surplus of $613.6 million.

    Straughn outlined the economic challenges facing Barbados, and the improved economic performance, on November 24 last year when delivering a ministerial statement on Government’s mid-year budget review for the 2024-2025 fiscal year.

    He said the report was presented at a time when “the global economic environment continues to face several challenges”.

    Resilient

    “The lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical tensions and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict have resulted in economic uncertainty and price volatility,” the minister noted.

    “Despite these challenges, Barbados has remained resilient, continuing its recovery with strong performance in tourism and construction sectors. These sectors have driven economic growth and created employment opportunities for Barbadians.”

    He said that Government “remains committed to maintaining fiscal discipline while supporting economic growth and development”.

    Straughn said the half-year performance left Government confident “that we are on track to meet our targets, and the Government will continue to work tirelessly to ensure that these targets are met”.

    The economy’s strong position was confirmed in January when the Central Bank released its review of 2024.

    Governor Dr Kevin Greenidge reported “robust economic growth in 2024, marking three consecutive years of expansion and surpassing the estimated global growth rate”.

    “Real [gross domestic product] increased by four per cent, driven by strong performances in business services, tourism, construction, and retail trade sectors,” he said.

    Government’s fiscal position also improved in the first three quarters of fiscal year 2024-2025, including an overall surplus of $224.8 million, compared to a deficit of $7.7 million in the previous period.

    The Central Bank’s outlook is for the economy to grow by three per cent this year, which “hinges on continued investments by both the public and private sectors, as well as ongoing improvements in productivity and competitiveness”.

    Source: Nation


  9. Small states and global realignment

    IN THE GRAND chessboard of global power, small developing islands and states often find themselves as pawns – caught in the shifting tides of geopolitical rivalries, economic upheavals and the waning influence of traditional superpowers.

    As the United States retreats from its once-dominant role as a beacon of soft power, choosing instead to flex its economic and military muscle to maintain global unipolarity, small nations are left to navigate an increasingly uncertain and multipolar world.

    The very foundations on which they have relied – trade partnerships, financial aid, diplomatic alliances – are shifting, forcing them to adapt, negotiate and sometimes compromise in ways previously unimagined.

    For decades, the US used soft power to influence small states, particularly in the Caribbean and the Pacific. Its cultural exports – Hollywood, Ivy League scholarships, development aid and diplomatic partnerships – gave these nations a sense of belonging in the Western-led global order. But that influence has waned. Small nations that once looked to Washington for leadership now exist in a world where the US is more focused on containing China than investing in the stability and prosperity of its traditional allies. Trade deals are no longer as favourable, diplomatic visits are infrequent and the promise of economic upliftment has been replaced by strategic neglect.

    Different approach

    Yet, as the US steps back from soft power engagement, China has stepped forward with an entirely different approach. Instead of selling democracy and human rights, China offers roads, ports, hospitals and loans – tangible investments that small states desperately need. From the Caribbean to the Indian Ocean to the Pacific, Chinese investment has become an undeniable force. Small island states, struggling with climate change, debt and economic stagnation, find themselves accepting these deals, sometimes with unease, knowing that aligning too closely with Beijing could put them at odds with Washington.

    This delicate balancing act is treacherous, as the US intensifies its efforts to maintain unipolarity, exerting economic and diplomatic pressure on countries that choose to deepen ties with China.

    Economic struggles

    Compounding these challenges is the growing wealth and income inequality within the US itself. The economic struggles of the American middle class have had unintended consequences for small states dependent on US tourism, remittances and trade. When Americans struggle financially, they travel less. They send less money back home. They buy fewer imports from developing nations. This ripple effect is devastating for small island economies, which rely heavily on service industries and external cash flows.

    Meanwhile, global economic realignment is redrawing the financial and trade networks that small states have depended on for decades. The post-World War II economic order, dominated by institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, is being challenged by alternative financial systems led by China, the BRICS alliance and regional development banks. For small states, this means both opportunity and risk. On the one hand, they have new financial partners willing to offer loans and investments without the stringent conditionalities imposed by Western institutions. On the other hand, they risk falling into unsustainable debt traps, forced to navigate between competing financial and political interests.

    Beyond economics, the decline of US soft power has cultural and ideological implications for small states. For decades, the US positioned itself as a model of democracy, human rights and prosperity. But as political instability, racial tensions and income inequality deepen within the US, that image has become harder to sell. Small states that once aspired to the American way have begun to question whether the Western model of governance is the only path forward, while others seek alternative alignments that better suit their interests.

    Looming crisis

    Amid all these shifts, small island developing states face another silent but looming crisis – climate change. While great powers engage in economic and military posturing, these states battle rising seas, extreme weather and the very real threat of losing land to climate-driven disasters. They need investment in climate resilience, sustainable development and infrastructure, yet global economic shifts have made funding less accessible. The US, once a champion of international development aid, is preoccupied with maintenance of its hegemony.

    For small nations, the shifting dynamics of global power are not abstract theoretical debates – they are matters of survival. They will have to be nimble, balance allegiances and extract as much as they can from a world where no superpower is truly invested in their long-term prosperity.

    The future will be one of constant negotiation, strategic partnerships and an unrelenting fight for sovereignty and stability in an unpredictable global order.

    Professor Troy Lorde is an economist and Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus. Email troy. lorde@cavehill.uwi.edu

    Source: Nation


  10. These university types are geniuses in copying acceptable tired memes, mouthing the bullShite of the local political elites, the hands which feed them.

    Lorde is hard to read because he just restates the restated. At least he talks about a grand chessboard but weee gleam that he has no idea about what he speaks.

    He writes at a time when foreign minister Symmonds has spoken about a letter received from Rubio threatening leaders of governments in the region that should they not sever their relationships with Cuba that they America visas shall be cancelled.

    We are talking about Mottley who was the darling of empire’s wokeism and along with others were the instruments of American interventionism in Guyana, twice, the hybrid war on Haiti and generally acted as supplicants to every hideous desire of the White people.

    Lorde writes when the discourses for a new world order are well advanced. When there is a likelihood that Drumpf will unearth the Monroe Doctrine. When, the long held dream of the British for the world to be divided up into three (3) distinct spheres of influence as first mouthed by Mckinder has raised its ugly head, again.

    In the last set of circumstances, Lorde would have nothing to worry about because the region would remain the backyard of America.

    These are the orders of magnitude facing us. These are the dynamics of the new grand chessboard about which Brizenski wrote and which Putin and Drumpf are now discussing.

    Within this schema Barbados and the Caribbean will be superfluous. However, if Barbados and the region had shown a less inclination to wipe the ass of America and had given primacy to emerging groups like BRICS and maybe the old Non-Aligned Movement and stop pretending that punching above one’s weight was possible in a world of international relationships guided by both aggressive realism and defensive realism the fierce lion now knocking at the door could have been tamed.


  11. @ David

    Yes there will be great talk and excuses for everything and the politicians will pompeset about fixing roads and how great the winter season was etc. But let.me in one line summarise our reality.

    IN THE YEAR WITH THE HIGHEST INCOME FROM TAXES EVER COLLECTED AND RECORD ARRIVALS WE ARE STILL GOING TO RUN A 1 BILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT.

    if you check back on BU Hansard I said about a year ago we were going to end up with a billion dollar defict if we continued on this path. The faithfuls at the time accused me of being negative. Well we have arrived even with record levels.of income the said deficit.

    Where do we go from here now more taxes less expenditure or the sale of more family silver?


  12. MacKinder as in Halford MacKinder.


  13. @ Pacha
    Translation:
    Our ass is grass
    and we cannot expect sound guidance from our leaders
    OR from our academics.

    HOWEVER…
    If wunna ask Bushie…
    He is disposed to ask the step-father a question fuh wunna…
    LOL


  14. @ John A
    “BU Hansard…!!!”
    ANOTHER CLASSIC…

    You DONE know that Bushie will be plagiarizing DAT!!
    LOL


  15. @ Bush Tea

    Use as you see fit. LOL


  16. @John A and Bush Tea

    A gentle reminder that BU, as the publisher, holds the copyright to all original content posted in this space, unless otherwise stated. LOL


  17. Imagine you have the only superpower bullying a small region which currently holds 31 billion dollars in foreign currency in US banks as part of their foreign reserves.


  18. LOL at the Blogmaster….
    Feel free to sue the bushman’s burro…

    De whacker done get tek way already..
    (refer to the BU Hansard – circa 2010)
    So there is nothing left to be confiscated…

    …and John A already got more dollars than he can get spent..
    So Bushie will be plagiarizing at will..
    LOL
    ha ha


  19. “Imagine you have the only superpower bullying a small region …”

    …and imagine a scenario where the bully comes to realize that the ‘victims’ he initially had in mind (Canada, Mexico and the EU) were EVEN BIGGER BULLIES that HE is….
    Who do you think will end up taking the licks…?

    Borrowing heavily from the IMF (the financial frontline of the US army) the IDB (their secret intelligence/ financial agency) and commiting to the various agreements of the UN (in exchange for cheap bribes of ‘grants’ and ‘soft loans’) WAS ALWAYS a modern re-enactment of the Trojan horse tale.

    The enemy is now WITHIN…. Which is why Government HAS to sell them the land, businesses and whatever else they want. It is why Holetown is a ‘done deal..’

    Our ONLY hope now is to send forward BU’s John and GP as our representatives – and hope that their genuflections and near worship of the Trumpster will work in our favor…

    BUT WAIT DOH!!!
    Bushie hopes that GP is not currently in some holding cell – in chains, waiting to be deported by his idol…. He has been VERY quiet in recent times yuh!!…

    What a place and time!!


  20. It should be clear to the political directorate that Barbadians have grown intolerant of the status quo. If politicians are not careful, given the rising lawlessness, apathy, and cynicism, something unwelcome may emerge


  21. David you missing the point they dont care as there is no opposition. The Holetown issue has shown all of us what the future holds. Our desires are irrelevant basically and around elections they will come for the X then. Voting also will be an irrelevant issue as even if they lose a few seats, they will be back in power where LEADERSHIP BY ELECTED DICTATORSHIP will continue.

    My friend if you have not seen that yet I dont know when you will. Even if we protest by not voting they will be enough doing so to put them back in, as Barbados does not require a minimum voting total or percentage of the electorate to declare an elections.


  22. @John A

    When there was an opposition weren’t these kinds of issues occurring?


  23. @ David

    Yes they were and I am sure you remember how the electorate punished the guilty ones with the vote. One swing from memory was 28 to 3 and so it went. Problem this time there is no opposition in the public’s eyes, so another BLP victory is guaranteed. Remember when the people had enough of Arthur what happened? That can not happen again as their is no second party to turn to. As a result we will have little choice but to take we poison and complain about it on the blogs and to friends when we see them.

    I guess we should look at the bright side and say thank God its Mia and not Stuart though! LOL


  24. “Imagine you have the only superpower bullying a small region …”

    Trumps ignorant racism is America’s ignorant racism

    An interesting article about Selma 60 years ago and the Civil Rights fight today

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/10/bloody-sunday-selma-alabama-civil-rights

  25. Terence Blackett Avatar
    Terence Blackett

    A PROMISE IS A MINDLESS COMFORT FOR A FOOL GIVEN THAT EVEN THE SO-CALLED EDUCATED MASSES GET HOODWINKED BY ANISOTROPIC GYRATIONS MASKED AS PLEDGES, PROMISES & , PECCANT PRETENSE

    George “DUBYAH” Bush, during his 1988 presidential campaign, famously used the phrase “READ MY LIPS: NO NEW TAXES”, which later became a significant political issue when he broke his promise & agreed to a “TAX INCREASE” as part of a “BUDGET DEAL” with Congress!!!

    On a morning run, weeks later – when asked by a journo, why he reneged on his promise – he said: “READ MY HIPS”; a sly, sinistral, tortious, venal swipe – meaning: “KISS MY ARSE”, in deductive parlance!!!

    Bush had been forced to raise taxes, 2 years later – in 1990, as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, which led to criticism from both sides of the aisle & is often cited as a major factor in his loss during the 1992 election!!!

    COMEUPPANCE

    Since UK LABOUR* took power by similar, lying, deceptive fourberie, the phrase has been used by other politicians to emphasize their commitment to not “INCREASING TAXES” on the working class “MASSES”, as will be seen in the context of the upcoming Budget in the (DIS) #UnitedKingdom of #Amnesia & #Paranoia, where Bridget Phillipson has stated that people will not see higher taxes on their payslips!!!

    WHAT A CROQ!!!

    #ContextMatters

    If this young man, #RyanStraughn who clearly have NOT* written the #BudgetSpeech & is nothing more than a “BOOTLICKING, SERVILE DUNCE” in a “KANGAROO KOOK OF KNUCKLEHEADS” – what can you expect than more of the same ‘ole, same ‘ole – “WHERE THE PEOPLE EXPECT A DIFFERENT RESULT”!!!

    When any GOV* pledges “NO NEW TAXES,” expect potential trade-offs, hidden consequences, & missed opportunities!!!

    ALTERNATIVE VIEWPOINT:

    1. Fiscal Sustainability Concerns

    Debt & #FutureBurden, in the light of “SUPPOSEDLY” avoiding new taxes “WILL” require increased borrowing, shifting costs to future generations through higher public debt, which will lead to #Austerity2.0 measures, reduced public services, and/or eventual tax hikes during so-called unforeseen crises. The knock-on-effect of underfunded priorities will see critical areas like healthcare, education, & infrastructure suffer from chronic underinvestment, harming long-term economic resilience & social equity

    2. Equity & Fairness

    #Brassbados is burdened by a regressive #StatusQuoMentality within its existing tax system – 99% of the time, favoring the “UBER-RICH” & wealthier individuals, predatory corporations & “OTHER CHARLATANS” – who through the use of deceptive loopholes can lower rates on capital gains (EVEN ON ILL-GOTTEN GAINZ*). The refusal to reform taxes exacerbates inequality – as the “RICH KEEP GETTING RICHER” & the “POOR BASTERDS” keep getting fleeced by the “WOLVES IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING”

    3. Hidden or Indirect Taxes

    THIS IS THE #BASTERD OF ALL #BASTERDS!!!

    Stealth austerity by the backdoor, where GOVs* cut tax credits (e.g., child benefits), while raising fees (e.g., tuition, permits), or reduce public services – effectively imposing indirect burdens on lower-2-middle-income earners & groups. At the same time, wealth & corporate taxation hides in the dark – where critics argue for more progressive reforms (e.g., wealth taxes, closing offshore loopholes) to ensure the “UBER-RICH” pay a fair share, rather than relying on regressive consumption taxes. Then you have “INFLATION AS A TAX” – where monetary policy committees (BoE, FED) tolerate higher inflation – eroding purchasing power, while acting as an implicit tax on savings & wages

    4. Political Short-Termism

    As we now see in the UK, US, China, Russia & elsewhere, #PopulismOverPrudence is the “DRIVER” of last resorts – “PROMISING NO NEW TAXES” as a hook that prioritizes electoral appeal over responsible governance, deferring tough choices (e.g., climate action, pension reforms) & risking systemic crises. With this kind of erosion of trust -austerity & debt spirals follow, public trust in institutions weaken, fueling polarization & social unrest (AS WILL BE SEEN THIS SUMMER IN BRITAIN)

    5. Economic Context Matters

    The issue comes down to “GROWTH” v “STAGNATION” – as tax cuts can stimulate growth during recessions, refusing to tax windfall corporate profits during booms (e.g., post-pandemic or energy crises) may squander revenue needed for the public purse

    6. Alternatives to New Taxes

    As a small nation state, the #Brassbados GOV* is incapable of closing “TAX” loopholes or improving tax enforcement & eliminating evasion from large monolithic institutions as they would simply go elsewhere. This is however one way they could raise revenue without new rates. For example, multinational corporations often exploit gaps to avoid taxation

    7. Global Comparisons

    Where progressive models exist, countries like Norway (resource wealth taxes) or Denmark (high VAT with robust social services) show alternatives that balance equity & growth – profiting everyone in the long term

    The austerity pitfalls of post-2008 “CRASH” in Southern Europe led to prolonged recessions & social unrest, underscoring risks of underfunding public systems & services. The alternative view argues that “NO NEW TAXES” often masks complex trade-offs: short-term gains versus long-term stability, inequality versus fairness, & political convenience versus systemic reform. It emphasizes the need for holistic fiscal strategies that balance revenue generation, equitable distribution, & sustainable investment…

    A 2025/6 “CRASH IS COMING”: ARE YOU PREPARED???

    LET’S HOPE THE MOTTLEY-CREW-GOV IS WATCHING, READING & LISTENING

    #FollowTheMoney

    #SemperFidelis

  26. Terence Blackett Avatar
    Terence Blackett

    KEEP WATCHING THE MARKETS – STORM CLOUDS ARE GATHERING

  27. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Minister Straughn is looking very Zelenskyesque, for they too have a blue and yellow flag with a Trident as their symbol. And Z wears similar tops, though Straughn’s is much fancier.

  28. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Remember, this Resilience and Regeneration is a Fund, formerly known as the Catastrophe Fund, is under the umbrella of the NISSS. While the Minister promised to Report annually on THIS renamed Fund, is there a suggestion the rest of the NISSS will not be reporting?
    My simple advice. Do not pay a cent into this Fund, UNTIL the GoB produces recent Reports for the NISSS. Otherwise, this just becomes another slush fund, without accountability. It sounds sweet, and worthwhile, but don’t be goaded into expecting it will operate any differently from existing NISSS Funds
    #SHOWustheREPORTS


  29. The PM wearing a mask?


  30. @NO

    Listened closely when he mentioned the fund if he would update the country the bigger issue of the financial governance of the fund. The wait continues.


  31. Straughn can’t read well. He obviously did not write this budget. It’s too hard to follow him.

    Seems like election time comes soon.


  32. History recalls that Barrow once gave a budget speech of about 20 minutes. Maybe 1976 circa.

    Of course, history also recalls that Tom Adams is said to have jumped to his feet wanting to reply right away.

    The following election was thusly won next. For that budget reply was associated with the presentation of cheques or fake cheques with the name EWB, as Tom said, being receiver of funds, a bribe. Sydney Burnett-Alleyne, Carlton Brathwaite and HARP were also cited.

    But with Straughn, it can’t be a budget for sooo much shiite to be included.


  33. Straughn is an idiot. He has no idea about food. Salt is a necessary mineral. It’s not an enemy.

    Where are the initiatives to spawn new industrial sectors.

    All small talk!


  34. Say what you like i going get 3 free peticures a year now!

    So how much the water bill going up by?


  35. Looks like there is a dream to pursue an export led effort based on life sciences and digital initiatives. We pray this materializes in our lifetime.


  36. @John A

    Hope Straughn clarified your concern regarding small businesses having to pay prepayments.


  37. Yes that is a start, what he needs to do now is remove the need for small business to have to go through the annual corporate registration, as this is causing many to pay corporate secretairies to help with this work. Also small businesses dont change directors and corporate offices often, most are owned by the same people from cradle to grave. We could not need the $100 from each of them that badly if it means burdening that sector with professional cost several times higher than the fee.


  38. My attention was drawn to the back page of Sunday Sun March 9 2025. How could Dale Marshall with his millions be so heartless. Not one vote for the BLP. I am awaiting settlement after getting injured on duty over 6 years.


    PAYMENT SHOCK


    By Maria Bradshaw


    mariabradshaw@nationnews.com


    The decades-long practice of judges ordering interim payments in personal injury matters has come to a screeching halt.


    In a recent ruling, the Court of Appeal determined that a judge had no jurisdiction either in statute or under the court’s inherent jurisdiction, to make such an order.


    The decision has left some in the legal fraternity in limbo, as they told the Sunday Sun it could have dire consequences for many injured parties who were already suffering from the long delays in such matters and depended on the payments for surgeries, medical care or incidental expenses.


    They are now calling on Government to have interim payment orders legalised as a matter of urgency with one senior attorney pointing out that to wait could put more pressure on Government’s already ailing social services and health care system.


    Shot by police


    Ironically, the decision was as a result of an appeal brought in the name of the Attorney General challenging an order by a High Court judge for Government to make an interim payment of $100 000 to Omar Durant, who was shot by police multiple times about the body in 2006 and who suffered “catastrophic injuries”.


    Durant was travelling in a car with Jamaican brothers Richard and Milton Gordon when police ambushed the vehicle and opened fire on them along Brighton, St George, killing Richard on the spot. Durant, who worked with one of the brothers and was on his way to a bar with them, sued the Attorney General, the Commissioner of Police, as well as police officers Shawn Dawe, Anthony Hall and Gladstone Worrell.


    On February 26, 2021, a judgment was entered in default of defence with damages to be assessed in March 2023. However, on that date, the AG’s office was not ready to proceed and requested an adjournment. While the adjournment was granted, the judge ordered, among other things, that Durant be paid $100 000 on or before June 12, 2023, with interest thereon at a rate of six per cent per annum or $16.44 per diem from that day until payment.


    The AG’s office appealed this decision and requested that the order for interim payment be set aside or reversed. Attorneys for the AG submitted that Barbados had no jurisdiction to order an interim payment. They also argued that the making of the order in the manner which was employed by the judge was procedurally incorrect and that the Supreme Court had no inherent jurisdiction to grant an interim payment before final adjudication of an action, while submitting that such a jurisdiction must be given by an Act of Parliament.


    Attorney Verla De Peiza, who represented Durant, in response charged it was the custom of the courts in this jurisdiction to grant interim payments, particularly in personal injury matters which, she said, was an integral part of the fabric of the law.


    She pointed out that the legislation authorised the Rules Committee to make rules for the effective management of interim payments. She called the appeal an abuse of process and an attempt to circumvent compliance with the order of the court.


    In determining whether the judge had jurisdiction to make the order, the Court of Appeal noted the case was “somewhat novel in this jurisdiction and the facts were unusual”.


    The judges said: “Undoubtedly, the jurisdiction to grant interim payments is highly valuable. This jurisdiction must be, however, grounded in either statute or be part of the inherent jurisdiction of the court. To conclude, the court cannot provide jurisdiction to exercise the power to award interim payments where there is no statutory authority. The Rules Committee is authorised only to make rules to regulate the power to award an interim payment. It is not clothed with the authority to confer such a power on the High Court, that remains within the bosom of the legislature.


    “We allow the appeal, on the ground that the trial judge had no jurisdiction either in statute or under the court’s inherent jurisdiction to make an interim payment order in this matter. Therefore, the order for granting an interim payment to the intended Respondent is null and void and must accordingly be set aside.”


    During a coroner’s inquest in 2009, Durant said after the police sprayed the vehicle with bullets he got out with his hands up and said: Officer, I am only 18 and I don’t want to die. Help!’” Durant said he was ordered to lie face down on the ground and when he complied was shot several times about the body.


    “I heard ‘clax! clax!’ and the shots jumped me. I felt shots in my belly and my leg. I was in shock and I heard two more shots again and I felt a shot in my right shoulder, but I could not see who was shooting because a light was shining in my face.”


    He said he heard a voice ask: “What are we going to do with the little one,” and someone answered: “We will say he was in the back saying ‘shoot them! shoot them’.”


  39. @David A few weeks ago we spoke about the excess primary surplus the the government was going to record by march 31. Well it seems like they’ve decided to take that money make a $300 payment to everybody lol. The reason why they did not decide to give more narrow, permanent tax relief? Two words, Donald Trump. The presence of Trump in the White House has made it harder to predict or forecast what will happen in the next financial year.
    When they come back to comitee next week I hope they take the rest of the excess surplu and spend it on infrastructure.


  40. @General

    Do not know what to think with these modern politicians who seem to be in perpetual election mode.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading