← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

One day coming soon some disgruntled persons will attempt a Sidney Burnett Alleyne.

On the 15 July 2023 Prime Minister Mia Mottley sat down with veteran journalist David Ellis (see 90 minutes interview below) to answer questions raised early in the administration after she became the first woman to win government on 25 May 2018.

Interview with Prime Minister Mia Mottley

The blogmaster from time to time has circled back to this interview to use it as a measure of performance of Prime Minister Mottley and the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) from 2018 to the present.

You will hear her stout defence for appointing the largest Cabinet per 1000 of population in the world. She will now argue the fact her government was reelected in the controversial snap election in January 2022 and won another clean sweep confirmed the electorate bought into government’s playbook. The blogmaster is of the view it was more a case that in the land of the blind a one eye woman is queen.

The other issue from the interview that requires repeat discussion is Mottley’s perspective on how the Freundel Stuart administration squandered tax dollars to support party hacks as consultants. Fast forward to about 25 minutes into the interview to hear her dip into the ‘red bag’ to talk a lot and say noting about the issue of tax dollars used to pay several consultants.

The blogmaster accepts that recruiting outside of the parliamentary group maybe required for specialized jobs – running a government must be complex. However, it is clear both BLP and DLP have abused the appointment of consultants through the years. It continues today even in a harsh economic environment where a caring government should be expected to make decisions that are sympathetic to the needs of the people.

We definitely need a different kind of politics in Barbados. This week DLP President Ronnie Yearwood was carried in the media instructing his party on the need to rebuild trust with the public. He is correct, the average Barbadian has become fully disillusioned with the type of politics being practiced in Barbados. The blogmaster like many had hoped Mia Mottley and the BLP would have exploited the overwhelming mandates received at the polls in 2018 and 2022 to introduce a new politics, a new way of governing. It looks like the same old, same old.

Too many dismiss the caller on the talk shows who goes with the moniker Anti-America because of his oftentimes brusque delivery style. However, for those who take the time to listen to his message, he seems to be hitting close to the mark to what is required to drive change in Barbados. The current governance system serves its narrow interest by growing the bellies of members of the political directorate, serfdoms and campaign donors at the expense of the proletariat.

Why has the local fourth estate relinquished its role to actively pursue information in the interest of the public? Why is it so difficult for the public to be informed who are ALL the consultants on government’s payroll? One day coming soon some disgruntled persons will attempt a Sidney Burnett Alleyne.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

55 responses to “Politicians too fat, cabinet too large, too many consultants”


  1. Off topic recently heard Mr Blackett saying the cabinet is a cost over run on brasstacks.I had to listen to 5he repeat later on.This coming from a man who as minister for 10 years in my view said or did little of consequence.In my view he is best remembered for keeping noise for the reinstatement of their 8 percent pay cur and for being reported involve in the cussfest of Ms Mottley near the stadium.He was in my view onwe of the biggest cost overruns of the last dem government.In fact most of them were except in my view, Mr Sealy, Mr M. Lashley in housing and to a lesser extent Mt S. Lashley in culture and Mr Inniss as health minister.I gone.


  2. Franklyn blasts Govt over NIS

    There’s a lot of injustice in Barbados, says trade unionist Caswell Franklyn, while pointing an accusing finger at Government.
    “I hate injustice,” he said as he delivered the Astor B. Watts Lunchtime Lecture at the Democratic Labour Party’s headquarters in George Street, Belleville, St Michael, yesterday.
    He took particular aim at the Barbados Labour Party administration and its management of the National Insurance Fund, claiming that the Government’s write-off of $1.5 billion was the reason the fund was in difficulty. Franklyn tracked the fund from former Prime Minister Sir Lloyd Erskine Sandiford’s period of the 1990s to present day.
    The former senator, appointed by the People’s Party for Democracy and Development during the 2018 to 2022 term, said that Sir Lloyd, in the late 1980s, delayed implementing changes when it was widely held that the fund would go bust by 2035 unless that was done.
    He said the late prime minister delayed implementing recommendations until after elections in 1991, but “all hell brek loose” and eventually Barbados Labour Party leader Owen Arthur came to power and implemented the recommendations.
    Franklyn told those gathered and following online that Arthur took the retirement age from 65 to 67 and changed the formula for calculating National Insurance to pay out less money, but contributions to it were increased. From there, he added, the fund started to grow and there was hope it was out of the woods, but Government borrowed money from it with the promise to pay back.
    That did not occur, he said. Instead, $1.3 billion owed to the fund was written off.
    “That write-off has endangered the National Insurance Fund but they are not saying that,” Franklyn stated, adding that he was expecting to receive his pension by a particular age.
    However, the proposals are to increase the retirement age to 68 along with 750 contributions, up from 500.
    “National Insurance money is not the Government’s money. It is held in trust by the National Insurance Board to pay pensions and other benefits and if there is a surplus, you can invest. That is what it is supposed to do,” he declared.
    “You know why that is dangerous for people? I actually had to counsel people who couldn’t get promoted in the Public Service and they leave the Public Service and gone about their business. Some have gone [overseas] and made sure they had their 500 contributions in case things didn’t work out out there,” he said.
    Now they were being told it will be 750, he said, and his advice to those who asked him was to return and put in the additional contributions.
    “It is short-sighted. You are not thinking how it is going to affect people,” Franklyn said of the move. (AC)

    Source: Nation


  3. Wait a freaking minute! Caswell Franklyn giving a speech at DLP HQ? Is that the same Caswell Franklyn that executives of the DLP tried to prevent giving a speech at the St. Peter constituency branch of the DLP?

    The DLP doesn’t know which way is up


  4. @Sargeant

    Yearwood had to make a call, allow the old and disgruntled guard who are narrow minded in focus to ride a position that is popular read NIS or deescalate and wait for his time. Best in mind he is trying to solidify his position. This will come when he wins a seat.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading