The ongoing Brexit debacle has produced a new British Prime Minister and abinet, seemingly intent on mimicking the Disney created urban legend documentary, depicting a lemming-like suicide by leaving the European Union on 31st October 2019, regardless of the cost to its own population and the inevitable effect it will have on both domestic and overseas tourism.

By now I would imagine that our tourism industry policymakers and planners have gone into ‘hyperdrive’ while attempting to fully evaluate the potential damage which resulted in further downward pressure on Sterling against the US$ (last week a 28 month low), together with the consequential repercussion it will have on the cost of living for most UK residents and their ability to absorb massive increases in holiday prices with depleted disposable income.

While we remain a tour operator driven destination those companies will have no alternative but to pass on increased currency and other costs to the consumer, unless once again hoteliers are coerced to accept reduced contracted room rates to save the business.

We have recently witnessed a major airline giving notice of withdrawing from one of our regional competing islands and if media reporting is accurate, the underlying reason is the failure to agree a substantial subsidy to offset the real cost of maintaining the route.

Further reduction in passenger volume on flights into the Caribbean will again bring into question, any airlines justification to sustain service below economically loaded aircraft.

And less we forget, British based airlines flying into the region still have to pay for aviation fuel and leased aircraft in US$.

Another major consideration is that the overwhelming majority of tour operators rely on forward bookings, and the payment of deposits to keep them in business.

Retail prices which are shown in their printed or online brochures are agreed, often a year in advance, based on the rates they negotiate with hotels and villa owners or their management companies.

These prices are of course based on a speculated rate of currency exchange, with perhaps the larger travel entities buying forward (hedging) to hopefully minimize any detrimental impact of a declining Sterling value.

If they cannot absorb any differential, or the hoteliers are not willing to reduce previously agreed rates, the only option is to apply surcharges, which as a former tour operator is loathed by both the holidaymaker and travel company.

Surcharges would be levied across all holidays which involve currencies that are paid for, outside the United Kingdom.

But in our special circumstances, where a whole range of additional taxes have been applied during the last year, it is another step towards being perceived as a destination that no longer offers value-for-money.

I believe ‘we’ are now on that fine line with our tourism offerings, and unless corrective measures are shortly put in place, then everyone who earns a living out of the industry should brace for the impact.

Some may consider these views as alarmist but in the cold light of day, we have no absolute right to demand that people visit Barbados.

We have to earn and entice every single person to our shores and not surprisingly, many of our British arrivals will have to try and justify these huge increases in costs to holiday here.

154 responses to “The Adrian Loveridge Column – B for Bollocks, B for Brexit”


  1. Brexit was always bound to impact Caribbean tourism, negatively, at least in the short and medium term.

    And if Bojo has his way that trend may even enter the longer term.

    Alternatively, should he fail, a normal pattern could return in the medium term.


  2. Over seventeen millions voted to leave:to leave therefore is in keeping with democracy. There seems to be a measure of self-serving on behalf of the writer. There have been lots of prediction of failure but there are only predictions ,no one knows for sure: what about the converse ,prediction of success? Remember prior to the financial crash of 2008 every one was predicting how rosy things were. The world has reached its current stage due to leaps into the unknown despite all the doomsayers . A country has a right to determine what course it wants to follow.


  3. Robert Lucas

    You are much more understanding about social forces than to keep repeating this meaningless meme ‘Over seventeen millions voted to leave:to leave therefore is in keeping with democracy.’

    The British population was ‘unlawfully’ biased by the military psychological operations, psyops, of Cambridge Analytica and others. Now if violations of pruder are election offenses certainly, in a technology age, the use of military tactics on a civilian population to contrive a certain result has also to be illegal.

    This coming from somebody who witnessed the election first-hand and supported Brexit, in principle.

    On the assumption that Britain is a ‘democracy’, or ever was, we are not at all convinced.


  4. Pachamama
    Nevertheless, there seems to be some self-serving on the writer’s part. That was the main point I wanted to exploit. I was wondering whether the concern would have been there under other circumstances.


  5. Robert Lucas

    Of course, we disagree with the rest of what you have said as well


  6. @Pacha

    The argument will always go careening back to whether an ordinary citizen possesses the nous to make the best decisions in a democratic system of government. The challenge is, we have not found a better system.


  7. Robert Lucas

    Very well! We have grown use to the self-serving nature of the writer of this column. In that, we have no disagreement.


  8. David

    If you say you have a democracy. Then, that democracy must be expected to protect the population from all those threats which people acting alone cannot.

    If these psychological operations of Donald Trump and all the other CA clients, including Kamla, were Ebola we would expect that populations would have been protected.

    To give such results continuing legitimacy is indeed the end of the specious notions of democracy which may not exist.


  9. @Pacha

    Your comment is the antithetical to the one earlier. How can a government protect people from themselves AND at the same time be forced to honour a referendum that reflected 50% of the view give or take to honour same democracy?


  10. David

    It was you and RL who posited, and always posit, in your case, the presence of democracy, not us.

    Our contention is that a real democracy, which should be an economic construct at its centre, would protect the population, not only from voter interference, but poverty and so on.

    Maybe you are confusing the presence of a government, as currently understood as an elitist construction, with what we will contend a real democracy should be.


  11. @Pacha

    Thanks, reconfirming the ideologue in you that is all.

  12. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Adrian
    @ David BU

    We have to live with uncertainty. There is no way that we can know the unknown. We need to have and design countermeasures . There is no other way.

    The British voted for Brexit and any democratic government should fulfill the wishes of the majority. The mistake of the UK government was to acquiesce to a referendum which negates their and our constitution. Mob rule is not the same as Democracy.

  13. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    Our system of Governance is complex. It has a network of checks and balances which attempt to ensure there are second thoughts on certain measures/decisions. Most of the time our system weeds out /strains out knee jerk decisions. Common sense is not very common.


  14. My question to the tourism players here is besides moaning, what are you all planning to do to add value to the UK visitor in light of what might be a protracted sterling trading close to the Euro?

    Will there be a unified approach to offer promotions like ” pay for 6 nights get the 7th free” or are you all hoping if you pray hard Brexit will go away?

    You see all I have been hearing from the industry is moans and groans about what it will do to us. I am yet to hear from them or the Minister what they intend to do for it.


  15. @John A

    Any truth to the story out there that Peter Odle is being promoted as a candidate for knighthood? Some are concerned that a lot of the revenue from Virgin Holidays never reached Barbados shores.

  16. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU

    I may be mistaken but is there not a limit to the number of knights alive? The value in these awards is in their scarcity.


  17. @John A August 5, 2019 10:06 AM.

    A very insightful post. They are always saying that they operate at a loss. They are always hollering for more aid from government. A lot of them refuse to pay the water bills due to BWA. The number of handouts received by this industry is unbelievable.


  18. Robert Lucas, sadly your last comments carry very little creditability or truth. As a hotel owner for 30 years please list all the concessions we get and LIST the ‘lot’ of hoteliers who refuse to pay the water bills to the BWA. We are still waiting payment of due VAT refunds since February 2013.


  19. Robert Lucas

    Now, this is the open secret of Barbados and the people who the state have and will continue to carry, forever.

    From its very beginning the tourist industry existed as dependent on the state, the people of Barbados. In this respect it is no different than the sugar industry for much of its own history.

    And if we were to extrapolate to central government performance over time – these are where the net losses can be located.


  20. @ David.

    I didn’t hear about Odle but I don’t see why he should be knighted anyhow. But she is the boss.


  21. We are unsurprised that the writer would so respond.

    But he’s not talking to idiots. We have to look at all the costs and assets the people of Barbados have invested into this industry – even the friendly smiling faces that hoteliers like Loveridge and his progenitors seem to believe they are entitled to, while building a racist industry in Barbados, never stop begging for corporate welfare while becoming less and less able to deliver a better quality of life for Bajans.


  22. @ Adrian Loveridge
    I might have embellished things a bit by saying a lot, but you cannot dispute the fact that some hotels in the past did not pay their water bills. As for concessions ,you personally may not have gotten any ,but you cannot dispute the fact that others have gotten concessions and that the tourism industry as a whole is always hollering out or concessions


  23. For years, successive DLP & BLP administrations have been offering concessions to the tourism and agriculture sectors.

    Government has assisted that industry by establishing a $30M Tourism Investment Fund; then there was the $20M Small Hotels Fund, both of which were to facilitate the formation of small hotels and tourism related businesses.

    The hotel industry was also given land and value added tax concessions

    If you read the Amendment to the Tourism Development Act, Cap. 341 (2014), “for hotels to be granted an exemption from the duties and taxes payable for the local purchase or importation of supplies not listed in the Second Schedule, including stores of food, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, where the supplies are required for the operation or development of the tourism product or tourism project.”

    On February 18, 2018 during her contribution to the debate on the Appropriation Bill 2018, Parliamentary Secretary in the Ministry of Tourism, Senator Irene Sandiford-Garner, told the Upper Chamber alcoholic beverages represented 65% of the $7.7M in concessions granted to 43 hoteliers in 2017. She also mentioned these beverages accounted for 78% of the total concessions granted to hotels in 2016.

    Under the Tourism Development Act, Cap. 341 (2002), the industry was granted Customs Duty or Income Tax concessions may be granted under the Tourism Development Act in respect of:
    (1). Duty-free importation of building materials and equipment during construction and rehabilitation;
    (2). Duty-free importation of supplies for refurbishment of hotels, restaurants, villas and sports and recreation facilities for tourism purposes;
    (3). Extended tax holidays/write-off of capital expenditure and accelerated write-off of interest;
    (4). Training of employees;
    (5). Marketing.

    These are just a few.

    It is also a known fact that several hotels allow their water bills to accumulated excessive amounts of arrears. For example, as far back as 1996, a 5 star hotel, Royal Pavillion, owed the BWA thousands of dollars in arrears. The BWA disconnected the water supply when the hotel was “full,” causing management to immediately settle the arrears.

  24. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Pacha

    With you on this one. The hoteliers are just like the plantation owners of yore. They want to fleece the treasury.
    @ Dr. Lucas
    You are correct. There is a reason why the local hoteliers never developed a product like Sandals. They used the hotels as personal cash cows ; run up debt ; refused to pay in deducted national insurance; in many cases treated workers very shabbily.


  25. A B thing and a D thing.
    (My take)
    An interesting picture is emerging. We have two competingt stories and I believe both.

    Note that my belief in one group is 100% based on the information cited. It is quite possible that Mr Loveridge (for some reason) did not recieve all the benefis he is “entitled” to…

    We would like to believe that the two Barbadoses exist in certain areas of our endeavors, but they may exist even in areas that we would not epect them to exist in.


  26. My last comment on this matter…
    Two men in the same busines may handle the payment of VAT in different ways.
    One may pay every cent that he collected to the treasury. The other may hold to the collected VAT for his own use.
    When VAT debt is forgiven and penalties are waived, can we say that we applied the law to the two businessmen in the same manner?

    The first businessman would resent being lumped with the second fellow.


  27. Sir William

    We well remember auditing a top hotel where a manager had to cancel a whole contract because the owners told him that too many Black Americans where in house and that the few Whites there were feeling uncomfortable.

  28. SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife Avatar
    SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife

    @Pachamama August 5, 2019 7:48 AM “This coming from somebody who witnessed the election first-hand and supported Brexit, in principle.”

    Why did you, in principle, support Brexit.

  29. SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife Avatar
    SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife

    @David August 5, 2019 8:20 AM “whether an ordinary citizen possesses the nous.”

    Nothing much wrong with the ordinary citizen.

    But much, much wrong with deceitful, lying, greedy, self-serving politicians.

    Much.

  30. SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife Avatar
    SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife

    The United Kingdom has a population of 67,545,757, so 17 million voted for Brexit. How is that democratic? Some of the idiots who voted for Brexit in 2016 are long, long dead, and some who did not get to vote are now of voting age. So how is “honouring” the vote of dead people democratic? And how can a place be considered a democracy when it ignores the wishes of ALL those tens of thousands who have come of voting age sine June 23, 2016?

    My old man had the profoundest understanding of democracy of anyone I have ever met. In Barbados’ 2003 election he was old and he anticipated dying before 2008, and indeed he did die. Because he was old the BLP sent transportation to pick him up to vote, the DLP sent transportation to pick him up to vote. He told both and all parties the same thing. I am old and I will not have to live with the result if I should vote in this election, therefore i am not voting. let those who will have to live with the result, vote. i will abstain. And abstain he did. And died he did less that three years into that term. My old man finished his schooling at age 11.

    He understood democracy.

    Those elderly, selfish British fools who voted for Brexit in 2016, and have now gone long and de’d…


  31. @SSS

    Who is that the ordinary citizens elect to office repeatedly and which pool are they selected from?

    Are they aliens who serve as politicians or friends and family that attended school, church and other places with you and others on the blog.

  32. SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife Avatar
    SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife

    The United Kingdom dos NOT have to honor the wishes of dead voters.

    It is stupid to do so.

    Is Boris Johnson stupid?

    Maybe some of those who live in the U.K can tell me.

  33. SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife Avatar
    SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife

    Is a dead 87 year old more valuable to a community than a living 17 year old?

  34. SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife Avatar
    SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife

    @David August 5, 2019 4:18 PM “…that attended school, church and other places with you and others on the blog.”

    David i have been a regular church goer from my morning days, and I’ve NEVER seen a politician attend my church regularly [big, big parish churches, and small community chapels] From time to time a politico turns up generally when a campaign is on. But my experience has been that our politicians, all of them seem to be unbelievers/atheists, but seem afraid to say so publicly, less they offend the believing electorate.

    Their attendance at weddings and funerals does not count.

  35. SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife Avatar
    SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife

    It is like how some of them are homosexual and bisexual, but seem afraid to say so publicly, less they offend the heterosexual majority electorate.


  36. To simplify it for you, politicians came from among us before we elected them.

  37. SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife Avatar
    SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife

    @David August 5, 2019 4:18 PM “Are they aliens who serve as politicians.”

    Serve what David?

    They very much desired the office of politician. They fought long and hard to get the office.

    And when they get there we the people pay them very, very well. Pay then very nice pensions too, even when they phuck up the place, they still get a nice pension. Oftentimes it is the best paid job, and the best pension they will have in their entire lives.

    What service you talking ’bout?

    Stupssseee!!!


  38. @ SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife August 5, 2019 4:15 PM

    Do not be so dogmatic about old people and dying. In yesterday’s “Daily mail online” there was an article about the two oldest people in the UK. Both 112 years old. One died a couple of days ago. Because your old man shuffled off this orb so soon, it doesn’t equate that all old people will shuffle off soon. It was a bad analogy, I, as a skeptic refer you to the Bible where there is some talk about fruit and flowers, where the green fruit fall as readily as the yellow fruit ..I can see that you didn’t pay much attention at Sunday school. I agree that you may have a point about the young having to live with the consequences: on the other hand a bit of deprivation might do the current generation a host of good, they want everything on a platter. they don’t even want to walk anywhere( an aside)..


  39. @ Robert Lucas

    I was hoping to come home this evening and see this thread full of ideas the industry was going to implement to fight the falling sterling in a post Brexit economy, but alas I see nothing.

    That basically summarises our response to challenges on the whole though doesn’t it? We as a small dot in the ocean will have to live with their exit regardless. So my question is simply this.

    Instead of bickering over what we can’t change what will we implement to try and ensure arrivals and fight the effects of the falling sterling?

    When I ask what will ” we do” I am speaking to all involved. The hoteliers, the Minister of tourism, the Minister of finance, in other words all of wunna.

    Our mission is to be pro active and try and hold on to market share its that simple. You really think the powers in England give a rat’s ass about the views of a few bajans over their exit from the EU?

    Address what we can control and let us prepare for the fallout, instead of discussing issues we have no say or control over.

  40. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @robert lucas August 5, 2019 4:47 PM
    “… an article about the two oldest people in the UK. Both 112 years old.”
    ++++++++++++++
    Robert you are too smart to confuse what you wrote for a rational argument. The statistical outliers that you cite do not in any way weaken SirSimpleSimonPresidentForLife’s argument. The demographic breakdown of the Leave vote in the way it was skewed towards older voters make it obvious that the number of those Leave voters that have died since the referendum is considerably greater than the vote margin by which the Leave campaign won.

    This is not to mention that the Leave campaign won through outright deception and fraud: they cheated, they told gross lies, and they broke election laws.

    It is disingenuous to the point of outright lying to pretend that the Brexit referendum was an expression of democracy. It was not.

  41. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @John A August 5, 2019 5:36 PM
    “You really think the powers in England give a rat’s ass about the views of a few bajans over their exit from the EU?”
    ++++++++++++++++
    Of course they do not John. In fact they do not even give a rat’s ass about the views of the majority of UK citizens over their exit from the EU; that is why they refuse to hold a second referendum in which the election laws are enforced.

    Your problem John, is that you list “all involved” in Barbados, but have this ridiculous view that it is mainly about the tourism industry (“hoteliers, the Minister of tourism, the Minister of finance”). The tourism industry is a sunset industry. We need to htch our economic wagon to a rising star, not let it be dragged under by continuing and expanding corporate welfare on a dead horse.


  42. SSS

    Because we want to break up Britain and then evade it, make slaves of them all, make colonies of it’s constituent parts.


  43. invade


  44. @ peterlawrencethompson

    I wanted you to reflect on “.I can see that you didn’t pay much attention at Sunday school.” I would never have pegged you as a backslider.. According to the bible ” God moves in a mysterious way” I leave you to ponder on it. You must have more faith.


  45. @PLT

    I admit the industry has it’s challenges and the truth is going forward it will not be business as usual for sure. Having said that I still see us as having an economy where tourism will continue to play a major role.

    What I would like to see though is more diversification of our economy and not such a heavy dependence on tourism. For Instance we started out all hot and ready over the solar energy sector and then what did government do, but cap it and introduce taxation. There I thought would of been a sector worth nurturing, as it could of saved us hard currency for sure in petroleum imports.

    This government for instance seems to be throwing all it’s hopes behind tourism too, with its infamous hotel corridor. In the meantime every time the rain falls I must buy imported tomatoes and lettuce as we have no structured agricultural sector. Why doesn’t government assemble a green house project and then lease those facilities back to farmers? No instead I must buy red tasteless imported tomatoes and water filled iceberg lettuce every rainy season.

    It’s the very basics that we fail to focus on, like trying to get all we can out of the services we supply tourism for a start. Instead of that we build more concrete structures and then feed the visitors on imported food items instead of expanding our own local production. One would think we would first try to extract every cent we could out the sector we have first, both in supply of local products and attaining a better year round occupancy figure.


  46. @Robert Lucas
    “Self serving” is hardly an issue. There was a slim majority in favour of Brexit with all the lies and jingoistic statements made. How we need the freedom to do our own trade deals and that there was a world out there eagerly waiting to do us great trade deals.
    Quoted — India whose foreign minister has said any deals have to be in India’s favour, China –Ha Ha!,
    Japan – even last week someone mentioned the Japan-EU agreement and only having to swap Britain for EU on it, something the UK-Japanese society has said japan has already rejected, USA (first) – leader of the free world — sorry tethered world.

    A simple question was put in a referendum by a simple man, the one who promised to” hug a hoodie”.

    Brexit has seriously fractured UK society and all the queen’s horses and all the queen’s men has never looked like putting it back together again.

  47. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @robert lucas
    Since God is a construct of human imagination it is axiomatic that He moves in mysterious ways… indeed it is the only way He can move.

  48. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Pacha
    Not surprising at all!
    I once heard a White tour rep saying to tourists that they will choke on cou cou. Racism against Black American tourists was common place. Even at the level of gigolos , the white ones were allowed in the hotel rooms but not the black ones.

  49. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @John A
    You “see us as having an economy where tourism will continue to play a major role” simply because you are not looking far enough ahead. Yes it will still be important in five years, albeit more specialised in niche markets. That is not the problem.

    We need to be looking ahead thirty years to a point where our tourism industry will be irrelevant. What are we going to replace it with? We have to solve that problem within the next five to ten years if we want our children and grandchildren to have a living standard at least as good as ours is.


  50. @ John A August 5, 2019 5:36 PM

    Nothing will be done. All of Barbados’ eggs have been placed in one basket. They do not know what to do, although they know that doing nothing is going to result in disaster “The science of regrettable decisions” by Robert Pearl, in VOX 24th. July 2019 explains it all ( you should check out the article). Basically, it explains how supposedly intelligent people end up making decisions that results in ruin. For example those two fellows Weiner and Fogle, the former a politician who sent repeated naked photos of himself to women and the latter a Subway high flier with under aged girls. They knew what they were doing was wrong but kept on doing so. Similarly the elites around here know that the country is on a downward spiral, but it is more comforting to pretend that it isn’t and continue on the same course. You must view all of this against a back ground of two first class spin doctors ,Mottley and Persaud, who like to hear the sound of their own voices. I am sure that they, after a while actually believe all the spiel they are sprouting. You must also bear in mind that Owen Arthur also said ,having become bereft of ideas, that Barbados must sell its land.. At least he was honest and admitted that he didn’t know what to do: he was also consistent by saying sell land to the highest bidder. These are the idiots we have leading Barbados.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading