Guyana’s Coalition Government Asked to Reject No Confidence Vote
Submitted by Rickford Burke, President of the Guyana Institute for Democracy (CGID)
Dear Editor:
The Caribbean Guyana Institute for Democracy (CGID) reiterates to all Guyanese and the international community that the December 21, 2018 no confidence vote against the APNU+AFC coalition government of Guyana was unconstitutional. The vote violated several provisions of extant law. The coalition government must embrace all aspects of the constitution as well as the will of the people as expressed in the 2015 elections. Consequently, we call on the government to reject the invocation of Article 106 (6) and (7) of the Guyana constitution by the Parliament of Guyana. This is why the vote was unconstitutional:
(i) AFC government Member of Parliament (MP) Charrandas Persaud who voted with the opposition PPP for the motion violated Article 156.3 (a) and (b) of the Guyana constitution. Article 156.3 (a) prohibits a Member of Parliament from voting against his or her party’s list or side of the House, unless he or she declare that intent in writing to the Speaker. Article 165.3 (b) Mandates that if a Member declares an intent to vote against his own party list he or she ceases to be a Member and must be immediately be expelled from Parliament. Charrandas Persaud failed to declare his intention to vote against his party’s list and for another list. His failures violated both Article 156.3 (a) and (b). His vote is therefore unlawful and should be vitiated. He must also be expelled by the Speaker as prescribed in the law.
(ii) Charrandas Persaud violated Article 155. 1 (a) of the Guyana constitution. Article 155.1 states that “No person shall be qualified for election as a Member of the National Assemble who: (a) “Is by virtue of his or own act, under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience or adherence to a foreign power or state.” Charrandas Persaud is a citizen of Canada, assumption on which he took an oath of allegiance to Queen Elizabeth II. He was therefore not qualified to be a Member of Parliament.
(iii) There is mounting evidence that Charrandas Persaud, opposition politicians and persons in the business community conspired to overthrow the democratically elected government of Guyana. The conspiracy involved using Charrandas Persaud’s no confidence vote to bring down the government. The opposition PPP allegedly engineered the payment of a multimillion dollar bribe to Persaud for his vote. When this information became public, he admitted the bribe, saying in a Facebook post, “So what if I was paid?” Bribing a Member of Parliament is a crime under the Laws of Guyana Criminal Offences Act Chapter 8:01. Sections 336 and 338. The Speaker or the courts will now have to make a determination about this alleged corrupt transaction. The Guyana Police Force has launched an investigation in this treasonous, bribery transaction.
CGID therefore resolutely rejects the notion that the will of the people of Guyana, expressed through the 2015 general elections, and a democratically elected government should be terminated on the basis of a criminal act and a vote that violated Article 155. 1 (a) and Article 156.3 (a) and (b) of the constitution. Moreover, there are serious questions about whether the confidence was passed by the legally required number of votes. “A corrupt tree cannot bring forth good fruit.”
CGID therefore calls on Speaker of the National Assemble, Dr. Barton Scotland, to nullify the no confidence vote, as Parliament cannot violate the constitution. CGID also calls on the people of Guyana to stand and rise up their voices in rejection of the attempt to overthrow their duly elected government.
Rickford Burke
President of the Guyana Institute for Democracy (CGID)
Yes! reject payoff and crime! The crook Minister need to be looked upon very hard, If the way bought like most Ministers in Barbados, He needs to be jailed then hang him with hemp rope!
LikeLiked by 1 person
On a related note the PPP plans to announce its presidential candidates next month. Declaring an interest are Anil Nandlall, Irfaan Ali, Gail Teixeira and Frank Anthony. Interesting is that all of them indicate should the the presidency Jagdeo will play an important part in the government.
LikeLike
”Article 156.3 (a) prohibits a Member of Parliament from voting against his or her party’s list or side of the House, unless he or she declare that intent in writing to the Speaker.”
This seems highly irregular!
LikeLike
@Pacha
Is it irregular if it is stated?
LikeLike
David
It is irregular with the traditions of all british parliamentary practice it seems to this non lawyer.
We have never seen members constrained in this way.
LikeLike
Thanks for the context Pacha. Let us see if one of the legal people opines on your observation.
LikeLike
In addition, these grounds seem specious except those relating to the determination of the 50+1 threshold which seems the best and clearest case strongly supportive of the governing coalition.
We expect them to prevail.
LikeLike
David
We just got a report, from a reliable source, an insider, in the Co-operative Republic of Guyana.
The Speaker has ruled that the law courts can decide the matter.
The Opposition did not show up, we are told.
Given the constellations of forces, the timetable, the requirement that it should work its way up the court system to possibly the CCJ – this is the equivalent of ‘kicking the matter in the tall grass’
LikeLike
LikeLike
Having reviewed the ruling of Baron Scotland, though he says the matter should go to the courts, he did not correct his earlier erroneous ruling.
There is to be a meeting between Jagdeo and Granger.
All types of scenarios are now in play with both parties relatively weak with challengers within both the PPP and PNC led coalition, possibly new formations by leading figures as well.
LikeLike
LikeLike
I tell you that speaker real shitey.
They need to get rid of him.Reading reports since he came in – he does not handle the proceedings in the Assembly well.
David Granger is a weak,ineffectual leader – give me kemraj ramjattan any day – or Basil Williams or anybody so.
LikeLike
LikeLike
There are 30 members of the parliament with dual citizenship. No wonder this is not a disqualifier retroactively for prrsaud.
David, thsnks for ignoring the naysayers in recognizing that we can’t really understand barbados unless we know all the forces acting around it.
LikeLike