The Jeff Cumberbatch Column – On the Prevention of Corruption 5

Of course the proof of the pudding will ultimately lie in the eating, but the Integrity in Public Life is not short on provisions designed to ensure the reduction of opportunities for specified persons in public life to profit from corruption.

In addition to mandating the declaration of particulars by these individuals that we treated at length in the last installment of this piece two weeks ago, the Bill also requires that every Member of Parliament must also file with the Commission a statement of registrable interests that must be kept by the Commission in a Register of Interests. The content of this statement is catalogued at Clause 38 of the Bill and appears calculated to disclose the trading and commercial interests of the member and of his or her spouse and children. Oddly enough, it also includes at sub-sub-clause g-

“…particulars of any political, trade or professional association to which the person belongs…”

Since, as has been observed before, the legislation does not attempt to engage with an eminently possible source of political corruption; that of the electoral campaign financing of political parties, this particular appears anomalous in a group comprised of existing directorships, beneficial interests in land, and investments in corporate entities, among others. Even odder still is the provision in Clause 38 (2) that appears at first blush to defeat the purpose of the inquiry itself –

Nothing in this section shall be taken to require disclosure of the actual amount or extent of any financial benefit, contribution or interests.

Thus the statement alone of the interest suffices for the purpose, although it is not immediately clear, at least to this writer, how a determination of corruption might be made in the absence of an increase in the value of a particular interest.

One possible explanation for this might be the provision in Cl. 39(2) that permits the Register to be inspected by any member of the public. The need to preserve the privacy of the member, it would appear, clearly outweighs the detection of an increase in the unexplained value commercial holdings by the MP.

As it is with the declaration of assets, the Commission is empowered to request further information on the statement, although this must be read subject to Clause 38 (2) cited above, and may conduct an inquiry to ascertain whether there has been a full disclosure as stipulated.

As a matter of drafting style, the Bill introduces the notion of a prohibited interest almost by stealth in Clause 40 (2) without prior warning or definition until it does so belatedly in Clause 42.

According to the former clause,

Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), where the Commission is of the opinion that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a member of the House of Assembly or the Senate has failed to comply with the requirements for the registration of interests under this Part or that such member has acquired a prohibited interest… [Emphasis added]

Clause 42 later defines a prohibited interest as one where-

  1. (a)  the member has notified the Commission of the interest as required by this Act; and

(b)  the Commission is of the opinion that the interest

(i)  is unlikely to affect the member’s obligations under the Code of Conduct; or

(ii)  is likely to affect the member’s obligations under the Code of Conduct but that the member, his spouse or child, as the case may be, has divested himself of the interest or has placed it in a blind trust on such terms and conditions as the Commission considers appropriate.

The Bill additionally creates a number of offences in connection with the failure to file the statement; filing a knowingly incomplete statement or one that is materially false in any particular; a failure to comply with a request of the Commission and a failure without reasonable cause to attend an inquiry called by the Commission and to furnish any requested information or knowingly giving any false or incomplete information in response at the inquiry –Clause 43 (1).

Once again, it bears remarking that the primary monetary fine for these offences on summary conviction is a scarcely dissuasive $ 15 000; a sum worth significantly less in today’s coinage than the fine under the 1929 Prevention of Corruption Act.

However it is possible for this penalty to be enlarged upon by the flouting of the magistrate’s order to make a full disclosure of the property. By clause 43-

Where an offence referred to in subsection (1)(a) or (b) involves the non- disclosure, by a member of the House of Assembly or the Senate, of property which should have been disclosed in a statement of registrable interests, the magistrate shall order the member to make full disclosure of the property within a specified period.

Where a member of the House of Assembly or the Senate fails to comply with an order made pursuant to subsection (2) within the specified period, the offence referred to in subsection (1) shall be deemed to be a continuing offence and the member shall be liable to a further fine of $3 000 for each day on which the offence continues.

Arguably, even more dissuasive still is the punishment prescribed by Clause 44-

A member of the House of Assembly or the Senate who is convicted of an offence under section 36 or 43 is liable, in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law, to be disqualified from holding any public office for a period of 5 years from the date of conviction for the offence.

I propose to conclude this series next week with an examination of the treatment of gifts, the definition of acts of corruption, and analyses of the Code of Conduct and of the Bill’s protection afforded to whistleblowers.

109 comments

  • “WAS WARU ONE OF THOSE TELLERS YOU SUPPOSE? MURDAH!.”

    My corporate experience is private banking..Lawson has never had or seen that level of wealth in his life, he would never had been allowed in that building..not even o pass through.

    Like

  • The Guardian UK online newspaper has an article today on Barbados that everyone should read to further help open their eyes, especially the eyes of majority black population who continue to be robbed and disenfranchised by their own BLACK governments..

    Like

  • David/BU

    A post gone missing.

    Like

  • ” That elderly age who need cash in the short term that can be assisted, while those who don’t need cash in the short term but are happy to get it in the medium term can hold the instruments.

    She said her office was now going through the process “to be able to see the numbers and make the judgement as to what we can afford and to make sure that those persons who are at the end of the days of their lives can live it out in dignity,” Mottley said.”

    Like

  • “This is most common in Barbados once the sureties are aware and present, and an application is made on presentation of an itinerary. I have made similar successful applications for over 100 different clients of all shapes, sizes and colours. I have clients who are studying overseas and return home for court,” said the former president of the Barbados Bar Association. (SP)(Quote)

    Proof, if it were needed, that Barbados is a failed state. The principle of bail is that the accused should always be the beneficiary of any decision, in simple words, that s/he should get his/her freedom.
    But this must not be at the expense of justice. Bail should be granted on condition that the bailee does not, or could not, interfere with the evidence or witnesses.
    A wealthy person facing a serious drug offence must always be assumed to have the ability to influence the evidence: either by meeting up with potential witnesses outside the jurisdiction in order to agree on the evidence (they could meet in the US, UK, Trinidad, wherever).
    However, to change conditions of bail as a deliberate act of the courts is evidence of a flawed system. Why impose conditions when an application to the courts will almost certainly change those conditions?
    In any case, all applications for a change in bail conditions should be made in an open court and the reasons given. It is not secret justice. An application to a judge in chambers is only, or should be, temporary ie so that the accused does not have to sleep in prison, but a full hearing should be held as soon possible in an open court.

    Like

  • The government of Barbados has created a teachable moment.

    Do not wait till you are retired to ” enjoy life “.

    I truly feel sorry for those pensioners who have lost control of their investments.

    Liked by 1 person

  • @Hants

    Your request is noted for a blog on the matter.

    Like

  • Hants do really think that giving your money to the govt or private sector hucksters to invest in your future wise. All I see is politicians and scallywags thinking of their future.

    Like

  • RE T.Inniss October 8, 2018 1:03 PM

    David/BU

    A post gone missing.

    T.Inniss T.Inniss

    MANY OF MINE HAVE GONE MISSING TOO

    BUT I WILL NOT GROVEL OR SCRATCH AND SCRAPE AND LOWER MY SELF LIKE PIECE AND MAKE STATEMENTS LIKE “the Honourable Blogmaster your assistance please with an item ”

    YOU SHOULD NOT GROVEL EITHER

    LET IT GO AS I DO

    THERE IS A WEBSITE CALLED VALUEMD THAT HAS BEEN AROUND SINCE 2003
    IT USED TO VERY POPULAR WITH FOLK RESPONDING RAPIDLY DAILY THROUGHOUT THE DAY AND NIGHT

    IN RECENT TIMES WHEREVER I GO ONLINE I SEE ALL SORTS OF ADS FOR THEM
    NO BODY WORRIES TO POST THERE ANYMORE

    IT IS NO LONGER A ROBUST SITE

    YOU SEE THEY WOULD REMOVE PEOPLE’S POST TOO AND ISSUE WARNINGS AND INFRACTIONS

    THE RESULT IS THAT NOW THE SERVICE IT ONCE PROVIDED IS NO LONGER THERE

    HENCE 200 INDIAN STUDENTS ARE SUFFERING IN BIM TODAY

    WATCH AND WAIT

    THERE ARE RELATIVELY FEWER FOLK POSTING ON BU DAILY IN 2018

    THE FAVORITE ONES CURSE STINK AND TALK SHITE AND ADD LITTLE………CERTAINLY NOT PRISTINE PROSE OR HUMOR

    Like

  • There once was a man named GP
    A doctor and intelect thought he
    But faced with a banshee
    he cited his degree
    while running from waru to the sea

    Liked by 2 people

  • GP

    Thanks my friend.I think this is the 3rd post that was lost for me.I am quietly watching .

    Liked by 1 person

  • GP

    Did you know that Dr Livy Forde passed away?

    I don’t know But I believe he might be one of your contemporaries.

    Like

  • I note the response by David/bu – to a request from Hants to have a blog on the Barbadian pensioners plight.

    I contrast that with repeated requests to put up a blog with Prof. Michael Howard’s response to Bert,or the Charles Jong’s appointment,or the optics of auterity measures while enjoying the nice life with the largest cabinet ever – and on and on.

    Hmmm.

    Well done.

    Like

  • The reality is, the more I hear about those bonds, it seems it was a short term LOAN…from the people who were promised that unrealistic 3.5% return…to the then government, to help the government with cash flow problems they were facing 2 or 3 years ago…

    I don’t see how Mia could change the terms of that loan to the government from the PEOPLE…changing THE TERMS means default on the loan..

    Ah guess Bajans learned another lesson…

    Don’t lend government your money no matter how they beg or plead, it is your money..you DO NOT have to lend it to them…..when the government minister and their friends thief from the treasury and pension fund, let them go find the money and return it….the people are not responsible for helping out government with money.

    Don’t invest your money in anything government is promoting, advertising or endorsing.

    Liked by 1 person

  • RE T.Inniss October 8, 2018 5:44 PM

    GP Did you know that Dr Livy Forde passed away? I don’t know But I believe he might be one of your contemporaries.

    THANKS FOR TELLING ME, CAUSE I DIDNT KNOW
    YES I KNEW HIM FROM HC DAYS
    WE WERE LAST TOGETHER IN PUERTO RICO IN THE SUMMER OF 1996

    Like

  • @ Dr. GP,

    ammmmmmm it would appear like every two weeks I have to explain my predicament to all of BU

    When you write on matters medical I DO NOT unless I want to query a thing that I do not understand, speak about what i do not know, and I would suggest that you do not speak of things that you do not know.

    Today will be my last such share on this matter Selah

    De ole man has been one of the most prolific posters of statements that in many cases are and continue to be rather derogatory euphemism for libelous.

    Let me share this current affairs matter to set a context for all of you

    “…Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoy-an has filed a legal complaint against Zekeriya Euz, the prosecutor who was working on a recent major corruption case and was later appointed by authorities to a less influential position, on the grounds that Euz used threatening, libelous and insulting language against Erdoy-an in his Twitter posts.

    What does that mean to you ammmmmm Dr. GP, it means nothing to you because you are a stranger in a first world country who, while you will post your remarks here about Obama, will be less likely to do so in the United States of America on a website BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO BE WARY OF THE CONSEQUENCES.

    Regularly while taking to the many American xenophobes that i know here I mention that I find it most strange that, in spite of all the hatred they have for “the lovers of Mohammed” NARY ONE OF THEM GOES ANYWHERE, IN PUBLIC, AND SPEAK ILL OF MOHAMED heheheheheheh.

    I did not call your name Dr. GP so there is no need to get disturbed by my observation.

    De grandson and de ole man spent some 763+ days running an anti campaign against Fumbles and Stinkliar and the CoP and the AG and Mugabe and any and all enemies of Barbados.

    Therefore de ole man knows full well why people like Colonel Buggy and my erstwhile buddy SSS stopped posting here on BU, because they were warned and they fear the Night of the Long Knives by Mia Mao Mugabe. I have no such fear because I have seen my end, and if you have time, you will hear of it too.

    Recenty, a poster here broadcast the IP address of the Honourable Blogmaster here on Barbados Underground, DID YOU SEE THAT POST?? it is in the 200. octet.

    And that was removed from the BU blog.

    What does all this drivel mean Dr. GP? Hypervisor, Tails and VPNs and spinning up instances of perishable, untrackable OSes?

    It means that people like de ole man AND the Honourable Blogmaster are “targets” for lawsuits which you, IN THE COMFORT OF YOUR DRAWING ROOM, while you enjoy the brimlers in the Rum Shop, DO NOT HAVE THE SLIGHTEST CLUE ABOUT, nor care for, nor should you as you continue in blissful ignorance.cause you wait for the Rapture. (No insult is intended)

    My “instances” appear to the Honourable Blogmaster as irregular IPs from the Ukraine, Latvia, Russia and all sorts of strange places that will cause his WP platform to block me

    So as a man who posts contentious materials, Dr. GP, de ole man has to protect meself from the faction that is out there with the lawsuits pending.

    And, as a result of all the intrigue, ALL OF MY POST may be held in suspense and the Honourable Blogmaster, who is aware of this circumstance, is kind enough to take my submissions from suspense and post them, ONCE I ASK HIM.

    Now, Dr. GP, let us add another layer to these requests where, as opposed to one BU Blogmaster there are 3 BU BORG and two doan really like de ole man cause “he too bright and tink too much uh heself”

    Liked by 1 person

  • @ the Honourable Blogmaster

    Your assistance please with an item here for Dr. GP, thank you

    Liked by 1 person

  • mr piece
    my posts are quite simple
    they are not taken down because they are libellous
    my posts today teased lawson and waru– simple banter and picong
    no need to remove dem
    i was not putting chaff pun no lumens bull shit
    i am a quite cool collected chap who likes to clown around
    what is so honourable about the blogmasdter? is he God?
    what is to enlightening about the so called LUMENary? that he cant be challenged

    when i was mocvked here by riff raff the mockers were called provocateurs and I was called thin skinned…….their posts were not taken down

    when i mock or have a likkle fun my postss disapear
    you can cuss me if you feel like but i stand by my comments to T Inniss

    I WILL NOT GROVEL OR SCRATCH AND SCRAPE AND LOWER MY SELF AND MAKE STATEMENTS LIKE “the Honourable Blogmaster your assistance please with an item ”

    Like

  • @Dr. GP
    Surely you have noticed the difference in the “blogmasters”. Surely you can recognize when the real David is moderating? Some weeks ago, the moderator lost his temper and was practically shouting at bloggers. He was not our David of old. Our David is a cool character. He placates, intervenes when necessary and sometimes acts a provacateur but never gets angry. Rather, he would warn the bloggers to be careful, but not the other one. Just read carefully and you will see when the other person is moderating. Piece says there are three, but so far I have identified two.

    Liked by 1 person

  • Georgie Porgie

    You have characterized yourself as a cool chap, but I have found you to be a man infused with impetuosity when challenged … which in my judgment and I am quite sure in the judgment of others here is unbecoming of man with your academic credentials. If it is one thing education ought to have taught us either than theory, theorem, and law etc, is equanimity. The ability to keep our emotions under control when tested is a true measure of our education, and I know some will disagree with this simplistic characterization but I stand by.

    Liked by 1 person

  • bajans October 8, 2018 10:54 PM

    @Dr. GP
    Surely you have noticed the difference in the “blogmasters”. Surely you can recognize when the real David is moderating?

    NO I HAVE NOT
    NOR AM I INTERESTED IN WHO IS MODERATING
    I COME HERE FOR MY ENTERTAINMENT WHEN BORED NOT TO DETECT BS
    BUT I PREDICT AGAIN THAT IF THE RUBBISH YOU HAVE DETECTED THAT IS GOING ON
    CONTINUES , BU WILL END UP LIKE VALUEMD…….SIMPLE!

    LEXICON
    YOU CAN TAKE YOUR PSEUDO PSYCHOLOGY ANALYTICS TO THE GARBAGE AND READ JOHN 7:20
    JUDGE RIGHTEOUS JUDGEMENT AND NOT BY THE APPEARANCE!

    NOW ABOUT THIS CHALLENGING SHIT
    I LIKE TO SIT OR LIE HERE AND WITH PLEASURE AND GLEE MOCK SEMI ILLITERATE MORONS WHO “CHALLENGE” ME ON BU

    LIKE THE FOOL THAT INSISTED ON HAVING AN EMERGENCY POSTMORTEM

    OR THE IDIOT THAT SOUGHT TO “CHALLENGE” ON CERVICAL INJURIES

    OR THE JACKASS THAT COULD NOT UNDERSTAND THAT SUGAR IS SUGAR WHETHER IT CAME FROM BEETS OR CANE . AND THAT THERE IS NO REAL DANGER FROM FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP AS FRUCTOSE IS NORMALLY METABOLISED IN THE GLYCOLYTIC PATHWAY

    OR THE TWIT THAT CAME TO FOOL THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE EFFICAY ABOUT VYTORIN

    OR THE OBSTETRIC MORON THAT TOLD ME I W
    WAS NOT THERE WHEN I INSISTED THAT “THEY HAD TO TAKE THE BABY FROM TWO WOMEN AFTER SOME INCIDENT IN THE SHOWER AT QEH WAS NOT A BIG THING

    I DONT GET “EMOTIONAL” OR ANGRY, IF THAT IS WHAT YOU MEAN SIR, I JUST USE MY FEET AND BEAT THAT BAD BOWLING TO A PULP, COOLY AND CALMLY!

    Like

  • Talking Loud Saying Nothing

    Here is the latest developing news of the banker’s wife who spent 16 million at Harrods. She has been unmasked.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-45812210

    Like

  • @45gov
    “he banker’s wife referred to by TLSN is of course black, because they are the most prolific and remorseless thieves on the planet, specialising in impoverishing their own, and wear their corruption like a badge. The spending pattern tells you all you need to know, a la Disgrace Mugabe.
    Anyone offer odds we are dealing with a Nigerian here? 🙁”

    Now you have your own proof that you are a racist… Didn’t you try to imply she was a black woman. You will weasle out by saying “not all Nigerians are Black”

    Like

  • @45gov
    “he banker’s wife referred to by TLSN is of course black, because they are the most prolific and remorseless thieves on the planet, specialising in impoverishing their own, and wear their corruption like a badge. The spending pattern tells you all you need to know, a la Disgrace Mugabe.
    Anyone offer odds we are dealing with a Nigerian here? 🙁”

    Now you have your own proof that you are a racist… Didn’t you try to imply she was a black woman. You will weasle out by saying “not all Nigerians are Black”

    Like

  • GP

    A person can be illiterate and educated whereas a person can be uneducated but literate, so it would be of interest to ascertain your criterion or criteria of a semi-illiterate person?

    Like

  • GP

    With too much knowledge for the skeptic side; with too much weakness for the stoic pride; born but to die; reason but to error… and this sums up those of us with our inflated egoes… knowledge is exponential….

    Like

  • After reading Articles 1,2 3, 4 and 5 I have come to one simple conclusion.

    These people are not serious!

    Like

  • @ the Luminary Jeff Cumberbatch,

    You said and I quote

    “…Where an offence referred to in subsection (1)(a) or (b) involves the non- disclosure, by a member of the House of Assembly or the Senate, of property which should have been disclosed in a statement of registrable interests, the magistrate shall order the member to make full disclosure of the property within a specified period.

    Where a member of the House of Assembly or the Senate fails to comply with an order made pursuant to subsection (2) within the specified period, the offence referred to in subsection (1) shall be deemed to be a continuing offence and the member shall be liable to a further fine of $3 000 for each day on which the offence continues…”

    As de ole man said on Sunday, I would read the article again and get back to you as I started to understand that which i was reading.

    So let me see if i have this “registrable interests” thing correct.

    It is purported that the Prime Minister has interests in the firm Jose & Jose. I have made sure to say purported in this hypothetical example which is only for the purpose of providing an example.

    Let us say that an individual or the Commission does, at a time subsequent to the submission of a disclosure by the Prime Minister, determine that such a “non disclosure has occured” and was perpetuated by the Prime Minister, is de ole man to understand that such would constitute a non disclosure of registrable interests?

    Is de ole man further to understant that she would have to be convicted of the action, and that it would not automatically activate Clause 44, which reads “…A member of the House of Assembly or the Senate who is convicted of an offence under section 36 or 43 is liable, in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law, to be disqualified from holding any public office for a period of 5 years from the date of conviction for the offence…”?

    Forgive de ole man cause I sort of slow with my assimilation of these things…

    Like

  • @ the Honourable Blogmaster, your assistance please with an item here for the Luminary Jeff Cumberbatch thank you

    Like

  • Is de ole man further to understand that she would have to be convicted of the action, and that it would not automatically activate Clause 44, which reads “…A member of the House of Assembly or the Senate who is convicted of an offence under section 36 or 43 is liable, in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law, to be disqualified from holding any public office for a period of 5 years from the date of conviction for the offence…”?

    Where an offence referred to in subsection (1)(a) or (b) involves the non- disclosure, by a member of the House of Assembly or the Senate, of property which should have been disclosed in a statement of registrable interests, the magistrate shall order the member to make full disclosure of the property within a specified period.

    Where a member of the House of Assembly or the Senate fails to comply with an order made pursuant to subsection (2) within the specified period, the offense referred to in subsection (1) shall be deemed to be a continuing offence and the member shall be liable to a further fine of $3 000 for each day on which the offence continues.

    @ Piece, Ultimately,but the provisions referred to above must first be applied…

    Like

  • Corruption by politicians should carry severe penalties because thousands of taxpayers are hurt by the criminal actions of people who were elected with the expectation of “honesty”.

    Any politician convicted of corruption should never be allowed in government again.

    Like

  • @ the Luminary Jeff Cumberbatch

    Thank you very much for the clarification, I try to make sure I understand what is being said at all times.

    I’d Like to suggest something to you for your active consideration.

    The InterAmerican Development Bank and the UN Human Rights Commission are two agencies that are super committed to Good Governance.

    I should like to suggest that you, in your substantive role as Dean at the Cave Hill Faculty might be disposed to make an outreach to either or both to advance a series of Citizen Sensitization Instructional Tools that speak to these and similar issues across the entire Caribbean Region, COMMENCING WITH THE 3 UWI campuses first.

    De Ole Man is thinking along these lines kind sir of a focused series which

    Article 1 Right to Equality
    Article 2 Freedom from Discrimination
    Article 3 Right to Life, Liberty, Personal Security
    Article 4 Freedom from Slavery
    Article 5 Freedom from Torture and Degrading Treatment

    and possibly moving into the whole issue of Rights Guaranteed by a Constitution THAT IS NOT CHANGED ON A WILLY NILLY BASIS JUST TO BRING BACK 3 SENATORS.

    The fact of this matter oh Luminary is that BARRING YOUR VOICE IN THIS WILDERNESS, there is NO OTHER PUBLIC FIGURE with the balls and the principles to open their mouth and say a pang about anything that will be construed as CONTRA MUGABE or the slow dimunition of our Constitutional Rights.

    Sir Hilary has sold out, Come Sing a Song has sold out, Senator Caswell is well….

    Only you remain….

    The fact is that the SOL sellout was thwarted by your intervention alone WHILE YOU WERE AT THE FTC cause de ole man sure that Sandra “the Samsung Lover” while securing a family plan for the rest of the Family, would have caved into the pressure, as she has for the Telecommunications giants over the years, given her lack of vertebrae (I hope i spelt that properly cause Dr. GP going lik me up otherwise)

    The UWI needs to make new outreaches to its constituents that show its pertinence and proactivity to the average man and woman on the street.

    De ole man would love to tell me grandson that there is a project to facilitate that outreach and sensitization of Bajans and regional denizens.

    Like

  • @ Brother Hants

    A brilliant observation.

    Let me suppose that I were Ninjaman and on one given day I went down broad street and stole $5 from five tourists each de ole man would ask you this question

    “how many charges would the Indolent Commissioner of Police arrest me for?

    And, by extension, the equally impotent Director of Public Prosecutions how many charges would she bing against me?

    Would it be that because i effected all of the thefts in one day, I would be charges ONCE for all five crimes OR I WOULD BE CHARGED 5 times?

    These politicians have stolen $$ from every single tax payer in Barbados YET INCREDULOUSLY not one of them has been charged BECUASE MIA CARES!!

    Furthermore, here you have the representative of the highest office in the cuntry, barring the GG, being cuagt teifing AND MIA MUGABE MOTTLEY PASSSING A LAW THAT SAYS, “after 5 years we accord you a forgiveness of sins, and you can run again for parliament to teif again!!”

    Yes sir that makes sense to me.

    Brother Hants DO YOU THINK THAT 80% of the sheeple that voted for Mia Mao Mugabe give a badword about that sentencing fiasco?

    Like

Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s