← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Pachamama

It should be pellucid by now that barring a tectonic disclosure or other intervention Hillary Rodham Clinton (HRC) will win the USA presidential elections. However, she will immediately come under a massive series of investigations aimed at giving the defeated Republicans, provided they can retain the House of Representatives, a raison detre. Her presidency will provide the conditions for the RNC not to lose its status as a national party, as the legacy of Trumpism has placed it in grave danger so to.

In this piece we will rely, heavily, on the works of Charles Ortel. Ortel is best known for his analytical work, as a citizen, which brought down General Electric (GE) for doctoring financial results; Dadi Cheri a Haitian journalist of newsjunki.org and Utrice Lead, a Trinidadian-American from the Progressive Radio Network (PRN).

For over 20 years a basket of public foundations run by Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and Chelsea Clinton have served as entities for the illegal raising, laundering, commingling and mishandling of over 100 billion dollars. Much of this money coming from dictators and other characters presumably in exchange for favours, quid pro quo, pay to play schemes. The majority from average citizens around the world.

Readers unaware should know that there are very strict rules governing the operations of public charities in the world, even if there is an absence of formal global regulation. Public foundations are required by law to appoint independent trustees; cross-file financial statements with multiple jurisdictions; must be registered variously, should they want to operate in dozens of countries or states like the Clintons; money raised from the public must be deployed specifically for the reason stated. And the foundation’s public filings must so show, amongst others.

These laws are some of the strictest in the world. The legal infrastructure is excessively onerous in order to avoid oodles of tax free money going into the hands of disreputable actors. Money collected from unsuspecting publics, serving as a honey pot for the world’s leading charity fraud criminals.

In the case of the Clinton Foundation/s, an entity purportedly started to build and run a presidential library it has now morphed into a massive trans-national organization, operating tax free internationally and as the source of billions of dollars which we will contend has been an incubator for ‘high crimes and misdemeanour’ by HRC.

In addition to the spider web of entities controlled by the Clintons there is a wider level of intrigue. The Clintons have a cartel of alliances with other private/public foundations; drug companies manufacturing and selling vaccines and pharmaceutical of poor quality, the Red Cross, the UN which appointed Bill Clinton as ambassador to Haiti thereby immunizing him from prosecution there; access to governments around the world with a Clinton State Department as hammer, Bill as anvil, to force deals through for their personal interests.

This scheme is trans-presidential. The Bushes aided and abetted the Clintons and now the Obamas are waiting in the wing to cash in on the action. If it determined that both parties are too compromised all bets are off. No investigations in the House of Representatives. No trial of HRC in the Senate.

The preliminary procedures are already in the system. Marsha Blackburn, the representative from the 7th congressional district of Tennessee in the House of Representatives has already started a probe. Eric Schneidermann, the AG of New York, a Clinton acolyte, has already brought a case in which a Clinton Foundation founding personage and Virginia governor, Terry McAuliffe, has been made to appear.

After the 2010 Haiti earthquake the international community, ordinary people like us, donated 14.3 billion for reconstruction. With the help of the UN, the Clinton Foundation was given total control of these monies. Six years later only 2% of the money has been made available to the Haitian people and government. There are fears that this foundation money is being used in HRC’s presidential campaign.

In Haiti the Clintons are known to have more power that the government and while there are many rumours about where the reconstruction money is, or went, little has changed on the ground, unbelievable!

This is the kind of insidious relationships the Clintons have long had with Haiti. It was Bill Clinton who ran Aristide out of Haiti in the early 1990’s.

This same Bill Clinton forced the Haitian people to stop planting rice and forced them to import it from Arkansas, a state for which he is a former governor. The brother of HRC was able to secure rights to all of Haiti’s gold resources. Nothing could happen in Haiti unless the Clintons agreed.

This is how it has been even before there was a Black man in the White House. Obama, himself, aided the Clintons with massive capital accumulation. These are people who in 2000 were broke and now there are said to have personal wealth in the hundreds of millions while controlling billions in Clinton Foundations funds. The election of HCA could serve to further consolidate this position and offer a degree of immunization for all previous crimes, they hope.

Unless, somebody has cause to walk into the White House and say ‘Madam President there is a cancer on the Presidency”. The Clintons are betting that these crimes can be gotten away with, we doubt. They aim is to enrich themselves under the protection of law and hand billion to a single child, Chelsea Clinton and her heirs.

In the publicly available information on the Clinton Foundations we see highly questionable transfers between and amongst entities. The Clinton Foundations making transfers between themselves and other private foundations making transfers to the Clintons and vice versa. These to us, appear to be attempts at misleading the IRS and creating opportunities for diversion. They seem to be false transactions bordering on the extremes of illegality.

We are uncertain whether the American imperium is able to digest another impeachment. Absent that determination, we judge that there is an abundance of evidence, not proof, that serious breaches of charity law, exceeding the level for which Bill Clinton and Richard ‘Dick’ Nixon were impeached. In these circumstances, many people will be going to jail as Trump suggests but we hardly think Hillary Rodham Clinton will be on that list.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

719 responses to “HRC Will Win – But Has to Fight to Avoid Impeachment”


  1. Your hypothesis regarding impeachment of Hillary Clinton should she assumes the office of the presidency, falls flat on its face when placed under the barometer of historical precedent. Because as you have mentioned above, only two presidents have been impeached, but what you have failed to note is the fact that neither of them had been removed from office, so Hillary will be fine even if she does get impeached.

  2. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    ” It was Bill Clinton who ran Aristide out of Haiti in the early 1990’s.”

    Actually it was the Bush Administration kidnapped Aristide and put him on a plane to exile in South Africa in 2004 for 7 years, when he thought he was being taken to the US.., there is no doubt it was a conspiracy, all the oil, gold and iridium in Haiti and their plans for what is not theirs caused that coup, the greedy are just waiting to ponce like vultures leaving the Haitian people in poverty for hundreds more years. They make plans but the Divine makes decisions.

    That oil in Haiti will choke the greedy Clintons, just look at both of them.


  3. Retired US Army colonel Lawrence Wilkerson served as Chief of Staff to Colin Powell when Powell was Secretary of State in the George Bush administration. He assisted in drafting the infamous 2003 speech Powell gave at the UN Security Council in which Powell declared that the US and its allies had solid and incontrovertible evidence that Saddam was hiding WMDs in Iraq.

    Col. Lawrence is now singing a very different tune and has apologized for his role in preparing the Powell speech which he says used flawed and carefully selected and filtered evidence to present a false representation of the known facts surrounding Saddam’s alleged WMD program thereby propelling forward the US invasion and consequent destabilization of Iraq. In the interview below Wilkerson concludes with the thought that it might very well take a revolution by the people to clean out the corruption that permeates the US government and the military-industrial complex at the very highest levels.


  4. Lewy Bodies‎


  5. Pachaman

    For over 20 years a basket of public foundations run by Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and Chelsea Clinton have served as entities for the illegal raising, laundering, commingling and mishandling of over 100 billion dollars. Much of this money coming from dictators and other characters presumably in exchange for favours, quid pro quo, pay to play schemes. The majority from average citizens around the world.

    balderdash

    bring the facts and evidence not political Republican propaganda ,After twenty years and nothing of substance to back up all that you have said, a republican congress would not have let her become secretary of state if they had the evidence to prove all the corruption that the republican lackeys feed the american public.
    Very interesting that you would want to see clinton impeached is it because you and Putin are on the same page when it comes to the american election. hoping that a trump win would open the not so easy space that america denies Russia
    Putin is a shameless dog so much so that he has inserted his face into the american election by covert action to influence a trump win which will not happen

  6. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    ACs…, do yall fools live in the real world at any time, imknow you live on la-la island, but ya really taking stupidity too far now.


  7. Nixon was impeached? Must have missed that news flash

    Where is the proof that these allegations are evidence of “High crimes and Misdemeanors” required for impeachment?

  8. Violet C Beckles Avatar
    Violet C Beckles

    AC needs to be drug tested


  9. De ole man does not think much will come of the Impeachment efforts.

    Having said that Pachamama this is where the Republicans should have run the campaign against HRC as opposed to the Willie Lewinsky shennigans.

    Understanding the mind of the american public is a fickle thing easily swayed and the pictures of we niggers in such abject poverty would have been enough to sway the public sentiment.

    It is too late to do anything.

    The second nail in the Representatives coffin lies in them not all abandoning The Donald on this Pokkerts thing.

    The DEMs if they are wise should leverage that for all that it is worth to say that the Representative knew that the Donald was a pokkerts grabbing man and they were complicit to have supported him.

    As you can see Ryan has seen the writing on the wall and has abandoned him, it is every man for himself now.

    She will serve 4 years and then her term will be over and new faces will come.

    Barring War


  10. Trump running all over america spreading propaganda about “a rigged ” election having no proof most likely he is trying to feed that propaganda to his Prussian allied Putin . As for high crimes and misdemeanors Trump should be locked up . He is now known as the First presidential candidate that has violated the trust of the USA democracy tantamount to treason


  11. @ AC

    You so love your politicians

    If we were politicians we would want no other supporters. buy you! LOL


  12. but you


  13. Well Well

    you are wrong – 1996 he went to CAR and South Africa in exile


  14. “GreenMonkey October 19, 2016 at 6:50 PM #

    Retired US Army colonel Lawrence Wilkerson served as Chief of Staff to Colin Powell when Powell was Secretary of State in the George Bush administration. He assisted in drafting the infamous 2003 speech Powell gave at the UN Security Council in which Powell declared that the US and its allies had solid and incontrovertible evidence that Saddam was hiding WMDs in Iraq”

    Transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike

    CLINTON: Good evening.

    Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.

    Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.

    Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.

    I want to explain why I have decided, with the unanimous recommendation of my national security team, to use force in Iraq; why we have acted now; and what we aim to accomplish.

    Six weeks ago, Saddam Hussein announced that he would no longer cooperate with the United Nations weapons inspectors called UNSCOM. They are highly professional experts from dozens of countries. Their job is to oversee the elimination of Iraq’s capability to retain, create and use weapons of mass destruction, and to verify that Iraq does not attempt to rebuild that capability.

    The inspectors undertook this mission first 7.5 years ago at the end of the Gulf War when Iraq agreed to declare and destroy its arsenal as a condition of the ceasefire.

    The international community had good reason to set this requirement. Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq.

    The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again.

    The United States has patiently worked to preserve UNSCOM as Iraq has sought to avoid its obligation to cooperate with the inspectors. On occasion, we’ve had to threaten military force, and Saddam has backed down.

    Faced with Saddam’s latest act of defiance in late October, we built intensive diplomatic pressure on Iraq backed by overwhelming military force in the region. The UN Security Council voted 15 to zero to condemn Saddam’s actions and to demand that he immediately come into compliance.

    Eight Arab nations — Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, United Arab Emirates and Oman — warned that Iraq alone would bear responsibility for the consequences of defying the UN.

    When Saddam still failed to comply, we prepared to act militarily. It was only then at the last possible moment that Iraq backed down. It pledged to the UN that it had made, and I quote, a clear and unconditional decision to resume cooperation with the weapons inspectors.

    I decided then to call off the attack with our airplanes already in the air because Saddam had given in to our demands. I concluded then that the right thing to do was to use restraint and give Saddam one last chance to prove his willingness to cooperate.

    I made it very clear at that time what unconditional cooperation meant, based on existing UN resolutions and Iraq’s own commitments. And along with Prime Minister Blair of Great Britain, I made it equally clear that if Saddam failed to cooperate fully, we would be prepared to act without delay, diplomacy or warning.

    Now over the past three weeks, the UN weapons inspectors have carried out their plan for testing Iraq’s cooperation. The testing period ended this weekend, and last night, UNSCOM’s chairman, Richard Butler, reported the results to UN Secretary-General Annan.

    The conclusions are stark, sobering and profoundly disturbing.

    In four out of the five categories set forth, Iraq has failed to cooperate. Indeed, it actually has placed new restrictions on the inspectors. Here are some of the particulars.

    Iraq repeatedly blocked UNSCOM from inspecting suspect sites. For example, it shut off access to the headquarters of its ruling party and said it will deny access to the party’s other offices, even though UN resolutions make no exception for them and UNSCOM has inspected them in the past.

    Iraq repeatedly restricted UNSCOM’s ability to obtain necessary evidence. For example, Iraq obstructed UNSCOM’s effort to photograph bombs related to its chemical weapons program.

    It tried to stop an UNSCOM biological weapons team from videotaping a site and photocopying documents and prevented Iraqi personnel from answering UNSCOM’s questions.

    Prior to the inspection of another site, Iraq actually emptied out the building, removing not just documents but even the furniture and the equipment.

    Iraq has failed to turn over virtually all the documents requested by the inspectors. Indeed, we know that Iraq ordered the destruction of weapons-related documents in anticipation of an UNSCOM inspection.

    So Iraq has abused its final chance.

    As the UNSCOM reports concludes, and again I quote, “Iraq’s conduct ensured that no progress was able to be made in the fields of disarmament.

    “In light of this experience, and in the absence of full cooperation by Iraq, it must regrettably be recorded again that the commission is not able to conduct the work mandated to it by the Security Council with respect to Iraq’s prohibited weapons program.”

    In short, the inspectors are saying that even if they could stay in Iraq, their work would be a sham.

    Saddam’s deception has defeated their effectiveness. Instead of the inspectors disarming Saddam, Saddam has disarmed the inspectors.

    This situation presents a clear and present danger to the stability of the Persian Gulf and the safety of people everywhere. The international community gave Saddam one last chance to resume cooperation with the weapons inspectors. Saddam has failed to seize the chance.

    And so we had to act and act now.

    Let me explain why.

    First, without a strong inspection system, Iraq would be free to retain and begin to rebuild its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs in months, not years.

    Second, if Saddam can crippled the weapons inspection system and get away with it, he would conclude that the international community — led by the United States — has simply lost its will. He will surmise that he has free rein to rebuild his arsenal of destruction, and someday — make no mistake — he will use it again as he has in the past.

    Third, in halting our air strikes in November, I gave Saddam a chance, not a license. If we turn our backs on his defiance, the credibility of U.S. power as a check against Saddam will be destroyed. We will not only have allowed Saddam to shatter the inspection system that controls his weapons of mass destruction program; we also will have fatally undercut the fear of force that stops Saddam from acting to gain domination in the region.

    That is why, on the unanimous recommendation of my national security team — including the vice president, the secretary of defense, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, the secretary of state and the national security adviser — I have ordered a strong, sustained series of air strikes against Iraq.

    They are designed to degrade Saddam’s capacity to develop and deliver weapons of mass destruction, and to degrade his ability to threaten his neighbors.

    At the same time, we are delivering a powerful message to Saddam. If you act recklessly, you will pay a heavy price. We acted today because, in the judgment of my military advisers, a swift response would provide the most surprise and the least opportunity for Saddam to prepare.

    If we had delayed for even a matter of days from Chairman Butler’s report, we would have given Saddam more time to disperse his forces and protect his weapons.

    Also, the Muslim holy month of Ramadan begins this weekend. For us to initiate military action during Ramadan would be profoundly offensive to the Muslim world and, therefore, would damage our relations with Arab countries and the progress we have made in the Middle East.

    That is something we wanted very much to avoid without giving Iraq’s a month’s head start to prepare for potential action against it.

    Finally, our allies, including Prime Minister Tony Blair of Great Britain, concurred that now is the time to strike. I hope Saddam will come into cooperation with the inspection system now and comply with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions. But we have to be prepared that he will not, and we must deal with the very real danger he poses.

    So we will pursue a long-term strategy to contain Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction and work toward the day when Iraq has a government worthy of its people.

    First, we must be prepared to use force again if Saddam takes threatening actions, such as trying to reconstitute his weapons of mass destruction or their delivery systems, threatening his neighbors, challenging allied aircraft over Iraq or moving against his own Kurdish citizens.

    The credible threat to use force, and when necessary, the actual use of force, is the surest way to contain Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction program, curtail his aggression and prevent another Gulf War.

    Second, so long as Iraq remains out of compliance, we will work with the international community to maintain and enforce economic sanctions. Sanctions have cost Saddam more than $120 billion — resources that would have been used to rebuild his military. The sanctions system allows Iraq to sell oil for food, for medicine, for other humanitarian supplies for the Iraqi people.

    We have no quarrel with them. But without the sanctions, we would see the oil-for-food program become oil-for-tanks, resulting in a greater threat to Iraq’s neighbors and less food for its people.

    The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world.

    The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government — a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people. Bringing change in Baghdad will take time and effort. We will strengthen our engagement with the full range of Iraqi opposition forces and work with them effectively and prudently.

    The decision to use force is never cost-free. Whenever American forces are placed in harm’s way, we risk the loss of life. And while our strikes are focused on Iraq’s military capabilities, there will be unintended Iraqi casualties.

    Indeed, in the past, Saddam has intentionally placed Iraqi civilians in harm’s way in a cynical bid to sway international opinion.

    We must be prepared for these realities. At the same time, Saddam should have absolutely no doubt if he lashes out at his neighbors, we will respond forcefully.

    Heavy as they are, the costs of action must be weighed against the price of inaction. If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors. He will make war on his own people.

    And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them.

    Because we’re acting today, it is less likely that we will face these dangers in the future.

    Let me close by addressing one other issue. Saddam Hussein and the other enemies of peace may have thought that the serious debate currently before the House of Representatives would distract Americans or weaken our resolve to face him down.

    But once more, the United States has proven that although we are never eager to use force, when we must act in America’s vital interests, we will do so.

    In the century we’re leaving, America has often made the difference between chaos and
    community, fear and hope. Now, in the new century, we’ll have a remarkable opportunity to shape a future more peaceful than the past, but only if we stand strong against the enemies of peace.

    Tonight, the United States is doing just that. May God bless and protect the brave men and women who are carrying out this vital mission and their families. And may God bless America.

    Sorry for cutting and pasting but truth must be told- if Colin Powell lied, the above from the horses mouth indicates that so did Mr Clinton. Mr Bush and Mr Powell only completed what President Clinton started; yet for some reason we prefer to ignore the truth and bray like sheep.


  15. pachaman

    @
    Ac

    You so love your politicians

    //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

    hope not the way you love Putin

  16. Anonymouse - The Gazer Avatar
    Anonymouse – The Gazer

    [[MB]]
    mismatched
    too limited
    she mopped the floor with him
    Now bring on the spin doctors to tell me he won
    Almost as if she grab his balls and had him tiptoeing


  17. Trump in his usual style bombastic and brawling No substance on foreign policy he failed miserably.


  18. Embarrassing to hear him try to defend Putin saying he does not know Putin after having said previously he met Putin once,,,,, and calling Clinton a nasty woman.


  19. Two things to note.

    Hillary’s eyes and the rapid REM and many of you missed *****

    But once again wunna doan look at these things but I am a Secret Service man who watches these nuances.

    I will not share here cause wunna does look at these things and den de Republicans, Money Brain and Dr. GP run with it and then it goes out there to the USA heheheheheheh


  20. I missed the debate tonight because I had to finish some pressing work at the office.

    Can you guys tell me who won? I don’t have any faith in AC’s judgment.


  21. I tend to believe that Hilary did id one can say that she was able to hang with the much more thorough questions of the moderator.

    He grilled both of them good.

    He held no brief for HRC.

    Trump was doing OK in the first 25 minutes and then he faltered as only he can.

    I can see the strategy panning out.

    He is destroying the Republican party and their foothold across all the organs of government not just the white house.

    There were two things that happened during the encounter but I am going to wait and see if Dr. GP (or anyone else picked up both of them)

    Trump does not listen to his strategists but, in addition to that trait, he is a shallow man who is incapable of any deep reserves or in depth analytical skills and it shows in these debates

    He has to be a plant, there is no way that Hilary would have survived if pence was on that stage, NO WAY!!

  22. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    http://ow.ly/HMWa305m6bj

    Pacha…if you have another earlier date for Aristide’s exile, please share, I only know of the most recent one in 2004 as shown above, cant find the 1996 date..

  23. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    http://ow.ly/5gL1305m6t1

    More info on the years Aristide was president of Haiti.


  24. We live in an Upside Down World:

    Hillary has a long record as a radical feminist who sleeps with women and abuses men — one of her male assistants committed suicide She punched her husband in the eye and pelted him with vases and other solid objects in the White House.

    But throughout the campaign the talk is about Trump being a ‘misogynist’ and ‘sexual predator’ because he likes to touch women up. If Trump was known to have punched his wife and thrown solid objects at her, the media would have never discussed anything else about him. But Hillary gets a pass.

    How can she be qualified for the Oval Office if she hates men, who are half the US population?


  25. Chad9999

    Your last statement is pure bullshit which leads me to believe that you’re a Trump supporter because in all honesty, in America we have what is called the leftwing and rightwing media, and you know if what you’re claiming was true, the rightwing media would be all over this story like a nigger hustling on de block.


  26. Chad9999

    Trump is indeed a misogynist as well as a sexual predator and the evidence is in support of this because let us face it: do you think that all those women who came forward an accused Trump are being exploited for political purpose? Come now, as the old adage goes: “A hundred French soldiers can’t be wrong.”


  27. What is scary listening to the presidential debates is how both candidates have promised to destroy ISIL, destroy these bad hombres Trump says. At no time do they demonstrate that they are fighting an ideology.


  28. @AC

    Only the people like you operate in the realm of emotionalism. Love, hate etc

    We try to operate based of reason, not emotion.

    We are more analysts of world events than targets for political propaganda

    Please, go and see some of these places

    Talk to real people on the grounds

    Grow yourself

    Reject everything you hear and see from officialdom, mainstream media, as a lie!

    LOL!

  29. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    Actually Mr Blogmaster I perceive that what is truly scary is that these media inspired public spectacles are still called ‘debates’. They are more like the old fashioned Roman gladiator events where folks salivated awaiting the death blow one opponent to the other or at least enjoyed the no-holds barred contest.

    These things have long past stopped being focused and civil entreaties of the candidates policies offered in studious, funny and engaging ways to enlighten a thinking populace.

    Clinton never ‘debated’ that ISIL point because that is not what the frenzied desire. Why is that even a ‘question’. The terror threat is not a war that can be ended with a Versailles accord. There will be no surrender followed by peach accords. This is an endless war that will have other 9-11 moments just as it will have other video-game tinged ‘extreme prejudice’ assassination of terror leaders like in that Pakistan safe-house.

    It is laughable and ‘disgusting’ frankly if one were a Seal or even standard military to hear Clinton compare and contrast her ‘experience’ to that of Trump with the quip that she was in the ‘situation room’ hunting Bin Laden when he was hosting his TV show. She was comfortably sitting watching a show also. I really don’t see how that makes her more formidable than anyone else.

    Of course Trump can only say ‘believe me’ that ISIL will be destroyed. He is even more clueless about these matters despite having one of the most experienced Generals on terror related matters as his griot.

    These are the ultimate reality shows. Two minutes to pronounce on complex and complicated affairs of an economic tax plan or strategies against a metastasizing sickness called terrorism and more.

    Do we really still expect debates or rather the best sound bites landed as resounding body blows to muted cheers from the audience….an audience btw which is supposed to be as quiet as church mice. Really! Why have them at all if they can’t enjoy their Colosseum moments.

    This entire process is frigging scary and ‘rigged’. Trump is right about that but absolutely not in the way he projects. He is part of a rigged spectacle reality event as he has never once throughout this campaign DEBATED !

  30. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    http://ow.ly/EOzz305mzrN

    Lol…the idjits in the Barbados parliament should learn from this, but can they, when you do not take responsibilty for your own actions, you are a FAILURE.

    http://ow.ly/lE8v305mzHo

    Unhinged TV…lol, hahaha, lol..can’t make any of this up..lol


  31. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton is more qualified to be President. The wanne be politician Donald Trump has shown through out debates he has nothing to offer the american public outside his ongoing efforts to attack Clinton and the Obama administration
    His bombastic and know it all attitude is sufficient to make any right thinking voter to baulk at his responses on foreign policy .
    His repetition to take a question and alligned them to Clinton emails or any other policies Or programs that Clinton has been involved is profound evidence that he is clueless and not well prepared to handle the office of Presidency
    After being told that there was hardened evidence that Russia was engaging in sabatoge by way of trying to influence the american election and he should denounce Russian govt actions he refuses to do so and remains stubborn using his talking points to avoid the issue with rhetorical attacks on Clinton
    This was his last debate and one thing for sure his fiery campagain got the attention of many voters but in the end fizzled all the way going into the final round now having to deal with a combination of hurting his brand his political asperations and the Republican party


  32. “America has lost now,” Duterte told Chinese and Philippine business people at a forum in the Great Hall of the People, attended by Chinese Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli.

    “I’ve realigned myself in your ideological flow and maybe I will also go to Russia to talk to (President Vladimir) Putin and tell him that there are three of us against the world – China, Philippines and Russia. It’s the only way,” he added.

    “With that, in this venue, your honors, in this venue, I announce my separation from the United States,” Duterte said to applause. “I have separated from them. So I will be dependent on you for all time. But do not worry. We will also help as you help us.”

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/duterte-says-us-has-lost-aligns-philippines-with-china/ar-AAjaEvu?li=BBnb7Kz

    This man Duerte has been largely ‘misunderstood’ in the West. LOL

    He has just delivered a blow of monumental proportions to the Americans

    Caricatured as a ‘madman’ in the West. He seems to be as mad as a fox

    This is after the Americans moved heaven and earth to get an international court ruling over the Phillipines v China, over the South Asian Sea.

    This is a hammer to Yankee imperialism.

    He might very well be a madman we love to hate! LOL


  33. South China Sea


  34. America has lost now huum! I won’t go spreading such propaganda because even the Chinese and the Russians are quick to admit that America is not to be counted out because of the American know it how and can do spirit -which and will continue to sustain this Republic despite the moral decline and economic and political vicissitudes.


  35. @David

    This is Robert Fisk, preeminent ME journalist

    The Real Purpose Behind the “Liberation” of Mosul?

    When Mosul falls, Isis will flee to the safety of Syria. But what then?

    The entire Isis caliphate army could be directed against the Assad government and its allies – a scenario which might cause some satisfaction in Washington

    By Robert Fisk

    October 18, 2016 “Information Clearing House” – “The Independent”- Syria’s army and Hezbollah and Iranian allies are preparing for a massive invasion by thousands of Isis fighters who will be driven out of Iraq when Mosul falls. The real purpose behind the much-trumpeted US-planned “liberation” of the Iraqi city, the Syrian military suspect, is to swamp Syria with the hordes of Isis fighters who will flee their Iraqi capital in favour of their “mini-capital” of Raqqa inside Syria itself.

    For weeks now, Western media and the American experts it likes to quote have been predicting a Stalingrad-style battle to the death by Isis inside Mosul – or a swift victory over Isis followed by inter-sectarian Iraqi battles for the city. The UN is warning of massive refugee columns streaming from a besieged city. But the Syrians – after witnessing the sudden collapse and evacuation of Palmyra when their own army retook the ancient Syrian city earlier this year – suspect that Isis will simply abandon Mosul and try to reach safety in the areas of Syria which it still controls.

    Already, Syrian army intelligence has heard disturbing reports of a demand by Isis in towns and villages south of Hasaka – a Syrian city held by regime forces and Kurds in the north of the country – for new electricity and water supplies to be installed for an influx of Isis fighters from Mosul. In other words, if Mosul falls, the entire Isis caliphate army could be directed against the Assad government and its allies – a scenario which might cause some satisfaction in Washington. When the Iraqi city of Fallujah fell to Iraqi army and militia forces earlier this year, many Isis fighters fled at once to Syria…………………………………………………………………

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45702.htm


  36. While Putin is trying to win a no win war in the middle east. America took away one if its friendliest allies in North america Cuba right from under his nose. Putin desire to make america fail in their foreign policies would not help Russia as Russia is deep in debt and unable to help itself so whatever political gains Russia might achieved in wars would be quickly lost as the economics of fighting wars against the long term financial reality of helping those war torn nations that Russia is helping


  37. The agenda of the US is still regime change in Syria.

    Don’t let the fog of war blind to the lies of war .


  38. The chickens are coming home to roost; Trump’s message that the Election is rigged is a manifestation of the rhetoric that has been coming from the GOP for the last two decades or more as the makeup of the ethnic composition of the electorate is changing to disadvantage the Republicans. The GOP controlled legislators in many States have introduced legislation with various ID requirements to limit the electoral turn out of African American voters because “nudge,nudge, wink,wink” those black people vote multiple times and engage in electoral fraud. Trump has been encouraging his supporters to visit African American precincts to ensure that the voters are legitimate, notably he is not advising them to visit their own polling stations to check for the same. The issue is that States control the voting process and many US States are run by GOP Governors and GOP politicians who have to certify the votes. His positioning on this matter have placed them in the untenable position of defending the integrity of their State’s Electoral system, they are now realizing that you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

    Trump’s Cri de couer is part of his sense of entitlement like the boy who owns the only cricket bat and brings it to the game but when he is bowled he complains “yuh teef me out I am teking my bat and gwine home”.

    The voters will see him to his home in Trump Tower in Nov.2016.


  39. “With that, in this venue, your honors, in this venue, I announce my separation from the United States,” Duterte said to applause. “I have separated from them. So I will be dependent on you for all time. But do not worry. We will also help as you help us.”
    +++++++++++
    English translation (not Tagalog) :

    Meet the new boss same as the old boss


  40. Trump talks about illegal immigration and bringing back jobs to the USA .However what Trump fails to understand that his policy can lead to destabilsation of small nation economics fueled by high unemployment and a resurgence of a flood of illegal immigrants into the America looking for jobs
    Nafta was an effective “wall” wherby help to small nations was easily accessible helping small nation economies to create growth decrease unemployment and decrease the flow of illegal immigrants looking in the Usa
    Some of these objectives have been met with sucess as small nations working hand in hand with foreign govts and foreign investors have benefited somewhat from all of Nafta initiatives


  41. Imagine it were Obama instead of Clinton and he had refused to shake hands with Republican counterpart.


  42. Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right – INRI October 19, 2016 at 11:11 PM #
    Two things to note.

    Hillary’s eyes and the rapid REM and many of you missed *****

    THAT IS NOT REM THAT IS NYSTAGMUS A FEATURE OF LEWYS ALSO PARKINSON’S


  43. @ GP

    Something we can agree on

    ‘Think Bill also shows some signs of Parkinson’s type diseases as well

    They’ll be a death in this White House.


  44. Trump enjoying the theatre and I enjoying the greatest show on earth!!!!

    He hasn’t said he won’t accept the result, all he said was I will keep you in suspense.

    He is showing true principle …. having said what he has said about Hilary how can he suddenly say he will behave as if there is no garbage?

    … and it is not as if no candidate ever took issue with the results of the election!!

    Here is an example where the DEMs actually went to court to have the election result changed … and lost.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

    It doesn’t look as though the greatest show on earth will end very soon!!

    My gut is Trump will win!!


  45. …. and if he does, I am sure he will take no issue with the election !!!!

    HRC will be investigated and if found guilty will be locked up!!

    And so, life will go on!!


  46. Pachamama October 20, 2016 at 9:56 AM #
    @ GP

    Something we can agree on

    ‘Think Bill also shows some signs of Parkinson’s type diseases as well

    They’ll be a death in this White House.

    VERY SORRY SIR
    THERE IS NOTHING HERE THAT WE AGREE ON


  47. The press pushes the unfavourability ratings of both Clinton and Trump.

    Trump’s is higher than Clinton’s ergo, Clinton will win, the lesser of two evils!!

    My impression however is that there are different reasons why Clinton and Trump are viewed unfavourably.

    Clinton is known and despised.

    Trump is considered to be a raving lunatic!!


  48. John

    You kidding brother because it isn’t going to happen now nor will it happen in the distant future because some of the same people who will be charged to impeach her are culpable of some of the same irregularities.


  49. @ Dr. GP

    Undoubtedly there are some actions which are simply un-explainable.

    When you are interrogating someone I am told (heheheheheh) you watch the eyes.

    Trump is undoubtedly in a class of lying by himself but that shows that he is a pathological liar who lies naturally.

    But you have to watch their eyes and you will see the tell tale signs, like a out of sync metronome.

    You are watching very closely.

    What confirmed it for me was not the 13 off sync eye movements at * hr:min:sec but three actions at (a) *** (b) *** and (c) *** which is a breach of such magnitude that it could only have been because ***

    They are using *** and *** to facilitate ***

    Remember this particular quotation of de ole man “AP = 8 shift 9, noted Pachamama”. De ole man like quatrains too lololol.

    I would watch for “disruptions” 9 to 10 days away from Nov 8th since it is obvious what is happening but den again de ole man is a Ludlum feller

    “7And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.

    8And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.”

    Revelation 11


  50. Piece

    Does your calculus includes how many people vote early, all like now so?

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading