← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by David A. Comissiong, President, Clement Payne Movement
Akanni McDowall (l) Toni Moore (r)
Akanni McDowall (l) Toni Moore (r)

Barbados – as we all know – is suffering from a dearth of national political leadership, and is currently in a state of crisis and great peril. But the good news is that we are beginning to see positive signs which suggest that the “fight-back” to save and restore Barbados has begun!

These recent positive and hopeful signs of a national “fight-back” consist of such phenomena as:-

  1. the new young leaders that have come to the fore in the National Union of Public Workers (NUPW) and the Barbados Workers Union (BWU), and the renewed spirit of courage and activism that the Trade Union Movement has begun to exhibit;
  2. the courageous and patriotic Budget reply speech that Opposition leader Mia Mottley recently delivered in the House of Assembly;
  3. the effort recently undertaken by such elder patriots as Sir Henry Forde, Ian Archer, Sir Woodville Marshall, Sir Stephen Emptage and Peter Laurie to propose and design a system of “People’s Initiatives” that would permit the citizens of Barbados to put forward proposals for new pieces of legislation and for changes to the Constitution;
  4. the new effort that is underway to bring together the forces of consciousness and progressive thought in Barbados to address many of the centuries-old problems of Barbadians of African Descent under the unifying banner of the recently proclaimed “United Nations International Decade For People of African Descent“;
  5. the initiatives that have been embarked upon by such notable citizens as Ras Simba, Hal Martin, Onkphra Wells, John Howell, David Denny and others to launch young Barbadians into independent business and artistic activity via such new formations as the African Heritage Foundation and the Pan-African Coalition of Organizations (PACO);
  6. the concerted effort that is now being made by this writer and other citizens such as Bobby Clarke and Muhamad Nassar to expose and put an end to the still existing old colonial practice of conferring outrageously privileged taxpayer-funded Government contracts on a clique of elite Barbadian business-people; and
  7. the admirable initiative undertaken by Messrs Andrew Bynoe and Patrick Frost to highlight and tackle the corrupt practice of “vote buying” that is now routinely engaged in by our Barbadian political class.

What makes these recent developments so encouraging is that they have emerged in a Barbados that has been through a virtually unrelieved ten year period of depression, disappointment and disenchantment, courtesy of a highly deficient and defective national political leadership.

If we go back to the last three years of Mr Owen Arthur’s 2004 to 2008 governmental administration, we will recall that we were saddled with a highly dysfunctional Government that deflated and depressed our nation.

But if we thought that the latter stage of Mr Arthur’s reign was bad, worse was to come with the Democratic Labour Party’s ascension to power in 2008! Under both late Prime Minister David Thompson and current Prime Minister Freundel Stuart our country has been saddled with a pathetic “do little” Government that has preached a message of national helplessness to the people of Barbados over the entire period that they have been in office.

For seven long years now all we have heard from this Democratic Labour Party administration is that our country is in the grip of an international recession and that there is virtually nothing that we, as a country, can do about it. And so, armed with this dispiriting and defeatist dogma, Prime Minister Stuart and his cabal of Ministers have been content to preside over a gradually sinking and decaying Barbados, with nary a word, idea or proposal of positive or inspiring endeavour being proferred by them to the nation.

Thus, for some ten long years now our deficient and dysfunctional political leaders have generated a miasma of “learned helplessness” that has settled over our nation and stifled it.

But the time has now come for us – the citizens of Barbados – to bestir ourselves and dispel that negative miasma!

I would therefore like, on behalf of the people of Barbados, to tell Prime Minister Stuart that the people of Barbados have never been a defeatist “do-nothing” people! Rather, our history has shown us that whenever the people of Barbados have been faced with calamity or crisis they have always been able to come to grips with the situation and to apply their energy, native ingenuity and creativity to overcome the crisis and move forward.

And so, the biggest problem we face in Barbados today is not any “international recession”, but rather, an uninspiring and unenterprising Governmental administration!

We Barbadians should therefore be encouraged by the recent signs of a renewed national spirit in the labour movement, in our Opposition Leader, in our community activists, and in patriotic elements within our civil society.

We – the citizens of Barbados – need to nurture this new found spirit, and find a way to get this dispiriting and dysfunctional Governmental administration off of our backs, and to put in place a new administration that is capable of inspiring the nation, unleashing the pent up energy of our civil society, and collaborating with both our Labour Movement and our business community.

This is the time for a new governmental administration that is capable of thinking and acting outside of the proverbial box– an administration that, for example, would appreciate the need, in a period of economic stagnation, for every Government Ministry to be mandated to identify and pursue at least one concrete developmental project that can add new economic value to our nation!

We must aim for a new development – focused Government that could rise to the challenge of collaborating and partnering with the private sector to ensure that all national assets that possess the potential to earn foreign exchange are developed and utilized to the fullest extent.

We must also aim for a new labour – respecting Governmental administration that could take the trade unions into their confidence, and genuinely consult and collaborate with the trade unions to sensibly restructure the public sector and the statutory corporations.

And what about the many ways in which a new labour oriented Governmental administration could empower and facilitate the credit unions, cooperatives, trade unions and other working-class and community based organizations to develop a new “People’s Sector” of the economy? Or to develop a national “Employee Share Ownership Programme” that would permit Barbadian workers to share in the ownership of the businesses that they work for and help to develop.

There are many, many ways in which Barbados could and should be moving forward! But before any of this can or will happen we must first throw off the dead weight that is holding us down.

Time to fight back and move forward Barbados!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

88 responses to “The Fight-Back Has Begun!”


  1. Glaringly missing from Comissiong’s perspective is the rise of social media. It can be ignored or trivialized by the traditional arm in civil society but as we have seen all over the world, it is a factor.


  2. Good article by Comissiong – apart from missing the Social media influence.
    Were he not know to waver “hither and thither” and to get carried away with shiite issues on a regular basis, they could have been a serious role for him to play in a “fight back”.

    But what fight back what??!!

    A minority of Bajans have been FORCED to see the light because social media has lifted the veil of ignorance that the Nation and Advocate held over our eyes for decades. (as they were designed to do). But the vast majority of us continue to be such dense and myopic brass bowls, that as long as there is a rum shop to sit in front of and play dominoes; as long as there is a political pimp to come around occasionally to buy a rum; as long as there is a stupid mother at home to provide free meals; the only shiite they will fight for is a longer kadooment and another soca or some shiite on Farley Hill.

    Dog dead.


  3. @Bush Tea

    Why don’t you take your own advice and accept you will not be able to convince 100% of the audience. A movement or a shared perspective of some is all it takes to ignite and get the ball running.


  4. Oh well another barking Chihuahua seeking a pound of flesh and this too shall pass


  5. @ David
    if you are on a little boat where 80% of the passengers insist on leaning over to starboard….. boss no 20% movement away can bring stability. In fact, in a democratic boat, the captain will be elected by the 80% and the 20% ‘stabilisers’ will be marginalised and ignored.

    A ‘movement’ must be a majority, else it is just a nuisance.

    Wait AC, ..you don’t sleep?
    Conscience got yuh up all night or wuh? 🙂
    Ohhh wait! um gotta be insomnia…
    wunna don’t have nunna them nuh!!!


  6. Bush shit alias deputy dawg u so crazy wuh u up early too fool but then again dee Alzheimer’s must be kicking in .


  7. @Bush Tea

    Please train your enormous intellect on the issue at hand of you want to win over many.


  8. Morning gents.

    Substitute the individuals in this video with sectors/segments in society. Will the REAL leaders please stand up?

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s2FzpAFegXE?

  9. are-we-there-yet Avatar
    are-we-there-yet

    Observing;

    They’ve stood up and you and others have, while praising the current inept deadership, sought to portray them as young, wet behind the ears unionists, lumping them with the coopted union leadership that went before.

    The bravery and willingness to step out of the bought union leader mould of the new union leadership is the most important sign of a change that we have had in Barbados for the last decade or so.

    But you, with your vast intellect, can’t see it and join the entrenched band in seeking to denigrate them.

    Thanks for sight of the video!

  10. de Ingrunt Word Avatar
    de Ingrunt Word

    David, that is correct that “A movement or a shared perspective of some is all it takes…”.

    The relevance of social media is clear but Bushie is forgetting that the local newspapers were businesses started or owned by people who were aligned to those of the status quo.

    What else were they going to do but support the power brokers !

    Yet, of course over the years there have always been publications or groups or individuals (Clennell Wickham, Fly Sealy, to name two at different ends of the spectrum) who did their best to bring light to darkness and truth to those who wanted to see that light…there was always an alternative media or pathway (limited though it was) to the real news.

    Today the internet has provided the ultimate alternative media.

    So people will party – as social media makes that better too – even as thousands more are enlightened.

    You sir, are cut from a very similar mould as the Wickham’s of long ago days…a pathway for light.

    The younger Wickham may not be a fan (according to what I have read here) but coming from the family tree that he does, he should be!!


  11. @Observing and Dee Word

    And mistakes will be made!


  12. The young and brash turks broke all the rules applicable to good leadership rules guided by good commonsense and diplomacy but had prefer to act out than react with an interest which would be beneficial to All parties. There display a savy of clout built on political bedrock and interest to intimidate which left them staring like deer’s in the headlights.
    For all there efforts nothing was accomplished as they seek now seek the answers from the court while the country grapples with the political and environmental stench of garbage left on both highways


  13. @awty
    Man yuh lie! I didn’t pick and choose and denigrate only the young unionists. I criticise(d) ALL..especially the old farts that should have learnt over the years how to get the eggs they want without waking up the chickens!

    And the only praise I ever gave our current leadership was their ability to spot, exploit, and out maneuver naive, gullible and fractured trade union leadership. Were it me I would do the same.

    Now, I admit that the recent actions are a POSITIVE sign of SOME necessary change, BUT, we went around the mulberry bush, gave the bushman a high five and came back to town…yet, with regards to the REAL issues and the MOST pressing matters to ensure a sustained, collective and relevant trade union voice our “lone nuts” have seemingly withdrawn to their quiet hollowed halls.

    It takes balls to stand up and do a crazy dance in the sun bareback; it takes guts to keep do so by yourself without backup; it takes vision to keep doing and to keep going no matter who or what.

    The “young turks” have half of what’s needed to bring change. Let’s see if they commit to finding the other half.

    Just observing


  14. I dont see any fighting back though the article have some good points.I just see some people “brekkin fuh duh self” in fear of the inevitable.A loosely connected machination of interest groups.

  15. de Ingrunt Word Avatar
    de Ingrunt Word

    David, and mistakes are part of the learning process, although I am not convinced that this faux-pas by the unionists is grave in any way. As Observing symbolized above, they showed true gumption (male and female balls) to actually enforce the strike action – the crazy dance.

    The media conference appears to be an overzealous act but surely it should not have dismantled the decisions as the MoL and her acolytes was making it out to be; but of course her actions were also those of an overzealous negotiator seeking to regain lost ground.

    Well played on her part! McDowall has learned his lesson. He will not falter again like this, that’s clear.

    Listening to young McDowall it appears he has the vision to which Observer also alluded. One can only hope that he (and Ms. Moore) have the conviction, determination, intelligence and engineering skills (bridge building) to work through the rough course from peers, detractors, advisers et al towards that vision.

    We can only ask for rational and reasonable unionists for there is a time to march and strike just as there is a time for patience and cooperative action.

  16. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Here is a strike action that should teach the idiots in the DLP/BLP how unions are supposed to be respected at all cost. Live and learn.

    http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/70163/laguardia-jfk-airport-workers-strike-starting-wednesday

  17. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    AC……why don’t you go clean up the garbage on the highway, as a good citizen and yapping yardfowl…lol

  18. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    BTW….I don’t know where Dennis ‘were is my bribe’ Lowe and the DLP got their idea that workers should not be paid for striking; you do get paid in the real world, but obviously not in la-la island of Barbados. With jokers like Esther ‘do you know who i am; Byer, no one is surprised.


  19. Bushie is waiting to see if the Union (and sanitation workers, should the union lack the balls) will let thieving Lowe get away with that foolish statement about ‘not a cent’…..

    You have workers who can stop work for three days and cause a national emergency versus a government who, if they all died tomorrow, would only be missed when the smell force the same sanitation workers to dispose of their remains…

    NO CONTEST!

    …besides, how the hell do you pay the AX teachers who never seemed to work anyhow, and now talk shiite when it comes to sanitation workers standing up for RIGHT.


  20. Bushie
    Like you I waiting too.And I going further because these SSA guys will show Lowe the ball that shoot Nelson when they declare they en wukking as long as he in de cabinet.Den all hell gine break loose.The UM say he dey fun 5 years?.Awright den.I know the SSA dey fuh de long haul but I en sure bout the UM nor Lowe.

  21. St George's Dragon Avatar
    St George’s Dragon

    The strikers should not be paid for the days they didn’t work. They should be paid overtime for the extra time they work clearing up the mess.
    If the SSA does pay them for unworked days, perhaps they would like to pay me as well. I didn’t work for the SSA on the days of the strike either.


  22. Sanitation should be treated as an essential service and the workers should not be allowed to strike.

    They should also be paid and given benefits that reflect their true value.


  23. @Hants

    The island continues to look like mount stinkeroo.


  24. Deputy dawg alias bush shit there u go again spinning uh hypocritical wheels pretending u want the SSS workers to be paid after many years of calling the public workers shiftless!lazy!and unproductive scamps living off the taxpayersmoney l! Boy uh tell u one dirty low down scamp


  25. Sinckler singing a different song now about the Customs and I hear the UM singing a different tune in the 1pm news about the NUPW.Reason beginning to replace bullying and bluster.Let me say to all you against the paying of the SSA workers.Wunna kin sing the song’o jose,they will be paid,one way or the other.No ifs,ands or buts…its soonest.


  26. @ Dragon
    The strikers should not be paid for the days they didn’t work. They should be paid overtime for the extra time they work clearing up the mess.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Your attitude is understood and accepted. That attitude is in your genes…
    However, NORMAL people see things a bit differently.
    You see, it all revolves around WRONG and RIGHT.

    If Bushie should initiate actions that are illegal, and which cause YOU to take corrective measures that you would otherwise NOT have had to take….. Then Bushie (not being of your lineage) accepts responsibility AND liability for your expenses and pain and suffering.

    People who are in the habit of NOT doing RIGHT
    …because of what they think is their MIGHT
    …and who end up doing SHIITE
    …naturally would like to hold their VICTIMS responsible for the mess…
    …rather than see the link back to their nastiness.

    So wunna fellows who bend the rules of employment to wunna advantage like this shiite about making victims SUFFER for any actions that counteract wunna shiite.

    If the Union was/is proved to be wrong in their action, then Bushie will agree that the UNION should pay the cost.
    UNTIL SUCH TIME, the damn government should pay the workers…especially AFTER the BIDC have decided to ignore/ withdraw/ tear-up/ …or whatever they have done with the offending letters.
    ….and after the AX teachers PRECEDENT.

  27. St George's Dragon Avatar
    St George’s Dragon

    It is the individual’s right to strike and if they do they should understand the consequences. No-one forced them to strike. If they wanted to be paid, they should have worked and found other ways to complain.
    If you want to be really difficult, you could ask why should someone from the SSA should be able to strike about a dispute at BIDC. Some other countries would not allow that.


  28. “….you could ask why should someone from the SSA should be able to strike about a dispute at BIDC. Some other countries would not allow that.”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    True….
    Would never have been allowed in South Africa, the good old USA or Rhodesia.

    But there is a principle of STANDING UP FOR RIGHT, that rings with people who are marginalised and dispossessed….. You may have heard of it……SOLIDARITY….

    …but that ain’t got a thing to do with money so you don’t even try to get it….. 🙂

    But if it EVER really gets going, a lotta shiite bout here will get flushed….


  29. Bushie if a man comes and tell his co workers to strike won’t you first find out who will be paying them for those days they are striking? If you withhold your labour from your employer why would you want them to pay you for days not worked??? Didn’t you state on BU that workers who strike must be prepared to sacrifice something for their cause? Before anyone comes and ask people to strike the should state the conditions under which they are striking. Conditions like payment for the days while on strike. This is one time I will agree with the Government.


  30. @Well Well,and Bushie et al,

    A riddle a riddle a re, no one can solve this riddle but me.
    Tell me no stories and I’ll tell you no lies.

    There once was a man named Reagan who was an actor. One day Ron was elected President of the richest and most powerful country in the world. And many people and unions and so on were dissatisfied with the state of the country and the economy. And many people marched for better deals. And one day one of the most powerful and important unions called out its members on a strike. Now the Union to which the Air Traffic Controllers belonged felt that the members were so important and special that if they went on strike, air traffic would be severely impacted and they would get their desires.
    Can you tell me what Ron Did?


  31. Why did the government pay the BSTU teachers who strike in the Alexandra dispute?


  32. The political yard fowls can huff and puff all they want, the SSA workers will be paid. The SSA and Customs can easily bring the country to its knees in short order. They can make the grab to the short and curlies a very unpleasant experience. How can the minister suggest no payment, what about those who wanted to work?

    JA

  33. Frustrated Businessman Avatar
    Frustrated Businessman

    It is my long-held legal understanding that unions pay their members for days they are called out of work on strike, that’s what union dues are for. No striking worker should be paid by their employer but what complicates matters is when some strikers are daily-paid and some are salary (monthly) paid. Teachers are salary paid, I assume their strike days were handled as sick days or holidays.

  34. St George's Dragon Avatar
    St George’s Dragon

    “Why did the government pay the BSTU teachers who [went on] strike in the Alexandra dispute?”
    Good question – it shouldn’t have. Setting precedents for short-term gain is never a good idea.


  35. Barbados is just providing a feast for rats and flies.
    With a little rain mosquitoes will have new and improved breeding grounds. Could be good start to spreading disease.

    Clean up the factin garbage ashlows.


  36. Some people say lowe is a revvunt.The man has no charity nor respect for the SSA workers but in love bad with braff de techy fella.Up to now that sonofabitch en deny what MAM say about the big ride he getting from a deal.A stinkin’ affair dat lowfella.


  37. @David,
    You obviously did not solve my riddle. You know what Ron did?
    He fired ALL the Air Traffic Controllers. The strike was over before you could say RON. So if the workers at La Guardia to which Well Well referred choose to go on strike, the Airlines will institute contingency plans. It has always been known that Unions have strike funds to pay workers who decide to go on strike. When I was working and a member of OPSEU, we picketed and we were not even paid for the hours we walked the picket line. They are never paid by the employer. Why then should this government pay striking SSA workers. We here in Toronto have had many SSA workers going on strike; some times for weeks, and the workers are never paid by the government. Why would you folks wAT THE GOVERNMENT TO PAY, ESPECIALLY SINCE THERE IS NO INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE BETWEEN THE SSA WORKERS AND GOVERNMENT; THEY WALKED OUT IN SOLIDARITY WITH OTHER WORKERS. NO PAY BY GOVERNMENT!!

  38. Colonel Buggy Avatar

    islandgal246 July 22, 2015 at 3:01 PM #
    …………………………………………………………………………………….
    On the radio today, an NUPW spokesperson, claimed that some SSA workers had turned up for work and did not take any active part in the strike . These apparently are the ones that the NUPW are asking SSA to pay. Sounds fair to me.


  39. Alvin Cummins July 22, 2015 at 3:07 PM #

    “@Well Well, and Bushie et al, A riddle a riddle a re, no one can solve this riddle but me. Tell me no stories and I’ll tell you no lies”

    Cummins seems to referring to the USA air traffic controllers strike (ATC) organized by the Professional Air Traffic Controls Organisation (PATCO) in August 1981.

    On August 3, 1981, during a “question and answer session” with the press, Reagan responded by:

    A) informing Americans that the air traffic controllers violated an oath taken by each employee, “a sworn affidavit, when they accepted their jobs,” as follows:

    “I am not participating in any strike against the Government of the United States or any agency thereof, and I will not so participate while an employee of the Government of the United States or any agency thereof.”

    B) declaring the strike illegal under the Taft-Hartley Act, while giving the 13,000 striking air traffic controllers an ultimatum to return to work within 48 hours.

    On August 5, 1981, Reagan used the violation of the oath as his basis to fire over 11,000 workers who refused to return to work. PATCO was decertified as a union, while the former air traffic controllers were banned from holding federal jobs ever again.

    NOTE: The Taft–Hartley Act, formally Labor–Management Relations Act, enacted on June 23, 1947, was designed to restrict the activities and powers of labour unions.

    These are details that “DLP spin doctor” Guyson Mayers, Cummins et al are not telling Barbadians, but prefer to present HALF TRUTHS as a means of SCARE TACTICS.

    I must ask you a few questions, Cummins:

    1) Can you tell BU if a LAW similar to the “Taft-Harley Act” exists in Barbados?

    2) Can you inform BU if the SSA or any other worker from the public sector, (whether they are employed by central, statutory or quasi government entities), on acceptance of their job, THEY MADE AN OATH (sworn affidavit) that they would NOT PARTICIPATE IN ANY STRIKE ACTION AGAINST the government of Barbados?

    Different countries………. different scenarios. Then, WHAT EXACTLY IS YOUR POINT, Cummins?

    Seems as though I SOLVED THE RIDDLE, Cummins, and its solution clearly indicates that you are the one who is “telling lies.”


  40. Alvin Cummins July 22, 2015 at 4:00 PM #

    “You obviously did not solve my riddle. You know what Ron did? He fired ALL the Air Traffic Controllers.”

    WRONG AGAIN, Cummins.

    Reagan fired 11,000 of the 13,000 air traffic controllers.


  41. Alvin Cummins July 22, 2015 at 3:07 PM #

    “And many people and unions and so on were dissatisfied with the state of the country and the economy.”

    The reason why PATCO declared the strike on August 3, 1981, was they were seeking better working conditions, a 32 hour work-week and adequate compensation for performing their duties.

    Reagan fired 11,345 air traffic controllers, to be exact.


  42. the govt used discretionary action in the case of the Alexander teachers and rightfully paid the aggrieved teachers who had/show sufficient evidence of proof detailing that they were “wronged” over the ten years of tenure under the management and leadership of Jeff Broomes ( an employee of govt)and the govt did nothing about it, Such evidence within itself made the govt liable for any losses during the strike period since the govt was responsible for maintaining a civil environment for the teachers over the years the teachers were aggrieved and the govt failed to do so.Moreover the BSTU was able to have an inquiry which favored their side and removed Broomes
    In the case of the SSS the SSS took striking action in support (of) which had nothing to do with any grievance the Union had brought on behalf of The SSS workers.


  43. Is there a government department named “SSS”?

    Who are these SSS workers?


  44. Only a JA would compare the actions of a country like the US with an island state like Barbados,currently being run by nothingarians masquerading as a Government.I was surprised to hear the moderator Marsha telling a caller to day that Stuart was elected leader of Barbados.Not by the 31% who voted for the alternative nor the 35% that refused to vote for that party.66% of the population would prefer not to have anything to do with these 16 blind mice.


  45. Hants July 22, 2015 at 2:28 PM #, as King Solomon judged the harlots regarding the baby so should the voters judge the political parties regarding Barbados in relation to whether any party would rather destroy Barbados than see it governed by another party.


  46. Into de fyah!!! New FTC board

    “The new chairman is Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Jeff Cumberbatch.”

    “The deputy chairman is Professor Andrew Downes.

    The other members of the Board are Monique Taitt, Kendrid Sargeant, Dr Philmore Alleyne, Dr Donley Carrington, Dawood Pandor and Andrew Willoughby”


  47. @Hants

    Congratulations to Jeff, hope it is not a tactic to shut him up!


  48. And Reagen was smart enough to visualize that the melt down from the airstrike would have been economically catastrophic.
    In the case of the SSA wild cat strikers the govt can do like wise especially when No Union had lodged any grievances or concerns against govt before the sanitation workers went on strike.
    Union relations have now reach an all time low and will continue to deteriorate if the new commandos of the Unions does not rely on discipline action by law and rely on discipline action by political motivation
    The time is closely approaching when legislation to protect the safety and rights of the public becomes necessary if these new breed of Union leaders insist and persist in destroying the countries interest over their own political interest,
    Again govt does not have to pay these striking workers (SSA) not one red cent it is a discretionary action which is protected by law and found in the rules and guidelines of the ILO

    The Committee of Experts has refrained from criticizing the legislation of member States which provide for wage deductions in the event of strike action and has indicated that, as regards strike pay in general the parties should be free to determine the scope of negotiable issues

    Now the Unions find themselves at the mercies of the govt having to beg for assistance, also BTW the ILO also indicates that in the case where strike action affects the public health and safety of a country ,the govt has a right to pursue immediate action
    it is transparently clear even to a blind man the these new Union heads never took time out to research or study the governing labour laws that binds them to act accordingly but rather preferred to react as children having fun in a sand box


  49. “Reagan?That cowboy!”…the words of the late and great EW Barrow.I say no more

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading