โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

George C. Brathwaite
George C. Brathwaite

At the 2007 Annual Delegate’s Conference of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP), the then Leader of the Opposition, David Thompson, began his featured speech by invoking a few disclaimers. It was revealed that there were groups within civil society actively speaking out against several perceived ills. Freedom of expression prevailed in Barbados under the political sacrosanct of the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) that was being led by the economically acclaimed and intellectually gifted Owen Arthur, in spite of mounting and troublesome criticisms against the government.

David Thompson, in his address, said then that the situation in Barbados had reached a stage wherein there were pronounced “signs of frustration and despair.” Thompson goaded the public into thinking that it was inconceivable why the BLP had become “so indifferent and disconnected from the people it was elected to serve.” Thompson’s utterances were glazed in flowery language and buttered with a mischief to exploit weaknesses which appeared in the seemingly invincible Arthur-led team. The DLP, through its leader, promised to “imbue new hope and optimism” into Barbadians because Barbados was on a “slippery slope of division,” and it had become infested by “stagnation and malfeasance in public administration.” One wonders how necessary was this charade at the end of 2007 when now compared with those things have been evidenced this year at the end of 2013?

Read full article


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

328 responses to “Lessons to Guide Another Dichotomous DLP Cabinet: Save Barbados Now!”


  1. @ Brathwaite

    Your views are so wedded to BLP dogma that even when your opening statement agrees with David the text of your contribution reverts to a defense of the Labour Party. We are therefore now forced to relegate you to having some sort of mental condition that limits critical thinking


  2. Tell us about your restructure plan.


  3. @George

    You say that ideals must be fused with a pragmatic approach. Here is an example of why the BLP and DLP modus operandi is similar. When Arthur’s BLP won the government post-Sandiford he inherited a trimmed public service a consequence of the IMF 90s prescription. Can you guess what the BLP did? It grew the public service numbers not attributable to productivity and growth but patrimony.

    We are in the present and many of us have rightly become distrustful and cynical of both political parties. What we ask is for a new system one not wedded to the entrenched to create strategies in the present to guide us to a different path. The path may very well be bumpy but it presents the opportunity to point towards new horizons. As an intelligent beings what else are we suppose to do?

  4. George C. Brathwaite Avatar
    George C. Brathwaite

    @ HH,
    While I may understand your view, I believe that you are misguided. Yes, I am a proud member of the BLP but I have never nor will I solicit for a job or opportunity other than what on merit one could say that i would use my skills and education so that the spoils redound to Barbados. Let us be fair, I am willing to go the people for endorsement, are you prepared to do such?

    @ Pacha
    I am not sure what you were reading but the way you interpreted my response to David is simply your interpretation (or distortion). What must I say other than to see if David may have similarly interpreted it, which I doubt that he will. Without misrepresenting the facts, and certainly looking back through our years of independence, it is practically indisputable that Barbados is currently harnessed to the worst performing Cabinet in its history under the paltry leadership of Stuart even if his intentions are genuine.
    It is not about criticising Stuart’s leadership or the MoF’ weaknesses for the sake of doing so, but to recognise in the absence of a comprehensive execution of economic growth plans, that we are collectively being made worse off.
    Anyway, over to you and may some measure of enlightenment touch you since there are few things that I am willing to commend this crop of DLP ministers for; they have failed barbadians regardless of what you or me think.


  5. I don’t get it Barbados is in dire straits, finally admitted by the DLP, who should of come forth long time and we spend our time on the party train or criticising each other. It doesn’t matter whether your B, D, P, whatever. Its now time to pull together and get our country back on track. It’s not too late, almost but not. Its time to look forward not backwards.

    Barbadians you have the power use it wisely, If you want new leaders demand it, if you want the current leaders, you have the power to control what they can and cannot do, you don’t have to just sit back and take everything. There are more voters than politicians.

    As for reshuffling the cabinet is it really going to make any difference and in terms of timing is it wise? A minister in a new role now having to learn and understand his/her portfolio…..more time wasted.

    I would suggest just stopping for a couple of days and making a list of all the debts, things to be done, where money can be saved, how money can be generated etc. re prioritising, making good decisions on where the funding should be spent or where it is essential that we find funding. Right now it just appears that we are running around like headless chicken’s, ….its just crazy. Whether you are D, B, P or Z you wouldn’t run your household finances like this.


  6. It will be the unmasking of Dr. Estwick.


  7. Brathwaite

    This notion of unending growth has to be, sooner or later, recognized as a anachronism. But again, being wedded to OSA and an economy model that is highly irrelevant, who will never see that the 20th Century notions of economy must go the way of the doo doo bird. We should be stressing better redistribution of wealth and localism, the reverse of what your beloved OSA did when last at bat. He misguidedly, even religiously followed a perverse neo-liberal model which you seem to think still has some application today. This is one of the reasons you and your ilk have to be ‘cleanse’ for the political culture.You think that you are capable of helping but you are the most dangerous people in Barbados. Based solely on the mouthings of OSA we perceive that he himself knows that nothing he knows or though he knew can be helpful to Barbados today. But not the shameless followers like you.


  8. It would be nice if Stinkliar could ask the Minister of Finance in Jamaica , Peter Phillips a question or two. Jamaica is currently in an IMF programme where growth of the economy is critical to the turning around of the the same economy. However, INCREASED TAXATION seemed to be the way out for the government. Regrettably, the more they tax, the less revenue is yielded. Does this sound like what is happening in Barbados?

    Amidst the call by some members of the private sector to increase professional fees on lawyers, doctors, insurance and bank executives, take a look at this extract from the Jamaica Observer where the Jamaican government is trying to use taxation to yield growth in the economy:

    NEW tax measures implemented by the Government to support the 2013/14 Budget in April are not yielding the projected revenues, so more taxes are likely by early next year to top up the flow.
    Minister of Finance and Planning Dr Peter Phillips and Governor of the Bank of Jamaica Brian Wynter made the admission in their latest quarterly communications with the managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Christine Lagarde.

    But there are obviously some clouds on the horizon, as indicated in the communications from the Jamaican Government to Lagarde, especially in terms of tax revenues and the possibility of new tax measures to finance the budget and meet fiscal deficit targets.

    The Government, in its letter to the IMF chief, pointed out that it has implemented all the necessary structural benchmarks included in the programme. However, it explained that economic growth remained weak, unemployment was “much too high”, and fiscal performance in the first half of 2013/14 was “mixed”.

    “Relative to the budget, revenues underperformed mainly due to lower imports and weak economic and labour market conditions,” the Government admitted.

    For the same reasons, the new tax measures implemented at the beginning of the fiscal year are not yielding the intended results, the Government explained, adding that it had to contain recurrent and capital expenditure to be able to meet the fiscal performance criteria, including the primary balance target, the overall public sector balance target, and the indicative targets on revenues and social expenditure.


  9. @Pachamama
    “In short, Brathwaite while, like his master (mistress), pretends to dress up rank partisanship in a patina of being helpful to Barbados. The real and plain truth is that Brathwaite and his boys just want to be back in office again, as soon as possible and by any means necessary.”

    In other words, George Brathwaite is a plain old BLP YARDFOWL who is not about restructuring our politics but about getting his political masters back in power so he can get a pick.


  10. People question the union leaders about their response to the job cut announcement but what has been intriguing is the response of the Private Sector representatives.
    John Williams, Lalu Vaswani and Tony Walcott as spokespersons for the three main private sector associations were critical of government for not taking action to address government spending (cutting the wage bill) over the last year. Everyone knew that it what they were saying at cocktail parties and meetings to anyone who was within earshot.

    Now a serious reduction in government expenditure has been announced, these men do not have the intellectual honesty to come out and say that they support the measure. Instead, they are now saying that they should have been more consultation. Amazing, the same men who complain about the need to speedily implement decisions and urgently cut spending are now trying to make Bajans believe that they are “sorry” to see the government wage bill reduced and that it should have been discussed more and more meetings held, prior to the announcement.

    The private sector leaders have been much more intellectually dishonest than the trade unions in this matter.They support the public job cuts announced but for whatever reason cannot bring themselves to publicly endorse the measure.


  11. @ Bajanfuhlife

    They are seeking to employ civil society as an instrument of a coup d’etat to again remove a government as done previously by OSA. In this Brathwaite is taking his marching orders from MAM who plaining said that civil society should act on the true information, which she has, and create trouble for another DLP government. And she did this from the halls of Parliament Buildings. This is a coup in the making, so Brathwaite is just playing his part. If there is to be a removal, both Bees and Dees, BLP and DLP and the wider dysfunctional system must be removed by broad-based civil action. Not as an instrument for the BLP or the political careerist MAM.


  12. And this is part of your problem Bajanfuhlife, the private sector is against you which means there is no path but down.


  13. BuSSA was drinking spring water! Tell me wa’ y’all drinking? ESA Fields?

  14. George C. Brathwaite Avatar
    George C. Brathwaite

    @ Bajanfuhlife

    Thanks.


  15. Thank you PD… Someone is AWAKE!


  16. @George
    You are very welcome. You can always count on me.


  17. @ David
    If a private sector could determine a government, why do we waste time voting? We remember well how the four White men as heads of the so-called private sector organizations conspired to bring down Sandiford in the coup of 1993-4. If this is system we have or want it should be made clear and stop wasting people’s time.


  18. @ PACHA

    The DEATH of us as NATION has come due to the wrangling and the HOBO mentality of partisan POLYTRICKS! No sense beating the drum brother – BAJANS (like their AMERICAN MASTERS) are the most myopic nincompoops anywhere in the world! Is it any wonder that the structural integrity of these nations are crumbling just like the WALLS OF JERICHO in the face of the fluglehorn of GRIDLOCK, INERTIA, COMPLACENCY & MIASMA?

    Until we as nation ABANDON the 47 years of partisan politics and look to turn a NEW LEAF – the moving tectonic plates of DEBT, FISCAL IRRESPONSIBILITY & as PLANTATION DEEDS continually suggest – “EPIC FRAUD” will eat away the very soul of what our foreparents held dear!

    I absolutely 2nd all you’ve said!


  19. @Pachca

    By your writings you have shown that you understand the role money plays in campaign financing and the quid pro quo which is a consequence. Why do you think both parties have resisted transparency legislation all these years? Why do you think Jada/Bejerham is winning (being awarded) the government contracts and before them Parris was large and in charge? Under BLP it was Sir Cow. And the beat goes on.


  20. @ David
    Merely rhetorical!


  21. @David
    Many in the Chamber of Commerce pumped thousands in the BLP campaign and did not get the return on investment they were expecting. This is the time for them to put Barbados first .
    They know that the fiscal deficit had to be tackled and they say that people are overtaxed, the adjustment had to come on the expenditure side.
    They should have the balls to call it like they see it when it is a government action that they agree with in the same way that they do when it is an action or tax that they oppose.
    Bizzy Williams implored them to put Barbados first because he saw a hint of economic sabotage aka capital flight.
    Are you telling me that the Private Sector Association, The Chamber Of Commerce and the Barbados Employers Confederation like the BLP more than they like Barbados?
    It is time to call out John Williams, Lalu Vaswani and Tony Walcott to answer this question.


  22. Here here Hammy!

    Until some of these “SUCKERS” spend a long stretch of some HARD TIME in DODDS – neither one of our political parties gonna’ get any respect from the masses of disgruntled citizens!

    Just in: JP MORGAN CHASE was just slapped with a 13 BILLION $$$$ fine for some pretty NASTY STUFF – question? Who gine jail? Answer: not a man jack!

    Does this smell? You betcha’! Will anything change? Yes! When? after revolution unseats the CORRUPTION and the checks & balances are put in place to guarantee the SOVEREIGNTY of the people’s RIGHTS!

    PERIOD>


  23. @ David
    However, the types of involvements which the private sector in Barbados has shown in the past goes beyond issues of campaign funding alone.


  24. @Bajanfuhlife

    There is truth in your last comment BUT the private sector is anti government at the moment and there will be one winner. This is the unpleasant place we find ourselves.


  25. @Pacha

    Campaign finance issue was one of the weighted examples which is hitched to governance issues of course.

  26. millertheanunnaki Avatar

    @ Bajanfuhlife | 27/12/2013 at 11:07 am
    โ€œNow a serious reduction in government expenditure has been announced, these men do not have the intellectual honesty to come out and say that they support the measure. Instead, they are now saying that they should have been more consultation..โ€

    In addition to you, Bajanfuhlife (the pot for a yard-fowl), calling GCB (the kettle of a yard-bird) โ€˜blackโ€™ you are on also on another political suicide mission to bring the DLP administration to a most premature downfall by attacking the Private Sector that still employs people “excess to requirements” and pay over taxes.
    Go ahead fella, continue to attack the Private Sector and see how long you last in 2014.

    A serious cut in expenditure would only be realised and accepted in the eyes of fair-minded people when your moribund DLP administration do the following:

    Reduce the size of the Cabinet to a manageable cost efficient and effective level.
    Lead by example and trim the Executive. A fifteen (15) member Cabinet could be considered reasonable given the size country, the current size of the economy and the absolute need for a significant reduction in the role of the public sector in future economic activities limiting its role primarily to one of regulation and arbitration.

    Merge a number of entities and ministries. A working list has already been given to you guys.

    Eliminate politically partisan discretionary expenditures like the football sponsorship, constituency councils, free bus fares and summer camps.
    Do not replace the existing ML&MP vehicles with inappropriate high-powered fuel guzzlers burning up scare foreign exchange.

    Privatize and outsource all commercial oriented entities currently own and managed by the government. You already know the list the IMF has identified for โ€œprivate sectorโ€ involvement.

    Most of all, collect the millions of taxes owed by people who are protected by the same political administration. Start with a few million from Greenverbs Sonny Pookie.
    Also, you can ask Sir Frank Alleyne for a list of the other tax evaders/dodgers that he knows so well especially those in the professional class instead of robbing the poor workers (easy targets) of the little $650.00 tax credit in a most reverse Robin Hood fashion.


  27. Now we get to separate the men from the boys, very shortly…. AND if they are no men, we get to verbally whip the boys….I can’t wait.


  28. Caswell, this is one for you. News coming to hand is that persons 55 years and over will be the target to be among the 3,000 to 6,000 to be laid off next year.


  29. @ Anon

    Well said!


  30. @ David,

    “Can you guess what the BLP did? It grew the public service numbers not attributable to productivity and growth but patrimony.”

    He also encouraged the development of small businesses through funding(even if inappropriately structured and administered). What were the other options for shifting employment to the private sector in a small, limited economy where certain professions are frowned upon..the privatisation of some government services?


  31. @Miller
    You must make everything political ?
    I simply observed that if the government is doing something which the private sector called for, the private sector representatives should be bold enough to say so in the same way that they criticize when there is a policy that they do not agree with.
    Away from the cameras, the people in the private sector will tell you that they knew this cut was needed years ago.
    I did not attack anyone personally so there is no need to build up a Straw Man to tear it down.


  32. @enuff

    Agree jobs were created and some were manufactured. A win lose?


  33. In any serious democracy, where accountability matters, Mr. Sinkler would be in the ranks of the unemployed since he has failed to even begin to institute any real economic policy; we would be going back to the polls to allow the people to determine if there was indeed a โ€œbetrayalโ€.

    FIRING STINKLIAR IS A WASTE OF TIME
    APPOINTING ESTWICK iIS A WASTE OF TIME

    If I were Dr. Estwick ,and I am glad I am not, I would refuse it. Now that it get stink up , you bringing it to me. Estwick should demand elections or cross the floor.

    THE DLP LIED TO THE PEOPLE, HAVE FAILED TO MANAGE THE ECONOMY AND JUST CANNOT MANAGE

    THE DLP SHOULD RESIGN AND CALL FRESH ELECTIONS.
    LET THE PEOPLE DETERMINE WHAT PROGRAMME THEY WILL SUPPORT.

    ALL THE TALK ABOUT SENDING HOME PEOPLE AND CUTTING SALARIES SHOULD CEASE NOW. GET BACK TO THE POLLS.

    THE REAL DISCUSSION SHOULD BE ABOUT SEEKING A FRESH MANDATE.
    THERE MUST BE FRESH ELECTIONS
    THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD RESIGN
    THEY HAVE BETRAYED THE PEOPLE AND CANNOT BE TRUSTED TO KEEP THEIR WORD. THERE SHOULD BE ONE DEBATE GOING ON RIGHT NOW !

    THEY WANT TO CUT THE PUBLIC SERVICE AND CUT SALARIES TOO
    WHO IS TO GUARANTEE THAT THEY KEEP THEIR WORD ON ANYTHING
    Lโ€”โ€”Iโ€”โ€”โ€“A โ€”โ€”โ€”Rโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”S
    THIS IS NOT JOKE WE JOKING
    THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS


  34. Curry Soursop | 27/12/2013 at 12:23 pm | Reply

    Caswell, this is one for you. News coming to hand is that persons 55 years and over will be the target to be among the 3,000 to 6,000 to be laid off next year.

    nonsense !
    They can only ask such persons or –Dottined them
    What package will they offer ?
    The Temporary People will go ; It happened in 1992 and in 1981
    I know of people who gave up jobs for ‘election jobs’ in 2013
    How stupid ? But they were led astray.

    The US economy is showing signs of serious improvement so there might be some positive things happening there.
    BUT
    THE DLP MUST GO. THE DLP MUST RESIGN. GO BACK TO THE POLLS. THEY LIED

    -L———I———–A———R——-S


  35. @Just Asking. My question might look trivial, but I do not put anything pass this inept and corrupt bunch of DLP Cabinet Ministers. They will find creative ways of out-foxing the vulnerable public servants who believe whole heartedly in the NUPW, BUT and BWU.

    If it is Last in First Out” a.k.a ( LIFO) a lot of the DLP parasites that flooded the NHC in particular and other places will be displaced. No wonder the riot gears have been brought in and stored at the BDF headquarters.


  36. If one looks at the level of engagement by the membership of the NUPW for example can we say there is confidence shown? 1000 members voted in the last election.


  37. Might I add, Just Asking, persons in Inland Revenue have been given memos to the effect.


  38. How can we be instruments of change when, as between ourselves, nothing changes? Where and what in all this is the common ground?


  39. @ BU, NUPW is just “playing to the gallery”., “Shadow Boxing”, “Playing Brer Anancy” with workers lives. Do not take them serious. They know exactly what is going on. Don’t mind the fluff and parade being displayed on radio , TV and in the newspapers. I am waiting on the 4:30pm Starcom news to see if I will be disappointed in anything that they have to say


  40. As a Friend of Barbados from the Great White North, who is neither a B nor a D, DD finds it distressing that there has been no discussion in this blog of the video of the talk by James D Wolfensohn, former head of the World Bank Group, posted by Plantation Deeds

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Wolfensohn and http://www.wolfensohn.com/about-us/

    DD does not profess to have the answers to what needs to be done to fix the financial and economic, (and political or social) problems in which Barbados finds itself. Nor apparently do the politicians and policy makers of either stripe, or others of the 285,000 who call Barbados home. If they had the answers Barbados would not find itself where it is after 47 years of building a society.

    DD believes it is time to โ€œlook outside the boxโ€ for a rescue plan from sources beyond its shores other than IMF and China.

    In 1979, Chrysler Corporation, the third largest US automaker, hovered on the verge of collapse, a victim of sharply declining revenue and cash-on-hand that had reached the level of threatening daily operations.

    Barbados is not Chrysler; but its financial position does sound familiar?

    Wolfensohn was a key player in the reorganization of Chrysler, and if engaged as a consultant, he could be a key player in the reorganization of Barbados.

    Time to engage Wolfensohn, or someone with similar background and qualifications in developing economies, to help thinking outside the box.

    How to pay his consultant fees? Sell the BMWs and Mercedes and use those the proceeds to pay the consultant fees; and lease Suzuki Celerios. That would have the added benefit of reducing petroleum imports and support the Green Economy initiative.

    Happy New Year to the BU family.

  41. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Bajanfuhlife | 27/12/2013 at 12:36 pm | Reply
    “Miller You must make everything political?”

    If I am allowed to borrow a Bush Tea expression: “Skippa” or “Brass Bowl” everything you write on this blog is political. Don’t you think that calling George Brathwaite a yardfowl is also “Political”?
    Don’t you think sending home 3,000 public sector workers aimed primarily at those deemed sympathetic to the political party in Opposition and not keen on adhering to the sound Labour Relations principles and practices of “Meritocracy and “Last Employees in First Employees Out” is grossly “Political”?

    We know your agenda (same as ac or CCC or the rest of the George St. brigade of liars and deceivers) so don’t start crying IMF (It’s Miller’s fault) around us.

    What we would like you to do is to address the suggestions made to make the programme of cutting expenditure in the public sector more realistically palatable to the broad masses of people, reduce the fiscal deficit and provide a fillip to generate private sector activity which is the fulcrum of economic growth and recovery.


  42. Wow, the NUPW has thrown down the gauntlet to government.

    Rollback VAT to 15% they say?

    Reduce ministers allowance they say?

    Make children pay bus fares they say?

    Public servants to forfeit 1 weeks pay next year they say?

    Why the hell are we discussing these union proposals now anyway?


  43. @ BU, don’t mind the NUPW,/Cedric Murrell is included in this as well with the “fluff”, and :bluff”. This is just trying to look important and relevant as if they have done something. We have heard all of those already EXCEPT, the giving up of the weeks salary. I wonder why the Constituency Councils, David Thompson Memorial Football Competition, Summer, Winter, Spring and Autumn Camps were excluded. LOL A bunch of political nutbags.


  44. @ David

    “Make children pay bus fares they say?” NUPW suggestion makes lots of sense as simple as it may appear.

    I estimated that there are 50,000 primary and secondary school children on the island at any given time. I plucked this info of the internet, do forgive me if my numbers are off.

    To compensate for error I approximate that 50% of the 50K ride for free (25,000 per day). A school year approximates to 36 weeks. Lets do the arithmetic at $1 per trip or $2/day. This suggests $50,000/day in loss revenue for 36 weeks. This equates to $9 mil loss in a school year and these are conservative numbers. 5 years into this crap is $45 mil never to ne recovered unless we up the fare to $4/day for 5 years. Again conservative.

    The auto workers union claims that the board owes them $15 mil for repairs done, May I add that repairs are still being done, so $15 mil and counting. For simplicity this is one of the reasons why isn’t it?

    Does it make sense to have children ride the bus for free to get a free education? Maybe. So we should feel guilty if it is reversed? Teaching them the wrong things in life and the wrong things in school (hence the photo published in the Nation a few months backed that annoyed Mr. Integrity himself, Deputy Commissioner Mark Thompson. What a nice guy) But who pays for the diesel, drivers and the repairs?

    I think this policy needs to be reversed base on common sense arithmetic to cover the cost of diesel, repairs and drivers.

    This was another of DEM dumb, wasteful ideas that got us in this pickle that has no ending.


  45. The Fatted Calf Brigade have brought their pigs to a fine market.Instead of a cabinet reshuffle,a new mandate should be sought from the people on the way forward.We might learn that the growth of our GDP is a more to do with confidence in our leadership than the gibberish of the George Street pen pushers.There is no confidence in this PM and he can talk ’til the cows come home,a new mandate is required to do things differently and hopefully blunt the effect of Christine Lagarde’s IMF prescription .Of course this PM will have to be pushed into seeking the mandate.


  46. @Askquith

    According to government spokesmen the free bus fare is part of a social policy to counter the counter culture emanating from the minibus sector.


  47. Based on recent videos and images can we say that the policy has worked or is working?

    Re NUPW, shouldnt there have been negotiation BEFORE the announcement?

    just observing

  48. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2013 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2013 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad

    Avon and DD , as you can see by the comments they are still doing BLP and DLP and the new DBLP government chat back and forth. This how they were trained to behave , to turn on each other and not the crooks liars and scumbags , Did any one see what Iceland did?

    http://disinfo.com/2012/07/iceland-jails-bankers-erases-citizens-debt-recovers-strongly/
    We at Plantation Deeds know what they did and done and still doing , We will keep at the dlp and blp head till they get it ,
    The Truth will set thing right , this to Us is a Barbados crime scene of 166 Square Miles\
    England 1066 = 13
    Little England 166 Square miles = 13
    Independence 1966= 13

    Hope you know what 13 meaning ,, Ask a Mason or a Moor 1+3= foundation


  49. @Miller……. Caswell and Prodigal Son. What do you make of Dennis Clarke’s/ NUPW proposals..

  50. aBajan New Yorker Avatar
    aBajan New Yorker

    David and the BU family, do you all agree or accept that the union suggestions are solutions to the problems or just buying the 3,000+ works more time.

    in thevend the problems in the civil service remain untouch and thd broken system allow to bleed to death.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading