Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Pachamama

Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive – (Sir) Walter Scott

President Barack Obama seeking the approval of Congress to strike Syria.
President Barack Obama seeks approval of Congress to strike Syria

Even in the face of clear evidence that the Syrian government had nothing to do with the alleged use of chemical weapons (CW) in Ghouta around the 21th August 2013, the war party advances. Indeed, the evidence now points clearly at the Western backed, Takfiri, Al-Qaeda, heart eating, hand chopping, head severing terrorists supported by America and her allies that include Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Israel, UAE, France, UK and Qatar. Terrorists, who used CW in Syria 14 separate times, some of whom were caught with CW in Turkey, were responsible for the CW attack in Aleppo where 28 died and who have projected themselves on an endless number of YouTube videos testing chemical weapons. The feign moral pretense by John Kerry, Barrack Obama and their acolytes must be accompanied by a massive propaganda war to hide the lack of morality or truth in their pack of lies. The United States and its allies are indeed the ones who most often used CW or supplied them to belligerents in times of war and peace. Indeed, the USA has vast stockpiles of all kinds of chemical, biological, conventional and nuclear weapons waiting to be used on humanity. Not even Gorbachev could persuade the American to destroy its nuclear weapons.  And whereas, there were many times in the recent past where chemical and other banned weapons were use by America, Israel and other belligerents supported by the West. And whereas, the United States of America has, from its establishment, used false flag operations or ‘national security events’ as reasons for engagement in foreign wars in order to achieve political objectives or even change political calculations at home. And whereas, the determination by Obama and the military-industrial-security apparatus is just another bald-faced lie by this administration, to pimp Obama out as a war criminal to achieve corporate objectives, we must conclude that this here war is premeditated.

During the early 1930’s Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich rose to power in Germany. The forces at work in this circumstance were not dissimilar to the powers that are driving this irrational thrust into World War 3. We have previously, like Naomi Wolf and others, compared the USA post 9/11 to the rise of Hitler’s Germany. Though no two historical moments are ever precisely the same, the naysayers bring up all kinds of tangential points as to deflect from our central determination. They say that Hitler killed 6 million Jewish people while totally relegating the up to 70 million that died in WW11. Of these nearly 30 million were from the USSR. Well, today the United States of America through its proxies in eastern Congo, alone, has supplied weapons that have killed between 4.5 and 6 million people since 1995. But of course, these are Black people, so nobody is expected to make the critical connection even on numerical significance. The naysayers have an entrenched belief that somehow we are in some enlightened or modern era and that human depravity, as expressed by the wickedly great Adolf Hitler, could not be applied to the humans of 2013. But these very expressions are being exhibited by the ‘modern’ western ‘civilization, in some ways we are worse, much worse.

Although IBM, Ford and others supplied the Nazis with war materiel, intelligence and technological knowhow, Hitler lacked a generalized global information supremacy which Barack Obama now has. It was his information Czar, Goebbels, who said, similarly to the ‘banksters’ of an earlier period, ‘I care not about the politics, give me control of the media and I will determine what the people think’. Obama knows this well. At the beginning of the push to war escalation less than 10 percent of Americans were in favour. Less than 10 percent of Europeans were in favour. In the last 4 or 5 days we have seen the work of Goebbels in 2013 America. A work that undergirds the ‘modern’ public relations/advertizing industry and originally theorized by Edward Bernays, the cousin of the Sigmund Freud, and latter Walter Lippmann, changed the perceptions of the American people to an acceptance of the involvement in far off  wars, especially World War 1, women smoking, ‘women liberation’ etc.  The number of Americans who now perceive a war with Syria as a good thing has increased dramatically to nearly 30 percent in just 4 or 5 days. Not even Goebbels was so proficient. Of course the Nazis did not have satellites, they did not have a rampant NSA, they did not have a globalized eavesdropping network that dominates all communications and they certainly did not have more than 10,000 thermal nuclear weapons able to destroy all life on earth many times over. Obama and the West are many time more dangerous than Adolf Hitler ever could have been. But this will not persuade their followers from supporting their acts of war, including illegal threats to sovereign states.

The blatant invasions of world countries by Hitler are only surpassed by the continuous assaults by the American Empire on what was once seen as the sanctity of national sovereignty. There are some who, in defending Adolf Hitler, have argued that Germany was ‘unfaired’ after World War 1 by an ‘international community’ that took its colonies in Africa and other demands for war reparations etc. Today, it is Obama and Bush who have extended Empire to Africa with Africom – the African military command. They contend that certain Jewish figures in the global banking establishment conspired against Germany. Today, these very interests have declared war on the world and are seeking to consolidate all resources into fewer and fewer hands.  Before World War 2 Germany invaded Slovakia (1939), Lithuania (1939), Czechoslovakia (1939), Sudetenland (1938) and Austria (1938). During the World War Two, Hitler invaded Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg, France, The Channel Islands, Greece, Yugoslavia, the USSR and Egypt. In the last hundred years the American Empire has invaded countries in the Western Hemisphere more than 100 times, all told. But this is to them ‘old fashion wars’, for the global war as declared by Empire is constantly at work against all countries. Whether it be eavesdropping, trade wars, space wars, secret wars or the old fashion hot wars of conquest, Obama is worse than Hitler as the instrument for colonial domination of the world. Certainly, his irrational determination that the hot war in Syria is to be escalated is reminiscent of the acts by Hitler himself.

There are those of us who are quick to ignore the technological narrowing of the gap between actors as it relates to the ability to conduct hot warfare, or any kind of war, for that matter. There are some who would want to hold firm to a simplistic notion of a war theater while ignoring the ever changing tactical situation, they hold fast to a singularity of strategic vision. There are some whose judgments are colored by an emotionalism that just serves as cannon fodder for the propagandists. Less still have ever seen a war or even a shot fired in anger, but feel competent to make judgments as informed by mainstream media. Most have never seen the places where these wars of conquest are fought, they do not know the peoples, the wider culture and are guided by an inbreed thinking that regardless of the righteousness of the ‘other’, the English peoples of the world have some ‘God’ given right to the eternal domination, exploitation and eradication of other peoples. Years after and even when the truth is known we hear not about war reparations from the guilty belligerent. We, in the West, do not even want to recognize war crimes committed by America in Fallujah, for example, where depleted uranium (DU) weapons used by America has contamination the gene pool thus making generations for the 25000 years pay a price for America’s sins. But it is Obama and the current generation of war hawks and their supporters who would want to commit this future crime on the unborn of the Syrian Arab Republic. This thinking is just as culpable as that which came from the Hitlerian mind. It is a thinking which is indeed no better than that from the mind of the man who solemnly promised change but ends up being as brutal, as warlike, as Hitler himself.

We contend that any escalation in the Western sponsored war in Syria, as one of many scenarios, could see the manifestations of World War Three. That Obama and others could, on the basis of a pack of lies, be the chief cheerleader for this possible scenario tells us that hidden forces are speaking through him, that this was his intention from the beginning, that his office by its very nature can only be held by war criminals and that Obama has been assigned the duty of ending any resistance to Empire anywhere on the globe. On balance, America has been able to advance its cultural domination by telling a long series of lies in order to instigate wars, coups and other ‘unfriendly acts’. Whether it was the invasion of the Philippines, the Spanish-American War, the Gulf of Tonkin, the Iraq wars, the Grenada invasion, Lebanon, Haiti or Kosovo, the same game is played from the same play book of deception. Obama’s war of deception on Syria will fail, for this criminal act cannot be allowed to succeed. These tangled webs of deceit must be carefully unwoven if we are to find our better selves and assign all forms of warfare to the pages of history.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

213 responses to “Obama’s America is Hitler’s Germany of 2013”


  1. David
    That note under the photo of the modern Hitler is factually and legally incorrect.


  2. @Pachaa

    We can debate the legalese of the issue but it is what he asserts:

    http://rt.com/usa/obama-syria-strike-congress-415/


  3.  
    Now that war fever is heating up again, this is a good reminder from the days of the first Gulf War how easy it is to manipulate public opinion into supporting another costly war as long as you are skilled in propaganda techniques and have the nerve to boldly and shamelessly tell whatever lies are necessary to support your manipulation of public opinion.

    Because memories are short (including mine), it pays to be reminded.  The FIRST Gulf War was based on a lie too. How they conned us 23 years ago… Video: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/24436.html

    The above was submitted by Green Money:


  4. Poor Assad, at least he has one friend/apologist.
    Poor Ghadafi!
    But no one cared enough even to comment about the genocide in Dharfur or Mali, understandable as they are only Africans on the receiving end.


  5. @ David
    Since when do you accept what professional politicians say as true? This is our article not his. We want to make a case against him not be his stenographer for him. If he wants to rebut anything here let him come or his minions could try.

    The facts that only the UN can declare war, except in self defense. Not even the Congress of the USA has a right, under US law, to declare war in other than self defense. Even when they agree to war Obama has to then convince the UNSC. Anything else is illegal. On the other hand it is Syria and her allies who can legal engage the US in war because of the threats made by the USA.


  6. oh give it a rest pachaman all the past events and revision of history from hitler to bush would not erase and hide the truth of what is happening in syria and the unleashing of deadly nerve gas on children ! men and woman young and old by a govt who claims to know nothing but does nothing to avoid , to ass-ad ac says HELP IS ON THE WAY, in the mean time u pachamn best be careful of accusing Obama for past or present.Criminal activity without proof . in the meantime i suggest that if your do not temper your languiage that there is a possiblity of having your phone tapped and your balls hot wired remote style,


  7. From global Research;

    Did the White House Help Plan the Syrian Chemical Attack?

    There is a growing volume of new evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East — mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its sponsors and supporters — which makes a very strong case, based on solid circumstantial evidence, that the August 21, 2013, chemical strike in the Damascus suburbs was indeed a pre-meditated provocation by the Syrian opposition.

    The extent of US foreknowledge of this provocation needs further investigation because available data puts the “horror” of the Barack Obama White House in a different and disturbing light.

    On August 13-14, 2013, Western-sponsored opposition forces in Turkey started advance preparations for a major and irregular military surge. Initial meetings between senior opposition military commanders and representatives of Qatari, Turkish, and US Intelligence [“Mukhabarat Amriki”] took place at the converted Turkish military garrison in Antakya, Hatay Province, used as the command center and headquarters of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and their foreign sponsors. Very senior opposition commanders who had arrived from Istanbul briefed the regional commanders of an imminent escalation in the fighting due to “a war-changing development” which would, in turn, lead to a US-led bombing of Syria.

    The opposition forces had to quickly prepare their forces for exploiting the US-led bombing in order to march on Damascus and topple the Bashar al-Assad Government, the senior commanders explained. The Qatari and Turkish intelligence officials assured the Syrian regional commanders that they would be provided with plenty of weapons for the coming offensive.

    Indeed, unprecedented weapons distribution started in all opposition camps in Hatay Province on August 21-23, 2013. In the Reyhanli area alone, opposition forces received well in excess of 400 tons of weapons, mainly anti-aircraft weaponry from shoulder-fired missiles to ammunition for light-guns and machineguns. The weapons were distributed from store-houses controlled by Qatari and Turkish Intelligence under the tight supervision of US Intelligence.

    These weapons were loaded on more than 20 trailer-trucks which crossed into northern Syria and distributed the weapons to several depots. Follow-up weapon shipments, also several hundred tons, took place over the weekend of August 24-25, 2013, and included mainly sophisticated anti-tank guided missiles and rockets. Opposition officials in Hatay said that these weapon shipments were “the biggest” they had received “since the beginning of the turmoil more than two years ago”. The deliveries from Hatay went to all the rebel forces operating in the Idlib-to-Aleppo area, including the al-Qaida affiliated jihadists (who constitute the largest rebel forces in the area).

    Continued at:
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/did-the-white-house-help-plan-the-syrian-chemical-attack/5347542


  8. What a waste of energy.Balderdash,all of it!Let’s get Barbados ready for post Stuart and his band of incompetents.Let the UN lead on this Syrian dictator who has followed in his father’s footsteps and gassed his own people!


  9. From reports on the internet, it appears that there is still a good chance that Congress will refuse to go along with Obama’s plans to launch attacks on Syrian government forces. Apparently Congressional staffers are reporting US citizens calling in to their offices in ratios up to 10 to 1 against any US involvement in this proposed Syrian operation.

    I would guess after years of being led into expensive and debilitating overseas wars by propaganda, fearmongering and outright deception on the part various presidential administrations, Americans are taking to heart ex-President GW Bush’s pithy observation: “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me – can’t get fooled again!”

    However, If I was a US serviceperson stationed on one of their ships in the Med, I;’d be on the lookout for a staged event or false flag attack possibly from Israel to get the US military solidly involved in an attack on Syria. It appears Israel and their US lobby group AIPAC is hot to trot to get this war underway as a prelude to having the US launch an all out attack on Iran.

    Recall the news the other day of the mysterious Israeli test missiles fired from out in the Mediterranean in an Easterly direction, (i.e. in the direction of Syria). These “test” missiles were launched without the customary heads up public warnings to alert shipping and air traffic so they can avoid the area, and it only became known after the Russkies detected the launches and advised the world, so to speak. Considering that that whole region is a powder keg set to go off, it seems at first glance extraordinarily irresponsible for the Israelis to be carrying out missile tests like this unannounced given the current tensions in the area.

    However, if the Russkies had not detected the launch of these missiles, but Assad’s forces had detected two missiles coming in from the sea and heading in their direction, decided in a panic that the US attack was now on, and consequently launched a retaliatory missile strike against some of the US Navy ships in the area, it would have been all the excuse the USA needed to immediately start a full scale assault on Syria, Congressional approval or not. Obama would just announce that the US Navy ships cruising in international waters, not acting in a belligerent fashion and minding their own business had come under attack by Syrian forces of the mad dictator Assad and therefore the US had no choice but to respond in kind with their long planned missile attack.

    If you think this is far fetched just research the Gulf of Tonkin incident in which the Johnson Administration used a supposed (but non existent) North Vietnamese attack on a US destroyer cruising in international waters in the Gulf of Tonkin to gin up US public support for the US to order supposed retaliatory bombing raids on North Vietnam and to escalate their overall military involvement in the Vietnam war.


  10. What is the next step in Syria? Will the US or Israel sink a US warship or launch a terror atack to get the war agenda back on track?

    The war for the bankers (or the war for the petrodollar, or the war to revive Bretton-Woods; they are really all the same) has stumbled. The official US Government claim that Bashar al-Assad invited the United Nations Chemical Weapons inspectors into Syria, the unleashed a chemical weapon attack, not against the leaders of the hired mercenaries trying to oust him, but against women and children, was a non-starter right from the very beginning.

    In determining if a story coming from the government or media is a lie, it is important to look for what should be there and isn’t. In this story, what should be there and isn’t is a MOTIVE for Assad to launch a gas attack against women and children. John Kerry, John McCain, Barack Obama, etc. et. al. can scream their baseless accusations all they want, but they cannot answer the question of just WHY Assad would carry out a chemical weapon attack on women and children. Such an attack serves no military purpose at all. There is nothing to be gained by that attack, which did, after all strike his own soldiers. Assad gains nothing politically from such an attack, indeed risks alienating the 70% of the Syrian people who support him (according to NATO’s figures). In short, what should be there in the official story but is not is Assad’s motive for carrying out a chemical weapon attack on women and children right in front of the UN chemical weapons inspectors. And that, along with the prima fascia absurdity of the official story, is why we know it it a lie, just like the lies about Saddam’s nuclear weapons, stolen Kuwaiti incubators, torpedoes in the Gulf of Tonkin, Spanish mines in Havana Harbor, etc. etc. etc. etc.

    http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/nextstepsyria.php


  11. Read Page # 3 of Barbados Today http://epaper.barbadostoday.bb/ and then lets have a chat about why Mottley felt it necessary to Wire Tap even Arthur, we know she is a Sick Perverted Beast but we never knew she was such a low life to listen to people on their private call, or what they would have expected to be private calls, another Sin of CWC 2007 made worse with a power hungry beast like Mottley as AG


  12. This is silly hysterical nonsense. How can Obama, whatever his faults, be the Hitler of 2013? How can this historically illiteracy be considered a serious suggestion?
    What about the medieval, barbaric rulers of the Middle East and those in the Balkans?


  13. Such a diatribe can only come from a quarter where the thinking is lower intestinal – Lower intestine does the thinking, transfers it to the very tiny brain and out comes the polluted outpouring of mess.

    Hitler’s agenda – To rid the planet of inferior races starting with the Jews and the infirm and right on down the line – No Pachamama or anyone not of the Aryan race.

    So now an American president is similarly characterised as having the gas chambers on low heat waiting for human fuel.

    May be you heard the joke about the Italian who didn’t understand English and wrote to another mama “Mama, this America I no like, this America a bad place, Mama I think I come home”.
    Pachamama’s advice to fellow citizens?






  14. Hal Austin, you are such a complete jackass writing about tired nonsense every week. We knew this will rile you. We intend to put up a stalwart defense of out position. We defend all of our positions. In fact, the matters that you pretend to talk about every week, you know not of. You fu*king cun*hole.


  15. @ Pacha

    You have reverted to the foulmouthed, empty-brain idiot you are. Your vicious, aggressive nonsense is typical of your contributions.
    It is historical illiteracy and political ignorance to compare Obama with Hitler. Even you as a dimwit could see that. As to provoking me, you could not if you tried. It is just that your nasty ignorance should be challenged.
    Put up your ideological defence of your bogus political position and we will debate them on the BU line.
    My fear is that some young Barbadian may read you half-learned nonsense and believe you.



  16. We can also seek to compare you to Hitler, you idiot. In fact, any body could be compared to anybody else c**thole.


  17. I rest my case. You are clearly barmy and incapable of an intelligent conversation..


  18. @Hal Austin
    But what are your substantive objections. Save your diatribes to those few who have an interests, we dont. We reiterate, Today’s Obama is Hitler of 2013. We have advances a number of similarities. You advance the dissimilarities not make grand charges supported by nothing. Nobody, can tell us how to think. And we think that Obama is the Hitler of 2013. Prove this wrong!


  19. @ Hal Austin
    We were never persuaded that you had any intelligence so why would we want to have a conversation with you. Fuc*ing Idiot!


  20. I notice you now speak with the collective ‘we’. The point is, silly boy, Obama has done a lot wrong, which I can be critical of, but HE IS NOT the Hitler of 2013. It is ludicrous and hysterical.
    We can compare anyone with anyone, but there is a point when men in white coats come to take you away.
    I am not here to defend Obama, but the comparison is nuts. Is he more like Hitler than Bush junior, Tony Blair, Reagan, Pinochet, or any number of recent leaders?
    You argument is untenable and ill-informed.


  21. Profanity again. You are one sick man. But you can be, hiding behind a shadow of a name. Too scared to reveal your real self.


  22. A great Barbadian journalist, maybe the only one, Gladstone Holder, and we seldom agreed with him, has compared several American and British leaders to Hitler. But black, ugly people like Hal Austin lack a real historical memory. Who would call Gladstone Holder by the epithets this writer has been so described.


  23. @ Hal Austin
    As we told you before we have no commitment to your murderous queen’s language. And see no difference between what you call cursing and english.


  24. I knew Gladstone Holder. He taught me at St Giles and went to a decent secondary school. He was not vile and brain dead. He thought through his ideas.


  25. We have concluded that the reign of Obama has many similarity to that of Adolf Hitler and that is our opinion. You make the alternative case by debunking this writer point by point. Tell us why Obama is dissimilar to his father, Hitler


  26. She is my Queen now. Barbados is a Monarchy.


  27. @ Pacha

    You and your ‘we’ obviously need something to keep you busy.


  28. Why dont you think through your. Holder was just as backward as you are. At least he was able to make the same comparison we have have. All we hear from you are platitudes, where is your counter narrative? Fuc*king Idiot

  29. Cuthbert of England Avatar
    Cuthbert of England

    Pacamama

    He is a fu@king idiot?


  30. Hal Austin
    Carry yuh black ass. How we spend our time is none of your business. Where is the counter narrative?


  31. language, language. Come on Rover, go out in the yard and play.


  32. Up your mama’s c***hole


  33. @ Pachama

    Oh. I did not realise I was black. What a discovery. Go and graze.


  34. @ Pachama

    You do all this because you are a coward hiding behind a bogus name. It is what naughty children do. Naughty, naughty.


  35. @ Ugly Hal Austin
    You again with your puerile pleadings. This is no court of law.


  36. @ Hal Austin
    Yes you are black and ugly, but with a white mind.


  37. @ Pachama

    Now you are a lookist. I am ugly. Damn, my parents let me down. That is why I am here picking on poor Pachama and exposing his (their) semi-literate rants.
    Behave or leave the kitchen, Rover. Take that bone with you.


  38. This is sad.


  39. @ Pachama

    My white mind! Or is it off white? Dr Pachama plse tell me which part of the body is the mind.


  40. @ David
    You started it with your suggestion under the photo of Obama. Could you not find a photo of Obama with the Hitler beard. Or a photo of Hitler himself?


  41. @David
    Your were not even punctilious enough to spell Syria right


  42. The Muff never conveyed such nonsense to his students so this is an assertion astounds me and seems totally out of character of the man who taught me for some years.

    Those being characterised as of the same ilk as Hitler must know their race would have been exterminated many decades ago.


  43. We have invited that short bulk of human waste, Hal Austin, to make one substantive point to support his argument, his counter narrative. He has, up to now demurred. As a writer we maintain our right to proffer any set of ideas. Here we are saying that there are several similarities between Hitler and Obama and we maintain that argument. Why are we to accept, as fact, that Obama is not Hitler reincarnated, because it is the ‘reasonable’ thing to do. We say not!


  44. @Pacha

    It is sad because it matters not how many degrees we have what is common is the proclivity to resort to base behaviour when there is disagreement. It many ways the ME discord mirrors this position. It is the animal and primitive in a supposedly civilized race which seems to fuel the East West impasse. We will die and it will be with us.


  45. @ Pachama

    I am short now. It is that post-war malnutrition.
    This is not for you, Pacha, you don’t understand, but for the other readers. I am not going to give legitimacy to you (singular or plural) on a bogus issue. Come with something more substantive and I will take you up.
    Be careful with Obama. He has gas chambers in the Arizona desert.
    I am now off to a seminar on capitalist banking at one of our nice business schools. Talk to you again soon. And don’t be a naughty boy(s).

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending