Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Finance Minister, Christopher Sinckler with Board members of the Financial Services Commission. Others, from left, are: Felton Burton, Professor Frank Alleyne, Lawson Yearwood, Virginia Mapp, Sir Neville Nicholls and Jefferson Cumberbatch – Photo Credit: Advocate

The unravelling CLICO Mess has the potential to reshape how business is done in Barbados and possibly the Caribbean. For the transformation to occur the Fourth and Fifth Estates must play a lead role. The facts of the this case must be presented to the public in an unbiased manner.

The political class in Barbados is in cover-your-ass-mode but here is some of what we know about the CLICO Mess so far:

  • If the Late David Thompson was alive he would have to answer a few ‘hard’ questions, for example, why did Thompson & Associates generate an invoice for 3.3 million dollars which a forensic report suggests Leroy Parris was the beneficiary?
  • Both political parties have contributed to the weak regulatory framework which governed the insurance industry in the pre-CLICO British American collapse period

 

  • Why did former Prime Minister Owen Arthur ignore a cease and desist order issued by the Supervisor of Insurance to CLICO?
  • From a cursory examination of information in the public domain President of CLICO Barbados engaged in expansive decision-making which bear thorough explanation
  • Why have prominent and learned professionals [Leslie Haynes QC, Tony Marshall, Dr. Basil Springer, Woodbine Davis, Anthony Ellis, Dr. Frank Alleyne] who performed as directors of CLICO companies renege on their fiduciary responsibilities?
  • There is the appearance of a conflict of interest by Patrick Toppin as one of the Deloitte’s judicial managers given his past role as receiver for Plantations Holdings, a subsidiary of CLICO Holdings Barbados or CL Financial (not sure)
  • Although anecdotal there is the belief that CLICO International Life and CLICO Holdings Limited funded both political parties with the DLP attracting the lion’s share
  • The incestuous relationship between government officials and CLICO e.g. Thompson and Parris wives invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in a company named MAFA. Minister of Finance bought a car from Leroy Parris, Parris and wife seen sipping from long glasses in Sandy Lane’s Box at the Garrison on Gold Cup Day in the company of Minister Chris Sinckler. Prime Minister Stuart referred to Parris as his ‘pal’. What about Senator Jepter Ince, a former CLICO Executive who headed the poorly performing CLICO Balanced Fund, became Chairman of the NIS Fund, is a parliamentary secretary and appointed DLP candidate for St. George North
  • The Nation newspaper’s agenda, June Fowler, head of BIPA and former employee of the Nation newspaper. Deloitte’s Forensic Report is conveniently leaked to the Nation before Prime Ministers and other key players. The Court under whose direction the Judicial Managers function should order an investigation!
  • Tony Marshall, a former director of CLICO and until last week Chairman of the NIS Fund, the country’s most important fund.
  • Who is Mara Thompson?
  • The role of the External Auditors through the years and in recent years PWC – is it true that Marryshaw of PWC is a board member of the BTA?
  • The need for transparency in decision making by financial regulators (insurance). The public must be told if an insurance company has contravened the regulations

The list is not meant to be exhaustive but in summary Barbadians need to wakeup and resist ‘the political manipulation of minds by the political class’. The CLICO Mess exposed the financial ignorance of Barbadians. Who wants to open fixed deposits with an insurance company? (An EFAP is no more than a cash deposit dressed up). Do Barbadians still invest cash in Brydens and Cave Shepherd?


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. F#ck … heard it all before. Look for arguments sake when Pine Hill Dairy was about to be taken over by a company of similar size without a dollar changing hands except to the overseas share holders, thanks to the NIS fund, no lawyer of public merit would step forward to defend the interests of the minority share holders, farmers and employees siting conflict of interest. When it was all over this Mapp woman (then head of the SEC) as mentioned above became conveniently unavailable haven chosen to take a leave of absence and avoid the wrath of the concerned group. What a f#ck she is, and still continues to be in the mix.

    Neville Nicholls …my God!

  2. Observing AND waiting Avatar
    Observing AND waiting

    Yup. One big hard kick in d arse


  3. Sir Neville has since been replaced by Frank Alleyne as Chairman.


  4. David .
    Barbados is an incestuous society. There is a professional class structure created by our “elitist” High School system starting with the eleven plus.

    Every student of every secondary school who has become a Lawyer,Doctor,Chartered accountant,Company CEOs is related to or is a friend of other professionals.

    In a small country like Barbados it is difficult to have enough “degrees of separation”.

    The court system is the only place where I believe “Judges” are not influenced by their relations and associations.

    However I am disappointed that pure unadulterated greed has created this monster called Clico and I am truly sorry for the medium Income people who have lost money and whose pensions are in jeopardy.

    I don’t care about those whose losses mean they can’t buy a new BMW or Benz but the Teacher or Civil Servant who had planned to retire and now will have to get a part time job or live an austere lifestyle.


  5. Hants
    “The court system is the only place where I believe “Judges” are not influenced by their relations and associations.”
    You believe … Well that’s alright then, as long as you believe it its fine with me… I feel at ease now thnx.

    But you must also know that it is “pure unadulterated greed” that fuels the likes of the principals of the Forensic Audit team (the Judicial Managers), the political parties and the public servants that chose to look the other way …


  6. @BAFBFP, “But you must also know that it is “pure unadulterated greed” that fuels the likes of the principals of the Forensic Audit team (the Judicial Managers), the political parties and the public servants that chose to look the other way …”

    I am inclined to agree but we have to be careful not to cast aspersions on the character of the innocents.


  7. Hants

    The only innocent person ’bout here is me hear … I am the onliest person that I prepare ta vouch fah hear ..


  8. I am in the process of taking a read of today’s Sunday Sun and have just come across an article by one Pat Hoyos who sets out to berate The Prime Minister of Barbados for failing to read a report of a forensic nature on CLICO. Hear Hoyos : ” When I heard Mr Stuart taking this tack on Wednesday afternoon , I nearly drove off the road . Here you have a Prime Minister proclaiming ignorance about possibly the most earth-shattering report prepared by an independent investigator on the most significant financial collapse ever to take place in Barbados not to mention the rest of the region .” By this time I have decided that is enough of Hoyos for me . This Hoyos , I understand , was a former publisher or some related top official of the Advocate and the Broad Street Journal . He should therefore be possessed of at least minimum literary skills and should be able to appreciate that all the Prime Minister was doing was expressing his total disapproval that that said report that was the work of ” an INDEPENDENT INVESTIGSTOR ” , according to Hoyos , could have been leaked and disseminated to the extent that the Nation newspaper , for which he writes a column , could publish the contents of the said report and the opposition spokesmen could be quoting from it BEFORE IT WAS OFFICIALLY PUT IN POSSESSION OF THE COURT BEFORE WHICH THE JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT WAS ORDERED and before it had become a PUBLIC DOCUMENT . That the said Hoyos , who is described as a publisher , can first of all see nothing wrong with this act of lawlessness is amazing . In addition , for him to proceed as though he expected the Prime Minister to send his messenger to collect a copy of the report , from God knows where, is even more astonishing . One would have thought that a person of his background would be better informed than Mrs Fowler and would so demonstrate it . But it would seem that supposedly literate persons have suddenly lost the ability to reason .
    I will repeat one more time what I have said before : the judicial Managers must rebut the presumption that they were responsible for leaking that report and until they do , their integrity is open to question . The Prime Minister of Barbados is only ONE OF THE FIVE REGIONAL PRIME MINISTERS who have pleaded ignorance of the report . Should this not be of significance to Mr Hoyos ? Or is he just another person acting in pursuance of some agenda in this CLICO saga ? When all is said and done it will be very interesting to see who will suffer damage to their credibility . What is very clear to me is that the Prime Minister is intent on protecting his ; we will , in the fullness of time , find out if Hoyos had in fact driven off the road as he was tempted to do and been unable to deliver of himself this diatribe , if his own credibility would not have been spared somewhat .

  9. David (not BU) Avatar

    leak or not leak… it is out there. be informed and get your ass a copy. does the fact that it was leak make the information in it wrong?

    you people are amazing.


  10. @An Observer. If Hoyos drove nearly drove off the road, I suspect it was for reasons other than what he misunderstood (either deliberately or through his own ignorance) the PM to say. And I suspect he wrote his article under the same influence. He really is an overweight, pompous horses ass.


  11. This extermely shocking and distressing CLICO DABACLE is at the stage where the PM has to get up off his backside and use his powerful office to get a copy of that report if it isn’t forthcoming and take decisive action,

    There are too many unanswered questions and over 40,000 Barbadians are in fear of loosing their livlihood .

    HEADS SHOULD ROLL!!!! to coin his infamous phrase….


  12. Many understand there is a process to be respected concerning how the matter of the interim report should be dealt with. Many also understand there is the political dimension which this matter commands. Bear in mind it is a general election approaching.


  13. The impact of CLICO and the way it has been dealt with (and is being dealt with) is more than sad. The true meaning of a can of worms being opened is facing this little island and its people in a major way. Apart from hurting those who put their confidence and all their money into this company in order to ensure a happy and comfortable retirement, the international arena must be looking at us with disbelief – all causing at the same time such horrid ramifications in so many ways. There is no doubt that transparency and action is required immediately so that Barbados can at least keep some sort of decorum and respect intact. But……

    If I was Prime Minister and a report ordered by me is ‘leaked’ out…then it was obviously concluded and ready for same… but I did not (for some strange unknown reason) receive a copy, I would insist from those I put in a position to have this report ready (a) accountability for the release of the report (b) request an immediate copy of same (c) ensure I read it from top to bottom (d) ensure it was the correct report and (e) hold an immediate press conference to tell the people that same had been requested, received and studied but whilst I was not able to make any comment based on the fact that the official report was not out, at least I wanted to let the people know I cared promising that this would be my priority. Last but not least (f) I would insist that an official copy be sent to me and I would immediately start the investigations so required by the so named in same said report having reported to the people of Barbados that this was being done. But then I am not the Prime Minister and cannot purport to be able to even think like him.

    *tears* for those who have lost everything.
    *tears* for this beautiful country.


  14. @Rosemary

    There is a lot in that you have written above. What is missing is the judicial manages operate under the direction of the Courts of Barbados.


  15. @David BU….and the Courts of Barbados who are they accountable to??? No one??? I am serious about this question because I do not know. And when I do not know I ask a question of someone who might. 🙂


  16. @Rosemary

    Under our system of governance the Judiciary operates as an independent body even though the Chief Justice et al are appointed by the executive (political) arm of the system.

  17. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @An Observer.. | March 19, 2012 at 1:27 AM |
    “Here you have a Prime Minister proclaiming ignorance about possibly the most earth-shattering report prepared by an independent investigator on the most significant financial collapse ever to take place in Barbados not to mention the rest of the region….. ”

    “I will repeat one more time what I have said befor : the judicial Managers must rebut the presumption that they were responsible for leaking that report and until they do , their integrity is open to question ………..”

    Dear Observer, It does appear as if you are seeing this matter strictly from a perspective of protocol and the canons of normative legal behaviour and process. Mr. Hoyos is a journalist and is writing a column expressing his views. He is NOT the Editor. He is entitled to criticise the PM and there is some justification for his criticism.
    This matter, in spite of it legal status and under the purview of the Court, also has a serious political dimension to it. The integrity of parties involved in this high stake scenario, including the judicial mangers, is very much under the microscope. And Mr. Hoyos has a right to express his concern about the double standards on display. The column writer is not the one who first started the political fracas and controversy by putting his ‘mouth in motion before his brain in gear’. The newspaper contributor is justified in questioning the volte-face attitude by the same person in the same forum regarding the CLICO matter. On the first hand we have a pompous politician getting up in the highest political forum and with an air of total assurance declaring that a private sector entity and its agents are properly managed, financially sound and requiring no special measures judicial management and all. On what basis was this claim? Where was the integrity in that well-publicised assertion? Was there audited financial information or were there reports carried out by technocrats independent of the same company to act as a basis for the ironclad position taken at the time? Was there an “Independent Investigator’s” report that was leaked to him to make such adamant expression of confidence and knowledge of the CLICO ‘facts’?

    On the second hand we have the same parties doing a “Pontius Pilate” and distancing themselves from the CLICO badly soiled linen that is being washed in public by claiming ignorance of information that has been in the political domain for a while. A week in politics is a very long time definitely rings true in this turn of events. Even his honourable colleagues (especially his greatest fan and most loyal supporter from the North) and indeed his respectable opponents on the other side could have whispered in his ears or “shout” across floor sotto voce as to not offend the Speaker that such dangerous statements were in circulation and the faster the source of this leak is plugged and the truth unraveled and presented to the Honourable House in a decent format then the political rumour mill will start grinding immediately much unlike our current sugar cane harvest.

    Unless the same maker of these bold assertions is prepared to stand up in the same forum and say: I got it wrong the first time on this issue. CLICO was not what it was ‘cracked up to be’ and I would outline my Cabinet’s current position when I am in receipt of an “official’ copy, peruse it and become seized of the “facts” and have digested any recommendations, especially those that might financial implications for the government or for the need to make any major legislative changes.
    Maybe this is what he meant by saying: “Once bitten twice shy!” But one also expects in the interest of fairness, integrity and respect of the law, that an appropriate explanation is forthcoming from the judicial managers for this apparent lack of care and perceived professional laxity in handling the security and confidentiality of such an important document.
    But the specific question to you, “Observer”, is this: Who is responsible for ensuring the Cabinet of Barbados and in particular the head of the Barbados government are in receipt of an official copy of the report on the findings recently conducted forensic audit of the erstwhile financially sound and well managed Barbados-based operations of the CLICO conglomerate?


  18. @ David.
    It is clearly understood that there is an election upcoming and the CLICO report will feature . But I will again invite you to consider that the LEGAL aspect surrounding the leaking of the report and the POLITICAL aspect surrounding the efficacy of the Prime Minister jumping into the fray before certain procedural considerations have been satisfied ARE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. This Prime Minister has clearly demonstrated that he does not think that one should act lawlessly or immorally because it would be expedient so to do . Would that more of our politicians take to this high ground ; the country could only benefit . It is my firm belief that time and circumstances will prove Mr Stuart right on this one . Dont take that man lightly David . Let his detractors be warned .


  19. @ Miller.
    This is a very well reasoned and balanced contribution . However I must admit that your analysis of Hoyos’ article has given his objectivity more credit than the article itself would justify that he be given . I have absolutely no quarrel with your own analysis . I do not perceive any hidden ( or otherwise ) agenda at the root of your reasoning . Peace my brother .

  20. old onion bags Avatar

    Tell me AGAIN FUNDY…what part of the galaxy you are really living nowadays.Last night at a BLP meeting in West Terrace, a copy of the Judicial Managers’ Report was … in the hands of Dr.Jerome Walcott the party Chairman..(by the way still in Opposition) This 34 page document like it all bout nowadays……someone proposed to the media present….that the PM’s copy go have to be in LATIN for him to see it…and READ it.or composed by Wordsworth to be worth his while
    Is that truly the answer…?

  21. Observing (and learning) Avatar
    Observing (and learning)

    A question should be asked. What is the duty of leaders (political / financial / other) in times of crises where people are ignorant of facts, uncertain, confused and waiting for promised solutions or at he very least answers?

    Regardless of protocol and procedure, leaders are called to greater purpose and obligation and at times must exercise discretion in the achievement of their objectives and the motivation of their people. Reliance only on documented processes and incontrovertible facts does not progression, satisfaction or confidence make. Leaders by virtue should have the confidence of their people or at the very least respect at heart.

    Observer is correct that the JDM’s and whoever else got it totally wrong procedurally and yes it may come back to bite them and spoil any coming resolution. The reality is though, that having got it wrong, information is out there, people are more afraid and clueless and the possible spectre of political ramifications and integrity breaches blow across the length of breadth of Barbados and our ruling government. Given this, what then should our leaders do? Claiming ignorance of the facts isn’t enough. Promising resolutions in the “fullness of time” isn’t enough. Hiding behind technocrats after making bold ministerial pronouncements isn’t enough. This is not a call for an answer or a resolution, but a call for a statement. One that implies understanding of the real pressures persons are facing as a result of this, a continued pledge to get to the bottom of it, satisfactory resolution or not, and a blunt, candid conversation on where we are heading and where this will impact us.

    Often our leaders are quick to talk, brag, boast and pontificate on glorious platitudes and salacious innuendo…yet, when it is needed most, they are quiet. Whispering where they once walked shouting. Dodging where they previously dived in. Leaders must lead in the good and the bad. Communicate the wonderful and the sad. Inspire hope in both the darkness and the light. CLICO or not, GEMS or whatever, checque or jaguar, the people deserve better.


  22. @observing

    Eloquently put, we have concurrence.


  23. The PM is standing on moral legal and etical and for that reason he should stay away from being caught in the dragnet of political one upmanship and high drama. thoae in the BLP choir who don.T like it “so what” none of wunna gonna vote for him anyway so the hanger ons of the BLP could do all the political posturing wunna like the PM don,t have to answer to you. the Clico debacle is of a sensitive nature and should b treated with diplomacy and not as tabloid news, gossip and halftruths


  24. Further it is interesting to note that the PM in response to his position of not speaking to the report during the debate of the Estimates last week told Barbados anyone who is offended by his position – which has merit in observing protocol – can stay offended. The comment reminded the BU household of Sir Erskine Sandiford’s famous ‘like it or lump it’ statement.

    PM Stuart as a political leader and Prime Minister has to be acutely aware of his audience who are all potential voters. To attempt to alienate 30 or 40 thousand Clico policyholders seem to be folly but An Observer suggests there is a plan in the offing.


  25. @ David .
    I do not agree that the present Prime Minister’s position is the same as Mr Sandiford’s infamous ” like or lump it ” position . Even though I will agree with you that the political element of the report is of vital importance , WE CANNOT ENCOURAGE LAWLESSNESS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS . It is alright for Dr Walcott to wave a copy of the report ( as is here reported by OLD ONION BAGS ) at a BLP meeting , but that kind of acquiescence in an act of lawlessness by the President of the BLP may well come back to haunt him .
    I should also like to raise for the benefit of BU readers and contributors some issues emanating from two articles published by Attorney at law Mr Stephen Alleyne on successive Mondays in the Advocate Newspaper . Last week he dealt with the duties and / or liabilities of Directors : today he dealt with the duties of auditors of public companies as was decided in a House of Lords decision ( The Caparo Case ). The case emphatically establishes that auditors owe no duty to the company ; their job sets them up as independent scrutineers of the company’s operations . This in my view is in sharp contradistinction to the duty of the judicial managers who have a duty, as its appointed managers , to act in the best interest of the company. In this CLICO matter , the judicial managers are DELOITTE and the auditors are DELOITTE. in other words , DELOITTE IS AUDITING THE OPERATION OF DELOITTE .THAT CANNOT BE LEGALLY OR ADMINISTRATIVELY RIGHT . In a situation such as this any prudent public official like a Prime Minister should proceed with caution ; the reported act of Dr Walcott is nothing but a reckless act which can only have short term political benefits . Let these politicians be warned .


  26. @An Observer

    You last comment is easily understood but it is all about managing perception. Sir Richard could not have been more correct.


  27. @ David.
    Sir Richard might be a bad example to follow . His well repeated position might well have been responsible for his failure to rise to the rank of Prime Minister when all Barbados accepted that he was the natural successor to that office .


  28. @An Observer

    You observation maybe correct but Sir Richard’s observation has now taken root and has taken wings. It will all be unraveled when the PM and government lead a response. Time will tell.

  29. Observing (and waiting) Avatar
    Observing (and waiting)

    @Observer
    We know how you read the legal aspect of the issue, do you have an opinion on the political aspect, considering as you said that they are not mutually exclusive?


  30. http://www.nationnews.com/articles/view/arrest-warrant-out-for-former-premier/

    One day coming soon we may get people to account for the mess here.


  31. June Fowler on behalf of BIPA has responded negatively to the Governors suggestion that BIPA policyholders will not be getting 100% cash.

    Why is she surprised?

    Did she not expect that if the government is short of cash to pay Barrack that similar would obtain in the case of CLICO policyholders?

    http://news.barbadostoday.bb/barticlenew.php?ptitle=Short%20on%20cash&article=15252&pdate=2011-08-31


  32. @ Observing ( and Waiting )
    it is my view that the political aspect of the CLICO affair will have its greatest impact OVER THE SHORT TERM . In fact it is having its greatest impact NOW .The longer the saga continues and the longer the Prime Minister takes before calling an election , the greater the likelihood that the LEGAL aspect will take control . In the meantime let us both keep observing . Peace my brother .


  33. @ David{ not BU}– To your question which is Does the fact that it was leak make the information in it wrong the answer is no,but it is very hard not to agree with Observer.Here without much effort one can find many who clearly know better,permitting their political persuasions to influence their line of thinking.At the end of the day barbadians will continue to suffer at the hands of the Politically Connected.
    TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
    How do you classify as sycophantic rantings,the posts of CCC yet with velcro laced fingers you cling to a certain party’s printed doctrine?How does the exposure of flaws in the character of one absolve another of responsibility when both would have taken that sacred oath?How do you love any man more than you love your land?Like everyone else I am just asking a simple question.


  34. @ miller
    “On the first hand we have a pompous politician getting up in the highest political forum and with an air of total assurance declaring that a private sector entity and its agents are properly managed, financially sound and requiring no special measures judicial management and all. On what basis was this claim? Where was the integrity in that well-publicised assertion?………………………………

    miller,
    I am convinced more than ever before that the dead king could give that bold assurance because he was intimately involved with the running of that company. My legal friends tell me that he hardly practiced much law, his then legal partner did the work and claimed his share of the profits all the while DT practiced his blood sport politics. The dead king was never a worker hence when he became PM, he was the first excutive PM, so said Peter Wickham.

  35. Observing (definitely not to be confused with observer) Avatar
    Observing (definitely not to be confused with observer)

    @observer
    Thanks for the clarification. One might argue though that 9 months politically is very short term, while recognising that the legal unit of measure for time is usually years. Given that reality it may be understandable to see why there’s a call for a more political approach to the matter, especially considering that time may not provide enough wiggle room nor afford the opportunity for a desired legal resolution that matches the socio-political objectives of the ruling party.

    Legally right isn’t always socially or politically correct.

    Just observing.

  36. Don't ask me Avatar

    Is the DLP going to call elections if no one pays for this mess, apart from the taxpayer?

    They have obviously decided to fall on their swords in the interest of the powers that be.


  37. Did anyone see the MOF on DLPTV tonight, how he get so big, he looks in terrible shape physically.

  38. old onion bags Avatar

    Parliament FOOD boy ..Parliament food …he stocking UP

  39. PM call elections now Avatar
    PM call elections now

    Expect elections to be called before the CLICO and Barrack Construction issues are settled. No point in allowing the BLP, if successful, to have an easy start.


  40. Not Ben-Hur….it go be hold on to the end…wild horses or not….me at the epitome of my lime light and you want me do what.? You can call.. and I will answer…. with dispatch…You don’t know is my cousin..

    8 months to go ….suck salt or not..


  41. old onions,

    I am hearing Fumble may go in October, what are you hearing? Time is running out on him, he will be boxed in anyway you look at it.


  42. 2013….my friend….bets on….shame like it don’t count..


  43. 2013…my friend..bets on…..shhhhhhhhhhhh


  44. Will be interesting to hear how the Governor of the Central Bank explains his recent statement on the CLICO Mess. The Central Bank is the bank of the government and its exchequer should have a better idea than most the financial health of the country’s finances. Governor Worrell’s willingness to be vocal on topical issues is reminiscent of a former Governor who did the same under Tom Adams, Sir Courtney Blackman.

    The question to be answered however is whether the good Governor ignored process and protocol with his announcement that CLICO EFAers will not get 100% cash.

  45. old onion bags Avatar

    While he is at it …he could ask the Statistical Department or survey the man on the street for a true true UNEMPLOYMENT figure now that RedJet workers, Knights Limited workers and soon to be LIME workers on the bread line….sounds more like 15 % or more.
    Imagine ..a man yesterday in Bridgetown …stage his own protest …for a job…this is what bout hay coming to…..not like Greece nah..

    Islangal’s Fool me once…


  46. I remembered the Jackass saying, “CLICO is SAFE”. Don’t be surprised if nothing comes out of this, we bajans are a docile people. We keep supporting these overpriced big businesses and feel proud doing such…until we left the items on the shelf to spoil and take by our money from the banks…we will be financially raped till kingdom come.

  47. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ old onion bags | March 20, 2012 at 8:39 AM |
    “………. sounds more like 15 % or more.”

    You better jack it up by another % point to reflect the soon coming Almond Resort closure unless the NIS comes in as banker and godfather investor of last resort. One thing is certain, those T&T hardheaded business men aren’t going to continue to bankroll Bajan workers. As far as the private investors and foreign owned commercial banks are concerned hotel & tourism investment projects are sick and decaying animals not to be touched even with a $60 million barge pole.
    BTW, ole onions, what is the state of play regarding the Four Seasons project to be restarted since September 2010? The investment project guru doctor A P- having overseen the disbursement of US $60 million guaranteed by this government and collected his ‘finder’s’ fees for arranging with the gold-diggers to scheme with politicians to empty the NI pension fund- has now done a runner on us. Is it true he has left the paradise project high and dry or does he have plans to return when the NI cash begins to flow down the spring garden way?

  48. Observing (not Observer) Avatar
    Observing (not Observer)

    @David and Observer
    Tennyson Joseph makes for an interesting read this morning. I don’t know his “stripes and allegiances” but it captures some of what has been said here over 3
    weeks ago.


  49. @ Hamilton Hill,
    @ David{ not BU}– To your question which is Does the fact that it was leak make the information in it wrong the answer is no,but it is very hard not to agree with Observer.Here without much effort one can find many who clearly know better,permitting their political persuasions to influence their line of thinking.At the end of the day barbadians will continue to suffer at the hands of the Politically Connected”.

    @Hamilton Hill,

    This report was submitted to the court on December 5, 2011. Obviously there was a “conspiracy” to keep the contents secret. So we must thank the Nation for revealing the sordid details. If it offends the worst PM this country has ever seen and the DLP, let them stay offended, using his own words.

    If the Nation did not get hold of a copy THREE MONTHS later, would we have ever known that it was submitted furthermore know what was in it. Let FUMBLE and Chris Sinckler continue to say they have not received a copy. They do not realise how stupid and incompetent they sound and look saying so.


  50. @observing

    If you read his previous article you would see he made mention of the blogs being the medium not afraid to raise the hard issues. A pity he has not found the courage like Dr. Robinson to enter the fray :-).

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading