← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

General Secretary of NUPW Dennis Clarke

In recent weeks the underbelly of the National Union of Public Workers (NUPW) has sadly been exposed on BU, the result of a vigorous election campaign. Whether it was the revelation that the membership of approximately 10,000 has reached a level of lethargy where a quorum of 50 to start the clock at union meetings is a struggle. An outstanding cellphone bill of $6,000+ by newly re-elected President Walter Maloney (why does this last sentence seem odd?).  The strange procurement policy of the NUPW used to purchase an Audi for General Secretary Dennis Clarke. A defunct National Council which appears to have devolved all powers vested in it by the Rules and Standing Orders to General Secretary Clarke and President Walter Malaoney. Last but not least among the issues is the ‘talk’ that a quid pro quo deal was hatched between government and the NUPW to trade public sector pay hikes in return for a building at Newton to house the highly touted buying club.

In can be argued the NUPW is one of the most influential unions in Barbados. It seems to control the poll in the public service and because a significant percentage of government expenditure is wages, we the public have a vested interest in how the NUPW manages its business.

One thing which has concerned BU coming out of the back and forth in recent weeks is the extent NUPW membership is disengaged. The current state within the membership means a small band of people have been able to co-opt the running of the affairs of the NUPW to feed their own narrow interest.

Indicative of a high level of disenchantment resulting in low moral is the saga currently playing out at the Customs and Excise Department. This is a department which is responsible for collecting government revenues as well as safeguarding our ports of entry from drugs, guns and the like. A Customs Department that is not motivated becomes a national concern given the configuration of threats tossed up by our brave new world.

The latest edition of CESS News (Customs & Excise Shop Stewards) paints a dismal picture of the industrial relations climate which exist between the stakeholders. Bear in mind the role of the shop steward in a unionized environment. Shop Stewards (NUPW) at the Customs and Excise Department have been stymied in their efforts to secure a meeting with the Comptroller of Customs who operate ‘from their Ivory Tower at the Barrack Building.’

Here is a list of grievances labelled  SERIOUS ISSUES TO WORKERS by CESS:

Training and development are serious issues to workers

  • Appointments
  • Rotation of staff
  • Access to overtime
  • Allowances
  • Security
  • Occupational safety and health
  • Access to customs areas
  • Arming
  • Qualification order
  • Overseas training

Sometimes it appears that our bosses are not too concerned about the above. It seems that management is not too concerned when:

  • Officers are acting for long periods of time and are not being paid
  • When you have a DC Admin, yet the officer in charge has not developed or implemented any programmes and initiatives new or old
  • Where officers are sent to work in areas but are not given the specialist training to do an effective job
  • When an officer is rotated to a point to show that those in authority have power
  • When rotation does not make sense
  • When management only visits when there is a crisis
  • When the union delegates always have to request a meeting

Management needs to come with plans and tell us what  their vision is.

It boggles the mind how the Customs and Excise Department can have serious issues which have been outstanding for years and yet do not feel motivated to participate at NUPW meetings to agitate for better representation. Isn’t the Customs and Excise Department several hundred strong? Customs seems to be a good place to start canvassing for names for those interested in invoking Rule 8c of the NUPW Rules & Standing Orders.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

84 responses to “NUPW General Secretary Clarke Needs To Represent Disaffected Customs Officers”


  1. @Caswell

    Are you familiar with this matter?

    Is there a link to be made to what is happening now?


  2. Caswell, you mention about Barbadians commenting based on ignorance, but any process can be examined validly, based on the process, without extraneous matters like alleged monitoring by persons connected to Pricesmart, as you have raised etc.

    Your reasons for objecting to the cameras, which you clearly did in your early posts, have now changed, as comments have replied and asked valid questions.

    You now say that there is no objection to the cameras, fine. So, we can move ahead and install the cameras, it is just a matter of agreeing the who supervises the cameras, excellent.


  3. Thank you Mr Franlyn for doing a good job stateing the position of the customs officers a position which is based on law .It is unfortunate that the union which represents the Customs officers is not forceful in representing the officers who pay their salaries . You made a valid point customs has a legal responcibility to monotor the the duty free shops. All shops wishing to become dutifree shops must apply to the Comptroller of Customs and satisfy ceatain criteria before Customs grants them that status. Jack Spratt totally ignores the point that you are making .And asks about customs officers and dutifree liquor . THERE ARE SOME OUT THERE WHO HAVE A BIAS AGAINST CUSTOMS OFFICERS and are quick to attack them and ignore the facts . The point that Caswell was making is that Customs have a legal responcibility to monitor the dutifree shops and should have access to the cameras . GAIA only interest is to receive the rent from those shops.Customs should be in charge of the Cameras at the Airport . GAIA is a private sector company which is servive lead and focuses on the facilitation of Tourist. Customs is a lwaenforcement agency which is over 100 years. Do you think g4 could operate cameras at st Anns Fort or the Central Police Station or the Airport Police Station ? The Customs is the Customs of Barbados we seem to forget that. Where else do you find a private sector agency monotoring a goverment law enforcement agency. It may be happening in Barbados to the Customs Officers . But it is not right. It is rediculous.
    With respect to the search of the lady at the AIRPORT. The public has be quick to condemn the Customs. Two lawyers have written articles in the media about searches with respect to the Customs Act. What about the IMMIGRATION AND THE POLICE. The immigration officers detain suspects .They have lockups . What about the plain clothes Police officers of the Drug Squad whose offices are in the same compound as the immigration and who work CLOSELY with the immigration. I am 100 sure that when this matter is over the GOOD REPUTATION OF THE customs officers will be maintained. Where are the article about searches with respect to the POLICE and the immigration act.

  4. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Crusoe
    You wrote,
    “Your reasons for objecting to the cameras, which you clearly did in your early posts, have now changed, as comments have replied and asked valid questions.”

    Could you or would you point out the earlier posts where I objected to cameras. That NEVER happened: read a little slower please.

  5. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    David
    Thank you, I was not aware of the ILO complaint. It was before I went back to NUPW.


  6. No problem Caswell, what is immediately noticeable is that this is a matter dated to 2005.


  7. Hi Caswell, I quote you here..”I am sorry if I did not make myself clear. Neither the customs officers nor myself has ever said that cameras should not be installed.
    The cameras should be under the control of customs for their safety.
    The cameras should not be pointing at officers when they are performing their duties.

    —————-

    While you have indeed not directly said that cameras should not be installed, you have said that the customs officers should not be recorded in the performance of their duties.

    That is in essence a rebuttal of the use of cameras, for it makes any ostensible placement, impotent.

  8. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Crusoe
    What is wrong with you: I don’t believe that anyone could be this silly.
    The cameras are to be in place for the safety of the officers, and to ensure that people entering Barbados do not breach security. How does focusing on officers’ writing achieve either of those goals.


  9. There are those who feel that the officers have something to hide . That is a simplistic position based on ignorance about Customs . The concern for the safety and confidetiality of Customs operations is not an issue . Why should GAIA have intimate details about Customs yet Customs does not have intimate details about them . So only Customs officers have something to hide . On several occassions drugs have been found in the departure area and the intransit area which ARE primerily patrolled by private and GAIA security and G4S. No agency is perfect. When you enter the court room are cameras and cell phones allowed there . Maybe we should put cameras in there to t beef up the security there. Should all areas be under camera surveillance? Customs have a right to monitor cameras in the areas they operate in . Each agency have areas which they consider restricted areas . TO ALLOW ANOTHER AGENCY TO MONITOR THOSE AREAS makes a mockery of the term restricted. No corporate specialist or HR manager can tell me anything about security. GAIA is an agency where its top mamagement are qualified in these areas . Their focus is to run an efficient airport facility. To increase passenger satisfaction . Its focus is to enhance Barbados tourism product. There is a conflict between tourism and security . One moment they are talking about Security the next they talk about tourism. GAIA is not truely a security entity but an impersonator in the security arena. In recent time the Airport has granted permission for the operation of a meet and greet operation in the restricted area. Ridiculous. This has been done to facilitate the rich and famous . So we have the VIP lounge and the meet and greet. This could pose further challenges to Customs security . But they have the ear of the politician.
    When you start wrong there will always be problems the authorities ignored the Customs statutory responcibility for Airport Security and sought to elevate the Airport Authority. The politcians in their ignorance. However the Customs Act has not been repealed and until it is repealed Customs Officers will keep on shouting…


  10. Crusoe, Customs Valuation rules speak to the need for confidentiality between the importer and the Customs . A Customs Officer should not divulge what has transpired, except for purposes of the law courts if requested to do so.. If an external agency has audio of discussions between customs and importer that constitutes a breach. If a cameras can zoom in on documentation presented and infomation can be extracted by a 3rd party that constutes a breach . If you have detained a drug suspect one would feel very uncomfortable that a 3rd party who is not an employee of the Customs has intimate details of the event .We have no control over who controls the cameras yet they have this advantage over us . Which could one day be to our detriment.


  11. @heavydrop: “A Customs Officer should not divulge what has transpired, except for purposes of the law courts if requested to do so.

    Accepted.

    @hd: “If an external agency has audio of discussions between customs and importer that constitutes a breach.

    Accepted.

    But… This does not nullify the argument for cameras (without microphones) and DVRs.

    Primarily, security cameras are there to be audited if something “goes down”. To be able to tell who was where when — not necessarily to determine who said what.

    And I agree with you that the cameras should not be so focused as to be able to read documents (such fine focus results in a very small area of coverage anyway). But they should be able to determine who was where at any particular time in any part of the secure areas (wide field-of-view).

    The problem I personally have with Customs being in control of the cameras and the DVRs is what if something “goes down”, and then the records somehow go missing.

    It’s happened before, as we all know.

    Might you (and Mr. Franklyn) accept the option that the CJ’s office have sole control and access to the cameras, the DVRs, and the associated data-sets at the airport and seaport?

    There is an old saying: “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” Literally translated as “Who will guard the guards themselves?

    I believe that when a guard knows they’re being watched, they will guard better. Or, at the very least, are less likely to guard worse and/or submit to temptation.


  12. @All… Just putting this out there because I don’t know the answer.

    Are the Immigration Officers (those we encounter behind short “bullet proof glass” both leaving and entering Barbados to whom we have to submit our passports) also represented by the NUPW?


  13. @All… And then a follow up question:

    Exactly who is responsible for outgoing security at GAIA?

    Who controls all those scanners immediately after outgoing Immigration before the passengers board the airplanes?

    (Sorry; I know this is a Friday. Immediately after a Prince has taken a Bride. But sometimes the serious should take precedence over the irrelevant.)

  14. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Christopher Halsall
    It is impossible to convince someone when his mind is already made up. It appears that whatever is explained, you return to your preconceived opinions.

    There are cameras all over the hospital for security purposes but you don’t find any in the surgery where the doctors actually perform their duties. The cameras are there in order to twart any breaches of security before the potential offender gets to the surgery and hurt the patient and staff.
    Similarly, cameras should not be there to spy on Customs and Immigration but to be used as a tool to ensure that the staff and others using the ports are safe. How would you be able to detect a potential offender who intends to cause harm to people using the ports if the cameras are focused away from them and pointing on the staff.


  15. @Caswell Franklyn: “Similarly, cameras should not be there to spy on Customs and Immigration but to be used as a tool to ensure that the staff and others using the ports are safe.

    To this we actually agree.

    But, going deeper, honest Customs and Immigration officers would be comfortable being audited.

    Please correct me if I am wrong.

  16. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Christopher
    Honest Customs Officers have no problem being audited. The problem comes when honest officers are photographed seizing drugs and the drug lords somehow get access to the images of those honest officers. The drug lords would know who to KILL.
    Taping officers performing their duties can potentially lead to them and their families being harmed. Already, Customs officers have been threatened for performing their duties dilligently. Now you want to identify them for those who do not already know who they are.


  17. @Caswell
    “The drug lords would know who to KILL….”
    ****************************************
    That is a fairly lame argument. it is well below your usual high level.
    Officers can be identified by the person being searched, by persons accompanying them, by other officers, etc etc- just as likely as by any misplaced video…
    Are you going to suggest that they wear balaclavas next?

    It is a challenging job – just like policemen, prosecutors, security guards, and miliary personnel.

    Get over it.

    If they are not up to the challenge then they should ask for transfers to the post office to sell stamps…

    The purpose of the cameras is to ensure that established protocols and rules are followed. This protects all law-abiding officers. …. and of course the records should be properly secured.

    …when we drive vehicles accidents may happen, and persons get injured and even killed – but would you argue for a ban of driving to avoid these possible accidents…?

    DRIVE SAFELY…. and keep the video records securely.


  18. “The drug lords would know who to KILL.”

    LOLLL so how come dem aint get kill yet after all dem drug busts? Bushie I agree dat is real lame from someone like Caswell.

    It might just be that corruption is so rife that it will expose too many people if cameras are installed.


  19. @Caswell Franklyn… Just for the record.

    I note, with interest, that you actually haven’t answered my questions.

    Might you (or anyone) speak to *exactly* who controls the scanners (body and hand-luggage) immediately after the outgoing Immigration Officers at the Barbados’ international Airport?


  20. Caswell Franklyn | April 28, 2011 at 7:48 PM | Crusoe
    What is wrong with you: I don’t believe that anyone could be this silly.
    The cameras are to be in place for the safety of the officers, and to ensure that people entering Barbados do not breach security. How does focusing on officers’ writing achieve either of those goals.
    ————–

    Caswell,

    What is wrong with you yourself? I have never mentioned customs officers writing, I could not care less. But, you have mentioned NOT focusing on customs officers, that they not be identified. I merely pointed out how ireelevant that argument is.

    Yet, you now focus on irrelevance and refuse to address that which I have rebutted, your ridiculopus argument that the customs officers could be ‘identified’.

    Of course they can, and the drug lords probably have a list, as we write, even without cameras, do you think they are stupid?

    I note you rush to call people silly, whatever, without answering the points given, when your points have been shown to be nonsense.

    Cameras should and will be installed. Get over it. And, if customs officers think that they cannot be identified without cameras, they are in cloud cuckoo land.That is a red herring introduced to avert the impending.

    Further, legislation should be implemented to bring customs officers under judicial scrutiny, where suspicion exists that one may be assisting illegal activities.

    Hence, in such cases the Police should be able to seek investigation of bank accounts, lifestyle etc.

    Too much has gone on for too long. Time it stops.

    Island Gal also has it right that corruption could be exposed. That is one of the reasons for cameras, not just security.

    Like it or lump it, they will be introduced.

  21. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Crusoe
    Where do you get your information. The installation of cameras at both the air and seaport had nothing to do with catching corrupt officials according to Government. They claimed that the cameras were being installed to prevent Barbados being blacklisted as a safe location as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York.

    You are also calling for legislation that is already on the books. Honest Customs Officers do not fear legislation designed to capture offending officers, as a matter of fact they welcome it.

    You should be aware that most of the cargo is not opened at the ports. So what nonsense are you talking? How can cameras at the ports detect Customs who are inspecting containers at business places? Are you advocating that a camera crew follow each and every Customs Officer when the go to inspect containers around the country?
    Governments sole stated reason for installation of cameras was NATIONAL SECURITY concerns arising out of the 9/11 attacks.

    If I can paraphrase the PM, It appears that there is also a galaxy of clowns out there jumping on the bandwagon of criticism of Customs Officers


  22. @Caswell Franklyn: “Governments sole stated reason for installation of cameras was NATIONAL SECURITY concerns arising out of the 9/11 attacks.

    But might this not be the only reason for the installations?

    A reasonable question.


  23. Just rambling but cameras or no camel ‘s rass money gotta mek, pepull gotta tek what duh cud tek

  24. Maxine Charles Avatar
    Maxine Charles

    Caswell come on leave the cameras alone. I believe that the customs officers including their manangement will have some say in where the cameras are placed and who operates them. The continued defence only breeds suspicion on the work of the customs officer and without any basis for it.

    We are aways fast to accuse our own of all types of wrong doing without proof. We seem not to recognise that we need evidence before starting innuendo and rumour.

    LEAVE THE CAMERAS ALONE AND GET MALONEY TO PAY BACK THE MONEY HE HAS ADMITTED GUILT.


  25. Please focus on MAmoney and Wedsite clarke ,we need a strong UNION, lets remove THOSE MONEY CROOKS .WE NEED A CLEAN UNION TO LOOK AFTER OUR INTEREST AND THOSE OF OUR UNBORN CHILDREN –IN AN HONEST MANNER AND EFFECTIVE MANNER .

  26. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Maxine & Robert
    It is the union’s role to defend Customs Officers but that function has been neglected for far too long. Somebody has to defend the honour of Customs Officers. We have a galaxy of clowns jumping on the bandwagon and giving the impression that all Customs Officers are crooks. I don’t believe that for one minute. They might be a few, but only a few so we can’t allow to be tarnished by the actions of a few.

    On the other hand your focus on Maloney paying back $6,500 is far too narrow. Check the other months: your heads would grow. Even that is negligible in comparison to the wastage elsewhere in the NUPW.

    Four years ago, the union recruited a not so young lady to do a staff audit of a relatively small staff of 28 persons. To date that process has not been completed but the lady remains on staff taking home in excess of $5,000 per month. Speaking with the other staff members, none of them knows what she does to occupy the day maybe except lunch and getting her hair done.


  27. April 27th
    Donald White promised to inform us if the president is harassing staff I am still waiting for the results of that investigation

    Bro Franklyn regarding the last entry May 1st. With all that we have read from you could it get any worst at NUPW. You were invited to enlighten us. But you are bring little pieces at a time. Why not reveal the full menu so we may be fully replete. Please tell us all unless there was a secrecy act. I do believe that you are not a member of the fraternity


  28. unsure

    there is nothing to wait for
    you can get up and go and find out what is going on

    wuh yuh waiting fuh ?


  29. The caption of this article I believe is so misleading…. Clarke cannot represent anybody. Bluntly put he is inept and frankly stated, unable to represent neither man nor animal


  30. why clarke remains then ?

    people aint give two hoots
    too many females in the system
    you need some men to fight
    women gossip and lift their skirts to solve problems
    men back their shirts and fight for issues
    give me men
    I hate working with women–too much maliciousing and minding of peope’s business instead of working to better things. and a woman boss! too hard on women –actually to hard on everybody !

    cuss me !


  31. I wonder where these cameras will be installed ,in the search rooms where paxs are stripped search remember the word privacy and under the customs law these conversations are to be between two parties no third party to be involved the only person to have access to the cameras and data should be customs, the law is clear ,the office where the guns and ammunition are stored or in the lockers where the bags are stored please enlighten us, and who will mann the said cameras ,a private security or customs .I hope they know what they are doing.


  32. Tina only those on the inside can give the truth or most of the truth. Even if and when there is a Special Meeting things of such will not be discussed but we want to know that situations we government workers complain about are not perpetrated and condoned at the institution we look to for representation. I heard about the situation where Maloney TRIED to embarrass the employee and the executive just sat there. Especially the one who return to bring order back to the Union. You shouldn’t expect anything from the ‘MaMoney follower’ and excuse the others who are new and the fourth timer who has nothing to offer

  33. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Unsure
    The situation is far worse than anyone on this blog has disclosed so far. My revelations to date are only the tip of the iceberg of corruption that exist at NUPW.
    I believe that the call for a special general meeting to deal with the phone bill is short sighted. NUPW needs a forensic audit and an enquiry into the day to day operations of the union. That should be the focus of the members right now. I am sure that members would like to know about the wholesale theft of Medicare funds, some of which have gone into building apartments for rent and not for the union.


  34. NUPW needs to be torn down and rebuilt it seems
    Either that or accept and live with the crap !
    This situation seems to be totally whack !

    It seems There is no coming back
    hack !

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading