
We intended to advise the BU family of the good work which BU family members ROK, Chris Halsall et al continue to do on behalf of the people of Barbados. In light of the recent news concerning the severing of 116 employees from LIME how could we not add a few words about our favourite company.
The Fair Trading Commission recently announced the list of 10 Intervenors who have complied with the requirements under the Procedural Rules and have been granted intervenor status to participate in the review of electricity rates to commence on 7 October 2009 at the Lloyd Erskine Sandiford Centre. At the top of the list is Barbados Association of Non-Governmental Organisations (BANGO).
Although the the rate review is scheduled for 7 October 2009 several procedural matters start from August 7, the Intervenors will be kept busy doing the people’s work. We take this opportunity to thank the 10 civic minded Intervenors.
Sadly the re-emergence in the news of LIME, formerly Cable & Wireless sending home 116 employees at the height of a recession again brings into sharp focus the role of the FTC. Rulings by the FTC in the recent past has seen C&W which has a monopoly of fixed-lines in Barbados generating huge profits. Despite a good bottom-line over the years C&W formerly LIME has been relentless in sending home rank and file Barbadians while the executives continue to rake in some of the highest salaries in the Southern Caribbean along with bonus payments.
Union Boss Sir Roy has bleated to the media that he has given an ultimatum to LIME to withdraw a letter sent to the employees. In his opinion LIME has violated the terms and spirit of Protocol V which has been sanctioned by the Social Partnership.
Is there an echo in the house? Have we not heard Sir Roy issuing an ultimatum to the Sandy Lane/Royal Shop people before? Did something happen?
In our opinion three issues burn brightly:
-
Union: The Barbados Workers Union has shown a weakness to date when negotiating with LIME. Remember the closure of the Contact Centre which was not suppose to happen?
-
Profit: While shareholders want to protect profits where is the corporate responsibility? Barbados is a market which has served C&W well over the years and continues to do so. What are the C&W board members thinking? Are they on the board to only rubber stamp the decisions made in London?
-
Employees: Lastly, how can the relevant players ignore the inhumane treatment meted out to the severed employees. Employees were informed of their departure in the most insensitive of ways.
If there is a Protocol V which guides the industrial policy for Barbados why is there such ambiguity regarding its interpretation?





The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.