← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Former Prime Minister Owen Arthur

Leader of the Opposition Mia Mottley issued a Press Release over the weekend which strongly condemned a recent position taken by the David Thompson led government. CEO’s and other political appointees at statutory boards are now expected to offer their resignations should there be a change in government. This position has created heated discussion in Barbados and in the Bajan blogosphere. Many on the government side have questioned the sincerity of Mottley’s position. One such person is Ruedon Eversley, a former Editor of the Advocate newspaper who was literally chased out of that job by former Prime Minister Owen Arthur. It is well known on Fontebelle that both newspapers parted company with thousands of dollars to Arthur and others of his government just to keep the “peace’, ooops it extended to River Road as well!

At the request of Reudon Eversley we have published his article in full. We have to say that if half the things mentioned in the article are true, it is not only an indictment on former Prime Minister Arthur but also on the people who surrounded at the time.

EVIL AS HELL THE LOT OF THEM

Reudon Eversley

The long dark night of the BLP has come to an end. May Barbados never see the likes of it again. By the way, I want to encourage other Barbadians who were similarly targetted by the BLP because they were Dems or were otherwise affiliated, to tell their story. Barbadians must get the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. It must no longer be kept under the carpet. So Mia Mottley is calling for justice for BLP supporters. Why didn’t she call for justice for me, when I was editor of the Advocate and was being persecuted almost on a daily basis by the BLP?

The full story of how I was treated by the Barbados Labour Party has not been told but I will do so one day and Barbadians will see what an authoritarian government we had. How we were on the brink of dictatorship because when the press is attacked and bullied into submission, freedom is always in danger.

Some ill-informed Barbadians said I was too big for my boots when I reported Owen Arthur to the World Press Freedom Committee. If you do not stand up for yourself, no one else will. If they only knew what was happening to me, they would have been in full agreement. The media in Barbados were afraid of carrying the story. They apparently did not want to experience the wrath of the BLP.

How many Barbadians know, for example, that the BLP complained to the Advocate’s management because I refused to eat their food at a media luncheon to launch their 1999 general election campaign? As a result, I was threatened with dismissal. Well, I sought legal advice and was prepared to sue the Advocate for breach of my human rights so they backed off.

Let me say that the then CEO of the Advocate Mr Metzgen was a decent man who recognized what was going on and tried to defend me. I cannot say the same for certain members of the then Board who seemed more eager to please the BLP than to defend their employee – see supporting documents submitted by Reudon Eversley.

Why would I want to eat from the BLP ? Their yardfowls used to leave the most foul messages on my voicemail, telling me they are going to get my … you know what .. out of the Advocate because I am a Dem. They could have easily poisoned me had I eaten their food and I certainly was not going to expose myself to that risk. I have my children to live for.

The BLP wanted someone else to be editor of the Advocate. I never asked why the person in question did not get the job. I knew I was chosen on the basis of my professional track record, qualifications and vision. Systems Caribbean Ltd., after interviewing a short list, recommended me for the job. And, let me say this, without blowing my trumpet, the Advocate made a dramatic turn-around under my leadership. The record is there.

I have a copy of a letter which Owen Arthur personally wrote to my chairman. I have kept it so that my grandchildren one day will see how this man tried to take bread out of my mouth. And I had done nothing wrong. He called my office one morning hopping mad. I told him I had just come in for the day and had neither pen nor paper in my hand to take notes of what he was saying. His letter, claiming I was disrespectful, said I told him I was taking no note of what he had to say. Different meaning!

When all the crap was happening, I spoke to a certain well-connected BLP person and he told me they would have a problem with me because David Thompson is my friend. Imagine that? In fact, he even went as far as to tell me that I was on the phone in my office talking to David Thompson two days before, which was true. Talking to David Thompson was obviously a sin in the BLP’s books. Now, the person could have only found out this information from two sources: either the BLP had someone in the Advocate’s newsroom who was spying on me and reporting back to them or they had my telephone bugged.

I will have more to say later and it will make uncomfortable reading or listening for Owen Arthur. I will relate an experience which convinced me beyond the shadow of a doubt that Barbadians had made a grave mistake in choosing Arthur as their leader. He should know what I am talking about if he remembers a certain phone call he made to the Advocate one day.

The BLP is now demanding the justice they denied others. But they are getting a good deal. A well-known BLP person was recently appointed to a senior post at a statutory corporation which the BLP had refused to give that person. That would have never happened with a Dem under a BLP government. But I will say this: David Thompson is a gentleman – has always been. He has treated them all with decency and fairness which they did not show to Dems when they were in power.

After I was forced to leave the Advocate, I could not find work in Barbados. I had to go overseas to earn a living to feed my children. I applied for a job at a government institution for which I was perfectly suited. I was invited to an interview but I was warned it was just a sham. My source told me that a certain person said I would never work in Barbados as long as the BLP was in power. I called up the HR person at the organization in question, told him to withdraw my name and keep the job because I didn’t need it as I had a better one overseas. A BLP yardfowl even saw me at a public event overseas and remarked, in front of everyone present, that the BLP had made a “refugee”. Incredible but true.

My respect for David Thompson grew immensely during this period. You know why? He showed me his human side. He would call me quite regularly – not to discuss politics – but to enquire how I was doing. That meant a lot to me because you know who your real friends are, not when you are up, but when you are perceived as being down. This is the quality person who today is the prime minister of Barbados. It gave me great pleasure to work for him in the DLP election campaign in January as Communications Director and to have played a role in rescuing Barbados from the clutches of the BLP.

I have told half of the story. The best is yet to come. You do not have to like me personally but, on the basis of what I have shared with you: Wasn’t I denied justice by the BLP? I am a citizen of Barbados – certain foreigners were treated better than some Barbadians by the BLP – and the Constitution of Barbados gives me the right of freedom of association. By associating with the DLP, I broke no law but the BLP government targetted me.

But you see, the BLP always believes they are entitled to special treatment. Other people, however, can be treated like doormats. I wish them well, personally, but may they remain in the political wilderness for a long, long time to reflect on the evil things they have done and to repent for their sins. Perhaps the BLP was hoping I would have buckled and come to them on bended knee, like how some persons did, to beg them for a pick. If they were, they would have waited in vain. I would have preferred to die with my dignity than to debase myself by doing such.

Further, I knew the God I serve would not have allowed it. God is good! God is great! I thank my greatgrandmother for my Christian upbringing. During those dark BLP days, it served me in good stead. It gave me the assurance that with patience this too would have passed, that the BLP would not be in power forever and that they would eventually fall in humiliation. Secondly, my Christian upbringing assured me of my ability to survive once I believed it was possible. “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.”

I expect certain BLPites on this blog will respond in their usual nasty way by going into the gutter because they can never face the truth. The truth always hurts. Going down in the gutter is not for me. The gutter is home to centipedes, slugs, cockroaches and other types of vermin and I am not at their level. Others however are free to make that choice through their behaviour.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

193 responses to “Former Editor Of The Advocate Newspaper Tells Of Victimization By Former Prime Minister Owen Arthur”


  1. Dear Bush Tea:

    J regrets to inform you that J is old and fat and troubled by chronic non-communicatable diseases and is therefore unable to partake of the joys of Fore Day Morning.

    But J remembers the “good old days” and wishes the Foreday Morning Revellers well.


  2. Dear Reudon:

    J has been around for more than 50 years, J expects to be around for another 50+ years.

    J spent far too much time studying history. If J had studied marketing or accounting instead J would not now be catching the ZR vans.

    That said I now make the cast against Denzil, Glyne and Mia’s Uncle Elombe

    Just because Denzil did it.

    Just because Glyne Murray did it.

    Just because Mia’s Uncle Elombe did it.

    Just because you did it.

    Just because my son did it.

    Just because I did it

    Still does not make it right.

    If we all did it then all of us are wrong.

    As your grandmother taught you and as my mummy and daddy surely taught me 4 wrongs do not = right.

    I understand that newspapers started as party rags.

    I am quite familiar with the writings of Allan Fotheringham.


  3. I am missing something. Are there more documents?

    When did Arthur “savage” Eversley?

    We have a letter dated May 1998 of Arthur complaining to the Advocate and Eversley is not even the main point of contention. We know Eversley remained editor for quite some time afterwards. Are the more letters? How did Arthur exactly “savage” Eversley, why did he take so long to do it?

    In fact from being “savaged”, Eversley claims HE is one who was giving Arthur “anxiety”.

    Why does it takes guts for Eversley to claim “victimisation” now? especially when Arthur has been “stripped naked of power”?

    Surely it would have be braver to do it while Arthur had power??

    Explain please.


  4. Mr Eversley do you still fear you may be politically assassinated??

    Is this why some commenters think the telling of “your story” takes “guts” ?


  5. I think people need to realize that LIES always gets the headstart in any race and more often than not, leads for the most part but eventually, the truth catches up and overtakes it.

    The time has come for politicians to stop reacting to criticisms of them by members of the public, even if some half-truths are contained within those criticisms. Anytime a leader responds to trash, he is in effect saying that he is in some way guilty because why waste time to respond to nonsense?

    My primary school teacher always used to tell his students that small things attract small minds. We have to become more mature as leaders and desist from suing persons for perceived libellous remarks; a perpetual habit of the former BLP administration; especially if we know the things to be untrue. When persons constantly react this way they are in effect saying to the citizens that the remarks were true.

    I had admired Owen Arthur in the first two terms of his government but started to see an arrogant and autocratic style developing in his third term. For me, I didn’t care what he said or did during or leading up to the election campaign; he had to go.

    To substantiate Mr Eversley’s claim about Prime Minister Thompson being a gentleman, I remember distinctly, either the last or penultimate budget summation given by Owen Arthur, he lambasted Thompson with the use of some harsh words; calling him a dangerous whipper snapper.

    He said something about having a conversation with the late Errol Barrow and being told some bad things about Mr Thompson. In the recent budget response by Mr Thompson, I listened to Mr Thompson expecting him to return the favour to Mr Arthur and was pleasantly surprised to see what a vast difference his summation was.

    It is patently clear that Mr Thompson, cut from a different cloth, is a very remarkable person as regards to speaking assertively without descending into the toilet and also being very polite to his opponents even when they deserve a good ole cuss out.


  6. These facts should have been laid before the Barbadian public whilst hot, not now in some false feeling of retribution.
    ………………………………………………………………..
    My same sentiments. Too late and Reudon digging himself further by too much talking. Being an editor, Reudon should have realised he should listen instead of talking too much.


  7. david , can you release my posts?


  8. We know now how Reudon regarded Owen. And we know how he regards David.

    But how did Reudon regard the ordinary Advocate reader? You know those people in every town and village who put their dollar coins on a counter to buy an Advocate? Some of them are D’s and some of them are B’s and some of them like me change their vote from time to time

    How did Reudon regard the advertisers? Both corporate advertisers, and small occasional advertisers?

    How did Reudon regard the Advocate’s shareholders?

    How did Reudon regard the Advocate’s Board of Directors?

    How did he regard the other members of his editorial team?

    How did he regard the Advocates’s columnists?

    How did he regard the ordinary reporters on the beat?

    And he still has not explained how he justified the dismissal of Nalita when he felt that she might run for elected office as it is her constitutional right to do. Please explain Reudon.

    All of the above parties have rights.

    Did you respect the rights of all these parties?

    Or is this whole thing all about Reudon?

    Should Reudon have had

  9. Funny funny funny Avatar
    Funny funny funny

    You guys are too funny.
    You labast de man and say he talk too late, now you asking he to answer a whole lot of questions like if the man in an examination.

    Reudon, you dont need to answer. Dont fart pun dese jokers man.

    You survived, with out asking them for a little bit of rice. You got a job so you still not depending pun dese jokers for a little bit of rice so now DONT PICK YOUR TEET. Let them bray and bray and bray. If it was dem, they would still be hiding. They would not even have written as much as you did!


  10. Dear Funny, Funny, Funny:

    It was Reudon who brought his case to the court of public opinion

    So Reudon therefore must be prepared to face cross examination in the court of public opinion.

    If Reudon (and you) can’t take the heat of being publicly questioned, then he and you should keep your business out of the court of public opinion.

    Methinks that poor Reudon mis-judged and thought that nobody would ask hard questions, that everybody would say “look how poor Reudon get unfair” “look how Owen is a bad boy”

    But there was pettiness and bad judgement on BOTH sides.

    And “NO” I have never met Owen Arthur, nor David Thmpson either. Don’t belong to any party. Never belonged to any party.


  11. I agree with Funny. Owen is known as a vindictive man who didn’t like to be challenged. Many politicians (in his own party) and civil servants have felt his wrath over the years. Reuden has told his story in the only medium that would publish it after all I don’t think it would get pass the editor of the Nation or Advocate. In the USA the politicians often tell the “inside story” after they leave office with an axe to grind and one eye on their wallets, in Barbados they don’t have that luxury. At least Reuden is open about his differences with Owen and isn’t relying on whispers among the cocktail set.

    Politicians like all humans have failings, Owen is not above reproach and if he is so great the sum total of his time in office will surpass any criticism. I for one welcome the exchange of correspondence as it shows how petty politics can be even at the highest level. I am sure that there are many other stories which I would love to hear about Owen during his years in power. Are you out there Silent George……..

  12. Funny funny funny Avatar
    Funny funny funny

    I can not count the times I wrote letters to the newspapers in Barbados that were not published.

    BU & BFP provide a forum for self expression, and certainly much of what appears here would not be published in the local papers either.

    Few folk will sign their names to a post in this forum to be questioned in the manner that Eversley has.


  13. Here is my take on the Nation’s position on publishing letters:
    Priority 1: Anything that has the word Rihanna, West Indies cricket or Crop Over

    Priority 2: Any letter lamenting the state of the world from a Christian POV

    There are no other priorities, you place your bets you take your chances.

    Didn’t Margaret Knight say on BFP that the Nation published her letter on July 31/08 which she sent in April/08? I presume she dated this letter, can anyone tell me what editor would publish a letter three months after the fact?

    My mother always sends me fish wrapped in copies of the Nation; I always knew my mum was smart.

    The Advocate’s letter policy: Letters? What letters? You mean those pieces that of paper that we make paper aero planes with.


  14. I must say that I have very little sympathy for Mr Eversley. Unfortunately, I remember the very dark days of the Advocate under his leadership: the threats, his chauvenism and the arrogance and distain he displayed towards his colleagues. By contrast, Mr Denzil Agard, the former editor, may have been his opposite number in the political field, but he was a decent man who respected his colleagues and treated people with humanity and dignity. I hold no political strings to the BLP or DLP and speak merely as one who has experienced the “Eversley factor”. All I have to say to you Mr “Victim” Eversley is that people in glass houses should not throw stones! You too have caused people to leave the jobs they loved – and jobs in not so high places – and have shown scorn, arrogance and resentment for reasons only your small mind can comprehend.


  15. “For the cause that lacks assistance,
    ‘gainst the wrongs that need resistance,
    for the future in the distance,
    and the good that I can do”

    Reudon, you, as the editor, had the opportunity to make that difference.
    dmitting
    With your exalted alma mater’s training, you could have resisted government regulation of your editorials.

    You decided, for whatever reason to succumb to upstairs pressure.

    I can understand your capitulation then, but not your current tirades.

    You are in fact admitting to becoming a mouthpiece of government, to protect your job.

    That’s fair enough, if that is the society in which you elect to live.

    All your supporters on this blog must ask themselves”What exactly did we vote for in January?”

    If it was change, you are out of order blogging your admitted collusion with a potentially corrupt regime, much against your true conscience.

    What chance have we ever to implement ITAL when the editor of the nation’s secondary newspaper states publicly he sacrificed his beliefs for his paycheck.

    That is the true corruption of inclusion.


  16. @straight talk

    “you could have resisted government regulation of your editorials.”

    ————-

    Did Eversley present us with any evidence that the Govt attempted to regulate the Advocate’s editorials?

    Maybe it was true they did, but Eversley has not provided us with any evidence.

    Eversley had written a lot but little that stands up to scrutiny

  17. Georgie Porgie Avatar

    As a looker on………………..

    After the way that Eversley has been hounded in this thread on BU, it will be a long time before anyone will tell the populace on this forum of any of thier experiences.


  18. J has responded to that already : (see above)

    “it was Reudon who brought his case to the court of public opinion

    So Reudon therefore must be prepared to face cross examination in the court of public opinion.”

    ————-

    @GP

    If Arthur came here with his perspective should we leave him unchallenged as well?

  19. Barnabas Collins Avatar
    Barnabas Collins

    I try not to get embroiled in back and forth with other bloggers. I usually comment on the original article which is used to generate the discussion. But more and more I find it necessary to comment on something that I have noticed on this blog.
    I think it is totally unfair to mention persons by name when the writer is doing so under the purview of anonymity. This is a small society and when one makes unsubstantiated assertions of infidelities on individuals (non-politicians), some will see these as facts but more importantly these individuals have to work in Bim and will have no recourse to clear their names. We all have to live and work irrespective of which party is governing in the country. While it seems that some on this and other blogs are suggesting the absurd notion of dividing our country into B or D, the sane ones among us understand that such a suggestion would be divisive to our beloved country.
    Therefore, I would suggest that the administrator of this site should offer ALL citizens the ability not to have their names sullied by unsubstantiated and wild comments by some who find this practice acceptable. I am not trying to prohibit discussion but when making an assertion it should be substatiated by proof and not just a hunch or romour….

    Just a suggestion.

    BC


  20. OWEN ARTHUR IS A CLEVER MAN! IS HE A NICE MAN? I WOULDN’T BE FOOLED THAT EASILY! RUEDON IS AVERY DECENT GOD FEARING MAN, AND THE FORMER P.M TRY TO STARVE HIM. BUT THE STEPS OF A RIGHTEOUS MAN ARE ORDERED BY THE MOST HIGH GOD!


  21. I presume she dated this letter, can anyone tell me what editor would publish a letter three months after the fact?
    ………………………………………………………………..
    If an editor can wait 8 years to deal wil his own letter, what will you expect in 3 months?


  22. Dear Evanchef:

    In Reudon’s own words he applied for a job which suited him perfectly, but before the prospective employer could say yes or no Reudon called the human resources department and withdrew his application.

    How can it then be said that Owen tried to starve Reudon?

    By his own words Reudon told us that he turned down the perfect job.


  23. Reudon seems to enjoy portraying himself as a victim.


  24. But dear J, the interview was all set up just as sham to trick Eversley by the BLP !


  25. What I marvel at is these guys who have their political agendas to follow and don’t realise that at some point in time they would get burnt. Which every party is in power, persons from the other side feels the hurt when crunch time comes. Take it like a man, come back strong now but don’t try to regain what was lost or you would hurt theNow party.

  26. Wishing In Vain Avatar

    The Scout you missed the point by a mile, what he is showing the people of Barbados is the fact that Owing See Thru Arthur was a little tryant a dictator and a bully.

    He is awaking you to what Arthur was really like behind the facade of a caring lovable person he was nothing more than a scum bag ready to unleash his vile remarks at anyoner who opposed his wishes, not to be left out in this style is mottley who recently fired Mr Norman Barrow from a contract given to him to supply the sound system at their Southern Conference because he attend the Budget Debate in Parliament, now tell what breed of idiot is she???


  27. When accusations are leveled at someone, or their image lowered by the revelation of actions attributed to them, and there is no response, or attempted rebuttal, or the provocateur hasn’t being served with a writ, I usually have to conclude that all that have been said must be true.

    Ruedon has Owen’s lawyer been in contact with you? Does anyone know if Owen has responded to the charges leveled against him by Ruedon? What am i to make of Owen’s silence? 😀


  28. Does anyone know if Owen has responded to the charges leveled against him by Ruedon?
    …………………………………………………………………
    I see no reason to respond. If the documents are weak and unable to show Reudon’s point, it would be suicidal for Owen to respond. Reudon will have to bring a stronger case to the plate.


  29. Likewise Mr Hinds, where is Eversley’s writ for wrongful dismissal against the Advocate or his writ against the PM for keeping him out of a job


  30. Ruedon I am only a mango away. I realise that J. HAVE SERIOUS ISSUES. Don’t let him derail you, stay your course. let the truth be told!


  31. If Owing after didnt like you HE GOT RID OF YOU!

    I aint asking a boy a thing I telling you!

    to those who think that he was the sweetest since slice bread lol lol lol!

    WAKE UP AND GO AND PEE COZ WANNA GOT BE HALUCINATING!


  32. Dear Evanchef:

    If you can list “the issues” that you believe that J has I’d appreciate getting such list from you and then I can deal with those “issues”.

    Thanks.

    J

  33. Blackest Beauty Avatar
    Blackest Beauty

    Ruedon Eversley!!!!!!!!!!! Who the fuck cares about what happened then?
    Is this the best you can do ?

    Your writting reflects that you are a very “speightful” person only ladies begave in this manner. I am not favouring the Barbados Labour party, I will never favout the BLP, Howvwer I know you and I am very disappointed with your writting. Leave things like these in the hands of the Lord. He takes care of everything………….Open your eyes …..see…………beleive…………After all that Owen did to you, you are now standing again and you are standing taller than you were before…………….Behave yaself Rudy behave !!!!!!!!!!!

    Real Disappointed

    Blackest Beauty

  34. Someone said the 'BLP Stalwart' Avatar
    Someone said the ‘BLP Stalwart’

    Dear Mr. Eversley,

    I always heard that “the higher the monkey climbs, the more he shows his ass.” Evidently, you are quite a climber — having reached the top at the Advocate and being so close to the top now with your love for David. All I can say is cheers! Perhaps I should say watch your ass! Since that final bit of advice was never a problem to you, do you mind informing Barbadians how many lives you have ruined because of your willingness to to lie in bed with whomever you felt had the capacity to raise your ambitious claims for fame and fortune. You have always been a sell-out, and sooner or later, the praises you sing for David will become lamentations of victimisation once again. You are not worth the pen you write with, neither do you deserve a medal for bravery. Without being crude, do us a favour and rest your stubborn ass. The world is bigger than your 10 year charade and Barbadians need to hear a lot more on solutions to their everyday problems of battling food and energy costs. Write on these things! Your ass is now truly exposed.


  35. I think we should all watch our arses if Reudon’s around!


  36. The smear campaign obviously being used against Mr. Eversley is a weak strategy. All of Barbados know of Arthur’s autocratic approach to dealing with the media, just ask David Ellis.

  37. Someone said the 'BLP Stalwart' Avatar
    Someone said the ‘BLP Stalwart’

    Go ahead, tell me David? What will David Ellis say? Does he have a long epitaph and a never-ending song of lamentations just like Eversley? This does not sound like the Ellis I heard on VOB and Brass-Tacks. Stop fishing in a dry pond.


  38. I don’t support any political party but having known Mr Eversley at a professional level, I would suggest that his approach is no different from what you see as Arthur’s. There are four words which sum up Reudon’s character:
    1. Nasty
    2. Egotistical
    3. Vindictive
    4. Hypocritical

    …And I’m sure I could easily find 10 more!

    Reudon’s lamentation is simply a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

  39. Someone said the 'BLP Stalwart' Avatar
    Someone said the ‘BLP Stalwart’

    Sweet Pea, give me more, give me more. You do not need to give me 10, but give me more. Seems like we both know the charmless man that was more foul than feast.


  40. So we are all in agreement that both Eversley and Arthur are of the same cloth? Let is declare this matter a stalemate and move on then!


  41. Let’s just say that the “love note” pinned to the Advocate staff noticeboard one day summed him up! I believe it was written by a member of staff as no one seemed too bothered to take it down. I take it Reudon wasn’t in the mood for love when he turned up and saw it as he was quick to take it down. Ashame!

    Just for you Rudy XXXXXXX

    NOT !!!!


  42. I am new to this site but am very interested in hearing Mr. Eversley’s story, I do not reside in Barbados and have not for about 30 years. I lean DLP, do not have a particular gripe with the BLP. I do not know much about Owen’s Gov’t policies, liked the man but was a bit suspiciuos about some of his govenrment policies. It seem as thought they readily ignore the poor and lower middle-class sector except for when there are General Elections. I travelled St. Philip, St. John areas and the roads were in awful shape. St. George was a little better but bad none the less. I see politicians after their second term doing very well but the rest of the society (except for those closely aligned, directly or in directly to the politicians ) struggling to make ends meet. Then again that life everywhere. One is likely to believe Mr. Eversley especially if you harkenback to the Tom Adams days, is this behavior if true part of the BLP playbook/manifesto? I must also say that I was very pleased to see the B’s defeated in the last election. they feet had gotten for their shoes. Some of the BLP ministers behavior was in my opinion ROTTEN, particularly one female minister involve in a Christ Church project, as well as others. Quite honestly I had reach the point where I had very little respect for the government yet I did not dislike any of them personally. I am barbadian living overseas and depend on the media for most of my information.


  43. […] Then the BLP were kicked out of power and the Democratic Labour Party changed things around. Suddenly the full page government adverts started to appear in the DLP-supporting Barbados Advocate newspaper. Former Barbados Advocate editor Reudon Eversley published an article at Barbados Underground telling of how the BLP had him tossed from the newspaper and he called the BLP “Evil as hell the lot of them.” […]

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading