← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

haynesly benn

It is no secret that the BU household all look forward to the weekly musing of Lowdown ‘Dick’ Hoad. We admire this man who is able to merge intellect, common sense and humility. Qualities which many from our mushrooming middle class who feel that by earning $150,000 per annum, and they can afford to build a million dollar house, they have a right to walk on water and have their noses fixed permanently at 90° from horizontal. It matters little to our well educated middle class that the ownership of their houses will remain the property of the bank well into their senior years. Forgive the digression but we do get a little pissed at some people who feel that material trappings should be the criterion for measuring success and contribution to our society.

Earlier this week we highlighted the story of Barbadian Farmers Need To Get Their Act Together, & SOON!, a St. Lucy farmer who for two years running has had to resort to the media to get his produce offloaded. BU summarized his predicament as a matter of poor management. The farmer by his utterances in the media propagated the view that the government needs to do more to help farmers distribute their produce or words to that measure. Surprisingly the blog attracted some critical feedback, we got the distinct impression that we stepped on some corns! In retrospect maybe we were a little harsh with the farmer who is doing what he does best, that is grow food. His commitment to performing this critical vocation at a time in history when our snooty nose middle class has been educated that jobs which require pen pushing and cellphone toting are the more honourable professions to pursue.

This week’s Nation article by Lowdown has confused us. We are not sure if he is defending Sir Cow or using his familiar tongue and cheek delivery to make a bigger point. How can he defend Sir Cow who along with CLICO is a significant landowner, and at the same time knock Minister Benn who is shitting pink trying to find ways to feed the PEOPLE? Lowdown should know that the government has fielded severe criticism at its land use policy over the last 14 years, especially Greenland. We disagree with Lowdown at his willingness to deflect criticism from Sir Cow ‘moving the earth to please’ Williams to the David100 days has expired’ Thompson government.

Developing an agricultural program where producing food becomes part of the national strategic plan makes it a serious issue. With this in mind we must push the debate above the historical and parochial positioning of blaming the usual suspects. We will defend Minister Haynesly ‘want to feed the people’ Benn because he is a 100% upgrade on Erskine ‘do-little’ Griffith who surrendered at the onslaught of the concrete offensive led by his former government.

The success of the government and by extension Benn requires the support of the magnates and conglomerates in our country i.e. Sir COW, Sir David, CLICO and others. We are sure about one of the three…


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

31 responses to “Barbados Continues To Discuss Food”


  1. No body understands agriculture like Benn. This is a man who knows what it takes. He deserves our support. With Benn in the cabinet be sure that the use of our land will come under his eagle eye. He is a man who would resign in priniciple too so watch out.


  2. We Bajans have lost the art of encouraging the soil to produce a bounty. In travels abroad I have noticed people planting on hillsides, venturing deep into the jungle and trying to reap from what is best described as sand.

    In Barbados relatively large areas around houses are left idle, dismissed from the conciousness, soil which with a little care could produce crops. Some people complain of high prices in the shops, when a few seeds and a little attention could ease their burden… and we have the climate.

    We have taken to our hearts the “supermarket trolley experience” to push a trolley in the supermarket and grab items from a shelf means we have arrived.

    There is a notion that to touch the soil means backwardness, but in this respect we are out of step with the developed world. Travel across Europe and see people who take a pride in planting their own. Those who do not have land try to rent allotments and diligently tend them on weekends and evenings after work. They also take great pride in telling friends in the office I have grown those tomatoes myself.

    The world is changing and we must change with it or we will be out of step, we cannot plant everything it is true, but what we can, we must.

    Education is needed and the schools should be encouraged to change the inherited mindset of our children. The Government could help by printing advice on planting and implementing a distribution of seeds programme.


  3. This week’s Nation article by Lowdown has confused us. We are not sure if he is defending Sir Cow or using his familiar tongue and cheek delivery to make a bigger point. How can he defend Sir Cow who along with CLICO is a significant landowner, and at the same time knock Minister Benn who is shitting pink trying to find ways to feed the PEOPLE?
    ………………………………………………………………….
    David, Lowdown was speaking with authority regarding Sir Othniel vision for Kendall Plantation. Remember the NUPW boss made a swipe at Sir Othniel regarding him using a quarter of his Kendall Plantation to grow food, and he went on further to speak about the vast grassland. Lowdown defended COW rightfully, stating that the grass was to feed the horses and cows on the farm. He went further to state that with the increases in feed, it would be prudent and economical to grow grass to feed them. He even made an aside about himself using horse dung to generate power in his house.

    I wholeheartedly agree with his sentiments and dismiss the statements by the NUPW head and even Minister Benn on focusing only on COW’s effort to grow more food. What about his cows, sheep etc that we enjoy on our plates. Why was no mentioned made about CLICO’s ownership, or even the same Government massive land bank?

    This is where I have to draw the line David. Before we start blaming who might be at fault due to a high food import bill, we must empower homeowners and would be homeowners to devote a quarter of the property for food production. It seems that as soon as someone obtain a home, the first thing to be purchased is a whacker or lawn mower or a blower. Even the sourcing someone to cut the grass is high up on the agenda.

    So you see David, it is our lackadaisical attitude in priortising our needs instead of following the Joneses. So my respect to Lowdown on this one.


  4. Some months ago, someone said “Grow your own.”. People all over Barbados said then that he was talking foolishness.


  5. Citizen First doing backyard gardening which was suggested by Arthur is vastly different to what is required and what is being suggested on BU. There must be a national strategy to define how we will improve our agriculture to offset some of problems caused by the global turbulence.


  6. David,
    fair enough comment but part of that national strategy may involve getting people, especially young people, to change their tastes and eat foods grown locally. Backyard gardening may just be part of increasing our consciousness regarding locally produced food.


  7. Over to you Sen. Benn. You’re the perfect man for this crisis. A true St. Peter and C.P down to earth man. Always remain The Haynesley that I know, the St Peter seat will soon be yours.


  8. How will young people go back to planting when they cant cook? also the lifestyle of today makes it impossible to change and I mean impossible.


  9. Citizen First doing backyard gardening which was suggested by Arthur is vastly different to what is required and what is being suggested on BU.
    …………………………………………………………………….
    David, you are contradicting yourself, on one hand you are speaking about backyard gardening is different, yet you come back within a second and speak about a ‘national effort’. If every householder plants a few food crops that will equate to acreages of food. If I reap ten tomatoes and my neighbours each reap 5 to 10 tomatoes and 50% of the households across the island reap 5 tomatoes each. The overall savings would worth thousands of dollars.

    Remember the old days when your grand parents will give the neighbour potatoes and will get yams and a breadfruit in return. That’s what you call bartering which we need to re-implement.


  10. My computer is not retaining my sign in name, thus the ‘anonymous’ posting.


  11. Some months ago, someone said “Grow your own.”. People all over Barbados said then that he was talking foolishness.
    ……………………………………………………………………
    The last PM was not only talk he talk, but he was walking de walk by actually reaping food crops from the land. Surpriseingly, that was not the first time that he spoke about back yard gardening. He was in the paper over two years showing some potatoes he reaped.


  12. The DLP and BLP Governments that have been in existence over the years must be primarily blamed for Sir Charles being one of the largest so-called land owners in the country. Yet these parties would want to from time to time tell the poor and marginalized in Barbados that they really care about them when the vast majority of them are in dire need of land space in Barbados.

    Sir Charles could only now be making sport at the DLP and BLP when in donating 1 measly acre of land at Redman’s Village in St.Thomas, to the UWI, he was reported in the Saturday Sun, April 19, 2008, as saying whenever there is a some building constructed on the land that it must be named after Nelson Mandela, and that next to Jesus Christ Nelson Mandela was the greatest man in the world. What irrelevant and disgraceful nonsense from a babbling figure trotting on a pale horse!! The truth is that many years ago before being imprisoned Nelson Mandela had fought bravely against a very despicable and ungodly system in South Africa, wherefore, among other things dehumanizing to blacks in South Africa, some of the minority Afrikaan whites were the largest landowners, in stark contrast to a situation whereby the vast majority of South African blacks had remained landless and propertyless. Meanwhile, whites in South Africa disgustingly used some whitened image of Jesus Christ to help dehumanize Blacks. Therefore, it could only be that UWI has terribly insulted and offended our party by accepting land donated to it by this old greedy man, instead of helping to make sure that there is greater level of land redistribution in Barbados. Shame on you, Hilary!!

    Nevertheless, the truth is that Sir Charles could only do that to the DLP and BLP, two parties that have terribly failed the masses and middle classes of people of Barbados. For sure he could NOT have amassed some many acres of land in Barbados, if we were the government over the years. And, too, he could NOT have, in this case, been seen by many Barbadians to be making mock sport at our party and by extension the landless in this country!!

    PDC


  13. Who am I to say PDC …but the above comment was lucid, to the point and engaged the conciousness perhaps this form of delivery could be tried more often…but who am I to say, it is just an observation.


  14. How are we contradicting ourselves? We have never discouraged backyard farming but a sustainable approach to feeding the nation must be lead by government. hey have the lands and they have the incentives through subsidies. The masterplan must come from them.


  15. This week’s Nation article by Lowdown has confused us. We are not sure if he is defending Sir Cow or using his familiar tongue and cheek delivery to make a bigger point. How can he defend Sir Cow who along with CLICO is a significant landowner, and at the same time knock Minister Benn who is shitting pink trying to find ways to feed the PEOPLE? Lowdown should know that the government has fielded severe criticism at its land use policy over the last 14 years, especially Greenland. We disagree with Lowdown at his willingness to deflect criticism from Sir Cow ‘moving the earth to please’ Williams.
    ……………………………………………………………………………….
    BU take a bow. I am in full agreement. Lowdown is a clever scribe. His thoughts often run contrary to the bigoted crap we hear incessantly from his look alikes. He is the only one of his ilk I would consider voting for. But in this article he has gone back to the fold.

    Cow Williams should be brought to task. We did not elect him king of Barbados. He has deliberately acquired large acres of our land to be able to thumb his nose at the government and people. Haynsley Benn and Dennis Clark (NUPW) are correct in reminding him of his responsibility to plant more food. The Trinidad man from Arawak Cement Plant also rightly and frankly answered his selfish, greedy call to shut down Arawak. Kudos to the three of them.


  16. A farming plan for Minister Benn and Mr Clarke
    Published on: 4/27/08.

    PLEASE ALLOW ME to congratulate Minister of Agriculture Honourable Senator Haynesley Benn for his drive to encourage Barbadians to grow more food and to eat them instead of imported foods.

    I agree with this policy entirely, but I must censure the minister for using his position to take cheap shots at my brother Sir Charles Williams who I consider to be the most patriotic of Barbadians. I am sure that if the minister knew the facts as I do, he would not have said what your DAILY NATION of Tuesday, April 22, reported on its Back Page.

    Sir Charles’s brother Bizzy Williams has come to his brother’s defense. He in essence has written in a very long article which says to Minister Benn: Put up or Shut-up! BU welcome the constructive suggestion put forward by Bizzy to give 5 acres in the first instance and eventually all of the acreage he owns at Farmer Bim, Four Square St. Philip if they can come up with a plan to grow food profitably.
    there is a saying to beware of Greeks offering gifts. We say this because it is likely the government if agreeable would roll out more subsidies to agriculture. Then the question is who would benefit. The great dichotomy of the government is in a free market system the rich will always get richer.

    We wish Benn and Bizzy could get together down pun Lowdown Hoad patio drink some goat mile and come to a understanding. All this back and forth in the media is stressful.

  17. passing through south Avatar
    passing through south

    All the talk about agriculture and doing a little something for ur self in the backyard makes me laugh.When agrofest comes up everyone on and on about agricultre yet be involve in the field and you would see how many hurdles have to be passed over.I will give one example from my experience.Can you imagine government say the greenland live stock station is there to help farmers, haaa what a big joke.Can you believe it is suppose to help farmers get better quality black belly sheep for breeding,yet after having my name and also some other firends did the same on the list for 3 yrs we never got a call to come purchase any.After checking up i was shown a book with my friends name and told tha the got his share,at that moment i had my friend with me in the car and i asked him to come into the office and said ur name is there and they r syaing u got ur share.Can u imagine how shock the officials were when their lies blew up straight infront of them,they heads just dropped downwards.Even if you r called for an animal you are given some of the worse ones which are rejects,where as the bes tones are given to friends or the same workers take them home.And then they talk about helping the farmers and improve agriculature and livestock rearing on thsi island.oh what a joke


  18. Haynsley Benn and Dennis Clark (NUPW) are correct in reminding him of his responsibility to plant more food.
    …………………………………………………………………….
    People are getting confused with ‘plant more food’ as though it is the only agricultural product. Are not cows, goats, pigs etc a part of agriculture farming? Do you know that COW are concentrating more on the livestock aspect? Should you not direct the concept of grow more food to CLICO who are one of the major owners of land in Barbados? Should only one land owner be targeted at one person?

    We as a people are missing the point of food production because we refuse to release our partisan hats and look at ways of being food self- sufficient.


  19. BU says:
    “……….sustainable approach to feeding the nation must be lead by government. hey have the lands and they have the incentives through subsidies. The masterplan must come from them”.
    …………………………………………………………………….
    If you know that Government should be in the forefront of food production, why then are you harping that Sir Othniel should be in the lead by using a quarter of his lands for food production.

    Minister Benn is doing what he knows best, but he should not get caught up in land ownership and what the owner should do with his land.

  20. Bore dickey Two Avatar
    Bore dickey Two

    Like clockwork Bizzy Williams writing letters defending the indefensible his sibling the great Cow. I have long ago had it with these two self serving money collectors. Benn and Clarke’s advice to the self confessed largest land owner is sound and logical. Produce more food and less golf courses. Its the national responsibility of those to whom much has been given. Yes given.

    Around 1993 an acclaimed academic publicly announced the Cows , Bizzy’s and their kind were running a sub economy within Barbados’ macro economy. That academic is Sir Cow’s new found bosom pal Sir Hilary Beckles. Go figure. The economy within an economy notion is clearly borne out now as the Williams’ hold Barbados to ransom.

    Also what is their obsession with Clico? From where I sit I see CLICO as a counter weight to the sinister objectives of the Williams’ and their cronies.


  21. Both COW and Bizzy behave like children all the time. …. always picking at little things. Do they think themselves beyond criticism?
    …or is it that they see certain people still as ‘boys in the yard’ who are here to say ‘yes, boss’ and ‘right now, boss’.

    Every time somebody have a different opinion to them they in people face with their righteous indignation… bout how they have worked so hard… done so much for Barbados and Barbadians, how much they know etc… Leave that for Bush tea…

    What indignation what?!?

    man look…wanna is just two lucky boys who got breaks that many hardworking black Bajans could only dream of…

    The fact that the Williams boys made the most of these opportunities HAS BEEN GOOD FOR BARBADOS…. but it don’t make them LORD and GOD…. and even he got criticized and crucified too….

    Bizzy should use his writing skills to explain his role in the ABC flyover scam…. I am also interested in how much money they contribute to the two political parties to ensure that their domineering business positions are maintained , no matter who is elected…

    …Do they expect to ‘juck out we eye’ and ALSO be beyond criticism or even ministerial advice???

    What Bizzy what?!?


  22. […] is also good to see that Barbados has Minister Haynesly Benn who is concerned about feeding people. As a person who has raised a few Black-Belly Sheep, I […]


  23. Barbadians in their great numbers must once and for all stop being misled by DLP and BLP Governments. The DLP and BLP are two of the biggest obstacles to the country’s further and greater growth and development. It is they who have foolishly allowed those Williams brothers and a few rich and wealthy others in Barbados to acquire so much land and property at the distinct and overbearing disadvantage of the landless and propertyless in this country.

    However, we take strong exception to and therefore denounce in the strongest possible terms those two Williams fools for their unrational and calculated attack on Mr. Benn, a gentleman and a very long standing agriculturalist, and some one who seems to have the interest of agriculture and the country at heart. What Mr. Benn has been reported to be saying in the media is absolutely and categorically right (Daily Nation, Tuesday, April 22, 2008).

    For their attack on the goodly Mr Benn, the INTELLECTUAL WRATH AND FURY of the people must be brought to bear on those Williams brothers and any others who suffer from some false and retarded belief that they ARE MORE SUPERIOR than we – the masses and middle classes in this country – many, many of whom have laboured so hard over the years to make this country what it is today, and whom must NOT be stopped now or at any time in the future from getting our fullest and richest rewards, and whom, too – to supplement the aforegoing – have long had the national interests at heart and not the interests of a few rich and wealthy in this country. Make NO mistake about!!

    PDC


  24. Those who are defending Sir Charles over Kendal should remember that, less than 5 years ago, Apes Hill and Waterhall were also under livestock and feedstock, similarly, Canefield. What are they now? Polo estates and golf course, with Canefield used for a reservoir which will deprive the aquifer of water downstream. I’m sorry, but I’ve seen it all before, the righteous indignation when they are criticized. Let’s just wait and see what happens down the road at Kendal before we jump too quickly to their defence.


  25. Philip Slater| BIO | I’M A FAN OF THIS BLOGGER
    Getting a Life
    Posted November 28, 2007 | 01:34 PM (EST)

    ——————————————————————————–

    Read More: American Consumerism, American Values, Consumerism, Life, Men, Money, Women, Breaking Business News

    We humans are always trying to reduce our vulnerability to fate. With dances we try to control the weather. With magic amulets and superstitious rituals we try to ward off accidents and influence the outcome of contests and games. Today the most common way we try to control fate is with money.

    But it often seems as if we’re still awaiting delivery on the control that money was supposed to bring. We live so much of our lives in man-made, technological environments that we’ve come to expect such control. We move switches and lights come on or the room gets warm, which leads us to expect a similar control over things like love, pleasure, success. “Why isn’t my life working when I’m doing all the right things?” we say, as if the universe were a cruel parent, maliciously withholding approval. And the more money we have the more we put ourselves in the grip of this expectation, and thus become more vulnerable to disappointment and discontent. The wealthiest among us certainly seem to complain much more than the poor — forever griping about service, quality, or delays. Money was supposed to make everything smooth — the way it does in movies — and it so often fails to live up to its promise.

    Email
    Print
    Buzz up!on Yahoo!Nor can it. For as we get more money we find we spend more time managing it, and managing the things it buys. Our lives become more complicated, and while the stress of not having enough money is eased, a new stress is added–the stress of not having enough time. We find we’re spending our lives waiting on our possessions–cleaning them, repairing them, moving them about, getting rid of them. One of the problems with material things is that each purchase requires others. You buy a widget. Then you buy accessories for your widget. Then you buy a container for your widget, and a carrier for transporting it. Then you buy some spray for cleaning your widget, and a kit for repairing it, and an attachment for it, and so on. And by the time you do all that your widget is obsolete and looks tacky next to somebody’s brand new widget, and when you buy that one you find that none of the other stuff works with it and you have to start all over again. Ivan Illich calculated that if you added up the time Americans spent driving their cars, taking care of their cars, and earning the money necessary to purchase and maintain their cars, they were getting about five miles to the hour–barely better than they would walking. And if you add the time and money people spend at the gym working out, to compensate for the fact that they don’t walk (even to the gym, usually), it’s pretty much a wash. We’re working harder than ever, and have less time than ever, earning the money to pay for all our time-saving and labor-saving equipment.

    One reason our assets so often fail to keep pace with our wants is the high price we pay for social status. Ken Murray once described Hollywood’s famous this way: “they spend more than they make, on things they don’t need, to impress people they don’t like.” They try to convince themselves their lives are worthwhile by staring fixedly into the cold mirror of other people’s envy.

    Men who feel themselves unattractive to women, for example, often try to compensate by buying expensive sports cars–an approach strongly approved by advertisers. But as a young woman friend once commented, “A dweeb with a Porsche is still a dweeb.” If a car, or a dress, or a house, “says who you are”, as ads so often claim, you’re merely a manikin.

    To be a billionaire is considered by many to be the pinnacle of success in America. Reasonably invested it will produce an income of a hundred million a year. Money will pour into your pockets no matter how extravagant you are. You can travel anywhere, in any way you want; eat, drink, or wear anything you want; live anywhere you want, and not put a dent in your income. You can, of course, build mansions you never spend any time in, buy yachts that never weigh anchor, and so on. You can buy fame, you can buy power, and you can buy the means of acquiring more money. What you can’t buy is the ability to enjoy what you have. Many who possess gorgeous views never look out the window.

    During the dotcom bubble of the late 1990s so many people became disillusioned about money it acquired a clinical moniker–“sudden wealth syndrome”–denoting the depression that comes to people who discover that wealth hasn’t enriched their lives. We heard a lot about men and women giving up high-paying jobs to spend more time enjoying loved ones, or to pursue careers that paid less but were more fulfilling. Yet most Americans are still trying to “get ahead” of some imagined opponent–eager to trade the rich feast of joy for the thin gruel of triumph.

    Recent psychological research on happiness has shown that thi8ngs like money, beauty, and social prominence don’t seem to make life any better. People who are unhappy without money will be unhappy with it. Ambition and contentment are opposites, after all.

    Yet it’s hard to keep our balance with all the voices shouting at us to buy, gorge, and compete–hard to focus on what we want out of life. Technology, for example, is always about what we will be able to do, rather than on what we might want to do. The implication is that you ought to want to do what you can do. You ought to want to go from zero to 60 mph in six seconds, you ought to want to replace your rake with a noisy, dusty machine, you ought to want to have 500 TV channels. The price gap between needs and wants is substantial, but the price gap between wants and oughts is gigantic.

    If the American consumer did a cost-benefit analysis on every purchase before it was made, 90% of it would stay in the store. Politicians and economists shudder at this prospect. It would be an economic catastrophe, they say. Our economy depends on people buying things they don’t need and will throw away in a few years. This is why Christmas is so important to our economy. As easy as it is to buy ourselves things we don’t need, it’s far easier to buy them for someone else.

    We all want to enjoy ourselves, and–because we’re a social species–to feel useful, to contribute. We want to love and feel loved. We want to understand the world around us and learn new skills. We want to have interesting and challenging experiences. But money and possessions aren’t necessary to achieve any of these goals, a reality hard to remember amid the deafening assault of media hype and technological possibilities. We so often feel out of control in our man-made world, and in the midst of our confusion we cling to the idea that more money will give us more control. But the quest for more money is what creates the chaos in the first place.

    Comments for this post are now closed

  26. Dr. Justin Robinson Avatar
    Dr. Justin Robinson

    It probably provides little comfort, but Barbados is not alone in its current concerns about food. The head of the UN World Food Programme (WFP) summed up the global food shortages as a “A silent tsunami which knows no borders sweeping the world”. The Economist magazine used the theme as their cover for last week, “The Silent Tsunami: The Food Crisis and How To Solve It.” Joachim von Braun, the head of the International Food Policy Research Institute says that “World agriculture has entered a new, unsustainable and politically risky period.”

    The increases in the prices of major commodities in the food supply chain have been steep and sharp. The BBC reports that from March 2007 to March 2008, the price of wheat increased 130%, soya 87%, rice 74% and corn 31%. However, the rate of price increases has really taken off this year. For example, since January 2008 rice prices have increased 141%. So what is driving all this?

    The price increases are generally attributed to a lethal combination of high fuel costs, bad weather in key food producing countries, the increase in land allocated to bio-fuels, and a surge in demand – much of it from the rising middle classes of China and India. Ethanol production in the USA has increased from 12 billion litres in 2004 to 42 billion litres in 2007 and is forecasted to be around 50 billion litres in 2008, while meat consumption in China has moved from 20 KG per person in 1980 to 50KG per person in 2007.

    A major part of the problem is that once the price of rice or wheat has risen, other factors kick in which make things worse. There is panic and people start hoarding, speculators buy up supply, and food producing countries impose export controls to try and preserve food for their own people. This then means less is available to be exported to countries which rely on food imports. So, is the era of cheap food over, can the current problems be solved?

    In theory, the rapid increases in food prices should create incentives for increased food production, which should resolve the problem. WFP head Josette Sheeran says she is confident the world could produce the food it needed, it was just a question of riding this difficult period and getting enough resources to invest. She went on to argue that “soaring food prices should be a wake-up call for the world to make long term investment in the food supply chain.” Small farmers will be unable to deliver more food without that investment. Amy Barry from Oxfam argues that agriculture has been badly neglected. “Agriculture stopped being sexy, it was all about unglamorous logistics,” she said. “The focus was more on delivering health and education services. That has to change.”

    But it is not going to be a quick fix. Fuel prices are forecasted to remain high, demand from China and India is likely to continue growing and by its very nature, farming supply always responds with a lag. Many economists believe that government subsidies and price controls on food have slowed the adjustment process by shielding consumers from the food price increases.

    Agriculture clearly needs to needs to move up the policy agenda and aggressive efforts made to expand local and regional production. It may not lead to cheap food but at least it may avert food shortages.


  27. Those persons or companies holding large tracts of agricultural land that is idle, should be taxed on it to the extent that it would be cheaper to put it back into production. They should also be advised that, no matter how long they keep it in bush, it will never be approved for development. It really is time to stop pussy- footing around with these people.


  28. Thanks Dr. Robinson. Dennis Jones over at Living in Barbados (a very good blog to me) asked a few days ago why the economists in Barbados are so deafeningly silent.
    Seems everyone is asking the same thing.
    I understand what is happening in the world it is just that sometimes the jargon escapes me.

  29. Dr. Justin Robinson Avatar
    Dr. Justin Robinson

    The latest data is showing that corn prices have risen 70% for the year to date.

    There is a projected decline in the price of wheat as output expands. However, analysts suggest that the expanded wheat output is at the expense of rice output.

    Agriculture must now become sexy again and rise to the top of the policy agenda along with alternative energy and energy efficiency.


  30. One of the fundamental reasons why so many so-called economists in Barbados – many too from UWI, Cave Hill – do NOT participate in public discussion on fundamental social problems and issues affecting the country, or sectors of it, is that they DO NOT have any POSSIBLE/ANSWERS to many of these social problems and issues. Many of these so-called economists have long been impressing the public with the idea that to provide POSSIBLE/ANSWERS is key to proving academic brilliance and scholarship, on their part. But surely they have fallen on their own swords, so to speak, because they do NOT have any POSSIBLE/ANSWERS to even many of the so-called economic problems and issues we the masses and middle classes of people of Barbados, and the country as well, face on a daily basis in this country. Hence, their non-participation or silence!! Mr. Owen Arthur and Clyde Mascoll are so-called economists, yet in their respective roles over the last 15 years or so (just to this extent though) of public service, they have starkly failed the masses and middle classes of people of Barbados, by NOT providing any POSSIBLE/ANSWERS to many of these fundamental social economic problems and issues, and many of which have long been caused by Western Economic thinking. Furthermore, they – Messrs. Arthur and Mr. Mascoll have been contributing to the greater misery, disaster, and despair of the said masses and middle classes of people.

    Now that we have Dr. Justin Robinson, so-called financial economist, making more contributions to this blog, is there an iota of evidence that he is providing any POSSIBLE/ANSWERS – in his contributions – to the fundamental problems and issues we are right now facing in Barbados with regard to the glaring lack of development of so-called economic and financial solutions that themselves should ultimately greatly be assisting in the bringing about of viable, workable, alternative sources of energy for Barbados? How about the so-called economic and financial solutions needed from him concerning how Barbados should properly cushion the worst effects on it of the worsening international economic and financial situation? So much for the narrative and regurgition from many of students at UWI, Cave Hill, to many of the Senior Lecturers at UWI, Cave Hill. Truly, many of them both have long been squandering many of the educational opportunities they have been presented with by the country, and that the late and Right Excellent Errol Barrrow and others did lay the foundation for many years ago!!

    PDC


  31. […] look down their noses at the farming community to spout hot air. We encourage Barbadians to try to focus dispassionately on the solutions which are required by the agricultural sector for sometime now. The […]

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading