Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The Constitutional Review Commission (CRC) has submitted a final report, all 360 pages. With the assistance AI here is a summary.

 Preamble  

Replace the current preamble to better reflect Barbados’ history and modern values, including:
    •    Recognition of the supremacy of God, human dignity, and the role of the family.
    •    Acknowledgment of historical injustices such as slavery.
    •    National commitments to social welfare, environmental conservation, and regional integration.
    •    A celebration of the transition to a republic and the diverse origins of Barbadians.

Citizenship

    1.    Gender Equality:
    •    Remove all remaining gender discrimination in citizenship provisions.
    •    Replace references to “father” or “mother” with “parent” to ensure neutrality.
    2.    Expansion of Citizenship by Descent:
    •    Extend citizenship to individuals with Barbadian grandparents (not just parents).
    •    Consider special pathways for diaspora members to acquire citizenship by registration.
    3.    Retention of Citizenship by Birth:
    •    Maintain unconditional birthright citizenship, with two exceptions:
    •    Children born to diplomats accredited to Barbados.
    •    Children born to “enemy aliens” in occupied territories.
    •    Update references to ensure gender neutrality in these exceptions.
    4.    Dual and Multiple Citizenship:
    •    Explicitly allow Barbadians to hold dual or multiple nationalities.
    5.    Citizenship by Registration:
    •    Retain pathways through residence or marriage but delegate specific criteria (e.g., residency periods) to legislation.
    •    Elevate provisions for adopted children to constitutional status, allowing them citizenship upon adoption.
    6.    Loss of Citizenship:
    •    Retain provisions allowing for renunciation or deprivation of citizenship, ensuring adherence to due process principles.

Fundamental Rights and Freedoms

    1.    Broader and Positive Framing:
    •    Guarantee rights positively in a single, expansive clause rather than through negative, exceptions-focused provisions.
    •    Include a general limitation clause that ensures restrictions are justifiable in a free and democratic society.
    2.    Expanded Anti-Discrimination Protections:
    •    Protect against discrimination on additional grounds, such as:
    •    Sexual orientation, disability, pregnancy, gender, class, marital status, and health status.
    3.    Inclusion of Social and Economic Rights:
    •    Add obligations for the State to progressively ensure:
    •    Access to education, healthcare, adequate housing, food, and water.
    •    A safe and healthy environment, especially in light of climate change.
    4.    Horizontal Application of Rights:
    •    Extend fundamental rights to bind private actors, ensuring that protections apply universally across society.
    5.    Specific Rights Enhancements:
    •    Incorporate additional rights such as:
    •    The right to work.
    •    The right to fair administrative action.
    •    The right to access information held by the State.
    •    Rights for persons with disabilities.
    6.    Creation of a Human Rights Commission:
    •    Establish an independent body to monitor and promote the enforcement of human rights.

Governance and Institutions

    1.    President’s Role:
    •    Retain the President as a non-executive, unifying figure.
    •    Extend the term of office to seven years, separate from parliamentary terms.
    •    Remove the requirement for presidential assent to legislation.
    2.    Parliamentary Reforms:
    •    Maintain the constituency-based election system for the House of Assembly.
    •    Mandate gender parity in the Senate.
    •    Reduce the qualifying age for parliamentary membership to 18 years.
    •    Increase opposition representation in the Senate to ensure robust debate.
    3.    Opposition Leadership:
    •    Address situations where no formal Leader of the Opposition exists by designating the opposition party with the highest votes to fulfill constitutional roles.
    4.    Ministerial Accountability:
    •    Introduce a mandatory Code of Conduct for ministers and parliamentary secretaries, with oversight by the Integrity Commission.
    5.    Appointments to Key Offices:
    •    Create a Constitutional Offices Commission to ensure shared decision-making in appointments (e.g., judges, service commission members).
    •    Reduce the Prime Minister’s unilateral influence on appointments.

Judiciary

    1.    Improving Judicial Administration:
    •    Create the position of President of the High Court to oversee its administration, leaving the Chief Justice to focus on the Court of Appeal.
    2.    Strengthening Independence:
    •    Empower a revamped Judicial and Legal Service Commission to oversee judicial appointments and discipline.
    •    Remove the Prime Minister’s power to extend judicial tenure beyond the retirement age.
    3.    Establishing Accountability:
    •    Introduce progressive disciplinary measures (e.g., reprimands, suspensions) for judges instead of limiting sanctions to removal.
    •    Standardize retirement age for judges at 72.
    4.    Autonomy in Court Operations:
    •    Establish a Court Services Department under judicial control to manage resources and reduce reliance on the Executive.

Public Service and Oversight Institutions

    1.    Service Commissions:
    •    Operationalize the Teaching Service Commission.
    •    Provide each service commission with its own secretariat for greater efficiency.
    •    Make these commissions independent of ministerial control.
    2.    Regulatory and Oversight Bodies:
    •    Strengthen the independence of institutions like the Human Rights Commission, Electoral and Boundaries Commission, Auditor General, Ombudsman, and Integrity Commission.
    •    Guarantee adequate funding and staffing.
    •    Require annual reports to Parliament on their operations.
    3.    Public Service Values:
    •    Embed principles of professionalism, transparency, meritocracy, and impartiality into the constitution to guide the public service.

Miscellaneous

    1.    Access to Constitutional Justice:
    •    Allow individuals, groups, and associations to seek redress for constitutional breaches on their behalf or on behalf of others.
    2.    Population Challenges:
    •    Address declining population trends by:
    •    Encouraging diaspora participation.
    •    Expanding pathways to citizenship.

These detailed recommendations reflect a comprehensive approach to building a modern, inclusive, and accountable constitutional framework for Barbados. Let me know if you need clarification on any specific section!

See full report


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

26 responses to “Report of the Constitutional Review Commission (CRC) completed”


  1. Just from this here ‘preamble’ we suggest that the authors could not have been exposed to the works of Gerald Horne, CLR James and Eric Williams, amongst others of course.

    Horne in particular argues that the origins of the proximate republic was not the province of a revolution but the exact opposite, a counter-revolution.

    More so, and Horne continues to contend, that that American republic was more a product of class collaborationism.

    At least from the preamble, we can see the influences of a more modern class collaboration as evidenced by a wokeist ideological framing.

    But that the proximate American Republican project is now clearly descending in an unmistakeable fascism should give pause to the elected dictatorship in Bridgetown about what republicanism means.

    Of course, the ever present spectre of Whiteness at the heart of what Barbados has been and continues to be is ever present, even if unmentioned and unmentionable.

    Such Whiteness, the original class collaboration political project within this proximate republican effort which in itself congealed Europeans who for thousand of years were warring against other Europeans, but who after 1492, found common cause or class collaboration within the then so-called New World to genocide the inhabitants of this Western Hemisphere and enslave Afrikans.

    This is what republicanism has been, still is, as it represents bourgeoise excuse for being even as the most grim outcome awaits.


  2. This Constitution is a Good Start for a New Start

    Stop the War On Woke
    aka enlightened liberated thinking..

    White Wars
    Psychological warfare focuses on the perceptions, thoughts, and feelings of human agents to affect the psychology of human actors. Cognitive warfare is a concept that has evolved a step beyond psychological warfare, focusing on the occupation of human cognition to ultimately impact human acts.

    Babylon released the chains but dem a used dem brain


  3. @Pachamama November 23, 2024 at 2:30 pm “…which in itself congealed Europeans who for thousand of years were warring against other Europeans, but who after 1492…”

    Not were warring.

    But

    Are warring.

    Europe has never congealed, still is not congealed. Hot war going on right now, and looking to get hotter, between European Russia and European Ukraine, and supported by other European and European descended nations, eg. the USA.


  4. Human Rights
    Human Wrongs
    Lessons to be Learned
    Cannot afford to get the rights wrong
    Correct the wrong and make the wrong right

    On 21 November 2024, Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court (‘Court’), in its composition for the Situation in the State of Palestine, unanimously issued two decisions rejecting challenges by the State of Israel (‘Israel’) brought under articles 18 and 19 of the Rome Statute (the ‘Statute’). It also issued warrants of arrest for Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu and Mr. Yoav Gallant.

    Netanyahu cried out that this decision is “Antisemitic”

    USA condones Israel’s bull crap and in the twisted world of Trump they will claim anti-racists calling out white people as racist “is racist to the racist white people”.

    In the Brave New World of Barbados, the PM has spoken out about boldly about Netanyahu’s war crimes in UN and slammed Netanyahu for handling of Gaza crisis.

    Up! Up! Up!


  5. This ‘commission’, so called, has not put a word in the wrong place as according to the scriptures of the demonic goddess Mia Amor Mottley.

    The epitome of an elected dictatorship is the ability to have such a ‘commission’, while pretending that the commissioners have voices of their own and coming from diverse backgrounds, deliver to Mottley not a single word objectionable.

    Mottley, as a lawyer, has done better than that famed Guyanese barrister, who had a prefect win ratio in murder cases given that the judges, the jury, the court, were all familial or factotums of his, Sir Lionel Luckoo, we seem to recall.

    Well done Mottley! This is a signal contribution towards the descent into fascism as in line with those in Western capitals so beloved by you.


  6. -Mia Mottley is a slave descendant just like the people of Barbados
    -and has the people’s interests at heart
    -She is no slave master

    O Lord Berta Berta O Lord gal oh-ah
    O Lord Berta Berta O Lord gal well

    Go ‘head marry don’t you wait on me oh-ah
    Go ‘head marry don’t you wait on me well now
    Might not want you when I go free oh-ah
    Might not want you when I go free well now

    O Lord Berta Berta O Lord gal oh-ah
    O Lord Berta Berta O Lord gal well now

    Raise them up higher, let them drop on down oh-ah
    Raise them up higher, let them drop on down well now
    Don’t know the difference when the sun go down oh-ah
    Don’t know the difference when the sun go down well now


  7. ON THE TABLE

    Gender parity, code of conduct for ministers in Constitutional Report

    Anew Constitution of Barbados should bring gender parity to the country, a stronger Opposition presence in the Senate and even a code of conduct for ministers of Government.

    Those are some of the recommendations proposed by the country’s Constitutional Reform Commission (CRC) in its report, a document of more than 360 pages, which has been presented to President, The Most Honourable Dame Sandra Mason.

    The commission was established to examine, consider and inquire into the Constitution of Barbados and all other related laws and matters with a view to the development and enactment of a new Constitution for Barbados.

    “A Human Rights Commission should be established for Barbados, and charged, among other things, with the responsibility to promote respect for human rights and develop a culture of human rights; monitor, investigate and report on the observance of human rights in all spheres of life; receive and investigate complaints of alleged human rights abuses and take steps to secure redress; and act as the principal organ of the State in ensuring compliance with obligations under treaties and conventions relating to human rights,” the CRC said.

    The commission also recommended that in a new Constitution, the chapter on citizenship should feature gender-neutral language, in particular the use of the term “parent”, rather than “father” or “mother” in recognition of the legal equality of both parents.

    Republic

    “Barbados should continue to be a parliamentary republic, with the effective management of the day-to-day affairs of the Government vested in the Cabinet. In addition, it recommended that the present system for the election of the president by Parliament should be retained,” the commission recommended.

    Additionally, the commission believes the term of office for the President shouldbe increased to seven years and the President should be able to seek re-election, a recommendation made in the Forde Constitutional Review of 1998.

    The commission is also recommending that the composition of the Senate be altered to increase the number of Opposition Senators.

    “The Senate should be comprised of 12 senators appointed on the advice of the Prime Minister, four senators appointed on the advice of the Leader of the Opposition (instead of two) and five senators appointed at the President’s own discretion,” it suggested.

    The commission also recommended that the Senate have a gender quota, inclusive of six Government senators of either sex, two Opposition senators of either sex and no less than two Independent Senators of either sex.

    Regarding eligibility to Parliament, the commission said the minimum qualifying age for election to the House of Assembly and appointment to the Senate, should be lowered to 18, down from 21 years old.

    In relation to how political parties operate in Barbados, the CRC recommended that the new Constitution require Parliament to enact laws to regulate the existence, operation and financing of political parties, as well as the financing and spending of candidates for election to the House of Assembly.

    Several recommendations were made in relation to Parliament and the behaviour of parliamentarians.

    The commission suggested that the office of Deputy Prime Minister should not be provided for in the Constitution but should continue to be at the discretion of the Prime Minister.

    “The Prime Minister should be required to prepare a Code of Conduct for ministers and parliamentary secretaries, which shall be binding on the Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries and the Code of Conduct should be laid before both Houses,” the report said.

    The commission recommended that the country’s Integrity Commission be empowered to investigate and report on alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct.

    Inherited power

    In terms of power of assent, the commission recommended that the inherited monarchical power of the Head of State to assent to or withhold assent from Bills passed by Parliament should be discontinued.

    “In order for a bill to become law as an Act of Parliament, once passed by both Houses of Parliament (or in certain cases, only the House of Assembly) in accordance with the Constitution and other law, a bill must be certified by the Speaker as having been validly passed and thereafter published in the Official Gazette,” said the commission.

    Regarding the judiciary, the commission recommended the age of retirement for Justices of Appeal and Judges of the High Court be standardised and set at 72 years old.

    It also recommended that the new Constitution make better provision for judicial discipline, in particular provision for disciplinary measures short of dismissal, such as the issuance of a formal warning or reprimand or a suspension.

    Now that the report has been completed, the next move will be a public meeting, expected to be hosted early in 2025 where the chairman, retired Justice Christopher Blackman, will present findings of the report. (BA)

    Source: Nation


  8. As for the constitution!!!!! Mia would like the age for when someone can become an MP to be lowered to 18. Seriously! There are young people passing through the education who are barely literate and fail to obtain qualifications. Those who are educated can’t find a job and end up migrating. With this in mind why is there a need to lower the age of an MP.

    This constitution is merely a construct of Mia’s inner thoughts. She will need to explain what authority gave her the right, to state that Barbados was going to become a republic.


  9. @ David,
    Where have my comments about adoption gone? Why has it not made the cut?


  10. @TLSN

    There is nothing in spam from you.


  11. @ David,

    Did you listen to Starcom Network news ?

    Barbados is number 4 in the Caribbean when it comes to rape.


  12. @Hants

    Heard about it as well as 4 out of 5 women experiencing domestic abuse.


  13. At some point there will be the recognition that power in the world has just this last week decisively and irrevocably shifted.

    We wonder where the kind who, following Western misguidances, now insist on following trite, will then hide their ugly faces, if we get past this historical moment.

    For last week the Russian Federation, in response to the deployment of strategic weapons by NATO, ATACMS and storm shadow missiles, on Russian territory, titularly from Ukrainian controlled lands, responded with a type of weapon, unknown to weapons experts in the West Ted Postol et al, which now has Western militaries in a quandary.

    It’s a weapon which has the destructive power of nuclear weapons but without the fallout, environmental affects, and the like.

    And as the whores within the media of the collective West are made to project the image that there is nothing here to see. Even as some here, like asses, continue to labour under quaint notions about predestination an historical moment beckons.

    What does this mean? Well the East now has the military means to avoid all out nuclear war while delivering total destruction. While the West, lagging behind by more than 10 years, technologically, must now face a reliance on nuclear weapons or surrender power to Eastern forces.

    And given that Russian has better than military alliances with China, Iran, and others, what ever the Russians have they too possess!


  14. Directed energy weapons!


  15. So…..what I commented a few weeks back regarding the dangers of casual misogyny and the dismissal of women as inferior thinkers, unworthy of being taken seriously in discussions even on BU, relegated to a category that includes children and………, the origin of disobedience in the world, deserving of punishment by the pangs of childbirth, emotional creatures to be excluded from power, this misguided literal interpretation of the Bible that condemns us to be ruled by our husbands, this is the consequence of such thinking.

    Rape and domestic abuse! Whoever would have “thunk” it?


  16. Barbados’ first (gay) women leader is casting in stone woman’s rights and equality and also an end to discrimination against homosexuals, which is a big blow to the patriarchy, bible bashers and the small minded old fashioned prejudiced people.

    It’s a standard script and quite predictable.


  17. I see a local paper has about four or more articles on gender violence. A few days ago, I commented that I could not believe the percentage quoted for gender violence in the Caribbean. I believe almost 2 out of 3 women were victims. Now I see that 3 of the top 10 spots for reported rape rates are held by the islanders.

    In addition, the home, which I believe would be one of the safest place for women, is one of the deadliest place for women on girls with 140 killed/day.
    ————————End here ————————


  18. I see that a comment I made here yesterday did not make it past the filters.

    Essentially, I stated that a redlined document which allowed us to see what changes were being considered would be helpful. To me, yes to me, it is quite possible that the first draft pf the new constitution mat be quite different from what we read in the commission’s report.

    Secondly, if it took so long to generate a report, then a working draft may be ‘years’ down the road. Do nothing today that can be done tomorrow.,

    Hoping this gets over the wall.


  19. @Pachamama November 25, 2024 at 3:02 pm “…delivering total destruction…”

    Is total destruction a good thing or a bad thing?


  20. And if things and people are totally destroyed do we have the capacity to make those things and people whole again?

    Or we int get there yet?

    And shouldn’t we have a fix before we do the destruction thingy?


  21. Violence against women in our societies has been swept under the carpet for decades. We recall a female radio show moderator, once implied it was a part of “ our culture”. Of course such bullshit is expected by those who don’t have the slightest idea of what “ we culture is.”
    Violence against our elderly, women and children , has been increasing throughout the region.


  22. Call to rein in SOEs

    BARBADOS’ PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (PFM) are “quite sophisticated” but there is room for improvement in Government’s fiscal affairs.

    This includes keeping a tighter lid on financial transfers to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), providing the Auditor General with additional staff and other resources, enhancing the monitoring of fiscal risks, including those linked to climate and other shocks, and improving the allocation of public maintenance funding.

    That is the assessment of Lesley Fisher, public financial management adviser at the Barbados-based Caribbean Regional Technical Assistance Centre, an arm of the International Monetary Fund.

    Addressing the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Barbados 31st Annual Conference at the Lloyd Erskine Sandiford Centre

    yesterday, Fisher also stressed the importance of Government’s cash management.

    “I have worked with the Government of Barbados . . . for the last five years, and having worked globally – in Asia Pacific, in African countries, [and] some European countries – I do think the PFM systems in Barbados are quite sophisticated,” she said while speaking on the topic Why Effective Public Financial Management Matters To Barbados’ Future.

    “There is leadership at the top, there is commitment to implement reforms and the strong ownership of the PFM reform agenda. But there is a lot more that still needs to be done.” On the issue of SOEs, Fisher said that “a lot of public investment is delivered by state-owned enterprises or SOEs, and while SOEs are really good vehicles to support Governments capacity gaps, they have to be managed efficiently”.

    “The SOEs need to be well managed and coordinated. . . we need to keep a closer eye on the transfers to SOE.”

    She also raised the issue of timely and quality auditing as required by the Public Finance Management Act.

    “We’ve met with the Auditor General several times, and like everybody else, [the office is] overstretched, understaffed, [and has] capacity constraints, but we need to normalise, kind of comply with the PFM Act.”

    Fisher advocated the use of fiscal risk management as part of Barbados’ preparedness for shocks, including the unexpected ones like the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “Even when you get a shock, even when there’s a crisis, we still have to be disciplined. We cannot spend limitlessly because there are consequences,” she stated.

    Fisher advised of the need for Barbados to have an adequate public maintenance budget, saying that “we found that Barbados’ maintenance budget is significantly underfunded and even where maintenance funding is provided, it is underspent”.

    “I think at the very least, we should spend what has been planned and I’m not sure why they’re not spending that . . .,” she said. ( SC)

    Source: Nation


  23. As a son of God, I don’t view politics as left vs right, socialism vs capitalism, etc,
    but as moral vs immoral, where all the fake religious sanctimonious cxnts are on the right / far right.

    “The unrestricted person, who has in hand what they will in all events, is free. But anyone who can be restricted, coerced, or pushed into something against what they will is a slave.” —EPICTETUS, DISCOURSES, 4.1.128b–129a”

  24. NorthernObserver Avatar

    Normal gobbledygook from bureaucratic entities.
    All long known issues.
    Nearly December 1, and no Annual Auditor General Report yet. Said office in understaffed, and intentionally so. Fewer employees= fewer reports = fewer questions for those in charge to answer for.


  25. Whenever I complimented my son he would say ‘”Don’t say but”

    Read Lesley Fisher’s statement and see how many ‘buts’ spoken and unspoken follows the word ‘sophisticated’

    What’s that warm thing running down your leg? Don’t believe them, it’s pee not rain.


  26. CRC report: Formalising symbolism

    While the CRC claimed to be “at all times keenly aware that its mandate concerned constitutional reform, rather than mere review or revision”, it appeared to have understood this only intellectually.

    FOLLOWING MY CURSORY PERUSAL of the report and recommendations of the Constitutional Reform Commission (CRC), my first and immediate reaction was that it was an exercise in the formalisation of symbolism.

    Reading through the recommendations, the areas of emphasis, and the justifications and rationalisations offered by the commissioners, there was an abiding sense in which they were studiously avoiding the fundamental options which would result in “reform” and placed deliberate emphasis on retaining the existing constitution, while tightening the “small parts” that appeared to be shaky.

    It felt like someone who took his car to a mechanic for a new engine, but instead the mechanic decided to oil, shine and tighten the existing parts, to remove the “bad sounds”, while leaving it structurally intact since he determined that “it was still a good engine”.

    While the CRC claimed to be “at all times keenly aware that its mandate concerned constitutional reform, rather than mere review or revision”, it appeared to have understood this only intellectually. Often, when confronted with a specific proposal for fundamental change, the Commission would reject the demand. When several of these instances are stacked up the report reads like an elaborate defence of the existing constitution.

    The CRC appeared to have had two main tasks.

    First, happy to be distracted by the symbolic as a substitute for the substantive, it aspired to formalise the symbolic aspects of the Constitution, like the Presidency and the Bill of Rights. Secondly, instead of proposing deep reforms, focused on strengthening features of the Constitution that have proven weak in practice. This was seen particularly in the recommendations around the need for Special Commissions to overcome present weaknesses associated with Prime Ministerial appointments and with recommendations for the judiciary. It was also seen in recommendations for allowing for opposition senators when one party won all the seats (already defacto practised).

    On most substantive issues, the CRC opted for the status quo: The Presidency – unchanged (except the right to ascent to bills removed); the first-past-the-post constituency-based election – kept; proposals for proportional representation in senatorial appointments – denied; the even number constituencies – kept; the right to recall parliamentarians – denied; the powers of the Prime Minister – unchanged, except for the greater role of the Commissions). Space denies further examples, but the point is made.

    It was never to be expected that a process of constitutional reform would completely overhaul the existing political order to make it unworkable or unstable. However, on the many key areas that affirm the undemocratic and the coloniallyinherited aspects of the Barbadian political system, it was expected that every opportunity for change would be grasped. Instead, the CRC erred on the side of timidity. Its proposals strengthen and justify the existing order, but it has not ushered in a new political system for Barbados.

    Tennyson Joseph is Associate Professor of Political Science at North Carolina Central University. Email tjoe2008@live.com

    Source: Nation

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading