Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

A reckoning for social justice is unfolding in Barbados. Unlike the USA earlier this year where it was prompted by police brutality and death, in Barbados the reckoning has been prompted by labour unrest.

Working Class Inclusion in the Social Partnership

In an address on World Day of Social Justice on February 20th 2020, the Minister of Labour Colin Jordan spoke on the topic “Closing the Inequalities Gap to Achieve Social Justice”. In that address he stated, “social justice connotes an environment where there is equity and fairness, no one is marginalized, exploited or discriminated against, there is no poverty, there are equal gender opportunities, and there is no infringement of human rights” and “social justice will be achieved through a variety of means including education, awareness-building and legislation.” Sad to say, the minimum wage was overlooked and not included. A few months later, in June 2020 the Minister brought legislation to discriminate against the already exploited working class of Barbados.

On December 14, 2020 after months of social unrest, the Minister stated that the Government will revisit the changes made to the Severance Pay Act which reduced the length of time persons can apply for severance and revisit employers’ refusal to pay severance. However, also at the heart of this serious matter is the fact that the government and a ‘social’ partnership made a bad decision against one class in society which could have plunged the island into its worst labour relations crisis since the 1930’s Riots. Until it is changed, the BEST Program is an epic failure which will affect the entire labour force not only Tourism workers. The idea that such a decision was accepted by government and the social partnership is a matter of grave concern. It is a clear indication that the social partnership is a limited interest group serving its own interest and that it has the propensity to make its self-interest government policy.

In order for there to be meaningful change in terms of labour legislation going forward, the social partnership must be a broad based interest group which includes representation from the working class. Co-operatives and NGO’s must also be represented.

Historical Origins of the Minimum Wage

To have any discussion on wages in Barbados, one must start with three things which are the distribution of land and capital and the labour force that supplies labour. All three have been determined historically during slavery when the white upper class owned the land and the capital and the black working class were the source of labour. The black working class went from no wages to extremely low wages as the planters had an abundance of labour to choose from. The disparities between the profits of the planter class and wages of the labourers came to a head in 1937 and riots erupted. A low wage of about 30 cents a day was being paid.

Today ownership of the means of production (land and capital) has basically remained unchanged in Barbados. Even with the advent of credit unions little has changed for the working class. Constrained by the lack of Capital and land, the working class has been unable to impact the wages that they earn even with the support of the labour unions.

The minimum wage is a wage at the subsistence level. At present, the minimum wage is $6.25 per hour in Barbados. It is the demarcation of poverty line when compared to the high cost of living. In essence, the minimum wage has kept the working class in poverty.

The Living Wage

A living wage is a wage that is high enough to maintain a normal standard of living. It takes into consideration the cost of food, transportation, rents, mortgages, utilities, clothing, self- maintenance, healthcare, education and the payment of taxes.

According to Oxfam the introduction of living wage is beneficial to a society when:

1. Increases in wages are long overdue.

2. It is used to address long standing issues in class/race inequalities.

3. It is used to reduce poverty.

4. It is used to fuel economic growth.

Government maintains a basket of goods that are under price controls. For decades that basket has remained unchanged even though taste has changed in the population due to a large consumption of imported goods. Control of what the working class eats has shifted from the planters to government if it determines what your wages can buy.

Government New Minimum Wage by Sector

Government has stated that it will introduce a new minimum wage structure by sector as opposed to an across the board minimum wage. For this to make an impact on the livelihoods of the working class, the following must occur:

1. There must be a best practice used to determine the valuable of types of labour. This may also negatively impact labour relations.

2. Government must invest in agriculture to increase locally grown crops to substitute for imports.

3. Government must provide subsidies to agriculture.

4. There must be an across the board price freeze to combat inflation.

5. Rents for the working class must be fixed or subsidized.

6. Food for the working class must be subsidized i.e. there must be 2 different price structures in the supermarket, one for the working class and another for everyone else.

7. There is a special interest rate for the working class.

8. Access to capital for the working class.

9. Subsidized transportation for the working class.

10. Land purchase and building materials are subsidized for the working class.

Conclusion

Getting back to the Minister’s address on February 20th, 2020, he failed to include the minimum wage of $6.25 an hour as part of the social justice environment that he described. Perhaps it was an oversight on the Minister’s part but that minimum wage has been responsible for the exploitation and discrimination of the working class of Barbados.

The government of Barbados has a choice, either subsidize the working class or provide a living wage. The question that government needs to determine is if it really wants to positively impact the lives of the working class in Barbados by taking the measures outlined above when it introduces the new minimum rate structure or if it will not be easier to provide the working class with a living wage which reduces government’s effort and cost. The new minimum rates structures on their own will not work unless they equate to a living wage.

Going forward it is hoped that the government comes to terms with the fact that representation from the working class is included in the social partnership and that there is acknowledgement that a minimum wage has failed largest class of the population and that a living wage must be legislated as it is in the best interest of all Barbadians.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

180 responses to “Another Heather Cole Column – Social Justice for the Working Class”


  1. @ William

    The problem is far worse than a few foreigners occupying government land. We have people living overseas who have their land occupied, and even more, the BWA running water to these illegally occupied premises. Go over to the Belle.
    We also have staff in the land tax department changing the names on records for friends and contacts. Al long as we have a perverse law that allows squatters to claim land after uninterrupted occupancy for ten years or more you will get this nonsense.
    I know of one squatter who every time the owner returned from New York he would take up a cutlass and pretend to be mad. He knew he only had to do it for two weeks every year.
    Our criminal and civil justice systems are not fit for purpose. If you call out police they say it is a civil matter, and if you try to take them to court the dishonest lawyers want to fleece you and the case takes years to come to court.


  2. That is why I tsll the Bajan to go and take over drax hall plantation

    The government/s cannot discriminate
    The man in England don’t live in Barbados and rich enuff to stay in a upscale hotel if he visit .
    He don’t need no plantation


  3. At last! Hal, Donna and Artaxerxes have found a topic where they have a mutual understanding as opposed to the foolishness of discussing
    who is married to whom. As if that is a subject that undermines Barbados sovereignty.

    The act of squatting should be made an illegal act if it is carried out by “aliens”; however, it should be used as a political weapon by impoverished Black Bajans. The return of the Drax family is an indicator that we have refused to learn from our past. Many of us would like to see a redistribution of land and would actively encourage the government to break the stranglehold of large scale Barbadian landowners irrespective of their colour.

    Another topic that we need to discuss was raised by the socially conscious Mariposa: emigration. She was referencing an article in today’s Advocate.

    https://www.barbadosadvocate.com/columns/guys-view-population-control-or-expansion

    I recognise the dangers of squatting. It is perceived as a problem of the impoverished class. More insidious than squatting is the slow creep of Citizenship by Investment. Our region is undergoing a change in our demographics – and I’m not singularly referencing race – which we seem to be oblivious to.

    Throughout our Caribbean region, her African population is considered surplus to requirement. Wake up people!

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/oliverwilliams1/2020/09/06/why-rich-americans-are-fleeing-to-the-caribbean-this-winter/?sh=137a0132561b

    https://iafrica.com/investing-in-paradise-holiday-homes-with-added-second-passport-benefits-for-south-africans/


  4. History would record this govt for its many first
    First in setting many precedents which would eventually bite the tax payers in the arse for years tp come
    Govt solutions to hard issues have been those quick to give away the treasury hand over fist at taxpayers expense
    This one is just another ongoing vehicle laced in political promises
    Yeah lol barbados still punching above its weigh


  5. @TLSN

    As you know, when Greece, Spain, Portugal and Chile had dictators, tourists still flocked to those countries. During the Arab Spring, tourists from Europe were still going to Egypt and North Africa. Chile under Pinochet gave us the new global state pension model.
    The point is that the tourists could not care the slightest about the standard of living of the locals as long as they enjoy themselves.
    However, our politicians are obsessed with foreign earnings and could not care the least if they sold out their people or not as long as the tourists come.
    Our politicians could not care what ordinary people think about any demographic changes that their ill-thought out policies encourage.
    But they should remember that there is not a single country in the world where the various ethnicities and religious live together in total harmony.
    Whether we like it or not, the only saving grace for ordinary traditional Barbadians is reaching a settlement with white Barbadians. Anything else is a step to being wiped out.
    The onus is not just on black Barbadians, white Bajans must also make a step forward. If they believe that they will survive a take-over by the New Barbadians, they are living in cloud cuckoo land.


  6. @ Hal
    I have decided to let some people bray. As you know, almost all the crisis we now face were predicted ,in some cases , forty or more years ago. You have already warned them about how easy it is for a wealthy ethnic group to settle and in a number of decades supplant ,the local population.
    I don’t understand how any sane person can look at almost sixty years of independence and bluntly refuse to admit, that we consciously decided to ignore relatively basic issues , in order to get so-called developed nation status. And then we have the globalists, in one breath they berate the economic structure of the global economy and then opine that we can go no further unless, we accept the same global construct they glowingly ridicule.
    After a while the effort to understand them becomes useless. And then you have the hallelujah choristers, who want to convince people that have been in the struggle for donkey years , that they are either ignorant or don’t understand basic concepts such as gradualism.
    Let them bray, I say.
    The real struggle continues.


  7. @ William

    I am sure you like me read what the various people say and build up a mental picture of them, even those who use a number of pseudonyms.
    As I have said on numerous occasions, even to ask a question is interpreted as a statement. It is the cognitive damage of learning by rote.
    Then there are the pass/aggressive interventionists, who slip in with anodyne statements, which are meant to carry a sting in the tail.
    It is a poor substitute for a proper debate because once they have made a statement, and it is challenged, all they can do is repeat the statement, then drift off in to personal abuse. There is no critical reasoning.
    Or, if one challenges the government and tries to critique its policies, then the apologists come out of the wood work like predators.
    I used to think they oft en fabricated things, I am now coming round to the belief that they just cannot comprehend basic statements and how to differentiate between those and questions.
    But the struggle goes on.


  8. @ Mr. Skinner

    Won’t it be much better if you focused on the substantive topic, rather than join other individuals in using every blog as an opportunity to constantly bash and make snide remarks about other contributors? If it isn’t some nonsense about people using one, two or twenty-two pseudonyms, it’s about the content of their comments, or they’re silly, animals, wild beast, or, some idiotic pseudo psychiatrist ‘diagnosing’ them, just by reading their contributions.

    This daily ‘you versus them’ campaign has become sickening and boring.

    When they respond to you accordingly, the real issues being discussed are often lost during the ensuing ‘tit for tats,’ which only serves to degrade the forum. As a result, BU has become a ‘hostile environment.’

    People are entitled to form their own opinions and whether you agree with them or not, you could either respect their opinions and move on, or, scroll pass their contributions.


  9. What does changing the name on a land tax bill, as alleged by the expert accomplish? What problems are created by providing water to “illegally occupied premises”? Who owns the land should not be the concern of the BWA.


  10. @ Artax
    “People are entitled to form their own opinions and whether you agree with them or not, you could either respect their opinions and move on, or, scroll pass their contributions”.(Quote)
    “it’s about the content of their comments, or they’re silly, animals, wild beast, or, some idiotic pseudo psychiatrist ‘diagnosing’ them, just by reading their contributions.”(quote)
    “This daily ‘you versus them’ campaign has become sickening and boring” (Quote).

    Kindly forward to the blog any instance in which I have ever referred to people in such derogatory terms: “they’re silly, animals, wild beast, or, some idiotic pseudo psychiatrist ‘diagnosing’ them,” Where have I participated in any daily “you versus them” actrivity that is becoming “sick and boring” Please forward such evidence to the blog.
    In my last submission I just told @Hal , that I have decided to just let people “b.ray”. I don’t understand how that can be offensive. In this current thread I had al ready pointed out to @ David , how I felt about the current housing/ squatter situation. I don’t think that you should have attributed some of what you have quoted to me.
    You stated just two or so weeks ago , after we had a very long discussion, that it was always a pleasure to engage me. The feeling is mutual. Respectfully, I think you are way off on this submission.
    All I request is that you bring some proof to back up what you have written or at the very least refrain from attributing words and or actions to me that I did not write or participate.
    However, in all sincerity , I certainly would not allow this post , to change my view that your contributions are always of a very high standard. I hope you continue the good work.
    The real struggle continues.


  11. “Not too long ago, depending on which party was in power( it happened under both in equal measure), the Minister or his or her point person, would call a party supporter, who perhaps, did not even have an application at National Housing , and tell them come and get the keys.”

    So question, you are not sure if they were on the list or not; but painting them as undeserving? Secondly, are you saying that these party supporters were “perhaps” not on the list and neither poor nor in need of government housing but took a unit? And if you are correct, how rampant are these instances? Wunna love to simplify tings eh and the argument is always about BDLP because government subsidised housing is a stroll in the park. Jesus take de wheel.


  12. Artax,

    Every damn day and when you respond they behave as though you started it. Only they can say what they like. Snide remark dropping all the time about butterflies etc.

    Just because you believe that our problems are not peculiar to Barbados and should be seen from that perspective, this is what you get.

    A trio with this air of superiority as though they alone know what is what.

    Steupse!

    TLSN,

    On the contrary, if you check you will find that I usually make fun of the occasions when I agree with Hal Austin’s main point. It is not such a rare occasion. However, mention of his wife is extremely rare, especially in my case.

    But he is famous for dropping nasty remarks. I will answer when I see fit.


  13. @ Enough
    Here is my very short post on the issue.
    @ David
    Sixty years of BLPDLP housing policy coming full circle. Seems a whole lot of people were asleep for decades. Now they wake up.
    Better late than never.
    Not too long ago, depending on which party was in power( it happened under both in equal measure), the Minister or his or her point person, would call a party supporter, who perhaps, did not even have an application at National Housing , and tell them “ come and get the keys”.
    Can’t plan okra and reap corn.
    The nonsense continues.
    Alllowed poor people to squat , turned a blind eye toward it, in order to get votes.
    Once more poor people used and abused and here comes the crocodile tears………
    Here is your question:
    “So question, you are not sure if they were on the list or not; but painting them as undeserving? Secondly, are you saying that these party supporters were “perhaps” not on the list and neither poor nor in need of government housing but took a unit? And if you are correct, how rampant are these instances? Wunna love to simplify tings eh and the argument is always about BDLP because government subsidised housing is a stroll in the park……….
    Now where id I write anything about “poor” ‘undeserving ” “neither poor nor in need”.
    These instances were and remain common.
    I hope this helps.


  14. @Artax, @Donna

    ‘Every damn day and when you respond they behave as though you started it. Only they can say what they like. Snide remark dropping all the time about butterflies etc”
    “Chasing butterflies” is far from a snide remark. Quite the opposite, it is used to express a belief /a dream that will tend to escape us and remain just out of reach. I did not invent the phrase, but heard it years ago when a very progressive radical used it in a lecture. He meant that if we continue to believe, that those who have power will just give it, up to satisfy the needs of the powerless, we will just be chasing butterflies. Since I am the one who usually uses it on BU, I thought I would explain why I use it. it is not a personal reference , just my way of responding when I surmise that we are actually of the belief that real power will be given. Real power is taken. I hope this clears up my use of the term.
    Peace


  15. “Slowed poor people to squat , turned a blind eye toward it, in order to get votes.”

    Does this not suggest that those party supporters who “perhaps” were not on the list were not poor or the undeserving poor? By the way, a month or so ago, a person I know who is on the list and not affiliated to any party got a call.


  16. WS

    Why are you pretending you don’t know what letting someone “bray” means?

    Cackle refers to a hen
    Braying refers to a donkey or more likely an ass

    You are not ignorant to the term it is used here on BU a plenty .


  17. @ John2
    No pretending here.
    I dont know why or how others use it. What I do know is that from high school, in a heated argument, one of us would say let him bray. I am quite aware of the sounds made by some animals. So, I just used the term, I am going to let them to bray. I don’t find it offensive at all. Braying is also thought to be a loud noise. He ‘roared like a lion-does that mean you are calling him a lion ? She clawed her way through the cave-are you calling her a cat ? so suddenly now saying let somebody bray means you are calling them a donkey or ass – gimme me a break. Another thing, for all the years on BU, I can’t remeber the word bray being popular but I know that others delight in calling people JA and RH. Guess you are more comforatble with those. Gimme a break.
    Thanks.


  18. @ Enuff
    You have me baffled. If you’re reading “Slowed”. I said that was a typo and I meant “Allowed”. Seriously,I honestly can’t follow what you are saying. I know of similar cases. It’s all corruption. That’s my point. You note the backlash from the squatters. We encourage that type of behaviour because it’s politically convenient. All we are doing is reaping what we sowed. That’s my point. Ask the Auditor General about these things. Over thirty years and some departments still not in compliance.
    Drip….drip……drip…….
    There’s a hole in the bucket. Fix it
    Peace


  19. Random thoughts
    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. The friend of my enemy is my enemy.

    I remember once making a next name to attack on a blogger. I cannot remember why. I have regrets.

    Sometimes, I thought of unmasking, is but I fear my writing style would link the real and pseudo me. And of course we have a few who run your phrases through analyzers 98% Theo.

    Just a gazer..friend of all and ally of none


  20. Soon, we will not have a auditor to ask. Problems solved.


  21. WS

    Roar like a lion – is powerful

    Bray like a donkey?????

    Which one would you like someone to say about you?

    Don’t tell me you know the meaning about “butterflies” and ignorant about braying

    As for JA / RH.
    I comfortable with anything. I hear cussing plenty everyday and will dish some if I have the feeling to – including braying

    No need to hide it and pretend.
    This is not church and the kids nowadays ain’t stupid and curse just as bad as adults when they are in their own company


  22. @ Mr. Skinner

    Yes, Mr. Skinner, it’s always a pleasure to engage you and I’ve learnt ‘a lot’ from your contributions over the years. But, if something occurred that bothers me, I believe I should, with all due respect, draw it to your attention.

    Perhaps it’s the way I ‘constructed’ my sentences. I specifically wrote, “RATHER THAN JOIN other individuals……….” It was not my intention to suggest YOU “referred to people in derogatory terms,” but to suggest you shouldn’t JOIN others and ‘go down that line.’

    RE: “…..or, some idiotic pseudo psychiatrist ‘diagnosing’ them, just by reading their contributions,” is self explanatory and NOT a reference to you.
    A few months ago, I read several contributions in response to your comments, in which I realised it was becoming a common practice for the author to continually ‘diagnosed’ other contributors. They’re either bullies, passive-aggressive, learnt by rote, savages, wild beasts, buffoons, and I could go on and on.
    Unfortunately, however, I’ve never read at anytime where you expressed disapproval of that behaviour. You would either ignore or find some excuse to defend it.

    RE: “Where have I participated in any daily “you versus them” activity that is becoming “sick and boring.” Please forward such evidence to the blog.”

    I did not use the word “you” to address YOU, Mr. Skinner, directly. It was used to refer to any person in general. However, I’ll give you two examples:

    [1]: YOU, the GROUP that post contributors under your real names versus THEM that use pseudonyms.

    In your December 19, 2020 7:30 AM contribution, you seemed to be implying that, because “The majority of contributions to BU are under pseudonyms,” David BU has essentially “planted hysteria and has been reaping hysteria.”
    And, in your December 19, 2020 9:56 AM contribution you “figured that BU, would benefit and become more recognized,” if people post using their real names.

    Supposed someone posted contributions under the name ‘Sonia Grant.’ How would you know if that’s the contributor’s ‘real name,’ or if they are actually a female? What methods are you going to use to determine if the person is actually Sonia Grant? Would you Google the name or contact all the Sonia Grants in Barbados to find out which one contributes to BU?

    What are the FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCES between BU bloggers William Skinner and ‘Tron’ both saying Barbados is 166 square miles or 2 x 4 = 8? Does Tron’s comments LACK CREDIBILITY because he used a pseudonym?

    “Who I am is irrelevant to the blog … take my ideas and comments for what they are. Those who confirm their identity should be held to same standard: we care less about your antecedents and want to focus on your current and consequent ideas posted.” [de pedantic Dribbler December 19, 2020 9:33 AM]

    “So, how exactly does an alias user offends blog sensibilities that a flaming throwing NAMED blogger doesn’t?” [de pedantic Dribbler December 19, 2020 9:33 AM]

    [2]: YOU, the GROUP that is always saying you’ve been in the struggle for years versus THEM you accuse of trying to “convince people that have been in the struggle for donkey years.”

    RE: “In my last submission I just told @Hal, that I have decided to just let people “bray.” I don’t understand how that can be offensive.”

    I did not ‘say’ your use of the word ‘bray’ was offensive.


  23. @ Mr. Skinner

    I should’ve given three (3) examples, so, I’ll add one more.

    [3]: YOU the ‘overseas Bajans’ versus THEM the ‘stay at home Bajans.’


  24. I see the feel sorry for me woman and the block limer are both 🏃 running their derriere.

    @ WS and @ HAL continue being who you are.


  25. @ Artax
    Thanks for the clarification.
    “In your December 19, 2020 7:30 AM contribution, you seemed to be implying that, because “The majority of contributions to BU are under pseudonyms,” David BU has essentially “planted hysteria and has been reaping hysteria.”
    And, in your December 19, 2020 9:56 AM contribution you “figured that BU, would benefit and become more recognized,” if people post using their real names.”
    You are centered where the majority on the blog tend to be. I should not be held responsible for what others write. However, after my last submission regarding the use of pseudonyms, I have decided to let that go. While I am still of the opnion that “false names” enourage and actually give people license to abuse and literally “cuss” each other at will, it is not my blog.
    As far as being in the struggle for donkey years, I remain steadfast , in my conviction, that Barbados seem to have been only discovered by some people last week. Regardless of how they try to dress it up, they know very little of the soico political/economic development of the island. That too I am letting go of because that really should not be my problem.
    As far as @ David is concerned, he deliberately allowed people to do as they like on BU because at that time it was convenient to his political leanings. That too I have let go of. It’s the truth.
    Well, it’s quite a few months that I have ignored the overseas” us and them thing” , that was also encouraged by the Blogmaster. I know where my navel string is buried.
    You said; “Unfortunately, however, I’ve never read at anytime where you expressed disapproval of that behaviour. You would either ignore or find some excuse to defend it.” I have never defended that behaviour. As recently as two or so weeks ago on BU, I told @Hal to desist from going that route. He will tell you it’s not the first time. I have also continuously disagreed withe him that Barbados is a failed state.
    So, there we have it , it’s not my blog and I am grateful for the opportunity to let my views be heard. However, I deeply appreciate your setting the record straight. Your suggestions and or advice are taken in the manner which they were given and I respect you for that. I am a known believer in good manners and you are blessed with an abundance.
    Keep up the good work
    The Real struggle continues


  26. “WS

    Roar like a lion – is powerful

    Bray like a donkey?????

    Which one would you like someone to say about you?”

    “As for JA / RH.
    I comfortable with anything. I hear cussing plenty everyday and will dish some if I have the feeling to – including braying

    No need to hide it and pretend.
    This is not church and the kids nowadays ain’t stupid and curse just as bad as adults when they are in their own company”

    Quite frankly I have been called a JA , RH and liar on BU so sometimes I kind of figure I am all of those things and more. They can call me whatever they feel like. You have your standards and I have mine.
    I don’t have to pretend. My friends know that I am very far left of center politically. However when it comes to proper decorum , I am unapologetically extremely conservative. So you and I will have to co-exist but my culture is not based on vulgarity and who don’t like um could lump um.
    I read where somebody on this same BU , try to defend people cussing out each other. I would like to be there , when one of their children call them a RH JA.in front of a house full of friends. I guess they will reply: FU or Foff.
    Pure nonsense and gallery. Like i said before I know what cussing is and what pure vulgarity and improper decorum to impress others is. Let them cuss me.
    Peace


  27. My last comment was directed toward @John2


  28. The “feel sorry for me woman”?

    Feel sorry for me for what?????
    As I have said before, I have everything I need and most of what I want! I am the one who thinks Barbados is not as bad as it is being portrayed compared to the rest of the world. I am the one being castigated for being too positive. I am the one who believes that we black people have the power to pool our resources and overcome. I am the one being called delusional for daring to be happy in Barbados. I am the one being told to step outside of my comfortable life to consider that my experience is not the average experience of life in Barbados. Funny thing is that it is not that I have not experienced problems. I could write a book. It is simply that I have finally come to understand that problems will always be a part of life. EVERY DAY, EVERY WHERE there is a mountain to climb. We need to stop whining and get to it.

    My only regret in life is that I wasted too much time in my younger days expecting a perfect life to fall into my lap. I was constantly baffled because I could not understand why people behaved so illogically. I spent too much time worrying about that and too little trying to find ways around them. I think we are making the same mistake here. There is much that we can do together to get around those who place obstacles in our path.

    You are a very stupid man if that translates to wanting somebody to feel sorry for me.

    If it is one thing I thought I had demonstrated here it is that I can stand my ground against ten of the best of you men. I have stood up against you all my life in every sphere. IN BLOODY PERSON. Most of my problems came from kicking against the pricks. I never accepted the admittedly mild sexism or racism I experienced when I recognized it as such. Not at home, not at school, not at work. Not anywhere! Never looked behind me for back up. Often fought alone. Instinctly and without compromise.

    I repeat for all those observing with one eye – Barbados, like every other country in the world has problems. We continue to fight through them. We will not ever be a perfect society but we must never stop striving to do better for all of our countrymen and women.

    And oh, I too shall continue to be who I am! I don’t need your permission. I have NEVER asked permission. That is how I earned the title – THE MAD WOMAN!

    So please, don’t feel sorry for me! I do appreciate empathy, and in some cases even sympathy but pity would get my goat!


  29. I have never once called William Skinner any names because you have never once called me a name. Furthermore, you and I want the same things but we have different ideas about the severity of the problem when compared to other countries. This is our only disagreement. But you seem to interpret this as my being not sufficiently aware of or concerned for the plight of the average Barbadian.

    You are wrong on both counts.

    Now, I have called Hal Austin many names because he is in the habit of calling Bajans who live here names.

    Who the hell does Hal Austin think he is? When it is not name calling it is snide remarks . Just last week he said that the tourists come here for the weather but certainly not the people. I let that pass at the time.

    But think about what that says, William Skinner!

    Was that directed at the powers that be, the politicians the white people, the Indians, all but the average Bajan as TheO once claimed?

    No, it was directed at the average Bajan whom he has often reminded us that his friend from England tries to avoid, and according to him, undertandably so!

    So… we are a people to be avoided – ALL of us. And I’ll tell you why. It is simply because we don’t hang on every word Hal Austin utters as though they are pearls of wisdom and we don’t hurry to follow his every suggestion.

    But every day I meet wonderful people on the streets of Barbados. Only last week a plastic bag of mine burst as I was leaving the supermarket and twelve bottles of Enterex hit the floor. Now, I am in my fifties, not too old to bend down but each time I tried to pick up one a lady in her twenties beat me to it.

    A few weeks ago I hopped out of a car in traffic with unbuckled shoes. Picked my way to safety on the pavement to buy a breadfruit. The two vendors, young men also in their twenties, chided me for the dangerous unbuckled shoes and bent down to buckle them before I could.

    These are the little things that make me smile whenever I venture out in Barbados. There is the occasional unpleasant encounter but the good outweighs the bad, several times over.

    But we are a people the tourists would not come to see and the returnees understandably avoid!

    Hal Austin has nothing good to say about ninety per cent of Barbadians who live on this rock. Those whom he considers worthy can be counted using fingers and toes.


  30. Now, with respect to “cussing” – you do you and we will do us. Nobody berates you for not cussing. My question is who declared these words to be cusswords? What is an asshole? What is a rasshole? What makes a word a cussword? What is the difference between calling somebody an idiot, a jackass, a wild beast, a savage etc. etc. etc.?

    And what is the difference between calling a person a jackass and saying that a person is braying?

    People do not bray. Jackasses bray. To bray one must first be a jackass.

    Six is still half dozen.


  31. And one last thing – your butterflies comment only emerged since you took issue with what you see as my rose spectacled view of Barbados. It is a response to my daily mention of the butterflies in my Garden of Peace.

    It is definitely a snide comment directed at somebody who has, and I paraphrase, now discovered Barbados, knows nothing about the socio-economic conditions and is trying to convince people who have been in the struggle for years.

    Peace.


  32. @ William

    I am sorry, but a couple weeks ago you asked me to desist from going ‘that route’. What route? Plse clarify.


  33. Told yall they will get these uppity Barbados governments on Black human rights abuses on day, they are vicious, anti-black and can’t help themselves, the believe that because it’s black people they rob, terrorize and abuse that no one anywhere clear, the nasty niga mind and they’ll never be held accountable, give the negros a colonial title, keys to the treasury, pension fund and access to the smiling faces of thieving criminal minorities…and they immediately sell out and off and running to violate black rights….they are going to be famous Enuff..

    the not too bright are yet to figure put that these social blights are a major problem and contributed significantly to the degradation of the whole slave society structure.


  34. Told yall they will get these uppity Barbados governments on Black human rights abuses ONE DAY, they are vicious, anti-black and can’t help themselves, they believe that because it’s black people they rob, terrorize and abuse that no one anywhere CARES, the nasty niga mind works like that and think that they’ll never be held accountable…dream on.


  35. Continue inviting in a bunch of infected diseased people from UK while everyone else is banning them…

    https://www.nationnews.com/2020/12/20/european-countries-place-travel-bans-uk/

    This excerpt is from another article.

    “Netherlands will ban flights carrying passengers from the United Kingdom from Sunday as Britain detected a new coronavirus strain.

    A travel ban will remain in place until January 1, the government said in a statement early Sunday, adding that it is monitoring developments and is considering additional measures regarding other modes of transport.

    Netherlands added that in early December, sampling of a case in the country had revealed the same virus strain as that found in the UK.

    In measures to control the spread of virus, government issued a “do not travel” advisory, unless it is absolutely essential.

    The ban came after UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson and scientists announced on Saturday that the new strain of coronavirus identified in the country is up to 70 per cent more infectious.”


  36. Would never trust parliament negros with mine or my family’s lives.

    “London – European nations have begun to apply travel bans with the United Kingdom (UK) after it reported a more infectious and “out of control” coronavirus variant.

    Ireland, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Belgium are all halting flights and travel. The measures vary and are initially generally short-term.

    A meeting of European Union countries will be held on Monday morning to discuss a more coordinated response.

    The new variant has spread quickly in London and south-east England.”


  37. Barbadians see govt as heroes
    What they dont see are the underlying cost of fighting thr virus which would soon bite them in the arse
    In my humble opinion all borders should have been closed for a year with the exception of cargo flights done by the military transporting food and medical supplies to poor countries
    These closure would have given govt a free hand to fight the virus without having all this overloaded cost and in meanwhile force to build on homegrown policies to keep their economies moving


  38. Heroes?????


  39. Moore: Return to CTUSAB possible
    THE DOOR has not been closed on an eventual reunion of the Barbados Workers’ Union (BWU) and the Congress of Trade Unions and Staff Associations of Barbados (CTUSAB).
    The BWU seceded CTUSAB in 2013, with then general secretary Sir Roy Trotman outlining several reasons why the decision was made, one notably being what he said was a move to prevent the BWU from representing Barbados at the International Labour Organisation session in Geneva, Switzerland.
    Moore said she did not want to rehash the “ugly stuff” of the past but acknowledged unions were at their strongest as one.
    “Unity is strength, therefore any opportunity to explore strength in unity is always welcome,” she said on Starcom Network’s Sunday Brass Tacks yesterday.
    “I believe the time will come where it will be possible to regain that strength. I believe with the change in focus of the leadership in the respective organisations to a true commitment to workers and to rekindle unity and draw from the strength in that unity, we will get there. I’m optimistic.”
    Moore cautioned that things were not always as they appeared, and there should be no assumption that a divergence of viewpoints was a sign of discomfort.
    “From time to time, views will diverge but that is a passing thing,” she said.
    Moore added she was seeing trends among unions which she did not approve of.
    “As unions, we need to meet and combine our energies. Unions in our system seem to be diverging from how unions in other places operate and are expected to operate.
    “Unions don’t tear each other down publicly but that is something emerging here and that will continue to make it a lot harder for the kind of unity we want to pursue,” she said. ( CA)

    Source: Nation


  40. @ Donna

    There’s an ‘old saying’ that ghosts usually come out at 12 midnight. So, understandably, at 12:10 AM in the morning, when I saw the name “Observer” on BU, I became a bit scared because I thought another contributor held a séance in the forum and raised the late calypsonian ‘Observer’ from the dead.

    I made a ‘sign of the Cross’ and he immediately disappeared.


  41. Very perceptive.


  42. David & Artax

    Indeed I thought it was strange that Observing would appear just to make such a nasty comment. We do have a real Observing, don’t we? Never saw him attack in such a nasty manner. Our interactions have always been pleasant.

    What did he call you – a block limer? Somebody said that recently but I cannot remember who. My “feel sorry for me” label was also used some months ago. I have an idea who said it but I don’t want to call the wrong name or he will come out blazing in ALL CAPS.

    Also the “continue to be who you are” was this same person’s words to Hal not long ago.

    Miss Marple’s nose did smell that rat!

    My, my, my! A sneaky rat! But not sneaky enough!


  43. Fact Check:

    That was not TheRealObserving.


  44. @ Donna

    There is only one individual who keeps making references to me ‘liming on the block’ and my ‘block friends.’ He also always uses terms such as “the feel sorry for me woman” to describe you. It’s all that ‘he came out of character’ on this occasion to attack us.

    He is a known ass kisser of one the guys he mentioned. Obviously, emotion would cause him to instinctively emphasize that ‘respect’ by using his trademark choice of lettering to write the guy’s name.


  45. WS
    I did interpret it as allowed from your very first post and my point remains–party supporters are also poor and deserving of public housing too. The fact is that demand for government-assisted housing/land outstrips supply and will continue to be the case for many reasons including, most notably, the lack of any substantial private sector involvement in providing low-income housing. Who calls who or who is “perhaps” not on a list is primary school reasoning. From what I have read, the current government has started to address this through indirect contributions by the private sector. Instead of grandstanding on BU, maybe you (Mahogany Court) and Hal Austin should establish a company to do just that–provide low-income housing so poor people wouldn’t be allowed to squat for votes. By the way are you accusing your dear friend Comrade Prescod of encouraging/allowing squatting for votes? What a ting!!


  46. The shape shifter cannot hide behind his 3 degrees.

    Just observing lol


  47. David,

    I know. It was Baje.


  48. John 2,

    Spot on! Dishonest fellow, isn’t he?


  49. WW

    The kids know what is a cuss word and when to and when not to use them

    I repeat. They mostly use them amoung their peers.

    There are exposed to cursing all over
    The tv, rumshop, streets, cricket, basketball etc

    RH and JA are mild. The older kids got their own codes for their own brand of cursing that some adults don’t even understand


  50. @ Enuff
    I can’t answer for @ Hal but I have no personal business interest in construction. As for Comrade Prescod, he has been politically neutered. It’s the path he chose. I chose mine and you know I got slaughtered. He is his own man.
    I am happy to learn that your party and government are no longer corrupt. Please tell them , when entering deals with housing and the private sector to build proper size houses and complete the interiors with basic things such as cupboards.
    @ Donna
    I gave a very clear reason why I use the term chasing butterflies. I can’t respond to that any further.
    I no longer care about who use colorful language. I don’t own BU.
    Philosophically you are in line with how most Bajans see development. I think that works for most of us.
    Quite frankly, Barbados is not my major focus. I am still trying to assist in creating a true One Caribbean Nation State.
    I see no tremendous hope under the BLPDLP. They don’t have the talent nor the collective leadership to do anymore or any less of what they have been doing for nearly sixty years.
    The lack of creative and innovative policy has been embarrassingly exposed in the last Throne Speech and before that the endless blundering of Stuart and company. That’s my personal view.

    The real struggle continues
    Peace

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading