Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The unemployment situation in St George North is dreadful.  Disappointing voters with false promises is not an option in this by-election.  Candidates must offer workable plans, to effectively address the mass unemployment problems in St George North.

There are six candidates seeking to work for the people of St George North, for the next 30 months.   It is important that none of us follow the bad examples of those who have gone before us.

Candidates who plan to use the desperate unemployed people of St George North as pawns, just to secure a seat in the House of Assembly for their party, are doing the unconscionable.  They are ensuring that the people continue to suffer, during these exceptionally difficult times.  The present suffering is compounded by an unnecessary IMF austerity program, and a global COVID-19 pandemic.

Candidates who make promises that they know they cannot keep, are deceiving voters’ families.  Candidates who know that they have no capacity to implement their party’s plans, push that deceit beyond tolerable levels.

Career politicians have repeatedly broken their promises to previous generations of voters.  Those voters had the patience to tolerate and forgive those, who repeatedly deceived them with empty promises.
The current generation of young voters are different – they will not forgive that type of deceit.  Candidates without any workable economic plans for the families of St George North, are playing with fire.

Audio Version

Grenville Phillips II is a Chartered Structural Engineer, and the Solutions Barbados’ candidate for St George North.  He can be reached at NextParty246@gmail.com


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

545 responses to “Solutions Barbados – Playing With Fire”


  1. Lorenzo u ought to be the last asking about Reifer plans for SGN I remember clearly in the 10 year opposition of the blp
    They gave no plans however made many promises which have all turned out to be empty with exception to one that of the South West sewage problem whereby govt has emptied all the toxins in the ocean
    Now u come here talking about Reifer plan
    Btw what are govt plans to rescue small business and stop bridgetown from become barbados largset dump site
    If yuh dont hsve an answer ask Mottley


  2. As the Dem Designate I will answer on behalf of the lady. The roads were not fixed because the Minister of Road Wuk was not the MP for that constituency.

    Perhaps if she had fixed him up he would have fixed her roads.

    No wuk without wuk!

  3. Michael Campbell Avatar
    Michael Campbell

    Mariposa, you could give me 3 reasons why government should rescue small businesses in Bridgetown?


  4. If I was in Reifer’s shoes they couldn’t catch me on a debate stage, why you ask? His opponent has been around the block in her role as a Union leader for decades and is accustomed to the cut and thrust of debating while I am an idiot who plays cricket. Let the leaders debate when national elections are called in by elections it is all local.


  5. Dem yardie Donna when Ms Bywr_ Suckoo was in cabinet for ten years Mr Clarke was in opposition bird brain she had the power to get roads fixed in the south and north in St Goerge so do not bring no red herring about wuk for wuk as you clearly fo not know what you talking about in your rush to defend Ms Byer_ Suckoo and the Dems.


  6. @David,

    and?


  7. Maybe, just maybe acolytes see a task to be completed.


  8. @David

    given my first response to you about Wood that makes no sense and ignores the Wood/ Weir situation


  9. The Wood/Weir spat is a mere distraction in the opinion of the blogmaster. Wood being opportunistic for political expediency sake.


  10. @Sargeant

    Theoretically a reasonable position but how practical if Reifer is exposed as the only candidate to decline participation?


  11. @David

    now that is a more reasonable explanation and may be closer to the truth. it is telling that MAM and the BLP havent addressed the Wood issue yet but stay tune that is coming.

    when this issue about debates came up, i said very early that Reifer should not participate in a televised debate. what is the point? this is a by election. if there should be any televised debates reserve it for the general elections between the leaders or their surrogates.

    most elections are local especially those in St George, and should be fought in the trenches. Reifer is doing a good job there. that is where his advantage, if he has any, lies


  12. @Greene

    The prime minister pulls on members of parliament to participate in Cabinet. If Reifer were to win he will have the awesome and challenging job to ensure the opposition’s dissenting voice strident and cogent. On this basis why shouldn’t he want to parade a wider grasp of the issues confronting the country and even beyond?

  13. William Skinner Avatar

    Union wants new law amended
    by Randy Bennett
    The National Union of Public Workers’ (NUPW) wants Government to go back to the drawing board with its recently legislated Public Service Appointment Act.
    Charging that too many of its members were being disadvantaged due to the strict requirements of the Act, NUPW’s Acting General Secretary Delcia Burke wants the legislation amended so a larger number of public servants could benefit.
    Under the new provisions in the legislation, which was passed just over two weeks ago, persons who were not appointed to the public service but who had been employed in a temporary position or an established position for three years or more immediately before October 1, 2020, were deemed to be appointed.
    Additionally, persons who had been acting in a post for three years or more before October 1, 2020, were also appointed.
    But in an interview with Barbados TODAY, Burke, who heads the island’s largest public sector union, proposed that Government amend the legislation so public servants who had acted in positions for three years or more at any point in time would be eligible to be appointed.
    She said while she was happy to see some persons being appointed, there were still too many deserving of appointments being left out in the cold.
    “I don’t know how many people were appointed but I know a number of our members have not been appointed after acting in positions for 12, 13, 14 years, only due to the fact that they were promoted to act in a higher position but were not in the position for three years.
    “The NUPW feels that they should amend the Act to say that anybody who has been acting in the public service for three years, regardless of if you served two years in one position and one year in another, or 13 in one position and then two in another,” Burke contended.
    “It has placed a number of our members and other public servants at a serious disadvantage. You came up with something that gives people hope, saying that so many people are going to be appointed, only to understand that a number of persons don’t qualify based on what the Act says.”
    In piloting the legislation, Attorney General Dale Marshall disclosed that any public servant who wished to make an appeal could do so to the Governor General.
    However, Burke also questioned that decision, saying it did not give workers a fair chance.
    “They have given persons the option to appeal to the Governor General if they feel they have been prejudiced by the Act. But the Act is very specific as to who can be appointed so I want to know how the Governor General is going to do something other than what the Act says when the Act is there written in law. I don’t understand how that is going to happen,” she pointed out.
    “What I also don’t understand is that anybody who appeals can lose an appeal.
    What happens if persons lose those appeals? What are they going to do because there is nowhere else to turn. You have a disciplinary and a grievance procedure in the Public Service Act that talks about dealing with
    issues and grievances. Why can’t you follow that grievance procedure? Why do you have to go and appeal to the Governor General,” Burke further questioned.
    (randybennett@barbadostoday.bb)


  14. bAJE

    wHAT insider what?

    glyne clarke is on the inside now and if he come out and say MM is the best of everything ever he would be a liar / dont have no balls / a yardfowl etc.

    Wood lining up his political ducks (which your are to blind to see) and an ignorant blind ass like you will call it TRUTH

    OA spoke the TRUTH for about 10yrs and she still became PM, as soon as she offer he a pick i aint any refusal or i aint hear another word of TRUTH from his mouth.


  15. Donna

    UPP is AO other BLP party. woods would fit right in and right at the top. he “wood” bring ministerial experience to assist lynette.


  16. @David,

    when and if that time comes he will be ready


  17. lorenzo
    she didnt fix any roads that why she got such a whipping in 20018. not only her but ALL DEM


  18. leave donna alone she would like some of the wuk to get her road fixed


  19. @Greene

    Hope you are not saying the electorate should operate on to a wing and a prayer by buying a pig in a bag.


  20. @John2

    You can do better.


  21. dAVID?

    yOU DONT THINK DONNA CAN DO BETTER ? or are you sexist?


  22. You agree that better can come from you or are you controlled by others.


  23. is that a question?

    i didnt see you answer the one that was addressed to you


  24. is televised debating a measure by which Bim elects its politicians?


  25. Carry on John2. The blogmaster made his point.

    >


  26. “Take de easy riddle to solve
    You must always stay involved
    Scratch yuh head an’ give it a try
    Tell me – who are what am I?”

    Bam!

    BLP Wuk fuh Wuk 1 get old. DLP Wuk fuh Wuk 2 tek ovuh.

    I knew that would confuse the fowl cocks.


  27. @Greene

    What are the alternatives to allow candidates to showcase their perspectives on the issues as a collective in an independent setting?

    >


  28. Campbell just in case you were born yesterday
    There was an era and time when small businesses were part of the economy stimulus
    But back then govts cared
    Now all we have are govt throwing millions into a one nest basket that shows its ina
    Inabilty to survive when the pressure of a global economy punctured its tires
    So why cannt govt save these business


  29. @ Mr. Skinner

    Everyday, GIS notices are aired via the media, in which public sector employees who felt they were disadvantaged by the Public Service Appointment Act, are asked to contact the Civil Service Ministry.

    And, the NUPW is now seeking to represent its membership?


  30. dAVID

    wAITTTTT you scared of donna? or are you really sexist?

  31. Michael Campbell Avatar
    Michael Campbell

    Mariposa, if I born yesterday or not, ain’t got nothing to do with it. You still ain’t answer my question.

    All I ask you is to give me 3 reasons WHY government should rescue small businesses in Bridgetown?


  32. @David,

    i dont understand what you are asking.

    however, parliamentary debates are where issues are debated and resolved. until then Reifer should stick to house to house campaigning, shop crawls and spot meetings. that is where this election will be won or lost.


  33. @ MARIPOSA

    In most developed economies, small businesses provide more jobs than any other sector. That is why government should support small businesses.
    Whey they should not do is take taxpayers’ money and give to privately-owned hotel owners without any proper audit.


  34. @Greene

    The public is not s ignorant as in days of old. Social media coupled with suffocating political apathy has been encouraging the public to be more demanding of politicians. The days of one dimensional campaigning (interactions) is old school.


  35. greene

    i agree with you – sorta. as you said that his strong point and debating “seems” to be his week point and he needs all the votes he can get. why chance a debate ?


  36. Where was it stated government will be giving money to hotels without due diligence?


  37. on the other hand ….. if all the others do the debate the………… he still will hold some licks for a no show.


  38. @Greene

    You have not addressed the point if Reifer is the only candidate deciding to not participate what do you see as political fallout if any.


  39. Wuh evuhbody know dat Dumb Donna too dumb tuh do better!

    De only ting she good fuh is to pull little boy puppet strings an’ mek he expose heself!

    Watch de puppet!

    Pull – crap!
    Pull – crap!
    Pull – crap!

    David knows that I will let sleeping yardfowl puppets lie when they stop trying to pick apart every comment I make because of some stupid grudge from more than a week ago for which I apologised if I had misjudged them.

    You have most childishly stalked me since then trying to prove me wrong about every little thing.

    So Teacher Donna thought to teach the little boy some nursery rhymes.

    And, silly boy, David knows that I am not Baje.


  40. You can ad delusional to the other 2 Ds
    You dont even realise when you walk into ur own crap. i does just spread it out (using ur words) and you does step right into it


  41. @ Greene

    Hope this is the right stream. But a television debate is showbiz, an import from the US. But it will not expand the general knowledge of the people in St George North.
    A television debate with badly informed journalists asking irrelevant questions may provide cheap laughs for some people, but it will not get us anywhere. However, it would be good for CBC viewer numbers.
    What the people want and need is a meeting in a school hall, with all the candidates, sitting at a table and answering questions from the electorate.


  42. If the debate comes off it will be with David Ellis as the interviewer.

    >


  43. All hail the puppet mistress! Or master.

    We must ask the original Johnnie to run it through the sex analyzer!

    Are we done now?


  44. Uh-oh! Not yet?

    Mamma Mia had a farm

    E-I-E-I-O

    And on that farm she had some fowls

    E-I-E-I-O

    With a crap crap here
    And a crap crap there
    Here a crap, there a crap
    Everywhere a crap crap

    Johnnie 2 on Mia Farms
    Crappy Crappy
    Oh!

    You may have the last crap! You are better at it than I am!

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    Changing channels……..

  45. Michael Campbell Avatar

    Oh, now I get it.

    The Barbados government should support small businesses, BECAUSE in most developed economies, small businesses provide more jobs than any other sector.

    The privately owned hotel owners PAY MORE IN taxes and VAT than small businesses owner. That make them TAXPAYERS, too.

    So, it would be some of THEIR TAX MONEY that they would be getting back from the government.

    So, the same way you could take up taxpayers’ money to support small businesses, why you can’t support the small hotel owners too?


  46. why would you need a sex analyser? i used ur own word exactly how you used/meant them

    ur so dumb you hav to analyse the sex of ur own words?

    whaloss


  47. @David,

    i dont get you at all. did the 30 candidates that won for the BLP participate in televised debates during the general elections?


  48. @Hal

    the yanks call that a town hall. during house to house campaigning the same can be achieved. i dont have an issue with leaders participating in televised debates but i cant see the reason why a by election has to follow that protocol.

    it seems excessive and a colossal waste of time and money


  49. greene
    For a government money is not wasted its circulated which is good for them. you dint listen to VC ?


  50. not hitting at VC (as some may think) but agreeing 100%

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading