Prime Minister Mia Mottley Appoints Cabinet

Prime Minister Mia Mottley has hit the ground running and less than 48 hours after receiving an overwhelming mandate to govern, she appointed her Cabinet. It is a large Cabinet but one can argue two points 1. the enormity of the task requires the resources to efficiently manage, AND, there is the politics, she has 30 members to manage! As she solidifies her powerbase one expects she will consolidate as required or face the political fallout. The blogmaster will be fair and allow a few weeks for the BLP action plan to emerge before critique.


Full list of Ministers:

  • Prime Minister Minister of Finance, Economic Affairs and Investment – Mia Mottley
  • Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs – Dale Marshall
  • Minister of Education, Technological and Vocational Training and Leader of Government Business – Santia Bradshaw
  • Minister of Housing, Lands and Rural Development – George Payne
  • Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade and Leader of Government Business in the Senate – Senator Dr Jerome Walcott
  • Minister of International Business and Industry – Ronald Toppin
  • Minister of Environment and National Beautification – Trevor Prescod
  • Minister of People Empowerment and Elder Affairs – Cynthia Forde
  • Minister of Tourism and International Transport – Kerrie Symmonds
  • Minister of Transport Works and Maintenance  – Dr William Duguid
  • Minister of Health and Wellness – Jeffrey Bostic
  • Minister of Home Affairs – Edmund Hinkson
  • Minister of Small Business, Entrepreneurship and Commerce – Dwight Sutherland
  • Minister of Energy and Water Resources – Wilfred Abrahams
  • Minister in the Ministry of Finance – Ryan Straughn
  • Minister in the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Investment – Marsha Caddle
  • Minister in the Ministry of Foreign Trade – Sandra Husbands
  • Minister of Labour and Social Partnership Relations – Colin Jordan
  • Minister in the Ministry of Housing, Lands and Rural Development – Charles Griffith
  • Minister of Youth and Community Empowerment – Adrian Forde
  • Minister of Maritime Affairs and the Blue Economy – Kirk Humphrey
  • Minister of Agriculture and Food Security – Indar Weir
  • Minister in the Ministry of Transport Works and Maintenance – Peter Phillips
  • Minister of the Creative Economy, Culture and Sports – John King
  • Minister of Innovation, Science and Smart Technology – Senator Kay McConney
  • Minister of Information, Broadcasting and Public Affairs- Senator Lucille Moe


Full list of Senators:

  • Senator Sir Richard Cheltenham
  • Senator Rudolph ‘Cappy’ Greenidge
  • Senator Dr Jerome Walcott
  • Senator Kay McConney
  • Senator Lucille Moe
  • Senator Rawdon Adams
  • Senator Lisa Cummins
  • Senator Rudy Grant
  • Senator Dr Rommel Springer
  • Senator Lynette Holder
  • Senator Damien Sands
  • Senator Dr Chrystal Haynes

Related information:

  • Arthur Holder – Speaker of the House
  • Glyne Clarke – Deputy Speaker
  • Sonia Browne – Chairman of Committees
  • Ambassador at Large and Plenipotentiary – Dame Billie Miller
  • Ambassador/Chief Economic Counsellor in the ministry of finance – Clyde Mascoll
  • Jessica Odle-Baril – Prime Minister’s Personal Aide
  • Pat Parris – Director of Public Affairs (to replace traditional press secretary)
  • TBD – Director of Communications
  • TBD – Czars in critical areas


  • Will she and some of her people not be donating their salaries to charities like Donald trump and his people have??? I would hate to think that some old white guy thinks more of his countries success than bajans do


  • This is a reminder to those who are paying attention: Civil servants were part of the electorate and are waiting patiently for the fulfilment of the election promises as well as the forgotten appointments. For the last 10 years, apart from January 01,2008 when appoints were left as a mandate by the Owen Arthur Administration, the only appointments we’ve had were the political ones that were advertised and filled. There are persons who missed out that were acting from February 01, 2005 until today. They too, need some consideration.


  • @C_Salt

    Good comment, the approach of the former government to dealing with public servant salaries by issuing a statement to remove wage increase offer from the table. Can anyone explain it? It can be described as self-defeating.

    Liked by 1 person

  • Bro did you read the IMF report. Keep waiting. But HOPE is not lost since Mia with a stroke of a pen on first day in office can find 8million to create new jobs for ministers . Maybe there is HOPE for wunna


  • Eh eh. Jobs for the boys and girls. A bad sign in the first 36 hours. Why wheel out Johnny Cheltenham again? What has he got to contribute to a modern and dynamic society? Cappy Greenidge, Rawdon Adams (what has he contributed to Barbadian society? And he is conceited enough to accept the offer), Rudy Grant – these appointments smack of “it is we turn now”.
    As I feared, it looks like more of the same.


  • Mariposa, Fractured et al (DLP fanatics), console yourselves that any additional money that has to come from the treasury should not be cause for concern. Why, you ask? Simple economics that even your late and not great economic guru a.k.a. MoF (minister of foolishness?) could explain; subtract the total cost of new ministries from the massive hemorrhaging, leakage and redirection of government funds that miraculously disappeared on a recurring basis and you will see that there is enough money left over for 25 more ministries.

    I have no doubt that there will be many stumbles and failures with the new government over time. They have been cut from the same cloth as all the rest of us (including lepers) but now is not the time for childish and imbecilic tantrums as is seen on here. Give it time and you too will be able to have something realistic to gloat about but put a sock on it for now before you appear and make greater asses of yourselves.

    I am not normally one given to spitefulness but it is my opinion that the thirty zeros who were just dismissed should not be the only ones to be punished. Anyone who voted for the Dems in the last election intended to harm Barbados and all Barbadians by supporting their reelection. You saw what they did to Barbados, you knew that they intended to do more of the same and you willfully went ahead and supported that callous band of conniving b**ches. You are as guilty as every one of them and should be treated as an equal traitor.


  • @ David
    Nice one from Jeremiah Boss…. Bushie is impressed.

    However, you need to read on…
    “Then you will call on me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you.
    You will seek me and find me
    when you seek me with all your heart.
    I will be found by you,”

    It is called sackcloth and ashes.
    It requires an honest appreciation of the brassbowlery with which we are currently consumed
    … a genuine repentance – and a desire to pursue righteousness instead of selfish wickedness.

    Bushie simply calls it the ‘lifeboat’
    …the means by which BBE’s CHOSEN people will be returned to their true roots…..

    Honestly Boss…. do you see us being ANYWHERE near to such an enlightened position?
    …or do you agree that only when the water is up to our brass bowl necks will we ‘see the true light’…?

    @ nineofnine
    If Czars are to be nothing more than the shiite ‘consultants’ that we have had bleeding the treasury for the last 25 years why are we even talking about it….?
    If Tzars are to be more like the Russian variety – with POWER to execute, why do we still need the shiite ministers interfering in the business aspect of our country’s operations?
    ….unless this just a novel name for the process of sharing out the spoils to the yardfowls?

    @ Tron
    There IS a VERY BRIGHT side to all this….
    Why do you think the model PRAYER given to BBE’s people almost starts with the wish that ‘…thy Kingdom come..”?
    The news is bad for those without hope…. whose faith is in money and power…
    Remember that those who boarded the Titanic’s lifeboats were quickly picked up …and hustled off to the NEW CITY….. 🙂


  • @Bushie

    Will leave you to the SMEs on theology on the blog.


  • @ David
    …you mean the Trinity?
    ha ha ha


  • Where is Caswell Franklyn ? his input is welcome, Walter Blackman you hear the news ?


  • TheophiliusGazerts

    ” have no doubt that there will be many stumbles and failures with the new government over time. They have been cut from the same cloth as all the rest of us (including lepers) but now is not the time for childish and imbecilic tantrums as is seen on here. Give it time and you too will be able to have something realistic to gloat about but put a sock on it for now before you appear and make greater asses of yourselves.

    I am not normally one given to spitefulness but it is my opinion that the thirty zeros who were just dismissed should not be the only ones to be punished. Anyone who voted for the Dems in the last election intended to harm Barbados and all Barbadians by supporting their reelection. You saw what they did to Barbados, you knew that they intended to do more of the same and you willfully went ahead and supported that callous band of conniving b**ches. You are as guilty as every one of them and should be treated as an equal traitor.”

    If that is your vision for the future of Barbados or your interpretation of the outcome of the elections, then heaven hep us all. It seems as if you have little confidence in the new leaders and is only bent on being vindictive and spiteful. Groundhog day is on us.


  • TheophiliusGazerts

    Mariposa needs to give Mia a chance.


  • Some mariposa is being called a traitor and should be guillotine . Shades of dictatorship has started leaking from the vessel MIA carrying its supporters
    Soon we shall see how this all.plays out.


  • The results of the election must be interpreted as a vote against the DLP. Mia will have to show that her team is equipped to make good use of the opportunity.


  • Mia can do as she dam please without a viable oposition she can use any formula to move the country forward she has no one standing in her way
    The dlp supporters stayed away from the polls which help paved the way for a one party system of governance a system which is as close to a dictatorship ever witnessed in barbados
    Barbados is in new territorial waters and wherever the chip falls they are ours to deal with.


  • pieceuhderockyeahright

    @ The Honourable Blogmaster.

    That is all it is “a vote against the DLP ” because realistically speaking few of the new lot have any experience at their substantive ministries

    @ Brother in Arms Bush Tea

    You are correct that the minister and tsar dual tier will bring a host of cuntsultants to the fore

    But where I differ in my evaluation of the circumstances is thst Madamoiselle Prime Minister Mottley has been planning this dual tier mechanism for a while

    She comprehend that these ministers are green and LEFT TO THEMSELVES will fail!

    And Madamoiselle Prime Minister will not fail.

    @ FearPlay

    What sort of bogus reasoning is that you just put here?

    You said and I quote “subtract the total cost of new ministries from the massive hemorrhaging, leakage and redirection of government funds that miraculously disappeared on a recurring basis and you will see that there is enough money left over for 25 more ministries…”

    You have a crystal ball?

    How the France you ent even get into the financials yet but you declaring that people going see there is enough money…



  • David do you know what was the percentage of the voter turn out?


  • 150, 990 voted, do the math based on the number on the voters list. Approximately 60% voter turnout.


  • It is noteworthy that MORE persons voted in 2013 than in 2018. The voter turnout was about 2% lower in 2018 than in 2013.


  • ok thanks david.I don’t know how that factors with past years to make a comparison but I don’t consider that alarmingly low.


  • Given the level of disaffection in the last 5 years- to pick a period- to have experienced the lowest voter turnout in our history says something doesn’t it?

    On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Barbados Underground wrote:



  • Sorry just saw your comment Pong.It would be nice to have the percentage turn out for at least the past 4 elections: 2003,2008,2013,2018.

    Of note however is the fact that if the people were so motivated to vote for the BLP which according to all pundits – this was the right environment,it is very telling that the turn out was lower than 2013 which I suspect would have been lower than 2013.

    It is clear there was voter apathy and the people were not enamoured with Mia and the blp nor the Dems.


  • @T.Inniss

    You know how to Google?

    2003 – 60.8%

    2008 – 63.0%

    2013 – 62.0%

    2018 – 60.0%

    We agree the 70% vote for the BLP was a rejection of the DLP rather than voting for the BLP.


  • de pedantic Dribbler

    David Mr Blogmaster, blogger Doc Martin gave a link for Caribbean elections results but any Google search would return credible sites… not sure why the data queries!

    Anyhow, we can use stats to create ANY spin we desire if we are shrewd and some of the above remarks trend in that direction.

    As was noted yesterday, our nation (according to Electoral & Boundaries Com data) has not surpased 65% (in that range, dont have the actual # before me) voter turnout since late ’70s. So yes it’s accurate that this year’s 60% may be low BUT it’s very much well within the 62%-64% turnout in last 30 years.

    We have dismissed govt twice in this way….with these turnouts! …. So yes the zero seats for DLP is unprecedented but it is also UNPRECEDENTED that any Bdos government had shiiittee flowing in our streets and lied about, obfuscated and incompetently mismanaged the problem.

    The statistical details of this election are really not as unexpected (they are startling and without precedent, true) as they may appear at first blush…just study the numbers.


  • A tribute to our last PM Stuart


  • Thanks David.

    Those numbers makes perfect sense and line up with my thinking on the matter if we reflect on the mood of the populace at the various periods.

    2003 people were moving away from Arthur and the blp but the DLP had not fully gotten their act together and therefore was not seen as a reliable option AT THAT TIME.

    By 2008 once again the talk of massive corruption & wastage with the blp, via the unprecedented cost over runs in almost every project,the growing arrogance of the administration etc all led to a foregone conclusion that there would be a change in government.

    2013 people had sympathy for the administration following the death of Thompson and the rough economic situation they met when they came in 2008.Plus there was the factor of the second poll done by Wickham which silent dems found offensive and so people who had intended to stay out 2013 election came out to vote to register their dissatisfaction.

    I have my views about this 2018 elections which I am still pondering on and fleshing out but it is clear to me that this was not a vote to put the first female PM or even a vote for the Bees – because everytime a man – in – the -street poll was done a large majority of the voters said they were fed up with both parties.This really was a strong vote against the dems for their various mis-steps and mis-calculations.

    Sorry to have to say it but people are going to sour on this government real early because of what I believe will be some bold ‘in your face’ actions ( aleady seen by the largest cabinet in Barbados history) which would have contradicted all that they and the academics at Cave Hill,the private sector people,Unions,media practioners and others have been lambasting the last government for.

    There is no euphoria in this victory and even the day after people kept saying there was a strange atmosphere in the air as though people were now coming to terms with what they have done and the implications of their actions.

    I for one will be watching the constitution with a keen eye.I trust the Underground family will do the same and I am particularly referring to those who have Country at heart and not party.

    Last advice to the dems who have been blogging on this site you need to up your game and don’t reduce your part any further.Think through your arguments before you make them.Forget those who clog up this site with multiple posts saying sweet nothing – we need reasoned arguments right now not nuisances.


  • sorry – reduce your party any further *


  • @T.Inniss

    Time will tell, let us hope this government will rise to the occasion. To whom much is give a hell of a lot is expected.

    Liked by 1 person

  • Cant disagree with that David.


  • Every newly elected Gov’t is entitled to a “Honey Moon” period but the large number of Ministers left a sour taste in my mouth, no amount of pretzel twisting themselves into knots by Gov’t members or supporters in justification of those numbers will change my opinion. In my view it is a self- inflicted wound, the numbers were bad before, they are horrendous now.

    Liked by 1 person

  • From a very superficial review of electoral data from 1994 to 2018 I have come to the following conclusions; the average %voter turnout is about 62%, the average support for the BLP was 55% and for the DLP 45%. The BLP support has been more consistent while the DLP support has been quite variable. This contradicts the view that Barbados is DLP country. I would hypothesize that the BLP can count on at least 40% support of active voters regardless of the party’s performance in or out of government. The DLP should be very concerned because it appears to me to that it no longer enjoys committed through-thick-or-thin support. Should the BLP under Ms Mottley perform well (as is expected) over the next five years, the BLP will not only solidify their committed support but the DLP may actually disappear as a serious electoral force.

    The consistent 40% of the electorate that do not vote may be an attractive electoral target BUT much research and analysis needs to done to understand why these persons do not vote.


  • @ Sargeant who wrote ” entitled to a “Honey Moon” period ”

    PM Mottley said they are ” hitting the ground running “.

    They don’t want no honeymoon. If they ” running ” we should be chasing. lol


  • I truly want the BLP to be successful. I need Barbados to have a stable economy.

    I don’t want a devaluation of the Barbados dollar.

    I want to dispose of all I have left in Barbados even if I have to live in Barbados for 180 days.

    Sarge yuh get my drift ?


  • As Bajans we should all be proud, the people have spoken, we sent a clear message to all of our politicians that we are their masters and employers, and when we entrusted them with a job they must do it properly for the benefit of all of the people otherwise we will sack them at the earliest opportunity, You voted in BLP in every constituency 30 out of 30 which is ample prove that you were very unhappy with the way the DLP government was running the country,

    Let us give the newly elected government and MP’s our support and encouragement. 26 Ministers with accountability to you via the Prime Minister, supported by 9 other personnel are not too much, They will save our country far more money than their salaries millions time over . Just think a school with 250 students have

    a Head Master, a Deputy Head Master. 3 or 4 Senior Assistants, Head of Infants , Head of Junior .Head of Senior , Head of English Languages. Head of French, Head of Spanish, Head of Maths Head of Sciences , Head of Woodwork etc, etc

    Let us work to help Mia Motley and her ministers to turn around and clean up the mess our country is currently in . Remember our country is blessed, together we can do it without any hardship to anyone


  • CBC is showing a Korean movie! Once again I have to go to you tube to see the swearing in of the Cabinet! What is CBC good for?


  • @gingerbeerman:
    ” 26 Ministers with accountability to you via the Prime Minister, supported by 9 other personnel are not too much, They will save our country far more money than their salaries millions time over”

    Patent nonsense. Do you believe this?


  • As in the former, one Minister overseeing a host of priority areas promoted negligence to some, wastage in others. CAN’T BULDOZE A MOUNTAIN WITH A SHOVEL especially in a MISSION CRITICAL SITUATION within a specific timeframe.


  • yes .I believe this , you are looking over a year or in the short time, I am looking over the long term


  • Kenneth,

    26 ministers are not enough. We need at the very least 150 ministers, since Barbados is a continent with 2 billion citizens.

    I am also very, very confident that foreign investments will return to finance the lavish lifestyle of the not so motivated Barbadian workforce. A wage hike for civil servants is also no problem. We have just to print new Barbados-Dollars.


  • Mr BLOGMASTER SIR, where did Wilys comment from this blog disappear too, BLP EDITING ?


  • The poorer Barbados, the bigger the cabinet.

    Welcome to Mozambique.


  • @Lawson May 27, 2018 7:47 AM “Will she and some of her people not be donating their salaries to charities like Donald trump and his people have?”

    So any of the new people are billionaires?

    And how many people did Donald Trump and his companies NOT PAY during multiple bankruptcies?


  • @Bush Tea May 27, 2018 12:02 AM “Now do some research and let us know which countries with 150% debt, no assets left, piss poor productivity, financial reports in a total mess with some audited accounts YEARS behind while the auditor general screams about huge discrepancies EVERY year Sewerage on the tourists streets and beaches dozens of abandoned buildings a court system that has failed sugar cane industry dead etc, etc etc….have returned to growth and prosperity equal to that it enjoyed during the years of borrowing and grants ….and tell us which have essentially ‘died’. Better yet tell David (cause Bushie done know)”


    At multiple times in its history.

    Because we are neither brassbowls, wrasse wholes, nor do we “like it so”


  • Ms. Mottley has not claimed to be the second coming of Christ.

    Nor has she promised manna from heaven.

    She has said plainly that there will be some years ahead.

    And she has promised good governance.

    We are willing to work hard with her.

    If she does not deliver on good governance, she knows clearly that we will fix her as we fixed Freundel and his team on Thursday morning [their tails were done fixed by noon on Thursday] . Ms. Mottley asked for the job. Now she HAS TO do the WORK.

    She is smart enough to know that she is already on notice.


  • No Simple she is not the second coming of Christ but she dod make claims to be the Saviour of BArbados
    Six of one half dozen of another


  • @ Mariposa
    What the hell are you now?
    Yuh can’t be a yardfowl – cause wunna no longer have a yard….after that 30-0
    Yet you still round the place shitting ….and making everyone miserable…

    Oh Wait…

    Are you now one of those ‘free range fowls’ now…???!!
    ha ha ha


  • False prophets of doom and gloom, exhibiting neither faith nor hope, dismal in their distresses, GOD will deliver, not Mia, not the IMF neither you nor your cohorts but GOD and in him ALL must trust.


  • SS you are absolutely right they are not billionaires but give them a chance for gods sake they have only been in power two days.


  • Sometime last year I posited a scenario in which Rawdon Roddy Adams would sit in the lower house eventually and I said the St Thomas seat might be the avenue through which he makes the entry.I noticed in today’s Sunday Sun Cinty is hinting at grooming a successor.Pilgrim of the DLP might want to try his hand again at getting bashing nr 5 in his vain attempt to get in to the lower house. Why, if he couldn’t hold the 60 year old St John seat he would be wise to throw in the towel now although he is a young man in years but old in experience at being beaten at the polls all the time.


  • Would Dr. Mascoll be also interested in a safe seat


  • Whichever how you slice and dice it 30 ministers are overkill in an economy the said 30 and their despot on the campaign trail said was at death’s door. The 60% who voted in lowest turnout of the modern era and the 40% stay homies want the government to succeed. After all if they fail 100 percent of us will suck salt. Its unclear how 30 ministers including proven buffoons Indar Weir, Atherley, Payne, Sutherland et al will drag us out of the clutches of the a gloomy economy and the IMF.

    Yardfowl David BU deserves a cabinet post. He organized a brutal crusade against the DLP for a decade while sucking up to Mia’s happy and gay posse of rivals. An extra minister only adds thirty thousand monthly in poor taxpayers money to the trough at which the other 30 are feeding. The optics of 30 ministers is as bad as it gets. The toughest mission for Mottley is to remember all their names when signing their cheques.


  • @Dunks ripe aka waiting

    Not quite.

    You may recall BU was pro David Thompson and DLP, it was after he died and the government under a dithering Stuart took over the blogmaster et al started to share concerns, it turned out we were correct. It is generally accepted that deputy prime ministers are selected because they can be trusted not to move against the leader. The fact others (E11) in the Cabinet were unable to get him to step aside in the national interest will be recorded in our political history.


  • It is so amazing how the blp yardfowls are soo estatic with Mia bloated cabinet at the taxpayers expense of 8million yearly SMFH
    Question on the ministers 10% to charity wouldnt that be subjected to a tax exemption
    So far everything Mia has done are shades of Trumpism


  • Yes david you were not always as pro BLP as you are now.I can attest to the fact that you were supportive of certain stances of the dlp earlier on in their administration.

    This is why I am clinging to my hope that you will call out crap when you see it in this administration – honeymoon or no honeymoon.Use the same clean surgical skills and sharp tongue that you used on the last administration.

    We can not allow any rot to start and grow.


  • @T. Inniss

    You should read the blog below THURSDAY’S BLOG. Based on performance the DLP had to go. The BLP is the only reasonable option in the country. In is not about pro BLP.



    ““There is no time for pause…………

    and there is certainly no place for triumphalism and exhortation. We have serious work to do and serious problems to solve,” she declared yesterday.


  • pieceuhderockyeahright

    @The Honourable Blogmaster

    In a really perverse way the response from T. Inniss is extremely enlightening

    Here we have a classic situation where a newcomer recently arrived from ??? Comes on your blog that has been operating for a decade ad accuses you of bring pro BLP

    It is like having your FM station hardcoded to 98.7 and never knowing any other station.

    It underscores what de ole man is saying that BU has outgrown its blog embodiment.

    If you stay here you will do the person that you are AND THE BEING BU CAN BECOME a serious disservice where Johnny come latelys will pigeonhole you to being some neophyte depending on when they get a chance and chime in

    As part of the due diligence for the e-participatory democracy thrust I have been reviewing best in class models and this one came to the fore

    Do be assured that as soon as you start thus exercise thst the many stragglers on and those who are challenged will seek to teif de concept

    But be assured none of them have your 10 year bonafides to back them

    Liked by 1 person

  • The Nation reported another “first’ as in public swearing in, but I thought Thompson did the same in 2008. Interestingly there was a religious aspect to it as reported on BU, funny how some of the comments match the ones now being made.

    Hope springs eternal……





  • Pieceuh derock

    I read with amusement your post above.I well recall just a few years ago before it became so fashionable to piss pon the last government that you were on this very blog telling us what a scary prospect – a Mia as P.M. will be

    You reminded us of some of her past misdeeds including her threat to seek out and shut down the blogs.You told us that you were so scared to share certain things on the computer that you knew lest the unthinkable happened.Yet here you are now proclaiming how wonderful our new P.M. will be and all those great things she will do and she obviously SEEMS to be the best thing since slice bread.

    Pardon me if I am mistaken but is this a counterfeit PUDRYR?PUDRYR is that really you?


  • David/BU your comment at 7:38 a.m. is noted.


  • If the prime minister has a minister of the environment, why is she dominating the climate change meeting? This obsession with publicity is a bit concerning. And we know she is over-booking herself. At the launch of BERT, an event that she should have presented, she left it to her technocrats because she had a Cabinet meeting; at the launch of the Irishman Paul Doyle’s deal with Hilton, she said she had to attend a number of meetings. She must not only learn to delegate, but to have confidence in her ministers. Barbados is now an autocracy.


  • Why has prime minister Mia Mottley appointed a Cabinet when she continues to speak across government? This is the behaviour of a dictator, made worse by the constant illogical waffle – lots of noise about climate change, yet increasing the number of motor vehicles on the streets; nonsense about speaking Mandarin, yet doing nothing about an education policy; hysteria about alleged DLP malfeasance in office, yet five months later there is no prosecution, no charges, no arrests.
    Cabinet members must speak up; those who have independent means must give her an ultimatum, delegate responsibility or they will walk out – or better yet remove her from office.


  • pieceuhderockyeahright

    @ Hal Austin

    Hal, for cabinet Ministers to speak out two things have to happen.

    First of all they have to have balls which as you can well see they have none.

    And secondly, and more importantly, they have to have raped the country of their respective millions and they have not been there long enough for that to have happened

    And the sheeple gather around and say “baaaaa”


  • Is it a case if the traditional media giving FRONTPAGE coverage to Mia at the expense of her ministers? A scan of Facebook this morning shows several ministers in the news.


  • Prime minister Mia Amor Mottley will participate in two overseas engagements, including a high level conference on disasters and climate change, within the next few days.(Quote)

    Our publicity-conscious prime minister is at it again. Mr Jong is really working for his money. Our great prime minister is now an expert on climate change.
    One minute she is on about the economy, next she is on about education policy, next she is on about climate change, next she is on about the man of the moon. Even giving a speech to a cricket club. Does she ever decline an invitation? Who is paying for her trip to Trinidad?


Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s