← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted Pachamama
Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton

Our contentions have always been that a vagina represents the most sacred of places, as incubator for all life. We are adamant it is the only Heaven we have known and want to know. So concepts like sex working and establishing rivals to Her should not stand.

The claims to the presidency of the United States as being made by Hillary Clinton rest entirely on this anatomical feature which she claims to possess and has planned for its strategic deployment.

So foreign policy could be used to demonstrate the creative destructive power of vagina. ISIS, not as the sublime, but vagina employed for global warmongering. And Victoria Nuland, as the Hillary backed neocon, ‘poking’, even ‘pokeying’ the great Russian bear.

This monologue coming immediately after ‘the first gay president’ imbues the discourses with a kind of unnatural urgency to get a vagina in office. To correct a perceived historical wrong ….. Obama as a person out of turn.

Yuh know  there is a certain pecking order which Obama did not pay due regards to. That order says White males should be first, then the White woman, then the Black woman and after that any number is to be played. But then again, we could be wrong on both counts. Whether Obama possesses a ‘back’ vagina or whether he is non-White. These issues will require some investigation, by others.

So we have White women like Gloria Steinem and others, who present themselves as leaders of women rights, making the vagina case of Hilary. Steinem el al are women who for centuries benefited from White privilege and the exploitation of Black women. And like Clinton, they continue so to do, today!

They shamelessly continue with a vagina monologue even when we have shown them that their so-called progressive ideals are self-centered. That Black women, even before White women existed, possessed traditions far more advance than White women currently have.

These are the White ‘progressives’ who promote homosexuality. Present bulling to the world as a normalcy. All this at a time when rural women, in particular, but all women generally are suffering more and more because of the most grotesque mal-distributions of resources since the first Hadzabe woman over 200 thousands years ago.

But Clinton sees herself as the first women to be president of the USA. For her, this is the time of firsts. It might even be helpful to that cause if she were shown as a lesbian.

Recently, Yoko Ono made disclosures relating to this matter. Ms. Ono stated clearly that she and Hillary Clinton were ‘lovers’ while she was married to John Lennon and Hillary to Bill. Of course, these revelations will not be covered by mainstream media.

The vagina monologues even include issues of bathroom usage. We sometimes wonder if those who call themselves Black progressives and support the bulling agenda, they can’t see that none of these gospels changes the underlying nature of the racist society White people have constructed.

So we are now to have a Hillary monologue which says that big-hard-back-men, dressed in mini-skirts, are to use the same bathrooms as little girls. This is the result of the most perverse misguidance ever known to woman.

And it never bothers the proponents of these unnatural practices that the sacred American civil rights traditions are being sullied on the altar of a highly questionable agenda.

The vagina monologues of Hillary Rodham Clinton and her cohorts aim at setting up a modern, recognizable, dynasty of homosexuality. And the corporate elites are on board for they will always support any distractions which could prevent us from charging the Bastille.

It is time for the useful idiots, who delude themselves that they are part of some grand civilizational project, to wake up or they will be sold out, again, like what happened at the heights of the AIDS crisis. For White society there is really only one value metric – money, not tail.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

105 responses to “The Vagina Monologues of Hillary ‘Rodham’ Clinton”

  1. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Lol…Clinton is a mistake of nature, should never be elected president, neither should Trump, but the self destruction has to start somewhere.


  2. Now come on i was expecting to read something more explosive about Hilary Clinton than who she slept with You really do not expect the american people to refrain from voting for Hilary because she supposedly had a sexual encounter with Oko Ono , although she could have pick some woman with much more beautiful characteristics

  3. Simple Simon Avatar

    @Pachamama “big-hard-back-men, dressed in mini-skirts, are to use the same bathrooms as little girls.”

    But Pacha since as you say these men are homosexual what then is the problem with them using the same bathroom as little girls?

    I think that my little girl would be far safer in a bathroom with a homosexual man than in one with a heterosexual man.


  4. Jesus H Christ on a motorbike! How on earth can anyone take that load of utter garbage seriously? This is a prime example of someone who thinks that he is funny and intelligent when in fact he is neither.
    BU is sinking to a low level with this type of article.

  5. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    I agree with you book room
    This article is total bovine excrement from the first sentence
    Certainly vaginas are NOT incubators for all life.
    Plants and most lower animals do not have vaginas.
    In those animals-usually mammals- the UTERUS is the site where the young develop


  6. Dear Georgie Porgie:

    But, but, but most people do not know the difference between a vagina and a uterus.

    Most people just know that it is down dey.


  7. My brief with the Clintons is that they pretend to be friends of black people when on the basis of certain statements they are not- yet black people continue to give them a pass and support them en masse. Leading up to the 2008 presidential election when Mr Obama seemed set to be endorsed by the party; Mr Clinton’s true colours were exposed to such an extent that he was admonished by Senator Kennedy purportedly for remarking among other racial comments that once upon a time Mr Obama would be carrying coffee for them.

  8. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Balance…you are right, Clinton was being mild with his nastiness in ’08, but Hillary was throwing out broad hints that “should Obama be assassinated”…….back then, very broad hints since she was so desperate to be president and is still desperate. That’s why as as Obama’s secretary, I would have had her working 24/7..no let up for the beast we know she is, if elected, once again she will show her true form.

    Black people can be idiots and bring most of their problems on themselves.

    GP….there was a broadway show, ran for many years called the vagina monologues I guess this reference runs parallel.


  9. I am not a fan of the USA although geopolitically I will argue for the USA and Britain and Canada in preference to Russia, China and the others. Barbados and the Caribbean generally have benefitted in many ways from the policies of theses countries. I do not live in the USA and the election campaign interests me to the extent that Republican policies tend to favour Caribbean interests.


  10. Surprised that Pachamama could be so easily duped. The Yoko Ono story originitaed from the fake news website World News Daily Report.


  11. @Balance,
    Republican policies tend to favour Caribbean interests.
    Bull Turd!!! Remember a man called Reagan…U.S.President? Remember what he did to Grenada? Has there ever been compensation for the damage to infrastrure, loss of life, and all such things?Remember?
    Side remark toArtra…on another subject… The Marina Project, was always a private sector led and driven project, belonging to BS&T (remember them?) It was never and has never been a government project. Don’t try to lay blame to the government through the back door.


  12. “Alvin Cummins May 2, 2016 at 10:50 AM #

    @Balance,
    Republican policies tend to favour Caribbean interests.
    Bull Turd!!! Remember a man called Reagan…U.S.President? Remember what he did to Grenada? Has there ever been compensation for the damage to infrastrure, loss of life, and all such things? Remember?”
    If you are so narrow minded to link Caribbean interests to Reagan’s in my view rescue operation in Grenada for which the wider Grenadian population are eternally grateful then you are more simple minded than I think for while you might be politically blinded you are cno fool.

  13. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Alvin Cummins May 2, 2016 at 10:50 AM
    “The Marina Project, was always a private sector led and driven project, belonging to BS&T (remember them?) It was never and has never been a government project. Don’t try to lay blame to the government through the back door..”

    Are you for real? It’s your Constitutional right to be an obsequiously energetic yard-fowl to a political party but when it comes to telling bold lies in the face of facts that then becomes a moral transgression and a travesty of decency and commonsense.

    So if the Pierhead marina project was never a “government project” why did the lying MoF claimed it as their project designed to kick start the economy during the 2010-2013 economic doldrums?

    Why was taxpayers’ money used to pay consultants to “REDESIGN” the same “private sector led and driven project”?
    Why were payments made to a St. Lucia-based IBC by a government-run entity in respect of fees for the redesign of the same project? Why not the same BS&T (now Massy)?

    Do you remember the leaked Cabinet paper in which Stinkliar requested the termination of the same ‘redesign’ project after massive fees were milked from the scam under the ingenious hands of that ex-BTII CEO turned Quisling Boyce?


  14. The Pier Head project is a BTII project. Bonds were floated to fund the project as well.

  15. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Alvin …. qu’est-ce que je vous dis , le gouvernement rend ces offres et vous impliquer dans ces escroqueries que vous ne savez rien . il est temps de cesser de défendre l’indéfendable , vous semblez être un glouton pour la punition .

    Offrez-vous une pause , il va seulement empirer à cause de l’ imprudence et de refus d’utiliser le bon sens du gouvernement . ..je l’ai maintenant.

    How much more punishment for your blindness can you take.


  16. French is such a beautiful language! Un glouton por punition! Le bon sens du government! That sounding too sweet!


  17. pour

  18. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    Now it’s all about what will Pres Trump do. Finally the nominee – bar the shouting .

    According to many here Hilary and Bill will not win so Trump must be the next President of the USA…I wonder if Ladbrokes will have the conviction to offer 5,000 to 1 odds on this race too.

    The Leicestershire victory costs them a few bucks well so maybe not 5K to 1 but great odds should get some takers.

    This will be a wild and wacky campaign ahead particularly as Clinton is limping along towards her party’s nomination and Trump is now boldly crushing all before him after all these projections of a contested campaign.

    Buckle down…here we go…

    btw the joke is that Cruz dropped out because Trump had started the rumor that Cruz’s dad was dear friends wih Lee Oswald (the Kennedy assassin) and was with him before the grassy knoll episode. Trump doesn’t play, the next iteration of that would likely have Cruz Sr planning the damn thing.

    Hilary will get washed in licks! Oh lawd.


  19. Americans like Barbadians are between a rock and a very hard place. When they could choose Donald Trump to be in a presidential race they are scraping the very bottom of the barrel. I’m willing to bet that most of what he has promised he could never accomplish. If he doesn’t know that he will find it out if he wins. Maybe he does know it and is just being a politician. In which case all those idiots who are voting for a madman to enter the White House will sure feel foolish and will suffer more than we are here at present when he makes a mess of things. Of course we too will suffer when he starts World War III. Perhaps there is something to the end time prophecy after all.

    Don’t think he’ll win though. Most people are smart enough too chose regular old evil over madness. Hillary is probably smart enough not to cause World War III.


  20. Simple, ever stopped to think that heterosexual men could use this to gain access to the little girls in the bathroom? What’s a little mini skirt camouflage to a sick creature?

  21. Simple Simon Avatar

    @de pedantic Dribbler May 3, 2016 at 11:02 PM “Hilary will get washed in licks! Oh lawd.”

    True. Because the intelligencia insists on overestimating the intelligence of the average voter. And this is as true in America as it is in Barbados

  22. Simple Simon Avatar

    @Donna May 3, 2016 at 11:18 PM “Simple, ever stopped to think that heterosexual men could use this to gain access to the little girls in the bathroom? What’s a little mini skirt camouflage to a sick creature?”

    True.

    Those of us who have little girls always have to be on the watch out for those heteroesexual men (with or without their mini-skirts)


  23. What happen that the two o’ we keeping watch? Somebody going soon be on we case. LOL


  24. ” Hillary is probably smart enough not to cause World War III.”

    She probably will if it serves her interest


  25. Donna May 3, 2016 at 11:15 PM #

    “Americans like Barbadians are between a rock and a very hard place. When they could choose Donald Trump to be in a presidential race they are scraping the very bottom of the barrel”

    Why? are Barbadians in the same position ?


  26. Amazing that some of you don’t get it. The president of America represents interest groups and will make decisions in the geopolitical interest of America.


  27. @Dee Word

    Hopefully assassination is not in play. It is always a dangerous ploy to try to buck the establishment.

  28. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    http://ow.ly/4nrheq

    These 2 beasts, could be the worse thing to happen to the US, looked at another way, maybe that is what the people who make it possible, will deserve.


  29. Gee,. Getting ready to hit the sack and WW&C gone and post about Rudy Giuliani. That is a guy who thinks he can explain away anything that he does wrong.

  30. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @David, yes indeed let’s keep that word linked only to Pres Kennedy. Unfortunately what Trump has stirred has placed the Obama family at continued great risk when one would have expected a decrease in such concerns.

    On a completely lighter note one network political anchor was caught with his tongue lolling out over Melania Trump’s sashaying, beguiling walk. LOLL. A beautiful woman is a beautiful woman. Why do we have to get into trouble for appreciating that. Oh lawd.

    But on the more serious side that same anchor also said he believed that it would be “hard” for a woman to act as president. I personally have absolutely no idea why he would think that…well actually I do but the mantra that ‘old-white-men-must run-things’ is so passe that it’s not worth pixel space.

    Women can run anything well (Mr Bush Tea breath deeply now). The average female President would think maybe twice longer than her male counterpart on the nuclear button decision, for example, but would execute just as ‘manly’ if it came to that…and no one would be checking her backside then that’s fah sure !!!

    @Donna, re your comments, if one breaks it down to the base then there is a clarity that Donald Trump is just more of the same politically. Certainly, it’s more of the same with grand promises that can’t be fulfilled. More of the same trite responses to complex issues; same dissembling and misdirection on all issues.

    What sets Trump apart is that he speaks in the most aggressive language ever for a ‘main stream’ candidate in a first world country….repeat ‘main stream’…’first world’.

    His rhetoric and style has been seen repeatedly in South American and Caribbean politics. In looks and behaviour he is very much like our ‘beloved’ Tom, I would offer: tall, brash, in-your-face and absolutely adores lovely women.

    Tom dissed immigrants he didn’t like just like this Don. Cussed leaders who displeased him too..and on and on. Think of any South American strongman – like a Chavez – and its the same.

    I do not like Mr Trump as I think he is the worst type of political chameleon liar but if one dismissed personal bias and scored the man objectively against his peers then he is certainly not much worst than Mrs. Clinton. He is no worst a liar and schemer than Cruz. More flamboyant than the solid Kasich will ever be. More confident and sharper on his feet than Rubio. Certainly more adept than Christie, definitely less outwardly misogynistic than Tom and surely trends towards the vindictive and aggressive against opponents as Chavez.

    And based on paper qualifications as intelligent as any of them.

    So all to say, whether Bridgetown or Washington or Caracas this is actually some serious TOP of the barrel stuff here…afterall these guys are at the pinnacle of the food chain from which we all fight for scraps…political or otherwise.

    A different twist!

  31. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    Good video post Mr Blogmaster. Trump is no new phenomena as Clinton says and also is well chronicled in the press. Of course in addition to what she said she could also have mentioned the Tea Party movement. She could have mentioned the wide-spread attempts across the US southern states to turn back decades of entrenched laws on voters’ enfranchisement. She could have noted the rise in racism when some so glibly (and stupidly) said the Obama Presidency was a watershed in the racial disquiet in the US.

    So Trump alone will and has not set back the Republicans. This is really the proverbial chicken’s coming home to roost scenario. All that has happened here is that we now see openly where the old fowls live after they were ranging all over the place.

    They will hatch more chickens, regroup and move forward I suspect more efficiently.

    In sum yes its a challenge but this Trump issue if not for example a fracture of the Johnson era that precipitated the lost of the South for ‘generations’. This is not that type of profound change.

    This demagoguery if used expertly and sensibly can actually be a boon to the Republicans. But they first need to recognize where they have gone wrong. That will be the issue because the McConnel’s of their world have absolutely no damn idea that the problem starts with them. They actually really believe it is Trump.

    Thus on the other hand if the Democrats don’t do their normal insane overreach (and both Clinton and Sanders are opposite extremes of that) they can actually win back the Senate and possibly even the House .

    And there is that gargantuan prize of the Supreme Court seat…so Republicans will come together strongly…or as the don would say, they will aim to make that Supreme Court great (conservative) again!


  32. Old Baje “Surprised that Pachamama could be so easily duped.” Really?!! The person is a pseudo-intellectual idiot.


  33. It is a BASIC rule of nature.
    Everyone (family, country) always get the leaders it deserves….
    When therefore we see the kind of Hobson’s choices that are being presented to countries such as the USA (and to Barbados) it SHOULD tell us something is urgently WRONG…..

    But there are none so blind as those who WILL NOT see…. so we wring our hands, hope for the best, and keep on doing what we always did….

    MADNESS!!
    …and outcomes for the insane are seldom pleasant……


  34. The Republicans started with 17 candidates and ended up with Ethelred the Unready, now they are scrambling and trying to promote Party unity but how unified can a Party become when the second last candidate standing called the presumptive nominee a “pathological liar” and a “serial philanderer” . Cruz went on to say that Trump also said his Vietnam in the 70’s was avoiding venereal disease- yuh can’t make this stuff up- Bush Pater called St. Ronnie’s of California economic proposals “voodoo economics” but that was mild compared to the insults being hurled around.

    Trump was right about one thing, after one of his primary wins he said he had the support of the “uneducated”, for once a politician stumbled upon the truth.

  35. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    http://ow.ly/4ns7VX

    And if ya think that is bad, it actually gets worse.


  36. “Sargeant May 5, 2016 at 8:01 AM #

    The Republicans started with 17 candidates and ended up with Ethelred the Unready, now they are scrambling and trying to promote Party unity but how unified can a Party become when the second last candidate standing called the presumptive nominee a “pathological liar” and a “serial philanderer” . Cruz went on to say that Trump also said his Vietnam in the 70’s was avoiding venereal disease- yuh can’t make this stuff up- Bush Pater called St. Ronnie’s of California economic proposals “voodoo economics” but that was mild compared to the insults being hurled around.

    Trump was right about one thing, after one of his primary wins he said he had the support of the “uneducated”, for once a politician stumbled upon the truth.”

    Sarge I thought trading insults by political opponents was par for the course but your comments above seem to suggest otherwise. Allow me to draw your attention to some of the remarks made by the Clintons of Mr Obama in their turbulent campaign of 2008.

    According to Leonard Greene of the the New York post-Bill Clinton made insensitive ‘race jab’ about Obama in 2008. “A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.”

    Clinton allegedly made the racially insensitive remark to Sen. Ted Kennedy as he tried to convince the liberal lion to endorse his wife, Hillary, Obama’s rival for the Democratic nomination, according to The New Yorker.

    Kennedy endorsed Obama.

    The author of the article, Ryan Lizza, said he he heard about the comment from legendary NBC newsman Tim Russert, who died in 2008.

    The reported comment was similar to one attributed to Clinton in a 2010 book.

    “A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee,” Clinton is quoted as saying in “Game Change,” by John Heilemann and Mark Halperin.

    Clinton’s speech to the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, NC, isn’t until Wednesday night — but the former president is getting attention for remarks he has already made.

    He has, for example, called Obama “incompetent” and “an amateur” who has no clue about how the world operates, according to an article in Sunday’s Post by Edward Klein, author of “The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House.”

    “Obama doesn’t know how to be president,” Clinton told friends and political advisers last year, the article added. “He doesn’t know how the world works.”
    DNC.

    During that campaign when in an attempt to promote herself as a more courageous candidate than Mr Obama she said that on a visit to Serbia she landed under sniper fire which was later proved to be a blatant untruth. She wanted to portray Mr Obama as a wimp saying that if the phone rang in the middle of the night and an important decision was required he wouldn’t know what to do. She went on to serve as his Secretary of State feigning illness and stepping down when the Benghazi issue got too hot to handle.

    My question is What makes Mrs Clinton a better candidate than Mr Trump. Mr Trump’s track record is there for all to see. What is hers?

  37. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Clinton the lowlife would always say that, Obama is too classy to get caught with his d*ck down a young intern’s throat….that is what people are afraid of with both Hilary and Bill Clinton…they have no class.

  38. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @Balance, The answer is quite simple…Trump is a bigger bigot and political prostitute than Clinton is. One cannot vote for him on that simple fact unless you share his rabid sensationalism. Often a vote is made on the basis of the lesser of two evils..or no vote.

    Bengazai was a comprehensive screw-up. But the matter has been ventilated extensively and with all that has been said the summary bottom line is that no Marine or seal or any other military officer would have knowingly allowed his fellow combatant to be attacked without support. This was not Clinton’s mistake directly. It was a US agencies foul-up.

    The email server issue was ridiculously stupid. But it was essentially what was allowed.

    And yes Bill Clinton made those disgusting remarks. But Obama stuffed the ball with a wild Dr J style slam dunk. His ‘in yah face, tek dat’ was the finest revenge possible.

    Mr. Trump on the other hand has been the bull in the China shop – all puns intended. He speaks aggressively about bringing jobs back to US even as he admits that he entered into contract with a company who manufactured outside the US to make his Trump brand clothing. A bold faced BSer.

    His litany of promises and uneducated policy prescriptions are well known. But what should disqualify him is his wild talk that incites hate and distrust between the different racial groups in the US… He boyishly makes fun of persons with disabilities; and will cuss you down to your personal bathroom needs a la Megan Kelly if you cross him.

    How does one rationally vote for such behavior for a President…unless it’s a banana republic!


  39. ”But what should disqualify him is his wild talk that incites hate and distrust between the different racial groups in the US”

    Surprised? http://www.vice.com/read/all-the-evidence-we-could-find-about-fred-trumps-alleged-involvement-with-the-kkk


  40. de pedantic Dribbler May 5, 2016 at 7:07 PM #

    The bigger worry is not that Trump acts the way he does, the worry is that he may be a frontman and a part of a longer term plan, finally come to fruition.

    That scenario is far more sinister and frightening.

    Let us hope not.


  41. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Trump

    quote”
    Civil rights lawsuit

    In 1973, the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division filed a civil rights suit against the Trump organization charging that it refused to rent to black people. The Urban League had sent black and white testers to apply for apartments in Trump-owned complexes; the whites got the apartments, the blacks didn’t. According to court records, four superintendents or rental agents reported that applications sent to the central office for acceptance or rejection were coded by race. A 1979 Village Voice article quoted a rental agent who said Trump instructed him not to rent to black people and to encourage existing black tenants to leave. In 1975, a consent decree described by the head of DOJ’s housing division as “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated,” required Trump to advertise vacancies in minority papers and list vacancies with the Urban League. The Justice Department subsequently complained that continuing “racially discriminatory conduct by Trump agents has occurred with such frequency that it has created a substantial impediment to the full enjoyment of equal opportunity.”[12]”

    Unquote


  42. “How does one rationally vote for such behavior for a President…unless it’s a banana republic!”

    Are all those millions of people who voted For Mr Trump irrational any rational? How would you categorise those who gave the DLP a second term rational or irrational?


  43. “Crusoe May 5, 2016 at 7:55 PM #

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Trump

    quote”
    Civil rights lawsuit”

    Catching at straws crusoe. Does the fact that Mrs Clinton once worked for the avowed republican racist Senator Barry Goldwater make her a racist?


  44. @Balance
    I commend you on your unfailing support for the Grand Old Party, even if today’s GOP bears scant resemblance to the Party of your Great Grandfather once removed.

    A few of us here are just endorsing the stance taken by Paul Ryan (Republican Speaker of the House) and Bush Pater and Fils ( both ex Pres) in our dismay at the prospect of the Unready as a Presidential candidate. If those card bearing; flag wearing; heart in the right place; elected Repubs, feel that way about the Donald what are we mere observers of history to do?


  45. @Sargeant

    If the establishment is coming out against Trump, what comes next?

  46. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    What comes next is settling down. They would create a debilitating precedent if they usurp his nomination so that is out. There will be a major generational shift at the Supreme Court if a Democratic wins and that would be catastrophic for them..so they will settle down….

    They are liable to lose the majority in the Senate if there is too much inter-party fighting..so they will settle….but they have to get him to modulate some of his nonsensical rhetoric.

    And let’s be clear, the scary part of all of this is that there is a possible path to victory for Trump as US Presidential elections are all about four or five ‘swing’ states.

    Having shaken up the supremacists dreads that were at the bottom of the barrel and the disposed Whites who felt so disenfranchised, if he can pour them into voting booths and reclaim others (females etc) with a modified rhetoric who knows what could happen.

    Either way Donald Trump will cause a major cataclysmic event in the US: if he loses he will bring the Senate and House crashing with him. If he wins he will move the US to a period of grave tension and unrest .

    Californians are being warned of the big one, the San Andreas fault…well of course the tremors from the Trump fault will crash the entire nation…

  47. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @Balance, rational by its definition means using reason and analysis to reach a conclusion so I will rephrase my remarks: “How does anyone who abhors racial and xenophobic provocation, rationally vote for such behavior for a President…unless it’s a banana republic!”

    …. Or folks like you who can ‘balance’ such behaviours and easily rationalize voting support for Trump!… Extend that simple logic to Bim and there is little confusion why the electorate voted as they did.

    Trump currently follows (indirectly) on social media several individuals who are associated with white supremacy groups. He has retweeted their remarks which incite racial hate. He has been associated with but disavows knowing persons like former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke (a man he first encountered and talked about back in the 80s).

    This is the man you and these millions of rational voters ‘support’. That’s their and your free choice.

    Incidentally, working for a racist doesn’t make you one… but supporting a racist after you become aware of their politics and policy prescriptions does however…. I would again question your ‘balance’ and strange rationalizations…but we already explained how that works.

    Btw your citation would put Clinton in her teens or just a bit older while working for Goldwater back in the 60’s. That time-line also suggests she was likely a student worker and thus evolving as a person. And considering that this white girl from middle-class suburbia grew up in a likely ‘racist’, conservative family the association makes absolute sense.

    It’s not just where we stopped along our journey but rather what we learned there and… how has it made our lives more wholesome…maybe Hilary Clinton does not have a wholesome life (in the eyes of many) but we can safely say her sins do not include racists tweeting and provocation.

    She has evolved completely. He certainly hasn’t from his family’s racist legacy, has he?

    You are either being deliberately provocative or provocatively dissembling. No wonder you have no problem supporting Trump! Oh lawd, LOLL.

  48. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    TRUMP IS A GIANT
    HE HAS HIS OWN JET—–HE DOES NOT NEED AIR FORCE 1!
    ALL HIS HOUSES ARE HIS! AND THEY ARE BIGGER AND BETTER THAN THE WHITE HOUSE!
    HE BUST ALL THEIR TAILS GOOD AND PROPER…WHETHER WUNNA LIKE IT OR NOT.
    THE GOP WILL DO WHAT HE SAYS OR HE WILL SCREW DEM HARD
    IT WILL BE HIS WAY OR THE HIGHWAY.
    BARE SPORT.

    HATE HIM RIGHT OR HATE HIM LEFT
    HE IS HERE UNLESS WUNNA KILL HE OR GOD TEK HE OUT. ah lie?
    wuh you say MR BATZAPAENIC?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading