โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Compiled by Due Diligence

Panama_LeakIn his April 28 column in The Nation, BEHIND THE HEADLINES: Time for Panama Papers fightback Tony Best wrote: –

Undoubtedly, Barbados will come under increasing pressure to reduce the presence of international investors in its offshore sector. And the heat will come from the US, Canada, Britain, France, and other OECD members.

There is no question that the small countries will be subject to new attacks, new blacklists and new sanctions because of all this. Thatโ€™s what the high-tax nations and the international bureaucracies do. It is just like asking โ€˜why does a snake bite?

An April 29, article in the Toronto Star Canadians put $40 billion in tax havens last year quoting Dennis Howlett, executive director of Canadians for Tax Fairness, reinforced Bestโ€™s perspective.

Canadaโ€™s top two destinations for foreign direct investment are the United States and the United Kingdom. But rounding out the top five are three tax havens: Barbados, Luxembourg and the Cayman Islands.โ€

There might be a few resorts and golf courses (in those countries) but most of this money is not actually invested there,โ€ said Howlett. โ€œIt goes through the tax haven and gets reinvested elsewhere. The returns on those investments are reported in places like Barbados, where there are hardly any taxes.

As a friend of Barbados and a taxpayer who has to write a cheque to Canada Revenue Agency in next couple of days for his 2015 Income Taxes, I am conflicted.

I recognize that the low income taxes paid by the Canadian offshore corporations and individuals domiciled or resident in Barbados comprise a significant share of the revenue that GOB requires to pay for its social services (and $7 million Independence celebrations).ย  And, of course, they also employ a couple of thousand well paid Barbadian lawyers and accountants.

I also recognize that if those Canadian corporations and Canadians resident in Barbados were paying income taxes in Canada, the cheque I have to writeย  would be smaller.

As Tony Best says โ€œUndoubtedly, Barbados will come under increasing pressure to reduce the presence of international investors in its offshore sector.โ€

And that will undoubtedly lead to an exodus of international โ€œinvestorsโ€ from Barbadosโ€™ offshore sector, and worsen GOBโ€™s โ€œcash flowโ€ problem.

Finally, GOB should factor into its cashflow forecasting that with CIBC FCIB now about to sell insurance underwritten by the Trini insurer Massy United Insurance Limited, the revenue, profits and income taxes paid by the domestic insurers will negatively impact GOBโ€™s cash flow.

Offshore jurisdictions were being placed under increasing scrutiny by the OECDs, the Panama leak will not serve to alleviate the scrutiny. Barbados has surrendered to a policy of transitioning to a service economy i.e. tourism and international business.

DD wants to see this matter discuss on BU.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

91 responses to “The Business Blog – Panama Papers and the Threat to the Offshore Sector”

  1. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Ahhh…where should we begin. DUE…Bajans can also tell you how heavily taxed they are, so are you 100% sure that the money GOB gets from these offshore and double taxation/low tax/no tax relationships even benefit the people on the island.

    Case in point, Panama Leaks, how does DGM benefit the island when they started there offshore in Barbados, but later moved on to Panama, exactly who benefits from that arrangement, cant wait for all the information to come out from the multiple ongoing international investigations…later this year


  2. Characters like Tony Best are always doing a lot of talking but seldom connect to the fundamental points. Their analyses, as they are, always go to predictable conclusions. No wonder we always seem to be going around in circles as a country. The same warm over talk from the same kinds of people.

    The real truths include (1) that there are no bigger offshore centres in the world than in the United States and the other countries which seek to pressurize Barbados and other small island states. So the real issue is one about economic colonialism and not financial regulation per se.

    (2) There are no regulations in any ‘tax haven’ we have seen which cannot be bettered by Nevada or Delaware.

    (3) What Barbados is really doing is begging massa for a little piece of the action and when she gets a little bit too much massa then pretends that she is doing something untowards.

    (4) Connect the dots. Why do you think the largest corporations and their directors domiciled within the US can consistently pay no or very little taxes?

    We can go on and on but you can think for yourselves!

  3. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Pacha…well known for decades, but the question is, are the people in Barbados, who are very heavily taxed, with or without the offshore arrangements, actually benefit financially, from the arrangement.


  4. ” Stop laundering of plundered Nigerian assets via UK, reformers tell Cameron ”

    https://www.rt.com/uk/341254-dirty-money-london-nigeria/


  5. Well Well
    We cant ever tell. But the OECD countries play this stupid game all the time. We just had the Panama Papers – a big release just to implicate Putin. Not a single American corporation was mentioned. Is that not a CIA operation?

    It’s time to tell the people some hard truths. Not the programmed lies.

    It’s hard as hell to even open a bank account in Barbados but from my computer I have opened a bank in a certain domicile handling transactions in dozens of currencies.

  6. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Lol…Pacha, those who benefited from the institution of slavery now pretend to be moralistic pure and respected, while benefitting from money laundering and tax evasion, same old criminals, just a different era.

  7. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Some of the African leaders are still greedy beasts, same criminals, different era.

    Bukola Saraki owns a 5.7 Million Euros property in Belgravia in his own name. #PanamaPapers | Sigh!


  8. @Due Diligence, well pointed. This is a subject that is critical to Barbados and its future economy.

    The pressure against international tax planning by various groups, in Canada as documented in the article that you referenced as well as a number of other articles, is increasing.

    Even the Canadian Finance Minister has stated that they are reviewing the situation with the Isle of Man, while others have called for scrutiny of the Cayman Islands and Barbados also.

    Pressure against international tax planning is also increasing in Europe. Unfortunately, Pacha is quite right that the arguments depict a situation where a level playing field is not the goal.

    In Europe, where are the criticisms against Monaco? In the US, where are the criticisms against Vermont, Delaware?

    Add to this, the situation that every US citizen, wherever located, must file a US tax return and that banks, wherever located, must report account holdings and activity for those clients who are US citizens (FATCA), makes a very difficult path to tread.

    We are now in a situation where every finance department seeks their share of a dollar, at least, once it is located or earned outside of their own jurisdiction.

    I highly doubt that this same scrutiny is awarded to the casinos in Las Vegas. Businesses where cash is a huge method of dealing (in gambling I mean).

    However, if one accepts that the large countries call the piper, then we have to deal with the issue as is.

    As such, we have an issue that is more than serious, as it will impact our employment and foreign exchange earnings tremendously.

    I am not optimistic about this, we are on a long rough road in this. I do see a time when international business here is significantly reduced.

    That is my interpretation.

    Onto the philosophical arguments.

    I see it as a major mistake on the parts of the North American and European countries.

    This, because what they are doing is pulling the rug from under many small, but necessary countries, largely allies and also pulling the rug from under arrangements that ensure the viability of international business transactions that do actually work in the interest of the economies of the NA and European countries.

    The purpose of the Canada / Barbados tax treaty is/ was to ensure that Canadian companies could build up capital and compete in the international markets, based on this assistance.

    Is this really a time to remove such benefit, because of some folks screaming loudly about the ‘big bad wolf’ who does not pay his taxes?

    Actions based on mass hysteria cannot be sound. Unfortunately, recent cases like Apple etc, have shed unfortunate light on actions of large corporates.

    However, can one crucify all on such basis or indeed, are they wrong at all to maximize their tax situation based on existing laws?

    This is actually disturbing, that one seeks to amend laws, not based on specific legal or taxation principles, but merely to target specific types of operations or individuals.

    I have a problem with that.

    Of course, we can amend legislation to deal with what we see as unfairness etc, however, what I have a problem with is where such amendment is ‘target-based’ and not principle based.

    Then, consider that such changes to tax legislation and international treatment is now being implemented at a time of serious political instability.

    Is this choice of timing the wisest, or is it actually foolhardy?

    I would suggest a bit more thought be placed on such action, at a time when the Middle East is a mess, at a time when all of the major nations are seeing some issues with their economies.

    Yes, the instinct is to grab those taxes that you think are not being allocated appropriately.

    My suggestion is that such a reaction may be the incorrect approach and instead of improving one’s own economy, would merely hamstring corporations and individuals and instead of one’s intent, actually cause more harm than good.

    How much regulation do you actually want?

    In summary, I think that more thought needs to be placed on this issue by the larger nations, rather than running into the woods with a machete, cutting all of the trees, with no thought as to the impact on the woods as a whole.


  9. DD wrote, ” Barbados has surrendered to a policy of transitioning to a service economy i.e. tourism and international business.”

    Barbados mus reduce the dependence on this “business model” and diversify.

    Start with Agriculture and Solar powered electricity.


  10. DD wrote “CIBC FCIB now about to sell insurance underwritten by the Trini insurer Massy United Insurance Limited,”

    Maybe CIBCFCIB will become MCB ( Massey Caribbean Bank.)


  11. Two points to make:

    Price at the petrol gone up again? Seriously? The public deserves to know how the calculation is done.

    ICBL will not be covering over 800 NUPW (public workers) and if you add the cancelation of BARP policies, there you have it.

  12. Vincent Haynes Avatar
    Vincent Haynes

    Not sure if any of this matters…..read the attached,we appear to be in freefall.

    wild-coot-development-bank-missed

    https://shar.es/1eGz1H


  13. @David, Re the NUPW and BARP.

    I saw that, it is likely that they will find another carrier, however, with somewhat higher premiums.

    Which then brings us to the national medical industry and the seeming privatization of that, which was not on the cards when these public workers were putting their efforts into building Barbados, such that free medical care for many types of illness is not there anymore.

    Has it become a situation where these people will feel abandoned?

    Likewise for BARP. And with BARP, as with retired public servants, the issue is more difficult due to the aged demographic of the portfolio, which will further impact premiums for BARP, although for NUPW, the premiums should be cushioned somewhat by the working population, a younger demographic.

    Is one possibility a scenario where the Government states and enforces action such that it places all worker medical plans, private and public, under the umbrella of one insurance company, to ensure that all get coverage?

    This would mean that a company must bid for the national business (periodically, say every five years) and it would mean that all others would be left out then, at least from life and health insurance.

    But maybe that is rational, as the population is around only three hundred thousand? Can we really support three or four life and health insurers?


  14. @Crusoe

    With Barbados continuing to defend the title as the NCDs of the world why are we surprised at the consequences?


  15. David May 2, 2016 at 7:03 AM #

    True there. Chickens coming home to roost I guess.

  16. Due Diligence Avatar

    @Crusoe May 1, 2016 at 8:31 PM

    Thanks Cruse

    Excellent discussion.

    Let’s hear from others

  17. Due Diligence Avatar

    @Hants May 1, 2016 at 9:19 PM #

    “Maybe CIBCFCIB will become MCB ( Massey Caribbean Bank.)”

    Very good point

    Back in 2002 CIBC partnered/combined with Barclays to form FCIB.

    Then in 2006 Barclays baled out and exited the Barbados/Caribbean market.

    Now FCIB is partnering with Massy.

    CIBC’s bale-out may be just a few years from now

  18. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-article-1.2621279

    Yes indeed, one must watch out for these take overs or attempts at take over.


  19. The observation about Massy is interesting. It is obvious if we look at its pan Caribbean reach, interest in insurance etc it is bulking up to play a serous role. The alliance with Cibc Fcib bears a look.


  20. David May 2, 2016 at 12:25 PM #

    Indeed, the old ‘import and retail’ that so many of these ‘corporations’ have been built on, can only go so far. Insurance etc are viable services that can be lucrative.


  21. @Crusoe

    Given the demise of CLICO that some attribute to poor governance by regional regulators one wonders what improvements were made as we observe Massy bulking up.


  22. A country managing a difficult economy, for 7 years and counting, needs to take the business of reporting on the economy ver seriously. The ambivalence expressed by Mr.Harrison does not cut it.

    http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/80772/prompt-bank-reports


  23. Perhaps the cabinet can learn from Zimbabwe where President Mugabe is about to sign a bill that will make the likes of Clico,Parris,Thornhill.Woody Davis,Leslie Haynes,Basil Springer and the senior managers jointly and severally liable for any losses of depositors and further without prejudice to any other criminal charges,these officers are liable to a term of imprisonment for a MINIMUM of 10 years

    http://www.herald.co.zw/president-to-sign-banking-amendment-bill/

  24. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Lol…oh what a night that would be for Leslie Haynes et al.

    I agree the directors should also be held liable, for that level of thievery in insurance companies.

  25. fortyacresandamule Avatar
    fortyacresandamule

    We cannot build a sound economy on financial gimmickry . Worse, when it comes at the expense of the Big Boys. Like it or not , It’s their WORLD and they set the rules…even when there is blatant double standard. The USA marijuana industry comes to mind. The tax haven model is not fair and sustainable. No wonder we life in a society, so unequal today, more than anytime in human civilisation. The devastation on Africa’s societies- by these multinationals and their offshores subsidiaries domiciled in tax havens-speaks volume.

    Since the servicization of the economy, we have become a rentier state, through financial gimmickry and various ponzi schemes.

  26. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Due Diligence May 2, 2016 at 10:42 AM
    โ€œMaybe CIBCFCIB will become MCB ( Massey Caribbean Bank.)โ€

    Very good point

    Back in 2002 CIBC partnered/combined with Barclays to form FCIB.

    Then in 2006 Barclays baled out and exited the Barbados/Caribbean market.

    Now FCIB is partnering with Massy.

    CIBCโ€™s bale-out may be just a few years from now…”

    But DD, that is exactly what the miller some time back told you could happen.
    The insurance business is just the first move towards full integration and then a Barclays-like dumping.

    Shell and then ESSO did it with SOL, so why can’t Barclays and CIBC.
    The oil industry and banking are undergoing major structural changes. The East Caribbean is not part of the future for transnational corporations in these sunset industries.

  27. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Appears no one can tell what benefits, if any, the low tax/no tax/double taxation treaty have for the citizens on the island, what are the financial benefits, we know the offshore clients save millions by not paying taxes in their countries, in their currencies, does that translate to millions going into Barbados.

  28. fortyacresandamule Avatar
    fortyacresandamule

    Offshore tax havens are zero sum game endeavors and race to the bottom outcome . Nobody likes paying taxes, but those who should pay their fair share should pay their fair share . Caribbean states shouldn’t enable or model their economy on this type of rent seeking behavior.


  29. @fortyacresandamule

    Then we add the latest fad, citizens by investment (CIB).

  30. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    I am not so conflicted.
    You know if there is a fence where Canada will sit? Squarely on top of it.
    Perspective?
    Canada has 90+ tax treaties.
    https://www.fin.gc.ca/treaties-conventions/in_force–eng.asp

    Hence I view the one with Barbados as an “informal form of aid”.

    Canada has a mind blowingly complex tax system, filled with a gazillion tax loopholes. My point is your inference that if Canada were collecting more tax (from closing the Barbados loophole as an example, assuming those companies/persons wouldn’t transfer to another similar jurisdiction) it would be reflected in lower taxes in Canada. I think not.

    Politically, no question destinations for IBC’s like Bim, will be placed under the microscope. Yet, this is more like getting caught in the cross fire of a bigger war; our target is misguided because we are easy prey. It deflects from the bigger, and more politically sensitive fish.

    Remember, any jurisdiction can levy a tax, collecting it is far more difficult.


  31. @ David,

    Seems the best brainiacs in Barbados retire and then show how bright they are.

    Wild Coot is a great source of information.

    http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/80755/wild-coot-development-bank-missed


  32. “The following letter was sent today to UK Prime Minister David Cameron by Nigerian civil society organisations, including Transparency International’s partner Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC):”

    http://www.transparency.org/news/pressrelease/nigeria_civil_society_letter_ahead_of_international_anti_corruption_summit


  33. @Hants

    When Adrian asked the question to Butch Stewart at the BCCI luncheon he was laughed out of the room by Barbados’ best captains of industry. We are seeing it come to pass our officials boasting of record tourists arrivals yet there is not the incremental increase in forex reserves.


  34. @David May 2, 2016 at 6:05 PM

    Could it be because the US$ paid by Butch’s guests go to Butch’s bank accounts in Miami, New York, Toronto and London (and Panama), and Butch sends enough Bajan Bucks to cover wages, a few local supplies and utilities.


  35. @NorthernObserver May 2, 2016 at 5:23 PM #

    An โ€œinformal form of aidโ€ indeed.

    DD just hit the send button in TurboTax, so will be sending my share of the aid to Canada Revenue Agency as soon as they send me the bill

  36. fortyacresandamule Avatar
    fortyacresandamule

    @David. The most of the tourism dollars stay offshore. What is remitted to Barbados is just enough to pay local bills. And those earnings that are captured in BIM have a high leakage rate. Tourism arrival and foreign exchange earnings are journal entry exercise. Those statistics have marginal impact on the NIR( net international reserve).

  37. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    So..the citizens actually benefitting significantly from tourism is questionable and has been for many years, since it’s only foolish people would think the money is actually spent or enters the island, except for overheads…

    The citizens benefitting significantly from the offshore arrangements are also highly questionable, except for a few jobs on island, the offshore dudes quickly move to other jurisdiction, while still having offices on island…

    The citizens in Barbados are very heavily taxed, it does not add up.


  38. @fortyacresandamule

    Found this interesting report that researches ‘leakage’ in the tourism sector by developing countries p.22.

    tourism_leakage

    https://www.giz.de/expertise/downloads/giz2013-en-tourism-exploring-the-leakage-effect.pdf


  39. @David May 2, 2016 at 8:07 PM

    The thesis is interesting, but way over DD’s pay grade. DD suggest it should be required reading by the MOT, MOF and the GUV.

    We know that much of Sandals revenue does not reach the tourist receiving countries (Barbados et al). Wonder how many others – Elegant bookings are throughout Ft. Lauderdale. Hilton, Radison, Marriott? Wyndham?

  40. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @DD
    as you know CIDA got rolled into some other body.
    Here is one small report, which will tell you why it is no longer.
    Pick your libation of choice. I bet you cannot get past p20, which of course was exactly the intent of the authors LOL
    http://www.international.gc.ca/department-ministere/assets/pdfs/evaluation/2011/dev-riap-pri11-eng.pdf

  41. Colonel Buggy Avatar
    Colonel Buggy

    We have got to keep a close eye on these cabinet ministers jetting off to Cuba to do business. They may stopover in Panama to collect their ‘savings’ and put it in a more secure place, as Leroy Parris did , in the Barbados Central Bank.


  42. Due Diligence May 2, 2016 at 6:35 PM # @David May 2, 2016 at 6:05 PM
    Could it be because the US$ paid by xxxx’s guests go to xxxx’โ€™s bank accounts in Miami, New York, Toronto and London (and Panama) and Cayman Islands, and xxxx sends enough Bajan Bucks to cover wages, a few local supplies and utilities.

    And likely many other operations are ditto… certainly hotels. Take the bookings online, into Cayman account.

    Including distribution / retail.

    Supposing I buy Bushweedwhackers or CheapAC’s, I set up a Cayman company, buy them for USD35 each from China, take a (non-taxed) profit of USD200 in Cayman, Caaman invoice Barbados USD235, Barbados imports and sells for equivalent of USD350.

    So, some profit in BIM but most in Cayman.

    Just speculating of course.


  43. @Crusoe

    It is fairly well known several Bajan companies have set up companies domiciled in St.Lucia to manage payments to local companies in Barbados and to pay salaries. Many of them receive US dollar payments.

  44. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    to “manage payments”….u planning on running in the next election?

    I would alter the flow suggested….all he forgot were the inter company management fees to drag the profits to zero or less. You have no tax to pay if you have no profits?


  45. @DD

    We have to look at oil price inching upwards and likely impact on high oil import countries like Barbados. This concern against anemic growth in Barbados’ oil reserves.


  46. Former Tax Lobbyists Are Writing the Rules on Tax Dodging

    Lee Fang

    Apr. 27 2016, 2:14 p.m.

    The secret tax-dodging strategies of the global elite in China, Russia, Brazil, the U.K., and beyond were exposed in spectacular fashion by the recent Panama Papers investigation, fueling a worldwide demand for a crackdown on tax avoidance.

    But there is little appetite in Congress for taking on powerful tax dodgers in the U.S., where the practice has become commonplace.

    A request for comment about the Panama Papers to the two congressional committees charged with tax policy โ€” House Ways and Means and the Senate Finance Committee โ€” was ignored.

    The reluctance by congressional leaders to tackle tax dodging is nothing new, especially given that some of the largest companies paying little to no federal taxes are among the biggest campaign contributors in the country. But thereโ€™s another reason to remain skeptical that Congress will move aggressively on tax avoidance: Former tax lobbyists now run the tax-writing committees.

    We researched the backgrounds of the people who manage the day-to-day operations of both committees and found that a number of lobbyists who represented world-class tax avoiders now occupy top positions as committee staff. Many have stints in and out of government and the lobbying profession, a phenomenon known as the โ€œreverse revolving door.โ€ In other words, the lobbyists that help special interest groups and wealthy individuals minimize their tax bills are not only everywhere on K Street, theyโ€™re literally managing the bodies that create tax law:

    • Barbara Angus, the chief tax counsel of the House Ways and Means Committee, became a staff member in January of this year after leaving her position as a lobbyist with Ernst & Young. Angus, registration documents show, previously helped lobby lawmakers on tax policy on behalf of clients such as General Electric, HSBC, and Microsoft, among other clients.
    • Mark Warren, a tax counsel for the tax policy subcommittee of Ways and Means, is a former lobbyist for the Retail Industry Leaders Association, a trade group that includes Coca-Cola, Home Depot, Walgreens, and Unilever. Warren previously lobbied on a range of tax policies, including tax credits and โ€œtax relief.โ€
    • Mike Evans became chief counsel for the Senate Finance Committee in 2014 after leaving his job as a lobbyist for K&L Gates, where he lobbied on tax policy for JP Morgan, Peabody Energy, Brown-Forman, BNSF Railway, and other corporate clients.
    • Eric Oman, the senior policy adviser for tax and accounting at the Senate Finance Committee, previously worked for Ernst & Youngโ€™s lobbying office, representing clients on tax policy.

    A request for comment about the role of former lobbyists now working as staffers was also ignored by the committees.

    Wealthy individuals and corporations routinely squirrel away vast sums of money in jurisdictions like Delaware or Wyoming to avoid taxation, a major factor in the current state of affairs that allows those at the top of the economic pyramid to pay an effective tax rate that is often lower than the middle class. Verizon, Boeing, and General Electric, to name a few, paid no federal income taxes in recent years, despite earning a hefty profit margin. The Tax Justice Network ranks the U.S. as the third most problematic tax haven country, a ranking even worse than Panama.

    โ€œTax Serviceโ€ by Thomas Hawk used under CC BY NC-2.0

  47. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    The Panama Leaks was the catalyst needed to expose the whole show of hypocrisy that world leaders have instigated against taxpayers of the poorer variety for many decades…..it will now all come out in the wash.

    Bless cyberspace. .


  48. The search for evaders (and avoiders) has just begun.

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading