Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Caswell Franklyn, Head of Unity Workers Union
Caswell Franklyn, Head of Unity Workers Union

A court in Germany has sentenced Uli Hoeness, president of European football champions Bayern Munich, to three and a half years in jail for tax evasion. Hoeness turned himself in, hoping to get away from a prison term, when he got a tip off that he was under investigation by the German tax authorities for tax evasion. However, that ploy did not work because prosecutors argued that investigators were already pursuing his case and he was not therefore liable to benefit from turning himself in. It is interesting to note that he received the tip off, on the phone, when he was having lunch with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and that friendship was not sufficient to deter the public servants from doing their jobs.

I am not particularly concerned about who cheated the German taxman: I highlighted that case to contrast the difference Germany and Barbados if a big-up in this country was known to be cheating on his taxes.

I have it on good authority that the Inland Revenue Department is fully aware that the General Secretary of NUPW, Dennis Clarke has not paid the tax amounting to $24,000 per annum for the last four years, which is the tax payable on the value of the vehicle that he drives as part of his remuneration package.

Who can fault public workers if they feel that Clarke is not adequately representing them against the Government because he fears that the authorities would go after him for the $96,000 +interest and penalties that he owes?

SAY IT ISN’T SO!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

97 responses to “Union Sold Out for Tax Ease”

  1. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    Caswell, a good piece of whistle-blowing here!
    These bloody tax-dodgers need to be exposed.
    He is probably on those that Sir Frank Alleyne wanted to “out”.

    We wonder when Leroy Greenverbs will come under the radar.
    Those payments channeled through the D T Associates laundry were also intended to avoid the same net as Clarkie’s.


  2. Here is what a serious Barbados government needs to do starting with Courts Barbados who owes VAT 25 million.

    MBARGOED: NOT FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE MONDAY 17 MARCH

    Issued by Mattison Public Relations on behalf of Syscap

    HMRC ramps up use of powers to seize-and-sell business assets during recession to pay VAT bills

    • 14-fold increase in numbers of businesses targeted
    • Tough approach runs counter to “Time to Pay” scheme

    The number of businesses who have had assets seized and sold by HMRC to pay overdue VAT bills has soared during the recession as the taxman has ramped up its use of such powers, says Syscap, the leading independent finance provider.

    According to figures obtained by Syscap, 14 times more businesses were targeted last year than five years ago. 3,657 businesses had assets seized by HMRC last year* using its powers of ‘distraint’, compared to just 263 in 2008/9.

    Distraint means that the Revenue can remove goods or assets such as vehicles, machinery or IT equipment from business premises to sell off at public auction in order to settle unpaid tax bills. HMRC guidance states that it will start the process “as soon as possible” once it has written to companies concerned.

    HMRC raised £95.2 million from distraint for VAT last year. However Syscap says that the actual value of the assets sold is likely to dwarf this, because valuable assets such as stock or equipment are often sold at knock-down prices to achieve a quick sale.

    Comments Syscap Chief Executive Philip White, “The fact that there has been such a significant increase in the use of HMRC’s powers to seize-and-sell assets to recover VAT during the recession will be a huge concern to SMEs who have been struggling to cope during the downturn.”

    “When assets are seized and sold at firesale prices, the actual cost to the business far outstrips the original VAT bill. HMRC is only concerned with recovering the tax it is owed, not achieving the best price.”

    Syscap adds that if the sale does not raise enough to cover the tax bill, HMRC will take the business to court to recoup the rest.

    “This could be a real body-blow to SMEs but what’s even worse is that if business-critical assets are targeted, such as vital machinery or IT equipment, businesses may not be able to keep going at all,” says Philip White.

    Tough approach runs counter to “Time to Pay” scheme

    Syscap points out that the dramatic rise in the number of businesses targeted under HMRC’s distraint powers runs counter to the ethos of the “Time to Pay” scheme under which businesses can be granted an extension of their payment deadlines.

    Philip White says, “Businesses whose cashflow has been stuttering throughout the last five years of economic turmoil are finding that, as their financial struggles have increased, HMRC has become less and less lenient over late VAT payments.”

    “HMRC has adopted a far harder-line approach under increasing pressure from the Treasury to ensure it takes as much tax as it can to help fill in the hole in the public finances.”

    He adds, “SMEs have been finding it much harder during the downturn to cover the costs of paying VAT since the bank loans and overdraft facilities which were so readily available before the financial crisis have for many disappeared overnight.”

    “We are seeing more and more businesses looking for alternative ways to bridge critical funding gaps before they appear. They know when the deadlines are and they want to plan for them, they just need the right funding solution in place to smooth out the peaks and troughs in cashflow.”

    Syscap has seen a significant uptake of its Short Term Business Loans product since it was launched in [date]. This gives firms the facility for a flexible repayment plan to enable them to invest in critical projects or provide adequate finance to cover business costs such as tax bills over a 3-12 month repayment period.

    About Syscap Ltd

    Syscap is a provider of smart, cost effective finance and funding solutions. The company partners with many of the UK’s brightest and most ambitious organisations in the commercial, professional services and public sectors.

    Syscap’s specialist range of funding products and sector expertise underpin the company’s ability to meet the finance needs of its customers. Syscap removes the burden and complexity of securing finance and uses its expert knowledge to get the best terms for its customers, giving them the financial freedom to focus on their core activities and the profitable development of their organisations.

  3. DR. THE HONOURABLE Avatar
    DR. THE HONOURABLE

    Caswell -Yuh Lie ! Oh my golliwog, this story cant be true,

    Barbados cannot have declined to such a situation where Mr.Clarke could have avoided taxes in this manner.

    A lawsuit against Caswell Franklyn is therefore in order.

    I expect to see Clarke going to Court soon and not as a criminal so Caswell watch out my dear man, Clarke is out to get you.. In the fin

  4. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad

    DR. THE HONOURABLE | March 14, 2014 at 6:52 PM | @
    We see you have Jokes, and that is all that they are , Caswell Franklyn has more Honor than those who put that title before their Names.

    Audit Must Be Done, and all this from the top down PM AG, DPP, COP, Sirs, Lawyers,COW and Company and then You will see why we are so slow in Taxes,
    Beatrice Henry name was remove from the tax rolls after living and doing in Business in Barbados as far back as 1926, Violet Beckles Names was also Removed from the tax roll and remove from Land tax in order to defraud Her of Proof of ownership.
    Making money for the top crook pockets at Land Tax Mr . Ford and Inland rev.
    So now Crook ass Forde and Sir Forde can take PLANTATION DEEDS TO COURT also , We be Very proud to stand next to Caswell in a WAR of Truth against these Bitches, We also be nice If Sir Ham take there case in the High Court where Sir Ham is to be renting or leasing the High Court land to the Court ,Where the hell he get Deeds to say his has Power to do such , When Violet Beckles did not give or was part of Any agreement ,
    These crooks tell Big Black and White Business how to avoid the taxes , By telling them to close down the business and reopen under a different name , and lie and said it failed,


  5. Caswell I tune in today in time to hear your comments about civil servants signing agreements with Government that always seem to work to their detriment. Please advise as to your assessment of the quality of Dennis Johnson responses to you … Some gentleman called in afterwards and said that he enjoys taking instructions from both you and Johnson … I think maybe callers recognize the importance of buttering up moderators in this age of such complete deception

  6. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Dr. The Honourable

    Which part of the post you suspect is not accurate? I relied on the BBC for the information about Uli Hoeness. LOL! The other part, I can assure you that truth is an absolute defence to a lawsuit for defamation, so I am not worried.

  7. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ DR. THE HONOURABLE | March 14, 2014 at 6:52 PM

    Doesn’t the Inland Revenue Department encourage honest citizens to report those who are suspected of tax evasion?

    Even the new BRA promises to come down hard on tax cheats.
    Caswell has his facts to prove the man to be a tax dodger unless a cheque for the full amount of tax arrears, interest and penalties from either Clarke or the Union is sent to the IRD before 31 March 2014.
    We are sure the amount outstanding could have kept on 4 or 5 low-paid workers from the Drainage Unit.

    BTW, Sir Frank has a long list of Clarkies. But he is a coward, unlike Caswell.


  8. Who is paying Denis Depeiza’a jaunt down to Brazil?

    On Friday, 14 March 2014, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >


  9. A snippet from Flying Fish & Cou Cou.

    http://www.nationnews.com/articles/view/flying-fish-cou-cou-freundel-the-best-pm/

    They want to know . . .

    ​PATRONS OF A certain bar are still talking about the conversation they claim took place between two politicos.

    From what Cou Cou was told, the two individuals from the same party seemingly met by chance at the place some weeks ago. One was in their constituency having a quick drink and trying to catch up with some of the happenings in the particular district from their selected people, while the other apparently just popped in.

    After greeting each other they went to a table by themselves and began talking over a drink. The topic those who eavesdropped claim they heard was how the Government managed to outmanoeuvre the trade unions.

    From what we were told, the two politicos were wondering aloud how the unions could wait for a list of those to be retrenched when the timetable for the cuts was such that Government had to move with urgency.

    Apparently, the politicos were both amazed, but at the same time gloating that they managed to get over that hurdle with only a whimper from the unions, some chatter from the Opposition and little to nothing from the media.

    Cou Cou wants those two politicos to know that the people who overheard their conversation are ashamed of what they said, and a couple have vowed to deal with them the only way they can whenever the time comes.

  10. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad

    I can assure you that truth is an absolute defence to a lawsuit for defamation, so I am not worried.@
    Most crooks and friends dont want truth , They want long and longer talk till they are dead, Truth is a cure for Crooks, Liars and Scumbags ,


  11. A certain future coalitional regime of Barbados and of which the PDC will be part SHALL ABOLISH TAXATION in this country and replace it with the right strategies and approaches for the government coming by far, far more of its own revenues than now and for its being able to far, far fairer access than now of the money of the people of Barbados for its own greater uses.

    TAXATION IS EVIL, THEFT IS EVIL, TAXATION IS THEFT.

    In Barbados, TAXATION is the willful and dishonest expropriation by the government of Barbados of countless portions of the remuneration properties of the relevant individuals, businesses and other entities in this country, (and) with the intention of the said government of Barbados of permanently depriving the owners of those portions of their own remuneration properties.

    Given this absolute lawlessness by the government, all right thinking rational persons must either on their own or in concert with others continue to or begin to use ALL rational means at their disposal to STOP the government from STEALING and ROBBING them of their own remuneration properties.

    In the case of these persons having their own businesses and other entities, they must either on their own or in concert with other persons continue to or begin to use ALL rational means at their disposal to STOP the government from STEALING and ROBBING their own businesses and other entities of their own remuneration properties.

    So, DEATH to TAXATION

    PDC


  12. Inadvertence

    In the first paragraph, fifth line, one word is missing from that line. The word is “have”. Therefore, the line should have been written partly as…..and for its being able to HAVE far, far fairer access than now…..

    Our sincerest apologies.

    PDC

  13. HAMILTON A HILL Avatar
    HAMILTON A HILL

    It stands to reason that Caswell would not have written this piece unless he knew where he stood in terms of legal footing. This is what is wrong with Barbados and we all know this. The connected few are permitted to stifle the many at the bottom. Here comes the BLP talking about taking to the streets as if they intend to make a real difference. Here is a challenge to any sitting member of the BLP. Use the upcoming debate on the estimates to name and shame the selected few with scofflaw status who for so long have flown beneath the radar of publicity. You have used parliamentary privilege as protection against everything else so why not now? Show us all that the government in waiting is a serious one. Show us that someone is finally ready to amalgamate the two very clear and distinct sections of Barbados.


  14. ….so wait…!!!
    Wunna feel that um is a coincidence that Bushie hand picked Caswell for the post of chairman of the National Supervisory Committee?
    Wunna feel that Caswell easy nuh…?
    Boss…even some of wunna who talking will find wunna selves under scrutiny if and when we get BUP off and running….

    LOL
    Bushie mekking sure all he eyes dotted and he tees crossed and he whacker fully gassed ….before Caswell warm up bozie…..

    …but as man Caswell
    You gotta know the particular civil servant who has failed to pursue this specific matter against Clarkie…. LOL …and maybe even why…! 🙂


  15. @Caswell why did you choose a low income person to accuse?

    How about the those in the Million dollar bracket?

    You are the leader of a Union and you attack a leader of another Union.

    Bushie you sure you picked the right person for the post of chairman of the National Supervisory Committee?


  16. @Hants

    Your last comment is obviously meant to be provocative and a good batsman should shoulder arms.


  17. This blog would be like The Nation without provocative comments from “stit disturbers like me”


  18. Hants | March 15, 2014 at 8:40 AM |
    You are the leader of a Union and you attack a leader of another Union

    There is ample reason for that Caswell is a serial failed leader of unions. He envies the successful union leaders. Not only that his trade unions attract no membership. Who wants to associate with a bad minded grinch like Casweel. Why doesn’t he attack the minority business elite who raise the sand price by 85% to kill poor black house builders. Caswell never denigrates Jada Paul Lewis, Cow, Bizzy and that ilk who have a vice grip on the economy. He goes after low hanging fruit.


  19. Anyway given the apparent state of the Barbados economy this is nothing compared to the loss in revenue from construction workers now being laid off.


  20. Going for breakfast an come back. BU is going to hot today.


  21. @Fan aka waiting

    You are another JA. Wasn’t Caswell the first to put in the public domain that Courts has been let off the hook for 20+ million in VAT owed? Why does your government not aggressively collect or move in on tax defaulter who can pay? We will not put on the table tat CEO of Courts is the wife of Patrick Tannis. You yardfowl you.

  22. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ The Fan | March 15, 2014 at 9:08 AM
    ‘Caswell never denigrates Jada Paul Lewis, Cow, Bizzy and that ilk who have a vice grip on the economy. He goes after low hanging fruit.”

    You and the other apologists for Clarke with your personal anti Caswell vendetta are missing the kernel of the thread.
    It is alleged Mr. Clarke is in breach of the law i.e. the Income Tax Act.
    Are you suggesting blatant law breakers should go free in your country which claims to be governed by the rule of law and which recently celebrated 375 years of Parliament the highest court of the land?

    What do you mean by “low hanging fruit”? Is Leroy Greenverbs a low hanging fruitcake or is he ‘highly’ hung and protected by the DLP top brass monkey machinery living in a banana republic?

    If the people you referred to as ‘high-hanging fruit’ are in breach of the law why not “out” them as Caswell has done to his cheating opposite number in the Union movement?

    Here is what your leader promised the electorate of Barbados in February 2013, if returned to power:

    “Why Good governance? Good Governance is characterized by the principles of participation, consensus, accountability, transparency, responsiveness, effectiveness and efficiency, equity and inclusion, and the rule of law.
    It assures that corruption is minimized, the views of minorities are taken into account and that the voices of the most vulnerable in society are heard in decision-making and the allocation of resources.”

    Certainly blatant refusal to pay your fair share of taxes towards the pool of resources for efficient allocation can’t be considered a ‘plank’ of good governance especially when aided and abetted by the man sworn to uphold the rule of law!


  23. Caswell knows this already of course but to those who may want to debate the legal strength of Caswell’s position, In Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd the House of Lords ruled that there exists qualified privilege for the publication of defamatory statements in the public interest. This is a defence where it can be established that the journalist/publication had a duty to publish an allegation even if it turns out to be wrong. Subsequently the case of Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europeconfirmed this.

    There is a wide range of defences that may be pleaded in defamation worldwide, or almost worldwide, but the one that is most associated with the public interest is “qualified privilege”. The requirement of this defence is that the person making a statement had a duty to do so and that the person who hears, or reads, the statement had an interest in doing so and it is not limited to media. In Reynolds, the former Prime Minister of Ireland brought a defamation action in respect of his conduct in office. The defendant argued that the story should automatically attract privilege and the claimant be required to demonstrate malice. The House of Lords ruled that allowing this defence would “swing the pendulum too far away from the protection of reputation”, and set out instead 10 non-exhaustive guidelines for the public interest defence.

    1. The seriousness of the allegation, i.e. if the allegation is not true what will be the level of misinformation to the public and what will be the corresponding harm to the individual.
    2. The nature of the information and the extent to which the subject-matter is a matter of public concern.
    3. The source of the information and whether it is reliable or motivated by malice and/or avarice
    4. Whether suitable steps have been taken to verify the information
    5. Whether the allegation in a story has already been the subject of an investigation which commands respect
    6. Whether it is important that the story be published quickly
    7. Whether comment was sought from the claimant, or whether that was not necessary in the context of the story
    8. If the article includes the gist of the claimant’s version of events
    9. Whether the article is written in such a way as to amount to statements of fact, or whether it raises questions and is suggestive of the need for further investigation
    10. The timing of the publication

    In Galloway v Telegraph Group Ltd ([2006] EWCA Civ 17), the Court of Appeal of England and Wales ruled that the newspaper had not held to the guidelines and instead published “embellished” reports about links to Saddam Hussein.

  24. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    David

    Thanks for the defence. However, I can assure you that I have done a lot of reading on the subject for my own protection, as far as I am aware, I have written the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

    I felt it necessary to publish this information at this time because I felt that it was vital that public workers, who are being adversely affected by the formation of the revenue authority, should have all the facts. Also, that they would be able to draw their own conclusions as to why the NUPW was not vigorously putting their case.

    >


  25. @Caswell

    Give us a timeline if you can starting when you made the revelation on the call-in that a list was being prepared to send home 10 thousand public workers, we had vigorous denial rebuttal by Dennis Clarke and the MoF, then there was a statement by Clarke that the NUPW was instrumental in saving several jobs forcing the number down from 6 thousand to 3 thousand.

  26. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    David

    In May last year, I received information about a meeting where they were planning to send home a number of workers, the number, 6,000, was inadvertently revealed by the Minister of Finance when he went on radio to deny what I was saying. I had received very credible information from that source who was reliable in the past and I had no reason to doubt the person but I verified the information with one other person who was in attendance.

    I called Brasstacks and revealed what I had learnt. Immediately, I was pounced upon by no lesser persons than Clarke, Maloney and Sinckler who denied all. The Minister, as is his character, was even abusive.

    After my revelations, a smaller group reconvened and decided that in light of the denial by the Minister they had to take a different approach. As a result, they started terminating small groups of workers monthly which did not generate a lot of publicity. When they got to the Post Office, the workers went to the press and they got their jobs back far a while.

    They used the alternate process to send home over 2,000 persons which when added to the current 3,000 plus would have brought the number up to the 6,000. The numbers are being reduced by 6,000 only that the first group are not being considered as lay-offs.

    To make a long story short: Clarke was just lying plain and simple. No jobs were saved by any union.

    >


  27. To Dr Clyde Mascoll

    In your column piece in the Daily Nation newspaper of Thursday, March 13, 2013, it was reported in that said piece the following: “Since 2011, the Barbados economy has not grown or contracted; it has remained about the same. However, the VAT is a transactional tax and it is obvious that stagnant economic activity will affect the collection of revenue from this source. The notion that VAT should be abandoned and replaced by a sales tax demonstrates a comprehensive level of ignorance”.

    Dr Mascoll, from that statement attributed to your mind, it is becoming more and more absolutely clear why the so-called economics profession – here and elsewhere – and of which you are a part of – shall becoming more and more discredited and disrespected by so many other people in Barbados and elsewhere.

    It is incredible that – out of the whole content of your last column – you only managed to set up one very small but very flawed irrational premiss ( that VAT is a transactional tax) and to set up another very large and twisted premiss (that there is stagnant (??) economic activity in Barbados), still you did not manage to even explain how you came to the very grossly false conclusion that you did come to (that such will (adversely) affect the collection of revenue).

    Anyhow while we will not be getting involved in this inevitable intellectual tussle between you and the Governor of the Central Bank, Dr Worrell, and Senator Marshall, over what is a criminal illegal anti-productive anti-people subsystem of the wider criminal illegal anti-productive anti-people TAXATION system in Barbados, we will just simply state for the benefit of the understanding of many people who come to this BU and who read our many posts, that it is absolutely wrong and erroneous for you to impute that it is the lower levels of political economy and services industry activities that are causing lower VAT THEFT proceeds for the government, when you must know that, in any given year in Barbados, TAXATION, including higher levels of it, and TAXATION, inclusive of VAT and higher levels of it, will bring about – relative to TAXATION and VAT – lower levels of remunerations for the relevant persons, businesses and other entities at the national level – which will bring about lower levels of TAXATION and VAT THEFT proceeds later on.

    And this is fundamentally so, irrespective of what ever amounts of commercial transactions there would be in the country at any specified time, and given that there is, at any given time in Barbados, a relatively fixed amount of money circulating in this country.

    And we are dealing here with just money, and not any false fictitious numbers falsely figuring for remunerations in this political economy eand services industry sectors of Barbados.

    Finally given that money is the best measure of remunerations and TAXATION, and that there is NO relationship between those variables and material production and distribution services in the commercial sectors of Barbados, it must mean it is a combination of the relevant human beings and their services, commercial resources, machines, and other things that determine the levels of real business commercial activities in this country.

    As a Doctorate, too, you must know have reached a level of knowledge that speaks to the reality that, whereas the TAXATION system in Barbados can (and with human beings being virtually the only entities making up this TAXATION system and behaving among themselves in such specific ways as to define TAXATION itself) – in this sense only – help to prevent hinder discontinue greater levels of business activity, it cannot help to initiate continue increase whatever any particular levels of business activity in Barbados.

    So even though you are correct that focus must be put by many people, businesses and others on growing the commercial material and services sectors, you reasonably cannot dismiss the notion that TAXATION is helping to prevent such growth in these sectors.

    And this is what Taxation is doing and not doing in Barbados right now.

    So there you go, Dr Mascoll.

    PDC


  28. If caswell is so positive on legal grounds why! not publish the same information in his weekly column the nation.i guess BU is where all the sh..t can be unloaded without fear of reprisal would be interesting to hear Balance take on this


  29. @jezzebel

    Another BU detractor and here is your answer, a thorn by any other name is still a thorn.

  30. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Jezzebel with two”z”

    I have written several columns that were absolutely true and submitted them to the Nation which did not pass the editors. Subsequently, I submitted the same ones to BU and they were published without any adverse consequences to myself. I have come to learn which pass the editor.

    I choose not to lie and my submissions would not generate lawsuits because as I have already said, truth is an absolute defence to defamation. Mind you, it is always truth that I can prove.


  31. @Caswell

    And you neglected to state the obvious, it matter not which medium you post because you use your real name unlike ”jezzebel”.


  32. Plantation………who is sir HAM?? can’t say i know the pimp unless he goes by another name, i understand the land the new supreme court is built on belongs to CLICO…….something stinks.

  33. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    I just did a calculation and it appears that Clarke now owes $124,320 which represents $96,000 in income tax plus $28,320 in interest and penalties.


  34. @Dr Mascoll

    Is VAT not a sales tax?

  35. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Caswell Franklyn | March 15, 2014 at 1:33 PM |

    Caswell you might be right in principle (Clarkie does owe the Treasury taxes) but are you sure about the $96,000 figure?
    If that is for a 4 year period it means $24,000 tax payable per annum.
    That would have to be an awfully expensive vehicle to be driven around by a trade unionist. The $24,000 might be the imputed annual taxable value of the benefit arising from the personal use of motor vehicle bought by the NUPW and assigned to the G S.

    The annual benefit is normally calculated at 10% of the cost of the vehicle which would indicate the original cost to be around $240,000. The annual benefit of $24,000 should therefore attract personal income tax at the marginal rate of 35%.

    My observation, however, does not in anyway vitiate your contention that Clarkie is a blatant tax dodger The amount of the tax avoided might be assessed differently but the principle of tax evasion remains in place. He is not the GG or a judge.


  36. @Miller

    BU is going to ask you the hard 64 thousand question in the vain of what we posed to Harry Husbands on the other blog, AGAIN. How long is too long before the BLP Opposition led by MAM break rank and stop colluding with government – as governments and Oppositions have done over the years – about how the nastiness of governance in Barbados is covered up? Do you think key players in the Opposition are not aware of how tax offenders are pampered for example as in the case of Clarke? The Estimates Debate gives the Opposition and MAM a chance to build credibility by departing from the old useless and meaningless exchanges which in the final analysis does not make an iota of difference to government policy.


  37. David
    For the cause that lacks assistance, The wrong that needs resistance, For the future in the distance, And the good that I [BU] can do.

    Using your moto, above can you please investigate why the Barbados Football Association would be advertising for a general secretary from overseas because no suitable applicant was found in Barbados?

    Why would Randy Harris Lime Football partner Mia Mottley not get him to employ one of the bright Barbadians who were laid off from government? It is said by many that Barbadians are the biggest hypocrites in the world

    Is it only government and unions that must be criticize?


  38. @Clone

    The Barbados Football Association is a loss cause which is sheltered by the conniving policies of FIFA. It has been a den of corruption sanctioned under successive administrations. How do you know the decision to recruit outside is not a FIFA directive given the malfeasance which has occurred under the watch of Ronald Jones?

  39. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ David | March 15, 2014 at 2:49 PM |

    There is great merit in your question.
    It seems they all have one another backs in this charade of Tweedledum and Tweedledee Bajan incestuous governance model.

    Even if the BLP were to regain the reins of government this year nothing will be done about Clarkie or Leroy Parris or the other myriad of crooks and scammers backing both parties.

    Bush Tea’s proposed model is beginning to gaining a bit of traction with me (except for the BBE component, of course).


  40. millertheanunnaki | March 15, 2014 at 2:25 PM | “Caswell you might be right in principle (Clarkie does owe the Treasury taxes) but are you sure about the $96,000 figure?”

    Surely you are wrong Miller.


  41. @ Miller
    Bush Tea’s proposed model is beginning to gain a bit of traction with me (except for the BBE component, of course
    ++++++++++++++++++++
    🙂
    So are you saying that you are a bit slow….and that therefore there is a better than even chance that you will eventually ALSO get to recognize that BBE is the KEY part of Bushie’s proposed model…..

    @ David
    What FIFA should really do is send a no-nonsense AUDITOR every year or two with a fine-tooth comb and a sharp tongue….
    Sending foreigners to baby sit us is condescending to say the least….it CERTAINLY is not developmental.

    By the way…..
    Who audits the Sports Lottery?
    Who does the audit?
    How much EXACTLY is spent where, on what… and by whom?

    Anybody ever heard of PROACTIVE problem solving…?
    …or perhaps we will wait until that is broke and recruit a Canadian to run THAT too….

    @ Caswell
    When the donkey will you start to play the role for which you have been prepared bout here though…?
    Steupssss


  42. @Bushie. you are joking. FIFA needs more auditing than the BFA.


  43. @Hants

    And this is the point.

  44. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Bush Tea | March 15, 2014 at 3:35 PM |

    That version of the B T governance model with the BBE being the main ingredient will never fly with me. I draw a line in the sand where that is concerned.
    But the pragmatic side of your model is worth looking into.

    I will tell you what, Bushie.
    See your model in the same light as the Estwick alternative plan and the Miller as Fumble. I promise you that if Stuartie accepts the Estwick plan and rejects the Sinckler plan the miller will eat humble pie and cross the line to join B T’s parade.

    But remember Bushie, a promise is a comfort to a fool. Ask the CLICO policyholders, Al Barrack, the public sector workers and the UWI undergraduate students who fooled them other than the miller pretending to fumble in climbing onto the B T express bandwagon to paradise.


  45. To the other 64 thousand question: what of the local media? We have a social commentator and head of a registered trade union who has gone public on the Internet with a weighty accusation pointed at the general secretary of a leading trade union – so what is the local media going to do? Don’t we all know the answer already? Not one damp thing.


  46. FIFA needs more auditing than the BFA .. HA HA HA… it might be true, but it is funny .. ha ha ha

  47. Green Silk Suit Avatar
    Green Silk Suit

    Miller

    It does not matter whether Stuartie accepts the Estwick plan, the reality is that its too late now. The moment devaluation becomes apparent this government WILL be removed from office, willingly or NOT.

  48. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Miller

    I was out for a while and I am only now seeing your comment at 2:55 p.m.

    You are correct, the car is valued at approximately $240,000. However, to be fair the NUPW only paid $60,000. The Minister of Finance waived the duty and taxes using the power he has under Duties, Taxes and other Payments (Exemption) Act, Cap 67B. However, I am yet to see the order published in the Official Gazette after more than four years.

    Additional information is now in order. When the car was first purchased, the union’s accounts staff contacted the Inland Revenue Department for guidance. They were told how much money was to be deducted but Clarke ordered them not to make the deduction. This is not hearsay, I was employed at NUPW when this went down and was present to hear Clarke threaten an individual who he claimed was being malicious.

    >


  49. @ David. ..when making reference to the BFA please understand that malfeasance started long before the Jones era began. As a matter of fact the BFA has always exhibited traits similar to some statutory corporations.There are stories of gate receipts that suddenly disappeared as if Houdini were involved, just like the fare boxes at the transport board back in the early eighties.


  50. @Hamilton Hill

    Agree BUT Minister Ronald Jones is the last president who served as minister and we have placed a lot of blame on his head.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading