Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Douglas
Owen Arthur would not want anything to do with Mia Mottley's eminent persons group.
“Owen Arthur would not want anything to do with Mia Mottley’s eminent persons group”

It is worth repeating- Sandiford’s structural adjustment programme of the 90s right-sized the public service of Barbados. It is worth stating that the Owen Arthur administration from 1994 started the process of inflating the ranks of the public service of Barbados. Growing the government; to the detriment of the private sector of Barbados – an unsustainable economic policy. He failed to take the advice at the turn of the century to reduce the size of the civil service by 10,000 spread over 10 years. The warning signs were there. But he failed to take the corrective measures.

Owen Arthur would not want anything to do with Mia Mottley’s eminent persons group. He knows that such a group would point fingers at him for failing to continue the restructuring of the Barbados economy which he had inherited from Sandiford. Like the prodigal son, for 14 years he partied, feasted, and feted spending the surplus revenue from the VAT and money borrowed for a rainy day, wasting billions of dollars on dead-end projects (Greenlands, Dodds Prison, Highway Expansion, Kensington, Crab Hill Police Station, and Eastry House). He also presided over decisions which left us with very little space to manoeuvre: the sale of the national bank, the insurance company and selling off the private sector of Barbados to foreign interest. Not to mention the first three downgrades of Barbados’ credit rating.

When you are managing an economy in good times you are expected to make provision and savings for hard times. Arthur did not do this. This was his greatest failure as a leader. He did not have the vision or foresight to adequately prepare for the future.

In 2008, the Barbados Labour Party was voted out for their mismanagement of public funds. Do we remember the cost overrun bill which stood at over a billion dollars? That was money which was wasted, spent and not saved. What a difference it would make today if the Owen Arthur administration had been able to save that money for a rainy day! One of the things which make the Singapore economy great is that they actually save their surplus budget and set it aside for a rainy day. The Arthur administration, which had the opportunity, never did it. When Ms. Mottley advised him as the Minister with responsibility for Economic Affairs she too did not have the foresight to suggest such. What a difference it would make to civil servants if those rainy day savings were available now.

Not only did Arthur fail to save, he failed to invest in projects which would put the Barbados economy on a sustainable growth path. Why is it that we have to wait until now in 2014 for the Sanitation Service Authority to invest millions to construct a Waste-to-Energy plant? Why didn’t Arthur invest the millions spent on Greenland on such a project?

Why is it that we have to wait until 2014 to invest millions of dollars in the construction of a purpose built designated cruise pier to expand Barbados’ potential in cruise tourism and also create a hub for the expansion and development of our cultural industries in Barbados?

Why is it that we had to wait until 2013 to revolutionise our energy generation capacity in Barbados by passing legislation and creating a suite of investment incentives to grow the renewable energy sector in Barbados?

Why is it that we had to wait until 2014 to put serious plans in place to revitalize the sugar industry in Barbados? By building a multipurpose plant capable of producing a number of by products from sugar cane we will be developing a sugar cane industry.

Why is it that we had to wait until 2013 for the Sandals brand to join the Barbados tourism product helping the country to boost airlift from the Canadian and UK markets? Soon, Sandals will be investing over US$65 million into the economy creating over 1000 jobs in construction during the “sandalisation” of Sandals Casuarina.

Why is it that we had to wait until 2008 to recognise that NHC was wasting millions of dollars trying to build office complexes and could do a better job of building housing accommodations for Barbadians?

The answer to those questions – the Owen Arthur administration lacked vision. They did not know then how to restructure the economy of Barbados and they cannot offer today a solution to the economic challenges which the economy is presently facing. That is why Owen wants nothing to do with the eminent persons group. That is why in his opinion Mia was just about political gimmicks. He knows that the only thing that comes from her mouth is, “march!” Marching does not solve economic or financial crisis.

To all Barbadians we are making sacrifices to put the Barbados economy back on track. It is our hope that the sacrifices which are being made now will be brief. The Barbados economy will revive and you can help it to grow. We encourage you to grasp the opportunity for training and re-tooling during this time. Sharpen your skills and help us to build a stronger and more sustainable economy and society. We need to put our minds and talents to creative uses. We need to produce, we need to be creative, and we need to be innovative.

http://www.dlpbarbados.org/site/corrective-measures/

https://www.facebook.com/DLPBB


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

209 responses to “Operation Corrective Measures”


  1. “Sargeant | February 8, 2014 at 12:08 AM |
    A cautionary tale, Puerto Rico’s debt has been downgraded to “junk status”

    Who cares, Sarge. I live in Barbados and am already having much stress thinking about the state of our economy and what the future hold for my children with me now having to fund their education despite all the taxes I have paid over the years to be concerned with the economic problems of all places Puerto Rico.


  2. David

    Barbados biggest expense on the current account is debt service, that is a fact. Neither Wagers and Salaries or Subsidies and Transfers account for as much as debt service.

    We have tried taxing our way out of the recession, it has failed. Lay-offs will only compound that failure. It will reduce economic activity, reduce tax collection and put a strain on the NIS.

    Estwick is calling for a full burden sharing arrangement. Refinance the national debt using several tools (UAE) only be one, sale of assets and maybe as a worst case scenario lay-offs.


  3. @Warinka

    You have stated a worrying reality but BU is more concerned with the need to change behaviour between the players and to probe government’s commitment to a new way forward. We cannot that this government has borrowed a ton of money in the last 6 years to support consumption and largess.


  4. @ Confused
    Boss, you are the most level headed and UN-confused poster on this blog. You have hit the nail SQUARLY on the head.
    Persons should be judged by the FACTS of what they have been able to accomplish in their past….not rhetoric…
    Bushie likes Dr. Estwick because he is known to talk a lotta shiite at political meetings and has a fun oratorical approach.

    If this proposal is therefore going to be discussed somewhere, Bushie will listen because it is sure to be entertaining.

    But Bushie is unaware of ANY history of management success!, financial wizardry, or conceptual brilliance from the goodly doc….

    Sell debt to the Arabs?
    Wunna are brass bowls?
    ….mean the fellows that in the Middle East?
    Wunna ever went there?
    Wunna have any idea what their political systems are like?

    ….boss…..those are modern day slave societies….Wuh only a Brass Bowl would consider such a move….
    ….but then again…..we bought an abandoned hotel for $100M , plan to knock it down, borrow $500M to build it back…..to give way….

    A drowning man grabs at straws, but shiite man,…that is more like a drowning man grabbing at his own excrement….
    Far better to go to the IMF……who will INSIST on good financial management….(but of course that is what we are trying to avoid isn’t it?)


  5. Simple question: who is responsible for the economic mess, lack of growth and print of money?

    From my point of view it is Sinckler. He has be single handled had responsible for the financial affairs of this country since 2010. So the man who destroyed the economy is going to be left to fix it?

    Lets keep the fox guarding the hen house, that’s worked brilliantly thus far.

  6. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ balance | February 8, 2014 at 7:32 AM |
    “But Douggie, such is the confusion of which we speak. you are saying one thing and a Senior minister of government is saying another.”

    Balance, Douggie and his other dogged followers on board the sinking DLP ship are unable to see the contradiction or ‘paradox of confusion’ contained in the position they defend.
    Estwick is privy to information which confirms the country is heading into the privatization and devaluation arms of the IMF and is trying to distance himself from the pending economic meltdown that would see the dismantling of many social services the DLP likes to lie about.

    But unlike the boy on the burning deck or the legendary one with his finger in the hole of the leaking dyke he will not be seen as a hero but a major accomplice.

    Too late shall be Estwick’s cry.
    The Fumbler is just playing with his lapdog. After he makes his presentation and promises made the umpteenth time Estwick will return to his shell (or is it kennel?) to bark like a muzzled pit bull at the Opposition in and out of Parliament.
    Check the cussing the media, especially the DLP’s bête noir the Nation newspaper and its cousin VOB/Starcom, would soon come under and be blamed for destabilizing the country and triggering a devaluation of its country.

    The IMF know full well confidence in the current administration is much, much too low to form any basis of recovery and have moved in to protect certain foreign interests.


  7. @Warinka

    Simple question: who is responsible for the economic mess, lack of growth and print of money?

    From my point of view it is Sinckler. He has be single handled had responsible for the financial affairs of this country since 2010. So the man who destroyed the economy is going to be left to fix it?

    Lets keep the fox guarding the hen house, that’s worked brilliantly thus far.

    Estwick was a member of the Cabinet when all the decisions were made which invokes collective responsibility. With all the discussion about the consolidation of the revenue agencies where did he think the policy was leading?


  8. Estwick is on record as voicing his concern about the economic policies since 2009.
    The idiots in the Cabinet gotvto be foolish to believe that those who have the most to financial lose are going to sit idly by and face a devaluation without resorting to unorthodox tactics to remove this government from office, even if it cost them a few million dollars.


  9. @ Warinka
    To say that Sinckler is responsible for any economic failure is to display your total ignorance of how government is conducted. You would do well to try and improve your obvious lack of knowledge .


  10. @ balance
    …clearly you did not stay at a Holiday Inn last night.

    Sargeant’s comment about Puerto Rico’s downgrade was surely meant to bring a broader perspective to Barbados’ issues.
    Wuh cuh dear…..if other (and bigger) boats in the sea sinking and rolling, ….does it not say that our problems may be more EXTERNAL than internal.
    …obviously if there is a BIG storm going on, it may not be the best time to shoot the captain. RATHER , it may make sense to put ALL heads together and try to ride out the storm – and THEN shoot the BB.

    Bushie hope that your balance returns soon… 🙂


  11. just ge

    Really now?

    So tell me then, why was the entire Cabinet excluding Sinckler unaware when Sinckler announced retrenchment the day the IMF team left Barbados and why were they all still unaware when Sinckler made a Parliamentary Statement confirming 3,000 being sent home?

    I know how Caninet government works and is suppose to work. However that is not what is happening in Barbados at this time.

    It is a fact that the Cabinet of Barbados did not make a decision to retrench workers before Sinckler’s public utterances to that effect.

    Why does the Cabinet of Barbados still have a copy of the signed IMF agreement negotiated by Worrell and signed by Sinckler?


  12. Still not have a copy. Sorry.


  13. @Warinka,
    It would be interesting to hear from you as to why it isn’t a wise political decision, to lay off highly paid unionized public sector workers in an economic recession? Or are you expecting those us to trust your qualified opinion?


  14. @Bush Tea

    Even if your position is correct, and we know it is, it makes it all the more a priority for Barbados to make the very best decision to minimize the hemorrhaging.

  15. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ balance | February 8, 2014 at 7:45 AM |
    “WHAT ABOUT MAM MOTTLEY MILLER, WLL SHE EVER GIVEN THE NASTINESS GOING ON IN THE BLP?”

    You mean to say balance, you guys are stuck between a rock and a hard place with Fumble slowly turning the rollers of the torture rack.

    Why doesn’t Wickham do a poll (financed by the “Eminent Persons Group”) to see who is nearest to the top of the leadership totem pole?

    He can do a poll with a question phrased as follows:

    Who would you prefer to see as the leader of the country to bring us out of the current mess? Put the following in order of preference:

    Fumble
    Sinckliar
    OSA
    Lapdog Estwick
    MIA
    Pornville

    None of the above

    Which one would be your choice for the number one spot, balance?


  16. Warinka | February 8, 2014 at 7:54 AM |

    David

    Barbados biggest expense on the current account is debt service, that is a fact. Neither Wagers and Salaries or Subsidies and Transfers account for as much as debt service.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Without the figures to support them, those statements are pretty hard to believe.

    I am aware of how it is in some companies and I don’t believe Government could be so completely different.

    Let’s see the figures first before jumping to conclusions based on these assertions.


  17. Mark Fenty

    Those being lay-off are highly paid? Don’t make yourself a jackass boy.


  18. Warinka, could at least give some kind of an indication as to why you think this is an ill- adviced decision on the part of the ruling government? Since, the federal, state and municipal governments did exactly this during the initial stages of the economic meld down in the United States.


  19. John

    Debt Service/ Amortisation expense is projected to be bds$1.2 billion dollars at the end of the current financial year. That is more that Wages & Salaries and Subsidies & Transfers. Goods & Services being the smallest expense.

    Total government revenue is project to be bds$2.5 billion. You do the math cause by my calculations debt service it is approaching 50% of total revenue.

  20. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Warinka | February 8, 2014 at 7:54 AM |
    “Estwick is calling for a full burden sharing arrangement. Refinance the national debt using several tools (UAE) only be one, sale of assets and maybe as a worst case scenario lay-offs.”

    Warinka, you are really making real sense based on obvious inside information.

    But tell us what are these ‘assets’ that could be up for sale? Certainly not the QEH?
    How about the GAIA that just got a fantastic sales plug from the V P Biden? This is the time to find a buyer to demand a premium. The proceeds could be used to help reduce or refinance the massive debt you pointed out is fiscally crippling Barbados to service.
    What do you have to say to that?


  21. Warinka, unionized public sector workers enjoy better pay than their counterparts in the private sector. I am a public sector worker; need I say more?


  22. @John

    The IMF has reported and it was validated by Freundel Stuart;

    A statement issued at the end of the review on Friday noted that Barbados’ wage bill rose to 10.3 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the highest in the region.

    Read more: http://www.caribbean360.com/index.php/news/barbados_news/1090117.html#ixzz2sjb6nkNg


  23. @ David
    Very simple.
    Because we CANNOT afford the cost of the self inflicted damage that will be caused by shooting the BB in the middle of a crisis.
    There is nothing worse than blue on blue casualties during a hot battle.

    @ Warinka
    You are just making Estwick and the other MPs look like the pack of jackasses that we have long worked out that they must be…..
    Wuh if you have a whole cabinet of ministers and two second rate intellectually challenged jokers can bypass wunna, railroad wunna and ignore wunna…. What you want Bajans to do….beg fuh wunna?

    Steupsssss
    Get together the “formerly eager” eleven (FEE); put together a coalition group including opposition members, and go and see the GG some day when Fumble asleep……
    …then get him to announce that he is stepping down ‘to get married’ ….or some shiite….
    Steupssss

    Why wunna does go and get elected and then can’t botch a peg…..


  24. Internal CBB figures reveal:-

    2012; Wages & Salaries $870 M
    Debt Service/ Amortisation $1,2340 M
    Subsidies & Transfers $ 1.073 M


  25. David

    Barbados also has the Debt to GDP in the region. Project to be 148% of GDP.


  26. Real GDP Growth – CBB

    2007 – 1.69%
    2008 – 0.33%
    2009 – (4.15)%
    2010 – 0.25%
    2011 – 0.68%
    2013 – (0.8) %
    2014 – (1.0) % projected

  27. are-we-there-yet? Avatar
    are-we-there-yet?

    If Warinka has been consistent in anything in his posts on BU it has been on anything related to David Estwick. He has been right everytime re. his prior disclosures on steps that DE were going to make, what was the detailed rationale for his statements, etc. I think we can therefore take it that Warinka is a devoted confidante and defender of David Estwick.

    If that is so, then he should warn DE that the PM is very consistent in his methodology and the outturns are not usually predictable by ordinary folk, as attested to in the various crises the PM encountered since assuming the hellum of leadership, e.g. Alexandra and the Eager 11. The PM appears to make up his mind on situations without being apprised of all the facts; He leaves others to do all the dirty work; He refuses to talk with the side of the dispute that he is not in favour with; He comes up with a no-brainer solution that catspraddles that person or persons, but sometimes having to change horses in mid stream when his original horse is clearly problematic; When that happens he recycles the earlier approach with a different horse.

    The above scenario seems to be playing out again with this DE affair.
    DE was ignored by the PM up to yesterday according to the media. Yesterday, according to Barbados Today, the PM accommodated him. i.e. Up to yesterday the PM was not aware of the danger that DE posed to the DLP and perhaps Barbados as well in his bull in a china shop reaction to the PM’s and the DLP cabinet’s intransigence on the matter that DE was pleading to them to consider and give him a hearing on.

    The PM now seems to be aware of the seriousness of the situation and, perhaps too late, might switch horses but the changeover is not going to improve in any way the confidence that major players have in him and his way of doing business or with a resolution of the underlying problem.


  28. An you guys want to leave Sinckler and the bald head man at the CBB to continue to wreck the economy?

  29. Frustrated Businessman Avatar
    Frustrated Businessman

    “The IMF know full well confidence in the current administration is much, much too low to form any basis of recovery and have moved in to protect certain foreign interests.”

    And the sooner the better.


  30. are-we-there-yet

    You are very generous in your assumptions.

    The DLP has won the elections, Sinckler has helped in that regard by printing money and lying to everyone in Barbados, including the Cabinet.

    However that chapter is now closed, time to get on with the serious business of fixing Barbados economic problems. Sinckler can’t do it, everyone knows that.

  31. are-we-there-yet? Avatar
    are-we-there-yet?

    Warinka;
    Did the Director of Finance and Planning give the PM wrong information or did the PM misunderstand the information which the DFP gave him? Also, do you think that the PM realize that he is circulating incorrect information to al the various groups that he has been talking to recently in an effort to explain why it is absolutely necessary to send home the 3000 workers.


  32. @Frustrated Businessman

    Sadly you are correct.


  33. Debt Service is only one part of the expense, the other part is Amortisation. Can you pay interest on a loan only or is split between interest and principle?


  34. This Estwick matter has become most intriguing. Likely BU will devote a blog for tomorrow on the matter.

  35. are-we-there-yet? Avatar
    are-we-there-yet?

    John; I’ve noted that the total expenditure chart appears to bear out Warinka’s figures not the PM’s.

  36. are-we-there-yet? Avatar
    are-we-there-yet?

    Warinka; Re. your 9.26 am post, I agree totally.


  37. @ Warinka

    You discuss debt servicing as though it is independent of wages and transfers.
    Are we not borrowing money to pay said wages and transfers? Or, am I mistaken and is this debt completely separate?
    If we became so indebted because we don’t earn enough to pay your expenses is it not more critical that we tackle the source of the debt in the first place?
    Reducing the cost of credit is not without merit but why are the UAE so keen to offer something other financial institutions are unwilling to do?

  38. disinterested observer Avatar
    disinterested observer

    i suspect commentators may be missing a potentially significant variable in the equation. To entertain possible contrary “solutions” from DE would suggest that all the emminent advisory economic gorrilifants in barbados including the only one worth his salt ( FA, DB, DW) where clueless… we obviously cant have that. btw… any recent comment from FA?


  39. are-we-there-yet? | February 8, 2014 at 9:34 AM |

    John; I’ve noted that the total expenditure chart appears to bear out Warinka’s figures not the PM’s.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Where did you find that chart?


  40. Confused | February 8, 2014 at 9:38 AM |

    Reducing the cost of credit is not without merit but why are the UAE so keen to offer something other financial institutions are unwilling to do?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    UAE must be trying to get back what it spent on the 13 tricycle ambulances it gave the Government.

  41. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Confused | February 8, 2014 at 9:38 AM |
    “Reducing the cost of credit is not without merit but why are the UAE so keen to offer something other financial institutions are unwilling to do?”

    You really have to be confused if you were to fall for such financial nonsense and spin.
    When Estwick can fulfil his promise and get the Japanese to finance the sugar cane industry project as promised in the August 2013 budget, then we could possibly listen to him about some $5 billion pipedream.
    As if Arab financiers would take up that kind of money and invest it in a tiny country lacking in natural resources or large scale agricultural lands for the production of tradable commodities.
    That kind of investment will find itself in some resource-rich African country on the economic ascendancy to compete with the Chinese than in Barbados with only its sunset tourism industry.

    Don’t you think it’s time you guys stop taking these outbursts of nonsense as gospel and see the light. You should ask yourself which comes first. The Devaluation egg or the $5 billion chicken?

  42. Caswell Franklyn Avatar

    Confused

    You are really confused and therefore only repeating nonsense about the civil service that you heard something about. Any problems in the service with productivity stems from politicians intruding into areas where they have no competence and indeed no duty to intervene.

    Let me give a recent example. With all the lay-off and reassignments, the godson of a minister was reassigned to a particular department displacing another worker. He was assigned work and he promptly refused because he did not like the duties associated with his job. To accommodate him they shifted around someone else so that he can get his preferred pick. We were made to understand that he is only there until the Revenue Authority comes on stream. What is particularly reprehensible about the whole matter is that the jobs at the Revenue Authority have not even been advertised and he knows that he is getting one of the jobs even before serving officers that work in the departments that will form the authority. The little prick is already throwing around his weight and you would ask what weight would a clerical officer have. Well it was enough to get the permanent secretary to upset a whole department to accommodate him.

    In relation to Estwick and his suitability to be Minister of Finance. He might not be the ideal person but there are no others in the Cabinet that have any knowledge or skill in the area. Currently we have a MOF who does not understand the difference between 0.7 and 0.07

    >

  43. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @disinterested observer | February 8, 2014 at 9:42 AM |
    “i suspect commentators may be missing a potentially significant variable in the equation. To entertain possible contrary “solutions” from DE would suggest that all the emminent advisory economic gorrilifants in barbados including the only one worth his salt ( FA, DB, DW) where clueless… we obviously cant have that. btw… any recent comment from FA?”

    Next week Thursday the PM will have a set of ear plugs ready and possibly a large jug of coffee to stop him from falling asleep as is his predilection.
    The self-taught economist’s much talked about presentation would just be another dud of drivel allowed to go off merely to massage the fella’s massive jumped-up ego and will be dismissed out of hand by the more “learned” bullshitters.
    The question to be asked is if the substantive MoF will be in attendance or will he feign some sickness due to stress and overworked?
    What about the Governor of the CB along with any IMF representative?

    This Cabinet business is becoming more comical by the day.
    It’s like having the circus of “brass bowls” in town 24/7 of never a dull moment.


  44. Caswell
    If Bushie was a union leader – the bushman would be ASHAMED to write your above comment.
    Surely you are not telling us that you KNOW about this shiite and just dropping snide remarks on BU about um…..

    You getting soft in your old age or Wuh?
    That pick as Chairman of the Natonal Supervisory Committee looking shaky yuh…..

    So why the union ain’t calling names…..shaming Brass bowl ministers, Permanent secretaries, board chairmen, Minister of civil service and anyone else even slightly related…?

    How you just letting this ride ….and picking on Confused – who is not confused AT ALL!
    The root of our problems lie in UNPRODUCTIVELY and dishonesty…..and YOU have a major role in the latter ….which you need to step up…..


  45. @Caswell

    Who is this person, the godson?


  46. @ Miller
    “It’s like having the circus of “brass bowls” in town 24/7 of never a dull moment”

    You don’t get it do you….?
    Bringing a circus of brass bowls to this town is like throwing salt water in the sea……


  47. @Balance
    Who cares, Sarge. I live in Barbados and am already having much stress thinking about the state of our economy and what the future hold for my children with me now having to fund their education despite all the taxes I have paid over the years to be concerned with the economic problems of all places Puerto Rico
    +++++++++++++
    Yuh think the world ends at Barbados doorstep? I chose to highlight that PR despite its “Commonwealth” status with the US has its debt downgraded because they followed the same path that Barbados has pursued. So keep navel gazing that stress you are under will soon send the pain to another part of your anatomy.

  48. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Caswell Franklyn | February 8, 2014 at 10:44 AM |
    “Let me give a recent example. With all the lay-off and reassignments, the godson of a minister was reassigned to a particular department displacing another worker. He was assigned work and he promptly refused because he did not like the duties associated with his job.”

    What kind of premature ejaculate is that, Caswell?

    Can’t you whet our appetite a bit more and point us in the direction of a clearer identikit so we can expose the slimy nepotistic bastard?
    We can read between the lines.

    We wonder what the yard-fowls of the “Douglas” breed have to say about such real public sector reform DLP fatted calf style?

  49. Caswell Franklyn Avatar

    Wait Bushie, time longer than twine.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending