Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Adrian Loveridge - Owner of Peach & Quiet Hotel
Adrian Loveridge – Owner of Peach & Quiet Hotel

Credit where credit is due. I commend the Government for lowering the rate of VAT on ‘hotel accommodation’ and especially extending the same 7.5 per cent to the Direct Tourism Services. This should relate to meaningful savings for our visitors and even, to a lesser degree, help encourage domestic tourism.

From the various social media sites, it is already clear that regular repeat guests will be watching very carefully that all tourism partners benefitting from the reduced tax level, will pass it on. Restaurant dining, car rental, reduced attraction entrance fees, activities like catamaran cruises etc., will all be more affordable and hopefully the overall spend will not fall significantly across the board. The critical element now, is to get this improved value for money into the market places, by every means possible.

Linking particular months with events, especially in the longer leaner periods, at first, makes logical sense, but I think this concept has to be constantly analysed, to ensure any national ‘investment’ is proven to be cost effective. This year with Crop Over is a classic example. Despite all the predictions and post event accolades, July 2013 recorded the lowest number of long stay visitor arrivals across the last 11 years in any same month.

I touched on our tourism performance in September 2012, last week, so today I wanted to cover land based arrivals for the same year in October and November.
Both again, alarmingly recorded their lowest comparable monthly figures during the past decade. November, which was already down 9 per cent or 4,233 persons less when compared with 2011, is especially concerning, as substantial funding was ploughed into the Barbados Food Wine and Rum Festival. You have to ask the question, if projects like this do not substially increase numbers, average spend and stay, what are ‘we’ doing wrong? While all these ‘concepts’ need time to reach potential, considering the festival at that time was in it’s third year, ‘we’ appear to be light-years away from the prophecy that it could ‘be one of the biggest foreign exchange generators for Barbados’.

This year, in addition to this event, there is another Rihanna concert, which hopefully will make a positive difference. But if we are partially relying on regional visitors to guarantee it’s success, let us hope that LIAT has its huge challenges under control by then. Taking an almost brand new aircraft with a book price of US$19 million, out of service, for at least a week, to replace an engine, while at the same time chartering the other ATR to the President of a country that your largest shareholder (Barbados) does not recognise, has to raise questions. The consequence: leaving hundreds of taypaying passengers who guaranteed the loans for the new planes, abandoned across the Caribbean.

Again, in the budget, substantial further funds have been promised to the Barbados Tourism Authority over the next 18 months for debt repayment. marketing and promotion. But with the touted loan not even in place yet, it’s clearly going to take some time to effectively implement, meaningful and responsive programmes, which stand a chance of making a positive difference.

The result appears almost inevitable, that we are going to enter another winter with the prospect of declining arrivals and perhaps just as critically, reduced revenue, profitability and occupancy. This is not painting a doomsday scenario, but an attempt to send a wake-up call to our policymakers and that we can no longer keep on doing things the same way and expect


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

79 responses to “Barbados Government Reduces VAT On Hotel Accommodation”


  1. The idea of ordinary taxpayers subsidising tourists is bordering on the insane. Tourists staying in hotels are given APD discounts, badly managed small hotels will now get NIS backed loans, now a reduction in VAT.
    What else do the small hotel owners want? They already are among the biggest defaulters on VAT and national insurance payments.
    They must pay up or go out of business. There must be no special dispensation for hostel owners.


  2. Well, well, well (not Well Well of BU) I do declare.

    I go to slepp and get up and lo and behold Sinckliar has taken a step to give sensible relief to one of the mainstays (no pun intended) of our economy

    It means the following

    1. He is reading BU as i suspected.
    2. The reasoning of the people/pundits here has prevailed on the previous belligerence of the DLP government
    3. They are cognisant of the patented incompetence of Minister of Tourism Richard Sealy and, barring firing the dimwit and winner of the Award for the Worst CARICOM Minister of Tourism for the last 5 years running, have seen a way to overcome his incompetence WITHOUT FIRING THE DIMWIT and
    4. Darcy Boyce, the accountant who wrote the $500M Budget has gone on vacation for a month and Sinckliar has slipped this one in during his absence.

    @ Pat

    I am glad that my submissions and lack of insulin induced disinformation give you some mirth at those times when you log on

    Here is another titbit that should have you smiling.

    I have it from a good source and authority (the maid at Llaro Court LOL) that PM Fumble has a strange passtime.

    Every morning he turns on the radio to listen to the death announcements, writes down the names and then checks them against the names of his cabinet and breathes a sigh of relief and pumps the air while intoning “Thank you Lord, for a nex day to mollasses dese bajans to deaf, not death, deaf, DEAF BY INTOLERABLE SILENCE!!”

    Apparently she was drawn to this strange diurnal happening when she passed his study and noticed him gripping his conjones with his left hand while writing (the names of the deceased) with his right some time earlier this year after the General Elections.

    Now at first she was wondering if he was doing what the other Minister at *** does do at his computer but she was saying dat right handed men does normally do it wid dem right hand instead of dem left hand unlessing dem ambidextrous. No, no dat doan mean dat udder ting, homosexual, or trisexual, dat mean dat you can use boaf hands equally so, anyways i gine lef de medical details to GP.

    Yes, dere he was, gripping he private parts (wid he lef hand) and writing) rather rapidly wid he right hand den he wud check de names and leggo he parts, every morning!!

    It appear dat he got a vested interest in DEM staying alive until 2018 cause de onliest tings dem dat between he leffing Llaro Court and de Prime Ministership is a deaf among DEM ministers, he own deaf, or a coup.

    Well he seem to have de last one under control wid United States Southern Command, General John Kelly in we maritime zone to de norf west but de udder two is what does got he gripping de family jewels.

    Here is hoping that you is in good spirits again. It is nearly 5 oclock and i going fuh de insulin.

  3. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    Hal, once again massive speculation on your part. Exactly which small hotels owe VAT and NIS? In fact to us, it is completely the opposite. We are currently owed over $20,000 by Government in unpaid but agreed VAT and NIS refunds, some of which has been overdue for 3 years and 9 months (so far).
    I am ALL for publishing a list of defaulters/non-payers. As to the huge windfall you think hotels are getting, we are talking about 1.25 per cent, which of course doesn’t benefit the hotel at all, but its guests. Likewise with the DTS services (restaurants, car rental, activities, attractions etc.,). The benefit goes to the visitor and hopefully makes the product more competitive.
    I am afraid that the MASSIVE reduction of VAT of 1.25 per cent is not going to make up for a 50 per cent increase in land taxes (and more to come), 72 increase in electricity charges, 60 per cent in water etc. WHY do think over 37 hotels have closed in the last 20 years, the highest number in any tourism dependent Caribbean country?


  4. Every single owner of hotel/apartment/villa/condominium/guest house/restaurant and other tourism related services enterprises in Barbados should back the PDC, its associates and its supporters in the great and liberating quest of the majority of people of this country to help bring about a post-TAXATION society for Barbados.

    For, a certain future coalitional government of Barbados, and of which the PDC shall be part of, shall make sure that one of its first orders of business of government is the putting in place of a Commission for the Abolition of Taxation that will engage many stakeholders in the tourism sector, and many more stakeholders in all the other commercial business sectors in the country, on those subjects and matters that are so critical to the realization of the objectives of the liberation of the majority people in this country from the evil scourge of TAXATION.

    Such a Commission for the Abolition of TAXATION shall, among many other things,

    1) Hold town hall meetings in many schools and community centres on this evil dreaded TAXATION system;

    2) Take correspondence from interested parties on this said monstrous wicked TAXATION;

    3) Preside over the production of music, jingles, ads, flyers, etc. on the Abolition of TAXATION, for public dissemination, consumption and absorption via the traditional and modern mass media communications;

    4) Give out pertinent accurate information – historical and otherwise – on the fact that TAXATION is criminal mass theft and admit that governments of the years have been inflicting gross fundamental and inhuman wrongs by illegally forcing the relevant people, businesses, and others over the years to hand over countless portions of what is absolutely theirs – their properties – their remunerations – to government;

    5) Illustrate to the other discussants (contrary to the inanity that is often put out by government and some others in Barbados) that there is absolutely totally no relationship between TAXATION of the remunerations of entities ( TAXED incomes, payments and transfers of the relevant persons do NOT go towards paying government employed doctors, nurses, police, fire officers, towards financing the building of roads, schools, hospitals, etc in Barbados) and the money that is – especially via local financial institutions – constantly accessed used by government workers, businesses, welfare recipients and numerous others in their commercial corporate social relationships with government; and

    6) Engage seriously interested parties on alternatives to TAXATION.

    Such a Commission shall in the final analysis also make recommendations for the necessary people centered developmentalist approaches and strategies that the coalitional government will have to implement and manage in order that the government shall in greater ways have fair proper use of money to get income, payments and transfers from others for their uses of commodities or services or spaces provided by the government, or in order that it shall in greater ways have fair proper uses of money to give income, payments and transfers to others for its uses of commodities or services or spaces provided by them; and approaches and strategies that the government will have to implement and manage to support the government’s/the country’s evolution from TAXATION.

    Indeed, it is such planned positive far-reaching national efforts that persons in tourism and other commercial business sectors in Barbados must seek to invest their time and energy in, rather than continuing in awful subjection – to their perpetual detriment – to this evil wicked TAXATION system.

    PDC


  5. @ Loveridge,

    “As to the huge windfall you think hotels are getting, we are talking about 1.25 per cent, which of course doesn’t benefit the hotel at all, but its guests”

    That seems to be a non syllogism.

    If it “benefits the guests”, does it not, by making the cost of the product less expensive, thereby hopefully increasing throughput, which also benefits the hotelier?

    That is a question that a dyslexic ole man is asking.

    I will however state that this token outreach is five years late in the game but if your national economic plan is led by Darcy Boyce, an accountant who could not run S Y Adam or S.O Pilgrim in Swan/Broad Street, what should we expect??


  6. @Piece

    Whether we agree or not this government like most before it has hitched our hopes and dreams to the tourism wagon:

    http://bajan.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/untitled1.mp3

  7. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    David, a good move and kudos to the PM for his visit to Ocean 2. But, and its a big but, in 25 years we have never seen a serving Minister of Tourism at our hotel and the only time a PM visit our location was after a hurricane damaged a neighbouring property. To be able to capture an understanding of the industry you have view it through difference perspectives.


  8. @ Hal Austin

    While your comment, above, is not inconsistent with our views, we are happy to see that there is some recognition of the limitations of what passes for capitalism within the Bajan context. Surely an industry that has been supported by the Barbadian people, almost from its origins, has to reach a point where it is run like any other capitalist enterprise at some point in time, some would think. However, we have learnt, a long time ago, that capitalists throughout the world falsely pretend to be free marketers etc when the reverse is true. Capitalists everywhere heavily depend on government to protect their markets, sometimes by using the military. For markets were never fair nor free. Every market in this world depends on the Commons for viability. So Loveridge in some since is no different to any other capitalist anywhere else.


  9. @ Adrian
    I am not going to go back through files to raise points that are already in the public domain.
    The key point is that a few cents in VAT discount is not going to encourage people to visit Barbados from Europe or North America.
    The more important point is that ordinary taxpayers are subsidising tourists, their accommodation and meals (B’fast).
    At the same time we have lots of elderly people, and young ones, who are suffering serious food poverty yet have to pay full VAT on basic foodstuff. Why is this?
    Tourism must not be given any special treatment. And, at a time like this, the economy should be diversifying, not shoring up badly managed, privately owned hotels.
    Hotels must stand on their own two feet or shut up shop. That is what the market is all about.


  10. But Hal this is the opportunity cost the government and by extension people have placed on the value of generating forex. And for this reason it is valued as a productive sector. If you talk about dismantling it or more practically being less dependent this is where the debate must be located. To Pacha’s and BT’s point.


  11. @ David

    It is not. Pensioner poverty is the problem. Visitors to Barbados are not depending on saving pennies.
    I do not want to go over the flawed Barbadian consensus about foreign reserves, but the first duty of government is to protect its citizens. And food security is the biggest of those responsibilities in peace time.
    In fact, government should impose a tourist visa of about Bds$30, to fund tourism marketing.
    All the world’s leading tourism destination impose visas conditions and they all increase their visitor numbers every year.
    This is true even of Commonwealth countries, including Australia, New Zealand and Britain.
    Discounting VAT for tourists is a bad mistake.
    What Barbados badly needs is a tier of bed and breakfast and three and two star hotels to encourage travellers from other Caricom nations – not Europe and North America..


  12. @Hal

    It will never happen in Barbados. As recent as yesterday Sir Courtney Blackman advised the government to guard the forex. All of our imminent economists have likewised advise.


  13. Bajan Hoteliers too love a ‘BUT’

  14. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    Hal,
    ‘full VAT on basic foodstuff’
    Now that’s a different story. If the VAT free basket of items is too small, then lobby and change it. Remember, currently our visitors are largely subsidising these items by paying massive bound rates on imported food items, which in some cases are more than 100 per cent.
    You might also recall that HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of Dollars of taxpayers monies was used by Government to almost destroy the private small hotel sector, through systematic predatory pricing. Its is called GEMS (Hotels and Resorts Ltd).
    I have NEVER advocated propping-up poorly managed hotels of any size, but there has to be a level playing field if you want the market to prevail.


  15. Here is how the discussion at the recent breakfast budget meeting went. But why the government only allocate 50 million to tourism compared to $250 million to that Japanese agriculture project. The fact that the government has committed to mobilize funds to start Almond Village, Silver Sands, Marina project etc did not factor. The illustration here is to show a prevailing mindset.

  16. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    CBC News 13th September 2011

    The Minister of Commerce and Trade stated that ‘twenty four items are to be added to the basket of goods by year end’.

    Did this happen and if so, what were the additional items?

    http://www.cbc.bb/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2707:more-in-the-vat-free-basket&catid=36:local-news&Itemid=59


  17. @ David

    For the last five years Sir Courtney has been telling me the problem in Barbados was not structural. Although I have huge respect for him, at least he joins in public debates, he i wrong on foreign exchange and he iw wrong on the structural problem.
    In the mid 1970s, when the central bank was created, foreign reserves was part of conventional thinking. But, since the 1980s, we have a vibrant futures market in commodities and currencies.
    Foreign reserves is part of the old economics.

    @ Adrian

    Gems, Hilton, Four Seasons, Almond Resorts, etc are different. Government has no right in the hotel business. They should get out.


  18. Be aware that the Governor, Sir Courtney, Sir Frank, Charles Skeete are those who are of this view.


  19. Adrian

    You are real fun.

    Paying left hand compliments.


  20. Limited intellectual input and an aversion to using brain power sees the present government as well as the opposition only capable of envisioning dependency (tourism), that is the biggest problem the island has right now politicians who are incapable of conceptualizing original ideas or manifesting abundance for the long suffering taxpayers who continue to lose their shirts to inept politicians. Someone wrote a script for the politicians back in the year 01 (1966) and they intend to follow it to the year 3000………..no ability to try using their own initiative.


  21. It is unprecendant that any sector can ask for so much of the tax payer in this hard economics .a sector who by all means had so much economic ground when the economy was on a boom .a sector who now finds itself in the vice grip of an economic downturn..A sector who has boxed govt into a corner leaving little or no room for compromise as bit by bit they chip away at past measures implemented by govt involving tourism to benefit the overall economy. How much more can the taxpayer bear.


  22. @ac

    Yet your government has delivered.


  23. Cocky Locky …why don’t you go and do the people’s work?


  24. @ Adrian Loveridge; Why was there no ” level playing field” when all the small beach vendors, taxi operators etc were systematically squeezed out of the tourism industry? I did not hear about “level playing field then”.


  25. YES David indeed! but as if a gun has been put to their head. can,t imagine the disgust ERROL would have at this time in a downturn in the economy when everyone should be helping in pulling the wagon the tourism sector is demanding more while the average joe and susan doing the heavy pulling. In as much as i support the govt there is something morally wrong when taxpayes are asked to bear the brunt for one sector while the other sectors wait on line


  26. @ William Skinner
    That is not an argument peoples who are not White can make. But when you hold a lawful captive of a population in the firm grip of an evil system questions like this need for equity and fairness are to be encouraged by the predators. Equity and fairness in any other context can never be awarded – not even a hearing.


  27. This is the time for the broad masses and middle classes of people of this country to permanently remove the DLP and BLP from the governmental landscape of this country.

    It is they that are primarily responsible for the current political material financial depressionary conditions affecting the country.

    It is their very backward and inept political economic financial TAXATION policies over the years and the adverse effects of those that have brought about these prevailing conditions.

    It is clear that for the country to be rescued from out of these pits of hell that DLP/BLP governments have been putting us in, that there must be a new dispensation of disciplined people-centered coalition building nationalist political sociological practitioners from newer parties that must come to the fore of the governmental politics in this country.

    So, Remove the Damned DLP and the Blasted BLP!!

    PDC


  28. Cash-strapped tourists from destinations also undergoing economic crises will seek out a new and cheaper place to go for their holiday if they can still afford one, that is. The idea of making them pay extra just to come to Barbados is mad. Why would they when they can go elsewhere in the Caribbean for much less? Barbados was famous for being a rip-off already anyway, even before the downturn.
    Sure, the cost of utilities is rising here but hello wake up, also all over the developed world. It’s no use trying to pass those costs on to tourists because they just will not come BECAUSE THEY CANNOT AFFORD BARBADOS for their holiday.
    Everyone is tightening their belts and trimming down excess spending
    The folly of being totally dependent upon tourism as an income is now becoming ever more apparent. Too late to worry about that now but please, taxing tourists will only deter them from coming at all so it is shoot- yourself-in-the foot time for whoever thought of that brilliant idea.
    Things are not going to go back to the way they were for a very long time, if ever. Bajans have to face the fact that they do not live in a rich country. What is the point of putting up prices when there is nobody there to buy things?

  29. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    It’s always a shame when certain people are selective about what they read in my column. It isn’t ONLY visitors who will benefit from the reduction in VAT. It will also make it more affordable for residents to eat in our restaurants, rent cars, visit activities and attractions etc. After WE launched the re-DISCOVER initiative following the tragic events of 911, some 1,592 diners visited Carambola Restaurant over a three month. Most of those were Barbadians. When the owner asked why people had booked, the answer was almost always ‘you have made it more affordable’.
    It kept the restaurant open and staff employed.
    And please don’t tell me local people do not rent cars. You only have to ask one of the larger rental companies.


  30. Pachamama | August 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM |

    @ William Skinner
    That is not an argument peoples who are not White can make. But when you hold a lawful captive of a population in the firm grip of an evil system questions like this need for equity and fairness are to be encouraged by the predators. Equity and fairness in any other context can never be awarded – not even a hearing.

    ___________________________________

    Black people have more rights than anyone else on the island to make that argument, it is their money (tax dollars) in the millions consistently being used for decades without any real input from the politicians other than releasing taxpayers funds to whomsoever wants the money and without any consciousness of the consequences when tourism fails completely. As usual the politicians have no Plan B.


  31. Here we are talkng about cut in vat on the premise that it would be an incentive for tourist spending.however ac is reluctant to endorse such proposal at this time giving the fact that even those countries that have had increases in tourist it seems only to be marginal to average which means in such case the dividends expected would be far less and the govt would have given up much in return for nothing driving forex further down and catapulting the deficit as well.


  32. @ac

    Are you aware that Barbados is a high cost destination.


  33. So here we have barbados and its/alignment to other countries on which we are dependant for tourist.. Barbados has always been a high end tourist destination. However tourist kept coming and why? Because those source markets were thriving which meant that tourist coming had the wherwithall to spend. However the reverse is true now because of the downturn by reducing the vat would not guarante an increase in tourist or more spending. and if that is the case which is more likely than not the economy lose


  34. If he scnario i presented is played iout my question to who then tAkes up the slack. i know the tiurist industry would balked if govt suggest that sucha plan was not workable and would have to raise the vat again . Therfore the one and only solution would be having to ask the taxpayer for another helping hand cause the Hoteliers could not give two fu..ks about the small guy.


  35. @ David

    Without being arrogant, every day I work with some of the best known economists and policymakers in the English-speaking world. None of those you mentioned, though all respectable, is intimidating.
    The simple point is that excess foreign reserves is bad management of the macro-economy; and, since the Second World War, Barbados has been badly in need of structural change.
    This is now recognised by the minister of finance in his recent Budget speech.
    If Sir Frank, Sir Courtney, Governor Worrell and Charles Skeete are all in favour of warehousing lots of foreign reserves and borrowing, piling up debt to pay civil servants, repair roads, underwrite small hotel owners’ debt, etc, then they are all wrong.
    If your claim is true, then I know some of the private emails I get say otherwise.
    Ordinary people are being misled We need to debate these things in our media.
    Where are our academics?


  36. Where is the Plan B……….beating the dead (tourism) to death is not a Plan B, some are still living in an illusion that there will be some kinda recovery, where? when? how? those with all the talk are not in control of the world’s finances and will never be, they are only tiny sprats in a big pond, can hardly see them with a microscope, their input means tiddly squat in the grand scheme of things unless they have innovative ideas to move away from dependency (tourism).


  37. Something is puzzling me, how is it that DASS is ok with the budgetary proposals as they relate to the Tourism Industry and ADRIAN LOVERIDGE IS NOT?

    Am I to take it that ADRIAN LOVERIDGE is wiser than DASS? Or is this a case of LOVERIDGE’s way or the highway?

    Someone enlighten my darkness!


  38. @ Well Well

    We need to diversify our economy. We cannot continue to depend on tourism.
    Instead of having an open debate, I am now told the central bank (read government) has carried out a coup on the Barbados Economic Society.. So, no more critiques of government policy.
    This one-dimensionality is what we used to call brain washing.


  39. @ David

    This is the kind of rassho*e that makes us cuss. This fuck*nh idiot that you have here regurgitation trite. These so-called ‘well-known economists and policymakers’ that he like to pretend he can hobnob with, have they taken any responsibility for the non-sense they sold to us? David you will remember the Y2K consulting fiasco, many before and after. Yet this cunt*ole comes here and talks about respectable economists and policymakers. We don’t care who they are for they must be a constellation of criminals working against working people all over the world. How many of these idiots have come out and beg forgiveness for the ignorance they have injected into the body politic? This nonsense about ‘best known economist and policymakers’ is bullshi*. In the first place economics is not a science and in any event none of these narcissists know more about economics than our grandmother, who never went to school. These people that Hal Austin sycophantically looks up to are serial criminals looking to make a living by ripping off the peoples of the world for their masters, the leading corporations. Let Austin name one of these idiots, any one of them, and within minutes we shall destroy him or her. We don’t like violence as a rule but in this case the people he refers to and he, himself, should have his shoulders sent to look for his head.


  40. @ David
    This idiot Hal Austin is not interested in any debate, per se. What he wants is to be seen as singing from a certain hymnal. He is so locked into a perverse neo-feudalism it seems almost a religion, to him. He is more a neo-conservative than any other seen by us, though he seems not to recognize the ignorance he speaks. This is not about helping ordinary people. This is about the whole sale transfer of a particular ideology from where he is, to Bridgetown. And he is not alone. He is aided by nincompoops like Courtney Blackman, Frank Alleyne and others who have failed to build on an economy model as first articulated by a of our thinkers Beckford, Demas and other Caribbean leaders.


  41. @Hal

    Are you trivializing the fact that Dr. Worrel has done his tour of duty with an international agency which when combined with local knowledge puts him in a good position don’t you think? Our Economists went to the same universities etc.


  42. Hal……..they are also trying to cover up a lot of scams, they have to use subtle dictatorial tactics to pull that off….they will not want to hurt their brains with diversification, but that will ultimately be their downfall, i will sit in North America and watch it unfold….karma is indeed a bitch.

  43. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ac | August 26, 2013 at 11:52 AM |
    “…increases in tourist it seems only to be marginal to average which means in such case the dividends expected would be far less and the govt would have given up much in return for nothing driving forex further down and catapulting the deficit as well.”

    You ability to confound knows no bounds. What kind of specious reasoning is that?
    Could you tell us what would the government be giving up by reducing the VAT applicable to goods and services sold to tourists by providers in the Hotel sector?

    Have you ever heard of the phrase ‘killing the goose that lays the golden egg’ or ‘pricing yourself out of the market’ (or more aptly, in your case, ‘cutting off your nose to spite your face’)?
    The government would earn NO tax revenues if visitors refuse to find Barbados an affordably attractive destination. It is better to lower taxes (while at the same time dealing with the other irritating issues like harassment, lack of sufficient attractions and a degenerating environment) with the hope of attracting more spend from visitors than to maintain a tax regime that only acts as a disincentive like having to pay a service charge when the service is woefully lousy and insultingly rude.

    It is precisely because of the very high local input costs including taxes that the tourists find Barbados expensive without a commensurate return of value for money when compared to other regional destinations. The Barbados market can only charge the kind of prices prevailing in the current market and still remain attractively competitive if it is prepared to offer value for money demanded from the visitors.

    The state of the hotel plant (excluding upscale properties like Sandy Lane which must by its own survival instinct offer top of the line facilities and service) and the general environment the average visitor is exposed to do not justify the kind of prices, including taxes, found on average throughout the industry. Even the Oistins Bay Gardens- a potential cash cow for the local economy- is getting in on the act of trying to rip off the tourists by exorbitantly increasing prices and allowing the facility to fall below standard due to poor or little maintenance and upgrade and keeping away the pimps and riff-raff from harassing the “foreign looking” patrons.

    What should be of concerned to the government is whether the revised tax regime with lowered output tax would put further pressure on its cash flow capacity to refund in a more timely manner the higher input tax to the hoteliers and other providers of services to tourists.
    Sorry, ac, if you are unable to comprehend or follow what is implied here. In other words, would we see more of what Adrian Loveridge is subjected to or would government be more supportive to the sector and obey the law?


  44. @Hal

    Bear in mind it is the economist who has put the world in the financial state it finds itself. In the post meltdown it has given rise to behavioral economic.


  45. Economists do not understand business as it relates to economics, the idiot who created the discipline did not realize it should have been merged into the business management discipline (BA, MA, MBA), some people are now coming to that realization, albeit way too late, politicians who are economists and are not business oriented will only succeed in acquiring huge debts when the bottom falls out as everyone is now witnessing worldwide. Well lawyers are not business people anyway so with 30 are more in parliament it is a lose lose situation for Barbados’ economy.


  46. @ David
    I am not trivialising anyone. The first thing I sdaid was that I respect them all, but am not intellectually intimidated by them or their reputations.
    My point is brief is that in 2007/8 the global economy collapsed. No one saw that coming.
    Yet, in most of our higher educational institutions the same paradigms of economics is taught.
    Can you imagine a plane crashing and the same theories of aeronautical engineering being taught. We have just had a helicopter crash in Scotland and all that brand of helicopter has been withdrawn from service.
    Paul Krugman has made this point in the NY Times and Gregory Mankiw has also made a similar point.
    Neoclassical economics has failed; those professors who taught that paradigm prior to 2007/8 must explain themselves.
    Neoclassical economics is still taught as it was during the early 20th century by Alfred Marshall and his followers (see his Principles of Economics).
    Equally, the central bankers who implemented policies based on neoclassical economics must explain what changes they have made to policy since the collapse of Anglo-Saxon capitalism. They have not.
    At the root of this paradigm, trade theory, is the accumulation of foreign reserves.
    Foreign reserves are built up to hedge against external shocks: what external shock has Barbados had since the end of the Second World War when the Cornwallis was torpedoed in Carlise Bay?
    The issue with financial regulation is that it is not pure economics, nor pure law, nor pure politics: it is a hybrid. So, an outstanding economist like Ben Bernanke or Mervyn King (former mats at MIT)( do not necessarily have all the answer.
    We need a new paradigm in Barbados and the ,inward-looking debate among the power elite, and the idiotic ideas from the frustrated and angry are not helping educate the general public.
    Because of the immediacy of the macro-economic issues, we talk about central banking, but there are very pressing issues to be debated, such as reforming our company legislation to give workers and other stakeholders a right to sit on the board.
    In general, we need to reconceptualise the way we approach policymaking, not hide behind intellectual insularity.
    In terms of excessive foreign reserves, we need to approach this by looking at theory, then empirical analysis, then action.


  47. @Hal

    Understand that we need a new path BUT the current state which Barbados is currently grappling is that there is rapidly declining forex in reserve.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading