est. 2007

Barbados Underground

Bringing News and Opinions to the People

The Violet Beckles Affair, Separating Fact From Fiction Part III

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

In the news recently Barbadians learned about a Court battle over the sale of The Farm Plantation. In 2005 a Court approved the sale of the plantation to Timothy Walsh of Nature’s Produce for $1.5 million. And in a recent court order the 135 acre property was approved to be sold to building magnate Bjorn Bjerkhamn for $1.35 million.

The treasure which has caused wars to be fought continues. On BU “Plantation Deeds” continues his online war to expose a matter which he believes is not being given enough airplay by the establishment. Here are some more documents which includes The Farm plantation and the Urban Development Commission (UDC).

Yes we know, BU is not a court of law BUT an online medium which allows the ordinary to give vent to concerns.

Related Links:

Here are the links to the images in the Slide Show:

UDC Letter

Plantation Owners 1630-1846 (4)

Plantation Owners 1630-1846 (3)

Plantation Owners 1630-1846 (2)

Plantation Owners 1630-1846 (1)

Plantation Owners 1630-1846

Front page news – 6

Front page news – 5

Front page – 4

Front page news – 3

Front page news – 2

UDC Mess

A Receipt with a local lawyer’s stamp affixed

Well Gap Conveyance (a)

Well Gap Conveyance (b)

Well Gap Conveyance (c)

Bertram Springer

Statement of Facts

BH Search (1)

BH Search (2)

133 responses to “The Violet Beckles Affair, Separating Fact From Fiction Part III”

  1. Enuff Avatar
    Enuff

    David what do the latest documents prove?

  2. Enuff Avatar
    Enuff

    You should have redacted the tenants’ names.

  3. St George's Dragon Avatar
    St George’s Dragon

    I have been following this with interest but am getting increasingly confused.
    Deeds has not strung together any kind of cogent story; the documents don’t seem to prove anything – they are just produced at random.
    I have seen no case made out that shows me (let alone a Court of Law) that there is any substance behind this at all. It is not helped by comments from Deeds like the one about 200 – 300 plantations being owned.
    Sorry – for me, unless something more conclusive comes out, I have to conclude while there may be some basis of land pwnership behind this, the conspiracy theory is a fiction.

  4. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Some of the lots at Well Gap were stolen by persons who went to court and perjured themselves by claiming that they were entitled to claim title because they were in undisputed possession of the land for ten or more years. Violet was unaware of the matters before the court and therefore did not object. I still believe that these properties could be recovered because the new owners obtained title to the land by perpetrating a fraud on the court. Unfortunately, some lawyers were active and willing participants in this fraud and we know Barbados, their fellow attorneys and the courts will close ranks to protect them.

  5. Hants Avatar
    Hants

    Why don’t the BU Lawyers (Jeff,Legalese and Amused ) focus on Caswell’s assertions?

    A lot of good could come out of this” story.”

    The legal language alone could have created problems for Violet Beckles and her heirs as it does for us laymen.

  6. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS

    Enuff@ Let us say that the letter from the UDC Lawyer made up 2 names that we did not see at that time ,
    We ask the lawyer to produce the deed in the letter and it can not be found now where at all even the land registry not Archives ,See if you can find that name person , we cant even find it at birth records.The lawyer never reply.

    As you all were told before Sir Ham was to Ascent the Plantation deeds, He did not get the other land and house deeds, So we still have them , We also did not give all what we had to the police and most removed from records??

    The letter proves that they made up a letter to get paid for the lots , that money was paid out to a Big law Firm.No one ever though that , THAT real deed was still around from under Beatrice Henrys BED
    UCC1-207

  7. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS

    St George’s Dragon @Thank you for following this True Life our-story.
    I am sorry this may hurt many heads a lot more than Mine ,
    After leaving Barbados in 1970 , Lived in Guyana& Suriname and the US of A and to come back in 2003 , To hear a cry for help , to get on a plane and come to see this Queen ,, Who just BURN my brain.
    Then to sit at her table for more than 3weeks looking at papers , from 9 am to after midnight, Then to walk from King Street to Rockely
    Then to learn Barbados from the Plantation down , not LOT nor Plot,
    Had to study how Barbados looked when Beatrice Jemmott was born 1892 till the time she bought her first plantations in 1926 , Ventnor , Sixmans, Allyendale, and so on , ,Then to buy My first in car Barbados to drive her to see them All ,Using the Plantation Deeds as a road map.. Yes it will burn your head,
    I will say it took a year to sink in , until i had a problem like most of you had , and when i had a dream i woke up and said to my self,
    WORDs LIE , PEOPLE LIE , NUMBERs DONT LIE , SO AS THEY SAY IN THE CORP ,, BY THE NUMBERS PEOPLE , By the numbers.
    I WOKE UP AT 4: AM AND LOOKED AT THE NUMBERS AND DAM SURE THEY DID NOT LIE AND SHOW ME THE PATH.

    The next time my head hurt , Beatrice Henry came to me in a Dream and standing in grass said to me while waving her right hand said ,
    All the Land is Mine, all the Land is mine,
    It took near 2 years at the different level of growth, that is was not grass but young sugar cane,

  8. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS

    Caswell Franklyn @ 100% agreed we found the same , fraud upon the court.
    Yes. many lawyers went along with this Fraud to make fees and the land surveyors worked with the lawyers to make the deal complete, They place the name of the person on the surveyors report that the name of the check will be written in, With friends at the bank then cashed the checks out the govt accounts,

  9. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS

    You all wanted FOI Act or law , well this is it , clear , We not blocking now names , if BU want to block but that is what freedom means , Like some not ready for free still looking for slave and slavery, Some may
    not be able to handle truth for lies work so well for them at the cost of others.The names dont mean they did any thing wrong for many of the name were also de-Frauded , for the $2.50 cent per square foot they paid went to the wrong persons acting as a land owner and no deed,

  10. Checkit-Out Avatar
    Checkit-Out

    Deeds;
    With each new release of documents, your case, imho, takes on a greater degree of believability although some things are still not clear. On seeing the pictures of Violet Beckles I realized that I recognized her face as someone I’d seen before, possibly at the General Hospital where I worked for a year after leaving HC (Brumley for Legalese). The stories in the Nation therefore partially filled a gap in my recognition of a real person whose inheritance was probably stolen through the collusion of several actors. Your description of driving Beatrice Henry around to see her property all around barbados also struck a chord but It would be nice to get some fuller historical vignettes of her as the rich high flyer of a half century ago but who is practically unknown now. That is possibly one of the greatest unwonted consequences of the numerous bites that possibly claimed all her properties.

    It would be a pity if this matter becomes swept under the carpet and dies a natural death. Following David’s suggestion that the BU Lawyer posters should consider using Caswell’s BU inputs on this matter as a starting point for a more rigorous assessment of the legal viability of your claims on BU , I’m wondering if you ever considered contracting say, Caswell, to put together a “case” for you that might have a fair chance of being considered seriously by some outlier member(s) of the legal fraternity. I think they are a few young ones who who could be trusted and who might see the case as a vehicle for advancing their careers.

    Once again it might be useful if someone in the young group of lawyers that we were told on BU had taken up the case and then abandoned it because of its complexity, could themselves tell the BU family exactly why they abandoned it. I wonder if the Lawyer (Was it Legalese?) who made that disclosure could go one step further and ask one of the group to summarize their reasons for quitting on BU. That should give us some untrammeled insight into the likely legal outcomes of this campaign.

  11. David Avatar
    David

    @Checkit-out

    Good last comment.

    @Deeds

    Can you advise who the young lawyers were who assisted?

    @Caswell

    Are you in a position to contact Deeds and for a fee draft a brief which strings the key issues?

    @enuff

    BU is not a court. We are allowing a citizen to vent an issue and let the chips fall where ever.

  12. Sunshine Sunny Shine Avatar
    Sunshine Sunny Shine

    The young lawyers has no choice to back down not because of any complexity. Complexities can be unraveled. It is my belief that the young lawyers where shown the road to their success and after careful manipulation and intimidation by their superiors to see the trouble that would brew for them on that road they decided to back off.

  13. Amused Avatar
    Amused

    @Checkit-Out | December 23, 2012 at 12:32 AM | The problem is, as always, time. If Casewell can put together a brief, all well and good. For my taste, however, there is still far too much information missing. This entails not one, but several, title searches, some going back over a century – each one of those will require a LOT of man hours. And at the end of the day, they may not prove anything. Therefore, if I were Deeds, I would find a good searches clerk – and there are several in Barbados – and pay them to conduct the necessary searches at the Archives and the Land Registry. I would then order certified copies of the relevant documents (which he is going to have to do anyway if this matter is to come before the courts). In the timeframes that Deeds is discussing, let me assure you that there is no possibility of the documents at the Archoves going missing. So, if they are not recorded there, it means that they were never recorded – and if they were never recorded, then they have either been misplaced and there is nothing further to be done – OR they never existed.

    I do not have enough to go on from what has been posted here and in previous blogs, to form any firm opinion. There is the appearance of there being something here, but insufficient hard evidence at this stage.

  14. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ Check it out .
    It was not the ” complexity ” of the case that turned off the group of young eager lawyers ; it was really the inadequacy of the evidence , documentary and otherwise which showed them no way forward in the ungodly jumble . Complexity is no barrier to the unraveling of legal issues . A very real example of what they encountered is here presented by the ” documents ” produced on this blog ; these documents provide nothing but confusion . Our system of title searching allows a search to be done on any parcel of land in Barbados . We now need to go back no more than twenty years to establish a root of title ; not so long ago the period was SEVENTY years . There is therefore adequate facility for making legal sense of any land matter if AUTHENTIC documentary evidence is produced . My own basic knowledge of conveyancing causes me to treat the documents displayed
    by this Plantation deeds person with the greatest level of incredulity . It is however clear that your own knowledge of conveyancing causes you to have a wholly different opinion . Take comfort ; that is the nature of the law .

  15. David Avatar
    David

    @legalese

    BU will trust Caswell’s prelim investigation and instinct on this one.

    According to you Deeds and before him Violet Beckles fabricated this mess?

  16. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ David
    Whoever ” fabricated this mess ” is not the issue . I am more concerned about the outlandish claims being made by the Deeds person that may only confuse this matter more . For example , in answer to a very logical observation by ANON about an EARLIER document bearing reference to a LATER statute and the irregularity of the drawn and prepared stamp at that time , Deeds replies that that happened WHEN THE DEED WAS REDONE. Now that is an explanation that can make no legal sense ; DEEDS ARE NOT REDONE . A deed may be replaced if the original became lost or destroyed . If land changes ownership A NEW DEED IS DRAWN TO REFLECT THE NEW TRANSACTION LEADING TO THE TRANSFER . If you wish this blog to be credible you must allow claims like this to be held up to logical scrutiny ; in the absence of that kind of assessment , the blog would degenerate into a medium for slander and the destruction of our institutions . All I have been trying to do is to raise some issues which go to the heart of this incredible tale in an attempt to rid the discussion of that kind of sentiment , based on someone’s acquaintance of Violet Beckles when she was a patient in hospital etc , which seems to have influenced the thinking of persons like CHECK IT OUT .

  17. David Avatar
    David

    @Legalese

    Deeds is not a lawyer and obviously does not have all the answers. It is why he is reaching out via this citizens medium to make his concerns known. Some of us are prepared to work with him to separate fact from fiction. It seems you are willing to shoot down all of his argument on the basis of its ‘incredulity’.

    Earlier question stands, who are the young lawyers who tried to help out on this matter?

  18. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ David
    Caswell’s preliminary investigation has caused him to treat most of what the Deeds person alleges with a pinch of salt . Go back to his earliest postings and you will see that he said as much . He said too that his researches lead to the discovery of SEVENTEEN PARCELS of land ; there is nothing unusual in finding persons of modest means with that kind of legacy . A search in the many villages would support that view . Start with the wider Black Rock area and you will see what I am talking about . The larger level of disbelief surrounds the claim about 200 to 300 plantations etc .

  19. Bush Tea Avatar
    Bush Tea

    Nothing convinces Bushie more of the authenticity of Deeds’ case, than the petty interventions of the normally sane legal minds on this blog.
    Sunny Sunshine is obviously right.
    NO YOUNG LAWYER IN BARBADOS CAN MARK FAT WITH THIS CASE….they are just a bunch of trainee donkey lickers.

    What we have here is a case of massive whole scale FRAUD at the highest levels of our society.(Where is Bushie’s National Supervisory Committee with Caswell when we need it….?)

    Amusing’s prescription is truly amusing. Taking this matter to court in Barbados will be synonymous with praying to the Devil for deliverance from Hell. As Deeds correctly surmises, the thieving lawyers who defrauded Violet Beckles are now QCs, Senior Counsel, Sirs, AND JUDGES……and even higher….

    In the SAME vein in which the BU lawyers raise minor technical doubts to attempt to dismiss the case, you CAN BET that any Bajan Court will likewise – after many years and MANY HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DEED’S DOLLARS ARE WASTED, ‘decide’ that in its opinion “some evidence is unconvincing”…..and dismiss Deeds’ claims.
    That is their idea of JUSTICE.

    Deeds has the right approach.
    – PUBLISH THE FACTS THROUGHOUT BARBADOS AND THE WORLD

    – CALL NAMES. If David refuses to publish them, then start your OWN BLOG too. (What became of FOI David?)

    – PICK ONE OBVIOUS CLAIMED PROPERTY with full documentation and pursue THAT ONE legally initially.

    Sue one of the thieving lawyers for malpractice just to keep the case in public view. (Such a suit could only succeed in a just society)

    ….whatever you do, DO NOT LET ANY MORE OF YOUR DOCUMENTS OUT OF YOUR CONTROL….

  20. David Avatar
    David

    @legalese

    Whether the stake is 200-300 plantations or 17 parcels of land is does not change the overarching issue; dymystifying an issue.

  21. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ David .
    If you go back to your earlier postings you will see that mention was made of a group of lawyers lead by Dr Blackman that gained coverage in the Nation newspaper . I am not shooting down anything . I take issue with the fact that a greater level of debate is taking place on what is obviously FICTION rather than any concerted effort being made to use the FACT as a means of assisting this Deeds person . Because of this he has been allowed to become more and more preposterous in his claims .

  22. Kiki Avatar
    Kiki

    A Court Application should be filed in to ensure that Evidence is reviewed and not ignored. The Court will decide if it has any merit. If you reserve the right to submit further evidence it can be collected and submitted while the case is in progress. Lawyers would charge large to produce Bundles for Court, which David is doing free, so Lawyers will not be needed for their extortionate cut.

  23. David Avatar
    David

    @legalese

    So far you have not given us the names of the young lawyers. By Dr. Blackman do you mean Don Blackman?

    Let us accept your concern that Deeds has been provoked to make preposterous claims. Given your knowledge of the law what are the discrete steps you can advise Deeds to take or have you dismissed him entirely?

  24. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ David
    Are you for one moment suggesting that there is no difference between a debate surrounding 200 to 300 PLANTATIONS and one surrounding SEVENTEEN PARCELS OF LAND in Barbados ? please clarify ; I am somewhat flummoxed .

  25. David Avatar
    David

    Thanks Kiki, what the lawyers who have contributed so far have ignored is that there is activity which feeds the discovery process. It is here that Deeds needs help instead we have our legal eagles attacking the guy as if he were on the damn witness stand.

  26. David Avatar
    David

    @legalese

    The point which you have conveniently tried to go pedantic on is that the issue here for BU is whether Violet Beckles was taken to the cleaners by the ‘system’. The quantum is secondary at this point.

  27. Bush Tea Avatar
    Bush Tea

    What is a plantation?
    One man’s “lot” is another man’s “plantation”. Who says that a plantation must be 500 acres? Or 500 square miles as in Brazil? Or maybe 5000 square feet as in Violet Beckles’ mind…..?

  28. ac Avatar
    ac

    there is sufficient evedience to show that she was taken to the cleaners. “starting with the missing or stolen deeds. a point of clarity which has remained fixated in my mind as a starting point of where a snowball effect took place which lead to confusion and presented a challenge for Deeds. some what to a chain having a missing link.

  29. David Avatar
    David

    @Amused

    Reference to your earlier point about searching records at the Archives.

    Deeds made the earlier point that records have gone missing and he produced the references to show (is this not so Deeds?).

    If there are references it means there were documents. Let us have a look!

  30. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ David
    There is nothing so far published by Deeds that would allow me to give him legal advice . And given his obvious penchant for name calling and personal vilification I would be rather chary in offering advice to such a person . Have you not been concerned by the widescale scurrilous attacks that have been made on people BY NAME WITHOUT SUPPORTING PROOF ?

  31. David Avatar
    David

    @legalese

    Can you point to those comments you are concerned about? Most of the earlier comments by Deeds were deleted before BU started the 3-part series running. Since we have been monitoring Deeds to make sure he is remains focused on the message.

    Here is a question for you. What was the role of Richard Byer in the role of rent collector?

  32. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ David
    What do you mean by ” records gone missing ” ? If you are speaking of the official Government Archives , that statement does not make sense . The Archive Department makes it possible to trace documents and they are recorded as historical records ; it is not like going into a library and not being able to find a text because it has gone missing for whatever reason . Archival science is too complex an area to be understood by the person that Deeds presents himself to be . That is why i keep making the point that emotionalism , slander and ignorance must not be allowed the currency that it is receiving in this matter .

  33. David Avatar
    David

    @legalese

    To your last point BU will allow Deeds to respond.

    @Deeds

    Have you physically presented yourself at the Archives and experienced that files previously viewed by you subsequently went missing? If so what are the references.

  34. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ David
    Get serious David ! The question about Richard Byer cannot be a question for me . Who / what do you perceive me to be ? If you would wish to drag me into the same level of discussion that i am complaining about I will simply say goodbye to you .

  35. David Avatar
    David

    @legalese

    You go hostile because of an innocent question about the receipt above which bears Richard Byer’s stamp?

  36. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ David
    ” Hostile ” is not correct . Richard Byer may best give you the answer you want ; I CANNOT . That is not a question for me . GET SERIOUS !

  37. Bush Tea Avatar
    Bush Tea

    ….begs the question then ….what is the interest of legalese?

    The claim is that a set of documents were presented to a well known lawyer whose services were sought in handling the affairs of an ordinary but land rich citizen.
    -The lawyer later reported the papers “missing” and some of the land subsequently ended in in strange hands.
    -Strange people received money for the sale of said lands
    -The official documents have been “adjusted” or are missing
    -The named lawyer has had his name “out there” now for YEARS…
    Has he clarified his position? Cleared his name? Offered an explanation?
    -Other Legal persons have been named…..have they clarified/explained?
    -Known lawyers’ names are on documents …has anyone explained?
    -Caswell attests that something is amiss…..does ANYONE doubt Caswell’s ability to confirm such?

    But anonymous “legal lights” are calling this a “non issue”!!!??
    WHAT THE HELL! Not ALL Bajans are jackasses!

  38. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    David, Legalese, Bushie et al

    I do not know how to contact Deeds, however, I think that he should start small by trying to recover the piece of land that the Chief Marshal sold in error or in incompetence.

    Violet was not a patient: she worked as a maid at the QEH for many years.

    I am not trying to be mean, but Violet could not fabricate a shopping list: there is no way on this earth that she could fabricate a deed.

    I am not saying that there were only 17 parcels. I had other work to do and I thought that I had enough information to satisfy the Attorney General that Violet had a credible case, and the AG would then institute an investigation: she never did.

  39. ac Avatar
    ac

    then again the matter of “the missing or stolen deeds” should be enough to raised a “red flag” in the anyone minds it doesn’t take a legalises opinion to figure that out.

  40. David Avatar
    David

    @Caswell

    Thanks for your constructive intervention.

    It seems that the thesis of another blog is why did former Attorney General Mia Mottley not commission an investigation arising from your report.

  41. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS

    Legalese@ what you are saying about how to find and search is right? But not real in the land of fraud.when you reach you will see the rules are not being followed

    .@ Legalese@We now need to go back no more than twenty years to establish a root of title ; not so long ago the period was SEVENTY years.Legalese

    NOW think why? If you go back 70 years if there you will find Beatrice Henry. or a big gap between the land registry and the Archives.
    so they made it 20 years for the have been taking from the Estate for over 24 years, What year did the 20 rule came in to effect?
    So behind 20 years you will find NOTHING and make your new deed and make your fees.This a called Fraud and good title , what you need to get is CLEAR TITLE.
    The problem is that most lawyers are lazy and look for the easy way out and to make a US DOLLAR.
    Legalese@ you have a deed ? you may own land,? Look back 70 years and let BU know if you have a good title or a clear title. You maybe lucky not to be on any of her lands , I wish you luck.FIND the Plantation deed for where you live , if you need help with the owner i will give them to you on BU, For i can give more on Plantation info than your govt.
    Welcome to the Land of the Moors

  42. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS

    Caswell Franklyn@ Deeds info for all who cares and want to know and see.

    moorishcourt@gmail.com

  43. Enuff Avatar
    Enuff

    I hope BU notes that the UDC letter (a) was addressed to M. M. Talma and explicitly states that “subsidies were paid to Messrs Carrington & Sealy attorneys-at-law, who acted on the behalf of the purchasers….”, which confirms what I have been saying all along that UDC does not sell land. With this information should Plantation Deeds not be able to have a title search done at the Registry to find out who was the Vendor?

  44. Enuff Avatar
    Enuff

    “Enuff@ Let us say that the letter from the UDC Lawyer made up 2 names that we did not see at that time”

    Did you check to see who now lives on the identified lots? It is not like the land is mobile. Again if research was done, BU and Deeds would know that the names of tenants are ascertained and confirmed by conducting a survey of the tenantry so I find it hard to believe that the attorney could have sent fabricated names to UDC when they would have supplied him with the names in the first place.

  45. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS

    David@ YES We went all places and even face to face with Mr. Williams the Chief Archivist at the Archives in Black Rock. After we arrived there with a suit case of 50 pounds of papers(DEEDS) .

    Mr Williams as i was told by him to be there at that time for 25 years and counting,So who better to ask about the Plantation Deeds,Instead Mr. Williams ran out the door and said he know he got his deed.
    The same papers that the Fraud Squad saw and copied ,All the places the AG told us to go to check we had done before going to the AG.in 2009 and 2010.
    Remember also went to the AG MIA so that is 3 AGs and NOTHING was done?
    What is the Duty of the AG in Barbados ?, Is it to get an extra check? and to block the laws in favor of lawyers like the BAR Disciplinary Committee.With Keith Simmons and David Simmons on TOP.
    Why you think PM David move him, he knew and saw Violets Papers when he was Also the AG for Barbados ,, TOTAL NUMBER OF AGs = 4.

  46. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS

    Kiki @ last count of lawyers who was on this case is at 63. many came back with Plantation deeds and the amounts of the land at time was reduced from 80 acres to 20 acres but the land surveyor said the papers he have show it was really 90 acres.
    We had many stack of deeds from the different lawyers looking to take off what they needed for their private use over the years.
    Land registry books were re written and now many things on different pages and the name of Beatrice Henry Missing,
    Print outs in 1980 is a lot different in 2011 and the dead persons did not sell anything when already dead.
    To change His-story from Our-Story to make gains.
    See what the laws are before Beatrice Died and how and why were the laws changed after she died , Check the time lime.
    Yes 70 years as one said to search and to look back and deeds took a long time for they made it 20 years,
    To cut out , Beatrice.

    No new deeds can be made with a 70 year search. this is why deeds were held up in the courts, and the lawyers prevented from selling what is not clear title. The NHC lawyer was moved to the Land Registry WHY? After an AUDIT by PM DAVID. More Info that will come out on the NHC.

    Its UDC time in the light, read the newspaper headings and try to remember.WHY PM David removed Trotman and Edghill from the UDC and then the replacement Lavine was also removed a years later after his one year agreement was ended.
    Yes, we had a meeting with the new head Lavine with Richard Byer. Richard Byer told me in front of 6 others and who heard him in the hall ways, To “get the F**k out his Office and Dont F**King come back in a LOUD voice in 2009.

    I sent the info to the PM David. Did Richard Byer take checks from UDC? Did Richard Byer take Monies when working in the HOUSE? Was it 30,000?

  47. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926-2012 AND SEE MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS

    BU , readers PM David did a FORENSIC AUDIT of the UDC , where is the report?
    FORENSIC AUDIT was done also of the NHC, where is the report?
    When they look they found enough to remove the heads of the departments..
    The next place to AUDIT is the LAND REGISTRY . AND THE ARCHIVES.
    Remember the lawyer for the NHC and now at the land registry is Samantha Cummings of both the NHC and the land registry ,
    NHC was taking Violet Land behind her back just by signing papers.To transfer land to the Crown and then to Iona Marshall et al of New Jersey. USA, then back to the Crown and paying Iona Marshall et al, and not paying Violet Beckles of King Street in the City of Bridgetown Barbados.
    I even met Samantha Cummings face to face and let her know, That We are aware of what she had done. first hand information .

  48. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ David
    Do try and read what Deeds has said to me .Do you think a person with his mindset is open to receiving legal advice ? You see what i mean by the name calling ? Note his reference to ” Mr Blackman . I am curious to know when he visited him as Chief Archivist . Do you really find it credibel that a Chief Archivist would reply to a person making a search in his department in the manner reported by Deeds ? This deed person is becoming more and more unbelievable .

  49. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ Deeds
    Miss Cummings CANNOT be lawyer for NHC and the Land Registry at the same time . the NHC is a statutory institution ; the Land registry is a branch of the regular Civil Service .

  50. Legalese. Avatar
    Legalese.

    @ David
    You claim that you have been keeping this deeds person in check . How then can you allow him to make this kind of statement about Miss Cummings without verification . Or is it that you expect the lady to come on to the blog and refute the statement?

1 2 3
Newer Comments

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading