Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Hal Austin

Two recent events should have shaken Barbadian society to the root. The first was the plea by former prime minister Owen Arthur for a truce on the dangerous standoff between the two dominant political parties on what to do about our badly managed economy, and for a cross-party National Commission on the Economic Development of Barbados. He did not put it in such words, but the sentiment is the same: if this generation of political leaders is going to pass on a sustainable economy and tolerant and stable society to future generations we have to call a halt on the political tribalism led by this terrible Ineptocracy (I love the word) and put our heads together in the interest of future generations.

The development, closely linked to the first, came out of the confusing and misleading hysteria about the future of Almond Resorts, was the call by Bjorn Bjerkhamn, the wealthy Norwegian, who now brands himself a ‘Barbadian’ on the basis of over 50 years of residence and, no doubt, a local passport. Mr Bjerkhamn is one of the wealthiest of the so-called New Barbadians, people who have moved from the four corners of the world and have sought to appropriate our lovely island and call it home. Some of them have nothing but contempt for local people, although this may not apply to Mr Bjerkhamn. I think I have some form on this: I have lived in Britain for over twice as long as I have lived in Barbados. Armed with my British passport, I am still reminded almost every day that I am an immigrant and any children or grandchildren those of us who have lived in Britain since the 1960s have, are called second-generation, or third-generation immigrants. It is a burden I am prepared to carry on my shoulders, since I challenge any man or woman to be more Barbadian than I.

In fact, to be brutally honest, not a day goes by without my thinking of the Ivy, that wonderful small town just off Government Hill and Howells X Road, where I was born and where my maternal grandmother, Mama, showed me the real meaning of unconditional love – and good food. My heart belongs to the Ivy and its people, which in its small way, has produced – the author apart – some of the most brilliant people in our national history – including St Giles, the most under-rated school in the country. Those from Carrington Village may challenge this, even though the best of them went to St Giles, but they are minnows. Let no man say he is more Barbadian than I, even Mr Bjerkhamn, who on the basis of my UK experience, is simply a Nordic immigrant.

But this is the elephant in the room: foreigners buying up Barbados as if there is no tomorrow and our inept politicians and senior civil servants standing idly by and allowing this to take place. Barbadians are proud people and it hurts to see the most attractive parts of our landscape being sold to foreigners – traditional Caricom citizens excepted – just because they have fat wallets.

Can’t our politicians understand this? Don’t they have any dignity or national pride? Why should we allow some Irish-Canadian to turn Skeete’s Bay in to part of his version of Xanadu, his fantasy bit of Paradise; or some failed bathroom and kitchen maker to establish an upmarket estate on the West Coast for American hedge fund owners and semi-literate British footballers; or allow an over-ambitious local economist to use taxpayers’ money to buy a white elephant of a hotel to satisfy his own desires?

Barbados belongs to its people, and their children and their children’s children, not to politicians who can see no further than the next election, or civil servants who cannot see past their salaries and pensions. It is interesting that it has taken a foreigner, no matter how long he has lived in Barbados, to raise this important national question of nationality and ownership. That he has (or part owns) Port St Charles, St Peter’s Bay, Sapphire Beach – and the other inappropriate re-naming of traditional and provides jobs for over 3000 people is no excuse. Does that mean when the Russian oligarchs come knocking at our door with their ill-gotten gains that we will curl up and allow them to tickle our bellies? Most of Bjerkhamn’s wealth, or at least a substantial part, came from Barbadian taxpayers for work undertaken on public projects by his constructions firms.

How much new money did he arrive in Barbados with? How much did Paul Doyle bring with him? I will bet my right arm that Doyle’s bank is a local Canadian bank. Nothing wrong with that, but how many local small businesses do these Canadian banks lend to?

Our ever so clever lawyers, accountants, estate agents, politicians, planners and others daily conspire in selling our birthplace for thirty pieces of silver.

This is where Arthur’s call for a national commission comes in. Let us all who really care about the future of Barbados put our heads together in a non-party political way to rescue that poor but wonderful island Barbados from these foreign carpetbaggers.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

113 responses to “Notes From a Native Son – Are We Facing the Point of No-Return?”


  1. @Capone

    Why do we attack people for their views because they live overseas?

    Did we not ship in Paul Volcker to lecture our Captains of industry et al at the bastion of fiscal and monetary authority in Barbados?

    @Bush Tea

    Why do you bother. Why not just write, ‘let us go with the flow’ and be done?

  2. Observing (and thinking) Avatar
    Observing (and thinking)

    @Bushie
    “It is about having a true understanding of WHO WE ARE,”
    Best words I’ve heard here in a while. Once you accept that point and choose to live with and from it everything else (and to some degree everyone else’s opinion) is internally irrelevant. Peace and harmony flows.

    @Hal
    Keep writing muh brother. You doing and contributing more to national thinking than 90% of us.


  3. @David.
    Views don’t get us anywhere, actions do.

    Why do consultants constantly make money preaching the same thing every month/year, because no one ever implements what they learn.

    We have a thirst for knowledge but when it comes to action we fail.

    I am not attacking the individual as I do find his comments very interesting. My issue is, we need people like him and more back in Barbados to give us the direction and hand holding assistance we need to move forward.

    If the Bajans, that are now living Overseas don’t do it, then others will take their place and that is what is happening and I am talking about the Trinidadians.

    Paul Doyle & Bjerkham are small when compared to the collective and growing assets of Trinidadians in Barbados.


  4. @ Capone,

    Bajans living and working overseas do their part by supporting their families in Barbados thereby pumping over $100 million US a year into the economy.
    Think of it as a back up plan for difficult times.

    You invite us to come back and play our part but some of us would just be “blocking”. Barbados has high unemployment and we don’t want overseas bajans tekkin way jobs.

    Capone this is a free blog and we gine stan wey we is, write shiite and tek we licks from Bush Tea who really knows it all.


  5. @Hants

    “You invite us to come back and play our part but some of us would just be “blocking”. Barbados has high unemployment and we don’t want overseas bajans tekkin way jobs”.

    The employement we need is that in high places, with Barbadian Roots, that understand our culture and can develop the industry around it.
    How can we be vex about what is going on in Barbados when the industry that I being developed is by those that understand their culture and implement it here because they are in the high positions.

    Hence why development is taking the European & North American look.

    However, we always look for positions instead of putting things in place to create them.


  6. This may be a good time to discuss how we can reduce our dependence on tourism.

    What will we repace it with?

    I gine fishing and when I come back I will add my two cents worth.


  7. @Hants

    This is just a “juking uh” comment 🙂

    Instead of going fishing, why not come down to the market where I am now and support me by buying a fish from me. That is how I support my family and how I plan to kickstart the economy.

    Enjoy your fishing.


  8. @ Bush…over my second cup of coffee for the morning

    There is a little fella with a profile who once attended a kind of ceremony that in part concerned me. Since that time whenever I’ve seen him in the supermarket he has always said ‘hello’ without prompting from me. There’s another fella much taller who people love to talk about who has only ever shown me kindness though he has nothing to gain. I respect them for that – given that I’m no-one very much. There’s much more to it than that, of course. But maybe it also corroborates what you’re saying or better, where you’re coming from and why I don’t necessarily reject it.

    I accept the past tense of the question – ‘Had’.


  9. I find it dissapointing that Hal Austin is being subjected to personal attacks because he – a Bajan – has made observations from abroad. If his opinions are without merit they can be refuted with facts but a fall -back position of “he is abroad” is not worthy of some who should know better.

    A broad range of views is what we need to examine issues from different perspectives. Hal is more than capable of defending himself but he should know that some are reading his submissions and welcome them.

    Over the years we have had many excellent contributors to BU some because of the personal attacks decided to fade away….thinking why bother. Are we not above that viciousness or should we be satiated with platitudes and knock about banter.


  10. LOL
    There is no place like BU……

    @ David
    Leave Capone alone, he is just being honest. Of course it takes all kinds to keep our world as interesting (and effective a coldron) as it is.

    Since the financial difficulties of the Sandiford era, Bajans have been schooled to think that the very essence of success lies in foreign reserves and a reliable wage or salary.

    This philosophy was reinforced by Owen who, remember, had his own personal financial challenges before his ascent to power.
    It is therefore not difficult to understand why so many of us have come to conclude that “we need people to come to Barbados to hold our hand so that we can ‘move forward’….”
    Do you grasp the mentality….?
    We need people of means to come and take care of us.
    Why will these “people of means” want to do that…do you think?
    what will they want in return….?

    Blame Owen. Do you recall that he enacted laws to attract such persons to come here? Tax incentives, special status, exemptions…. Things that born Bajans could not dream of….

    HERE IS WHY PEOPLE LIKE HAL ARE IMPORTANT….. Not because they are Johns coming to spend a fare ( or even buy a fish….) BUT because he is causing us to review our misdirected life style. To reassess our VALUES. To study WHO we really are

    Now THAT is value.

    Bushie suggests that our TRUE values are reflected in our National Anthem and Pledge rather than in our GDP or FOREX reserves. If we actualy understood this fact, Barbados would be a dramatically different and better place and would, BECAUSE of that difference, become a genuine role model and exporter of true value.

    Our current approach is one of catching at the shadow and losing the bone……


  11. @ Bush

    You mention the perception of visitors – and yes, you are right. But you omit to say it is rooted in the smiles of Broad Street, the fake Anglo-American ‘twang’, and the ‘guvs’ of taxi drivers.

    And yes, we’re a funny mix – such dear, dear friends some and yet all of us -everywhere – harmonious with each other, all the subtleties of dark and light mish-mashed together like the ‘good Samaritan’ who beat his wife before setting out on the Jericho road and never paid the inn keeper what he owed.

    There’s one thing you can add to Caswell – loyalty. Yet this Caswell, despite all his sense of justice, was, if I remember, so dismissive of Garcia (or something we were discussing involving ‘justice’) as to cause me to flare up. He became small-minded….the mish-mash again. But yes, I would certainly have him on board too. Besides, he writes well. His humble opinion of himself – if that’s what you mean – is an endearing feature and, yes, his mind is capable clearly of looking beyond. I’m unclear about the ‘other’. I can’t buy the message – secreted in all the tosh, as it may be – because it’s premises are false. To do so would be opportunism. But in reality, I’m sure he’s a wonderful cuddly person who doesn’t beat his wife – but then maybe he won’t help on the Jericho road either.


  12. Hants 🙂
    That was an attempted low blow.
    Fortunately Bushie is a certified martial arts exponent and can easily deflect such attacks….LOL

    The fact is that Bushie DOES NOT KNOW EVERYTHING.
    There are a number of matters which remain unknown and / or unexplained to the Bushman. These however are largely matters that do not presently, nor have in the past, attracted Bushie’s interest.

    If you truly understand Bushie’s “BBE connections” you should not be surprised.

    @ RR
    Easy with the caffeine old chap. Anyway, should you not be having a good old “cuppa” instead?

    You may be right about the tense “HAD”.
    It is becoming increasingly apparent that a new national culture has taken root. thing is that we usually only realize the change when the consequential symptoms arrive in force….


  13. The bajan spirit has been dumbed down to the point of no return. just take a look at what most be bajns called as being successful bajans are quite happy receiving the crumbs off the masters table and don,t even bother about telling them that what they are receiving does not amount to a hill of beans .there are enough bajans living in the island with great ideas but one of the major drawbacks is our inabilty totrust our own.


  14. @ Yardbroom

    H Austin knows very well that some people support him. Every post I’ve read from him begins with a commendation blog. I do not know him. My attacks are not, therefore, personal. IF you are brave enough to post here, you must expect to have the ‘message’ thoroughly sorted and if that, the message and the way it is expressed, says something of the man then let the cap fit. All of us face the same scrutiny in everything we write. Indeed BU encourages it with the idea of voting. And mind – the argument is not about ‘he is abroad’. It is about what it is to be Bajan, who we really are, and the contributions, actual and prospective, of all Bajans irrespective of skin colour, ethnic origin, sex and the rest, and, indeed, of all who contribute meaningfully. That issue was raised more-or-less directly by H Austin himself – which is why Bush, I imagine, urges tolerance.


  15. @ Bush

    Don’t be silly – the ‘cuppa’ is for the afternoon – Darjeeling.


  16. @ Bush

    ‘the value of Hal’

    ‘Causing’ – exactly right. See how this post has developed. And maybe he had to utter all the tosh to make it so. At the least it added spice if not exactly ‘dildo spice’. Where is ‘One finger’ by the way?


  17. But Robert,
    You must know that the value in true communication and debate lies, not in any one contributor’s being the font of all knowledge, but in the synergetic totality of the exercise.
    This is why sometime a complete fool could well be the catalyst that leads us to an understanding of very complex matters.

    LOL … This is why David humours old onions and Bushie 🙂 (but especially old onions)


  18. @Bushie

    Surprise you summons the courage to position yourself in the same class as Old Onions Bag…lol.

    Onions can handle it though…lol!


  19. @ Bush

    You got that right. But where IS ‘one finger’? And did he give you a T shirt?


  20. Hi robert ross April 21, 2012 @11:34am

    In your address to me Yardbroom, you stated with reference to Hal Austin quote: ” I do not know him. My attacks are not, therefore personal.”

    Do forgive me if I have misread your posts but may I quote a few lines from your previous remarks, which gave reason to draw the conclusion I did.
    ———————————-
    With reference to Hal Austin quote:
    April 20, 2012 @ 7:11am
    ” I regard you as a cheap hypocrite on the basis of what you write”.

    April 20, 2012 @ 8:44pm
    “While he ponces about London and contributes nothing save confused posts on Bu riddled with hypocracy.”

    April 20, 2012 @ 8:44pm
    “Judged by all this mean spirited nonsense – what is Austin?”
    ———————————–
    I do not know Hal Austin but I found the above a little sharp, particularly the “what” in your last sentence. However, I could have made a mistake in my assessment.


  21. @ Bushman
    You are free to philosophize. I, on the other hand, will dwell in reality and the fact is that we can live and live well without one single person owning land, but the same does not hold true if we don’t have FOREX. Marx too was philosophical and he opposed the concept of land ownership.
    However, I am neither promoting the idea that FOREX is the end all and be all nor that individuals should not own land. The gist of my argument is that the idea of everyone owning land threatens our productive capacity. How many former plantation lands are now terraces, parks and heights?

    Regarding the prostitution analogy, the prostitute earns income through the use of one aspect of her asset (beauty) and in the process ignores the others she is blessed with. She could have used other facets of her asset and become for example a fashion model with “proud character of virtue, honesty and self confidence” while still earning even more than a prostitute, maintaining longstanding relations with key players yet changing clients and looks with age and circumstances to remain relevant leaving a name that is recognisable internationally for good reasons. I see a model not the prostitute and therein lies the difference.

    @ Blogger 2012
    Are the housing units being built by government caves or are they OWNED by the occupants?


  22. Does any one truly believe that if the average black bajan had accumulated as much wealth as Cow williams and others they would be treated with the same respect .for example if this article was written with the same context by an author of another race the response would be entirely different which only shows that we as a people have very little tolerance or respect or trustworthiness for one another.that is why the powers that be can so easily feed us corn beef and biscuits and we ask for more


  23. Bush Tea “The fact is that Bushie DOES NOT KNOW EVERYTHING.”

    ok Bushie. my mistake. t should have written that Bushie is a know it almost all.lol.
    …including mixed martial arts.


  24. @ Yardbroom
    Yes my blogs were harsh. And, yes, it was not wrong to assume that my remarks were ‘personal’. That was natural enough – and is why I took the trouble to respond. You will note, however, that I did not call Austin ‘fool’, ‘idiot’, ‘cretin’ or any other standard ‘expletive deleted’ you find on here. My observations were directed to what was said and the conclusions I drew from them. For me, the piece is riddled with hypocrisy – which is why I referred to “on the basis of what you write” (as in your first quote. Your reference to ‘what’ in the last quote is a reference to whether HA is a bajan…the ‘what’ was appropriate in the sense I was writing. But I can’t see what I’m now wiritng and so you will have to bear with me. Thanks for drawing my attention to my hopeless spelling.


  25. @ Yardbroom

    I can see again…I can say, having listened to Bush, that the piece has value as a catalyst. I don’t really want to make this point – but do remember I’m not the only one to take the view I have, though sure no-one has expressed it quite so strongly. If you want constructive criticism – then I think HA should have made his point without the cheap jibes he did and so without the consequential summary dismissal of those he he doesn’t consider truly Bajan. Coherence and relevance , as many have noted again and again, are not HA’s strong points judging by what he writes.


  26. @robert

    Equally you could have responded to the points you believe to be substantive.


  27. Hi robert ross
    Understood
    Yardbroom


  28. @ David

    Don’t you think I write enough? LOL My wife keeps telling me to find something better to do. But see my responses to Bush and then to you…the ‘to be ourselves’ response…that is US without all the conditioning we’ve suffered from since we were in short trousers and navy knickers. There are so many things that have spoiled us.


  29. @Enuff
    Cuh dear man, you of all people should know better than to interfere with Bushies’s analogies…
    There is absolutely no comparison between a woman who sells her body for sexual pleasure and someone who uses special skills to make clothes for sale…

    …you just wake up from a long nap…?

    The former says “look how beautiful I am, come and have your way…. That will cost you X forex. Just let me know your pleasure- special discounts for regular visitors. We have regular medical checks done for your safety.

    A Dressmaker says ” highest quality and best fit, made to your specifications… We offer prompt service with a smile.”


  30. Bush Tea did you read Lowdown in the Nationnews ?


  31. At the end of the second world war, several European states such as Austria and Switzerland, made it illegal for foreigners (i.e Germans) to own property in their countries. This was to stop outsiders from buying up chalets, ski slopes or sites of natural beauty as tourist destinations or holiday homes, to prevent foreigners screwing up the housing market and depriving locals of their patrimony. Yet these countries experienced a tourist boom when Alpine destinations became chic in the 60’s and 70’s and large sums of money were accrued by locals as a result. Later it was no longer an issue when these countries became wealthy in their own right. I do agree that what little land is left in Barbados should be left to Bajans and yes, the diaspora should be included.


  32. Hypocrisy: Wikipedia definition: The state of pretending to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that one does not actually have.

    Hypocracy: Inkwell definition: A government which won an election on the basis of promises it made but had no intention of fulfilling.

    Hypocrasy: Definition??? ….. Anyone???


  33. @ Bushie
    A dressmaker is NOT a model, the latter uses her beauty to make money just like a prostitute just not the same ‘part(s)’ of what makes her beautiful.
    I am finished!!


  34. @ Enuff
    Apologies. You did say fashion MODEL.

    BUT….
    It still is not the same thing. Indeed, a fashion model is EXACTLY the kind of model that Bushie is advocating for Barbados.

    This is the kind of model that has refined their character and physical assets by honest hard work, by good living and commitment to standards and by becoming the kind of role model that others want to emulate.

    Persons do not become models by selling their asse(t)s to to the highest bidder for sexual pleasure…..( Well they DO become models… models of ridicule.)

    What kind of ‘model’ has thousands of its citizens unemployed on the block…. (Each with an expensive education provided by the state – up to and including advanced degrees,). While semi literate foreigners who may have accumulated wealth through dubious means, are allowed to come here, buy the best land, companies and assets, and then to set OUR national agenda?

    What ‘model’ is it to have a near 100% educated population who are content to sit back and expect people from ‘over and away’ to come here and provide work ($$$$) for them?
    Is that a fashion model mentality or a whore mentality?

    There is NO VISION among our leaders. By leaders, Bushie is including, not only the obvious idiots in charge, but also those here on this blog who see themselves as leaders in thinking …. Like , YARDBROOM, INKWELL,GP,DAVID (both BU and VOB 🙂 ). BAFBFP ETC….NO VISION!!! Lots of brain. Lots of knowledge. Lots of ideas. BUT NO VISION.
    …so what kind of leaders do you expect us to have…..?
    And where there is no vision…. People get exactly what they deserve….

    The Cooperative government approach is the ULTIMATE available mechanism to facilitate;
    – enfranchisement
    – transparency and openness
    – FOI
    – accountability of leadership
    – pooling of responsibility for national progress
    – cost of governance
    – quality of governence

    Bushie has outlined the simplicity of introducing this concept IN TIME FOR NEXT ELECTION
    Bushie has Identified the MOST VITAL COMPONENT required for its success – A HONEST AND COMMITTED PROCESS MANAGER (in the form of CASWELL)

    Have we explored the idea? Criticized it? Discounted it? Improved it?
    NOOOOOO!!!

    Yet people here persist in their quest to find richer an less demanding ‘JOHNS’ to patronize our national fare…

    WE ARE ADDICTED TO PROSTITUTION.


  35. Hi Bush Tea
    You are in good form this morning, I am forward defensive bat and pad close together, bat handle angled down and watching the ball on to the bat.
    Cheers


  36. Good play Yardie, 🙂
    Bushie was trying to elicit an attacking shot… Have a man at silly midon in waiting ( can’t miss him, smells of old onions…)


  37. I formin’ the FIRST registered political party in Barbados. It will be called the United Artisan Effort and its leaders will be liable to their shirt buttons for any misdeeds while in office. Our decisions will be challengeable in court. Who wid me …? (No lawyers please, I intend to make the office of Attorney General redundant and transfer all relevant responsibilities to a Civil Servant).

    The party will implement an office of Contractor General. The candidate will be a non-Barbadian with NO previous Barbadian ties. All statutory corporations will be incorporated into central Government. All retiring high court Judges will be replaced with Non-Caribbean Commonwealth personnel.

    Engineers, natural science and arisan/production based individuals will be given an appropriate amont of management training to fill ALL senior openings ahead of economists and social science types, in the Civil Service as the positions become available.

    The Ministries of Housing and Culture will be summarily shut … so too the Productivity Council and the recently set up Community Councils.

    International travel by Public Servants including Ministers will be cut by ninety percent and of such expenditure will be tracked and publically reported on yearly. And so on.

    The Credit Unions will be allowed to set up their own banks and will be invited into the process of assisting failing companies, including hotels.

    Neil ana Massey will be forced to find ways of earning some of the foreign exchange that it is so use to spending … and so on


  38. @ Bushie
    I still don’t see it as prostitution….at least we are on the same page ref a ‘fashion model’ model for Barbados. Let the foreigners buy the west coast–it is a swamp even the Arawaks and Caribs knew that and one swell away from being washed away. Best lands?? Not!!! And again I ask, how much of the lands recently developed were new developments versus Redevelopments and how many were prevously locally owned?
    You against foreign money and BAFBFP promoting the invasion of ‘foreigners’ brains….lol.


  39. @
    “Engineers, natural science and arisan/production based individuals will be given an appropriate amont of management training to fill ALL senior openings ahead of economists and social science types, in the Civil Service as the positions become available.”

    The educational background of the prson is not what’s critical, but the ability to be able to understand the role of each sector/ministry and to develop sectoral policy that is harmonious across each sector and in sync with a national objective i.e. horizontal integration of policy.


  40. @BAFBFP
    Does not seem that your manifesto is going to be much different than what is currently on offer. And in any event we must deal with items that have larger orders of magnitude if we are to change things. Why did you not ask us help develop the manifesto. These may include a strategic default; abandoning the defense force; firing the governor general; land reform; using Bajan abroad as a military force in the fight for economic survival; right to recall any elected official; rewrite the constitution; realignment of international relations; and so on.


  41. Bottomline there must be a ‘Bajan Spring’ to provoke the lateral thinking required for a movement as suggested to take root no?


  42. Yes, and we will also have to make any one god system illegal. We can proceed now to write a new constitution on the basis that we already have the power to govern ourselves. Thus ignoring the place on Bay Street or in Parliament Buildings LOL. You are nominated as interim PM to oversee the transition. Of course you’ll have to receive the backing of the people through voting here LOL


  43. @ Pacha

    I ain’ nah dictator, even though I am not too opposed to them. Man I welcome suggestions. But I must warn of the danger to the civilian population of firing an army of trained killers LOL.

    I would also thread lightly with our relationship with Britain. I say get on the road to large scale productive export before we tackle the GG (tourism, you know how…). The other items are fine. But my special shine is for a transformation of the Senate to one that truly represents minority interests. We are all minorities in some way. So the party will change the constitution (we may have to wring arms to get the two thirds majority) to have Senate seats allocated religious groups (three), business types (four), environmentalists (one), physical demographics (one to rural one to urban), gender (three) and so on …


  44. @BAFBFP
    Your are a real Bajan. Want to play it safe viz a viz the defense force uh. These guys are generally little more than boy scouts. They have never fought any real wars anywhere and during the events in Grenada the Americans were joking about them. In any event they were nowhere near the front lines. We hear that now they have a few special operations units though. But can’t judge what that means. LOL. But cyber warfare is a new and potentially profitable ‘industry’ and we maybe able to commercialize this force and have them operating like Ze, for example. The only thing is that Barbados may be seen by some as a threat and treated accordingly. This will no doubt scare us all. No LOL. The Saudis, the Qataris and others are outsourcing a lot of this kind of ‘work’ these days – if you want Forex and have potentially dangerous men/women on your hands. LOL

    We still think that your recommendations are properly located on the periphery of the problems we face Mr Prime Minister. No amount of tinkering will fix any of this. We are especially concerned that a man of your stature would be unwilling to sever the existing relations with the Mother Country. LOL


  45. @BAFBFP
    As far as large scale production is concerned, it is not going to happen because the costs of all the inputs in Barbados are to high. Why do you think there have been few new hotels in Barbados in about 30 years. Recently, there might have been a few but that does not change the underlying industry structure. This is the real problem that companies like Almond will continue to face and have faced for 30 to 40 years. To the point where most of the hotel industry is unprofitable and there is no amount of tinkering that will fix this. Manufacturing was allways an ‘industry’ not treated with any degree of seriousness in Barbados. Things are unlikely to change anytime soon, even if industrial transformation was possible. We are guided that it is not.


  46. @Pacha

    Interesting that our last comments were posted at about the same time albeit on different blogs:

    Submitted on 2012/04/24 at 7:44 AM

    Interesting observation from Colin Jordan who is President of the Barbados Hotel Tourism Association today. He speaks to a systemic problem facing the tourism industry which sees them battling high cost and unable to refurbish plant which is a routine requirement in that kind of business. This is where we have hedged all our bets and if his observation is correct we are in for a rough ride. There is no reason why we should disbelieve him given his accounting training and intimacy with the hotel product. We need to wake up!

    Are there stats about how many hotels have closed across the region?

    http://www.nationnews.com/articles/view/hotels-sos-for-new-ideas/


  47. @BAFBFP
    Dictatorship! We were talking about a form of direct democracy were the PM Sir has no more power than any other citizen. Were the populace are the leaders and the current leaders would be the real servants of the people. Right now the PM of Barbados has more relative power than the President of the USA. This is what has to be focused on if we are to find a better way


  48. @ David
    With all due respect to you as a kind host. We have little respect for the Colin Jordans of this world. To us these are the people who sat down on their asses for all these years and presided over the monstrous malaise that we now face. We have to stop respecting people in Barbados because they have a few useless degrees and hold position of prominence. We hate to be in a position where hotel owners in Barbados or the hotel industry has to be defended by us. However, for 40 years these problem have been existing and as a country we have always had a mealy mouth approach to them. We have seen many Colin Jordans come and go but the problems continue to rise, decade after decade. But this is a deeper problem than Jordan or a bankrupt hotel owing culture. To us this represents that has implications for our survival as a people. Until we can find a way out of this failing construct the hotel industry in Barbados will experience a major collapse.


  49. @ David
    We have just had a look at the Colin Jordan piece. Thiry years ago he could have made this same comment and he would have been right. In fact ‘hoteliers’ and their managerial class have been complaining all this time but Barbados has always had no strategic response.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading